View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

69

Minutes for

To:

Members of the Board

From:

Office of the Secretary

September 28, 1966

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
With respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard to
the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will advise
the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, please initial
below. If you were present at the meeting, your
initials will indicate approval of the minutes. If
You were not present, your initials will indicate
only that you have seen the minutes.

Chm. Martin
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. Mitchell
Gov. Daane
Gov. Maisel
Gov. Brimmer

Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System on Wednesday, September 28, 1966.

The Board met in the Board

Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Robertson, Vice Chairman
Shepardson
Mitchell
Maisel
Brimmer
Sherman, Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Broida, Assistant Secretary
Bakke, Assistant Secretary
Holland, Adviser to the Board
Solomon, Adviser to the Board
Cardon, Legislative Counsel
Fauver, Assistant to the Board
Brill, Director, Division of Research and
Statistics
Mr. Solomon, Director, Division of Examinations
Mr. Hexter, Associate General Counsel
Mr. O'Connell, Assistant General Counsel
Mr. Daniels, Assistant Director, Division of
Bank Operations
Mr. Leavitt, Assistant Director, Division of
Examinations
Mrs. Semia, Technical Assistant, Office of the
Secretary
Mr. Forrestal, Senior Attorney, Legal Division
Messrs. Egertson and Maguire, Supervisory Review
Examiners, Division of Examinations
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Approved letters.

The following letters were approved unanimously

fter consideration of background information that had been made available
to the Board.

Copies of the letters are attached under the respective

item numbers indicated.
Item No.
i.ietter to Central Trust Company, Rochester, New
(
i)
irk, aPproving the establishment of a branch in
t
c?.1/illage of Webster and commenting on the bank's
-Pltal position.

1

9/28/66

-2Item No.

Letter to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regarding the application of Stock Growers'
Bank of Wheatland, Wheatland, Wyoming, for continuation of deposit insurance after withdrawal
from membership in the Federal Reserve System.
Reports on competitive factors.

2

A report to the Comptroller

of the Currency on the competitive factors involved in the proposed
Purchase of assets and assumption of liabilities of Duquesne City Bank,
Dug uesne, Pennsylvania, by Western Pennsylvania National Bank, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, was approved unanimously for transmittal to the Comptroller.
The conclusion read as follows:
The proposed purchase of Duquesne City Bank by Western
Pennsylvania National Bank, Pittsburgh, would eliminate existing and potential competition and would further the trend in
the area towards elimination of locally headquartered banks
through merger or similar transaction. The overall effect of
the proposal on competition appears adverse.
A report to the Comptroller of the Currency on the competitive
factors involved in the proposed merger of Onaway State Bank, Onaway,
Michigan, and The Citizens National Bank of Cheboygan, Cheboygan, Michigan,
unanimously for transmittal to the Comptroller.
sion

The conclu-

stated that the proposed merger would not have adverse competitive

effects.
Status of agency issues (Item No. 3).

Among the provisions of

l'ublic Law 89-597, approved on September 21, 1966, was an amendment to
section 14(b) of the Federal Reserve Act empowering the Federal Reserve

9/28/66

-3-

Banks "to buy and sell in the open market, under the direction and regulation of the Federal Open Market Committee, any obligation which is a
direct obligation of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest
by, any agency of the United States."

The amendment also affected the

a uthority of the Reserve Banks to make advances to member banks pursuant
to the eighth paragraph of section 13 of the Act, on specified collateral,
including "such notes, drafts, bills of exchange, or bankers' acceptances
as are eligible .

. for purchase by Federal reserve banks .

."

In

1960 and 1962 the Board had published interpretations relating to the
kinds of paper that fell within the language of the eighth paragraph of
section 13.

In essence, the Board's position was that the terms used in

the paragraph related only to obligations arising out of commercial or
agricultural transactions, and that certain obligations, although called
notes," were
really in the nature of securities and were not eligible
as

collateral for advances under that paragraph.
There had now been distributed a draft of letter to the Federal

4serve Banks that would point out that to the extent that agency obligati°ue now eligible for open market purchase constituted "notes, drafts,
bills of exchange, or bankers' acceptances" within the meaning of the
eighth paragraph of section 13, they would be eligible as collateral for
advances
under that paragraph.

the 1960

However, the draft letter would refer to

and 1962 interpretations that had in effect excluded investment

securities from eligibility, and would state that even though such

9/28/66

-4-

obligations might be called "notes" they were not the kind of notes
contemplated and therefore were not eligible collateral.
Governor Maisel raised the question whether it might not be
desirable, instead of reaffirming the 1960 and 1962 interpretations, to
reexamine the matter and determine whether it would be feasible to follow
a basic concept that paper eligible for purchase under section 14(b) was
also eligible as collateral for advances to member banks under the eighth
Paragraph of section 13.

