View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

C"N Ct 4r:p

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Reserve System on Tuesday, October 3, 1950.
PREsENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

McCabe, Chairman
Szymczak
Evans
Vardaman
Norton
Powell
Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary

mmr.a.3.

14
17Utes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
"erve System on October 2, 1950, were approved unanimously.
4
eril0reliclum dated September 28, 1950, from Mr. Young, Director

:
tlie3)4181011 of Research and Statistics, recommending that the
14°4"1151111 of Mrs. Charlotte T. Breckenridge, a clerk in that Division,

llecoAted to
be effective, in accordance with her request, at the
'14ee or blIsiness
September 291 1950.
Approved unanimously.
tut

4en6um dated October 2, 1950, from G. L. Boothe, II,

4

4J1rector of the Division of Administrative Services,

Nktla

4 that the resignation of Mrs. Wanda H. Thompson, key-

r
°- in
0 that Division, be accepted to be effective, in
ilea:tee 1,1
1950.
ith her request, at the close of business September 28,

Approved unanimously.
ketn401
''-e-adum dated September 29, 1950, from G. L. Boothe, II,
etttilt
il'eet°r of the Division of Administrative Services,




1q3/50
-2reco

ell6Ling that the temporary appointment of Rudolph Reece, a
loorer
ktober
kteor

illthat Division, be extended on a permanent basis, effective
I, 1950, with no change in his present basic salary at the
$2,120 per
annum.
Approved unanimously.

14emorandum dated September 30, 1950, from Mr. Leonard,
bitect
t
°- °f the
Division of Bank Operations, recommending that the
tekk)re,
17'glIdefinite appointment of Mrs. Frances L. Franklin, a

q414st
leea clerk in
that Division, be extended on a permanent basis,
k(I that h
-er salary be increased from $2,650 to $2,730 per annum,
vctober 15, 1950.
Approved unanimously.

re

kenloranda from the heads of the divisions indicated below
eric114

t§1

izicreases in the basic annual salaries of the following

1):
4
;
3 48

those

divisions, effective October 15, 1950:

ker401°1:1, bate or
(A1) 4t/trirci, , Name
q011
lib, el.4-tviitivE RVICES
t.7„,
3 1950
11
ItAI%E. b4e1.
orsey.
ataela

,t tee ites
icur
444414
R lieading
'
0
10
11118ontz

441'114e G'ilagher




Title

Supvr. Proc. Sec.
Printing Clerk
Publications Clerk
Pay Roll Clerk
Operator (Key Punch)
Page
Cafeteria Helper

Salary Increase
To
From

$4,o75
3,825
3,600
3,350
2,650
2,280
2,190

$4,200
3,950
3,725
3,475
2,730
2,360
2,260

O/3/
50

-3tioision,
Date of
,ketto
Nat
Naze
OPERATIoNS
8eAteraber
aoilla
30,
1950
J.
BurleyLoretta 14.
Goheen
Rite. S.
Jo114 14. Boyer
krgaretpoutdstone
Dorothy Griset
CEtri 14. Werner
kirEar skituier
et C.
Gough

Title

Analyst
Supvr., F. R. Bank
Statement Unit
Statistical Asst.
Settlement Clerk
Clerk-Stenographer
Clerk-Stenographer
Clerk
Clerk-Stenographer

Salary Increase
From
To

$5,100
4,325

$5,225
4,450

3,950
3,825
3,475
3,475
2,970
2,650

4,075
3,950
3,600
3,600
3,050
2,730

Approved unanimously.
Letter
the

Fecieraa

to Mr. Lunding, Chairman and Federal Reserve Agent of

Reserve Bank of Chicago, reading as follows:
114,.;i4 accordance with the request contained in
llootieel
"8 letter
the
1950- °f Governors of September 29, 1950,
approves, effective October 9,
PettL:the PaYment of salary to Mr. August J.
Detr,2 Federal Reserve Agent's Representative,
it B
ranch, at the rate of $5,700 per annum.

4 ve

Approved unanimously.
Letter 4._
Mr. Stetzelberger, Vice President of the Federal
telik 'v
Of Cleveland, reading as
follows:

httx,
'yield of the recommendation contained in
QI5ve J-etter
of September 27, 1950, the Board of
titezlIors
further extends to May 16, 1951, the
which 'The Elyria Savings & Trust
branch
3-Yria, Ohio may establish the
der
Attte °
,;
1 ,take, Ohio
as approved by the Board under
november 16, 1949."




Approved unanimously.

