View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL

November 15, 1965
The fourth statutory meeting of the Federal Advisory Council for 1965 was
convened in the Board Room of The Madison, Washington, D.C. on November 15, 1965,
at 9:30 A.M.
Present:
District No. 1
District No. 2
District No. 3
District No. 4
District No. 5
District No. 6
District No. 7
District No. 8
District No. 9
District No. 10
District No. 11
District No. 12
Secretary
Assistant Secretary

Lawrence H. Martin
William H. Moore
William L. Day
L. A. Stoner
John F. Watlington, Jr.
Sam M. Fleming
Edward B. Smith
James P. Hickok
John A. Moorhead
Roger D. Knight, Jr.
James W. Aston
Ransom M. Cook
Herbert V. Prochnow
William J. Korsvik

On motion duly made and seconded, the mimeographed notes of the meeting of
the Council held on September 21-22, 1965, copies of which had been sent previously to
the members of the Council, were approved.
A complete list of the items on the Agenda and the conclusions of the Council
are to be found in the C o n f i d e n t i a l M e m o r a n d u m t o t h e B o a r d o f G o v e r n o r s f r o m t h e F e d e r a l
A d v i s o r y C o u n c i l , which follows on pages 32, 33, and 34 of these minutes.
The meeting adjourned at 12:30 P.M.




HERBERT V. PROCHNOW
Secretary
WILLIAM J. KORSVIK
Assistant Secretary

30.

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE F E D E R A L ADVISORY COUNCIL

November 15, 1965
At 2:30 P.M., the Federal Advisory C ouncil convened in the Board Room of the Fed­
eral Reserve B uilding, Washington, D.C.
Present: Mr. John A. Moorhead, President; Messrs. Lawrence H. Martin, William H.
Moore, William L . Day, L. A. Stoner, John F. Watlington, Jr., Edward B. Smith, James P.
Hickok, Roger D. Knight, Jr., Jam es W. Aston and Ransom M. Cook.
Absent: Mr. Sam M. Fleming
Members of the Board’s staff participated in an audio-visual presentation on domestic
and international business conditions.
H E R B E R T V. PROCHNOW
Secretary
W ILLIAM J. KORSVIK
A ssistant Secretary

November 15, 1965
At 8:10 P.M., the Federal Advisory C ouncil reconvened in the Board Room of The
Madison, Washington, D.C.
Present: Mr. John A. Moorhead, President; Messrs. Lawrence H. Martin, William H.
Moore, William L. Day, L. A. Stoner, John F. W atlington, Jr., Edward B. Smith, James P.
Hickok, Roger D. Knight, Jr., Jam es W. Aston, Ransom M. Cook, Herbert V. Prochnow,
Secretary, and William J. Korsvik, A ssistant Secretary.
Absent: Mr. Sam M. Fleming.
The Council reviewed its conclusions regarding the items on the Agenda and sent to
the office of the Secretary of the Board of Governors the C o n f i d e n t i a l M e m o r a n d u m which
follows on pages 32, 33 and 34, lis tin g the Agenda items with conclusions reached by the
Council. The M e m o r a n d u m was delivered to the Federal Reserve B uilding at 10:15 P.M.
on November 15, 1965.
The meeting adjourned at 9:05 P.M.




H E R B E R T V. PROCHNOW
Secretary
WILLIAM J. KORSVIK
A ssistant Secretary

31.

C O N F I D E N T I AL
MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FROM THE
FED ERA L ADVISORY COUNCIL
R ELA TIV E TO THE AGENDA FOR THE JOINT MEETING
ON NOVEMBER 16, 1965

1.

Economic conditions and prospects:
A.

How does the Council appraise prospects for the
U.S. economy during the remainder of this year
and the first part of 1966?

The Council anticipates that the U.S. economy during the remainder of this year
and the first part of 1966 w ill continue favorable. Businessmen, investors and consumers
appear to be generally optimistic. Employment, incomes, production, sales and profits are
at high levels. With the exeption of steel, plant capacity in major industries is at, or is
approaching, optimum utilization levels. There is also increasing evidence of labor
shortages, especially of skilled workers.
B.

