View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

M IN U T E S O F M E E T IN G
of the

F E D E R A L A D V IS O R Y C O U N C IL
N o v e m b er 19, 1926

MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
November 19, 1926.
The last regular statutory meeting of 1926 of the Federal Advisory Council was
held in the Federal Reserve Board room, Treasury Building, Washington, D. C., Friday,
November 19, 1926.
The Acting President, Mr. C. A. Morss, called the meeting to order at 10 A. M.
Present:
Mr. C. A. Morss

District No.

Mr. James S. Alexander

District No.

Mr. L. L. Rue

District No.

Mr. J. F. Bruton

District No.

Mr. P. D. Houston

District No.

Mr. M. A. Traylor
(Alternate for Mr. F. O. Wetmore)

District No.

Mr. Breckinridge Jones

District No. 8

Mr. Theodore Wold

District No. 9

Mr. P. W. Goebel

District No. 10

Mr. B. L. Gill, Sr.
(Alternate for Mr. B. A. McKinney)

District No. 11

Mr. H. S. McKee

District No. 12

Mr. Walter Lichtenstein

Secretary

Absent:
Mr. G. A. Coulton

District No. 5

Mr. Morss stated that Mr. Coulton had fainted while visiting the Treasury the day
before and had fallen down a flight of stairs, seriously injuring himself. The latest reports,
however, were distinctly favorable, and it was expected that Mr. Coulton would recover
from his accident in a short time. The Council expressed its regrets that Mr. Coulton
should have met with an accident and therefore be unable to be present at this session
of the Council.
At 10:10 the Council adjourned to convene in joint session with the Federal Reserve
Board.
WALTER LICHTENSTEIN,




Secretary.

M IN U T E S OF JO IN T C O N F E R E N C E OF T H E F E D E R A L A D V IS O R Y
C O U N C IL A N D T H E F E D E R A L R E SE R V E B O A R D

November 19, 1926.
At 10:15 A. M . a joint conference of the Federal Advisory Council and the
Federal Reserve Board was held in the Federal Reserve Board room.
Present: Members of the Federal Reserve Board:
Governor D. R. Crissinger, Vice-Governor Edmund Platt, Messrs. C. S. Hamlin,
A. C. Miller, E. H. Cunningham; also Mr. Walter L. Eddy, Secretary; Mr. J. C. Noell,
Assistant Secretary, and Mr. E. A. Goldenweiser, Acting Director of the Division of
Research and Statistics.
Present: Members of the Federal Advisory Council:
Mr. C. A. Morss, Acting President; Messrs. James S. Alexander, L. L. Rue, J. F.
Bruton, P. D. Houston, M. A. Traylor, Breckinridge Jones, Theodore Wold, P. W.
Goebel, B. L. Gill, Sr., H. S. McKee, and Walter Lichtenstein, Secretary.
Mr. Goldenweiser, by means of charts, illustrated the trends of finance and business.
Discussion took place about the various topics concerning which the Council had
been requested to make recommendations. In regard to open market policies it was
stated by the Federal Reserve Board that the present investments amounted to approx­
imately $200,000,000, and that the Committee on Open Market Operations had made no
recommendation for any change, though it was understood that the Committee, if it
seemed advisable, might recommend the purchase of $100,000,000 more of securities
before January 1, and that such a request would probably be allowed by the Board.
It was stated that the Board has no power to issue a ruling in regard to non-cash
items, but that under the law this question must be left to the discretion of each Federal
Reserve bank.
Meeting adjourned at 12:20 P. M.




*

WALTER LICHTENSTEIN,
Secretary.

MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL

November 19, 1926.
At 12:25 P. M. the Federal Advisory Council reconvened to continue its discussion.
Present: Mr. C. A. Morss, Acting President; Messrs. James S. Alexander, L. L. Rue,
J. F. Bruton, P. D. Houston, M. A. Traylor, Breckinridge Jones, Theodore Wold, P. W.
Goebel, B. L. Gill, Sr., H. S. McKee, and Walter Lichtenstein, Secretary.
Mr. Walter Wyatt, General Counsel for the Board, appeared before the Council
and explained in greater detail than had been done, that under a decision of the United
States Supreme Court the Federal Reserve Board had no power to compel the Federal
Reserve banks to collect non-cash items. It was therefore decided that the topic about
non-cash items be stricken from the list and that no record be made of it.
Meeting adjourned at 1 P. M.




WALTER LICHTENSTEIN,
Secretary.

MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL

November 19, 1926.
At 2 P. M. the Federal Advisory Council reconvened.
Present: Mr. C. A. Morss, Acting President; Messrs. James S. Alexander, L. L. Rue,
J. F. Bruton, P. D. Houston, M. A. Traylor, Breckinridge Jones, Theodore Wold, P. W.
Goebel, B. L. Gill, Sr., H. S. McKee, and Walter Lichtenstein, Secretary.
The topics (Nos. 1-5 inclusive, attached hereto and made a part of these miniites)
were discussed and recommendations formulated which, on motion duly seconded, were
unanimously approved for presentation to the Federal Reserve Board.
Mr. Walter Wyatt, General Counsel for the Board, again appeared before the Council
in order to explain to the Federal Advisory Council the memorandum referred to under
topic 5.
Meeting adjourned at 3:45 P. M.




WALTER LICHTENSTEIN,
Secretary.

MINUTES OF JOINT MEETING OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY
COUNCIL AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD

November 19, 1926.
At 3:50 P. M. a joint meeting of the Federal Advisory Council and the Federal
Reserve Board was held in the Federal Reserve Board room.
Present: Members of the Federal Reserve Board:
Governor D. R. Crissinger, Vice-Governor Edmund Platt, Messrs. C. S. Hamlin,
A. C. Miller; also Mr. Walter Wyatt, General Counsel for the Board, Mr. Walter L.
Eddy, Secretary, and Mr. E. A. Goldenweiser, Acting Director of the Division of Research
and Statistics.
Present: Members of the Federal Advisory Council:
Mr. C. A. Morss, Acting President; Messrs. James S. Alexander, P. D. Houston,
M. A. Traylor, Breckinridge Jones, Theodore Wold, P. W. Goebel, B. L. Gill, Sr., H. S.
McKee, and Walter Lichtenstein, Secretary.
The Acting President of the Council presented to the Board the Recommendations
of the Council which had been prepared (Recommendations Nos. 1-5, attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes).
Mr. Alexander gave an interesting account of his recent European trip and read a
paper wrhich had been presented by him at a meeting in Rome, showing why, in his
opinion, the United States would be able to receive debt payments from her former allies
without detriment to herself.
Upon the request of the Federal Reserve Board the various members of the Federal
Advisory Council present reported about business conditions in their respective districts.
Meeting adjourned at 6 P. M.




WALTER LICHTENSTEIN,
Secretary.

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL TO THE
FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD

September 17, 1926.
TOPIC No. 1. What change, if any, should be made in regard to the present
agencies of Federal Reserve banks established in Cuba?
RECOMMENDATION: The Federal Advisory Council voted that in its opinion
there should only be one agency in Cuba, the Federal Reserve Bank which is to maintain
this agency to be selected with due regard to the operation and movement of commerce
and trade.
TOPIC No. 2. Interpretation of regulations regarding eligibility of paper presented
to Federal Reserve banks for rediscount.
RECOMMENDATION: The Federal Advisory Council understands that the in­
terpretation of the eligibility regulations for paper to be rediscounted has been referred
by the Federal Reserve Board to the Governors with a view that they may suggest
simplification of the regulations so that the paper of companies having one or more
subsidiaries may be made eligible for rediscount without at the same time making paper
of finance companies eligible for rediscount and otherwise violating the true intent and
spirit of the Federal Reserve Act.
Attention has also been called to the Federal Advisory Council that the various
Federal Reserve banks have different practices and requirements as to the form and
character of the statements to be filed by companies. The Federal Advisory Council
believes that the requirements and statements should be standardized and that com­
panies having one or more subsidiaries should be required to file with their banks of
deposit a consolidated statement and detailed statements of all their subsidiaries.
TOPIC No. 3. At present a tax of 13^ per cent is imposed upon the discount
received by any foreign corporation from American bankers acceptances.
RECOMMENDATION: The tax of 13^ per cent imposed upon the discount
received by any foreign corporation from American bankers acceptances restricts the
market for American bankers acceptances. The Federal Advisory Council requests the
Federal Reserve Board to use its good offices to have the law and/or regulations of the
present income tax law amended so that the income derived from American bankers
acceptances by foreign holders may not be subjected to an income tax.
TOPIC No. 4. Should the Federal Reserve Board continue its present policy of
reducing reserve requirements on demand deposits from 10 per cent to 7 per cent in the
case of outlying banks in large cities?
RECOMMENDATION: The Federal Advisory Council requests its members to
make a careful investigation of this subject and report at the next meeting.




X
3

R E C O M M E N D A T IO N O F T H E F E D E R A L A D V IS O R Y
C O U N C IL T O T H E F E D E R A L R E S E R V E B O A R D

November (9, 1926
T O P IC NO. I.— Rediscount and open market policies of the
Federal Reserve Board.
Recom m endation:—
The Federal Advisory Council concurs in the attitude of the
Federal Reserve Board that the present status quo of rediscount
rates be maintained, and the open market policy as explained by
the Federal Reserve Board is approved.

