View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

194
meting of the Federal Reserve Board was held in 1;as1thngton
011

Tuesday, November 28, 1933, at 2:30 p. in.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Er.
Mr.
Er.

Black, Governor
Hamlin
James
Thomas
Szymczak

Er. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Er. 'Martin, Assistant to the Governor
Er. Wyatt, General Counsel
Ni'. Paulger, Chief of the Division of
Examinations
Mr. Chamberlin, Federal Reserve Examiner
The Governor
presented the following letter received by him
/111cier date of
Lovember 21, 1633, from Mr. Albert A. Sprague, Director
Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company, Chicago,

13 "The Board
of Directors of the Continental Illinois National
„ealk and Trust Company, through an appropriate committee, has,
11.
-L
y tendered the office of Chairman of the Board to Mr. George
anneY, of Chicago.
Ranney, uho is conversant with the particular situation of
thA
"ank, and familiar with the important part that our institution
itaY in the Federal Reserve System in the Middle West, asks us to
Rerlre if his selection meets with the full approval of the Federal
or if they have any person in mind who would be more
ace;
l;Zeabi
0 am Sure his query will appeal to you as it does to us as most
4„_1
a,l prlate and indicative of his understanding of the entire situOf c-L km enclosing copies of letters sent today to the Comptroller
porefreneY and to the Director of the Reconstruction Finance Corprompted by other points raised by Mr. Ranney.
•ffith
at ea, ny best wishes to you, and asking that you favor us with
41y reply.ft
The Governor also presented
a copy of a telegram received by
4131'it

CeraPtroller of the Currency Amult under date of November 25, 1933,

I'll°1111Zre C°Connor,
Comptroller of the Currency, who is in Los Angeles,




195
13128/33

-2-

requesting that the Board withhold action on Mr. Sprague's letter until
141** O'Connor's return.
18 4

Governor Black stated that he felt lir. Ranney

very satisfactory man for the position referred to; that the ap-

P°irrtzlent of Mr. Ranney would be entirely satisfactory to him; and that,
Ishile he vas leaving Washington this afternoon and mould be away the
reet of the
meek, if agreeable to the other members of the Board, he
11°111d Place the correspondence above referred to in the hands of Mr.
4/111"E‘k as Chairman of the Executive Committee, with the suggestion
that the matter be taken up when Mr. O'Connor returns to his office on
PridaYs December 1.
No objection was expressed to the suggested
Procedure, although Mr. Szymczak stated that he
felt that action on the matter should be deferred
Pending the Governor's return to Washington on
Monday.
Reference mas then made to a memorandum dated November 25, 1933:
*(3111 Acting

Comptroller of the Currency Await, recammending that, sub-

Jeet to the

conditions. stated in the memorandum, the Board approve the
4°1-Cation

dUce its

of "The National City Bwrik of New York" for permission to re-

present common capital stock from $124,000,000 to $77,500,000,

144der a

plan which provides also for the sale of $50,000,000 of preferred
Stock to
the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and/Or others; no part of
the roloased
capital to be returned to shareholders, but to be used in
the
out

manner and
under the conditions set forth in the memorandum to charge

estimated losses and depreciation as classified in the report of exkkination of the
bank as at the close of business on April 7, 1933.
G(Ivernor Black stated that Mr. J. H. Perkins, Chairman of the




91;
11/28/33

-3-

4ard of Directors of the National City Bank, and :Ir.
Lancaster,

:
1 .oart

of counsel for the bank, called on him on Saturday in con-

nection with the proposed capital reduction, and that a telegram was
r°°eived today by the Comptroller's office from Mr. Case, Federal Reaerve Acent at New York, st,Lting that he has no hesitancy in recommending t
hat the proposed reduction be approved on condition that no part of
the
ProPosed reduction be returned to shareholders; that the bank be
requi A
re" to make such charge-offs and set up such reserves as the Comptroller
of the Currency may require; and that before such reduction
ahall
uecorne effective the bank's capital shall be increased by the issuanee
and sale of50,000,000 of - referred stock to the Reconstruction
Finazee
C
orporation and/or others. Governor Black added that Y.essrs.
Perkins
and Lancaster had been in conference with the Reconstruction
Pinai
Corporation
since last Saturday, November 25, and that Mr. Lanad reported that an agreement had practically been reached with
l'egard to the
C°rPoration.

