View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

A meeting
of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

sYstet
and the
Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks was held in
Waahta
gt°r1 on Wednesday,
September 27, 1950, at 2:30 p.m.

PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

McCabe, Chairman
Eccles
Szymczak
Evans
Vardaman
Norton
Powell
Mr. Carpenter, Secretary

Messrs. Erickson, Sproul, 4Villiams, Gidney, Leach,
McLarin, Young, Davis, Peyton, Leedy, Gilbert,
and Earhart, Presidents of the Federal Reserve
Banks of Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicagb, St. Louis,
Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, and San Francisco, respectively.
Mr. Van Nice, Secretary of the Presidents'
Conference
Bet,
°re this meeting there were distributed among the members
Or the Boa

(4 4.
K/Pics

rd of Governors and the Presidents
copies of a memorandum
he

Presidents wished to discuss with the Board at

keetin,.
at
eet f

The
ow.
topics and the discussion in connection with each

orth bel

11 Illte
ro .ration of
Retiremen:b System benefits with those
0,0;
1 1.1-fled under the amended Social Securit Act. The
draft
Of aerenee of Presidents gave consideration Retirement
.
to the
Co
rePort dated September 8, 1950, of the
for . tee of the Retirement System presenting aprogram
beri.n3i:ntegration of Retirement System benefits with the
The-:its provided
under the amended Social Security Act.
tire;ePo
was made to the Board of Trustees of the Rrt ekatt;!Ilt SYstem and was presented to the Presidents as
-' of information for their discussion and sugges Ions.




:r7$1
9127/5o
-2.The
The Presidents expressed approval of the Retirement
co
recommendations, as set forth in the report
with the
suggestion that the wording of the provision that
"members who attain age 65 during or subsequent to
the month in which the new Social Security law was
adopted and prior to July 1, 1952, be given the
Privilege (in the discretion of the employing banks)
of remaining in active service until July 1, 1952,
lh order that they may qualify for Social Security
benefits." (Pages 6 - 7)
be
i,amended by striking the words "was adopted" and substitutg therefor the words "becomes effective for Federal Reserve
"-----S.Z.,2,yilloees
ni
(January 71.931)".
In suggesting this amendment the Presidents agreed that
the r
etention past their regular retirement dates of employees
thZeaoh age 65 prior to January 1, 1951, in order to make
eni7 eligible for Social Security benefits (through covered
siP'°Yment for 18 months thereafter) was difficult of defense
w;nce at their regular dates of retirement these persons
It Washave made no contributions to the Social Security System.
of "as felt, however, that there may be some special cases
1Werit where employees reaching age 65 before January 1,
,
.')
-1 might, if agreeable to all concerned, be continued in
em
bX°YMent in order to become eligible for Social Security
ts. The Conference arranged to have copies of the
all
ofer,Ided draft of the report sent to the members of the Board
IneXvernors for their consideration prior to the joint
lng of the Board with the Presidents.
Tru 4The Presidents suggest that a special meeting of the
es of the Retirement System to consider the Retirement
Com
,?e l s recommendations be called at the first convenient
datelt
meoi.wu-Lch probably would be at the time of the December
lik,„111g of the Conference. If possible, the Presidents would
mee.-t.60 have the date of such a meeting set at the joint
Boa Ing. The Presidents would also like to discuss with the
zeard the desirability of preparing a booklet or some other
elliZ of communication through which Federal Reserve Bank
Seo2
ees might be informed of the implications of Social
t
ace;i4e.tyt000z.age
and of the added benefits which will
FolioWing

a statement by Mr. Peyton in which he gave the back-




AM

9127/5o
—317°1111ci for the action of the Presidents' Conference, Chairman McCabe
stated that
the recommendations of the Retirement Committee as ap1)1.°Ited by the
Presidents would be given consideration by the Board of
C"erhers and the
Presidents advised in ample time for action on the
katter by
the Board
of Trustees of the Retirement System at a meeting
tc)be held
before the end of the year. In this connection, Chairman
Nrton
inTlired as to the date for the next meeting of the Presidents'
Oont4rellee
and the Board
at which time it would be expected that the
Itieet'illg of
the Board
of Trustees would be held. It was suggested that
the
date be
determined at the end of the meeting of the Federal Open
Ilarket
Committee to be held tomorrow.
the

