View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

2249
A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System was held in Washington on Tuesday, November 5, 1935, at 11:30
a. m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Hamlin
Miller
James
Szymczak

Mr. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Morrill reported that the Comptroller of the Currency today issued a call on all national banks for reports
of condition as
at the close of business on November
1, 1935, and that, in accordance
With the usual practice, a call was made on behalf of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System on all State member banks for
reports of condition as of the same date.
The call made on behalf of the Board was
unanimously approved.
The Board then acted upon the following matters:
Letters to Mr. Strater, Secretary of the Federal Reserve Bank
of Cleveland, Mr. Stevens, Chairman
of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago, and to Mr. Walsh, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas, stating respectively that the Board approves the establishment
Without change by the Cleveland and Chicago banks on November 1, and
by the Dallas
bank on November 2, 1965, of the rates of discount and
Purchase in their existing schedules.




Approved unanimously.

14#4•,..)

11/5/35

-2Memorandum dated November 2, 1935, from Mr. Wyatt, General

Counsel, recommending the temporary appointment of Miss Avelyn Buchanan
as a stenographer in the legal division for the period ending December
31, 1935, with salary at the rate of 0130 per month, effective as of
the date upon which she enters upon the performance of her duties.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Governor Seay of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, reading as follows:
"Referring to Mr. Johnstone's letter of October 24,
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approves
the temporary assignment of Mrs. Emma B. Roberts to the
position of Assorter-Typist, Fiscal Agency Department, at
an annual salary of 01500, which is $240 in excess of the
salary range provided for this position, for a period of
six months beginning November 1, 1935.
"With reference to Mr. Johnstone's inquiry as to whether
the Board's approval should be obtained before temporarily
assigning Mr. J. Raymond Heeke to the position of General
Clerk, Transit Department, at an annual salary of 01860
which is $60 in excess of the salary range provided for that
Position, the Board is of the opinion that, inasmuch as Mr.
Heeke has been working since May 1, 1955 in a position calling for a lower salary than he is paid, his temporary assignment to the above-mentioned position should have the Board's
approval, which is hereby given for a period of six months
beginning November 10 1935."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Governor Martin of the Federal Reserve Bank of St.
Louis, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to Mr. Attebery's letter of October
21, requesting the approval of the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System of the temporary assignment of
Mr. A. K. Summers to the position of Clerk and Recorder,
Custody Department, Louisville Branch, at an annual salary




2251
11/5/35

-3-

"of 0,500, which is $1,600 in excess of the salary
range
provided for that position.
"In view of the circumstances outlined in Mr. Attebery's
letter, the Board approves the temporary assignment of
Mr.
Summers to the above-mentioned position, without reduct
ion
in salary, for the 12 month period ending
March 28, 1936."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserv
e
Bank of New York, reading
as follows:
"In connection with its consideration of the application of 'Inter-County Title Guaranty and Mortgage Compan
y',
Floral Park, New York, for a voting permit entitling such
corporation to vote the stock which it owns or controls of
the 'Floral Park Bank', Floral Park, New York, the Board
has determined that such applicant is not engaged, direct
ly
or indirectly, as a business in holding the stock
of, or
managing or controlling, banks, banking associations,
savings banks, or trust companies, within the meaning of
section 2(c) of the Banking Act of 1935, as amended by section 301 of the Banking Act of 1935, and that, accordingly,
the applicant is not a holding company affiliate for any
purposes other than those of section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act.
"Inclosed herewith is a letter to the applicant advising it concerning the Board's action in this matter.
If, for any reason, you believe that this matter should
be
reconsidered by the Board, please communicate with the
Board at once. Otherwise, you are requested to transmit
the inclosed letter to the applicant. A copy of the letter
is also inclosed for your files.
"As you will note, the Board expressly reserves the
right to make a further determination of this matter at
any time on the basis of the then existing facts. In this
connection, it is requested that you advise the Board if, at
any time, you believe this matter should again be considered
by the Board."
Approved unanimously, together with
a letter to the "Inter-County Title
Guaranty and Mortgage Company", Floral
Park, New York, reading as follows:
"This refers to the application of your corporation for




