View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MINUTES OF MEETING
of the
FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
September 19-20, 1938

MINUTES OF M EETIN G OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
September 19, 1938
The third statutory meeting of the Federal Advisory Council for 1938 was convened
in the Board Room of the Federal Reserve Building, Washington, D. C., on Monday,
September 19, 1938, at 10:15 A. M ., the President, M r. Smith, in the Chair.

Present:
Mr. Thomas M . Steele
Mr. W. W. Aldrich
Mr. Howard A. Loeb
Mr. Robert M . Hanes
M r. Edward Ball
Mr. Edward E. Brown
Mr. Walter W. Smith
Mr. John Crosby
Mr. C. Q. Chandler
Mr. R. Ellison Harding
Mr. Paul S. Dick
M r. Walter Lichtenstein

District No.
District No.
District No.
District No.
District No.
District No.
District No.
District No.
District No.
District No.
District No.
Secretary

8
9
10
11
12

Absent:
M r. L. B. Williams

District No. 4

On motion, duly made and seconded, the minutes of the meeting of the Council of
May 15-17,1938, copies of which had been previously sent to the members, were approved.
The Secretary announced that M r. L. B. Williams, representative of the Fourth
District, had written expressing his regret that he would be unable to be present at this
session of the Council and that the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland had decided not
to send an alternate.
The Secretary read a letter dated August 3,1938, from Mr. Chester Morrill, Secretary
of the Board oi Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in which it was stated that the
Board of Governors desired to have an expression of the Council’s own views in respect
to the matters presented in the report dated May 17, 1938, in which were given the
results of an investigation as to “How can the Federal Reserve System increase the
value or scope of its services to member banks in practicable or desirable ways?”
It was unanimously agreed that the Secretary be asked to request Mr. Williams,
after correspondence with the three other members of his committee, namely Messrs.
Smith, Harding, and Dick, to prepare a report to be submitted to the members of the
Council prior to the November meeting in order that a final report might be submitted
to the Board of Governors at the November meeting. It was agreed that the report
should cover both matters of policy as well as technical operating problems.
The Secretary read M r. M orrill’s letter of August 30, asking the opinion of the
Council in regard to an amendment to Regulation F (Trust Powers of National Banks)
proposed by the Pennsylvania Bankers Association, Trust Company Section.




1

M r. Loeb presented a letter dated September 2, 1938, from M r. Frank J. Drinnen,
First Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, in which the proposed
amendment was discussed.
At 11:15 A. M ., D r. E. A. Goldenweiser, Director, Division of Research and Statis­
tics, appeared before the Council and discussed the general financial and business situa­
tion. Dr. Goldenweiser left at 12:15 P. M .
It was voted unanimously that the Federal Advisory Council recommend that
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System adopt, in principle, the amendment
to Regulation F formulated by the Pennsylvania Bankers Association, Trust Company
Section.
It was agreed that M r. Loeb would try to formulate a report discussing somewhat in
detail the proposed amendment and make suggestions in reference thereto.
A discussion took place regarding the proposal made to have the Government
establish credit banks chiefly for the purpose of making capital loans.
The meeting adjourned at 12:50 P. M . for lunch with Vice Chairman Ransom, at
which the discussion regarding credit banks was continued.
The meeting reconvened at 3:20 P. M .
It was voted to ask the Board to concur in having the November meeting of the
Council take place on November 28 and 29 in order to avoid conflict with the annual
convention of the American Bankers Association.
M r. Steele discussed the question of asking the Board to resume its former practice
of segregating in the figures of reporting member banks the loans made on collateral
security from those otherwise secured and unsecured. M r. Steele stated that he had
brought up the m atter at the suggestion of some banks in his district, but since then had
been furnished a report made to the Board on this matter and it had convinced him
that the value of segregating these figures was not sufficient to justify the Board in
resuming the former practice.
A discussion took place regarding the desirability of having the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, or some other im partial agency, make an investigation
into the credit needs of business throughout the country analagous to that in the Seventh
Federal Reserve D istrict made in 1934 under the direction of Messrs. Hardy and Viner.
President Sm ith appointed a committee, consisting of himself, Messrs. Brown and
Harding, to confer w ith the Secretary of the Treasury and suggest that the Treasury
undertake the investigation made under its auspices.
The Secretary of the Council arranged to have the committee confer with Secretary
Morgenthau at 11:00 A. M . on Tuesday, September 20.
The meeting adjourned at 4:00 P. M .




