View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for October 30, 1957

To:

Members of the Board

From: Office of the Secretary
Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard
to the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will
advise the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, if you
were present at the meeting, please initial in column A, below to indicate that you approve the minutes.
If you were not present, please initial in column B
below to indicate that you have seen the minutes.
A
Chm. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
Gov. Vardaman
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson




31
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Wednesday, October

30, 1957. The Board

met in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Balderston, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
Vardaman
Robertson
Shepardson
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Leonard, Director, Division of Bank Operations
Masters, Director, Division of Examinations
Solomon, Assistant General Counsel
Horbett, Associate Director, Division of Bank
Operations
Hexter, Assistant General Counsel
Hostrup, Assistant Director, Division of
Exnmlnations
Davis, Assistant Counsel
Thompson, Supervisory Review Examiner, Division
of Examinations

Items circulated to the Board.

The following items, which had

been circulated to the members of the Board and copies of which are
attached to these minutes under the respective item numbers indicated,
were approved unanimously:
Item No.
Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
extending the time within which The Marine Trust
Company of Western New York, Buffalo, New York,
may establish a branch in Cheektowaga, New York.

Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

2

extending the time within which The Union Commerce
Bank, Cleveland, Ohio, may establish a branch at
Triskett and Berea Roads.
Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
Waiving the requirement of six months' notice of
Withdrawal from System membership for The State
Bank of Whitehall, Whitehall, Michigan.




3

10/30/57

-2-

Letter to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regarding the application of American Bank and Trust Company,
Bessemer, Alabama, for continuance of deposit insurance
after withdrawal from membership in the Federal Reserve
System.

Item No.
14-

Letter to the Presidents of all Federal Reserve Banks regarding an expansion of the banking structure data compiled
for the ODM Damage Assessment Center. (With the understanding
that the letter would be sent when the pertinent form (F.R. 175)
had been cleared by the Bureau of the Budget and that the
Board's Defense Planning budget would include $1,500 to
reimburse the Bureau of the Census for determining the latitude
and longitude locations of the selected banks and branches in
order to enable the Office of Defense Mobilization to convert
the locations to equivalent um grid coordinates) 1/

5

Messrs. Leonard and Horbett then withdrew from the meeting.
Applications to organize national banks at Grants, New Mexico
(Items

6 and 7). In view of questions raised by Governor Shepardson at

yesterday's meeting, it was agreed at that time to defer action on proposed
letters to the Comptroller of the Currency with respect to separate applications by Mr. Phil C. Bennett and associates and by Mr. Sterling F. Black
and associates to organize national banks at Grants, New Mexico. The letter
on the Bennett application would recommend favorably, while the letter on
the Black application would recommend unfavorably.
Governor Robertson said that upon further review of the respective
files he considered the proposed letters satisfactory.

While the letter

on the Bennett application might be expanded to spell out that arrangements
would have to be made to meet the statutory requirements relative to residence of directors, he felt that the reference included in the letter to
1/ The approved letter reflected a minor change in language suggested by
Mr. Horbett at this meeting.




.3079

-3-

10/30/57

the fact that some of the proposed directors apparently did not meet the
residential qualifications was sufficient to call attention to the matter.
In neither case, he pointed out, did the recommendation hinge on the
residential qualifications of the directors.

With respect to the Bennett

application, it appeared evident that the people sponsoring the application would furnish adequate capital and would provide the bank with
good management, while in the case of the Black application these factors
appeared less favorable.

Accordingly, it was his opinion that the Federal

Reserve Bank of Kansas City and the Board's Division of Examinations had
recommended properly with respect to each application.
At the request of the Board the Secretary then read the two
proposed letters, following which Governor Shepardson indicated that he
would be agreeable to sending them in the form in which they were submitted.

He brought out that the questions which he raised at yesterday's

meeting did not relate to the basic merits of the respective applications,
that he concurred in the recommendations of the Reserve Bank and the
Division of Examinations, and that he had wanted merely to be certain
that the applications could properly be distinguished on grounds other
than the places of residence of the proposed directors.
Thereupon, unanimous approval was given to the proposed letters
to the Comptroller of the Currency in the form attached hereto as Items

6 and 71 respectively, with the understanding that copies would be sent
to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.




10/30/57
Application of Northwest Bancorporation.