issuance of preferred stock to the Reconstruction Finance
LI

Paulger stated that his division had checked the

l'iCures s
ubmitted in Mr. Amalt's meriorandum with the report of examinati°4 °f the bank and,
felt that
the
atr°11ø.er

found that they are in agreement, and that it is

completion of the plan will place the bank in a much

positi0n.
After discussion, itir. Szymczak moved that the
aPplication for reduction of stock under the plan
submitted be approved.
Carried.
Governor Black referred to the consideration given at the meeting




!)
4 ,:;Ji

11/28/33
-4f the Board on October 19, 1933, to the request from the Federal Reye Bank of
Chicago for approval of additional compensation for
eclAncel for the bank,
and stated that when he MS in Chicago he discussed
the matter with
Mr. Stevens and Deputy Governors McKay and Preston; that
thc latter two
were very much in favor of trying to obtain the exclusive
"
8 of ix. Dunn as counsel for the bank; and that, while Mr. Stevens
erilii
's° in favor of arranging for the exclusive services of Er. Dunn,
71" al
he
4elt that
the firm of Layer, Yleyer, Austrian and Platt should be retaineA
to handle the larger legal matters of the bank. Governor Black
8tatcd that he had advised the officers of the Chicago bank that the
'
3°11rd feels the
bank should have the full time services of competent
1 but
3111"1
"
that the bank should arrange to discontinue the present arr141 ent with the firm of Layer, Meyer, Austrian and Platt, which is
alzo
counsel for the Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust CamParo,
wq Du •
-rlne; the ensuing discussion, Mr. Szymczak stated that he under00d that
'What the bank desires at this time is some arrangement under
Idlich it
can obtain the full time services of Mr. Dunn until the end of
thc
current year When
the present arrangeme It with Mayer, Meyer, Austrian
e'lld Platt c7Pires and when it is 1)elieved a new arrangement can be made
141,th v
-r• Dunn
independently of the firm. Mr. Wyatt stated that he understood

btaziks

rti"Kair that Mr. Dunn is now giving all of his time to the

At the conclusion of the discussion, Jr.
Ss,zymczak was requested to take the matter up with
lire Stevens by telephone to ascertain the exact
nature of the present arrangement with Jr. Dunn
and the firm of Mayer, Meyer, Austrian and Platt,




11/28/33

_5_
and what the present desire of the bank is with
regard to any change in the present arrangement
and compensation of counsel.

'-ieference was then made to a memorandum dated November 22, 1933,
Prepared in the Board's Division of
Examinations with regard to a letter dated November 18,
1935, from Lir. Austin, Federal Reserve Agent at
setting forth proposed plans of reorganization, and reoPening
wIthout restriction, of the "Equitable Trust Company" and the
!to
Azar-u-ntee Trust
Company", member banks located in Atlantic City, New
jer20
Y3 ITy••
Austin stating that the banks are about to fib o their applieatioris
with the Secretary of the Treasury for a license
to open on an
1111reatricted
basis and that, before submitting his recomniendation to the
Secretary of
the Treasury, he would like to have the views of the Board
1111°11 the
various questions involved.
After discussion, the Secretary was requested
to advise Mr. Austin that the Board feels that it
Would not be justified in approving the reorganization of the trust companies under the plan submitted.
There was also
presented a copy of a circular letter dated
11°\reLlber 20, 19
33, from Mr. Wm. H. LicReynolds, Administrative Assistant
to

the c)cretEtry

of the Treasury, addressed to all offices of the Trea4111rDePartment, in vhich was quoted a letter dated November 18, 1933,
r141111° L. Vir. Douglas,
Director of the Bureau of the Budget, stating
111, i4 order
that there may be uniform practice throughout the van of the Government, it is requested
that, in so far as
111*(letl-able, all
employees be authorized to enjoy a half holiday on the
Preceding Th
csgiving. Mr. McReynolds' letter stated that, in