W A LT ER LIC H T EN ST E IN
Secretary.

2

M IN U TES OF M E E T IN G OF TH E FED ERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
September 20, 1938
At 10:10 A. M ., the Federal Advisory Council convened in the Board Room of the
Federal Reserve Building, Washington, D . C., the President, M r. Smith, in the Chair.
Present: M r. W alter W . Sm ith, President; M r. Howard A. Loeb, Vice President;
Messrs. T. M . Steele, W . W . Aldrich, R. M . Hanes, Edward Ball, E. E. Brown, John
Crosby, C. Q. Chandler, R . E. Harding, P. S. Dick, and Walter Lichtenstein, Secretary.
M r. Steele read the report explaining why the method of reporting secured and
unsecured loans had been changed. It was agreed to drop the matter.
The meeting adjourned at 10:20 A. M .




W A LT ER LIC H T EN ST E IN ,
Secretary.

3

MINUTES OF JOINT CO N FEREN CE OF TH E FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
AND TH E BO ARD OF GOVERN ORS OF TH E FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
September 20, 1938
At 10:30 A. M ., a joint conference of the Federal Advisory Council and the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System was held in the Board Room of the Federal
Reserve Building, Washington, D . C.
Present: Members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System:
Vice Chairm an Ronald Ransom; Governors Chester C. Davis, John McKee, and
M . S. Szymczak; also Messrs. Lawrence Clayton, Assistant to the Chairman of the
Board of Governors; W alter W yatt, General Counsel for the Board of Governors; Chester
Morrill, Secretary of the Board of Governors; L. P. Bethea and S. R. Carpenter, Assistant
Secretaries of the Board of Governors; Dr. E. A. Goldenweiser, Director, Division of
Research and Statistics, Board of Governors; Carl E. Parry, Chief of Division of Bank
Loans, B. M . Wingfield, Assistant General Counsel; E. L. Smead, Chief, Division of
Bank Operations; E lliott Thurston, Special Assistant to the Chairman, and C. E. Cagle,
Assistant Chief, Division of Examinations.
Present: Members of the Federal Advisory Council:
M r. W alter W . Sm ith, President; M r. Howard A. Loeb, Vice President; Messrs.
T. M . Steele, W . W . Aldrich, R. M . Hanes, Edward Ball, E. E. Brown, John Crosby,
C. Q. Chandler, R. E. Harding, P. S. Dick, and Walter Lichtenstein, Secretary.
President Sm ith informed the Board that owing to the fact that M r. L. B. Williams
had been in Europe all summer and was absent from this meeting, it had been found
impossible for the Council to subm it at this time a report giving the views of the Council
itself on “How can the Federal Reserve System increase the value or scope of its services
to member banks in practicable or desirable ways?” President Smith stated such a report
would be presented to the Board either before or at the time of the November meeting.
M r. Loeb reported regarding the suggested amendment to Regulation F, concerning
which some discussion took place.
At 10:50 A. M . the committee appointed to meet with the Secretary of the Treasury,
namely Messrs. Sm ith, Brown, and Harding, left, and M r. Loeb, the Vice President of
the Council, took the Chair.
A discussion took place regarding the desirability of establishing so-called inter­
mediary credit banks.
It was announced that there would be a joint meeting of the Council with the Board
and the Presidents of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks at 2:15 P. M .
The meeting adjourned at 11:20 A. M .




