View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MINUTES OF MEETINGS
of the

FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL

1966

February 14-15, 1966
June 20-21, 1966
September 19-20, 1966
November 14-15, 1966

BY-LAWS OF THE FED ERA L ADVISORY COUNCIL

ARTICLE I. OFFICERS
The Officers of this Council shall be a President, Vice President, three Directors, and a
Secretary, all of whom, except the Secretary, shall also serve as the Executive Committee.
ARTICLE II. PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT
The duties of the President shall be such as usually pertain to the office; in his absence the
Vice President shall serve.
ARTICLE III. SECRETARY
The Secretary shall be a salaried officer of the Council and his duties and compensation shall
be fixed by the Executive Committee.
ARTICLE IV. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The Executive Committee, as indicated in Article I of the by-laws, shall consist of the
President, Vice President, and the three Directors.
ARTICLE V.

DUTIES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

It shall be the duty of the Executive Committee to keep in close touch with the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System and with its regulations and promulgations, and to
communicate the same to the members of the Council, and to suggest to the Council, from time to
time, special matters for consideration.
The Executive Committee shall have the power to fix the time and place of holding its regular
and special meetings and methods of giving notice thereof.
The Executive Committee shall have full power, as officers of the Council, to act for the
Council between meetings of the Council.
Minutes of all meetings of the Executive Committee shall be kept and such minutes or digest
thereof shall be immediately forwarded to each member of the Council.
A majority of the Executive Committee shall constitute a quorum, and action of the Committee
shall be by majority of those present at any meeting.
ARTICLE VI.

MEETINGS

Regular meetings of the Federal Advisory Council shall be held in the City of Washington on
the third Tuesday of the months of February, May, September, and November of each year, unless
otherwise directed by the Executive Committee.
A preliminary meeting of the Federal Advisory Council shall be called by the Secretary in
accordance with instructions to be given by the President of the Council.
Special meetings may be called at any time and place by the President or the Executive
Committee, and shall be called by the President upon written request of any three members of the
Council.
ARTICLE VII.

ALTERNATES

In the absence of the regular representative of any Federal Reserve District, the Board of
Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of that District may appoint an alternate. The alternate so
appointed shall have the right to be present at all the meetings of the Council for which he has been
appointed. He shall have the right to take part in all discussions of the Council but shall not be
entitled to vote.
ARTICLE VIII.

AMENDMENTS

These by-laws may be changed or amended at any regular or special meeting by a vote of a
majority of the members of the Federal Advisory Council.

February 14, 1966



1.

OFFICERS AND MEMBERS OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
For the Year 1966

OFFICERS:

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:

President, John A. Moorhead
Vice President, Ransom M. Cook
Director, William L. Day
Director, John F. Watlington, Jr.
Director, Sam M. Fleming
Secretary, Herbert V. Prochnow
Assistant Secretary, William J. Korsvik

John A.
Ransom
William
John F.

Moorhead
M. Cook
L. Day
Watlington, Jr.

Sam M. Fleming

MEMBERS:
John Simmen

District No.
District No.

William H. Moore
William L. Day
L. A. Stoner
John F. Watlington, Jr.
Sam M. Fleming
Henry T. Bodman

District No.

2
3

District No.

4

District No.

5
6
7

District No.
District
District
District
District

No.
No. 8
No. 9
No. 10
District No. 11
District No. 12

A. M. Brinkley, Jr.
John A. Moorhead
Roger D. Knight, Jr.
Robert H. Stewart, III
Ransom M. Cook




1

2.

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY
OF THE
FE D ER A L ADVISORY COUNCIL
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1965

S a la rie s ................................... $ 5,000.00

Balance on hand —
December 31, 1964........... $ 8,028.51

Printing & Stationery..............
Assessments —
12 Federal Reserve
Banks...............................

Balance on hand —
December 31, 1965 ...........

5,400.00
$13,428.51

418.57

8,009.94
$13,428.51

Chicago, Illinois
February 1, 1966

To the Federal Advisory Council:
I have audited the books, vouchers, and accounts of the Secretary o f the Federal
Advisory Council for the year ended December 31, 1965, and certify that the above state­
ment agrees therewith.




Respectfully,

Donald O. Noren, Assistant Auditor
The First National Bank of Chicago

3.

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL

February 14, 1%6

The first and organizational meeting of the Federal Advisory Council for the year
1966 was convened in the Board Room of The Madison, Washington, D.C., on February
14, 1966, at 9:30 A.M.
Present:
John Simmen
William H. Moore
Howard C. Petersen, Alternate
L. A. Stoner
John F. Watlington, Jr.
Sam M. Fleming
Henry T. Bodman
A. M. Brinkley, Jr.
John A. Moorhead
Roger D. Knight, Jr.
Robert H. Stewart, III
Ransom M. Cook
Herbert V. Prochnow
William J. Korsvik

District No. 1
District No. 2
District No. 3
District No. 4
District No. 5
District No. 6
District No. 7
District No. 8
District No. 9
District No. 10
District No. 11
District No. 12
Secretary
Assistant Secretary

Absent:
William L. Day

District No. 3

Mr. John A. Moorhead was elected Chairman p r o t e m and Mr. Herbert V. Prochnow was
elected Secretary pro t e m .
The Secretary pro tem stated that communications had been received from the twelve
Federal Reserve banks, certifying to the election of their respective representatives on
the Council for the year 1966.
The following officers were nominated and unanimously elected:
John A. Moorhead, President
Ransom M. Cook, Vice President
William L. Day, Director
John F. Watlington, Jr., Director
Sam M. Fleming, Director
Herbert V. Prochnow, Secretary
William J. Korsvik, Assistant Secretary
On motion, duly made and seconded, the Council approved the by-laws, copies of
which are a part of these minuts.