With Governors Vardaman

and Mills dissenting, the Board decided at the meeting yesterday to deny
the application of Northwest Bancorporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, filed
pursuant to section 3(a)(2) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, for
prior approval of the acquisition by it of 1,450 out of a total of 1,500
voting shares of the proposed Northwestern State Bank, Rochester, Minnesota.
At the beginning of this meeting there were distributed to the members of
the Board copies of a draft of statement and order which might be issued
for the purpose of carrying out the Board's decision.
Governor Vardaman stated that he would like to have his dissent
recorded in the order in view of the fact that the order was subject to
possible appeal to the courts.

Since he did not know, of course, how

Governor Mills would feel in this regard, he suggested contacting him or
withholding the issuance of the order until his return.
Following a statement by Mr. Masters that the Division of ExPminations
was aware of no great pressure to have the matter expedited, Mr. Carpenter
reported on telephone conversations which he had had at the Board's request
with Mr. Deming President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,
)
because of the Minneapolis Bank's favorable recommendation on the application.

He said that Mr. Deming and an officer of the Reserve Bank repre-

senting the bank examination function would be glad to meet with the Board
if the Board so desired, but that Mr. Deming did not think they could add
anything of substance to what was already in, the record.




Therefore

the

30S1
-5-

10/30/57

only purpose of such a meeting would be to present personally the information already submitted.

Mr. Deming, he said, recognized that this was

an extremely difficult case on which to reach a decision.
With reference to the point raised by Governor Vardaman, which
included also the opinion that an order issued in a matter of this kind
should reflect the names of any members of the Board who did not participate
in the decision, Governor Robertson inquired concerning the practices of
other Government agencies.
Mr. Solomon responded that although he was not certain, he believed
it was the general practice of such agencies to issue a formal order along
the lines of a court order, with an indication of any dissents or absences.
Governor Robertson then stated that the question of setting forth
votes in such an order was not of great concern to him one way or the
other.

He suggested, however, that the Board might want to check whether

such a procedure would be out of line with that of other Government agencies,
for if they did not follow the practice of showing votes it might be questionable whether the Board should do so.

He went on to point out that this

case would establish a precedent because it was the first one involving
formal denial of an application under the Bank Holding Company Act.
Therefore, he felt that the Board should consider the matter carefully
before deciding what procedure to follow.

In this connection, he commented

that ordinarily the Board had followed the policy of standing together
behind any majority decision.

To set forth the votes would, as he pointed

out, represent a deviation from this general policy.




30q2
-6-

103057

In further discussion, agreement was expressed with the view that
the Board, if it began the practice of showing votes cast and members
absent or not participating in orders denying applications under the Bank
Holding Company Act, would logically have to follow the same practice in
connection with orders granting applications.
Governor Balderston then suggested to Mr. Solomon that the staff
look into the practices of other Government agencies and report to the
Board at another meeting.
Governor Vardaman suggested that the Legal Division also prepare a
draft of order which might be issued in this case showing the names of
members of the Board dissenting or not participating.

In this connection,

he said that he was not interested in preparing a dissenting opinion and
that he would be satisfied if the order showed simply that he had dissented
from the finding.
Consideration then was given to the content of the statement
Proposed to be issued by the Board on the Rochester application, and
Governor Vardaman stated that he regarded the document as satisfactory if
the Board wished to established a precedent of going into the amount of
detail contained in the draft.
In response to a question by Governor Vardaman on this point,
Mr. Solomon stated that the staff, in preparing the document, had in mind
the requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act that the reasons be
given when an application of this kind was denied and also that the statement should provide support, to the extent feasible, for the Board's action
in the event of appeal.




3083
10/30/57

-7-

Governor Robertson inquired of Mr. Solomon whether he considered
it essential to issue a statement and order rather than to advise the
applicant of the Board's decision in the form of a letter.
Mr. Solomon replied in the negative, stating that the only thing
that was essential was to issue some kind of order which would be appealable and to provide some statement of reasons.

If preferred by the Board,

the matter could be handled through a letter to the applicant and a brief
order containing the decision.
Governor Robertson then expressed the view that the farther the
Board went in the direction of formality in matters of this kind, the more
difficult its job would become.

If such matters could be handled on as

informal a basis as possible consistent with safeguarding the rights of
the parties, he thought the Board would have done everything necessary.
Governor Vardaman agreed with the desirability of keeping procedures
on as informal a basis as seemed appropriate, but suggested that there was
a limit to which informality could be carried.

In handing down a decision

in a matter like the Rochester application, he felt that the issuance of
a statement and order would be preferable from the standpoint of all
Parties concerned, particularly in the event that the applicant should
desire to appeal the decision to the courts.
There ensued a discussion concerning pertinent provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act and the nature of the record that the Board
would submit to a court in the event of appeal, following which Governor




3O84
-8-

10/30/57

Robertson stated that he continued to feel that the Board should not
deviate any more than necessary from the procedures customarily followed
in the handling of bank supervisory matters.
Governor Vardaman then stated that it made no great difference
to him whether a statement or letter was used, provided the order issued
by the Board reflected dissenting votes and members not participating in
the decision.