W A LT ER LIC H T E N ST E IN ,
Secretary.
4

M IN U TES OF M E E T IN G OF T H E FED ERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
September 20, 1938
At 11:30 A. M . the Federal Advisory Council reconvened in the Board Room in the
Federal Reserve Building, Washington, D. C., the President, Mr. Smith, in the Chair.
Present: Mr. Walter W. Smith, President; Mr. Howard A. Loeb, Vice President;
Messrs. T. M . Steele, W. W . Aldrich, R. M . Hanes, Edward Ball, E. E. Brown, John
Crosby, C. Q. Chandler, R. E. Harding, P. S. Dick, and Walter Lichtenstein, Secretary.
Mr. Brown reported for the committee which had conferred with the Secretary of the
Treasury that the Secretary agreed that it would be highly desirable to make an investi­
gation of the credit situation in the whole country such as had been suggested. He pointed
out, however, that in 1934 the Treasury had at its disposal some unallocated funds which
it was able to use to pay the expenses of such an investigation. He stated that Mr. Viner
was in Washington at the moment and he would consult with him and let the Federal
Advisory Council know his decision within a fewTdays.
The Secretary o f the Council read comments regarding the form of the proposed
amendment to Regulation F which had been prepared by the Federal Reserve Bank of
Philadelphia, a copy of which is attached to these minutes.
The Council concurred in the suggestions submitted by the Federal Reserve Bank of
Philadelphia but believes there should be two changes:
1. In paragraph 2, page 22, of the memorandum of the Pennsylvania Bankers
Association, Trust Company Section, the basis of admissions and withdrawals
from the fund should be left to the legislation of each particular state.
2. In paragraph 7, page 31, the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia suggested
that “ it would be well to add to the end of the indented paragraph on page 32 a
statement to the effect that if the fund remains closed for nine consecutive months
because of excessive illegal investments and/or depreciation it shall be placed in
liquidation.” The Council believes that it would be better to extend the period
mentioned from nine to twelve months.
With the exception o f the changes noted above, the Council agreed unanimously to
subscribe to the comments made by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia regarding
the proposed amendment to Regulation F.
The meeting adjourned at 12:05 P. M .




W A LTER LICHTENSTEIN,
Secretary.

5

MINUTES OF JOIN T CO N FEREN CE OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL,
THE BOARD OF G OVERN ORS OF T H E FED ERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, AND
T H E PR E SID E N TS OF TH E FED ERAL RESERVE BANKS
September 20, 1938
At 2:15 P. M . a joint conference of the Federal Advisory Council, the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Presidents of the Federal Reserve
Banks was held in the Board Room of the Federal Reserve Building, Washington, D. C.,
Vice Chairman Ransom, o f the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
presiding.
Present: Members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System:
Vice Chairman Ronald Ransom; Governors Chester C. Davis, John McKee, and
M. S. Szymczak; also Messrs. Lawrence Clayton, Assistant to the Chairman of the
Board of Governors, Walter Wyatt, General Counsel for the Board of Governors; Chester
Morrill, Secretary of the Board of Governors; L. P. Bethea and S. R. Carpenter, Assistant
Secretaries of the Board of Governors; Dr. E. A. Goldenweiser, Director, Division of
Research and Statistics; Carl E. Parry, Chief of Division of Bank Loans; E. L. Smead,
Chief, Division of Bank Operations; J. P. Dreibelbis, Assistant General Counsel, and
Elliott Thurston, Special Assistant to the Chairman.
Present: Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks:
Messrs. R. A. Young (Boston), G. L. Harrison (New York), J. S. Sinclair (Phila­
delphia), M . J. Fleming (Cleveland), Hugh Leach (Richmond), Oscar Newton (Atlanta),
G. J. Schaller (Chicago), W. M cC . Martin (St. Louis), J. N. Peyton (Minneapolis),
G. H. Hamilton (Kansas City), B. A. McKinney (Dallas), and W. A. Day (SanFrancisco);
also Dr. John H. Williams of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and H. H. Kimball,
Secretary of the Presidents’ conference.
Present: Members of the Federal Advisory Council:
Mr. Walter W. Smith, President; Mr. Howard A. Loeb, Vice President; Messrs.
T. M. Steele, W. W. Aldrich, R. M . Hanes, Edward Ball, E. E. Brown, John Crosby,
C. Q. Chandler, R. E. Harding, P. S. Dick, and Walter Lichtenstein, Secretary.
Dr. Williams gave a short account of the present business and financial situation.
Mr. W. W. Smith introduced the subject of the proposed intermediate credit banks
and a discussion followed regarding the readiness of banks to make available credit to
small businesses.
Vice Chairman Ransom discussed the desirability of possibly breaking down the
statistics, ordinarily reported, in such fashion that there would be a differentiation made
between renewal of old loans and new loans and also reports made of new lines of credit
granted by banks.
Dr. Goldenweiser pointed out that if either reporting member banks or all banks were
to report regarding the amount of new loans, renewals, reasons for turning down loans,