1O/3/50
-4Letter to Mr. Langum, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
4111t#
o Chicago, reading as follows:
'
ckri
:
The expansion in borrowing in margin accounts
b5, -4.16 the last
year or so has not been accompanied
or,
c°rresPonding increases in loans for purchasing
de,ZrYing securities to others than brokers and
be-a
"rs at weekly reporting member banks. This may
1)4: to actual differences in credit activities,
i;er,e is some concern as to whether it might
854 -4used at least in part by the incorrect
111141;74-tication of some of these loans. The attached
-re11141-1m discusses the question in some detail.
iliqu "It
would be appreciated if you would make
the
(
01).1i1L111:: Ia
a
following banks to try to determine
have been any significant amount
1)11reitadvertent misclassification of loans for •
is atmsing or carrying securities, or (2) if there
kay 1;11,1"ge volume of loans, the proceeds of which
4ellal..
:e been used for purchasing or carrying
illfor;les, but are otherwise classified because
Act In:t i°11 available at the reporting bank does
'--411lit
definite determination of the purpose:
Chicago National Bank
Harris Trust and Savings Bank
Lake Shore National Bank
Merchandise National Bank of Chicago
"T, Northern
Trust Company
44
1118 group of bpylks, all located in Chicago,
beI
ected partly for your convenience in
recillestZlese inquiries. Similar inquiries are being
4re al,
in two other Reserve Bank cities. If there
4Eitist
7 °ther banks that you feel might be more
/1,1thbae.ie
.Lt°rY for this purpose, feel free to substitute
'"e list or expand it as seems necessary to
"14 sat
isfactory explanation.
thet t the examiners are at any State member bank
4Birkight
ble shed light on the matter, it might be
to ask them to look briefly into the
Copy of this letter has been sent to

tez




:
197

1q3/50
Approved unAnimously, with the
understanding that similar letters
would be sent to the Federal Reserve
Banks of Philadelphia and St. Louis.
Letter to the Presidents of all Federal Reserve
Banks,
reat
ng as
follows:
re, "In connection with the administration of the
cle'/fltlY instituted V-loan program for guaranteeing
se„nse production loans, the Board's telegram of
civ‘eraber 26
stated that procedures will follow as
tZlY as possible the same procedures which were
80 evIged during the V-loan
program of World War II.
IZ questions have arisen as to the extent to which
procedures and forms utilized during the previous
gra41 are
applicable to the new program.
esseh
:
Iri general, it is believed that most of the
Var7;141 Procedures established during the viorld
pres-;:iy-loan program can be followed under the
Program with only a few necessary changes.
ohal,"°110stantially the same information should be
connection with applications for guarantees
cluctIs required for guarantees of loans for war
prok)ce_cillring the previous program. Likewise,
Vith
1 instructions issued during World War II
4ree;:sPect to the number of copies of the guarantee
(1.111;
to be executed, submission of communications
-te, and similar matters should be equally
pltrs vrlate Ii
,
the processing of guarantees authorized
tli4vos
tio the Defense Production Act and the PresiNi t -4ceoutive
Order No. 10161. It is assumed that
43.11 has available copies of such procedural
rittiorle.
ZIZIe
, i;111)
%nrderstand, of course, that in certain
procedures will necessarily differ
ttezipin°se
followed during the previous program. For
aluaranteeing agencies have not delegated
lotiheeFetdhe:
Reserve Banks authority to approve
sallteez
b'
uP to a specified amount without submission
goto.dHcations to Washington, as was the case during
the br4e'r
Also, all determinations as to whether
ective borrower's operations are in fact
e
441 e'r/ to
expedite defense production so as to
for a guaranteed loan will be made by the

L




10/3/50

-6glaaranteeing agencies in Washington, at least for
.itIllePresent. For this purpose, as stated in the
t:k1116 telegram
of September 26, a copy of each
141)lication should be forwarded immediately to the
jukr(i for
agetcy. transmittal to the appropriate guaranteeing
"It is
recognized that as the program develops
ti°ns of procedure will arise which may not be
covered by procedural instructions issued
ci;r1t.g. the
V-loan program of World War II. Any such
sZi°n8 should be referred to the Board for conand determination after consultation
- n,
4he several guaranteeing agencies.
?ea zor reference purposes and in order that the
Nreral Reserve Banks and the guaranteeing agencies
Pro:
2
18 11tain complete files with respect to the
?sal,"°14a, all letters addressed by the Board to the
esdl-,!al Reserve Banks which relate to general procopi7a8 and policies
will bear an identifying V-number.
okres of such letters will be furnished to the
MaiZliiteeing agencies for their information. In
illter;°12) alokY such letters which are of general
such as interpretations of the form of
to t'inLee agreement,
may be furnished by your Bank
liAoh 4
-74cing institutions having guaranteed loans
request."

e

Approved unanimously.

