View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1.!--4,t1(b

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Pederal Reserve System on Monday, November 3, 1952.

The Board met

in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Evans
Mills
Robertson
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Solomon, Assistant General Counsel
Chase, Assistant Solicitor

Before this meeting the attention of the members of the Board who
1/el'e in their offices had been called to a further letter addressed to the
lIcard under date of October 21, 1952, by Mr. C. F. 1,ente, President of
of iuuerica National Trust and Savings A.,sociation, San Francisco,
California, acknowledging receipt of the Board's letter of October 15, 1952,

/lith respect to participation by the bank in the forthcoming nomination and
election of Class A and R directors of the Federal Reserve Rank of San
4ancisco.

Mr. INente's letter stated that the Board appeared to have denied

the bank's request that it re-examine the situation with respect to the
"filiation between the bank and Transamerica Corporation on the ground
tb

u, since the Clayton tl.ct proceeding against the corporation was pending

1. the
courts, the Board was unwilling at this time to consider events that
aken place since the closing of the record in that case.

It also stated

that in addition to the new developments referred to in Mr. Wente's letter of




1857
11/3/52

-2-

September 27, 1952, Transamerica

Corporation had sold to the general public

tlle balance of its former stock interest in Bank of America National Trust
extd Savings

Association.

The letter contained the further statements that

ta the circumstances, the position taken in the Board's letter of October 15
seemed to be completely inconsistent with the Board's statutory responsibility
to determine the issue of affiliation for the purposes of section 4 of the
Pederal Reserve Act and that this issue involved different questions and
/las Presented in different circumstances from those considered in the Board's
Prior determination in the Clayton Act proceeding.
Consideration had been given to the question whether the letter
celled for reply and it had been suggested that, since the election polls
1/0111d not open until November 10, the Board should reply.

Accordingly, the

tollowing draft of reply had been prepared:
"The Board has received and carefully considered
your letter of October 21, 1952. However, it does not
believe the additional fact and arguments contained
therein warrant any change in its position."
During a discussion of the question whether a reply should be made,
it was stated that although articles had appeared in the press before the

4te of the Board's letter of October lj to the effect that Transamerica
N'Poration had disposed of its stock holdings in Bank of America National
and Savings Association, this development had not been mentioned in
/14'. Wente's letter of September 27 nor had the Board been advised to that




11/3/52

-3-

effect officially by the holding company affiliate or the national bank
arid, therefore, no reference to that development had been made in the
Board's letter.
In the course of the discussion, Mr. Solomon referred to the

Portion of the Administrative Procedures Act which states that anyone who
'
411ea a request of a Gcvernment agency and who is denied that request

°All be entitled to be notified of such denial.
At the conclusion of the discussion, the proposed reply to Mr. Wente
was approved unanimously, for transmittal through Mr. Wilbur, Chairman
of the Federal Reserve Bank. of San
Francisco.
Chairman Martin referred to a memorandum addressed to him under
°ate of October 27, 1952, by Mr. Thurston, Assistant to the Board, in
hiell Mr. Thurston stated that pursuant to the request

of the Board at

tlie rieeting on October 20, 1952, he had considered the replies which
010
lad be made to two letters received by Mr. Sprecher, Assistant Director,
4"-s/on of Personnel Administration, from officials of the Congress of
/t

Ustrial Organizations and the American Friends Service Committee, re-

electively.

With regard,to the first letter, Mr. Thurston favored comply-

with the request for two copies of the Board's procedures with respect
to

air employment practices.

T41,3tcm

With regard to the second letter, Mr.

felt that an appreciative acknowledgment would suffice, and his

itielaorandum suggested that, since both letters were addressed to Mr.




