View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1.802

A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System was held in Washington on Monday, September 14, 1942, at 2:00 p.m.
PRESENT:

Mr. Ransom, Vice Chairman
Mr. McKee
Er. Draper
Mr. Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Clayton, Assistant to the Chairman

The action stated with respect to each of the matters hereinafter referred
to was taken by the Board:
Letter to Mr. Meyer, Assistant Cashier of the Federal Reserve
Bank of
Chicago, reading as follows:
'The Board of Governors approves the following changes
,a,21.the personnel classification plan at the Head Office and
vetroit Branch as submitted with your letter of September 1,
1942:
Pages 11-A and 11-B of the Head Office plan,
reflecting increases in the maximum annual salaries of the Assistant Supervisors in the Mail
Department (Day and Night Forces) from t1,500 to
$2,000.
Pages 207 to 211 inclusive of the Head Office plan, and page 63 of the Detroit Branch
Plan, reflecting the change in the name of the
Installment Credit Department to Consumer Credit
Department.
"In view of the special circumstances governing the app,ointment
and the relationship of the Executive Manager of the
victory Fund Committee, it is felt that the position does not
Properly come within the scope of the personnel classification
II:t,110 Accordingly proposed page 215 as submitted with your
,_et_ter is not approved. For your information, none of the
l'irsonnel classification plans of the other Reserve Banks
Provides for such a position."




Approved unanimously.

803
9/14/42

-2Letter to the board of directors of the "Arkansas Trust Com-

PanY", Hot Springs,
Arkansas, stating that, subject to conditions of
membership numbered 1 to 6 contained in the Board's Regulation
H0 the
8°ard approves the bankts application for membership in the Federal Reserve SYatem
and for the appropriate amount of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis.
The letter also contained the following special comments:
. "The Board is prescribing the conditions of membership
°Fdlmarily prescribed for banks exercising fiduciary powers
When they are admitted
to membership and it will not object,
und?r condition of membership numbered 1,
to your bank reV1119-ng the exercise of such powers, as is now contemplated.
is understood, of course, that
when such business is ungertaken,
your bank will have qualified personnel and be
o
therwise equipped to handle it in a proper manner.
"It appears that your bank may have certain powers
rolch are not being exercised and which are not incidenta
l
to the
conduct of a banking and trust business, and atten1°n is called to the fact that it will be necessary under
condition of membership numbered 1, to obtain the Board's
ermlssion
before exercising such powers. In this connecion, it is understood that there has been no change in the
!cope of the corporate
powers exercised by the bank since
lt applied for membership."

t

Approved unanimously, together with a
letter to Mr. Davis, President of the Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis, reading as follows:
"The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System apyes the application of the 'Arkansas Trust Company', Hot
tPrings, Arkansas, for membership in the Federal Reserve Sys"
tem, subject to
l
t
the conditionse
enclosed
prescribed in the
Which you are requested to forward to the Board of Direc2'
18 of the institution. Two copies of such letter are also
n?losed, one of which is for your files and the other of
:
111-ch you are requested to forward to
for
the Bank Commissioner
the State of Arkansas for his information.

r




1804
9/14/42

-3-

"It is assumed that you will follow the matter of the
bank's bringing into conformity with the provisions of law
d the Board's
regulations the savings accounts referred
°n Page 16 of the report of examination for membership."

r

Letter to Mr. Evans, Vice President and Secretary of the Federal
Reserve Bank
of Dallas, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of September 5, 1942, en,&sing copies of correspondence between your bank and The
First National Bank
of Galveston, Galveston, Texas, with respect to the
question whether the latter bank may lawfully
aceePt, under the provisions of the Board's Regulation Q,
a savings deposit from an army post exchange.
"It is understood that the army post exchange here involved is of the same type and character as the post exchanges
operated in many army
camps and posts through the United States;
that --s
i+ primary
purpose is to provide soldiers with a convenient and
readily accessible mercantile establishment where they
may purchase various items of merchandise at reasonable prices;
'ad that, while it
makes a small profit on its sales, the making
of such profit is incidental to its principal purpose of
being a
service organization for the benefit of service men.
the basis of these facts, it is the view of the Board
that :he army
)ost exchange in question may not be regarded as
i
an 'organization operated primarily for religious, philanthrope, charitable, educational, fraternal or other similar purP)ses and not
operated for profit'; and that, accordingly,
tlInds deposited
by it in a member bank do not constitute savngs deposits within the meaning of the definition of that
"I'm contained in Regulation Q.
"Several years ago, in reply to a somewhat similar in41111-17, the Board stated that where funds are held by a lcus:°diant for the benefit of the members of a certain service
;
rganization and are,
in fact, used only for educational and
_..?ereational purposes, no objection ,would be offered to the
'
1--”sification of such funds as savings deposits if they
ot herwise
Set forth complied with the requirements of the definition
in Regulation
If in the present case further
--1Yormation should come to
you which indicates that the funds
,f the
post exchange here involved are, in fact, used solely
0°
4 educational or recreational purposes, the Board would
s'
- er no objection to the classification of such funds as
avings deposits.

