View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

911

A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System was held in Washington on Saturday, September 3, 1938, at 11:30
a•

PRESENT:

Mr. Szymczak
Mr. Draper
Mr. Morrill, Secretary

The action stated with respect to each of the matters hereinafter referred to was taken by the Board:
Letter to the Presidents of all Federal reserve banks, prepared
15111"suent to the action taken at the meeting of the Board on August 31,
19381 and reading as follows:
"From time to time since the adoption of Regulation
0, Loans to Executive Officers of Member Banks, the Board
of Governors has been asked to modify the regulation in
so far as it applies to officers of member banks who do
not participate in the executive management or lending
activities of the banks except in their capacity as directors. Usually the situation presented has been that of
a prominent individual in the community who holds an office such as that of president or vice president of the
bank but who is entirely inactive in the management of
the institution. The Board has uniformly taken the position,
for reasons with which you are familiar, that the definition of executive officer as contained in Regulation 0 applies to inactive as well as active officers of the banks.
"The Board is considering suggestions as to solutions
of the problem which would, on the one hand, meet as far
as practicable the criticisms that have been made of the
Regulation and, on the other hand, not contravene the general
Purpose of the provisions of the law relating to loans to
executive officers. Therefore, the Board would like to be
informed as to the extent or importance of the problem in
Your Federal reserve district, whether in your judgment
it would be desirable to modify the Regulation, and if in
Your opinion the problem is one of a character which makes




912
9/3/38

-2-

"it desirable to amend the Regulation, your suggestions as
to the change that should be made.
"In this connection, the Board has before it suggestions that there be exempted from the definition of 'executive officer' as contained in subsection 1(b) of the
Regulation (1) any person who does not actually participate
in the management of the bank and who is denied authority
to do so by express provisions in the bank's by-laws or by
resolution of the board of directors or (2) any person who
does not actually participate in the management of the bank
and who is denied authority to do so by express provision
In the bank's by-laws or by resolution of the board of
directors, provided that the title by which his position
Is described includes the word 'honorary' or the word
'inactive'. Drafts of amendments which would carry out
these suggestions are attached.
"There may be other suggestions which in your opinion
would be preferable. It will be appreciated if you will
advise the Board as to your views on this subject before the
end of September."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Presidents of all Federal reserve banks, reading
as follows:
"This supersedes previous letters regarding the classification, in reports of examination, of depreciation in
securities.
"The division of securities into four groups for examination purposes was recognized in the agreement regarding
examination procedure announced by the Secretary of the
Treasury and published in the July Bulletin. The definitions of the four groups as given on page 8 of the revised
form of report of examination, recently sent out to the
Federal reserve banks, are in conformity with the agreement
and are not here repeated in detail.
"All issues of bonds in default, either as to principal or interest, are to be included in Group 3.
"With respect to other general market obligations, the
agreement provides that issues in the four highest grades
are to be included in Group 1 and that issues below the
four highest grades are to be included in Group 2. In
case of doubt as to the classification of a particular




913

9/3/38

-3-

"rated issue, the examiners should, before final determination of classification, take into consideration the
available credit data as well as the ratings of more than
one investment service.
"The agreement specifically recognizes that unrated
securities (not in default) shall be classed as Group 1 or
Group 2 in accordance with the quality of the respective
issues. In determining whether or not an unrated security
Is distinctly or predominantly speculative, consideration
Should be given to the record of the issue, other credit
data available, and the comparative classification of
rated issues of similar quality.
"As stated in the agreement and as indicated in the
revised form of examination report, Group 1 securities are
not to be priced in the report either individually or in
total, and no appreciation or depreciation in such securities is to be Shown in the report.
"Group 2 securities are to be valued at the average
market price for the 18 months preceding the examination.
It is expected that average prices for 18 month periods
Will be shown in the publications of the various investment services and will appear about the middle of each
month beginning with September. In the interest of uniformity, average prices as so published should be the basis
for the valuation of Group 2 securities, and the figures
Published in one month should be used until publication
Of the averages in the following month. Pending the first
Publication of such averages, averages obtained from other
sources believed to be reliable may be used. If not otherwise available, the averages should be computed by the
Federal reserve bank by taking the simple average of the
high price and low price for the period.
"The net depreciation in Group 2 securities, based on
the average prices, should be included in Classification
III in the recapitulation of classified assets on page 3
Of the report of examination. Inasmuch as 50 per cent of
Classification III is deducted in arriving at the total of
adjusted capital, such classification will conform to the
Provisions of the agreement that 50 per cent of the depreciation in Group 2 securities, based on the 18 month average,
be deducted in arriving at the net capital position.
"Group 3 and Group 4 securities, i.e., defaulted bonds
and stocks, are to be priced on the basis of current market
quotations and the net depreciation in the two groups combined is to be classified as IV. In other words, for the