T O P IC NO. 2.— The McFadden bill.
Recom m endation:—
The Federal Advisory Council wishes to reiterate at this time
its recommendation of February 16, 1925 in respect to the McFadden
bill, which reads as follows:
“A t the request of the Federal Reserve Board the Executive
Committee of the Federal Advisory Council has reviewed the terms
of the M cFadden bill, H .R . 8887. While it is not practicable for the
Committee to review the more technical aspects of the bill or to give
its opinion upon the more detailed amendments of the various sec­
tions of the N ational Bank Act or other Federal statutes, neverthe­
less, as previously reported to the Federal Reserve Board, it is in
favor of its main purpose.
“ For some time it has been apparent that more liberal provision
must be made by Congress for national banking associations, because
of the fact that in certain sections of the country national banks are
considerably handicapped in competing with state institutions. This
is more particularly true now that Section 9 of the Federal Reserve
Act provides that a state institution may become a member bank
and retain its full charter and statutory rights as a state bank and
trust company and may continue to exercise all corporate powers
granted it by the state in which it was created, and shall be entitled
to all privileges of member banks.’
“ The Executive Committee of the Federal Advisory Council,
therefore, believes that so far as the McFadden bill is designed to
protect the national banking system and to safeguard Federal
Reserve membership, it is desirable legislation and should be enacted
into law.
“There is one feature of the bill, however, which the Executive
Committee of the Federal Advisory Council does not believe it should
let pass w ithout explicit comment and which in its opinion may
ultim ately work a gross hardship on some national banks and perhaps
seriously affect both state and national membership in the Federal
Reserve System. It is the so-called H ull amendment. W ithout dis­




cussing the details of those sections of the bill designed to authorize
the establishment of branch banks, the Hull amendment makes it
impossible in the future for any national bank located in a state
which does not now authorize branch banking to open branch banks
even if at a later date the state legislature should decide to permit
state institutions to do a branch bank business. Furthermore, that
amendment also provides that any state bank or trust company in
such a state which is now a member of the Federal Reserve System
must withdraw from the System if it should decide to do a branch
banking business under the terms of a subsequent state law permitting
branch banking after the enactment of the McFadden bill. In the
opinion of the Council, there is no reason in fairness or in logic for the
Federal Congress to authorize national banks to open branches in
those states which now authorize state institutions to do a branch
banking business and to deny that same right in the future to national
banks which may happen to be located in a state which now prohibits
branch banking but which may subsequently authorize it.”
The Federal Advisory Council authorizes its Executive Com­
mittee to memorialize either or both Houses of Congress to eliminate
the H u ll amendment from the McFadden bill.

T O P IC N O. 3.— Does the Federal Advisory Council recommend
that the practice of reducing reserves required from outlying banks
in central reserve and reserve cities be continued?
Recom m endation:—
The Federal Advisory Council in general does not approve of the
practice of reducing the reserves required from outlying banks in
central reserve and reserve cities. The Council, however, realizes that
exceptions have been made, and before reaching any final decision
the Council requests the Federal Reserve Board to furnish it with
such data and recommendations as may have been made as a result
of investigations of this question.

T O P IC N O . 4.— Should the Federal Reserve Board release for
publication the consolidated statement of condition of reporting
member banks in the two central reserve cities before getting out the
statement for the whole country?
Recom m endation:—
The Federal Advisory Council believes it is inadvisable to pub­
lish only a part of the statement of condition of reporting member
banks, as this may at times lead to false impressions as to the economic
and financial conditions of the country.




-X5

tl

T O P IC NO. 5.— The view of the Federal Advisory Council is
desired in respect to the suggestion made to the Federal Reserve
Board that the use of domestic bankers acceptances be broadened,
especially in two respects:
1. To permit the purchaser of goods under bankers accept­
ance credits to draw bills having a maturity consistent
w ith the usual and customary credit time that obtains in
the relative trade, instead of requiring the shipper to draw
the bill if it has a m aturity in excess of the actual transit
time of the goods; and
2. To permit the use of bankers acceptances secured by
“ independent converter’s receipts” covering readily mar­
ketable staples to finance the carrying of certain staples
during the time they are being converted into other forms
of staples through a converter independent of the drawer,
provided that the identity of the goods is not lost and the
accepting bank remains secured by the independent con­
verter’s receipt.
Recom m endation:—
The Federal Advisory Council requests the Federal Reserve
Board to supply to each member of the Council the full report of the
Committee which investigated the question submitted by the Federal
Reserve Board. The members of the Federal Advisory Council will
then be in a position to formulate some opinion at the next meeting
of the Council.




-X -

6