7




1805
9/14/42

-4-

"In this connection, it is suggested that consideration
Tight be given to the transfer of the funds in question to
interest-bearing time deposit accounts."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Presidents of all the Federal Reserve Banks, reading as

follows:

4..
"For your information and that of your Counsel in connec'
1°n with Regulation V and other loan transactions, there are
enclosed two copies of the opinion of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the case of
4,1 2S1 .lag..E2 V. Lehinan which was decided August 19, 1942.
"This case was first heard by the Circuit Court of Appeals in May 1942 and a decision was rendered on May 21,
1942, reported in 128 Fed. (2d) 564, to the effect that,
Under New York law, an assignment of monies to become due
under a contract under certain circumstances is invalid as
1 einst a trustee in bankruptcy. On a petition for a re7
hearing briefs were filed on behalf of several New York
uanks and by Reconstruction Finance Corporation in support
Of the
petition. In the opinion herewith enclosed, the
Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed its previous decision and in effect, therefore, has upheld the validity of
Such an assignment as against a trustee in bankruptcy."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. B. B. Griffith, Assistant to Director of Finance

t the

united States Maritime Commission, reading as follows:

"It will be recalled that at the conference on August
1942, with reference to loans under Executive Order 9112,
view was expressed that the position heretofore taken
h respect to the charging of more than 5 per cent interest
n guEranteed loans after maturity should be reversed, and
alSO that the advice given in your letter of July 3, 1942,
with respect to a special condition where interest after
turity is greater than the normal loan rate might be canel
It was requested that letters be prepared to carry
°Ilt this view.
"It has heretofore been the position of the Board and
Gr the Services that in no event should any interest rate
D.B.Yable by the borrower in connection with a guaranteed
""
)
an, whether interest after maturity, interest on overdue

n

r




1806
9114/42
"interest, or otherwise, exceed the maximum rate prescribed
for guaranteed
loans, namely, 5 per cent per annum. Since
the conference
on August 12, this matter has been the subject of further
discussion and consideration, and the Board
feels that the position heretofore taken
on this question
is correct
and should not be modified at this time. If the
Present position on this Question is maintained, it is as!umed that you do
not desire to make any change at this time
in the advice given
in your letter of July 3, 1942, with respect to a special condition where interest
after maturity
is greater than the normal loan
rate.
"In the circumstances, we have not undertaken to prePare any letters
along the lines suggested at the meeting
on August
12. We trust that this disposition of the matter will meet
with your approval, but if not, we will, of
course, be glad to consider the matter with you further."
Approved unanimously, together with
similar letters to Mr. Sidney A. Mitchell,
Chief of Finance Section of the Office of
Procurement and Material, Navy Department,
and Colonel John C. Mechem, Chief of the
Miscellaneous Branch, Fiscal Division,
War Department.
Letter to Mr. Dillard, Vice President and Secretary of the Federa Reserve
Bank of Chicago, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of August 18, 1942, enclosv,
a copy of a memorand
um dated July 31, 1942, from the House"old Finance Corporation to all of its Western branch offices,
'elating to the preservation of Statements of Borrower obtained
pursuant to Regulation W. You point but that, because
O
the present inability to obtain additional filing equipment,
because the Corporation does not carry more than one loan
contract
with a borrower at the same time, there being frePent consolid
ations of old loans with new cash advances, the
has
advised its Western brahch offices that they
feed
retain only the last two Statements of Borrower.
"As you know, the question of preserving old records is
5ler study but
has not been settled. It involves a number of
,':umPI
:
exities, among which is the necessity of designating the
,rticular records which are to be kept on file. In the mean,
1111e, it would not seem desirable to make a special rule with
respect to
the Statement of Borrower.

t




1_807
9/14/42

-6-

Me feel that the procedure proposed by Household Finance Corporation would not be suitab
le for adoption when a
time-limit rule
for the preservation of records is preScribed, inasmuch as it would often result
in the destruction of records that would
be essential to an investigation
of transactions
occurring quite recently. In addition, both
the Statem
ent of Borrower and the Statement of Necessity instruct Registrants to keep the statements
'on file'. There.ore, the Regulation in effect requires these statem
ents to
be
retained until such time as a rule with respect to time
liuuts is prescr
ibed.
%Idle we are not unmindful of difficulties that may be
experienced in
securing adequate filing or storage space,
lich records
as are required for an adequate enforcement of
the D
suegUlatiOn must be °reserved. We assume that part of
the loan
records are preserved for the period of limitation
of actions
under State law which, in some cases, exceeds
l'hree years, the
applicable Federal limitation for prosecution of offenses. The addition of the Statement of Borrower to
these records would not seem to create an undue
burden for the Regist
rants."

