View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for

To:

Members of the Board

From:

Office of the Secretary

October 9, 1962

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve .System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard to
the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will advise
the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, please initial
below. If you were present at the meeting, your
initials will indicate approval of the minutes. If
You were not present, your initials will indicate
only that you have seen the minutes.

Chin. Martin
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. King
Gov. Mitchell

Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System on Tuesday, October

9, 1962. The Board met in the Board

Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Mills
Shepardson
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Discount rates.

Sherman, Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Fauver, Assistant to the Board
Hackley, General Counsel
Solomon, Director, Division of
Examinations
Goodman, Assistant Director, Division
of Examinations
Leavitt, Assistant Director, Division
of Examinations
Young, Senior Attorney, Legal Division
Hill, Attorney, Legal Division
Egertson, Review Examiner, Division
of Examinations

The establishment without change by the

Il deral Reserve Bank of Minneapolis on October

6, 1962, of the

rates on discounts and advances in its existing schedule was
MIC_IaKTII. unanimously, with the understanding that appropriate
advice would be sent to the Bank.
Items circulated to the Board.

The following items, copies

Of which are attached to these minutes under the respective item
Umbers indicated, were approved unanimously:
Item No.
Letter to Bank of America, New York, New York,
granting consent to the establishment by Banca
d'America e d'Italia, Milan, Italy, of branches
44d agencies in specified Italian cities.

1

10/9/62

-.2Item No.

Letter to Chippewa Trust Company, St. Louis,
Missouri, granting permission for the retirement of $100,000 outstsyding preferred stock.

2

In a discussion preceding the action granting consent to the
establishment of certain branches and agencies by Banca d'America
e WItalial Mr. Goodman responded to several questions raised by
Governor Mills. With respect to the lack of more extensive information regarding the proposed branches and agencies, he noted that
Consent to the establishment of such offices had already been given
17 the Bank of Italy. It appeared that the proposed offices would
not be particularly large operations, and there was no indication of
question from the competitive standpoint.

In these circumstances

4e had doubted the need to request further information.

As to the

condition of Banca d'America e d'Italial an audit of the bank had
recently been made by inspectors for Bank of America, New York.
ritNever, the audit report seemed rather superficial, and he anticipated
that this matter probably would be commented upon in connection
lath the current year's examination of Bank of America.

With respect

to the suggestion contained in the recent report to the Comptroller
Or the Currency by a special committee of bankers that specific
811Pervisory approval not be required for the establishment by United
States banks of overseas branches, Mr. Goodman said that a Similar

-3-

10/9/62

suggestion had been received by the Board in connection with the
current review of Regulation K.

However, since the suggestion did

not go to the provisions of the Regulation, it was covered in the
third of the series of three memoranda addressed to the Board in
connection with the current study.

With respect to a suggestion by

Governor Mills, in connection with the memoranda that had been distributed relating to the study of Regulation K, that it might be helpful
to the members of the Board if a summary could be prepared showing

the effect on the present provisions of the Regulation of the various
Proposals discussed in the memoranda, Mr. Goodman said he would give
consideration to whether a comparative summarization along the lines
mentioned could not be worked out.
Mr. Goodman then withdrew from the meeting.
Application of Union Trust Company.

There had been distrib-

Utea to the Board a memorandum from the Division of Examinations
aated September 28, 1962, in connection with an application by
Utlion Trust Company of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for permission
to Merge with The Liberty Bank, Easton, Maryland.

The Federal Reserve

ilank of Richmond and the Division of Examinations recommended
aPPr°val.

The Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation concluded that the effect of the proposed
Inerger on competition would not be unfavorable, but the Department

Cy(

-4of Justice had expressed the opinion that the merger would have
serious anti-competitive effects in the Easton area.
At the Board's request, Mr. Leavitt commented in some
detail on the application, his remarks being based substantially
°la the memorandum that had been distributed.
In a discussion that ensued, Governor Balderston referred
to certain conditions comprehended within the so-called banking
factors that would tend to support approval of the proposed
Illerger.

However, the report of the Department of Justice, which

had to do only with the competitive aspects, was adverse.
In its statements in support of orders on mergers approved

ta the past, the Board had been reluctant to make strong comments
about factors such as management deficiencies in a bank that was
being merged.

Therefore, if the Board approved the Union Trust

41115lication in the face of the adverse report from the Justice
ElePartment, his question was whether the Board's reasons would be
clear to the public.
Comments made by the staff on this point were to the
effect that if the Board should approve the proposed merger,
elferY effort would be made to present fully in the Board's stateE nt a satisfactory explanation of the factors that were felt by

the Board to warrant approval. Under the Board's practice, the
l'eloort received from the Department of Justice would not be made

10/9/62

-5-

Public by the Board at this time.