What are the Council’s expectations with respect
to business fixed capital outlays in 1966? Is it
anticipated that over-capacity will result in any
important industries?

The members of the Council expect that business.fixed capital outlays in 1966
w ill be higher than they were this year, although the percentage increase may be less in
1966 than in 1965. The Council sees no evidence at present that capital outlays in 1966
w ill result in over-capacity in any important industries.
C.

Does the Council anticipate that price increases
will continue to be selective in character or
become more general?

The Council believes that price increases will continue to be selective in char­
acter, although such increases are likely to become more widespread and include a greater
number of products and services.
D.

How are business expectations being reflected
in inventory policies?

Despite the rather optimistic expectations that prevail in the business commu­
nity, additions to inventories do not appear excessive in relation to sales. However, the
present high inventory totals assume a continuation of current sales trends.




32.

E.

What are the prospects for business profits in
1966? If changes from this year’s experience
are foreseen, are they likely to be significant
from the standpoint of need for outside capital
and credit and from the standpoint of their effect
on the course of business investments?

The Council anticipates that the increase in business profits in 1966 will be
less than in 1965. This change, together with the decline in corporate liquidity, indicates
an increased need for outside capital and credit to finance the anticipated investment
spending. It is doubtful that the expected change in profits w ill have any marked impact
on the course of business investment.
2.

Banking developments.
A.

What does the Council anticipate as to year-end
business demands for bank credit in relation to
usual seasonal needs?

Most members of the Council expect that year-end business demands for bank
credit will be somewhat above the usual seasonal pattern.
B.

To what extent have selected increases occurred
in rates charged to various classes of business
loan customers, and have there been other sig­
nificant changes in loan terms?
How have
customers reacted to such increases; for example,
have plans to finance in the longer-term capital
markets been accelerated?

The Council believes that the increases in the interest rate on business loans
to various borrowers have been highly selective and practically negligible in their effect.
Although other changes in loan terms have not been significant, there is some limited
indication of an increased tendency to finance in the longer-term capital markets.
C.

How have recent developments affected the
ability of banks to attract funds in the CD mar­
ket or through the issuance of short-term promis­
sory notes?

As a result of recent developments, banks have been obliged to pay higher rates
and generally to shorten maturities on CDs and short-term promissory notes in an attempt
to attract the funds necessary to meet their borrowing customers’ requirements. Banks are
now finding it difficult to replace maturing CDs or to attract new funds at ceiling rates
established by Regulation Q.
D.

How does the Council evaluate the recent slow­
down in bank acquisition of m unicipals?

The demand for funds by business borrowers has been so strong that banks
have been obliged to reduce their acquisition of municipal obligations.




33.

3.

Balance of payments.
A.

How does the Council appraise the strength of
foreign demand for U.S. bank funds?

In the Council’s judgment, foreign demand for U.S. bank funds is strong and
exceeds the available supply. As the voluntary restraint program continues, the pent-up
demand probably will increase.
B.

Have the Council's views on the effectiveness
of the voluntary foreign credit restraint program
changed materially since the Council met with
the Board in September?

The Council believes that the voluntary foreign credit restraint program conti­
nues to be a helpful temporary measure and that there has been no lessening in its effec­
tiveness since the Council met with the Board in September.
C.

Are there any changes that the Council would
recommend in the details of the voluntary re­
straint program for banks in 1966?

If it becomes imperative that the voluntary restraint program for banks must be
continued in 1966, the Council would urge that the base, or the allowable percentage, or
both, be raised in the long-term interests of the economy.
4.

What are the Council’s views on monetary and credit
policy under current circumstances?

The productive resources of the nation — plant, equipment, labor force, and
capital - are approaching maximum utilization. In these circumstances, an expansion of
bank credit at the rate that has prevailed in the recent past will tend to bring about in­
creasingly upward pressure on prices without a commensurate increase in production.
The Council therefore wishes to reaffirm the following statement from its
September Memorandum:
“ The Council is concerned with the increasing evidence of the development of
inflationary pressures, the continued strong demand for bank loans with the reliance on
CDs to meet this demand, and the underlying difficulties with the balance of payments.
Consequently, we believe the Board should be prepared to move in the direction of further
restraint including a tightening of reserves and an increase in the discount rate.”