2252
11/s/35

-4-

'a voting permit entitling it to vote the stock which
it
owns or controls of the 'Floral Park Bank', Floral Park,
New York.
"The Board understands that your corporation was organized and is operated for the purpose of conducting a
title guaranty and mortgage loan business; that the principal assets of the corporation consist of mortgages and
the title plant; that the investment of your corporation
in the stock of the Floral Park Bank was incidental to
its
principal business; and that the investment in the stock
of such bank constitutes a relatively small portion
of your
total assets. It is also understood that your corporation
does not hold stock of, or manage or control, any bank other
than the Floral Park Bank and that your corporation was not
organized and is not operated for the purpose of managing
or controlling banks.
"As you perhaps know, section 501 of the Banking Act
of 1935 amended section 2(c) of the Banking Act of 1933,
defining the term 'holding company affiliate', by adding
thereto the following paragraph:
'Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "holding company affiliate" shall not include (except
for the purposes of section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended) any corporation all of the
stock of which is owned by the United States, or
any organization which is determined by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System not to be engaged, directly or indirectly, as a business in holding the stock of, or managing or controlling, banks,
banking associations, savings banks, or trust companies.'
"In view of the above facts, the Board has determined
that your corporation is not engaged, directly or indirectly,
as a business in holding the stock of, or managing or controlling, banks, banking associations, savings banks, or
trust companies, within the meaning of the above quoted
statutory provision, and, therefore, is not a holding company affiliate for any purposes other than those of section
23A of the Federal Reserve Act. Accordingly, it is not
necessary for your corporation to obtain a voting permit in
order to vote the stock which it owns or controls of the
Floral Park Bank and on this basis the Board will give no
further consideration to your application for sucn a permit.
"If, however, your corporation acquires control over
any other bank, or the character of the business of your corporation, the nature of its assets, or the purpose for which
it is operated should at any time differ from the description




2253
11/5/3s

-5-

"thereof contained in this letter to an extent which would
indicate that it might be engaged as a business in holding
the stock of, or managing or controlling, banks, this
matter should again be submitted to the Board for its determination. The Board reserves the right to make a further
determination of this matter at any time on the basis of the
then existing facts."
Letter to Mr. Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, reading as follows:
"In connection with its consideration of the application of 'Realty & Security Co.', Passaic, New Jersey, for a
voting permit entitling it to vote the stock which it owns
or controls of the 'People's Bank and Trust Company',
Passaic, New Jersey, the Board has determined that the applicant is not engaged, directly or indirectly, as a business in holding the stock of, or managing or controlling,
banks, banking associations, savings banks, or trust companies
within the meaning of section 2(c) of the Banking Act of
1933, as amended by section 501 of the Banking Act of 1935,
and, accordingly, the applicant is not a holding company
affiliate for any purposes other than those of section 23A
of the Federal Reserve Act.
"Inclosed herewith is a letter to the applicant advising it concerning the Board's action in this matter. If,
for any reason, you believe that this matter should be reconsidered by the Board, please communicate with the Board
at once. Otherwise, you are requested to transmit the inclosed letter to the applicant. A copy of the letter is
also inclosed for your files.
"As you will note, the Board expressly reserves the
right to make a further determination of this matter at any
time on the basis of the then existing facts. In this connection it is requested that you advise the Board if, at any
time, you believe this matter should again be considered
by it."
Approved unanimously, together with
a letter to "Realty & Security Company",
Passaic, New Jersey, reading as follows:
"This refers to the application of your company for a
voting permit entitling it to vote the stock which it owns
or controls in the 'People's Bank and Trust Company', Passaic,