6

etc., it would be necessary to obtain this information for a given period of time. He made
it clear that statistics of this nature would have no meaning if the amounts were merely
given tor one single day.
Dr. Goldenweiser pointed out that there is a certain gap in the investigations that
have been made or are likely to be made on this whole question of granting of credit.
Consideration in these investigations is given to businesses which are going on and busi­
nesses which are failing possibly because they have not been able to obtain credit, but, of
course, no information is gathered regarding enterprises which are non-existent but which
would have been created if credit had been available. In other words, it is entirely conconceivable that there are individuals who have the ability and the desire to start pro­
ductive enterprises but who cannot obtain any capital with which to do so. Naturally, as
such enterprises are merely hypothetical and not actually in existence there is no infor­
mation to be obtained regarding them.
The meeting adjourned at 4:05 P. M .




W A LTER LICHTENSTEIN,
Secretary.

7

Federal Heserve Bank of Philadelphia

:vriri£ the form of the proposed amendment to Regulation F
---- 6--------------- -------------------------------------

..
p
|gS w
09

ir

(1 ).

We suggest that the last portion of this paragraph read

*

somewhat as fo llo w s :

"unless such investment is authorized

or permitted by sta tu tory provision s o f the s ta te , e t'j."
This wording i s more in harmony with that o f subsection (a)
o f th is s e c tio n .
Par. (2 ).

A question may be ra ised as to whether i t is proper that the
basis o f admissions and withdrawals from the fund be the
actual amount invested by the pa rticip a n t rather than a pro­
portion

of

the t o t a l o f the fund.

Although the la tt e r method

probably is b e tte r f o r determining the flu ctu a tin g in terests
o f p a rticip a n ts in a common tru st fund co n sistin g o f se cu ri­
t ie s , i t seems more p ra ctica b le to use the former metnod
in dealing with in te r e s ts in mortgage investment funds, the
appraised values o f which

do

not flu ctu a te to any great ex­

tent and whose values are more a matter o f judgment by a few
real esta te appraisers than a d a ily expression o f the judg­
ment o f hundreds or thousands o f actu al or p oten tia l buyers.
Par. (4 ),

v/e suggest that the last clause of the second sentence bebinning at line

9

read as follows:

"ana, if it finds that

the condition of the Common T'mst Fund is such that the funds
oi ouch trust might not lav/fully be invested in a participa­
tion therein at that time, or that such investment would be
contrary to provisions of this section, funds of such trust



-2-

shall not be so invested". We are dealing with a reflation,
as well aa a la\j, and it is conceivable that the laws o f some
states mi^ht penr.it participations which would not be in con­
formity with tho requirements ol this subsection.
n . (6)
25. Pal* v

I t might be w ell to make the fo llo w in g su bstitu tion s in the
wording o f th is paragraph Lina 1
5
8
10
13
18

-

"Reviewed" fo r "determined"
"F.eview" f o r "determine"
"Review" fo r "determ ination"
"Review" fo r "determ ination"
"Review" f o r "valu ation "
"Review" fo r "determ ination"

These changes are suggested in order to avoid the impression
that the tru st committee is required to reapp raise, at throe
months* in te r v a ls , the re a l e sta te owned and that securing the
mortgages in the fund.
It is a lso suggested that the fo llo w in g wording be added, e ith a
follow in g the f i r s t sentence on pa^e 23 or as a footn ote - " I t
is not the in ten tion o f t h is provision

to require an appraisal

o f rea l esta te owned or secu ring a mortgage more frequ ently
than once every three years as h erein a fter provided".
14th line.

