View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for September 21, 1959.

To:

Members of the Board

From:

Office of the Secretary

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard
to the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will
advise the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, if you
were present at the meeting, please initial in
column A below to indicate that you approve the
minutes. If you were not present, please initial
in column B below to indicate that you have seen
the minutes.

Chm. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. King




• ir

;.;

Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
On Monday, September 21, 1959.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

The Board met in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
Mills
Robertson
Shepardson
King
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Sherman, Secretary
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Thomas, Economic Adviser to the Board
Molony, Assistant to the Board
Fauver, Assistant to the Board
Young, Director, Division of Research and
Statistics
Hackley, General Counsel
Solomon, Director, Division of Examinations
Sammons, Associate Adviser, Division of
International Finance
Landry, Assistant to the Secretary

Messrs. Gemmill, Goldstein, Irvine, Katz,
Maroni, Reynolds, and Wood of the Division
of International Finance.
Economic review.

The staff of the Division of International

Flnance presented a review of international economic conditions and
developments, after which the members of that Division withdrew from

the meeting.
Memorandum from Miss Hart dated September 18, 1959, commenting
°Iitl

esentation by the New York Clearing House Association on

It ft

At Chairman Martin's suggestion, it was agreed that
C0lsideration of this memorandum be held over to a later meeting.




9/21/59

-2Messrs. Thomas and Young withdrew from the meeting and Messrs.

Chase and O'Connell, Assistant General Counsel, entered during the
following discussion.
S. 1070, a bill to amend and recodify the Administrative
Procedure Act.

In a memorandum dated September 15, 1959, the Legal

Division presented summary comments on S. 1070, a bill to amend and
racodify the Administrative Procedure Act, a draft of section by
section comments on the bill, and a draft letter to Senator Eastland,
Chairman, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, in reply to his letter
Of August 13, 1959, requesting the Board's views on this legislation.
Mr. Hackley noted that an important feature of the bill was
4

requirement that prior notice be given for all rule making of an

egencY whereas the present law permits the waiving of such notice
'there the agency finds that such public announcement "would be
contrary to public interest."

Under the proposed bill, any rule

issued under this section without such prior notice and hearings

14741,1d be a "temporary or emergency rule" and could not remain in effect
410re than six months unless extended after notice in public hearings.
MI** Hackley felt that such a requirement would be impractical in matters
ellch as changes in margin requirements.

He also pointed out that

4hOther problem area in the language of the bill related to judicial
411Pea18 from administrative decisions.

At present an appellate court

/411 accept an agency's decision if the latter is supported by




9/21/59

-3-

substantial evidence."

S. 1070, on the other hand, apparently would

allow a court to reverse the agency if the court found that the agency's
decision was "based upon findings of fact that were clearly erroneous."
In making his statement, Mr. Hackley stressed that he was
merely presenting a preliminary report on this bill and that the Board
vould have further opportunity to consider it later on. In reply to
a question from Governor Robertson regarding the subpoena power, Mr.
Hackley observed the language of the bill was not clear on this point.
Under the present law, an agency must have received specific authorization to exercise the subpoena power.

In this connection Mr. Chase

suggested that the Board might wish to raise a question concerning
this point in its section by section comment on the bill, and Mr.
O'Connell noted that the language of the bill specified that presiding
Qfficers should have the subpoena power during agency hearings whereas
current law vests subpoena power in the agency itself.
After additional discussion, it was agreed that the letter to
8anator Eastland should be revised and brought back to the Board for
tarther consideration.
Messrs. Chase and O'Connell then withdrew and Messrs. Johnson,
til'ect°r,and Sprecher, Assistant Director, Division of Personnel

Adillinistration, entered the room.
Letter to Dr. Carey (Item No. 1). Pursuant to a request dated

14aY 18, 1959, by Dr. Carey, Chairman of the President's Committee on




9/21/59

-4-

Government Employment Policy, a report had been prepared by Mr. Sherman
in his capacity as Employment Policy Officer for the Board of Governors
concerning operations of the Board under Executive Order 10590.