2254
11/5/35

-6--

"New Jersey.
"The Board understands that your company was organized
in 1930 for the purpose of dealing in securities; that
prior to May, 1934, your company was the wholly owned subsidiary of the People's Bank and Trust Company and owned the
bank building and other real estate; that as a means of reorganizing the bank, which had been operating on a restricted basis since 1933, your company was used as a medium of
effecting such plan; that all of the capital stock of the
bank was canceled and a likt amount, except directors' qualifying shares, issued to your company; that your company
issued a like amount of its stock to the former stockholders
of the bank; that the unsecured depositors of the bank who
waived a portion of their claims received in exchange the
equivalent in par value of preferred stock of your company
and that all of the preferred stock of your company is held
by such depositors; that your company in turn received certain assets of the bank of a book value of approximately the
amount of preferred stock so issued; that these assets, including the stock of the People's Bank and Trust Company owned
by your company, are pledged to the Reconstruction Finance
Corporation for a loan, the proceeds of which were contributed
to the bank; that the common stock of your company has no
voting power and the holders thereof receive no dividends until your preferred stock is paid or retired; that the bank
Is the only subsidiary of your company; that your company
owns all the stock of the People's Bank and Trust Company; except directors qualifying shares, but does not own or control
any other bank stock; that the activities of your company are
confined chiefly to the liquidation of the assets of the old
bank; and that your company was not organized and is not now
operated for the purpose of managing or controlling the
People's Bank and Trust Company and does not hold the stock
of that bank for such purpose.
"As you perhaps know, section 301 of the Banking Act
of 1935 amended section 2(c) of the Banking Act of 1953,
defining the term holding company affiliate, by adding thereto the following paragraph:
'Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "holding company affiliate" shall not include (except for
the purposes of section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act, as amended) any corporhtion all of the stock of
which is owned by the United States, or any organization which is determined by the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System not to be engaged, directly or indirectly, as a business in holding the stock
of, or managing or controlling, banks, banking associations, savings banks, or trust companies.'




2255
11/5/35

-7-

'In view of the above facts, the Board has determined
that your company is not engaged, directly or indirectly,
as a business in holding the stock of, or managing or controlling, banks, banking associations, savings barks, or
trust companies, within the meaning of the above quoted
statutory provisions, and, therefore, it is not a holding
company affiliate for any purposes other than those of section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. Accordingly, it is
not necessary for your company to obtain a voting permit in
order to vote the stock which it owns or controls of the
People's Bank and Trust Company, and, on this basis, the
Board will give no further consideration to your application for such a permit.
"If, however, your company acquires control over any
other bank, or the purpose for which your company operates,
the purpose for which it holds the stock of the subsidiary
bank, the nature of its assets, or the character of the
functions which it performs should at any time differ from
the description thereof contained in this letter to an extent which would indicate that it might be engaged as a
business in holding the stock of, or managing or controlling,
banks, this matter should again be submitted to the Board
for its determination. The Board reserves the right to make
a further determination of this matter at any time on the
basis of the then existing facts."
Letter to Mr. Hoxton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
Bank of Richmond, reading as follows:
connection with its consideration of the application
of 'Williamson Mining & Manufacturing Company', Williamson,
West Virginia, for a voting permit entitling such corporation to vote the stock which it owns or controls of 'The
First National Bank of Williamson', Williamson, West Virginia,
the Board has determined that such applicant is not engaged, directly or indirectly, as a business in holding the
stock of, or managing or controlling, banks, banking associations, savings banks, or trust companies, within the meaning of section 2(c) of the Banking Act of 19330 as amended
by section 301 of the Banking Act of 1935, and that, accordingly, the applicant is not a holding company affiliate for
any purposes other than those of section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act.
"Inclosed herewith is a letter to the applicant advising it concerning the Board's action in this matter. If,
for any reason, you believe that this matter should be reconsidered by the Board, please communicate with the Board
at once. Otherwise, you are requested to transmit the inclosed letter to the applicant. A copy of the letter is