4.

The Secretary presented his financial report for the year 1965, which has been
audited by Mr. Donald 0. Noren, Assistant Auditor of The First National Bank of
Chicago. The report was approved and ordered placed on file. A copy of the report is
attached and made a part of these minutes.
On motion, duly made and seconded, the printed minutes for the meetings of the
Council held on February 15-16, 1965, May 17-18, 1965, September 20-21, 1965, October
4, 1965, November 15-16, 1965, and the mimeographed notes of the meeting held November
15-16, 1965, copies of which had been sent previously to the members of the Council,
were approved.
On motion, duly made and seconded, a resolution was adopted authorizing the Secre­
tary to ask each Federal Reserve bank to contribute $450.00 toward the secretarial and
incidental expenses of the Federal Advisory Council for the year 1966 and to draw upon
them for that purpose.
A complete lis t of the items on the Agenda for the meeting and the conclusions of the
Council are to be found in the C o n f i d e n t i a l M e m o r a n d u m t o t h e B o a r d o f G o v e r n o r s f r o m
t h e F e d e r a l A d v i s o r y C o u n c i l , which follows on pages 7, 8, and 9.
The meeting adjourned at 12:50 P.M.




HERBERT V. PROCHNOW
Secretary
WILLIAM J. KORSVIK
Assistant Secretary

5.

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE FED ERA L ADVISORY COUNCIL

February 14, 1966

At 2:30 P.M., the Federal Advisory Council convened in the Board Room of the
Federal Reserve Building, Washington, D.C.
Present: Mr. John A. Moorhead, President; Messrs. John Simmen, William H. Moore,
Howard C. Petersen, Alternate for Mr. William L. Day; Messrs. L. A. Stoner, John F. Wat­
lington, Jr., Sam M. Fleming, Henry T. Bodman, A. M. Brinkley, Jr., Roger D. Knight, Jr.,
Robert H. Stewart, III, and Ransom M. Cook.
Absent: Mr. William L. Day.
Members of the Board’s staff, including Albert R. Koch, Deputy Director, Division of
Research and Statistics, and A. B. Hersey, Advisor, Division of International Finance,
gave an audio-visual presentation on domestic and international economic developments.

HERBERT V. PROCHNOW
Secretary
WILLIAM J. KORSVIK
Assistant Secretary

February 14, 1966
At 5:30 p.m., the Federal Advisory Council reconvened in the Board Room of The
Madison, Washington, D. C.
Present: Mr. John A. Moorhead, President; Messrs. John Simmen, William H. Moore,
Howard C. Petersen, Alternate for Mr. William L. Day; Messrs. L. A. Stoner, John F. Wat­
lington, Jr., Sam M. Fleming, Henry T. Bodman, A. M. Brinkley, Jr., Roger D. Knight, Jr.,
Robert H. Stewart, III, Ransom M. Cook, Herbert V. Prochnow, Secretary, and William J.
Korsvik, Assistant Secretary.
Absent: Mr. William L. Day.
The Council reviewed its conclusions regarding the items on the Agenda and sent to
the office of the Secretary of the Board of Governors the C o n f i d e n t i a l M e m o r a n d u m which
follows on pages 7, 8, and 9 listin g the Agenda items and the conclusions reached by
the Council. The M e m o r a n d u m was delivered to the Federal Reserve Building at 10:25
P. M. on February 14, 1966.
The meeting adjourned at 6:50 P. M.




H ERBERT V. PROCHNOW
Secretary
WILLIAM J . KORSVIK
Assistant Secretary

6.

CONFIDENTIAL
MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FROM THE
FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
RELATIVE TO THE AGENDA FOR THE JOINT MEETING
ON FEBRUARY 15, 1966
1.

Economic conditions and prospects.
A.

How does the Council appraise prospects for ec­
onomic activity and for industrial prices during
the first half of 1966?

The Council anticipates a further rise in the level of economic activity during
the first half of 1966. This w ill reflect 1) a larger volume of consumer spending as
incomes continue upward; 2) an expansion in capital investment as businessmen strive to
accommodate growing demands; 3) an increase in outlays by State and local governments;
and 4) a growth in expenditures by the Federal Government for domestic programs and for
military needs in Southeast Asia. As these aggregate demands are likely to tax the pro­
ductive resources of the U.S. economy, upward pressures on industrial prices seem certain
to intensify.
B.

Have Council members observed any significant
changes in business plans for additions to cap­
acity or to inventories in response to the gener­
ally more buoyant expectations now prevalent?

Though it is difficult accurately to appraise and quantify the change in bus­
iness plans, the members of the Council believe that businessmen generally are attempt­
ing to enlarge and modernize capacity as rapidly as possible. In general, inventories
appear to be reasonably well balanced. However, because of rising order backlogs and
lengthening delivery schedules, businessmen may seek to build inventories more aggres­
sively.
2.

Banking developments.
A.

What does the Council anticipate as to near-term
business demands for bank credit in relation to
usual seasonal needs? Is it anticipated that an
unusually large proportion of these demands will
be in the form of term loans?

The Council anticipates strong near-term business demands for bank credit in
excess of the usual seasonal needs. These demands are expected to cover all types of
business borrowings including term loans. There is some evidence that the tightness of
credit in the major money centers is tending to shift loans to banks in other areas.




7.

B.