The

report, copies of which had been distributed before this meeting,
covered the period January 18, 1955 to June 30, 1959.
There followed a detailed discussion of parts of the report
and a general discussion of the extent to which members of minority
groups were employed in
various capacities in the Board's organization.
During the discussion Mr. Sherman noted that the President's
Committee on Government Employment Policy would have a meeting on
Wednesday,
September 23, 1959, and that he, Mr. Fauver, and Mr. Sprecher
Planned to attend.
At the conclusion of the discussion, there was unanimous
13:Ell.aa5

that the report should be transmitted to Dr. Carey by letter

Pl'epared for Chairman Martin's signature in the form attached to
the

Se Minutes

as Item, No. 1.

The meeting then adjourned.




Secretary's Note: Governor Shepardson today
approved on behalf of the Board a letter to
the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (attached
Item No. 2) regarding a survey of filing
procedures at that Bank by personnel from the
Board's records staff.

C

4A

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item lioo

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

9/211:59

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

September 21, 1959.

Dr. Archibald J. Carey, Jr.,
Chairman, The Presidentss Committee
on Government Employment Policy,
308 Main Civil Service Commission Building,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Dr. Carey:
As requested in your letter of May 18, 1959,
Mr. Merritt Sherman, Employment Policy Officer for the
Board of Governors, has prepared the attached progress
report concerning operations under Executive Order 10590.
This report covers the period from January le,
1955 to June 30, 19590 and is responsive to the question,naire included with your letter.
Sincerely yours,
(Signed) Win. MCC. Martin, Jr.
Whi, MCC. Martin, Jr.

Attachment




r

Progress Report of the Employment Policy Officer
of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(January 18, 1955 to June 30, 1959)
1,

(a) Have you taken steps to assure yourself that all persons
engaged in recruiting give fair and equal consideration
to all applicants and, as far as practicable, to all
sources of recruiting? (Check-list, Item 4.)
Yes. Conferences have been held from time to time with members of

the p

ersonnel Division engaged in recruiting to make certain that fair and
eltial C onsideration is given to all applicants for positions at the Board.
Like

wise, a

review has been made of recruiting processes to determine

tha.t
there has been no systematic exclusion of sources for applicants who

4light be members of minority groups.
In r
ecruiting new personnel, the small size of the Board's organiza404 i
s an important factor. Its needs for new employees are limited
eR
-Serai1
a-ly to the turnover of its existing staff. Usual sources of recruitar

e Used to fill vacancies such as drop-in applicants, and applicants

'who
r
flake inquiry

by telephone or mail, as well as referral of applicants

rrlay be acquaintances of present employees. Continual contact is
qvcai
ned
°11e
ge8

with placement offices of high schools, business schools, and

or referral of applicants for specific positions and, on occasion,

11

'en necessary to resort to newspaper advertising or to send
1
8 to

nearby schools to seek applicants particularly in the clerical,




-2-

tYPing, or stenographic fields. The process in connection with contact,

`ng Placement offices in the various schools has been studied to determine
that there has been no systematic exclusion of potential sources.

(b) Have you examined, on an adequate sample basis, certificates of eligibles to see that members of minority
groups are not being systematically excluded from certain
types of positions? (Check -list, Item 5.)
Positions at the Board of Governors are not covered by the Classification Act and, therefore, "certificates of eligibles" are not used by
this agency. However, on two occasions since January 1955, a 100
Per cent review has been made of all applications received by the
Personnel Division within a given month to determine their considera4 and disposition.
"
The first of these reviews covered all applications received by,
or
Iltacts made with, the Personnel Division during the month of
'
81.