2256
11/5/3s

-8-

"also inclosed for your files.
"As you will note, the Board expressly reserves the
right to make a further determination of this matter at
any time on the basis of the then existing facts. In this
connection, it is requested that you advise the Board if, at
any time, you believe this matter should again be considered
by the Board."
Approved unanimously, together with
a letter to the "Williamson Mining & Manufacturing Company", Williamson, West Virginia, reading as follows:
"This refers to the application of your corporation for
a voting permit entitling it to vote the stock which it owns
or controls of 'The First National Bank of Williamson',
Williamson, West Virginia.
"The Board understands that your corporation was originally organized for the purpose of conducting the business
of mining and selling coal, manufacturing furniture, lumber,
coke, iron, glass, leather, and other products, and laying
off a town and disposing of lots, and that the principal
business of the corporation has been the purchase, sale and
management of coal mining properties. It is understood that
the principal asset of the corporation is unimproved real
estate and the coal which underlies it. It is further understood that your corporation's investment in the stock of
The First National Bank of Williamson was incidental to its
principal business. It is also understood that the investment in the preferred stock of the corporation was made for
the purpose of rehabilitating the capital structure of such
bank in order to provide adequate banking facilities in the
City in which the business of the corporation and its related interests is centered.
"It is noted that the balance sheet of your corporation
as of March 15, 1965, showed that the corporation had assets
classified as follows:
Accounts Receivable
$ 17 751 03
36 800 84
Bills Receivable
218 100 00
Investments
522 491 60
Real Estate
157 970 00
Coal (Not yet mined)
"It is understood that your investment in the stock of
The First National Bank of Williamson consists of all of the
2,000 outstanding shares of preferred stock and 80 of the
500 outstanding shares of common stock of the bank, all of
which stock has a par value of 100 per share. It is also




2257
11/5/35

-9-

"understood that your corporation does not hold stock of,
or manage or control, any bank other than
The First National Bank of Williamson.
"As you perhaps know, section 601 of the Banking Act
of 195 amended section 2(c) of the Banking
Act of 1933,
defining the term 'holding company affiliate', by adding
thereto the following paragraph:
'Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "holeing company affiliate" shall not include (except for
the purposes of section 25A of the Federal Reserve
Act, as amended) any corporation all of the stock of
which is owned by the United States, or any organization
which is determined by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System not to be engaged, directly or
indirectly, as a business in holding the stock of, or
managing or controlling, banks, banking associations,
savings banks, or trust companies.'
"In view of the above facts, the Board has determined
that your corporation is not engaged, directly, or indirectly,
as a business in holding the stock of, or managing or controlling, banks, banking associations, savings banks, or trust
companies, within the meaning of the above quoted statutory
provision, and, therefore, is not a holding company affiliate
for any purposes other than those of section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. Accordingly, it is not necessary for your
corporation to obtain a voting permit in order to vote the
stock which it owns or controls of The First National Bank of
Williamson and on this basis the Board will give no further
consideration to your application for such a permit.
"If, however, your corporation acquires control over any
other bank, or the character of the business of your corporation, the nature of its assets, or the purpose for which it
is operated should at any time differ from the description
thereof contained in this letter to an extent which would
indicate that it might be engaged as a business in holding
the stock of, or managing or controlling, banks, this matter
should again be submitted to the Board for its determination.
The Board reserves the right to make a further determination
of this matter at any time on the basis of the then existing
facts."
Letter to Mr. Walsh, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dal3as, reading as follows:
"In connection with its consideration of the application




2258
11/5/55

-10-

"of 'Central Securities Company', San Antonio, Texas,
for
a voting permit entitling it
to vote the stock which it
owns or controls of 'The South Texas National Bank
of San
Antonio', San Antonio, Texas, the Board has determined that
the applicant is not engaged, directly or indirectly, as
a
business in holding the stock of, or managing or controlling, banks, banking associations, savings banks, or trust
companies within the meaning of section 2(c) of the Banking
Act of 1933, as amended by section 301 of the Bankin
g Act
of 1935, and, accordingly, the applic
ant is not a holding
company affiliate for any purposes other than those of section 25A of the Federal Reserve Act.
"Inclosed herewith is a letter to the applicant advising it concerning the Board's action in this matter. If,
for any reason, you believe that this matter should be
reconsidered by the Board, please communicate with the Board
at once. Otherwise you are requested to transm
it the inclosed letter to the applicant. A copy of the letter is
also inclosed for your files.
"As you will note, the Board expressly reserves the
right to make a further determination of this matter at
any time on the basis of the then existing facts.
In this
connection it is requested that you advise the Board if, at
any time, you believe this matter should again be considered
by it."
Approved unanimously, together with
a letter to "Central Securities Company",
San Antonio, Texas, reading as follows:
"This refers to the application of your company for a
voting permit entitling it to vote the stock which it owns
or controls in 'The South Texas National Bank of San Antonio',
San Antonio, Texas.
"The Board understands that your company was organized
in 1929 for the purpose of dealing
in securities but that
it has never engaged in that business; that your compan
y
was inactive when City-Central Bank and Trust Company closed
in September, 1931; that, when plans relati
ng to the reorganization of such bank were developed, it was decided to
use your company as a medium for consummating such plans;
that with the assistance of a loan from the Reconstruction
Finance Corporation your company acquired the assets of such
bank and a first and finnl dividend was paid
to the bank's
creditors; that under such plans South Texas Bank and TruLt
Company (now The South Texas National Bank of San Antonio)