There was general agreement that, if the recommendations of

Retirement Committee
were put into effect, the preparation of a
booklet
fully and
be h.
effectively explaining the plan of integration would
IghlY
desirable.
2.
4artim
a re e rotection of records. The Conference considered
,
3„°rt, dated August
best1
of the Subcommittee on
Oper
tion of Records to the Committee on Miscellaneous
whicTi
ns which presented two alternative plans under
or
limited emergency operations might be carried on by,
pre
;
11.
1 behalf of, a Federal Reserve Bank or branch whose
lilt,h;c3es might become unusable as a result of war damage.
pree'ugh not recommending the activation of either plan at
be i nt) the Subconmijttee made certain recommendations to
of r7ediately adopted including selection by each Bank
sele 11Y located storage space for vital Bank records,
nd to1c/n of personnel to catalog and control such records
aet in behalf of the Bank in emergency, a five-week
,
riaa,
Resel,,veriod during which vital records in each Federal
office would be reproduced, and the furnishing of




1343

9127/5o

-4such instructions by Banks to their branches as may be
needed to enable the latter to perform on an emergency basis
essential functions now performed only at the head offices.

In the Presidents' discussion of this report it was
Pointed out that the problem covered by the Subcommittee's
report, i.e. a Security Files Program for the individual
4'serve Banks, is part of a larger problem of setting up an
egrated, nationwide plan of operation for the entire
tnancial community in the event of war disaster. Such a
an would encompass not only the activities of the Federal
serve System but also those of the United States Treasury
:
-Ipartment and)of the commercial banking system. The Presidents agreed
that there is need for such a plan, that it
;71d be
desirable to have one-man coordination of the ef:
shi"„T t° set it up, and that the Federal Reserve System
s -Lc1 l
,ead
the way in promoting such a program. The Preside7
is
further agreed that Mr. Rounds of the New York Bank
,
11 qualified to act as such a coordinator, and Mr.
Roll,,e
ths:t7'
8 Who was present at the Conference meeting, indicated
so. he would accept the responsibility if called upon to do
Federal Reserve
SYst
The Presidents recommend that the entire
wouid
eill
work together toward the objective set forth and they
the welcome discussion of the subject with the members of
Board.

p
V

the

Chairman McCabe stated that the Board would be glad to give
katter
consideration and advise the Presidents of its decision as

14'(111111t4 a8 P°esible,
the ill:4\1411a,
Chairman Peyton inquired whether there was any objection to
Federal Reserve Banks proceeding with the suggested plans
t°1' Protection. ws
the broader progi
rain
their own records which could be integrated into
recommended by the Presidents if such a program

11°111c1 be

It into
effect.

Chairman McCabe responded that there would

4 lic) (3biection to
34ritial. Part of asuch a procedure.




He also suggested that, as an

Program to meet wartime emergencies, consideration

1.344

9/27/50
-5"
°uld

be

given to providinr emergency stocks of currency which

c'11(11/e used in the event of unavailability of the regular stocks
attheFederal Reserve Banks.
3.
with correspondent banks. The Conference disIssed the Federal Reserve System's relationships with the
large
j
correspondent banks and agreed that there is room for
mPrcvement in this respect. The Presidents believe that
nY constructive approach to improve such relations should
Lie given
consideration.
t
In this respect, attention was called particularly
Ca report
made to the April, 1950, meeting of the Assoslation of Reserve City Bankers by its Committee on Correcrdent Bank Relations, concerning "the competitive
lvities of the Federal Reserve Banks as related to correspondent
bank relations.* Mr. Sproul said that this
Port had
been analyzed by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
tir4 and that the analysis had been brought to the attenco°4 cr the present chairman of the Reserve City Bankers'
n
me
:
I tee on Correspondent Bank Relations. As a result a
of Federal Reserve Bank representatives and senior
ice; of
hel
:s
correspondent banks in the New York area was
September 20 to discuss the items noted in the report.

e

ap ,
The Presidents ask that this topic be placed on the
cf the joint meeting of the Presidents and the
since a full discussion of the subject seems parcularly
opportune at this time.
ChaJJ.Alallilimin
:
an Peyton stated that the Presidents had no specific
for improving relations with correspondent banks but
to,

--cuss with the Board any ideas that might be helpful

1-11g a
better relationship.
Mr, Davis, suggestion that Mr. Sproul report on what had
b arlmolleAtby
rti
nis Bank, the latter stated that, inasmuch as the apparent
etneen
the Federal Reserve System and the large correspondent




1345

9127/50
—6—
banks was anding
its principal expression in the Reserve City
Association Committee on Correspondent Bank Relations, his
krIkliad a
nalyzed the report submitted by the Chairman of that Corn—
4littee at
the last
meeting of the Association and found that the
criticisms c
ontained therein had very little substance but were based
41'04 on
distrust of the motives of the System. In this situation,
he said,
it Was
thought that the best way to approach the problem was
to e,,4,