199
11/28/33
-6accordance With Mr. Douglas' letter, all employees of the Treasury Dewhose services can be spared, will be excused from duty at
P. m. on Wednesday, November 29, 1933.
Upon motion, it was voted that the Board's
Offices be closed at one p. m. on Wednesday,
November 29, 1933.
Morrill alluded to the action taken at the meeting of the
4ar

'
on November 15, 1933, with regard to inquiries by banks located
in Al
"ka and Puerto Rico concerning membership in the 'Federal Reserve
SYstem
-"

Under

and stated that a further letter had been received from hr. Case

date of November 21, 1933, in which he referred to inquiries which

have been
made at the New York bank by representatives of the Banco de
?once, Ponce,
the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, San Juan, and the Banco
de
Norto
Rico, San Juan, and in which he stated that the inquiries by

the Plaerto
Rico banks suggest the desirability of an early decision by
tho

Federal Reserve System as to the broad principles involved, as outin his
letter of October 20, 1933.
'1'

Liorrili also said that the matter of membership of banks in
came up at the meeting of the board of directors of the New

c3I'lcba.nk on November 23, at which Mr. Goldenmeiser, Director of
the
1)Qard's D
ivision of Research and Statistics, was in attendance, and
that Lir.
Goldenweiser, at tho request of Mr. Case, had reported in a
14°111°ra1duza dated
November 24, 1933, that it was apparently the feeling

or the bo„d of
the bank, or

directors of the bank that the Federal Reserve Board,
the two jointly, should make an investigation of the

8

-4ti°4 in Puerto
Rico and decide what policy to pursue in regard to




11/28/33

-7-

inc

Puerto Rican banks to membership, and that the discussion at

the meetin2; ended
by the appointment of a committee consisting of Mr.
°7ren D. Young and Governor Harrison to take
up the matter.
Governor Black stated that Mr. Case had called him on the telePhone this
morning and had expressed the opinion that, in view of the
111(1111'1'i-es regarding membership received from banks
in Puerto Rico, it is
\r"Y d
esirable that a survey of conditions in the island be made and
that he
would be glad to have such a survey made by the Federal Reserv
e
Ballk of
Ilew York, or, if the Board desired, in conjunction with repreatilres

of the Federal Reserve Board.
A discussion ensued, at the conclusion of
Which Mr. Hamlin moved that Mr. Case be advised
that the Board offers no objection to the iTow
York bank making such a survey of the banking and
general business conditions in Puerto Rico as is
necessary to enable the board of directors of the
bank to reach a considered decision as to the
recommendation it will make to the Federal Reserve
board in connection with the question of the admission to membership of banks located in Puerto Rico.
Carried.

In connection with
the above, idr. Hamlin stated that Ur. Herbert
bitrol„
'
called on him recently and advised him of
a survey which he made
Et:N
ori the

41co about three years El.o as
an investigator of the Bureau of
Y
Part

the

and 1,1r. Hamlin inquired whether there
would be any objection
of the members of tho Board to his transmitting
to Mr. Case

°I.rlation given to him
by kr. Brown.
No objection was expressed by the other
members of the Board to the action proposed by
r. Hamlin.
The ,„4
"LI-flutes of the meetings of the Federal Reserve Board held




201
11/28/33

-8-

ell November 6
and 7, 1933, were approved.
The Board then considered and acted upon the following matters:
Letter dated November 23, 1933, from Mr. Sproul, Secretary of
the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, and telegrams dated November 23,
433, from Mr.
McClure, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
414'2 and
November 24, 1933, from Nr. Stevens, Chairman of the Federal
Reser,„,,,
-w Bank of Chicago, all advising that, at meetings of the boards
Of di
rectors on the dates stated, no changes were made in the banks'
ezist
schedules of rates of discount and purchase.
Without objection, noted with approval.
Memorandum dated November 22, 1933, from Er. Smead, Chief of the
41181,,21

