View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1842

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Thursday, October 30, 1952. The Board
met in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Szymczak
Evans
Vardaman
Mills
Robertson
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Thomas, Economic Adviser to the Board
Young, Director, Division of Research
and Statistics
Marget, Director, Division of International Finance
Solomon, Assistant General Counsel
Hersey, Chief, Special Studies Section,
Division of International Finance
Tamagna„ Chief, Financial Operations and
Policy Section, Division of International
Finance

Mr. Marget presented a report on recent and prospective interriational gold and dollar movements.
Following a discussion based on this presentation, Messrs.
14arget, Hersey, and Tamagna withdrew and Mr. Schmidt, Chief, Business
inance and Capital Markets Section, Division of Research and Statistics,
entered the room.
Before this meeting there had been sent to each member of the
Beard a copy of a memorandum from Mr. Young dated October 24, 1952, to




1843

—2—

10/30/52

which was attached (1) a copy of a letter dated September 11, 1952,
r
addressed to Mr. Young by Mr. Victor P. Dalmas, Executive Directo
of

the

Select Committee on Small Business of the House of Representa-

tives, setting forth seven questions relating to recent trends in
commercial bank lending to small business, and (2) draft replies to

the questions prepared by the Division of Research and Statistics.
Following a discussion of the
proposed replies, they were approved
unanimously subject to minor revisions
to take into account suggestions made
at this meeting and any further suggestions which might be made by members
of the Board.
reQuestion was raised in this connection as to whether the
Plies should be transmitted over the signature of the Chairman.

During

4 discussion of this point, the view was expressed by members of the
board that no staff studies should be transmitted to Congressional comtittees without the approval of the Board, that the transmittal letter
should be signed by the Chairman, and that it should indicate in each
instance that the study had been made by the staff at the direction of

the Board.




Secretary's note: In accordance with
the above, the replies to the questions
submitted by Mr. DaImas were sent to
him under date of November 4, 1952,
with a letter signed by Chairman Martin
reading as follows:

1844

10/30/52
"I am transmitting herewith a staff study, prepared
at the Board's direction and in response to the questions
raised in your letter of September 11, dealing with various
aspects of the financing problems of small business. The
Board sincerely trusts that this study will be helpful to
the members of the House Select Committee on Small Business.
"In this connection, I should also like to call your
attention to a staff report to the Board on the subject of
The Cost and Availability of Credit and Capital to Small
Business, prepared in response to a request of the Senate
Select Committee on Small Business. This report, shortly
to be available in published form, contains additional information on some of the subjects treated in the enclosed
study."
At this point Mr. Schmidt withdrew from the meeting.
Before this meeting there had been sent to the members of
the Board copies of a memorandum dated October 22, 1952, from the
Division of Bank Operations relating to a request by the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago for authorizatLon to obtain firm bids for
the addition of four floors to the head office building and for
certain alterations to the building, the estimated cost of the addition and alterations being $4,200,858, including architect's and
engineers' fees.

There was attached to the memorandum a draft of

letter to Mr. Young, President of the Reserve Bank, reading as
follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of September 161
1952, and the detailed plans and specifications for the
proposed addition and alterations to your head office
building.
"The Board will interpose no objection to your
Bank's securing firm bids for the construction of four




10/30/52
"additional stories and for the alterations outlined, with
the understanding that the bids win be submitted to the
Board for consideration before a contract for the work is
awarded.
"It is noted that you plan to explore further the
question of additional vault facilities and will submit a
definite recommendation later."
The letter was approved unanimously.
Reference was then made to a draft of letter to Mr. Lewis,
Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, reading
as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of October 10
enclosing a copy of a letter from the Regional Enforcement Director of the Office of Price Stabilization, Kansas
City, Missouri, asking for certain information which he
believed may have been obtained by your Bank in the course
of the Regulation W investigation of Howard Stubblefield,
d.b.a. Missouri Builders and Western and S & W Distributing
Company.
"You state in your letter that your Bank would, of
course, be happy to be of assistance in any action in connection with this request that the Board considers appropriate. The Board believes that it would be appropriate for
your Bank to cooperate with the Regional Enforcement Director by making available to him any information which
your Bank now has which would be of assistance to him in
the performance of his official duties. For example, it
may be that his staff can obtain leads by looking at material
in your files or by discussing the case with personnel in
your Bank.
"It would be undesirable to have his office disclose
the source of any leads or information obtained from your
Bank. Moreover, it seems most unlikely that any information in your files or any oral testimony which could be
furnished by personnel in your Bank could be used as evidence. However, it would seem that cooperation in the




L84.6

10/3o/s2

-5-

"manner outlined above not only would be desirable but
also in all probability would serve his purposes fully."
The letter had been circulated among the members of the Board
and had been placed on the docket for consideration at this meeting
at the request of Governor Vardaman, who stated that his question
concerned the propriety of a Federal Reserve Bank dealing directly
Aith a regional office of a Government agency in a case of this kind,
as opposed to a procedure whereby any information of this character
llould be requested by the Washington office of the agency and would
be supplied through the Board.
During a discussion of this point, Mr. Solomon, in response
to a question by Chairman Martin, referred to Section 8(a) of the
ka:rdis Rules of Organization, relating to the disclosure of "unPlIblished information of the Board".