He had misgivings about continuing to follow

interpretations that depended upon a definition of "notes" conforming to

the practice of many years ago.
Governor Maisel also commented that he found it rather difficult
to interpret the true intent of the Congress in passing the recent legis-

lation.

The Congress, he suggested, might have concluded that if agency

issues were made eligible for purchase under section 14, eligibility
"der section 13 automatically followed and amendment of section 13 was
not necessary.

Further, it seemed to him there was an inconsistency in

saying that a certain agency issue could be purchased by a Reserve Bank
from a Government securities dealer under a repurchase agreement but that
member bank could not offer the same paper as collateral for an advance
under the eighth paragraph of section 13.

A member bank could, of course,

°bt in an advance on such collateral under section 10(b), but only at a
Penalty

rate.
Question then was raised as to the status of the legislation

re

°mmanded by the Board that would permit a member bank to borrow from

9/28/66

-5-

its Reserve Bank on the security of any sound assets without paying a
Penalty rate of interest.

The response was that there seemed to be some

Prospect of action at the current session of the Congress, and it was
noted that the passage of such legislation would eliminate the problem
currently under consideration by the Board.

This led to the question

Whether, in these circumstances, any action need be taken by the Board
at this time.

Mr. Rolland mentioned the desirability of achieving uni-

formity in the handling of questions likely to be presented at the
discount

windows.

After further discussion a consensus developed in favor of
advising the Reserve Banks that questions arising at the discount windows
should be handled according to the outstanding interpretations, but with
the understanding that if the pending discount legislation was not acted
Upon at
this session of the Congress the Board would review the whole
matter.
Accordingly, unanimous approval was given to a letter to the
Pederal

Reserve Banks in the form attached as Item No. 3.
kl2posed System film (Item No. 4).

Governor Mitchell referred

to recommendations by a Subcommittee of the Presidents' Conference
C°mmittee on Bank and Public Relations regarding the preparation of a
441

film on the Federal Reserve System.

At its meeting on September 12,

1966, the Conference authorized an expenditure not in excess of $125,000
f°r this purpose, with the cost to be shared by the Federal Reserve Banks

9/28/66

-6-

on a pro rata basis, and delegated the function of overseeing the progress
of the work to the Committee on Bank and Public Relations.
Governor Mitchell commented that the Board had not participated
actively in the preparation of the most recent System film (Money on the
Move) until a substantial amount of money had been spent and the project
was rather far advanced.

In his view the film was less than satisfactory

in a number of respects, and he was rather pessimistic about the prospects
for the proposed film on the basis of his understanding of the manner in
which it was proposed that the project be carried forward.

He felt that

Lt would
be prudent to spend more for a satisfactory film than less for
an unsatisfactory one; and in order to produce a film that would convey
an effective System message it seemed advisable to retain the best available Professional talent.

Unless an approach was followed that gave promise

of achieving a high-quality product, he would prefer to see the project
dropped.
The discussion that followed reflected general agreement with
Governor Mitchell's comments and concurrence in his view that the treatments suggested by the Subcommittee were not promising as a basis for a
film that would convey an effective System message.
Accordingly, it was agreed that the Chairman of the Presidents'
Conference
should be advised (1) of the Board's view on the need to emphaSize producing a film of high quality, even though a somewhat greater
el3st might be involved, and (2) of Governor Mitchell's availability to

9/28/66

-7-

discuss the subject in more detail with representatives of the Conference.
A copy of the letter subsequently sent to the Chairman of the Presidents'
Conference is attached as Item No. 4.
Public Bank matter (Item No. 5).

Mr. Leavitt reported conversa-

tions with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and staff of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation regarding a reported continuing deterioration
in the condition of Public Bank, Detroit, Michigan.

The Board last week

had approved, on an emergency basis, the merger of Public Bank into Bank
of the Conuaonwealth, also of Detroit, but for various reasons it appeared
that the merger would not be consummated for some days to come.