L. But

of Bank Operations, recommending the appointment of Mrs. Libbie

as a stenographic clerk in the division, with salary at the rate
(11'4
'
8°0 per annum, effective November 27, 1933; the recommendation hay'.beell approved by four members of the Board on November 24, 1933.
Approved.
klemorandmm dated November 23, 1933, from Mr. Faulger, Chief
of
theDi7ision of Examinations, requesting the appointment of Mrs.
Nadine
144411agher as a
clerk in the division, with salary at the rate of
41'66° Per
annum, effective as of the date upon which she enters upon
tilePertormance of her duties; the request having been approved by six
Illszobers of
the Board on November 27, 1933.
Approved.
theti .Lemorandum
dated November 25, 1933, from Mr. Smead, Chief of
.7.181°r1 of Bank Operations, stating that on October 20 Mr. Merret




202
11/28/33

-9-

Caskey, an
on

employee in the division, was obliged to leave the office

account of illness and has since that date been under treatment for

krtial paralysis; that it is understood that a somewhat prolonged peri0(1 will elapse
before Mr. Caskey can return to duty; and that, in view

()this
he be

record since appointment in August, 1919, it is recommended that

granted sick leave with full pay until February 1, 1934, before

17111eh date
a further recommendation with regard to his leave status will

be zlade
to the Board.
Approved.
Telegraphic reply on November 20, 1933, approved by five members
,,
el' the B
oara to a letter dated November 14 from Mr. Stevens, Federal
Re
serve Agent
at Chicago; the reply reading as follows:
t "Your letter fourteenth. Board approves appointment Wilbur
1,88er as Assistant Examiner in Federal Reserve Agent's department
bank at salary rate of 02,400 per annum with understanding he
.L1 continue
systematic reduction indebtedness Menasha bank.
ig1ease
:
0
advise effective date. In connection with future selections
examiners your attention is directed to the importance of bearin mind the expression contained in X 7638 of the Board's view
that
eo ,_lt is clearly undesirable for employees in the Federal reserve
dellu's departments engaged in audits and examinations to be inilluted directly or indirectly to any bank or banking institution
their respective Federal reserve districts."
Approved.
Telegraphic reply
on November 20, 1933, approved by five members

the

Board, to a letter dated November 14 from Er. Stevens, Federal

4eeerve Agent
at Chicago; the reply reading as follows:
A. "Your
letter November 14 re
-7 exeoliner in
Federal Reserve
°17 information obtained from
!
°r(1. as receiver, concerning
"""s Board feels that it would
aPPaintment."

%




temporary appointment L. B. Achor
Agent's department your bank. In
Comptroller's office regarding his
which Er. Paulger has already advised
not be justified in approving his

Approved.

203
11/28/33
-10Letter dated November 23, 1933, to Yr., Helm, Deputy Governor
qthe Federal Reserve Bank of Ker.nas City, approved by five members of
the
Board, statihg that, in accordance with the recommendation contained
5441118 letter of November 7,'the Board approves changes in the personnel
Classification plan of the Denver branch to provide for two new positions,
the dis
continuance of four positions, a change'in the salary range of one
Pcicition, and changes in the titles of three positions, in various dektrtraents of the branch.
Approved.
Letter dated November 24, 1933, to Mr. Clark, Secretary of the
Fe4erIti Reserve Bank of Atlanta, approved by five members of the Board,
13141ti4g tht, in accordance with the recommendation contained in his
letter
of
November 13, the Board approves changes in the personnel clas6141c4t104 Plan of the Nashville and New Orleans branches to provide for
th0
"
1 Positions of "elevator operator and guard" in the Custodian Ileootstruction Pi

Ce

Corporation Department of the Nashville branch,

Ntesistant to chief clerk" and "messenger" in the Custodian - Re-

k441

e°114t11.1etion Finance Corporation Department of the New Orleans branch,
Or

eL

increase in the salary range of the position of "porter and

i""itortt in
the Custodian
Of tal

Reconstruction Finance Corporation Department

liashville branch.
Approved.