5

Approved unanimously.
Or

Letter to Mr. Hale, Vice President of the Federal Reserv Bank
e
S5n

Francisco,

reading as follows:

"This refers to your letter of August 29, 1942, relating to the
application of Regulation Vito the use of 'merchandise orders' which are sold on credit by stores and
lich may be
presented to such stores in payment for merchandise
subsequently purchased, either by the persons to
Whom,
such orders were sold or, as is frequently the case,
j
i other
persons. It seems that you are interested priin those cases where such orders are sold in charge
accounts.
"In view of both sections 11(a) and 11(e), the Board
agrees with your view that the use of 'merchandise orders',
1.1111
4,
may be used in the purchase of listed articles, would
violate the restrictions of the Regulation applicable to
',:f_lrge accounts
so long as any such order is not charged in
'
Qin account that
is in default and default is deemed to oc14
'Upon failure to pay
for any such order within the period
2ecified in section 5(c).
Of course, in some cases, this
l
l ipt be more strict than
is actually required by the Regu"n; but, under such procedure, as you point out, there

V




1808
9/14/42

-7-

"would be no need for restricting or policing the use of such
orders, and they could be accepted by the store as the equivalent of cash.
"As you know, a merchandise order which has not been paid
for, could not be used as the required down payment in an insale in view of section 11(e)."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Allan C. Stevens, President of the Great Eastern
Fire I
nsurance Company, White Plains, New York, reading as follows:
"Thank you for your letter of September 4 replying and
c
ommenting on our letter of August 19 regarding the application of the Board's Regulation W to the financing of fire
and casualty insurance Premiums.
"We gather from your letter, and from the letter of
Mr. Edward I. Taylor which you enclosed, that the insurnnce
Pmpanies have used and will continue to use their influence
toward the use of notes payable to the lending institutions,
rather than 'payee notes', in the financing of such premiums. Such notes payable to lending institutions are, as
set forth in
our letter to you dated July 23, subject to the
restrictions of section 6 of Regulation?! unless they fall
Within the class exempted by section 8(g). Consequently,
i,nell-ITuence by the insurance companies will result in a
for notes given in payment of premiums, where made
r $1500 or less, to meet the conditions specified in see0n 8(g) of Regulation W.
. "It would apoear that the making of notes under the proof section 8(g) will permit the financing of premiums
i-La basis that will be quite satisfactory to most policy
holders, who may desire to save money by taking policies for
more than
one year and yet pay their premium costs in conenient instalments, but will cause the tatal amount of
credit that will be outstanding to be somewhat less than
would be the case if the notes did not conform to the reof section 8(g). This effect on the amount of
is, of course, a desirable one from the point of view
_f the Board, and
the Board therefore does not see any reason
for
amending the regulation in this respect.
"The foregoing discussion may seem to suggest that Regulation?! ought to be amended so that 'payee notes' given

J

r




1809
9/14/42

-8-

it •
in Payment of insurance premiums will also be subject to
the restric
tions of the regulation. At the present time,
however, the amount of credit that would be eliminated by
such an amendment does not
seem to be sufficient to justify
the necessary
amendment of the regulation, particularly in
view of the Board's desire to avoid complicating the regulation by adding further provisions that are not absolutely
necessary.n
Approved unanimously.
Letter prepared for the signature of Ur. Ransom to Mr. Lawrence
14* c, Smith, Chief of the Special War Policies Unit, Departm
ent of Justice,
l'eaaing as
follows:
"In the absence of Chairman Eccles, I acknowledge receipt of your letter of September 1, 1942, with further reference to the offer
of the Council of State Governments to
assist in obtaining
legislation or administrative acState
tion to
facilitate the war effort.
Board':In,response to your suggestion, Mr. Walter Wyatt, the
s General Counsel, has been designated to deal with
t
Council of State Governments and representatives of the
States in the subsequ
ent development and handling of the
!liggestions contained in Chairman Eccles' letter of August
41, 1942.n
Approved unanimously.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Assistant Secretary.
Approved:




Vi e Chairman