etN

Lette
r to Honorable Preston Delano, Comptroller of the

hey) u
neshington 25, D. C., reading as follows:
rrn_
ptera,“11$

refers to Mr. Robertson's letter of
the op
-ioij 1 2 1950, in which it was stated that in
„,
15r
.,°1)0 a-,
r1412r1
Office loans guaranteed on the
`4J-ttecie";form of V-Loan Guarantee Agreement sub1,(
,s"
1° You with the Board's letter of September
would come within the purview of Exception
1.t eti°n 5200 of the Revised Statutes and thet
;',1
"orript,";°4 of the term 'unconditional' issued by
er of
the Currency on June 18, 1942.
SePtember 26, 1950, the Board of Governor
gletit the Federal Reserve Banks by telegram of the
Uti°4 of a new V-loan program for guaranteeing

of your




1O/3/50
-7:lerenSe production
loans pursuant to the Defense

j°duc
j

tion Act of 1050 and the President's Execuve Order
No. 10161. Among other steps taken in
connection,
the Board, after consulting the
_
562arattee4lag
agencies, prescribed the form of
Zliar,Tea
agreement to be used in connection with
IZ,72-14 Program; and a printed copy of that form
eillj
"
i ified as 'Form of September 27, 1950' is
1/;4)sel. This form is identical with that which
2e
6 ellelosed with the Board's letter of September
eZcept for
three minor changes as described
e Board's
telegram to the Federal Reserve
of that telegram is enclosed.
or 8'
" Aiscopy
teirIt
assumed that the changes in the form
/v:antee agreement indicated in the enclosed
the
:
84 will not affect the unconditionality of
corltrararitee agreement. However, we will appreciate
thEvt-1
;:!:ation by your Office of our understanding
SepteZ11118 guaranteed on the prescribed form of
"
Z;ver 27/ 1950) will come within the purview
StEtt;?.elption 10 to Section 5200 of the Revised
tiota
::" and the definition of the term 'uncondi43 as used
therein.
are
°I. Your information in this connection, there
ieEller enclosed a copy of the press statement
or the
h respect to the new program and a copy
SerYt
- etabe ard's Regulation V as revised effective
r 27, 1950."

tal:

Approved unanimously.
tetter to
Honorable Jere Cooper, House of Representatives,

-11 ,04,

-* C.) reading as follows:
kre res

requested in your letter of September 21, we
h14 Vrit
'j
lL laing Mr. Henry A. Fowlkes' letter of September
?ersim,711 ort behalf of the Meriwether Furniture Company,
'tlbject—g, Tennessee, of which he is president, on the
"Iirc)r
,
this Board's consumer credit Regulation W.
'rowlkes suggests that down payment requirements
should
4 set l'"ure under the provisions of Regulation W
, as '4'1 1/
''"--113 per cent of the cash price instead of
c)st cerlt as the
regulation now requires on articles
4 $100 or
more. He also appears to be under the




1.400

14V3/50
-88."1111Preesion that during the war Regulation W required
°Ile-third
down payment on furniture as it did on
414°140hiles.
le a:
1111e re,7-ulation has generally required something
thEL
'
fl the way of minimum down Payments on furniture
zi.1-4011 other listed articles, particularly
automobiles.
10e11111mum down payment for furniture has ranged from
to i7 cent in 1941 to 20 per cent in 1942, then down
ero-;::, 13ft" cent in 1949 and when the last regulation
in June of 1949 a 10 per cent minimum down
t10---rit vas required. All during that period the
iettn#PaYllient requirement of automobiles has been at
-" °Ile-third of the cash price.
lieu:It has seemed to the Board that there are good
pethi—Ae for
permitting in Regulation W a minimum down
:
to illt for furniture different from that applicable
kri;ornobiles
d some other listed articles. The
Eteso
:
t
i llre trade in expressions through its national
--,e.tion seems to support that view and, incidentally,
tive-literences we had with the association representa1 1,,,hey appeared somewhat apprehensive that the
reetr;'°Ils of the regulation might be made more
Ot!
tive for furniture than those that were adopted.
vouzi'se) there is nothing in the regulation which
P
,!!vent any merchant from requiring a higher
re 4.'llnent than the minimum established in the
ation.
pronTlie Board is constantly studying conditions and
Vheilev
-Pared to change the terms of Regulation W
48 thoe
„
r it aPpears appropriate to do so. Views such
ezPressed by Mr. Fowlkes are considered in
tor
4 with changes in terms, and. we thank you
his letter to our attention."
Approved lIngnimously.
oor

Letter to Mr. C. N. Nichols, Managing Director, Northeastern

tktic4vt

"°11i. and Insulating Contractors Association, Inc., 12
Street, New York 17, N. Y., reading as follows:

t

atil,Ne refers to
your letter of September 21, 1950 and
September 25, 1970, to Chairman McCabe reIlegUlation W.




