View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1361

A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System was held in Washington on Saturday, October 4, 1941, at 11:30
a.m.
PRESENT: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Szymczak
McKee
Draper

Mr. Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Clayton, Assistant to the Chairman
The action stated with respect to each of the matters hereinafter referred to was taken by the Board:
The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System held on October 3, 1941, were approved unanimously.
It was stated that the temporary appointment of Mr. Cravens
as a consultant in the Division of Security Loans was about to expire,
that his services were needed for a further period, and that if compensation was to be continued the Board should take action on the matter today.




By unanimous vote, approval was
given to the continuation of the employment of Mr. Cravens for an indefinite temporary period, with salary at
the rate of 14,500 per annum, a per
diem allowance of n.0.00 in lieu of
subsistence during the period of his
temporary employment, and reimbursement for his actual necessary transportation expenses between Cleveland
and Washington as well as his actual
necessary transportation expenses to
and from other points in the United
States to which he might be sent under

1_362
-2proper written travel authorization on official business of the Board.
In connection with the above action,
approval was given to an increase in the
appropriate item of the budget of the Division of Security Loans to cover Mr. Cravens'
per diem allowance and transportation expenses during the remainder of the current
year.
Memorandum dated October 3, 1941, from Mr. Nelson, Assistant Secretary, submitting the resignation of Mary M. Diegelm
an as a
charwoman in the Building Operation

and Maintenance Section of the

Secretary's Office, to become effective at 9 p.m. on Friday, October

3) 1941.
The resignation was accepted.
Memoranda dated October 1, 1941, from Mr. Goldenweiser, Director of the Division of Research and Statistics, submitting the
resignations of Emile Despres as a senior
economist and Guy Nunn as
a Junior economist in that Division, to become effective as of the
Close of business on October 5 and October 1, 1941,
respectively,
and recommending that the resignations be accepted
as of those dates.
The resignations were accepted.
Memorandum dated September 27, 1941, from Mr. Goldenweiser,
Director of the Division of Researc
h and Statistics, submitting the
'
l esignation of Alfred Sherrard as a junior economist
in the Division
Of Research and Statistics, to become effecti
ve as of the close of
bUsiness on September 28, 1941, and recomme
nding that the resignation




1_363
10/4/41

-3-

be accepted as of that date.
The resignation was accepted.
Memorandum dated October 3, 19411 from Mr. Smead, Chief of
the Division of Bank Operations, submitting the resignation of Jerry
L. Williams as a messenger in that Division, to become effective as
of the close of business on September 301 19411 and recommend
ing that
the resignation be accepted as of that date.
The resignation was accepted.
Telegram to the Presidents of all of the Federal Reserve Banks
reading as follows:
"Reg. W-88. Part 3(a) of the Supplement to Regulation W provides that the maximum credit value of a new
automobile shall be 66 2/3 per cent of the purchase price
but that such maximum credit value shall in no event exceed 66 2/3 per cent of the sum of items numbered 1 through
4 as set forth under part 3(a). In this connection, the
Board has received several questions as to the amounts
which may be included under that portion of item 4 which
permits the inclusion of 'Any bona fide charges for delivery . . . not included in the foregoing items.'
"In general this provision permits only the inclusion
of bona fide charges for services which are actually rendered by the seller in connection with the delivery of a
new automobile and which are not included in the manufacturer's retail quotation (item 1) or in transportation
charges (item 2). For example, charges for such services
as lubricating, cleaning, polishing, or otherwise conditioning the car may not be included under item 4 if these
services are included in item 1 or 2; but in case any
such services are not included in items 1 and 21 a charge
Which is reasonably related to the value of such services
may be included in item 4. Likewise, where the contract
of sale includes any additional services connected with
the delivery of the car, such as greasing the car for a
certain period or providing antifreeze, a reasonable charge




1364
10/4/41

-4-

"for such services may be included in item 4. On the
other hand there may not be included in item 4 a charge
which the dealer may make for 'advertising' or for 'warehousing', nor any other charges which the dealer may make
except bona fide charges for services which are actually
rendered by the seller to the purchaser and are not included in items 1 and 2."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Phillips, Assistant Cashier of the Federal Reserve

Bank of Kansas City, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of September 22,
1941, presenting a case under RegulationW in which a
farmer obtains an unsecured single-payment loan from a
bank for the purpose of making a down payment on the purchase price of an automobile, and is to pay the dealer
the remaining amount of the cost of the automobile in
one sum six months from date.
"It is understood that the two obligations are to
be repaid at different times, and the question presented
is whether there is an extension of instalment credit
within the meaning of the Regulation.
"In the absence of some arrangement between the
dealer and the bank which would be subject to the principles set out in W-161 it is the view of the Board that
in the case you present there are two separate extensions
of credit neither of which is instalment credit within
the meaning of the present regulation."
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. Phillips, Assistant Cashier of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, reading as follows:
"Your letter September 17 re itemizing finance charges
in Missouri. Under second paragraph of W-84 terminology
Of section 4(f) need not be used. Hence the t106 difference between cash price and time price in example included
with your letter could be listed as 'adjustment for time
price and insurance' or by some other such term. If this
does not solve problem and further advice is desired, it




1865
10/4/41

-5-

"would be helpful to have citations to Missouri statutes
or cases which cause difficulty."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Hr. Miner, President of the Guardian Management Corporation, Washington, D. C., reading as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of September
30, 1941 asking for information regarding the financing
of insurance premiums under the regulation dealing with
consumer credit.
"A copy of Regulation V: is enclosed and your attention is invited particularly to sections 4 and 5. It is
not clear from your letter whether the premium will be
financed by the insurance company or by a finance company
or other person. If the premiums are financed by the insurance company there would be an extension of 'instalment
sale credit' as defined in section 2(d) of the Regulation,
and since insurance is not a 'listed article' the Regulation would not be applicable.
"On the other hand, if the insurance is financed by
someone other than the seller and if the amount does not
exceed $1,000, the credit could not be extended for more
than 18 months in view of the provisions of section 5(b)
of the Regulation.
"These provisions of sections 4 and 5 are subject to
certain exceptions which are stated in section 6; and section 6(i) may exempt certain transactions which you have
in mind.
"The administration of Regulation VI has been decentralized, and therefore if you have any further inquiries
in this connection it is suggested that you address them
to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond."
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated September 30, 1941, from Mr. Parry, Chief of
the

Division of Security Loans, recommending that the Board reimburse
Mr. n
I. Behrens of Ludwig Baumann, New York, New York, for expenses
incurred by him in connection
with trips which he made to Washington




1366

10/4/41
on September 18 and September 23, 1941, at the Board's request,to dis—
cuss problems arising under Regulation W.




Approved unanimously.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Assistant Secretary.

Chairman.