Letter

dated November 22, 1933, to Er. Stevens, Federal Reserve

Etellt Et chi
---oago, approved by five members of the Board, reading as

follows*




204

1

11/28/33

-11-

"lhe hoard has given very careful consideration to your letter
of June 8 in regard to your identification with The Texas Corporation, Diamond Match Company, and Wilson & Co., Inc., as a director
thereof. As pointed out in its circular letter of ialy 7, 1924,
X-4048, to which attention was called in its circular of April 29,
A-7425, the Board feels that officers of the Federal reserve
nks should not be identified with any outside business interests.
ls the opinion of the Board that the holding of directorships of
the kind
referred to in your letter is inconsistent with the vie=
expressed in the Board's letter of May 7, 1924."
Approved.
Telegram dated November 22, 1933, to Lir. Newton, Federal Reserve
Itt Atlanta, approved by four members of the Board, reading as follow8t

"Refer your August 31 reply to Board's letter B-906 of August 10
,nrding
Is
compensation of executive officers and directors of Fed'l714
1
Reserve and member banks requested in Senate Resolution 75.
ePorts
received from 11 Reserve banks listed all or nearly all Re8erve bank
officers while report from one bank listed only the
fhairman,
e
governor and deputy governors. It is understood that no
action has been taken by your directors to designate certain
-61:,!cOrs as 'executive officers' and inasmuch as it is desirable
8
reports be uniform for all Federal Reserve banks it has been
rtolCgested that reports show names and salaries of chairmen, goverfr,tdePutY governors and cashiers only for the head offices and
waging
directors, assistant managers and cashiers for the
Elt"ches. This would comprise 5 positions, including one vacancy,
yot Y°11r head office, 3 at the New Orleans branch and 2 at each of
other branches and agencies. If this plan is adopted a sentenr
son
"mAght be inserted in letter sending reports to Senate reading
pe4w114t as follows: 'Inasmuch as it is not the practice of the
ti x-ral Reserve
banks to designate certain of their officials as
erjeutive officers", the inclosed statements relating to the Fedsuciti 111)eserve
banks show the compensation paid to the directors of
&13011.ZIcs and to the principal officers who have the primary reof carrying out the general policies adopted by the
sil,
er,fr8 of the banks'. Please advise whether you concur in above
rep r
°11 and, if so, whether proposed sentence in letter submitting
aalar:'8 to Senate meets with your approval. If any portion of
the
ar enc2
;e8 °f any of the officers of your bank wore paid by an outside
811°11 as the R. .1,4 G. or the Treasury Department, during the
Period ,
office vulY 1, 1932 to June 30, 1933, please state the names of such
per, I's, the exact
amount so paid, the agencies by -whom paid, the
.Lod
covered and the net amount paid by the Federal Reserve bank."

O




11/28/33

Approved, together with similar telegrams
dated November 22, 1933, to the l'ederal reserve
agents at other Federal reserve banks.
Letter dated November 20, 1933, to the board of directors of
the "8ecurity State Bank of Houston", Houston, Minnesota, approved by
four

members of the Board, stating that, subject to the conditions pre-

eribed 4

4n the letter, the Board approves the bank's application for

11111er8hiP in the Federal Reserve System and for the number of shares
°f 8tc)ck of the Federal Reserve Bank of anneapolis to which the bank
74
'
11 be entitled upon the basis of its capital and surplus as of the
dEtte
t1Pon 'which its membership becomes effective.
Approved.
th,
the

Letter dated Lovember 21, 1933, to the board of directors of
PeoPles Bank and Savings Company", Cincinnati,
Ohio, approved by

f011r Inelobers

of the Board, stating that, subject to the conditions set

north
the letter, the Board approves the bank's application for memberahiP in the Federal
Reserve System and for stock in the Federal Re"rile Bank of Cleveland, effective if and when such bank is authorized
tc3re°13
"by the Superintendent of Banks of the State of Ohio, with the
tillicier8t"ding that prior to admission to membership the reorganization
Of th° bank will
be effected in substantial conformity livith the plan of
r"rDnization dated October 19, 1933.
Approved.
Letters dated lovember 22, 1933, approved by five members of
the b°4rd, to the
boards of directors of the following named State banks,
s"11 letter
8tating that, subject to the conditions prescribed in the




206
11/28/33

-13-

letter, the
Board approves the bank's application for membership in the
?sclera.).