I401

-9"You refer to the business advisory committees
grovided for in
section 701 (b)(ii) of the Defense
Production Act of 1950, and you state that your
:,tion requests that the Board 'permit it to
- ablish
such an advisory committee'.
to A "As you know, the Board goes to great lengths
ti '441sult with
the persons affected by its regula:
s. This is
true of all the regulations for which
14,-!
°a-rd }las responsibility, including Regulation
'
ola will recall that the practice
was followed
but °
..1
,
11Y with the present version of Regulation W
The
;
-180 with the versions issued in earlier
years.
EtEsn
-e Igas consultation with representatives of
your
the-,
el tion as well as with the representatives of
the -c11,1r other
industries and groups affected by
colls,Zhe Board has every intention of continuing to
vhers'" with
those affected by its regulations
Pilla717
,
e!: it is practicable and consistent with the
the
u.nterest. The Board will follow this policy in
coztv"
1. 4tUre, as
in the Past, because the Board is
%levy!
t ced that it is the fairest and most effective
ad
minister a regulation.
ror 1"13UsinesEi
advisory committees of the kind provided
Act m section
701 (b)(ii) of the Defense Production
gIn some
corisicases be appropriate for purposes of
clear "4ti0n in
connection with Regulation W. It is
thel3, however,
that it would not be appropriate for
,°411 to
select a particular trade association
SectiZrait it to establish
such an advisory committee'.
(b)(ii) specifically states that in the
:he te;°!,1 of the advisory committees provided for by
%
I'011. 'there shall be fair representation for
N;e111—
'
elit small, for medium, and for large business
4s0cirl.Tes, for different geographical areas, for trade
:14erla
t.t.t°11 members and nonmembers, and for different
Hos of the
industry ....'
11, the ;
ellsions will doubtless arise from time to time
;11ture, as in •the past, when the Board will be
teD
,ardi 0 Consultsubject
with persons
to Regulation W
11z
enanges in the regulation. As stated in
'lQ
to t 0ri
f09 Of the Defense Production Act, such conthe
sometimes be 'impracticable or contrary
'erest of the national
defense.'

'
3.01,t7 7°1




-104711L

Board has long recognized the benefits to be
11h4:-Lved from
consulting wherever appropriate with those
are subject to its regulations. Such consultation
course, relieve the Board of its duty to
decisions that will give proper weight to the
byllerel Public interest -- which is rarely represented
111:V organized group. But it can be helpful in
tanding the particular problems and viewpoints
1fferent segments of various industries.
veicf,2°11 may be sure that the Board at all times
illtere8 the views of your association, and of all other
the,
e8ted Persons, with respect to any matter on which
41.°81Lrd has responsibility."

Z

Approved unanimously.
Telegram to all Federal Reserve Banks and their branches,
"f011ows

wire being sent to all Federal Reserve Banks
branches to give preliminary confidential
4tZi;7 011 regarding issuance of Regulation X, Real
is‘74 ;1‘edit.
Expected that Regulation X will be
m1,1:; this
week to be effective promptly. We will
14e 13;
1,Y°11 as soon as we have more definite information.
or41-e-- to airmail
photo offset negatives to your head
c;„184 soon as available so that regulation may be
end distributed promptly to interested persons
D08-8--r di
re,ible strict. We will also wire to you as soon as
text of press release which will be issued
etre41-.
! 4 regUlation. We will advise you later of
to 11-;4:ve date
and when regulation will be released
'
41rell
'
lle. Please keep information contained in this
cotridential until that time."
illtzeslr

Approved unanimously.
Me
torardum dated October 2, 1950, from Mr. Hooff, Assistant
ti, re
c°131Mending that there be published in the law department
Oct b
tiA
er issue of the Federal Reserve Bulletin statements in
tott
4ttached to
the memorandum with respect to the following:




t 403

1v3/50
-11Delegation
of Functions under Defense Production Act
Executive Order No. 10161
Loan
Guarantees for Defense Production
Regulation V
ectsumer Credit
Pre-effective Date Transactions (S-1139)
Calculation of Maturity for Improvement
Credit (S-1141)
Construction of or Repairs to Detached
Structures (S-1142)
Rome Improvement "materials and articles"
(S-1143)
Purchase or Discount of Credits Extended
Pursuant to Pre-effective Date Commitment
(S-1144)
Automobile Appraisal Guides
l'ecleral Deposit Insurance Act




Approved unanimously.

040

1r'

i
A. I
"_.

i
Secretary.