His only question regarding the statement which had been

drafted, he said, had to do with the amount of detail included therein.
Governor Robertson suggested certain material which he felt might
be eliminated from the statement and said that he thought further simplification could be effected if the matter were put in the form of a letter
rather than a statement.
With reference to the content of the statement, Mr. Hexter said
that as far as the problem of advising the applicant was concerned,
admittedly a relatively brief letter might be sufficient.

However, if

such a letter were to become part of the record in an appeal, the court
might regard the letter as not having been appropriately drafted.
After additional discussion, the Legal Division was requested to
submit a draft of letter, which might be used in lieu of the statement,
for consideration by the Board at a meeting on Friday of this week.

This

contemplated that final action would be deferred until Monday of next week
)
in order to permit Governor Mills to express his views particularly on
the question of indicating in the order that he had dissented from the
decision on this application.




308
10/30/57
Governor Vardaman suggested that the legal staff be prepared
on Friday to offer further views with respect to the use of a statement
rather than a letter in advising the applicant.

The meeting then adjourned.

Secretary's Notes: The Chairman of the Federal
Reserve Bank of San Francisco having advised
the Board that Mr. Robert J. Cannon, President
of Cannon Electric Company, Los Angeles, California, would accept appointment if tendered
as a director of the Los Angeles Branch, a
telegram was sent to Mr. Cannon today, pursuant
to the action of the Board on September 16, 1957,
advising him of his appointment as a director for
)
the remainder of the term expiring December 31

1957.
Governor Shepardson today approved on behalf of
the Board a letter to the Federal Reserve Bank
of Atlanta approving the designation of Jack
Daniel Hardage as special assistant examiner.
A copy of the letter is attached hereto as Item
No. 8.
In accordance with recommendations contained in
memoranda from appropriate individuals concerned,
Governor Shepardson also approved today on behnif
of the Board the following items affecting the
Board's staff:
Appointment
John C. Simmons as Laborer in the Division of Administrative Services,
with basic annual salary at the rate of $2,745, effective the date he
assumes his duties.
Salary increases, effective November 3, 1957
Division of Research and Statistics
A. Jane Moore, Economist, from $6,115 to $6,250 per annum.
Natalie C. Strader, Statistical Assistant, from $4,075 to $4,210 per
annum.




3086

10/30/57

-10-

Salary increases, effective November 3, 1957 (continued)
Division of Examinations
Charles H. Bartz, Federal Reserve Examiner, from $7,035 to $7,250
per annum.
William S. Wait, Review Examiner, from $7,570 to $7,785 per annum.
Division of Administrative Services
Albert C. Bain, Telegraph Operator, from $40075 to $4,210 per annum.
Wilhelmina K. Steele, Operator, Tabulating Equipment, from $3,175 to
$3,260 per annum.




4...)

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, O. C.

Item No. 1
10/30/57

.tOONESS OFFICIAL COPHIESPONOENCE
TO THE I30AR'D

October 30, 1957

Mr. R. B. Wiltse, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
New York 45, New York.
Dear Mr. Wiltse:
Reference is made to your letter of October 17, 19570
transmitting the request of The Marine Trust Company of Western
New York, Buffalo) New York, for an extension of time in which
to establish a branch on the north side of New Walden Avenue,
approximately 570 feet east of the east line of Harlem Road in
an unincorporated area of the Town of Cheektowaga, Erie County,
New York.
In view of the delays encountered in completing con—
struction of the branch building, the Board concurs in your
favorable recommendation and extends to March 3, 1958, the time
within which The Marine Trust Company of Western New York may
establish the above described branch as originally approved in
the Board's letter of December 3, 1956.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

1-'44

3088
IJOARD OF 130VERNO1S
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 2
10/30/57

WASHINGTON 25, O. C.