11/5/35

-11-

organized; that your company's only assets were acquired in connection with such plans and your company is
now engaged in liquidating such assets; that stock of your
company was issued to creditors of the old bank participating
in such plans and the stock of your company is owned princi
pally by such creditors who took such stock in order to recoup a portion of their losses resulting from the closing of
the old bank; that your company osns substantially all of
the stock of The South Texas National Bank of San Antonio
but does not own or control any other bank stock; that substantially all of such bank stock, together with other
assets, is pledged to secure the loan from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation; and that your company was not organized and is not now operated for the purpose of managing
or controlling The South Texas National Bank of San
Antonio and does not hold the stock of that bank for such purpose.
"As you perhaps know, section 301 of the Banking Act
of 1935 amended section 2(c) of the Banking Act
of 1933,
defining the term holding company affiliate, by adding thereto the following paragraph:
'Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "holding company affiliate" shall not include (except for
the purposes of section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act, as amended) any corporation all of the stock of
which is owned by the United States, or any organization which is determined by the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System not to be engaged, directly,
or indirectly, as a business in holding the stock of,
or managing or controlling, banks, banking associations, savings banks, or trust companies.'
"In view of the above facts, the Board has determined
that your company is not engaged, directly or indirectly,
as a business in holding the stock of, or managing or controlling, banks, banking associations, savings banks, or
trust companies, within the meaning of the above quoted
statutory provisions, and, therefore, it is not a holding
company affiliate for any purposes other than those of
section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. Accordingly, it
is not necessary for your company to obtain a voting permit
in order to vote the stock which it owns or controls of
The South Texas National Bank of San Antonio and, on this
basis, the Board will give no further consideration to
your application for such a permit.
"If, however, your company acquires control over any
other bank, or the purpose for which your company operates,
the purpose for which it holds the stock of the subsidiary
bank, the nature of its assets, or the character of the




2260
11/5/55

-12-

which it performs should at any time differ
from the description thereof contained in this letter to
an extent which would indicate that it might be engaged as
a business in holding the stock of, or managing or controlling, banks, this matter should again be submitted to
the Board for its determination. The Board reserves the
right to make a further determination of this matter at
any time on the basis of the then existing facts."
Letter to Ir. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, reading as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of Mr. Young's letter of
October 19, 1955, with inclosures, with further reference
to the liability of the Fayette Bank and Trust Company,
Connersville, Indiana, in connection with certain contributions made to it in 1923 by its stockholders.
"It appears from the information submitted with Mr.
Young's letter that the entire amount of these contributions
was used to eliminate assets of the bank which were on its
books as of July 10, 1923; and, assuming that the. assets
thus eliminated were deemed to be undesirable by the Banking Department of the State of Indiana, it would seem that
the bank is now under no liability to reimburse such contributing stockholders."
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. Knoke, Assistant Deputy Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, reading as follows:
"Your letter November 1. Board approves action your
directors in authorizing officers your bank to make loan
up to 0_00,000, for not to exceed 120 days, to National
Bank of Nicaragua to be secured by gold bars valued at
t499,000 noir earmarked with Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, interest on such loan to be charged at discount
rate in effect at your bank. Participation in loan by
other reserve banks approved and they are being advised by
letter accordingly."




Approved unanimously, together with
a letter to the chairmen of all Federal
reserve banks advising of the Board's action in the matter.