As required by law, the summary

of the Department's report would be included in the Board's Annual
Report, together with a statement of the basis for the Board's
aPproval.

The statement of the basis for approval would be

Patterned after the statement issued by the Board in support of
as order.

In this manner, it should be possible to make clear

in the Annual Report why the Board, despite the recommendation of
the Department of Justice on the competitive factors, had found
sufficient favorable considerations to conclude that the merger
/las in the public interest.
The members of the Board then expressed their views on
the merger application, and Governor Mills said that he would favor
aPProval.

He found this a rather close case, with the weak management

situation at
Liberty Bank being almost the determining factor in
his mind.

Looking ahead to the statement that would be issued by

the Board, if the merger were approved, he suggested that care be
ex
ercised not to leave the impression that an important basis for
aPProval was
the setting up of Union Trust Company as a competitor
for the
Maryland National Bank, which already had offices in the
4ston area.

If that were done, it might appear as though the

Board was encouraging the very concentration of banking resources
aboUt which it had concern.

To illustrate his point, Governor

S turned to the suggested "basis for approval" contained in
the Division memorandum and indicated how he felt that certain parts

Of it
might be modified.

3F-4St"
10/9/62

-6Governors Shepardson and Balderston indicated that they

would favor approval of the proposed merger on the basis of the
staff recommendation, and Chairman Martin expressed himself to
the same effect.
Accordingly, the application of Union Trust Company was
aPproved unanimously, with the understanding that the Legal Division
would draft for the Board's consideration an order and a supporting
statement reflecting this decision.
Messrs. Hill and Egertson then withdraw from the meeting.
Application of Union and New Haven Trust Company (Items 3-5).

Pursuant to the Board's decision on October 3, 1962, to approve the
4PPlication of The Union and New Haven Trust Company, New Haven,
Connecticut, to merge with The Madison Trust Company, Madison, Connecticut, there had been distributed drafts of an order and a supporting
statement reflecting that decision.
In discussion, Governor Mills suggested certain changes in

the proposed statement, the intent of which was to avoid implications
(3f the kind that he had cautioned against in connection with consideration
°f the Union Trust Company case just acted upon by the Board.
The suggested changes having been agreed upon, the issuance
°f the order and statement was authorized.

Copies of the order and

statement, as issued pursuant to this authorization, are attached as
itelaa 3 and 4.

A copy of the letter sent to the applicant bank is

attached
as Item No. 5.

10/9/62

-7Recent procedural change by Comptroller.

Mr. Fauver

called to the Board's attention that the Comptroller of the
Currency had instituted a procedure, in connection with the
issuance of decisions on merger cases, of releasing to the public
the competitive factor reports that had been received by him from
the other Federal bank supervisory agencies and the Department of
JUstice.

The Board had not been following such a practice.

Inquiries received by the Board concerning competitive factor
reports had been referred to the originating agency.
After a brief discussion, it was agreed to make no change

in the Board's present practice at this time.
Visit of Governor Coombs.

Reference was made to the

forthcoming visit to Washington of Governor Coombs of the Reserve
liank of Australia, and it was noted that the Governor was scheduled
to be the guest of honor at a luncheon at the Federal Reserve
81411ding on Tuesday, October 23.

The suggestion was made that,

if Governor Coombs' schedule would permit, he might be invited
also to have dinner at the Federal Reserve Building with available
Members of the Board and appropriate members of the staff.

There

agreement with this suggestion.
The meeting then adjourned.
Secretary's Note: Governor Shepardson today
approved on behalf of the Board the following
Items:

10/9/62
Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (attached
Item No 6) approving the appointment of Fred L. Bagwell as
assistant examiner.
Memoranda from appropriate individuals concerned recommending
the following actions relating to the Board's staff:
Transfer
Mary V. F. Baker, from the position of Senior Clerk in the
Division of International Finance, to the position of Statistical
Assistant in the Division of Research and Statistics, with no change
in basic annual apiary at the rate of $5,3351 effective October 14,
1962.
ary increase
Peggy H. Reaves, Senior Clerk, Division of International
Pillance, from $4,460 to $4,6750 effective October 14, 1962.
(Change in title from Clerk.)

Edna Kiatta Noyes, Statistical Clerk, Division of Bank Operations,
ror the period beginning September 30 through October 31, 1962.