34.

MINUTES OF JOINT CONFERENCE OF THE FE D E R A L ADVISORY COUNCIL
AND THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE F E D E R A L RESERVE SYSTEM

November 16, 1965
At 10:30 A.M., a joint conference of the Federal Advisory Council and the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System was held in the Board Room of the
Federal Reserve Building, Washington, D.C.
Present: Members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System:
Chairman Wm. McC. Martin, Jr.; Vice Chairman C. Canby Balderston; Governors
George W. Mitchell, J. Dewey Daane and Sherman J. Maisel; also Mr. Merritt Sherman,
Secretary, and Mr. Kenneth A. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary, of the Board of Governors.
Present: Members of the Federal Advisory Council:
Mr. John A. Moorhead, President; Messrs. Lawrence H. Martin, William H.
Moore, William L. Day, L. A. Stoner, John F. Watlington, Jr., Sam M. Fleming, Edward B.
Smith, James P. Hickok, Roger D. Knight, Jr., James W. Aston, Ransom M. Cook, Herbert
V. Prochnow, Secretary, and William J. Korsvik, Assistant Secretary.
President Moorhead read the first item on the Agenda and the conclusions of
the Council as given in the C o n f i d e n t i a l M e m o r a n d u m t o t h e B o a r d o f G o v e r n o r s f r o m t h e
F e d e r a l A d v i s o r y C o u n c i l , as printed on pages 32, 33 and 34.
A brief Discussion
followed.
President Moorhead then read the second item of the Agenda and the Council’s
conclusions.
Governor Mitchell inquired whether there appeared to be a significant amount
of anticipatory borrowing from banks. There was no uniformity in the replies from the
members of the Council, the responses differing from district to district.
The President of the Council then read the third item and the conclusions of
the Council. There followed some discussion on the possible impact of the restraint
program on the volume of U.S. exports.
Chairman Martin reported that the Federal Reserve had been diligent in fol­
lowing up cases where it was alleged that the voluntary program may have had a detrimen­
tal effect. To date there was no evidence indicating that exports had been adversely
affected.
The fourth item and the conclusions of the Council were then read by President
Moorhead. An extended discussion followed in which there was wide participation by the
members of the Board and the Council.
The meeting adjourned at 12:25 P.M.




HERBERT V. PROCHNOW
Secretary

35.

WILLIAM J. KORSVIK
Assistant Secretary

NOTE:
T h i s t r a n s c r i p t of the S e c r e t a r y ’
s notes is not
to be r e g a r d e d as c o m p l e t e or n e c e s s a r i l y e n t i r e l y accurate^
The t r a n s c r i p t is for the sole use of the members of the
Federal Advisory Council,
The concise official minutes
for the e n t i r e y e a r are p r i n t e d and d i s t r i b u t e d later,
H„V* P .
W.J.K.
The S e c r e t a r y ' s n o t e s of the m e e t i n g of the Federal
A d v i s o r y C o u n c i l on N o v e m b e r 15, 1965, at 9:30 A«Mo
in the B o a r d R o o m of The M a d i s o n , Wash i n g t o n , D. C »
All m e m b e r s of the F e d e r a l A d v i s o r y Council wer e
present *
The C o u n c i l a p p r o v e d the S e c r e t a r y ’
s notes for the m e e t i n g of
September 21-22, 1 9 6 5 .
It w a s s u gge s t e d , however, that the printed
minutes for the y e a r i n c l u d e a n o t a t i o n that the Council met i n ­
f o r m a l l y in C h i c a g o o n O c t o b e r l\., 19 6 5 d u r i n g the ABA Convention*

The d i s c u s s i o n at t h e m e e t i n g w a s l i m i t e d to a r e v i e w of m o n e t a r y
policy d e v e l o p m e n t s .