He said that the Reserve Banks

appeared to be fully aware of the requirements of this section precribing the release of such information only with the consent of the
board, that the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis had followed the pree ribed procedure in this instance, and that he felt that it would be
P170Poler to permit the Reserve Bank to allow the regional office of the
°trice of Price Stabilization to use the information to the extent
1"oribed in the draft of reply to Mr. Lewis.




Thereupon, the letter to Mr. Lewis
was approved unanimously in the form submitted.

1847

-6-

10/30/52

Governor Evans referred to the action of the Board on
September 12, 1952, approving a proposal by the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas to take an option to purchase certain property adjacent to the head office building.

He stated that this property

had now been purchased by the Bank, that there was an adjoining
Piece of property that the Reserve Bank also desired to purchase,
and that the matter of this additional purchase would be brought to
the attention of the Board within the near future.
Governor Vardaman stated that if he should be absent at the
time the matter came before the Board, he would like the record to
show that if the directors of the Dallas Bank thought that the purchase should be made and if the Board member having responsibility
for primary consideration of such matters agreed, he would favor authorng the Bank to make the purchase.

He also said that he considered

the failure of the Federal Reserve Banks in the past to acquire real
estate for possible future expansion to have been a mistake and that
in his opinion the general policy of the Board should be favorable
to such purchases.
Reference was made to Mr. Thurston's memorandum of October 13)
1952, concerning a digest of the economic and monetary situation which
tnight be sent periodically to the directors of the Federal Reserve Banks)
to the discussion of this matter at the meeting on October 20, and to




184.8
10/30/52

—7—

the understanding at that time that the matter would be considered
further by the Board after the sample copy of the digest which was
attached to Mr. Thurston's memorandum had been circulated to all of
the members of the Board.
Mr. Thurston stated that, if agreeable to the Board, he would
Prefer to postpone discussion of this matter until he had had an opPortunity to complete the revision of the statement of dutias and
responsibilities which is sent to newly-appointed Reserve Bank head
°face directors and until he had considered further the various
Possibilities for establishing closer relations between the Board and

the directors.
Governor Mills referred to the Retail Credit Survey published
lirlually by

the Board on the basis of information collected by the

?ederal Reserve Banks.

He said that the Division of Research and

Statistics had not been thoroughly satisfied as to the accuracy or
coverage of the surveys, that the Reserve Banks shared these misgivings,
141 that there was now a possibility that the information could be collected by the Bureau of the Census through an expansion of that Bureau's
8

ey of retail business which was instituted last year, the Bureau
,
111"

having indicated that it would be willing to expand the scope of its
kisting questionnaire to procure the data desired by the Board, pro//1-C[ed the Board would reimburse it to the extent of approximately $10,000




10/30/52
a year.

-8Governor Mills added that the Division of Research and

Statistics believed that the accuray of the consumer credit statistics
would be improved by this change in procedure and that, if the Board
alV/vved the proposal, the Bureau of the Census would make plans for
allgmenting its forthcoming survey in the manner outlined, provided
it Was advised of the Boardts decision by the first of November.
He then called upon Mr. Young, who discussed the survey of
sOIA3 28,000 business enterprises instituted last year by the Bureau
Of the Census to supplement the information obtained in its Censuses
of Business, which are conducted only at intervals of three years or
1°I1ger and which have served heretofore as a benchmark for the Boards
e°risumer credit statistics.

Mr. Young pointed out that the proposed

13170cedure mould eliminate one Government report going to the same

bilainess firms to a considerable extent and that there would be a
811bstantia1 saving to the System as a whole, taking into account the
e)CPC111SeS of the Reserve Banks in making the annual Retail Credit Sur-

He estimated the total cost of these surveys to the System at
'Ill'haps $35,000, including expense to the Board of about $4,000.
Mr. Young explained that the urgency of the matter grew out

°r the fact that if the change in procedure was to be made, negotiations
'41-th the Bureau of the Census




would have to be undertaken at once in

1850

10/30/52

-9-

order to enable the Bureau to schedule the work by the first of
November.
In response to questions by Governor Szymczak, Mr. Young
said that the Division of Research and Statistics had received telegrams from all of the Federal Reserve Banks indicating their approval
of the proposal and that under the contemplated procedure, the agreement with the Bureau of the Census would be renewed annually.