1956. The report submitted on the basis of this review stated:
So far as could be determined, there was no evidence

that the procedures used by the Personnel Division would
r esult in any violation of the basic employment policy
spelled out in the regulations and procedures of the Board
;sued on July 25, 1955, to carry out the purposes of
)(ecutive Order 10590 relating to employment policy. It
ea
_ p n be stated with definiteness that so far as the procedures
the Personnel Division are concerned, all applications
are
forwarded to the operating division having existing or
_
tential vacancies in positions for which the applicant
e °uld be qualified. It should be noted that in general the
A11-11)10yrne nt standards of the Board are exceptionally high.
testing program is used for determining the qualifications




-3-

of applicants for positions that are appropriate for testing
procedures, such as clerical, typing, and stenographic
Positions. Applicants failing to meet minimum standards
are, of course, rejected without referral to operating
divisions.
A second review covered all applications received, or contacts
made with, the
Personnel Division during June 1957. The findings
0f the second review were
similar to the first. There is no reason
t° assume that the experience in these months of the year would be
4111r

different than in other periods. Continuous liaison with the

/)el'sonnel Division indicates that procedures have not been changed
since the date
of the last review.
1` (c) Have you observed the personne
l of the components of
your department or agency to determine whether
members of minority groups are restricted to certain
low-level positions? (Check-list, Item 7.)
Yes. Members of minority groups are
not restricted to certain
level positions and may be found at virtually all levels within the

toa.
I'd's organization.
1,
(d)

Are there any units within your organization where
employees are segregated on the basis of race, color,
religion, or national origin? (Check -list, Item 8.)

1\I°• While certain units in the Board's organization are comprised
411.gel
Y of members of a minority group, this has not come about as a
lt of

any planned segregation of employees on the basis of race,

'4.• religion,
or national origin. It has resultetl from the tendency
for
4411110rity groups to be more available for certain kinds of
work.




-41. (e)

Does your department or agency have Negroes in supervisory positions? If so, do they supervise white
employees? (Check -list, Item 9.)

As indicated in the Board's letter to the President's Committee,
dated April 26, 1956, there
are a number of Negroes in supervisory
Positions within the Board's organization. In some areas Negroes
instruct white employees in the use of machines or techniques in

the cours e of
their work. Negroes have not been excluded from
suPervisory positions over white employe
es. Although at the present
tirrie
none is in such a position, such arrangements have existed and
Proved satisfac
tory in the past.
1.
Have you checked to determine whether there is a belief
on the part of supervisors that white employees would
refuse to work cooperatively with Negroes, particularly
if the latter were placed in supervisory positions?
(Check -list, Item 10.)
Negroes and white employees work together harmoniously in

sever al

different units and divisions within the Board's organization.

l'her•
e 1s no reason to believe
that white employees would refuse to
\ltiOrk

c°operatively with
Negroes in supervisory positions over them.
Q14

the c

krra

ontrary, as indicated in the answer to 1(e) above, such

ligernents have existed and proved satisfactory in the
past.
what extent have
the non -discrimination policy and program
been
st
included in your inservice programs, and on the agenda of
aff• executive, and supervi
sory conferences?
The

bearin

nature and size of
the Board's organization has an important

g Oil the methods
used to bring before the members of its staff



-5-

the rules, regulations, and principles regarding the nondiscrimination
P°1icY. Action to inform the staff regarding the policy preceded
txecutive
Order 10590, of course, going back at least as far as
ecutive Order 9980 of 1948, setting forth basic Fair Employment
Practices.
So far as Executive Order 10590 is concerned, the provisions of
the Board's regulations relating to this Order have been called to the
a.
ttention of every officer, supervisor, and employee at least once a
Year since their adoption. In July 1955, every person on the staff
was Provided with a personal copy of the Rules and Regulations. In
1956,
Copies were again circulated and initialed by everyone within

they .
arious divisions of the Board's organization. In 1957, a copy of
—Lorandum No. 9, Prepared by the President's Committee and dated
3s Was distributed to each member of the staff. When the
3:lc:lard!S

regulations were altered in February 1958, to take account
tx
ecutive Order 10722, a copy of the revised regulations was made