ADORC313 OFFICIAL COHREEIFIONOENCE
TO THE flOARCI

October 300 1957

/A-. Paul C. Stetzelberger,
Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland,
Cleveland 1, Ohio.
Dear Yr. Stetzelberger:
In view of the circumstances outlined in your letter
of October 21, 1957 and the Reserve Bank's favorable recom)
mendation, the Board of Governors extends until January 25,
1958, the time within which The Union Commerce Bank, Cleveland,
Ohio, may establish an in-town branch at Triskett and Berea
Roads, under the authorization contained in its letter of
October 31 1956.
)




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

3089
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF. THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

Item No. 3

10/30/57
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

October 30, 1957

Mr. W. R. Diercks, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago,
Chicago 90, Illinois.
Dear Mr. Diercks:
Reference is made to your letter of October 17, 1957, enclosing a resolution adopted by the board of directors of The State Bank of
Whitehall, Whitehall, Michigan, signifying its intention to withdraw
from membership in the Federal Reserve System, and a letter requesting
waiver of the six months' notice of such withdrawal and setting forth
the reason for withdrawal. A copy of opinion of Counsel regarding the
resolution was also received.
In accordance with the bank's request, the Board of Governors
waives the requirement of six months' notice of withdrawal. Accordingly,
upon surrender of the Federal Reserve Bank stock issued to the bank, you
are authorized to cancel such stock and make appropriate refund thereon.
Under the provisions of section 10 (c) of Regulation H, as amended effective September 1, 1952, the bank may accomplish termination of its membership at any time within eight months after notice of intention to
withdraw is given. Please advise when cancellation is effected and refund is made.
The certificate of membership issued to the bank should be
obtained, if possible, and forwarded to the Board. The State banking
authorities should be advised of the bank's proposed withdrawal from
membership and the date such withdrawal becomes effective.
It is noted that the bank expects to consolidate with a nonmember insured bank, and it is assumed that the bank understands that
withdrawal from membership and consolidation should be simultaneous in
order to avoid any lapse of deposit insurance. The usual way to handle
a situation of this kind is for the member bank not to withdraw from membership but for the non-member bank to apply for cancellation of the




3090

Diercks

Federal 1escrve Bank stock after the consolidation is effected, by
using Form 86 (Voluntary Liquidation of Member Bank) with appropriate
changes.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

3091
1
BOARD OF 3OVERNDRS
OF THE

)
4 10,4,
.
'
4C let 04SP, 4o.,
,`4,4 .-,,,-‘e,e4 -7 •

Item No, 4
10/30/57

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

,* 3

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

tw.3.

ADORERS

arriciAL

CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE HOARD

October 30, 1957

The Honorable Jesse P. Wolcott, Chairman,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Mr. Wolcott:
Reference is made to your letter of October 18,
1957, concerning the application of the American Bank and
Trust Company, Bessemer, Alabama, for continuance of deposit insurance after withdrawal from membership in the

Federal Reserve System.
No corrective programs which the Board of Governors
believes should be incorporated as conditions to the continuance of deposit insurance have been urged upon or agreed to
by the bank.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

3092
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

Item No. 5
10/30/57

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

October 31, 1957

Dear Sir:
This refers to the Board's letter of July 9, 1956, requesting that you assemble and furnish the Board certain data with respect
to the principal banks and branches located in 73 metropolitan areas
for use in connection with preparedness measures undertaken by the
Office of Defense Mobilization. The requested data, furnished on
form F. R. 175 devised for the purpose, were reviewed and edited at
the Board's offices and then given to ODM in punch-card form.
It has now been decided to expand this record of the banking structure so as to comprehend the principal banks and branches
located in all of the 174 metropolitan areas in the continental
United States. Our records indicate that on June 30, 1956 there
were 2,494 banks and 4,169 branches located in the 73 metropolitan
areas with respect to which data have already been collected, with
litan
aggregate deposits of $146 billion; in the 101 additional metropo
now desired, there were 1,046
areas with respect to which data are
banks and 774 branches, with total deposits of $22 billion.
al
It will be appreciated if you will select the princip
the 101 additional metropolitan areas
banks and branches in each of
procedure as
falling in your district, in accordance with the same
l 73 metropolitan areas. As a basis of
was followed for the origina
necessary in some
selection of branches, it doubtless will again be
Reserve Bank first to obtain from the parent
cases for the Federal
s of the head office
bank the approximate or estimated total deposit
examination report work sheets do not show the
and each branch, if
ion, it should be
deposits of each banking office. In this connect
ODM record is not intended to include all offices
emphasized that the
d as principal banking
of a given branch system; only branches regarde
respective metropolitan areas or communities are
offices in their
d on the same basis as
to be included--i.e., they should be selecte
dent banks.
if they were indepen
With respect to each selected bank and branch, please obform F. R. 175, a
tain or assemble the data called for by revised
enclosed and a supply of which is being sent you
copy of which is
covering a given metropoliunder separate cover. When the reports
completed, reviewed, and edited, please send
tan area have been