2261
11/5/35

-13Letter to Mr. McAdams, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent
at the

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansa
s City, prepared in accordance with the
action taken at the meeting
of the Board on October 30, 1935, and reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of August 27, 1935,
with regard to criticized actions of Mr. F.
W. Sponable,
President and director of the Miami County National Bank,
Paola, Kansas, and a Class A director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. As you know, the Board
's Division
of Examinations, prior to the date
of your letter, prepared
a summary of the criticisms of
Mr. Sponable as set forth in
the reports of examination of the natio
nal bank and related
correspondence. This summary was submitted to the Board,
and the question what, if any, actio shoul
n
d be taken by
the Board was discussed by Mr. Thomas, Vice Chairman,
with
Governor Hamilton when the latter was in Washington recently.
"All of the information available from the sources referred to was carefully considered, and the conclusion was
reached that the Board should take no action on the matter
at this time. In this connection the Board
,
took note of
the assurances given by Mr. Sponable and the direc
tors of
the national bank that there will be no further viola
tions
of law and that every effort will be made
to place the national bank in good condition. The Board requests that, in
the event the report of the next examination of the bank
contains any criticisms of Mr. Sponable, you bring them to
the Board's attention with a recommendation
as to what, if
any, action should be taken. The Board also reque
sts that
you advise Mr. Sponable of the contents of this lette
r."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Ray Bill, Sales Management, New York, New York,
reading as follows:
"Recently Mr. Paul Wooton handed Mr. Goldenweiser,
Director of the Board's Division of Research and Statis4cs, a letter you wrote to him under date of October 3
with respect to the report by Business Editors
on the subject
Of direct loans to industry.
"In the fourth paragraph of your letter you state
that 'When any official of Federal Reserve or of R.
F. C.
tells you that they have done everything that could be
done
to stimulate industrial loans, I could tell you with equAl




2262
11/5/35

-14-

"'firmness that this is not true, and our Committee can
prove the truth of our position.' Because
we are sincerely
interested in doing what we can to further the industrial
loan program of the System, we would appreciate greatl
y
your advising us of specific instances wherei
n the System
has failed to do all that it reason
ably could to make its
industrial loan program a success."
Approved unanimously.
•

Letter to Governor Schaller of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chi-

cago, reading as follow
s:
"This refers to your letter of October 29 stating that
several of your directors have raised a question with respect to the wording of the captions,
'Gold with Federal Reserve Agent'
'Gold Redemption fund - F. R. Notes'
'Gold settlement fund.'
on the daily balance sheet of the bank's Form
34.
"The question as to whether the wording of the above
items should be changed was under consideration at the time
the payment of gold into general circulation
was discontinued and it was decided that, for the time being, no change
should be made therein. It is proposed, however, to change
such captions in the balance sheet to be used for 1936, a
preliminAry draft of which, it is hoped, will be sent to
you at an early date."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Sargent, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Franci
sco, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of October 2, 1935, with
which you inclosed a copy of a letter from Mr. K. Winslow,
Jr., Vice President and Cashier of the Seattle Trust Company, Seattle, Washington,inquiring whether private banks,
building and loan associations, and mutual savings banks are
'banks' within the meaning of the provisions of subsection
(g) of section 22 of the Federal Reserve Act, which provide
that:
'If any executive officer of any member bank
borrow from or if he be or become indebted to any
bank other than a member bank of which he is an executive officer, he shall make a written report to




2263
11/5/35

-15-

"'the board of directors of the member bank of which
he is an executive officer, stating the date and
amount of such loan or indebtedness, the security
therefor, and the purpose for which the proceeds have
been or are to be used.'
"Under the provisions of section 1 of the Federal Reserve Act the word 'bank' is defined to include 'State bank,
banking association, and trust company except where national
banks or Federal Reserve banks are specifically referred tot.
The Board heretofore has had occasion to consider whether
private banks, building and loan associations, and mutual
savings banks are 'banks' within the meaning of similar provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and related provisions of
law and has consistently taken the position that private
banks and building and loan associations are not 'banks'.
The Board's rulings in the case of building and loan associations were confined to the prevailing type found in most
States, namely, those the primary function of which is to
make loans to their members upon the security of real estate
and membership shares, and which do not usually receive deposits from members or others, except installment payments
on membership shares. In the circumstances, the Board is of
the opinion that private banks and building and loan associations of the kind described above are not 'banks' within
the meaning of the provision of subsection (g) of section 22
of the Federal Reserve Act quoted above.
"Mutual savings banks are engaged in banking functions
in accepting deposits and making loans. The Attorney General
of the United States has held that mutual savings banks should
be considered 'banks' within the meaning of section 4 of the
Federal Reserve Act, and the Board has held them to be 'banks'
within the meaning of similar provisions of the Federal Reserve Act. Accordingly, the Board regards mutual savings banks
as 'banks' within the meaning of the provision of law quoted
above.
"It will be appreciated if you will advise the Seattle
Trust Company of the Board's views in this matter."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Peyton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of October 4, 1935, requesting a ruling by the Board concerning whether Northwest
Bancorporation is a holding company affiliate of Union Bank