How much tightening of bank lending policies
has taken place since last fall? To what extent
has such tightening extended to reductions in
amounts of loans granted or to actual turndowns
or deferrals of loan applications?

Most members of the Council report a moderate tightening of bank lending pol­
icies since last fall. The continued growth of bank reserves tended to lessen the pres­
sure to restrain bank credit expansion. By and large, the tightening of credit is occurring
on a selective basis and some loans are being turned down.
C.

How have recent developments affected the a b il­
ity and willingness of banks to attract funds in
the CD market?

Recent developments have caused banks in the major money centers to be even
more aggressive in seeking funds in the CD market. This competition for funds has forced
rates higher in the last sixty days. Despite the level of rates, the total outstanding has
grown only moderately. Moreover, as many suppliers of these funds anticipate a further
rise in interest rates, they presently are reluctant to place them in CDs with long maturi­
ties.
D.

Do members of the Council have any comments
regarding the proposed amendments to Regula­
tions D and Q announced by the Board on Jan­
uary 20, 1966, that would in effect define “ de­
posits” for the purpose of those regulations as
including promissory notes and certain other
forms of indebtedness of member banks?

The Council appreciates the problems which are involved in the issuance of
promissory notes especially of very short maturity. The many aspects of this matter pre­
clude adequate discussion within the limitations of this memorandum. Members of the
Council may express their views orally or communicate in writing with the Board.
3.

Balance of payments.
A.

How does the Council appraise the strength of
foreign demand for U. S. bank funds?

The Council believes there is evidence of increasing strength of foreign de­
mand for U. S. bank funds. This demand is likely to grow stronger the longer the volun­
tary foreign credit restraint program continues in force.




B.

Have the C ouncil’ s views on the effectiveness of
the voluntary foreign credit restraint program
changed materially since the Council met with
the Board in November?

In the C ouncil’ s judgment, the effectiveness of the voluntary foreign credit
restraint program has not changed materially since the Council met with the Board in Nov­
ember. However, the program is effective only as a temporary measure and not a solu­
tion to the basic problem.
4.

What are the C ouncil’ s views on monetary and
credit policy under current circumstances?

In the las t ninety days, the resources of the nation have neared maximum
utilization. Despite continuing additions to plant capacity, output is pressing on capacity
in many important industries, and there are increasing reports of tight labor situations,
particularly of skilled workers. These developments reflect also the nation’s growing
involvement in Southeast Asia.
As a consequence, aggregate demands are taxing the
nation’s productive capabilities with accelarating inflationary pressures. Unless there is
a w illingness to risk a serious inflation, or the imposition of controls, aggregate demands
must be moderated. To accomplish this objective and thus lessen the threat to price sta­
bility, the Council believes that monetary policy must be employed. To be specific, the
availability of reserves should be gradually reduced to more modest proportions through
open market operations. In all likelihood it may also be necessary to increase the dis­
count rate again.
The Council recognizes that monetary policy alone may not be adequate to
meet present economic pressures. F is c a l policy involving a reduction in governmental
expenditures is required, and an eventual increase in tax rates may also be necessary.




9.

MINUTES OF JOINT CONFERENCE OF THE FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
AND THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

February 15, 1966
At 10:30 A.M., a joint conference of the Federal Advisory Council and the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System was held in the Board Room of the Federal
Reserve Building, Washington, D.C.
Present: Members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System:
Chairman Wm. McC Martin, Jr.; Vice Chairman C. Canby Balderston; Governors J. L.
Robertson, Chas. N. Shepardson, George W. Mitchell, J. Dewey Daane and Sherman J.
Maisel; also Mr. Merritt Sherman, Secretary, and Mr. Kenneth A. Kenyon, Assistant Secre­
tary, of the Board of Governors.
Present: Members of the Federal Advisory Council:
Mr. John A. Moorhead, President; Messrs. John Simmen, William H. Moore, Howard C.
Petersen, Alternate for Mr. William L. Day; Messrs. L. A. Stoner, John F. Watlington, Jr.,
Sam M. Fleming, Henry T. Bodman, A. M. Brinkley, Jr., Roger D. Knight, Jr., Robert H.
Stewart, III, Ransom M. Cook, Herbert V. Prochnow, Secretary, and William J. Korsvik,
Assistant Secretary.
Absent:

Mr. William L. Day.

President Moorhead read the first item on the Agenda and the conclusions of the
Council as expressed in the C o n f i d e n t i a l M e m o r a n d u m t o t h e B o a r d o f G o v e r n o r s f r o m t h e
F e d e r a l A d v i s o r y C o u n c i l , as printed on pages 7, 8, and 9 of these minutes.
In the brief discussion which followed, several members of the Council emphasized
the possibility of further price rises during the year and that this could generate pressure
for the accumulation of larger inventories.
The President then read the second item and the conclusions of the Council. An
extended discussion followed in which the members of the Council described developments
in their particular districts.
Chairman Martin said he understood that some corporate borrowers were seeking term
money from commercial banks rather than entering the capital market. Several members of
the Council said they thought there was some term borrowing as a hedge against the pos­
sibility of higher interest rates and a rationing of credit. Chairman Martin reported that
some observers have suggested that it would be wise for the banking agencies to issue
a statement in an effort to slow the rapid expansion of bank loans. He added that it had
always been the Board’s position that bank supervision should not be used as a substitute
for monetary policy. He added, however, that the question had arisen whether there might
not be some purpose in a general statement calling for prudence and selectivity in making
loans.




10.

