View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1118

A. meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
SYstem was held in Washington on Monday, October 31, 1938, at 11:00
a. m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Szymczak
McKee
Davis
Draper

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Morrill, Secretary
Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Clayton, Assistant to the Chairman

The action stated with respect to each of the matters hereinafter referred
to was taken by the Board:
The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Governors of the
Isderal

Reserve System held on October 29, 1938, were approved unani

Moil81y.

Memorandum dated October 24, 1938, from Mr. Goldenweiser,
tirsetor of the
Division of Research and Statistics, recommending
that,
lor the reason stated in the memorandum, the salary of Leroy
4* Piser, Senior
Economist in the Division, be increased to 0,400
Per snnwn.
The recommendation was approved
unanimously, to be effective immediately.
Letter to Mr. /bung, Vice President of the Federal Reserve

Bank of
Chicago, reading as follows:
"As you know, the unsatisfactory situation with respect to 'The State Bsrk of Geneva', Geneva, Illinois, with




10/31/38
"particular reference to the domination of its management
by President Oscar Nelson and the large aggregate of credit
extended to him and his interests, has been the subject of
correspondence and informal discussion with your office
during recent years.
"The report of examination of the bank as of May 14,
1934) contained unfavorable comments on the management in
view of which the Board wrote Federal Reserve Agent Stevens
on October 2, 1934, and asked that it be kept advised as
to the action taken to provide the bank with a capable
management as it was reported that 'the influence of President Oscar Nelson, who dominates the institution completely,
is distinctly detrimental to the interests of the dePositors and stockholders.' In your reply dated October
4, 1934, you stated that Mr. Nelson had been called into
Your office on several occasions since the examination
When the unsatisfactory situation was discussed with him
and that you did not think it would be in the public interest at the time, regardless of remarks concerning Mr.
Nelson, to have him completely removed from the bank as
the depositing public had confidence in him and you were
afraid of an unfavorable reaction if his connection with
the bank were severed. You also stated you were firmly
Of the opinion
that an officer of force should be employed
and that Mr. Nelson should remain as the nominal head of
the bank but shorn of responsibility as to loans.
'Various correspondence subsequently passed between
Your office and the Board relating to the management situation and the concentration of credit to Mr. Nelson and his
Interests. During this time you reported that the State
banking authorities were following the situation closely,
that one of the State department's representatives who
lived in Geneva was working persistently on the case, that
You were keeping in close touch with the State authorities,
and that you felt, in the circumstances, it was preferable
to work
through them for an improvement of the situation.
In Your letter of May 19, 1936, you reported that the pressure which the State banking authorities had been exerting
!las bearing fruit and that it was your understanding that
Mr. Nelson was slowly fading out as the dominant factor.
On November
28, 1936, you again advised the Board that
You felt everything possible was being done at the time
to ,
i- mprove
the situation and that you should not further
disturb the situation but should continue to work through
the State
banking department.




'
I.

10/31/38
"Your letter of Icebruary 4, 1937, reported that you
had been informed by the State authorities that Mr. Nelson
had been reelected president, without salary, that two
new directors had been elected to the board, end that the
State examiner who had been following the situation was
Of the opinion that Mr. Nelson would have practically no
influence on the bank's future operations.
"however, the data transmitted with your letter of
January 7, 1938, indicated that Mr. Nelson was again in
active charge and the report of your examiner, who had recently visited the bank, stated that he had conferred
With a majority of the members of the bank's board of directors, discussing with them the matter of Mr. Nelson's
management and that these directors felt that Mr. Nelson
was the individual best suited to work out the situation
of the bank.
"The report of examination of the bank as of May 31,
1938, again reported criticisms of President Nelson's management and stated that it seemed imperative for the bank to
be placed under a new active management. The examination
.
disclosed
that little real progress had been made in reducing the aggregate extensions of credit to Mr. Nelson and
his interests and the examiner stated he believed President
Nelson should be warned in accordance with the provisions
OF Section 30 of the Banking Act of 1933 against a con- 111uance of his present practices regarding loans to his
interests.
"In July you indicated informally that while in the
Pest the State bankinf: authorities had felt that they
could work out the situation and preferred to handle it in
that manner, it was their view that the time had come for
he Federal Reserve authorities to take a more active part
in trying to obtain the desired corrections and improvements,
"In view of the efforts which have been made in the
Past our years to have the affairs of the bank conducted
along sound lines and the fact that little progress apParently has been made in strengthening the management
and in materially reducing and placing the extensions of
credit to Mr. Nelson and his interests in a satisfactory
condition, it is felt that the existing situation should
no longer be tolerated and that prompt and definite action
should be taken to assure that the bank's affairs will
be Properly conducted.