A d i n n e r m e e t i n g at t h e W h i t e H o u s e on Oc t o b e r 5* 1965, at
which a n u m b e r of m e m b e r s of the C o u n c i l w e r e present, was reviewed*
Mr, Martin b r i e f l y o u t l i n e d the s t a t e m e n t he m a d e at the d i n n e r „
Messrs, W a t l i n g t o n , D a y a n d S t oner, w h o also w e r e present at the
dinner, c o m m e n t e d b r i e f l y .
ITEM I
ECONOMIC C O N D I T I O N S A N D P R O S P E C T S
A.

H O W D O E S T H E C O U N C I L A P P R A I S E P R O S P E C T S FOR THE U, S. ECONOMY
D U R I N G T H E R E M A I N D E R OF T H I S Y E A R A N D THE F I R S T PART OF 1966?

B.

W H A T A R E T H E C O U N C I L TS E X P E C T A T I O N S W I T H R E S P E C T TO BUSINESS
F I X E D C A P I T A L O U T L A Y S IN 1966?
IS IT A N T I C I P A T E D THAT OVE R ­
C A P A C I T Y W I L L R E S U L T IN A N Y I M P O R T A N T INDU S T R I E S ?

C.

D O E S T H E C O U N C I L A N T I C I P A T E T H A T P R I C E INCREASES W I L L CONTINUE
TO B E S E L E C T I V E IN C H A R A C T E R OR B E C O M E M O R E GENERAL?
H O W A R E B U S I N E S S E X P E C T A T I O N S B E I N G R E F L E C T E D IN I N V E N T O R Y
POLICIES?

E.

W H A T A R E T H E P R O S P E C T S F O R B U S I N E S S P R O F I T S IN 1966?
IF
C H A N G E S F R O M T H I S Y E A R 1S E X P E R I E N C E A R E FORESEEN, A R E THEY
L I K E L Y T O B E S I G N I F I C A N T F R O M T H E S T A N D P O I N T OF N E E D FOR OUT­
S I D E C A P I T A L A N D C R E D I T A N D F R O M T H E S T A N D P O I N T OF THEIR
E F F E C T ON T H E C O U R S E OF B U S I N E S S I N V E S T M E N T ? ___________________ _

P r e s i d e n t M o o r h e a d r e a d I t e m I»
An e x t e n d e d d i s c u s s i o n followed
n which all m e m b e r s of the C o u n c i l p a r t i c i p a t e d .
There was unanimous

ag**9ement t h a t the U , S . e c o n o m y d u r i n g the r e m a i n d e r of this year and


t]10 first p a r t of 1 9 6 6 w i l l c o n t i n u e f a v o r a b l y .
Businessmen, investors
and c o n s u m e r s a r e g e n e r a l l y o p t i m i s t i c , w i t h e m p l o y m e n t , incomes, p r o ­
duction, sa l e s , a n d p r o f i t s at h i g h l e v e l s v A n u m b e r of m e m b e r s c i t e d
the fact t h a t o u t p u t in m a n y i n d u s t r i e s is a p p r o a c h i n g o p t i m u m u t i l i z a ­
tion leve l s * T h e r e w e r e s e v e r a l r e f e r e n c e s to t h e i n c r e a s i n g l y t i g h t
-abor s i t u a t i o n a n d to t h e s h o r t a g e s of s k i l l e d w o r k e r s *
The m e m b e r s of t h e C o u n c i l e x p e c t th a t the f i x e d c a p i t a l o u t l a y s
in 1966 w i l l r i s e f u r t h e r , t h o u g h the i n c r e a s e m a y be less tha n this
year. T h e r e is n o e v i d e n c e at p r e s e n t t h a t c a p i t a l o u t l a y s in 1966
will r e s u l t in o v e r - c a p a c i t y in a n y i m p o r t a n t i n d u s t r y .
W h i l e the
members of t h e C o u n c i l e x p e c t p r i c e i n c r e a s e s to c o n t i n u e to be
selective in c h a r a c t e r , t h e y a n t i c i p a t e t h a t s u c h i n c r e a s e s w i l l b e ­
come mo r e w i d e s p r e a d a n d i n c l u d e a g r e a t e r n u m b e r of p r o d u c t s a n d s e r ­
vices. I n v e n t o r i e s , it w a s r e p o r t e d , do n o t a p p e a r e x c e s s i v e in r e l a ­
tion to s a l e s * S e v e r a l m e m b e r s c a u t i o n e d , h o w e v e r , that this c o u l d
change q u i c k l y if t h e r i s i n g s a l e s t r e n d s h o u l d slow*
The C o u n c i l
expects b u s i n e s s p r o f i t s in 1 9 6 6 to i n c r e a s e less t h a n in 1965This
development, t o g e t h e r w i t h the d e c l i n e in c o r p o r a t e l i q u i d i t y , i n d i ­
cates an i n c r e a s e d n e e d f o r o u t s i d e c a p i t a l a n d c r e d i t to f i n a n c e i n ­
vestment s p e n d i n g o
T h e a n t i c i p a t e d c h a n g e in p r o f i t s „ h o w e v e r , is not
likely to h a v e a m a r k e d i m p a c t on b u s i n e s s i n v e s t m e n t *
I T E M II
BANKING D E V E L O P M E N T S
A.