President Moorhead read the third item and the conclusions of the Council. In the
brief discussion which followed, hope was expressed that the increasing restrictiveness
of monetary policy to deal with the domestic situation could have some considerable effect
on the balance of payments by inducing a substantial influx of foreign capital.
The President then read the fourth item on the Agenda and the Council’s conclusions.
A long discussion followed which included comment on the possible use of guidelines in
an effort to curb loan expansion.
Governor Maisel observed that various types of loans, ordinarily considered useful,
such as those to build inventories, were ‘not necessarily useful at the moment. During
the discussion mention was made of the possible use of the selective control of consumer
credit. The members of the Council indicated they would not favor such action at this time.
At the conclusion of the discussion of the fourth item on the Agenda, Governor
Robertson inquired about the absorption of exchange charges and asked for the Council’s
reaction to the possibility of altering the Board’s position so that the absorption of ex­
change charges would no longer be regarded as a payment of interest on demand deposits.
Several members of the Council strongly stated that they were unalterably opposed
to such a change.
The meeting adjourned at 12:15 P.M.




HERBERT V. PROCHNOW
Secretary
WILLIAM J. KORSVIK
Assistant Secretary

11.

NOTE:
T h i s t r a n s c r i p t of t h e S e c r e t a r y Ts n o t e s is n o t to
b e r e g a r d e d as c o m p l e t e or n e c e s s a r i l y e n t i r e l y a c c u r a t e .
T h e t r a n s c r i p t is f o r the s o l e u s e of t h e m e m b e r s of the
Federal Advisory Council.
The concise o f f i c i a l m i nutes
for the e n t i r e y e a r are p r i n t e d a n d d i s t r i b u t e d later.
H.V.P.
W.J.K.
The S e c r e t a r y ’
s n o t e s of t h e m e e t i n g of the F e d e r a l A d v i s o r y
C o u n c i l on F e b r u a r y ll;, 1 9 6 6 , at 9 : 3 0 A . M . in the B o a r d R o o m
of T h e M a d i s o n , W a s h i n g t o n , D.C,
A l l m e m b e r s of t h e F e d e r a l
A d v i s o r y C o u n c i l w e r e p r e s e n t e x c e p t Mr. W i l l i a m L. Day.
Mr. H o w a r d C. P e t e r s e n , P r e s i d e n t , F i d e l i t y - P h i l a d e l p h i a
T r u s t C o m p a n y , P h i l a d e l p h i a , P e n n s y l v a n i a , a t t e n d e d as an
A l t e r n a t e f o r M r . Day .
T h e S e c r e t a r y p r o v i d e d e a c h m e m b e r w i t h a l i s t of a l l t h e m e m b e r s
of the C o u n c i l f o r t h e y e a r 1 9 6 6 , o f f i c i a l l y e l e c t e d in a c c o r d a n c e w i t h
communications r e c e i v e d f r o m the F e d e r a l R e s e r v e banks.
M r . J o h n A.. M o o r h e a d w a s e l e c t e d C h a i r m a n p r o t e m a n d Mr. H e r b e r t V.
Prochnow was e l e c t e d S e c r e t a r y pro t e m .
T he f o l l o w i n g o f f i c e r s w e r e n o m i n a t e d a n d u n a n i m o u s l y e l e c t e d :
J o h n A. M o o r h e a d , P r e s i d e n t
R a n s o m M. C o o k , V i c e P r e s i d e n t
W i l l i a m L. D a y , D i r e c t o r
J o h n F. W a t l i n g t o n , Jr., D i r e c t o r
S.am M. F l e m i n g , D i r e c t o r
H e r b e r t V. P r o c h n o w , S e c r e t a r y
W i l l i a m J. K o r s v i k , A s s i s t a n t S e c r e t a r y
On m o t i o n d u l y m a d e a n d s e c o n d e d , the s a l a r y of the S e c r e t a r y w a s
fixed at $ 5 > 0 0 0 a n n u a l l y , a n d t h a t of t h e A s s i s t a n t S e c r e t a r y at $ 3 * 0 0 0
annually.
The S e c r e t a r y p r e s e n t e d t h e f i n a n c i a l r e p o r t f o r the y e a r 1965?
which h a d b e e n a u d i t e d b y Mr. D o n 0. N o r e n , A s s i s t a n t A u d i t o r of The
7irst N a t i o n a l B a n k o f C h i c a g o .
The r e p o r t w a s a p p r o v e d and p l a c e d on
file.
It w i l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e f o r m a l p r i n t e d m i n u t e s .
A m o t i o n w a s a d o p t e d a u t h o r i z i n g the S e c r e t a r y to d r a w d r a f t s for
$1 >000 u p o n e a c h F e d e r a l R e s e r v e b a n k f o r t h e s e c r e t a r i a l a n d i n c i d e n t a l
expenses of t h e F e d e r a l A d v i s o r y C o u n c i l f o r the y e a r 1 966.
The b y - l a w s w e r e a p p r o v e d .
The C o u n c i l a p p r o v e d the S e c r e tary's
notes f or t h e m e e t i n g of N o v e m b e r 15>-l6, 1 9 6 5 .
The p r i n t e d m i n u t e s f o r
all of the 1 9 6 5 m e e t i n g s of the C o u n c i l , c o p i e s of w h i c h h a d b e e n s e n t
Previously to t h e m e m b e r s , a l s o w e r e a p p r o v e d .




ITEM I
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND PROSPECTS.
A.

H O W D O E S THE. C O U N C I L A P P R A I S E P R O S P E C T S F O R E C O N O M I C A C T I V I T Y
A N D F O R INDUSTRIAL.. P R I C E S D U R I N G T H E F I R S T H A L F OF 1 9 6 6 ?