10/31/38

-4-

"It will be appreciated if you will advise the Board
as to the steps which your office will take to effect a
correction of the present unsatisfactory situation."
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated October 29, 1938, fromMr. Parry, Chief of
the Division
of Security Loans, reading as follows:
"The Trading and Exchange Division of the SEC, acting
by direction of the Commission and working through its
section of Research and Statistics in collaboration with
the Board's Division of Security Loans, has developed after
extensive negotiation with the New York Stock Exchange
certain plans for revising and extending the Commission's
reporting service. The revision would include releasing
certain member firms of the Exchange (about 19 firms)
from an SEC arrangement effected about two years ago by
Which these firms make certain monthly reports on 'restricted accounts' (reports are being made under increasprotest), and the extension would consist of developing
reporting service designed to show currently several
new items, viz, the increase or decrease in the total
number of margin accounts carried by member firms, also
in the number of active margin accounts and active cash
accounts; the shifts from time to time in the proportion
of the total trading (in stocks) that is represented by
!margin accounts as compared with cash accounts; and most
important of all current information as to whether, from
Week to week or month to month, the net balance of trading for margin traders and cash traders, respectively,
has been on the buying side or on the selling side.
.
"It seems to me that current figures of this description would be of great value to the Board (as well as to
the Commission), end that the Board should do all that
It reasonably can to help along such a reporting service
'lad to influence its development along constructive
lines.
"It is a matter of common agreement, however, among
representatives of the SEC, of the Stock Exchange, and
ourselves, that before any decision is made to inaugurate
anY each reporting service there should be a preliminary
that will provide relevant facts and figures to be




1122
10/31/38

-5-

"studied by the Commission, the Exchange, end the Board.
The Exchange has participated in devising appropriate
schedules for such a survey, and is now willing to rake
the survey and to give copies of the returns both to the
Commission and to the Board -- on two conditions. These
conditions, which seem to me to be altogether reasonable,
are (1) that the Exchange may say to its member firms
that the survey has been requested, or at least that it
has been suggested, by the Commission and the Board, and
(2) that the Exchange is to reserve iudgment as to whether
l'iEures of this description will be of value and is not
to give in advance any indication that the Exchange will
eventually consider the inauguration of a regular reporting service along these lines to be either necessary or
desirable.
"The Exchange is ready to start the preliminary survey
as soon as an appropriate letter from the Exchange to its
member firms, of which a tentative draft is attached, can
be agreed upon. This draft has been worked out by cooperation between the Economist of the New York Stock Exchange,
representatives of the SEC, and myself. It requests the
member firms to provide the desired data and does so in
a manner that conforms to the two conditions that have been
specified above.
"It is my recommendation that the Board authorize the
inclusion by the Exchange in its letter to member firms,
in connection with the letter's reference to the Commissions of a similar reference to the Board, provided that
reference is substantially in terms and context illustrated
by the attached draft letter."
The recommendation was approved
unanimously.
Memorandum dated October 24, 1938, from Mr. Goldenweiser,
I)ire"or of the Division of Research and Statistics, referring to the
"tion taken by the Board on June 23, 1938, and stating that a request
had
llow been received for a contribution by the Board, in conjunction
with contributions by other Governmental agencies and certain private
organizations, for technical assistance on the study of corporate bonds




112P,
10/31/38

-6-

now being planned as a WPA project to be sponsored by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation and conducted under the direction of
the National
Bureau of Economic Research; the Board's contribution
to be in
the form of assigning to the work a member of the staff of
its

Division of Research and Statistics and paying the expenses of travel

in e°nnection with the project, such contribution, figured in dollars,
ezaounting to
$6,250.

The memorandum also stated that the project will

sUPPlY comprehensive data on corporate financing and yields of corporate
bonds since 1900
and on experience with bond ratings, and that such
data will fill important gaps in the Board's data on corporate bonds
44d help in a number of ways to give more adequate service on problems
coming before
the Board.

Another use of the study, the memorandum

ed, will be in connection with the problem of developing standards
tor bank
investments in corporate bonds.

The memorandum recommended,

therefore, that the Board cooperate in the study to the extent set
r°1"th above.
Approved unanimously.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

4Proved:




Chairnt

•