In the

Illeantime there was a question regarding continued assistance to Public
Bank through the discount window of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
The Reserve Bank, at the request of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporahad been making advances to Public Bank on direct obligations of

the U.S. under the authority of the last paragraph of section 13 of the
Federal Reserve Act, but it appeared that the bank might soon exhaust its
he'ldings of Government obligations that could be offered as collateral.
°Ile possibility would be for the Reserve Bank to make advances to Bank of

the Commonwealth on the security of assets of Public Bank and for the
be

of Public Bank provided Bank of the Conutionwealth was clearly

liable for the amount of the advances.

This procedure would require the

13')ard's approval under the eighth paragraph of section 19 of the Federal
Reserve Act.

9/28/66

-8After discussion of available information concerning the condi-

tion of Public Bank and consideration of possible alternatives, it was
suggested that the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago be authorized, if
Public Bank exhausted its holdings of Government obligations that could
be used as collateral and until such time as the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation might declare the bank insolvent or take other action, to
'flake advances or loans to Bank of the Commonwealth for the benefit or
Use of Public Bank secured by assets of the latter, provided such assets
bore the signature or endorsement of Bank of the Commonwealth or that
bank was otherwise clearly liable for the amount of the advance or loan.
It was also suggested that one of the directors of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation be contacted before such authorization was given
to the Reserve Bank.
It was agreed unanimously that the suggested procedure should be
f°110wed.

Attached to these minutes as Item No. 5 is a copy of the

te1egram sent later in the day to President Scanlon after advice that
Such

authorization was proposed to be given had been provided to the

deral Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The meeting then adjourned.
Secretary's Note: Governor Shepardson
today approved on behalf of the Board
a telegram to the Federal Reserve Bank
of Atlanta (copy attached as Item No. 6)
approving the designation of Powell G.
Blue as special assistant examiner.

(LA-1,A

A

Secretary

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Item No. 1
9/28/66

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
*00/1elle

orriciAL commesPoNocmcc
TO THE !BOARD

September 28, 1966

Board of Directors,
Central Trust Company, Rochester, N.Y.,
Rochester, New York.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System approves the establishment by Central Trust
Company, Rochester, N.Y., Rochester, New York, of a
branch at 195 Min Street West, Village of Webster,
Monroe County, New York, provided the branch is
established within one year from the date of this
letter.
The Board notes that your bank's capital position is somewhat less than satisfactory and understands
that consideration is being given to the sale of new
stock in 1967.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke

Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.
(The letter to the Reserve Bank stated that the
Board also had approved a six-month extension
of the period allowed to establish the branch;
and that if an extension should be requested,
the procedure prescribed in the Board's letter
of November 9, 1962 (S-1846), should be followed.)

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 2
9/28/66

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

September 28, 1966

The Honorable K. A. Randall, Chairman,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
Washington, D. C. 20429
Dear Mr. Randall:
Reference is made to your letter of September 21,
of
1966, concerning the application of Stock Growers' Bank
deposit
Wheatland, Wheatland, TAYoming, for continuance of
insurance after withdrawal from membership in the Federal
Reserve System.
There have been no corrective programs urged
Upon the bank, or agreed to by it, which have not been
fully consummated, and there are no programs that the
Board would advise be incorporated as conditions of admitting the bank to membership in the Corporation as a
nonmember of the Federal Reserve System.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke
Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 3
9/28/66

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

September 30, 1966.

ear sir:

1966, amended
Public Law 89-597, approved September 21,
the powers of
!ection 14(b) of the Federal Reserve Act, relating to
4eaerve Banks, by adding the following provision:
the
"To buy and sell in the open market, under
t
Marke
al Open
direction and regulations of the Feder
ation
oblig
Committee, any obligation which is a direct
by,
of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest
any agency of the United States."
ted in the enclosed
The purposes of this amendment are indica
ncy Committee
Curre
excerpt from the report of the Senate Banking and
°tI the bill that became P.L. 89-597.
Market Committee
Regardless of whether the Federal Open
deo
the amendment to
n '-ues to initiate operations in agency issues,
Banks to make advances
ction 14(b) expands the authority of Reserve
That paraarltItallant to the eighth paragraph of section 13 of the Act.
on
banks
member
to
a,"h Permits Reserve Banks to make advances
exchange,
of
bills
s,
draft
(reified collateral, including "such notes,
al
Feder
by
se
purcha
for
hankers' acceptances as are eligible . . .
'eserve banks".
that only those
The Board has previously taken the position
are eligible as
n
ratio
enume
inds of paper that fall within the quoted
!
ded as
regar
ally
gener
s
llateral to advances, and that obligation
are not
s",
"note
called
thvestment securities, although they may be
ore are
theref
and
13
on
1.11c:et kind of obligations contemplated by secti
al
Feder
(1960
.
under
Re eligible as collateral to advances there
light
In
690)
tin
Bulle
of8erve Bulletin 151; 1962 Federal Reserve
reconsider
the recent amendment to section 14, the Board plans to