Secretary

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 1
10/9/62

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

October 9, 1962

Bank of America,
41 Broad Street,
New York 15, New York.
Gentlemen:
In accordance with the request contained in your letter
of September 11, 1962, transmitted through the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, the Board of Governors grants its consent to
the establishment by Banca d'America e d'Italia, Milan, Italy,
of branches and agencies in the following Italian cities:
Branches
Salerno
Taranto
Arenzano (Province of Genoa)
Agencies
Milan - Garibaldi District
Rome - Due Pin! District
Turin - Barriera Milano
Bologna - Via A. Saffi District
Unless the branches and agencies are actually established
and opened for business on or before November 1, 1963, all rights
.ranted hereby will be deemed to have been abandoned and the authorltY hereby granted will automatically terminate on that date.
It is understood that Banca d'Italia has granted permission
tO the establishment of these branches and agencies.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Elizabeth L. Carmichael
Elizabeth L. Carmichael,
Assistant Secretary.

aDARD

OF GOVERNORS
Item No. 2
10/9/62

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

October 90 1962

Board of Directors,
Chippewa Trust Company,
St. Louis, Missouri.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System hereby gives its consent, under the provisions of
Section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act, to the retirement
of $100,000 outstanding preferred stock of Chippewa Trust
Company. This approval is given with the understanding
that capital structure of the bank will be increased by
not less than $130,000 by December 31, 1962, through the
sale of common stock for cash. The Board notes that outstanding capital notes in the amount of $100,000 maturing
November 15, 1962, are to be paid.
Very truly yours,

(Signed) Elizabeth L. Carmichael

Elizabeth L. Carmichael,
Assistant Secretary.

Item No. 3
10/9/62

UNITED STATES OF ATAERICA
SYSTEM
BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE
WASHINGTON, D. C.

In the Itztter of the Application of
IRE

UNION AND NEW HAVEN TRUST COIPANY

aporoval of merger with
"le iladison Trust Company

ORDER APPROVING MERGER OF BANKS
to
There has come before the Board of Governors, pursuant
the Bank Merger Act of 1960 (12 U.S.C, 1828(c))„ an ap)lication by
The ,•
Connecticut, a member
1J"lon and Now Haven Trust Company, New Haven,
bayq,
of the Federal eserve System, for the Boardts prior approval of
them
-,creer of that bank and The iladison Trust Company, Madison, Connecticut,
1111cler the charter and title of the former and, as an incident to the merger,
branch would be operated at the location of The Madison Trust Company.
Board, has been
11()tice of the proposed merger, in form approved by the
Ishod pursuant to said Act.
light of
Upon consideration of all relevant material in the
the

-tactors set forth in said Act, including reports furnished by the

elriPtroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
tho Department of Justice on the competitive factors involved in
the

Proposed merger,

IT IS HETZE9Y ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the
Board's Statement of this date, that said application be and hereby is
aPproved, provided that said merger shall not be consummated (a) within
seven calendar days after the date of this Order or (b) later than three
Months after said date.
Dated at Washington, D. C.1 this 9th day of October, 1962.
By Order of the Board of Governors.
Voting for this action: Chairman Martin, and
Governors Balderston, Mills, Shepardson, and Mitchell.
Absent and not voting:

Governors Robertson and King.

(Signed) Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

(SUL)

Item No.

4

10/9/62

BOARD 07 GOVERNORS
CF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
APPLICATION DY THE UNION AND NEW HAEN TRUST COITANY
FOR APPROVAL 07 MEHGE,i, IIITH THE n:iDISql TRUST COMPANY

STATEMENT
The Union and New Haven Trust Company, New Haven, Connecticut
"Icn Trust"), with deoesits e
1961
3

, 714 million as of October 10,
abo'A'3

a State member bank, has applied, pursuant to the Bank Merger Act

merger
of196° (12 U.S.C. 1028(c)), for the Boardls prior approval of the
()-f that
bank and The Madison Trust Company, Madison, Connecticut Madison
6 with deposits of about
P,Rr,

million as of March 5, 1962.

Under the

or-it of Merger the banks would merge under the charter and title of

t;11111 Trust, and the office of Madison

Trust would become a branch of

Tru-t.
Under the Act, the Board is required to consider (1) the
cial history and condition of each of the banks involved, (2) the
qkla-cY of its capital structure, (3) its future earnings prospects,
(4) th
o genera' character of its management, (5) whether its corporate
'rs are consistent with the purposes of 12 U.S.C., Ch. 16 (the
NraQr
a1 Deposit Insurance Act); (6) the convenience and needs of the

-2community to be served, and (7) the effect of the transaction on
e°mPetition (including any tendency toward monopoly).