-'er with
Mr. Perkins, the present Chairman of the Committee and

'llee
preSident
t()

d'etermine

of the Chemical Bank and Trust Company of New York,

What, if anything, could be done to improve existing re—
This

conference, Ur. Sproul said, resulted in the sug—
of a
meetino. aith the senior officers of the New York clearing
hollae
s in
charr7e of correspondent bank activities. He added
yankth
kich
a
meeting was held last week at which time it was stated to
the

Zestio n.

si/I'ssentatves of the banks that an analysis of the complaints
been made
kpoe
showed that they had little substance and that the
e of
the m
eetinc, was to explore what was really behind the

that had

41118
that the
with

Sproul went on to say that it appeared at the meeting
Pal difficulty was distrust of the motives of the Sys—

sesPect to
the correspondent banking system, that it was
t,
44et the
Federal Reserve was intent on destroying that system,
41q that
ktri

tr that

question could be cleared up the remainder of the

could be
easily solved.




1-;
9/27/50
—7141'. Sproul made the further statement that in the discussion

at the

he had made it plain that, if there were any thought
that the

System was not going to try to get all of the eligible State

leiberbaril-cs that
it could to join the System, there could be no
ba8ister unde
rstandinrr with the correspondent banks since such mem—
ber411117°11-1-d improve the effectiveness of the System and the banking
eriera4Y, but that if there were questions about the methods
Ilael by the
Federal Reserve System in seeking increased membership
those
9.11estions could be
discussed. The second point ahich he es—
Phasi.zed, lAr.
Sproul said, was that there had been suSpicion of the
Pederaa.
Reserve SYstem even before it was established xhich had per—
aiated ,
c3ugh the
years, that certain central banking functions ex—
Nieed
" "“e co
rrespondent banks before the organization of the
8Yst
been given to
the System, that it had the responsibility of
14 these functions under the law

411Y Walr

and that it could not in

.kt thee 0111promise that situation. He said he told the group that
e two
Points
were understood he thought the suspicion that had
Over

the years could be dispelled, and that whatever other

*NlieeS

were could be easily eliminated. As a result of
that„
eting, he
ot 00 .
said, he had been authorized to appoint a committee
4.ta.cer, 0„.
ot the
the
Federal Reserve Bank to work with representatives
e%
elearirighOUSe banks to discuss specific points of complaint to
4lat co
be done to
dispose of them.




1 347

9/27/50
-8Chairman McCabe expressed the opinion that the action taken
4. Sproul

was a step in the right direction and that similar

iii"tings might
well be held in other districts in which there were
rs of the
Reserve City Bankers Association Committee on CorreIP°Ildent Bank Rela
tions
Mr. Sproul commented that Ir. Perkins had •
eXi)ressed the
hope that the Federal Reserve Banks in all districts

•

meetings with heads of correspondent banks for a frank
il`11•1g of
the whole
matter to see if in that manner improved relation84138C0111d be
achieyed.
Chairman McCabe stated that it might be desirable to take the
P with
the officers of the Reserve City Bankers Association
145 see if
something could be accomplished at that level also. This
allggestioh was
discussed and it was felt that it might be helpful in
te

renl'Itil'ig some
of the existing distrust and suspicion.
Mr.

Vardaman referred to the meetings which he and other
rePre3entative3 of
the Board had with the Committee on Correspondent
4lations in
January
1948, at which time he stated that the System
l'f4 head
"
't°ward • ediate credit on cash items, that the Federal
44r/te
SYstem had
an
under the law to provide efficient
obligati°n
4citeolletion
and that if the correspondent banks did
43t like
that s
ituation they should present the matter to the Congress.

ktte

Mr.

Ibles

Sproul

question:d whether there were any irreconcilable

between the
Sys -em




the correspondent banks particu-

134S

9/27/50
-9—
14'4 if

there could be an understanding on the two points to which

he had
referred.

He felt that the approach to the problem should
be based on
how the banking functions of the country could be pert°11ned to give
the best possible service and that if there were a
Paaaticular job
which the System was not required by law to perform
alki the
function could be performed better by the correspondent banks
than
0Y the
Reserve Banks the correspondent banks should handle it,
bilt that if
the Federal Reserve Banks could do a job more effectively

the4 they
should do it.
In response to Mr. Vardamants comment, Mr. Spi'oul stated that
not
think that there was any understanding or commitment on
the
Part
of the
System to move to immediate credit on cash items,
thq th
e SYstem
had decided to adopt a maximum deferment of two days,
that
no c°mmitment had been made beyond that point.
Mr.
eral
'‘''cl-es commented on the legislative history of the FedRese_
've Act as
.orire
indicating the intent of Congress that the Federal
he diri

toa

anks should
assume the functions of the correspondent banks

.,e1
cer
'
v. ,t gNter
degree than had been done.