B.

H A V E C O U N C I L M E M B E R S O B S E R V E D A N Y S I G N I F I C A N T C H A N G E S IN
B U S I N E S S P L A N S F O R A D D I T I O N S T O C A P A C I T Y OR TO I N V E N T O R I E S
IN R E S P O N S E T.O T H E .G E N E R A L L Y M O R E B U O Y A N T E X P E C T A T I O N S N O W
PREVALENT?

P r e s i d e n t M o o r h e a d r e a d I t e m I A a n d B a n d i n v i t e d the m e m b e r s of
the C o u n c i l to r e p o r t o n e c o n o m i c c o n d i t i o n s a n d p r o s p e c t s in t h e i r
districts.
An e x t e n d e d d i s c u s s i o n f o l l o w e d w h i c h d i s c l o s e d wide agreement
that the l e v e l of e c o n o m i c a c t i v i t y w o u l d r i s e f u r t h e r d u r i n g the f i r s t
half of 1 9 6 6 ,
This w i l l reflect
1) a l a r g e r v o l u m e of c o n s u m e r s p e n d ­
ing as i n c o m e s c o n t i n u e u p w a r d ; 2) a n e x p a n s i o n i n c a p i t a l i n v e s t m e n t
as b u s i n e s s m e n s t r i v e to a c c o m m o d a t e g r o w i n g d e m a n d s ; 3) an i n c r e a s e in
outlays b y s t a t e a n d l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t s ; a n d 1|_) a g r o w t h In e x p e n d i t u r e s
by the f e d e r a l g o v e r n m e n t f o r d o m e s t i c p r o g r a m s a n d f o r m i l i t a r y n e e d s
in S o u t h e a s t A s i a .
As a r e s u l t of t h e s e d e v e l o p m e n t s , the m e m b e r s of
the C o u n c i l a n t i c i p a t e t h a t a g g r e g a t e d e m a n d s w i l l t a x the p r o d u c t i v e
resources of t h e e c o n o m y a n d t h a t u p w a r d p r e s s u r e s on i n d u s t r i a l p r i c e s
will i n t e n s i f y .
A l t h o u g h t h e m e m b e r s of t h e C o u n c i l h a d l i t t l e s p e c i f i c d o c u m e n t a ­
tion of c h a n g e s i n b u s i n e s s p l a n s , t h e y a r e u n d e r t h e i m p r e s s i o n that
b u s i n e s s m e n a r e a t t e m p t i n g to e n l a r g e and m o d e r n i z e c a p a c i t y as r a p i d l y
as p o s s i b l e *
M o r e o v e r , It is b e l i e v e d t h a t i n v e n t o r i e s are r e a s o n a b l y
well b a l a n c e d .
H o w e v e r , b e c a u s e of r i s i n g o r d e r b a c k l o g s a n d l e n g t h e n ­
ing d e l i v e r y s c h e d u l e s , b u s i n e s s m e n m a y s e e k to b u i l d i n v e n t o r i e s m o r e
aggressively.
I T E M II A
BANKING D E V E L O P M E N T S .
A.

W H A T D O E S T H E C O U N C I L A N T I C I P A T E AS
DEMANDS FOR B A N K CREDIT IN RELATION
IS IT A N T I C I P A T E D T H A T A N U N U S U A L L Y
D E M A N D S W I L L B E I N T H E F O R M OF T E R M

TO N E A R - T E R M BU SIN ESS
T0_ U S U A L S E A S O N A L N E E D S ?
L A R G E P R O P O R T I O N OF T H E S E
LOANS?

P r e s i d e n t M o o r h e a d t h e n r e a d I t e m II A.
The d i s c u s s i o n w h i c h f o l l o w e d i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e m e m b e r s a n t i c i ­
pate s t r o n g n e a r - t e r m b u s i n e s s d e m a n d s f o r b a n k c r e d i t w h i c h w i l l exthe u s u a l s e a s o n a l n e e d s .
T h e s e d e m a n d s are e x p e c t e d to c o v e r all
of b u s i n e s s b o r r o w i n g s i n c l u d i n g t e r m l o a n s .
The d i s c u s s i o n also
;^sclosed t h a t t h e t i g h t n e s s of c r e d i t in the m a j o r m o n e y centers is te n d lri? to s h i f t l o a n d e m a n d t o b a n k s i n o t h e r a r e a s .




3.
I T E M II B
B.

H O W M U C H T I G H T E N I N G OP B A N K L E N D I N G P O L I C I E S H A S T A K E N P L A C E
SINCE LAST PALL?
TO W H A T EXTENT HAS SUCH TIGHTENING EXTENDED
T O R E D U C T I O N S I N A M O U N T S OP L O A N S GRANTED. OR T O A C T U A L TURN____ D O W N S O R D E F E R R ALS. OF L O A N A P P L I C A T I O N S ?__ ________________________

P r e s i d e n t M o o r h e a d t h e n r e a d I t e m II B a n d i n v i t e d c o m m e n t f r o m
the m e m b e r s .
An e x t e n d e d d i s c u s s i o n followed.
Som e m e m b e r s i n d i c a t e d that
there h a d b e e n a m o d e r a t e t i g h t e n i n g of l e n d i n g p o l i c i e s s i n c e l a s t
fall t h o u g h t h e p r e s s u r e t o r e s t r a i n b a n k c r e d i t e x p a n s i o n w a s l e s s e n e d
bec a u s e of t h e c o n t i n u e d g r o w t h of b a n k r e s e r v e s .
O n e or t w o m e m b e r s
expressed dou b t s that l e n d i n g p o l i c i e s have t ightened appreciably.
Others s t r o n g l y c o n t e n d e d , h o w e v e r , t h a t l o a n a p p l i c a t i o n s w h i c h p r e ­
v i o u s l y w o u l d h a v e r e c e i v e d f a v o r a b l e c o n s i d e r a t i o n are n o w b e i n g r e iected.
I T E M II C
C.