WHAT DOES T HE C O U N C I L A N T I C I P A T E AS TO Y E AR-END BUSINESS DEMANDS
FOR B A N K C R E D I T I N R E L A T I O N TO U S U A L S E A S O N A L NEEDS?

B.

TO W H A T E X T E N T H A V E S E L E C T E D I N C R E A S E S O C C U R R E D IN
TO V A R I O U S C L A S S E S O F B U S I N E S S L O A N C U S T O M E R S , A N D
B E E N O T H E R S I G N I F I C A N T C H A N G E S IN L O A N TER M S ?
HOW
R E A C T E D TQ._SUCH I N C R E A S E S : F O R E X A M P L E , H A V E PLANS
THE L O N G E R - T E R M C A P I T A L M A R K E T S B E E N A C C E L E R A T E D ?

C.

D.

R A TES C H A R G E D
H A V E TH E R E
H A V E CUS T O M E R S
TO F I N A N C E IN

H O W H A V E R E C E N T D E V E L O P M E N T S A F F E C T E D T H E A B I L I T Y OF BANKS TO
A T T R A C T F U N D S I N T H E C / D M A R K E T OR T H R O U G H THE I SSUANCE OF
SHORT-TERM PROMISSORY NOTES?
H O W D O E S T H E C O U N C I L E V A L U A T E T H E R E C E N T S L O W D O W N IN BANK
A C Q U I S I T I O N OF M U N I C I P A L S ? _________________________________________________

P r e s i d e n t M o o r h e a d t h e n r e a d I t e m II and i n v i t e d comments from the
^ouncil m e m b e r s .
Most m e m b e r s e x p e c t t h a t y e a r - e n d d e m a n d s for b a n k credit will be
somewhat a b o v e t h e u s u a l s e a s o n a l p a t t e r n .
T h e r e was some comment;
however, w h i c h i n d i c a t e d t h a t l o a n d e m a n d m a y not be as strong in some
districts a n d t h a t b u s i n e s s l o a n s m a y h a v e a l r e a d y re a c h e d their peak
the y e a r ,
T h e r e f o l l o w e d an e x t e n d e d d i s c u s s i o n on the recent
attempt to i n c r e a s e i n t e r e s t r a t e s on b u s i n e s s loans on a selective
iv8-2is. it w a s c o n c l u d e d th a t t h e s e w e r e p r a c t i c a l l y n e g l i g i b l e in



their effect.
O t h e r c h a n g e s in l o a n terms h a v e not b e e n significant,
although some m e m b e r s f e l t that there we r e l i m i t e d indications of an
I n c r e a s e d t e n d e n c y to f i n a n c e in the l o n g e r - t e r m capital markets,
A
discussion of the e x p e r i e n c e of b a n k s w i t h c / D !s dis c l o s e d that
higher rates h a v e b e e n o f f e r e d and m a t u r i t i e s g e n e r a l l y have b e e n
shortened.
It w a s r e p o r t e d that b anks are n o w f i n d i n g it difficult
to replace m a t u r i n g c / D Ts or to at t r a c t n e w funds at the ceiling rates
established b y R e g u l a t i o n P.
B e c a u s e of the strong demand for funds
by business b o r r o w e r s , b a n k s h a v e b e e n o b l i g e d to reduce their a c q u i s i ­
tion of m u n i c i p a l o b l i g a t i o n s .
I T E M III
BALANCE OP P A Y M E N T S
A.