3093
-2one copy (instead of two copies as requested last year) to the Board's
Division of Bank Operations.
Form 175 has been simplified in some respects, particularly
under item 10 pertaining to the structural characteristics of bank
premises. The captions of the sub-items have been clarified in the
light of questions previously raised; in addition, definitions of
certain architectural terms have been shown on the reverse side of
the form for the guidance of Federal Reserve Banks and respondent
banks. If, in a given case, a bank occupies two or more adjacent
structures and there is some doubt how this situation should be reflected in item 10, it is suggested that the pertinent information
with respect to each structure be reported.
The report form again calls for certain data that will be
supplied in Washington, e.g., the location of the banking office in
terms of latitude and longitude called for under item 5, which will
be supplied to the Board by the Bureau of the Census on the basis
of the State, city, and street address of the given office. The revised form also has a column in the right-hand margin for convenience
in coding certain items and transcribing data to punch cards. As
indicated, this column will in part be completed at the Board's
offices.
A copy of the list and definitions of all metropolitan
areas as of January 15, 1957, published by the Bureau of the Budget,
nal
is enclosed for your use in determining which of the 101 additio
each
metropolitan areas are in your district and the description of
area.
conThe Board's letter of July 91 1956 stated that it was
date annually.
templated that the proposed record would be brought up to
been deInstead of bringing the record up to date this year, it has
areas not
cided to supplement it by including the 101 metropolitan
form, like
previously covered. This is the reason that the revised
30, 1956, rather
the original one, calls for certain data as of June
bringing the
than 1957. Consideration will be given next year to
entire record up to date.
You may be interested in the attached compilations showing
metropolitan areas.
the number of banking offices and deposits by
Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter

Enclosures.

S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

BANKS.
TO THE PRESIDENTS OF ALL FEDERAL RESERVE



3094
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No.

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
Aookr.ss

OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

October 301 1957

Comptroller of the Currency,
Treasury Department,
Washington 25, D. C.
Attention Mr. C. C. Fleming,
Assistant Chief National Bank Examiner.
Dear Mr. Comptroller:
Reference is made to a letter from your office dated
August 30, 1957, enclosing copies of an application to organize
a national bank at Grants, New Mexico, which was submitted by
Mr. Phil C. Bennett and associates, and requesting a recommendation as to whether or not the application should be approved.
Information contained in a report of investigation of
the application made by an examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank
of Kansas City indicates generally favorable findings with respect to the factors usually considered in connection with such
proposals, except that the identity and qualifications of the
proposed executive officers were not disclosed and some of the
proposed directors apparently do not meet the residential qualifications. The Board of Governors recommends approval of the
application, provided arrangements are made for management satisfactory to your office.
The Board's Division of Examinations will be glad to
discuss any aspects of this case with representatives of your
office if you SD desire.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

6

10/30/57

309

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OE THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 7

10/10/57

WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE E1OARD

October 30, 1957

Comptroller of the Currency,
Treasury Department,
Washington 25, D. C.
Attention Mr. W. M. Taylor,
Deputy Comptroller of the Currency.
Dear Mr. Comptroller:
Reference is made to a letter from your office dated August 8,
1957, enclosing copies of an application to organize a national bank at
Grants, New Mexico, signed by Mr. Sterling F. Black and associates, and
requesting a recommendation as to whether or not the application should

be approved.
A report of investigation of the application made by an examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City discloses that the
organizers agreed to provide a capital structure of e500,000 for the
bank instead of a00,000 shown on the application. This adjusted amount
of capital structure would appear to be satisfactory. It is apparent
that a need exists for additional banking facilities in the Grants community and that the prospects for profitable operation of another bank are
favorable. However, at the time of investigation of this application
only a meager effort had been made to get the capital subscribed, and
arrangements had not been made as to location of the bank or quarters to
be occupied. Furthermore, it is indicated that the proposed management
of the bank is lacking the necessary experience to handle the problems
Of a new institution in this situation. In the circumstances, the
Board of Governors does not feel justified in recommending approval of
this application.
The Board's Division of Examinations will be glad to discuss
any aspects of this case with representatives of your office if you so
desire.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

3096
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

Item No. 8

10/30/57

ACIORESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONOENCE
TO THE °GARD,

October 30, 1957

Mr. Geo. W. Sheffer, Jr., Chief Examiner,
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta,
Atlanta 3, Georgia.
Dear Mr. Sheffer:
In accordance with the request contained in
your letter of October 24, 1957, the Board approves
the designation of Jack Daniel Hardage as a special
assistant examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank of
Atlanta to participate in the examinations of State
member banks only.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.