HO W H A V E RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AFFECTED THE ABILITY AND WILLINGN E S S O F B A N K S T.0 A T T R A C T F U N D S I N T H E C / D M A R K E T ?______________
The P r e s i d e n t o f t h e C o u n c i l

r e a d I t e m II C.

The d i s c u s s i o n d i s c l o s e d t h a t b a n k s in the m a j o r m o n e y c e n t e r s
are b i d d i n g a g g r e s s i v e l y f o r f u n d s in t h e C / D m a r k e t .
The total, h o w ­
ever, h a d g r o w n l i t t l e .
T h e r e is s o m e e v i d e n c e t h a t m a n y b a n k e r s are
re luctant to rrc h a s e u p " t h e r a t e s on C / P Ts.
As a r e s u l t , t h e l e n d i n g
policies of t h e s e i n s t i t u t i o n s p r o b a b l y w i l l t e n d to s t i f f e n .
Some
banks a p p a r e n t l y a l s o a r e s e r i o u s l y c o n s i d e r i n g l i q u i d a t i n g s o m e of
their i n v e s t m e n t s i n o r d e r to o b t a i n f u n d s to a c c o m m o d a t e b o r r o w i n g
customers.
I T E M II P
D.

PO M E M B E R S OF T H E C O U N C I L H A V E A N Y C OMM ENT S R E G A R P I N G THE
P R O P OSED- A M E N D M E N T S T O R E G U L A T I O N S D A N D Q A N N O U N C E D B Y
T H E B O A R D O N J A N U A R Y 20, 1 9 6 6 , T H A T WOULD. I N E F F E C T D E F I N E
" D E P O S I T S " F O R T H E P U R P O S E S OF T H O S E R E G U L A T I O N S A S I N ­
C L U D I N G P R O M I S S O R Y N O T E S A N D C E R T A I N O T H E R F O R M S OF I N D E B T E D N E S S O F M E M B E R B A N K S ? _____________________________________________________
P r e s i d e n t M o o r h e a d r e a d I t e m II D.

An e x t e n d e d d i s c u s s i o n d i s c l o s e d d i f f e r e n c e s of o p i n i o n in the
to.ncil.
A c c o r d i n g l y , it w a s d e c i d e d to i n d i c a t e to the B o a r d t hat
the C o u n c i l a p p r e c i a t e s t h e p r o b l e m s f a c i n g t h e m o n e t a r y a u t h o r i t i e s
the i s s u a n c e b y s o m e b a n k s of p r o m i s s o r y n o t e s of v e r y s h o r t
maturity.
The C o u n c i l , h o w e v e r , w o u l d n o t r e c i t e s p e c i f i c a l l y on the
Proposed a m e n d m e n t s b u t t h e
m e m b e r s w o u l d express their views orally
0r> outline t h e m i n w r i t i n g to t h e B o a r d .




K.
I T E M III
B A L A N C E OP P A Y M E N T S .
A.

H O W D O P S T H E C O U N C I L A P P R A I S E T H E S T R E N G T H OP F O R E I G N D E M A N D
POR U.S. B A N K F U N D S ?

B.

HAVE THE C O UNCIL’
S V I E W S O N T H E E F F E C T I V E N E S S OF T H E V O L U N T A R Y
F O R E I G N C R E D I T R E S T R A I N T P R O G R A M CHANGED M A T E R I A L L Y SINCE THE
COUNCIL M E T W I T H T H K BOARD IN NOVEMBER?
The P r e s i d e n t

of t h e C o u n c i l

t h e n r e a d I t e m I I I A a n d B.

S e v e r a l m e m b e r s r e p o r t e d t h a t t h e r e is e v i d e n c e of i n c r e a s i n g
s t r e n g t h of f o r e i g n d e m a n d f o r U . S . b a n k f u n d s a n d t h a t this d e m a n d
is l i k e l y to g r o w t h e l o n g e r t h e v o l u n t a r y r e s t r a i n t p r o g r a m c o n ­
tinues in f o r c e .
T h e r e a p p e a r s to b e l i t t l e e v i d e n c e in t h e C o u n c i l ’
s
j u d gment t h a t t h e e f f e c t i v e n e s s of the p r o g r a m h a s c h a n g e d m a t e r i a l l y
since N o v e m b e r .
It w a s d e c i d e d to e m p h a s i z e , h o w e v e r , t h a t the p r o g r a m
is e f f e c t i v e o n l y as a t e m p o r a r y m e a s u r e a n d n o t as a s o l u t i o n to the
basic p r o b l e m .
I T E M IV
W H A T A R E THE. C O U N C I L TS V I E W S
CURRENT CIRCUMSTANCES?