Reserve System and for the number of shares of Federal reserve

1414cstoCk to Ithich the bank mill be entitled upon the basis of its capand surplus as of the date upon which its membership becomes effective:

Federal Reserve Bank

Applicant Dank
"Via.dena County Sta-i,e Bank", Viradena,
lannesota.
"Iiittall State Bank", Vernal, Utah.

Minneapolis
San Francisco

Approved.
Letter dated iTovember 23, 1933, to the board of directors of the
"Pirst

State Bank of
Rushmore", Rushmore, Minnesota, approved by four
Illellibers of
the Board, stating that, subject to the conditions prescribed
ill the letter, the
Board approves the bank's application for membership
ill the Federal
Reserve System and for the number of shares of stock of

the

ped.e_c

i Reserve
Bank of Linneapolis to which the bank will be entitled
IIP°r1 the basis of its capital and surplus as of the date upon which its
rile* ship
becomes effective.
Approved.
the

Letters dated
riovember 23, 1933, approved by five members of
Board, to the
boards of directors of the following named Stale bank-

ina

tituti n, each
letter stating that, subject to the conditions
Pl'eceribed it

the letter, the Board approves the institution's applica-

toll
for

niembershiP in tIle Federal Reserve System and for the number of
1-larec of
POderal reserve bank stock to which the institution will be

entitled upou
the basic of its capital and surplus as of the date upon




4r
...vv.
,

I"

11/28/33
-147thich its membership becomes effective:
Applicant Bank

Federal Reserve Bank

"The Cortland Savings and Banking
Company", Cortland, Ohio.
r
"The Bank of halifax", Halifax,
Virginia.

Cleveland
Richmond

Approved.
Letters dated Eovember 24, 1933, approved by four members of
the I3°ard, to the boards of directors of the following named State
barar4
'Jag institutions, each letter stating that, subject to the condiprescribed in the letter, the Board approves the institution's
41°11-cation for membership in the Federal Reserve System and for the
Illatber
of shares of Federal reserve bank stock to which the institution
76.11 be entitled
upon the basis of its capital and surplus as of the
d4te 1113°11. vhivh its membership becomes effective:
Applicant Lank
11,
1-enk of Bethleh
em", Delmar, ICeig
York.
II 1
eattle Trust Company", Seattle,
l'iashington.

.

Federal Reserve Bank

New York
San Francisco

Approved.
Letters dated November 27, 1933, approved by five menbers of
'Ole /3
°14
'rd, to the boards of directors
of the following named State banks,

et''eh 10A-4_
letter

-"er stating that, subject to the conditions prescribed in the

'the Board approves the bank's application for membership in the
Pedertti

141.1-Lk t

&tea
re:

Reserve System and for the number of shares of Federal reserve

"k to which the bank will be entitled upon the basis of its caprplus as of the date upon which its membership becomes effec-




208
11/28/33
Applicant Bank

Federal Reserve Bank

"Farmers
State Bark", Victor, Montana.
Solano County Bank", Fairfield,
California.

Minneapolis
San Francisco

Approved.
Letters dated November 27, 1933, approved by six members of the
lk)ard, to
the boards of directors of the following named State banks,
elleh letter
stating that, subject to the conditions prescribed in the
letter,
the Board approves the
bank's application for membership in the
'ckleral Reserve
System and for the nutter of shares of Federal reserve
ballk stock to
which the bank will be entitlad upon the basis of its capi'411 and
surplus as of the date upon which its membership becomes effectivel

iicant Bank

Federal Reserve Bank

"The Bank
of Amityville", Amityville,
0,
liew York.
The Peconic
Bank", Sag Harbor, Now
0, York.
40bac00
Exchange Bank", Edgerton,
"
Wisconsin.
State Bank of
Belle Plaine", Belle
Plaine, Minnesota.
State Bank
of Gibbon", Gibbon,
L
innecota.