11/5/35

-16-

"and Trust Company, Helen
a, Montana, and Daly Bank and
Trust Company, Anaconda, Montana.
"It is understood that in each instance the Reconstruc
tion Finance Corporation owns
a majority of the outstanding
shares of stock of the bank; that
such shares were voted at
the preceding elect
ion of the bank's directors and constituted a majority of the share
s voted at such election; that
such shares were voted
by a field representative of the Northwest Bancorporation under
a proxy issued for that meeting;
and that Northwest Banco
rporation owns a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of the
bank.
"Without determining whether the shares of stock owned
by the Reconstruc
tion Finance Corporation were controlled by
Northwest Bancorporation at the time of the preceding elections of directors of the banks or,
under similar circumstances, might be deemed to be so controlled
at the time of
future stockholders' meetings, the Board
is of the opinion
that, on the basis of the above fact
s, Northwest Bancorporation is not now a holding compa
ny affiliate of the banks."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reser
ve
Bank of New
York, reading as follows:
"Consideration has been given to your letter of September 18, 1935,
regarding the request of Mr. W. S. Crandell
for a ruling as
to the applicability of section 32 of the
Banking Act of 1933 to his servi
ce as director of The National
Union Bank of Kinderhook Kinde
rhook, New York.
,
"The letter from Mr. Crandell, which you inclosed,
states that he is an individual membe
r of the New York Stock
Exchange and adds, 'My activ
ities are entirely confined to
buying and selling securities for
my own account on the Stock
Exchange.' In the circumstances, you state that you and
counsel for your bank
are of the opinion that section 32 in its
present form is applicable to Mr. Crand
ell, but that it will
not be applicable
after January 1, 1936, when the amendments
made by the Banking
Act of 1935 become effective.
"On the basis of Mr. Cr8ndell's statement quoted above
,
it would seem
that he is engaged in 'purchasing, selling, or
negotiating securities' within the literal meaning of section 32 in its prese
nt form, although it does not appear
definitely whether he is 'primarily' so engaged. On the
other
hand, it appears that
he is not engaged in 'the issue, flotation,




2265
11/5/35

-17-

"underwriting, public sale, or distribution' of securities
within the meaning of section 52 as amend
ed by the Banking Act of 1955.
"Therefore, in view of the amendments to section 52 made
by the Banking Act
of 1953, the Board will interpose no objection to Mr. Crandell's service
as a director of the national bank until January 1, 1956,
the effective date of the
amendments to section 32, at which time, as stated above,
It appears that the
section will become inapplicable. Please
advise Mr. Crandell accordingly."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Case, Federal heserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
Bank of New
York, reading as follows:
"In connection with a Clayton Act application filed by
Mr. William W. Hoffm
an covering his services as officer of
The National City
Bank of New York and as officer of City
Bank Farmers Trust Company,
both of New York, New York, the
question was raised whether the provisions of section 32 of
the Banking Act of
1953 were applicable to the business
transacted by F. B. Hoffman & Company; and, in this connection, ybu forwarded to the Board
with your letter of May 2,
1955 a copy of an opini
on of counsel for your bank which
reached the conclusion that section 32 should be considered
applicable S
"It appeared from the information which had been submitted that the membership of the firm
of F. B. Hoffman 8.:
Company was composed of Mr. Hoffman and his brothers,
and
that the business of the firm consi
sted solely in the investment and reinvestment of
its assets in securities. It appeared
further that purchases and sales of securities were made on
the New York Stock
Exchange except occasionally where unlisted
securities were purchased, and that the firm had not participated in any transactions invol
ving the issue, underwriting
or distribution of
securities. The conclusion of your counsel
that section 32 was appli
cable to the relationships involved
was based upon the
fact that purchases and sales of securities
in the firm's portf
olio during each of the preceding five
Years had averaged slightly more than 70 per cent of the
total assets and that the avera
ge length of time securities
were held in its portfolio
was correspondingly short.
"However, section 52 has been amended by the Banking
Act of 1935, effective Janua
ry 1, 1936, so as to be applicable
to organizations
'primarily engaged in the issue, flotation,