ON M O N E T A R Y A N D CREDIT P O L I C Y U N D E R

P r e s i d e n t M o o r h e a d r e a d I t e m I V w h i c h w a s f o l l o w e d b y an e x t e n d e d
d i s c u s s i o n In w h i c h m o s t m e m b e r s ’of t h e C o u n c i l p a r t i c i p a t e d .
It w a s f i n a l l y c o n c l u d e d t h a t the C o u n c i l w o u l d s t a t e t h a t as a
result of r e c e n t d e v e l o p m e n t s , a g g r e g a t e d e m a n d s a r e t a x i n g the n a t i o n !s
p r o d u c t i v e c a p a b i l i t i e s a n d t h a t i n f l a t i o n a r y p r e s s u r e s are a c c e l e r a t i n g
Unless t h e r e is a w i l l i n g n e s s to r i s k a s e r i o u s i n f l a t i o n , or the i m p o s i
tion of c o n t r o l s , a g g r e g a t e d e m a n d s m u s t b e m o d e r a t e d .
To a c c o m p l i s h
this o b j e c t i v e a n d t h u s l e s s e n t h e t h r e a t to p r i c e s t a b i l i t y , the
Council b e l i e v e s m o n e t a r y a n d f i s c a l m e a s u r e s m u s t b e e m p l o y e d .
The
Council, t h e r e f o r e , d e c i d e d to s u g g e s t to t h e B o a r d of G o v e r n o r s that
the a v a i l a b i l i t y of r e s e r v e s s h o u l d b e g r a d u a l l y r e d u c e d to m o r e m o d e s t
p r o p o r t i o n s t h r o u g h o p e n m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s a n d t h a t it a l s o m a y be
n e c e s s a r y to i n c r e a s e the d i s c o u n t r a t e a g a i n .
The C o u n c i l u r g e d a r e d u c t i o n in g o v e r n m e n t e x p e n d i t u r e s a n d n o t e d
that e v e n t u a l l y a n i n c r e a s e in t a x r a t e s a l s o m a y be r e q u i r e d .

The m e e t i n g a d j o u r n e d at 1 2 : ^ 0 P.M.




T H E C O U N C I L C O N V E N E D I N T H E B O A R D R O O M OP T H E F E D E R A L
R E S E R V E B U I L D I N G , W A S H I N G T O N , D . C . , A T 2 : 3 0 P.M. ON
F E B R U A R Y ll^, 1 9 6 6 .
A L L M E M B E R S OF T H E C O U N C I L W E R E
P R E S E N T E X C E P T M R . W I L L I A M L. D A Y .
M R . H O W A R D C.
P E T E R S E N , P R E S I D E N T , F I D E L I T Y - P H I L A D E L P H I A TRUST
C O M P A N Y , P H I L A D E L P H I A , P E N N S Y L V A N I A , A T T E N D E D AS A N
A L T E R N A T E F O R MR. D A Y .

M e m b e r s of the B o a r d Ts s t a f f i n c l u d i n g A l b e r t R. Koch, D e p u t y
Director, D i v i s i o n of R e s e a r c h and S t a t i s t i c s , a n d A* B. Hersey,
Adviser, D i v i s i o n of I n t e r n a t i o n a l F i n a n c e , p a r t i c i p a t e d in an a u d i o ­
visual p r e s e n t a t i o n on d o m e s t i c a n d i n t e r n a t i o n a l economic conditions.

T H E _ C O U N C I L R E C O N V E N E D - A T 5 :30 P . M . O N F E B R U A R Y llj., 1966,
IN T H K B O A R D R O O M OP T H E MADISON.
A L L M E M B E R S OP T H E
C O U N C I L W E R E P R E S E N T E X C E P T M R . W I L L I A M L. DAY .
M R . H O W A R D C. P E T E R S E N , P R E S I D E N T , F I D E L I T Y -P H I L A D E L P H I A
T R U S T C O M P A N Y , P H I L A D E L P H I A , P E N N S Y L V A N I A , A T T E N D E D AS AN
ALTERNATE.

The C o u n c i l p r e p a r e d a n d a p p r o v e d the a t t a c h e d C o n f i d e n t i a l
M e m o r a n d u m to be s e n t to the B o a r d of G o v e r n o r s r e l a t i v e to the
Agenda for the joint m e e t i n g of the C o u n c i l and the B o a r d on
February lf>, 1 9 6 6 .
T h e M e m o r a n d u m w a s d e l i v e r e d to the F e d e r a l
Reserve B u i l d i n g at 1 0 : 2 5 P,M. on .February 1L|_, 1 9 6 6 .
The m e e tin g a d jo u r n e d a t 6 ;5 0 P.M .




CONFIDENTIAL

MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FR'jM THE
FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
RELATIVE TO THE AGENDA FOR THE JOINT MEETING
ON FEBRUARY 15, 1966
1.

Economic conditions and prospects:
A.

How does the Council appraise prospects for
economic activity and for industrial prices
during the first half of 1966?

The Council anticipates a further rise in the level of
economic activity during the first half of 1966. This will reflect
1) a larger volume of consumer spending as incomes continue upward;
2) an expansion in capital investment as businessmen strive to
accommodate growing demands; 3) an increase in outlays by State
and local governments; and 4) a growth in expenditures by the
Federal Government for domestic programs and for military needs in
Southeast Asia. As these aggregate demands are likely to tax the
productive resources of the U.S. economy, upward pressures on
industrial prices seem certain to intensify.
B.

Have Council members observed any significant
changes in business plans for additions to
capacity or to inventories in response to the
generally more buoyant expectations now
prevalent?

Though it is difficult accurately to appraise and quantify
the change in business plans, the members of the Council believe that
businessmen generally are attempting to enlarge and modernize capacity
as rapidly as possible. In general, inventories appear to be reason­
ably well balanced. However, because of rising order backlogs and
lengthening delivery schedules, businessmen may seek to build
inventories more aggressively.
2.

Banking developments.
A.

What does the Council anticipate as to nearterm business demands for bank credit in
relation to usual seasonal needs? Is it
anticipated that an unusually large propor­
tion of these demands will be in the form of
term loans?