1859

11/3/52
Sprecher, it would be appropriate for Mr. Sprecher to reply over his own
s

ignature.
Chairman Martin then suggested that the incoming letters, together

'with Mr. Thurston's memorandum, be circulated among all of the members of
the Board and that in the absence of any objection, replies of the type
811Zeested by Mr. Thurston be sent by Mr. Sprecher.
This suggestion was approved
unanimously.
At this point, all of the members of the stal'f except Messrs.
411:enter and Kenyon withdrew from the meeting and the following additional
ctions were taken by the Board:
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Ileserve system on October 31, 1952, were approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. F. J. Sudekum, Chairman, Sub-Committee of Bank ManageCommittee to Study Capital Structures and Ratios, Missouri Bankers
488°ciat1on„ c/o First National Bank in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri,
1141 ng as follows:
"Your letter of August 12, 1952, addressed to the Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis, and marked for the attention of Mr.
Peterson, Vice President in charge of bank examinations, has
been referred to the Board of Governors for reply as your inquiry relates to System practice.
"The Board of Governors is Interested to learn that the
Bank Management Committee of the Missouri Bankers Association
has formed a new Sub-Committee to study capital structures
and ratios. It is noted that this action was due to the fact
that many banks throughout the State of Missouri have received




11/3/72

-5-

requests from various supervisory authorities to increase
their capital accounts.
"You have inquired what formula or basis the Federal
Reserve uses in determining the adequacy of bank capital.
"The Board recognizes that it would be convenient and
administratively desirable to have a 'yardstick' which could
be applied to every situation, but feels that the matter of
the capital adequacy of an individual institution may he
determined only after careful analysis of all the relevant
facts and circumstances Involved in the particular case.
Ratios are not a determinant of capital adequacy, and sound
judgment must be exercised in decidinz whether, in the light
Of all the circurestances, a bank has adequate capital in
relation to the volume, character, and condition of its
assets and its responsibilities.
"In view of the foregoing, it is not possible to give
categorical replies to your questions numbered 2, 3, 4, and
5. However, it may be helpful to mention certain aspects a:
the matter.
"As part of a sound judgment on the aclequacy of a particular bank's capital, the Board believes that it is appropriate to take into account the extent to which reserves
for contingencies or reserves -or losses are available to
lessen the risks that might otherwise be expected to fall
Upon ordinary capital accounts. The Board also eons5ders
it proper, as part of such a judgment, to recognize that
some assets entail little if any risk of lees. Yoreover,
such would include assets ether than cash and Governments
which are usually deducted in arriving at the so-called
'Risk Asset' ratio.
"As a labor saving device for making preliminary selection of those banks requiring mere detailed analysis, the
Reserve Bank and the Board of Governors use various ratios
for 'screening out' banks for further study. Nevertheless,
such ratios are recognized as being very rough bench-marks
even for screening purposes and the review analysts are aware
of other factors affecting the institution under review which
would indicate the need or lack of need for further analysis.
These factors are sought even in institutions whose ratios
are far superior to the ratios generally accepted as minima.
"It should be emphasized that any calculations of ratios
are purely preliminary ones for the purpose cf determining




1861

11/3/52

-6-

"whether to give further consideration to a particular bank.
Furthermore, it must be borne in mind that It often is not
in the public Interest or to the best interest of a Particular bank for it to attempt to rely on apparent safety of
assets as a substitute for sufficient capital.
"With respect to your inquiry regarding the issuance of
different types of capital, the Board of Governors feels that
common stock is the most desirable form of capital for banks.
The Board is not disposed to favor the issuance of capital
in any form other than common stock because of the longrange implications regarding capital if any other course is
Pursued. The Board also feels that capital notes and debentures should not ordinarily be considered a suitable form of
capital for the protection of depositors.
"With reference to your query relative to the attitude
of the Federal Reserve regarding insistence that banks needing additional capital provide such capital, it is the view
Of the Board of Governors that member banks which clearly
need additional capital, in addition to conserving earnings
and decreasing or discontinuing dividends if necessary, should
exhaust every means at their disposal to -yrovide such capital.
if new capital cannot be provided the only alternative would
be to reduce the volume of earnin, assets, eliminating first
those which contain the highest degree of risk.
"it may be of some interest to you to know that the subject of the adequacy of bank capital is urdcr contInuous study
here at the Board. Accordingly, the Board ap-)reciates the
importance of the subject to whic'o, your Sub-CoAmitteo is addressing itself and would like to receive a copy of your rePort when completed, together with any conclusions reached
and recommendations made by your Sub-Cooimi tte a."




Approved unanimously, with a
-nt,
copy to Mr Peterson, Vice Pre
St.oui
of
BInk
Reserve
Federal

•

- ,
r

Pd