2266
11/5/35

-18-

'underwriting, public sale or distribution' of securities,
and since it appears from
the information previously submitted
that this firm is not engaged
in such activities, it appears
that section 32 will not be applicab
le in this case after
January 1, 1936. Although the opin
ion of counsel for your
bank in this case does not appe
ar to be inconsistent with
rulings made by the Board in similar
cases prior to the enactment of the Banking Act of 1935, thos ruli
e
ngs show that
the question whether sect
ion 32 in its present form is applicable in this case is doubtful; and, in
the circumstances,
it seems proper to
give consideration to the amendments referred to above.
"Accordingly, the Board will interpose no objection to
Mr. Hoffman's services
in the relationships referred to in
the first paragraph of
this letter until January 1, 1936,
after which date it appears from
the information submitted
that section 52 will not
be applicable."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York
, reading as follows:
"The Clayton Act application of Mr. John Milton for a
permit to serve at the same
time as director of Hudson
County National Bank, Jersey
City, New Jersey, Commonwealth
Trust Company, Union City
, New Jersey, and United States
Trust Company of Newark, Newa
rk, New Jersey, was pending
before the Board on August 23, 1935
, and had not been acted
upon.
"Accordingly, in view of the permission granted in the
Board's resolution of September
12, 1935, a copy of which
was sent to you
with the Board's letter of September 13,
1935 (X-9317), Mr. Milt
on may continue to serve as director
of either of
the member banks named in his application and
of one of the
other banks named in thatapplication until
March 1, 1936 or unti
l the adoption of general regulations
by the Board,
whichever is the earlier, even though the prohiitions of section 8 as amended
by the Banking Act of
1935 would othe
rwise be applicable to such relationships.
"In view of the fact that the permission granted in
the Board's
resolution is applicable to only one bank
within the prohibit
ions of the Clayton Act, in addition
to one member
bank named in such application, the question
Whether Mr. Milton may
continue to serve all three banks
named in his appl
ication appears to depend upon whether
or not Jersey
City, Union City, and Newark are 'contiguous




2267
11/5/35

-19-

"tor adjacent' within the mea
ning of section 6. Further,
the question whether he may con
tinue to serve these banks
after the expiration of the permis
sion granted in the Board's
resolution appears to depend upo
n the same questions. However, it is not clear whe
ther or not the three cities are
'contiguous or adjacent' within the meanin
g of section 8,
and therefore it
will be appreciated if you will consider
the matter in the lig
ht of the Board's letter of October 11,
1935 (X-9341), and
advise the Board of your conclusions.
If you feel that the
matter should be considered by the
Board, the Board will be gla
d to do so upon receipt of full
information, together with such commen
ts and recommendations as you may care to
make."
Approved unanimously.
There were then presented the follow
ing applications for changes
in stock of
Federal reserve banks:
APPlications for ADDITI
ONAL Stock:
District No 2
The New Jersey
Title Guarantee and Trust
Company, Jersey City, N.
J.

Shares

590

District No. 7.
The Community
National Bank & Trust
Company of Knoxville
, Knoxville,
Iowa
District No. 12.
The Utah State
National Bank of
Salt Lake City,
Salt Lake City,
Utah

A2214.9114Sals
for ggli./11141_2Lk122h1
District No. 12.
The First
National Bank of Banning,
Banning, California
The McClou
d National Bank,
McCloud, California




Approved unanimously.

590

'Z

12
Total

12
605

51
45

96

2268
11/5/55

-20-

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

APPraVed3