4vailable to
each officer, supervisor, and employee. Finally, an
erriployees handbook,
recently completed for the convenience and use
thp.
S taff,
also includes a statement of the nondiscrimination policy.
Mor

eover, as each new employee joins the Board's staff, he is

tildoetrinated regarding this
policy. During the induction process,
new employee is given a copy of the Board's rules and regulations,




-6-

together with a letter from the Employment Policy Officer. This
letter begins: "It is the policy of the Board of Governors that all
Personnel actions shall be based solely on merit and not on considerations
of race, color, religion, or national origin." It invites
the new employee to bring to the Employment Policy Officer or his
dePlitY any questions he might have concerning the policy.
As a result of this comprehensive orientation program it is
believed that the Board's employees have a good understanding of
hat is
l'ight

of

expected in regard to this policy, as well as of what their
redress is, if they should feel on the basis of their personal

e3q)erience that the policy has not been followed.
The nondiscrimination policy has been discussed on various
oce —
'"`I.ons at meetings of the Board and the senior staff as well as
divis•ionai staff
conferences. Discussion of the policy will also
be
eluded in a supervisory development training activity now being
instituted.
3.
If your
department or agency has recruited employees from
ources other than civil service registers, what measures
have You
of
adopted to insure that no discrimination because
, race, color, religion, or national origin was resorted to
ln the
recruiting, examining, and appointing process?
As indicated in the answers to 1(a) and 1(3) above, positions
°11 the
)3°a-rd's staff are not covered by the Classification Act, and
theref
°re all recruiting
is from other than civil service registers.




-7Please see the answers to these questions for measures adopted to
insure that no discrimination because of race, color, religion, or
national origin is resorted to in the recruiting, examining, and
PPointing process.
4.

Aside from the survey made at the request of the Committee
lfl five
cities in 1956, have any surveys been made by you,
either specific or general, to determine the extent to which
minority groups have obtained employment or advancement?
If. Your
answer is "yes" furnish information concerning such
Placements.
No surveys similar to the comp7hensive visual check
made in

1956 at
the Committee's request have been made. However, the small
size spf the Board's organization
makes it practicable for the Employment
Aoli,
"n*V. Officer personally to observe procedures throughout the
organization

• On the basis of
general surveys that he has made, it is apparent
that e
r1.11310yrnent opportunities and advancements have been given to
,
vlittuals
without regard to the fact that they may be members of
41inor it,
7 groups,
5•
4.1
You know of

instances in which members of minority groups,
Pearticularly Negroes, have been placed in positions or job
,ategories previously not open to such group members since
;43cecutive Order 10590 was issued on January 18, 1955? If
o ur answer is "yes" furnish information concerning such
—t-ac ernent.

I\10•
The Board's
policy of nondiscrimination predates Executive
Orde
/. 10590.
6,
boe
s Your
department or agency have a formal program for the
arldPfecti°n of management and personnel functions of bureaus
beir:leld es tablishments?
If so, to what extent is this service
to secure information concerning the effectiveness
thg used
orA e nond
iscrimination program provided for by Executive
‘-ter 10590?



As indicated in previous correspondence with the Committee, the
13°ard of Governors does not have a field organization in the usual sense
°f this term as
applied to other government agencies. The Federal
Iteserve Banks
are quasi-governmental organizations, and their employees
'
a re not government employees. Therefore, while the Board does have
4 for

program for inspection of management and personnel functions

°f the Reserve Banks, such a program is not used in the manner suggested by the
question.
With regard to the Board's own organization, responsibility for
level
°Ping information concerning the effectiveness of the nondiscrimination
program provided for by Executive Order 10590 has been placed
On