Z

-2on
position on this matter in the event that pending legislati
on
the
Banks
uhich would permit member banks to borrow from Reserve
,
Meanwhile
law.
into
security of any acceptable assets is not enacted
l
collatera
as
issues
inquiries concerning the eligibility of agency
to advances should be answered in accordance with the Board i a published
interpretations.
ita

Very truly your

Merritt Sheri/ma,
Secretary.
EncloSure

TO THE PRESIDENTS OF ALL FEDERAL

RESERVE BANKS.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 4

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

9/28/66

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADORCOM

orriciAL

OORRICIIPONOIENCC

TO THE IBOARO

September 29, 1966.

Mr. Edward A. Wayne, Chairman,
Conference of Presidents
of the Federal Reserve Banks,
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond,
Richmond, Virginia. 23213
Dear Mr. Wayne:
Item 5 in the summary of topics submitted by the
Conference of Presidents following its meeting on September 12
indicated that the Conference would like to determine the views
of the Board on the proposal for preparation of a new System
film on monetary policy.
From the tentative minutes of that meeting, the Board
gathers that some members of the Conference had reservations about
undertaking such a project unless the job was done with professional
competence. The Board strongly concurs in that view. It believes
that once the general subject matter has been determined and a
decision made to go forward with another System film, the best
ProfessiOnal talent available should be enlisted for assistance
at all stages of the project. This approach may involve greater
cost than otherwise, but it is also more likely to assure the
Production of an attractive film that will convey a pertinent,
timely message.
While the Board feels that the photographic work on the
most recent film was effectively handled, it believes that the
Choice of subject matter and the treatment thereof were less than
satisfactory. In the Board's view, more attention should be given
to the preparation of a top-quality scenario in any future effort.
Along the same lines, the Board has some reservations as to whether
the combination of film treatments recommended by the Committee on
Bank and Public Relations would offer the best possibilities for
the development of an effective System message on monetary policy.

Mr. Edward A. Wayne

-2-

As you will recall, Governor Mitchell worked closely
with representatives of the Presidents' Conference at certain
stages in the editing of the previous System film. The Board
has asked him to make himself available to the Conference for
discussion of fundamental considerations that the Board believes
to be of paramount concern in the production of another film.
Governor Mitchell will be glad to enter into such discussions at
the convenience of such representatives of the Conference as you
may designate for the purpose.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

36
Item No. 5
9/28/66

RAM
.TELEG
WIRE SERVICIt
LICAIIED

SYSTEM
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE
WASHINGTON

September 28, 1966.

Scanlon - Chicago.
nt to
In response to telephone request of Helmer, and pursua
of Regulation A,
Section 19 of Federal Reserve Act and Section 201.5
o to accept
Board today authorized Federal Reserve Bank of Chicag
wealth,
as security for advances or loans to Bank of the Common
Public Bank, Detroit,
Detroit, Michigan, for the benefit or use of
assets bear the
Michigan, assets of Public Bank, provided such
Commonwealth or Bank of the
signature or endorsement of Bank of the
for the amount of the
Commonwealth is otherwise clearly liable
advance or loan.

.
This telegram will be confirmed by letter
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Sherman

TELEGRAM
LEASED WIRE SERVICE

Item No. 6
9/28/66

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON
September 28, 1966.
SHEFFER - ATLANTA
Reurtel September 27, 1966, Board approves designation of
Powell G. Blue as special assistant examiner for Federal
Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

(Signed) Elizabeth L. Carmicheal

ELIZABETH L. CARMICHAEL