We suggest after the words "Common Trust Fund" the

insertion of the words "exclusive of accrued income" in order
to distinguish between principal and income in valuing the
assets of the fund for the purposes of determining admissions
and withdrawals*
We suggest tho elimination of the comma aft or the word "situated"




in line 15 and the insertion of tho words "who shall b e ’and the
elimination of the comma after the word "directors" in line 14

T
and the insertion of the word ’
’
a n d ”.

This suggested change is

in order to remove any question as to whether the board cf di­
rectors or the appraisers shall inspect the real estate.
ent”. The committee’s comment regarding paragraph (7) seems to im.'g,
prove the te x t o f the paragraph, but we would suggest the addi­
tion o f a p ro v iso to the e f f e c t that not over 50$ o f the assets
of a tru st having a book valu e o f $2,400 or more may be in v e s t­
ed in a fund operated under s u b s e c tio n ( d ) .

Such a r e s t r ic t io n

is believed d e s ir a b le to prevent the investment o f e x cessiv e
portions o f the funds o f a t r u s t in a r e la t iv e l y n o n -liq u id
medium.
■ par. (7)*

Sixth li n e .

We su ggest the in s e r t io n o f the w ords, "e x clu s iv e

of income cash” , fo llo w in g the w ords, "Common Trust Fund".
:1, Par. (7).

In determining when the fund should be c lo s e d to adm issions or
withdrawals we su ggest th a t th e re be added to the t o t a l o f as­
sets which are not l e g a l f o r t r u s t investm ent the d e p re c ia tio n ,
i f any, on s e c u r i t i e s o r o th e r a s s e t s in the fund.

S e c u r itie s

may be held in lim it e d amounts f o r sh o rt p eriod s and i t i s pos­
sible that at the time adm issions o r withdrawals are contem­
plated the s e c u r it i e s would not be worth c o s t or book va lu e.
.

Subject to the above su g g e s t i o n the committee*s comment follow­
ing this paragraph seems w o r t h y of adoption except that we be­
lieve it would be w ell to add to the end of the indented para­
graph on page 32 a stat e m e n t to the effect that if the fond re­
mains closed for nine consecutive m o n t h s because of excessive
illegal investments and / o r depre c i a t i o n it shall be placed in
liquidation.



A

_____________

- 4 -

I a)

u

^

We suggest that

the a mo unt of income to be transferred to the

reserve be based on semi-annual gross income, .and not on the
to ta l o f p a r t ic ip a t io n s , in which event the r a tio might be "not
less than 10

%

nor more than

2 0 %

o f the gross income".

In the

event that a s iz a b le amount o f cash, s e c u r itie s y ie ld in g small
income, mortgages in d e fa u lt , or r e a l esta te should be held the
gross income o f the fund would d e c lin e con siderably and it
would not be e q u ita b le to continue to base the reserve accre­
tion s on the amount o f p a r t ic ip a t io n s as such a procedure would
penalize the l i f e tenants o f tr u s ts in favor o f the remainder­
men.
It is suggested th a t a p r o v is io n be in serted in th is paragraph
requiring th at the r e se rv e be held in cash, or invested in
United S tates Government s e c u r i t i e s .
In view o f the f a c t that during the l i f e o f such a fund as is
here contemplated th ere may be p r o f i t s on s e c u r it ie s as w ell as
on rea l e sta te and m ortgages, i t would be w e ll to sta te that
p r o fits from the s a le o f any fund a s s e ts s h a ll go in to the re­
serve.

I t i s a lrea d y provided that lo s s e s s h a ll be absorbed by

the reserv e.
fg 7c

( J).




We suggest that fo llo w in g the words "Common Trust Fund" in the
third lin e th ere be added the words "pursuant to the provision s
o f th is su b section governing w ithdraw als" or words o f sim ilar
import.

- 5 -

„+•« The p rov ision s o f S ectio n 24 o f the Federal Reserve A ct do not
n C o I ® 116

*

require p e r io d ic am ortiza tion in amounts such as are required




in sub-paragraph

2

o f paragraph ( 10) , pages 36 and 37 of the

memorandum, and f o r t h is reason i t v:ould seem preferable not
to admit to the fund mortgages which are authorized by Section
24 unless the am ortiza tion provision s conform to the applicable
requirements o f tho proposed addition to Regulation F.