He recognized that there

he ko t&11-1 services that the correspondent banks, particularly in
rley.
?th,,erve
tleu,

-4 the

niarket, could perform more satisfactorily than the Federal
aliks, that

this would be the case even if all banks were

th
Federal Reserve System, and that this was demonstrated
r4ct that
banks which are now members maintain substantial




1 349
9127/93
-10l'elationships with correspondent banks. He felt that if membership
&lithe
Federal Reserve System was to be increased, the System aould
haNe to
meet the competition of correspondent banks and that it was
at
hat
point that misunderstanding arose. In these circumstances,
111111e he Was
not Opposed to facinr, the issue and trying to resolve
the
clifficulties and misunderstandings that had developed, he was not
4°Per11-1 of the
results.
There was a
general discussion of the problem from the stand13°1111' Of the

importance of membership in the Federal Reserve System

arl

effective banking system and the relationship of the problem to
the elleck
collection system. During this discussion, Mr. 4illiams
t4tecl that
comment had been made by one Reserve City banker that the
‘14411e Problem
would be settled if the Federal Reserve Banks would make
It elear that
they were not interested in holding the excess reserves
)4Triber banks.
The Presidents indicated that their Banks had never
4(31:"ted deposit

of member banks in excess of requirements and

4 era/. atated
that the only activity of the Federal Reserve Banks
thia
Con,

441„ auch —"ion had been to suggest that their member banks witheXcess reserve
deposits.
Mr. n
ot the
-avis questioned ahether there was anything in the law
the?

egislative history of the Federal Reserve Act that required

edersi.

re

eserve System to grant immediate credit on cash items.
a gen
eral discussion of the original intent of the Federal




9/27/50
-114serve Act on
this point during which Mr. Powell referred to the
leeting with the
Federal Advisory Council next week at which there
'4°114113e a discussion of
the System's decision to reduce to two days
the lila-M.11113m
deferment on cash items. He questioned the desirability
°f iliclicating in that discussion that the decision was part of a
which would eventually result in immediate credit for cash
it(t8
' There
the

was general agreement that there was no commitment at

Present time
to go beyond the two-day maximum deferment.

been

III% Vardaman
inquired why the two-day maximum deferment had

adopted if it
was not the intention of the System eventunlly
t° g° t°
inZediate
al response to this question
principal
144 that
the
actioncredit.n
had been taken
deferment schedules of the
114e,
-rye Ba.nks
into greater uniformity. It was pointed out that in the
P°rhood
4rite 8
72 per cent of the checks handled by the Federal Rekkil4 Y8tern were beingcollected in two days and the adoption of a

cbte: der"lient of two days aould add comparatively little to the
17°111/11e of

float.

4.y thati4r° Vardaman asked if it would be an accurate statement to
the SYsteln would shorten availability schedules as rapidly
4e°11elat
en -with
improvements in check collection systems. There
ciission of
this question but no answer aas agreed upon.
kl
pring th° discussion Chairman lvicCabe aithdrew from the meeting.
a ent of
the cost of Blue Cross benefits for families
aeryiees.
Federal Reserve Banks enterinf: military
pe,
111°11 stated that, ivhile this subject was not on the




3S1
9/27/50
-12agelicla) it had
been suggested that it would be desirable to discuss
1144 the
Board while the Presidents were in dashington the advisahial:t'Y°r an arrangement under which at least part of the cost of
continuing the
Blue Cross benefits for the family of an employee
c)t a Federal Reserve Bank while
he was in the military service would
be154/4 bY the
Bank. It was the consensus of the Presidents, Mr.
?eYt" said, that it
would be desirable to amend the existing authorization to
include this additional benefit and it was the opinion
c)t t m
he aj°ritY that the Federal Reserve Banks should be authorized
14)114Y
tR)...tillirds of the cost.
the za 11re Eccles stated that the Board would be glad to consider
'
11°14
ti48

theand
tter
it was understood that for that purpose an excerpt
--nutes of the
Presidents 1 Conference held in Boston on
Ilbjeet would be
supplied to the Board as promptly as possible.




Thereupon the meeting a

ourned.

Secretary.