914

9/3/38

-4-

"purpose of computing depreciation to be classified as
estimated loss, Groups 3 and 4 are to be regarded as one
group.
"In the case a bank has established a valuation reserve or made an unallocated charge-off against the total
account rather than against specific issues, such valuation
reserve or unallocated charge-off should be considered as
aPplying first to Groups 3 and 4 securities and then to
Group 2 securities, thus reducing, to the extent of such
reserves or unallocated charge-off, the amount of depreciation subject to classification as IV or III.
"The agreement also refers to the establishment and
maintenance of adequate reserves. If analysis of the list
of securities indicates that a bank is faced with serious
Problems and probable future losses in its investment account, comment should be made as to the situation and the
adequacy of the reserves to provide for the write-off of
depreciation should impending defaults materialize and to
take care of losses realized in making shifts in the portfolio as opportunity permits in order to achieve a better
balance and stronger position.
"The agreement recognizes that profits from the sale
Of securities should not be regarded as ordinary or recurring income and that, until losses have been written off
and adequate reserves established, such profits should not
be used for any purpose other than to provide for chargeoffs or reserves. Accordingly it is suggested that the
answer to question 4 on page 6 of the examination report
Include a statement as to the amount of net profits from
the sale of securities since previous examination and the
disposition of such profits."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Charles F. Zimmerman, c/o First National Bank,
lilultingdon, Pennsylvania, reading as follows:
"Mr. McKee has brought to the attention of the other
members of the Board the copy of the letter of August 11
addressed to the Comptroller of the Currency which you sent
him with special reference to Regulation F of the Board of
Governors. Mr. McKee told the Board that in response to
an invitation which he extended to you in August 1936 to
came to Washington and present your views to members of




915
9/3/38

-5-

"the Board, you indicated that it was expected that studies
would be made by a committee of the Trust Company Section
of the Pennsylvania Bankers Association of criticisms of
Regulation 1 and that when these studies had been made a
committee would came to Washington for the purpose of presenting the results. Since then, as you know, the Committee on Mortgage Investment Funds of the Trust Company
Section of your Association has presented its proposals
With respect to a new form of common trust funds to be
Provided for by amendment to Regulation F but the Board
has not been advised of any other suggestions that the
Section might have to offer regarding the Regulation.
"In view of the fact that your correspondence indicates that you feel very strongly that Regulation F should
be amended and the Board's desire always to give consideration to any constructive suggestions regarding its
regulations, the Board has asked me to advise you that
it would be glad to receive a committee of trust men of
the Pennsylvania Bankers Association for the purpose of
considering any criticisms and suggestions that they may
feel should be presented or to have you came to Washington
for that purpose. To that end it will be appreciated if
You will indicate when it would be convenient for such
a committee or yourself to came to Washington and the
Board will be glad to fix a time for this purpose."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. S. L. Andrew, Chief Statistician, American Telephone
and Telegraph Company, New York, New York, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of August 22 in which you
suggest that the Board's weekly member bank press statement be amended so as to restore the segregation of 'Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans' and 'Other
loans' into loans 'On securities' and loans 'Otherwise
secured and unsecured'.
"As indicated in your letter, the Board in May 1937
revised the form of the weekly member bank condition rePart so as to provide a functional classification of loans,
to replace the former classification which was based generally on type of collateral. The reporting banks were
requested, however, to report a break-down of two of the
new classes of loans into loans 'On securities' and loans




91E
9/3/38

-6-

"Otherwise secured and unsecured'. That made it possible
for your organization, as well as other users of the statistics, to continue the former series for the time being in
view of its value for long-time comparisons. There are
same inherent defects in the old series which make it undesirable to perpetuate it, particularly now that the new
and improved series has been available for over a year
and has provided a sufficient overlap for making an adequate comparison between the old and new series. The old
series of 'Loans on securities' was generally used as a
measure of borrowings for the purpose of purchasing and
carrying securities, but in fact the figures included a
substantial and, no doubt, varying proportion of loans on
securities made for other purposes. They were not, therefore, nearly as suited to the use made of them as the new
classification which, among other things, is specifically
designed to reflect loans made for the purpose of purchasing
and carrying securities. The old series of 'All other
loans' was generally used as a measure of borrowings for
commercial and industrial purposes, but in fact it included
real estate loans, loans to domestic and foreign banks,
and other non-business loans.
"The discontinuance of the segregation in question
not only has simplified and improved the Board's weekly
statement but will also make it possible for the member
banks to simplify the loan records upon which their weekly
reports are partly based. Early revisions of both the
weekly report and the quarterly call report are now under
consideration, and it will be impossible to continue the
former series of total 'Loans on securities' and 'All
Other loans' from the proposed revised loan classification. So long, however, as the desired segregation is
reported to the Board, an estimate of the total amounts
Of 'Loans on securities' and 'All other loans' of weekly
reporting banks will be furnished to you monthly upon
telephone request to the Board's Division of Bank Operations.
"The change that has already been made in the weekly
statement and the changes contemplated in the call report
Will further focus the attention of readers of the statement on the purpose of loans made by member banks and will
reduce correspondingly the attention that may have been
paid to the type of collateral. This seems to the Board
to be desirable, and it has been our experience over the




917
9/3/38

-7-

"Past year that the new classification of loans is much
superior to the former one. In the circumstances the Board
does not feel justified in restoring the segregation in
question, although your views have been given careful consideration. It is hoped that you will appreciate that
the Board's action was taken with a view to improving the
type of banking statistics and at the same time reducing
the burden imposed upon member banks in preparing reports."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Fleming, President of the Federal Reserve Bank
or Cleveland, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of August 22, with which
YOU inclosed a copy of a letter you received from Mr. John
M. Daiger, Financial Adviser of the Federal Housing Administration, dated August 18, in which he asked you to
obtain, through such banking and credit sources as are
available to you, confidential reports on certain named
individuals.
"In response to your inquiry as to the reaction of
the Board relative to your procuring such information for
the benefit of other than member banks, it is the opinion
of the Board that when requests are received from Governmental agencies for such information the Federal Reserve
bank should comply with them so far as practicable. In
furnishing credit information with respect to individuals
or companies to Governmental agencies, however, it is assumed that you would advise the agencies that you are
furnishing the information for their confidential use and
that while you believe the information to be correct, you
cannot guarantee its accuracy."




Approved unanimously.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.