H O W D O E S T H E C O U N C I L A P P R A I S E T H E S T R E N G T H OP FOREIGN DEMAND
FOR U. S. B A N K F U N D S ?

B.

H A V E T H E C O U N C I L fS V I E W S ON T H E E F F E C T I V E N E S S OP THE V O L U N T A R Y
F O R E I G N C R E D I T R E S T R A I N T P R O G R A M C H A N G E D M A T E R I A L L Y S I N C E THE
C O U N C I L M E T W I T H T H E B O A R D IN S E P T E M B E R ?

C.

A R E T H E R E A N Y C H A N G E S T H A T THE C O U N C I L W O U L D R E C O MMEND IN THE
D E T A I L S OP T H E V O L U N T A R Y R E S T R A I N T P R O G R A M FOR BANKS IN 1966?

P r e s i d e n t M o o r h e a d r e a d I t e m I I I 0 In the d i s cussion w h i c h
followed, t h e r e w a s g e n e r a l a g r e e m e n t that the foreign demand for
U. S. b a n k f u n d s is s t r o n g a n d e x c e e d s the ava i l a b l e supply.
Several
members sa i d t h e y e x p e c t e d the d e m a n d to b e c o m e more intense as the
voluntary r e s t r a i n t p r o g r a m c o n t i n u e s in force.
The members also
believe that t h e r e h a s b e e n n o l e s s e n i n g on the effectiveness of the
program in r e c e n t m o n t h s *
It w a s a g r e e d to suggest that if the p r o ­
gram m u s t be c o n t i n u e d in 1 9 66, t h a t the b a s e or the allowable p e r ­
centage be r a i s e d in the l o n g - t e r m i n t e r e s t of the economy.
I T E M IV
WHAT A R E T H E C O U N C I L ’
S V I E W S ON M O N E T A R Y A N D CREDIT POLICY UNDER
_______ _ _
CURRENT C I R C U M S T A N C E S ?
The P r e s i d e n t t h e n r e a d I t e m IV and an e x t e n d e d discussion
followed.
T h e r e w a s g e n e r a l a g r e e m e n t that the produ c t i v e resources
the n a t i o n are a p p r o a c h i n g m a x i m u m u t i l i z a t i o n .
In these circum­
stances, it see m s p r u d e n t to s l o w the ra t e of b a n k credit expansion*
Failure to do so p r o b a b l y w i l l r e s u l t in i n c r e a s e d upwa r d pressure
on prices.
The C o u n c i l a c c o r d i n g l y c o n c l u d e d that it w o u l d reaffirm
the f o l l o w i n g s t a t e m e n t w h i c h it m a d e in r esponse to a similar item
the S e p t e m b e r m e e t i n g :




uT h e C o u n c i l is c o n c e r n e d w i t h the increasing evidence
of the d e v e l o p m e n t of i n f l a t i o n a r y pressures, the continued
strong d e m a n d for b a n k loa ns w i t h the reliance on c/D*s to
meet this demand, and the u n d e r l y i n g difficulties w i t h the
b a l a n c e of p a y m e n t s .
C o n s e q uently, we b e l ieve the Board
should be p r e p a r e d to m o v e in the d i r e c t i o n of further r e ­
s t raint i n c l u d i n g a t i g h t e n i n g of r eserves and an increase
in the d i s c o u n t r a t e . "
The m e e t i n g a d j o u r n e d at 1 2 : 3 0 P.M*




T H E C O U N C I L C O N V E N E D IN THE B O A R D R O O M OP THE FEDERAL
R E S E R V E B U I L D I N G , W A S H I N G T O N , D. C Q , AT 2:30 P.M., ON
N O V E M B E R 15, 196 5 *
A LL M E M B E R S OF THE COUNCIL WERE
P R E S E N T E X C E P T MR, F L E M I N G W H O HAD TO LE A V E IN ORDER TO
A T T E N D A S P E C I A L S E A R S R O E B U C K B O A R D OF DIRECTORS M E E T ­
I N G IN A T L A N T A .
^ e m b e r s of the B o a r d 1s staff p a r t i c i p a t e d in an audio-visual
pres e n t a t i o n on d o m e s t i c a n d i n t e r n a t i o n a l busi n e s s c o n d i t i o n s „
An outline of the p r e s e n t a t i o n is b e i n g p r e p a r e d by the staff for
di s t r ibution to the m e m b e r s of the Council.