The Board may

not approve the transaction unless, after considering all these
factors, it finds the transaction to be in the public interest.
re,
Banking factors, - The financial condition, capital structu
future earnings prospects, and management of each of the banks are
satdsfactory, as would be true of the resulting bank.
There is no indication that the powers of either of the
banks are, or would be, inconsistent with 12 U.S.C., Ch, 16.
of
Convenience and needs of the communities. - The economy
•M•IM•Mi~M•01

Mell Raven

light
(1960 population about 152)000) is baJed upon heavy and

ind'Istry. and is also influenced substantially by Yale Universityls
location in the city.

The proposed merger would have little effect on

thc) c onvenience and needs of the communities now served by Union Trubt,
located in
Presently operates seven offices in five cities all
Hell/ Haven County. Union Truot is the third largest among the six comillrcial banks in New Haven and as a result of the merger would advance
t° sccond position but by only a narrow margin.
residential
Madison (1960 population about 4,500) is a growing
arld rcsort community, located in New Haven County on Long Island Sound,
19 m.,
its
14-es east of New Haven. At the height of the tourist season,
P°Ipulation is estimated to be about 150000.

iladison is primarily a

establish1‘°sidontial community with the customary retail and service
' Dairy and truck farming are the main occupations in the outyears and
arca, Madtionts population has increased rapidly in recent
•
the
re is every prospect this will continue.

lilt

if,t2tr(

in
1:ndison Trust is the only bank, commercial or savings,
nEldison.

somewhat larger,
Three other banks, one slightly smaller and two

11'-ve offices from four to five miles away.

As Connecticut law prohibits

the establishment by commercial banks of de novo branches in another city
ill which any comercial bank has its head office, :adison Trust is the
grcuing
°11.1Y bank which may now legal-I.:: establish branches in ladison. The
iladison area would benefit by the wonosed merger as broader banking serother
Vices would thereby be made available and a basis laid for bringing
e()tiPetitive banking services into the connunity.
and 1Mison
Cornetition. - The nearest of ices of Union Trust
are about 19 miles apart.

Between these offices, there are five

°ffficos of other commercial banks and one office of a savings bank.

Inter-

Trust and
offices and the distance betueen the offices of Union
amount of
liadison Trust limit competition between them. Only a slight
c°I -Potition would be eliminated by the proposed merger.

Consummation of

Haven
this Pr000sed merger would have very little effect on banks in the New
area
It would also have only a minor effect on banks in the Ladison
which are
well established and which serve their can trade areas.
be elimiSummary and conclusion. -Very little competition will
flatn,, by
banking focilithis proposed merger inasmuch as there are several
tiQ-s between the nearest offices of the two banks which are 19 miles apart.
The -kladison area is grcwing.

A merger of these two banks will

lay
'°vido broader banking services for which a need exists and will
Pl

the

b`lsis for increased banking competition in the area and additional banking
zervices for the public.
in the
Accordingly, the Board finds the proosed merger to be
PlIblic interest.
°etoher

1962

Jt

Item No.

5

10/9/62

BOARD OF E3OVERNOR8
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, 0. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL COKIRESIPONOENCE
TO THE BOARD

October 9

1962.

a.J
TERED - RETURN
RECIE5T RE UESTED
,
111,,le Union and New Haven Trust Company,
'u.5 Church Street,
Ilev Haven, Connecticut.
lemen:
The Board of Governors has approved the application, under
the
co
Dank Merger Act of 1960 (12 U.S.C. 1828(c)), for the Board's prior
sent to the merger of The Madison Trust Company, Madison, Connecticut
4C13 The Union and New Haven Trust Company, New Haven, Connecticut.
It is understood that within 30 days following the effective
ate
216 f the merger The Union and New Haven Trust Company will sell the
shares of its own stock which it will acquire under the merger.
Enclosed are the Board's Order of this date, the accompanying
t, and the press release on this action.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.
ci

ure

4, •

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No.

OF THE

,.•.DOT Gov.!.

'•

6

10/9/62

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADDRESS arricIAL CORRESPONDENCE

•

TO THE BOARD

RESts-••
••....••

October 10, 1962

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
Mr. John L. Nosker, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond,
Richmond 13, Virginia.
Dear Mr. Nosker:
In accordance with the request contained in
your letter of October 4, 1962, the Board approves the
appointment of Fred L. Bagwell as an assistant examiner
for the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, effective
today.
It is noted that Mr. Bagwell is indebted to The
Peoples National Bank of Greenville, Greenville, South
Carolina.. Accordingly, the Board's approval of
Mr. Bagwell's appointment is given with the understanding
that he will not participate in any examination of that
institution until his indebtedness has been liquidated.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Elizabeth L. Carmichael
Elizabeth L. Carmichael,
Assistant Secretary.

r