The Council anticipates strong near-term business demands
for bank credit in excess of the usual seasonal needs. These demands
are expected to cover all types of business borrowings including term




-2-

loans. There is some evidence that the tightness of credit in the
major money centers is tending to shift loans to banks in other
areas.
B.

How much tightening of bank lending policies
has taken place since last fall? To what
extent has such tightening extended to reduc­
tions in amounts of loans granted or to actual
turndowns or deferrals of loan applications?

Most members of the Council report a moderate tightening
of bank lending policies since last fall. The continued growth of
bank reserves tended to lessen the pressure to restrain bank credit
expansion. By and large, the tightening of credit is occurring on
a selective basis and some loans are being turned down.
C.

How have recent developments affected the
ability and willingness of banks to attract
funds in the CD market?

Recent developments have caused banks in the major money
centers to be even more aggressive in seeking funds in the CD market.
This competition for funds has forced rates higher in the last sixty
days. Despite the level of rates, the total outstanding has grown
only moderately. Moreover, as many suppliers of these funds
anticipate a further rise in interest rates, they presently are
reluctant to place them in CDs with long maturities.
D.

Do members of the Council have any comments
regarding the proposed amendments to Regulations
D and Q announced by the Board on January 20,
1966, that would in effect define "deposits"
for the purposes of those regulations as in­
cluding promissory notes and certain other
forms of indebtedness of member banks?

The Council appreciates the problems which are involved
in the issuance of promissory notes especially of very short
maturity. The many aspects of this matter preclude adequate
discussion within the limitations of this memorandum. Members of
the Council may express their views orally or communicate in writing
with the Board.
3.

Balance of payments.
A.

How does the Council appraise the strength
of foreign demand for U.S. bank funds?

The Council believes there is evidence of increasing strength
of foreign demand for U.S. bank funds. This demand is likely to grow




-3stronger the longer the v o l u n t a r y foreign credit restraint program
continues in force.

B.

Have the Council's views on the effective­
ness of tir.e voluntary foreign credit restraint
program changed materially since the Council
met with the Board in November?

In the Council's judgment, the effectiveness of the voluntary
foreign credit restraint program has not changed materially since
the Council met with the Board in November. However, the program
is effective only as a temporary measure and not a solution to the
basic problem.
4.

What are the Council's views on monetary and credit
policy under current circumstances?

In the last ninety days, the resources of the nation have
neared maximum utilization. Despite continuing additions to plant
capacity, output is pressing on capacity in many important industries,
and there are increasing reports of tight labor situations, particularly
of skilled workers. These developments reflect also the nation's
growing involvement in Southeast Asia. As a consequence, aggregate
demands are taxing the nation's productive capabilities with accelerating
inflationary pressures. Unless there is a willingness to risk a serious
inflation, or the imposition of contiols, aggregate demands must be
moderated. To accomplish this objective and thus lessen the threat to
price stability, the Council believes that monetary policy must be
employed. To be specific, the availability of reserves should be
gradually reduced to more modest proportions through open market
operations. In all likelihood it may also be necessary to increase
the discount rate again.
The Council recognizes that monetary policy alone may not
be adequate to meet present economic pressures. Fiscal policy
involving a reduction in governmental expenditures is required, and an
eventual increase in tax rates may also be necessary




6.
ON F E B R U A R Y l5, 1 9 6 6 , A T 1 0 : 3 0 A . M . , T H E F E D E R A L A D V I S O R Y
COUNCIL. H E L D A JOINT. M E E T I N G W I T H THE. B O A R D OF G O V E R N O R S
O F T H E F E D E R A L R E S E R V E S Y S T E M IN T H E F E D E R A L R E S E R V E
BUILDING, W A S H I N G T O N , D.C.
A L L M E M B E R S OF T H E C O U N C I L
W E R E PRESENT. E X C E P T M R . W I L L I A M L. DAY .
MR. H O W A R D C.
PETERSEN, P R E S I D E N T , F I D E L I T Y - P H I L A D E L P H I A TRUST COMPANY,
P H I L A D E L P H I A , P E N N S Y L V A N I A , A T T E N D E D AS A N A L T E R N A T E .
T H E F O L L O W I N G M E M B E R S OF T H E B O A R D
OF G O V E R N O R S W E R E
PRESENT:
CHAIRMAN MARTIN, V I C E CHAIRMAN BALDERSTON,
GOVERNORS ROBERTSON, SHEPARDSON, MITCHELL, DAANE AND
M A I S E L . MR. S H E R M A N , S E C R E T A R Y , A N D M R . K E N Y O N ,
A S S I S T A N T S E C R E T A R Y , OF T H E B O A R D OF G O V E R N O R S A LSO W ERE
PRESENT.
T h e m i n u t e s of t h e j o i n t m e e t i n g are b e i n g p r e p a r e d in t h e o f f i c e
of the S e c r e t a r y of t h e B o a r d of G o v e r n o r s of t h e F e d e r a l R e s e r v e
System.
T h e i r c o n t e n t w i l l b e c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e n o t e s of the S e c r e ­
tary of the C o u n c i l .
A s s u m i n g t h e y are in s u b s t a n t i a l a g r e e m e n t , t h e y
will be r e p r o d u c e d a n d d i s t r i b u t e d to t h e m e m b e r s of the C o u n c i l .
The m e e t i n g a d j o u r n e d at 1 2 : 1 5 P.M.

The n e x t m e e tin g o f th e C o u n c il w i l l be h e ld on June 20-21, 1966