T H E C O U N C I L R E C O N V E N E D AT 8:10 P.M. ON N O V E M B E R 15, 1965,
IN T H E B O A R D R O O M OF T H E MADI S O N .
A L L MEMBERS OF THE
C O U N C I L W E R E P R E S E N T E X C E P T MR. FLEMING.
The C o u n c i l p r e p a r e d a n d a p p r o v e d the a t t a c h e d Confidential
Me m o r a n d u m to b e se n t to the B o a r d of G o v ernors relative to the
Agenda for the joint m e e t i n g of the Co u n c i l and the B oard on
November 16, 1965»
The M e m o r a n d u m was d e l i v e r e d to the Federal
Reserve B u i l d i n g at 1 0 : 1 5 P*M. on N o v e m b e r 15, 1965*
The m e e t i n g a d j o u r n e d at 9 : 0 5 P#M.




CONFIDENTIAL

MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FROM THE
FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
RELATIVE TO THE AGENDA FOR THE JOINT MEETING
ON NOVEMBER 16, 1965
1.

Economic conditions and prospects:
A.

How does the Council appraise prospects for
the U.S. economy during the remainder of
this year and the first part of 1966?

The Council anticipates that the U.S. economy during the
remainder of this year and the first part of 1966 will continue
favorable.
Businessmen, investors and consumers appear to be
generally optimistic. Employment, incomes, production, sales and
profits are at high levels. With the exception of steel, plant
capacity in most major industries is at, or is approaching, optimum
utilization levels. There is also increasing evidence of labor
shortages, especially of skilled workers.
B.

What are the Council's expectations with re­
spect to business fixed capital outlays in 1966?
Is it anticipated that over-capacity will re­
sult in any important industries?

The members of the Council expect that business fixed
capital outlays in 1966 will be higher than they were this year,
although the percentage increase may be less in 1966 than in 1965.
The Council sees no evidence at present that capital outlays in
1966 will result in over-capacity in any important industries.
C.

Does the Council anticipate that price in­
creases will continue to be selective in
character or become more general?

The Council believes that price increases will continue to
be selective in character, although such increases are likely to
become more widespread and include a greater number of products and
services.
D.

How are business expectations being reflected
in inventory policies?

Despite the rather optimistic expectations that prevail in
the business community, additions to inventories do not appear excessive
in relation to sales. However, the present high inventory totals
assume a continuation of current sales trends.




-2-

E.

What are the prospects for business profits
in 1966? If changes from thib year's exper­
ience are foreseen, are they likely to be
significant from the standpoint of need for
outside capital and credit and from the
standpoint of their effect on the course of
business investment?

The Council anticipates that the increase in business profits
in 1966 will be less than in 1965. This change, together with the
decline in corporate liquidity, indicates an increased need for outside
capital and credit to finance the anticipated investment spending. It
is doubtful that the expected change in profits will have any marked
impact on the course of business investment.
2.

Banking developments.
A.

What does the Council anticipate as to year-end
business demands for bank credit in relation to
usual seasonal needs?

Most members of the Council expect that year-end business
demands for bank credit will be somewhat above the usual seasonal
pattern.
B.

To what extent have selected increases
occurred in rates charged to various classes
of business loan customers5 and have there
been other significant changes in loan terms?
How have customers reacted to such increases;
for example, have plans to finance in the
longer-term capital markets been accelerated?

The Council believes that the increases in the interest rate
on business loans to various borrowers have been highly selective
and practically negligible in their effect. Although other changes
in loan terms have not been significant, there is some limited indica­
tion of an increased tendency to finance in the longer-term capital
markets.
C.