New York
New York
Chicago
Minneapolis
Minneapolis

Approved.

4151*Ire

Telegram dated November 21, 1933, to Mr. Curtiss, Federal
Re-

ACent at bo
ton, approved by three members of the Board, reading
rol,
4.4.0wt:

etive as of 1:ovember 20, 1933, Board has amended condition
1933ered twenty-four, as set forth in its letter of November 1,
to 1,Q, t° Beard of Directors of Merrill Trust Company, Bangor, Maine,
'
ad Es follows Quote The plan for the reorganization of the




209
11/28/33

-1G-

"old bank shall be duly consummated in accordance with its terns.
Unquote."
Approved.
Telegraphic reply addressed to Er. Curtiss, Federal Reserve
Acent at
Boston, on :ovember 25, 1933, approved by four members of the
Board, to
telegr ams dated November 23 and 24 from Mr. Curtiss and Br.
Younc,
Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston; the reply rooda° follows:
"Retels November 23-24 in re Bar Harbor Banking and Trust ComPanY, Bar Harbor, liaine, condition number twenty-ono stop In view
.0tf advice that Parker loan VAS legal when made, has been reduced
162,500 since examination in July and is reported adequately
.ecured and in accordance with your recommendation, condition number
twenty-one is amended by striking out the first five words of
13tIell condition reading as follows quote prior to admission to memershiP unquote and inserting in lieu thereof the following words
,
:
111 c)te 'within one year after date of admission to membership unquote
illth the
understanding, however, that the loan will be reduced to
'Legal limits as rapidly as possible."
Approved.
Reply on hovamber 27, 1933, approved by six members of the
toEtra,
-ce a letter dated November 18 from Li-. Curtiss, Federal Reserve
4C'
34t at

Boston; the reply reading as follows:
ti

Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of November 18, 1933,
W_-'nutting a request from the New Britain Trust Company, New Britain,
:
inriecticut, for
an extension of thirty days of the time within
el
: h the aamission of such trust company to membership in the Fedal
Reserve System may be accomplished, and, pursuant to your recon, the Board extends the time within which the admission
21,th1s institution to memLership may be accomplished to December
It is understood, of course, that Federal reserve bank
tt,
'
proe'c. will not be issued to this institution unless unqualified aperjal by the State Bank Commissioner to its subscription to Fedreserve bank stock is obtained.”
Approved.
Telegraphic




reply on November 21, 1933, approved by four members

210
11/28/33

-17-

Of the Board, to a telegram dated 1:ovember 20 from Er. Newton, Federal
Reserve .miLent
Aat Atlanta; the reply reading as follows
"Referrinr; to your telegram of November 20, 1933 re application
Bank of Slidell, Slidell, Louisiana, Board will consider bank has
eeraplied with conditions of membership within the time granted if
check now in your hands for payment of capital stock is collected
in due course."
Approved.
T elegraphic

reply on November 21, 1933, approved by four members
of the Ti
-oard, to a
telegram dated November 20 from Mr. Stevens, Federal
4erlre Agent at Chicago; the reply reading as follows:
n

application Guthrie County State Bank, Guthrie Center, Iowa.
grants applicant extension of time to December 20, 1933
wIthin uhich time to comply with conditions of membership.
Please
so advise
the bank."
Approved.
T
elegraphic reply on November 21, 1933, approved by four members
°e the

Board, to a letter dated November 16 from Mr. Peyton, Federal Re-

4ent at Linneapolis; the reply reading as follows:
:
E4 Referring to your letter
November 16 re application Merchants
ef Winona, 'Winona, annesota,Board grants extension of time
uocen
b
.ber 20, 1933 within which to comply with conditions of mamershipsu

Approved.
Telecraphic

Of

reply on November 24, 1933, approved by five members

h

e 13°Erd, to a letter dated
November 20 from Mr. Peyton, Federal Re-

Or vs

at

i4inneapolis; the reply reading as follows:

0R—er
of, Li,;'1your letter Lovamber 20 re application First State Lank
ary
Y, Libby, Yontana. Board grants extension of time to 4.Tax:.u'' 1934 within which to accomplish admission to membership.'