the Employment Policy Officer and his deputy. Periodic inspections

h`tve b een
made to determine that the policy of nondiscrimination is being
1°14)wed in the
recruitment, placement, promotion, and retention of
ett1131°Yees.
7.
111 your department or agency has the non-discrimination
P,1311cy been strengthened and advanced by Executive Order 10590.
-csxPlain your answer.
The nondiscriminatory policies provided for in Executive
10590 are
substantially the same as those set forth in its preExecutive Order 9980, which outlined the basic policy of
15t°11ibiting

discrimination against any employee or applicant for employ-

Use of race, color, religion, or national origin. From. that
View,therefore, it could be contended that Executive Order 10590
not sf
-r engthen or advance the Board's nondiscriminatory policy,
11111ch

a8

the Board had been adhering to the Fair Employment Policy




I

-9

On the other hand, certain administrative changes brought about
xecutive Order 10590 were significant. As an example, the
SePa-ratio n of the responsibility for carrying out the policy from
the 04, ,
handling personnel matters established an independent
elle L.
e‘/.14 on compliance and provided an additional safeguard for
°hjectivity• Similarly, the more active leadership provided by
the ; ,
'
nuependent President's Committee since June 1955, has in
till...4 Provided a basis for more
frequent presentation of these
Illatters

to Board employees. From the broad point of view, there-

fore,
it Would appear that while Executive Order 10590 did not
Re the basic
policy of the Board of Governors regarding nondisc ,i
illination, that policy has been strengthened and advanced
becau
se of administrative changes which accompanied it.

beePort on any additional activities which you believe would
er,of interest or assistance to those
concerned with the
"e ctivenes s of the non-discrimination
policy.
Alth
°ugh this agency has no activities of its own to report,
041d

ik

e to point out that experiences of other agencies, as

oted
the Cormnittee's Employment Policy News, have been of

sider

le interest. For example, good
use was made of the

llent pa
P1114i

She

rriphlet on "The Federal Nondiscrimination Policy"

d bY the
Veterans Administration and reported in the News.




3cv •
-10It would
hardly have been practical, of course, to print such a
booklet for the small number of execut
ives in the Board's organizati"S By circulating a copy of the VA pamphlet, however,
to each
division director, it was possible to accomplish
the same purpose.




***

Respectfully submitted,

lagrisa Ibraitt Oat=
1959.

Merritt Sherman
Employment Policy Officer

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 2
9/21/59

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

September 21, 1959
ItIr• W. H. Irons, President,
Reserve Bank of Dallas,
411as 2) Texas.
'
Dear Mr. Irons:
It is understood that in recent conversations you expressed a
trtlje to have the advice of personnel from the Hoard's records staff
.
regar
u to the installation of improved filing procedures at the
°Ieral Reserve Bank of Dallas.
comply The Board has considered your request and will be pleased to
Reo0 • As an initial step, Miss Edna B. Poeppel, Chief of the Board's
,fas Section, would be prepared to visit the Dallas Bank for a week
der to appraise your requirements and make preliminary findings.
r'°ePpel could arrange to be at the Bank on Wednesday, October 214,
from "ain through Tuesday, October 20, if that would be convenient
Your standpoint.
made
Following Miss Poeppel's general survey, arrangements could be
'
1 a qualified person or persons to go to Dallas and remain for
such .f.°
the _Cline as necessary to establish a revised filing system and begin
eirdatining of Bank staff assigned to that function. On the basis of
Atiall;' work done several years ago at the Federal Reserve Bank of
43 it is
to
estimated that approximately two months might be required
aeccm1Plish these purposes.
Projem. Miss Poeppel and any other person or persons assigned to this
baais-w,Would be retained on the Board's pay roll on a nonreimbursable
01 i but it would be expected that travel and incidental expenses
be reimbursed to the Board by the Reserve Bank upon submission
PPropriate vouchers.
°Lltli„If You would like to proceed under an arrangement such as that
ntlita;lus Please let us know whether the date of October 114 would be
6 for Miss Poeppel's initial visit.




Very truly yours,
(7
L

Merritt Sher an,
Secretary.