He

also said that if the Board approved the arrangement, provision would
be made in the annual budgets of the Division of Research and Statistics
or future years for the cost involved.
Following further discussion,
the proposal outlined by Governor
Mills and Mr. Young was approved
unanimously, with the understanding that no provision had been made
in the 1952 budget of the Division
of Research and Statistics or in preparing the 1953 budget of that Division for the payments to the Bureau
of the Census.
At this point all of the members of the staff except Messrs.
CarPoenter, Sherman,and Kenyon withdraw from the meeting and the follow-s additional actions were taken by the Board;
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
?ederal Reserve System on October 29, 1952, were approved unanimously.




1851

10/30/52

-10-

Letter to the Board of Directors, Fidelity-Philadelphia
Trust Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, reading as follows:
"Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, the Board of
Governors approves the establishment and operation
of a branch of your bank at Washington Lane and
Ogontz Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, upon
condition that final formal approval is first obtained from the appropriate State authorities and
the branch is established within twelve months after
the date of this letter."
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Letter to Mr. Stetzelberger, Vice President, Federal Reserve
Bank of Cleveland, reading as follows:
"Referring to your letter and recommendation of
October 20, 1952, the Board of Governors extends until
November 6, 1953, the time within which The Cleveland
Trust Company, Cleveland, Ohio, may establish a branch
near the corner of West 210th Street and Center Ridge
Road, in either Rocky River or Fairview Park, Ohio,
as approved by the Board under date of November 6,

1951."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Board of Directors, Wachovia Bank and Trust
Company, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, reading as follows:
"Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, the Board of Governors
approves the establishment and operation of a branch at
the intersection of Patterson and Glenn Avenues, WinstonSalem, North Carolina, provided such branch is established
within six months from the date of this letter.




1852

10/30/52

-11-

"In accordance with your further request the Board
of Governors approves the establishment of a branch in
the Perkins and Newman Warehouse located on Twentyfifth Street, and a branch in Cook's Warehouse located
on Patterson Avenue Extension, both within the city
limits of Winston-Salem, both branches to be operated
during the current tobacco marketing season covering
the approximate period September through December,
inclusive. The Board also approves re-establishment
of such branches during each succeeding tobacco marketing
season covering the same period, subject to cancellation
of such approval by the Board upon reasonable notice to
the bank prior to the beginning of such period in any
year."
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Richmond, with a
letter to the Reserve Bank stating
that the Board's approval was given
subject to the formal approval of
each branch by appropriate State
authorities.
Letter to The American National Bank of Kalamazoo, Kalamazoo,
kchigan, reading as follows:
"The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System has given consideration to your application for
fiduciary powers, and grants you authority to act, when
not in contravention of State or local law, as trustee,
executor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds,
guardian of estates, assignee, receiver, committee of
estates of lunatics, or in any other fiduciary capacity
in which State banks, trust companies or other corporations which come into competition with national banks
are permitted to act under the laws of the State of
Michigan, the exercise of all such rights to be subject
to the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and the
regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System.




1853

-12"This letter will be your authority to exercise
the fiduciary powers granted by the Board pending the
preparation of a formal certificate covering such
authorization, which will be forwarded to you in due
course."
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago.
Letter to Mr. Robert M. Repp, Jr., Vice President, Mellon
National Bank and Trust Company, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, reading
aS follows:

"This refers to your letter of October 3, 1952, requesting advice as to whether the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System has any objection to the destruction, after five years, of minutes of the trust committee of the board of directors, minutes of the trust
investment committee and trust administrative committee,
and minutes of the senior committee of the trust department, provided copies of such minutes are preserved on
microfilm.
"Although different language is used in subsections
6(b) and (c) of Regulation F which provide, respectively,
that board or committee action shall be recorded in the
minutes and that the committee shall keep minutes of all
its meetings, no difference was intended in the requirement that a satisfactory record of considerations and
actions pertaining to trust activities be provided; the
word 'keep' being employed as synonymous with 'prepare'
or 'record' rather than 'retain'. It was expected, of
course, that the bank would preserve minutes of board
or committee actions for an indefinite period, but no
requirement as to the form in which such minutes should
be retained was intended. Therefore, if your bank, upon
advice of counsel, has reached the conclusion that minutes
preserved through the microfilm process are sufficient to
protect the bank and will be r,ccepted as satisfactory
secondary evidence by the courts, the Board sees no objection to your bank following the procedure outlined




1854

-13-

10/30/52
"in your letter."




Approved unanimously, with
a copy to Mr. Gidney, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.