How have recent developments affected the
ability of banks to attract funds in the
CD market or through the issuance of short­
term promissory notes?

As a result of recent developments, banks have been obliged
to pay higher rates and generally to shorten maturities on CDs and
short-term promissory notes in an attempt to attract the funds necessary
to meet their borrowing customers' requirements. Banks are now finding
it difficult to replace maturing CDs or to attract new funds at
ceiling rates established by Regulation Q.




-3-

D.

How does the Council evaluate the recent slow­
down in bank acquisition of municipals?

The demand for funds by business borrowers has been so strong
that banks have been obliged to reduce their acquisition of municipal
obligations.
3.

Balance of payments.
A.

How does the Council appraise the strength of
foreign demand for U.S. bank funds?

In the Council's judgment, foreign demand for U.S. bank funds
is strong and exceeds the available supply,, As the voluntary restraint
program continues, the pent-up demand probably will increase.
B.

Have the Council's views on the effectiveness
of the voluntary foreign credit restraint
program changed materially since the Council
met with the Board in September?

The Council believes that the voluntary foreign credit restraint
program continues to be a helpful temporary measure and that there has
been no lessening in its effectiveness since the Council met with the
Eoard in September.
C.

Are there any changes that the Council would
recommend in the details of the voluntary
restraint program for banks in 1966?

If it becomes imperative that the voluntary restraint program
for banks banks must be continued in 1966, the Council would urge that
the base, or the allowable percentage, or both, be raised in the long­
term interests of the economy.
4.

What are the Council's views on monetary and credit
policy under current circumstances?

The productive resources of the nation--plant, equipment,
labor force, and capital--are approaching maximum utilization. In
these circumstances, an expansion of bank credit at the rate that has
prevailed in the recent past will tend to bring about increasingly
upward pressure on prices without a commensurate increase in production.
The Council therefore wishes to reaffirm the following
statement from its September Memorandum:




-4-

"The Council is concerned with the increasing evidence
of the development of inflationary pressures, the continued
strong demand for bank loans with the reliance on C.D.'s to
meet this demand, and the underlying difficulties with the
balance of payments. Consequently, we believe the Board
should be prepared to move in the direction of further
restraint including a tightening of reserves and an increase
in the discount rate."




60

ON N O V E M B E R 16, 1965, AT 1 0:30 A . M o , THE F E D E R A L A D V I S O R Y
C O U N C I L H E L D A JOI N T M E E T I N G W I T H T H E BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF T H E F E D E R A L R E S E R V E S Y S T E M IN T H E F E D E R A L RESERVE
B U I L D I N G , W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. A L L M E M B E R S OF T H E COUNCIL
WERE PRESENT.
T H E F O L L O W I N G M E M B E R S OF THE B O A R D OF G O V ERNORS W E R E
PRE S E N T :
C H A I R M A N M A R T I N , V I C E C H A I R M A N BALDERSTON,
G O V E R N O R S M I T C H E L L , D A A N E A N D MAISEL.
M R ? SHERMAN,
S E C R E T A R Y , A N D MR„ K E N Y O N , A S S I S T A N T SECRETARY, OF THE
B O A R D OF G O V E R N O R S A L S O W E R E P R E S E N T ?
The m i n u t e s of the joint m e e t i n g are b e i n g p r e p a r e d in the
office of the S e c r e t a r y of the B o a r d of Governors of the Federal
Reserve S y s t e m ,
T h e i r c o n t e n t w i l l be c o m p a r e d w i t h the notes of
the S e c r e t a r y of the C o u n c i l *
A s s u m i n g they are in substantial
agreement, t h e y w i l l be r e p r o d u c e d and d i s t r i b u t e d to the members
of the C o u n c i l ,
The m e e t i n g a d j o u r n e d at 1 2 : 2 5 P VM*

The n e x t m e e t i n g of the C o u n c i l w i l l be h e l d February II4.-I5 * 1966.
It also w a s a g r e e d t h a t the f o l l o w i n g m e e t i n g wil l be held on
June 20-21, 1 9 6 6 ,