Approved.

2'11
11/28/33
-18Reply on November 23, 1933, approved by five me-lbers of the
L°ard, to a
letter dated November 9 from itr. Curtiss, Federal Reserve
ACellt at Boston; the reply reading as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of November 9, 1933,
I arding the opinions rendered by the Attorney General of the
otate of Connecticut on October 24 And 25, 1933, with reference
to admission of mutual savings banks and State banks and trust, comanies in Connecticut to membership in the Federal Reserve System.
-Lou re quested advice as to whether it will be satisfactory to the
• oard for you to advise each State institution in Connecticut which
Is a member of the Federal Reserve System as to the problems inv
Ao1vo d in
their membership in view of the opinions rendered by the
tt°rneY General of the State of Connecticut.
The Federal Roserve Board has no objection to your advising
each State morer institution in Connecticut of the problems inY°1ved in the membership of such institution in view of the opinas rendered by the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut.
c)Illever, as you now know, the Board on November 13, 1933, forwarded
a copy of a letter which it addressed to the Bank Commissioner
cl()
f,
b the
State of Connecticut on November 9, 1933, and also on Nevem&
ti!
:
i 13
'1033, addressed a letter to you referring to the fact that
a - admission to membership of the New Britain Trust Company, the
!Placation of which had previously been approved, should not be
snleted unless formal advice of the unqualified approval by the
_IL() Bank Commissioner of the subscrintion for stock in the Fedreserve bank by that trust comnany was obtained. In these
2-r?umstances,
it is suggested that before you take up with the
.4.(1?-ndual member banks the question of the problems involved in
t. membership in the Federal Reserve System you discuss the matthe Bank Commissioner of the State of Connecticut in the
acht of the Board's view, as expressed in the letters referred to
AtZve• In this connection, in view of the position taken by the
it °P
.fley General of the State of Connecticut, it also appears that
c_ 17111 be necessary for the stockholders of the New Britain Trust
8i7a1,1Y to approve the application of that trust company for memberFederal Reserve System even if the Commissioner of Banks
Should
give his unqualified approval of the admission of
.,tdecrust comnany to membership.
Z
tidr.
rd
e.w!11 appreciate advice as to any further developments
in

r

Approved.
o

"lographic reply on November 23, 1933, approved by five members
h0

130 arA

CO a telegram dated November 9 from Mr. lioxton, Federal




212
11/28/33
-19Reserve Agent at Richmond; the reply reading as follows:
"Retel November 9. On basis of Board's ruling of November 8
‘Trans. 1905), State banks applying for membership will be re.1111red to treat proceeds of capital notes or debentures sold to
" F. C. under the provisions of Section 304 Act :jarch 9, 1933,
O.s
amended, as part of their capital in determining amount of
stock in Federal reserve bank to be subscribed for."
Approved.
Telegraphic reply on November 23, 1933, approved by five menbers

eral

of the Board,
to a telegram dated November 4 from Mr. Walsh, FedReserve Agent at Dallas; the reply reading as follows:
"Rotel November 4. Bank debentures in form substantially same
R. F. C. form P.S. 2, revised August 18, 1933, would meet requirements in :.-7594a, in which position Was taken that the proof capital debentures may properly be included in determining
01 capital and surplus funds of bank are adequate in relation
t0
its total deposit liabilities within meaning of Board's usual
adition of
membership number fifteen, provided such debentures
;
( . 1 subject to payment by bank only after claims of depositors and
bre
r
creditors are satisfied. As stated therein, provision should
:
cr lade at time of issuance of such debentures for appropriate in—
cf capital stock of bank if and when such debentures are to
be
°2
0,
4 retired.
In deLermining whether a bank has minimum capital re11:*red by law for admission to membership, however, Board's wire of
br.ember 8 (Trans. 1905) only authorizes proceeds of capital deMarchpurchased by R. F. C. under provisions Section 304 Act
9, 1933, as amended, to be considered as capital."

r

Approved.
Telegraphic reply
on liovember 23, 1933, approved by five members
Of the 13
°ard, to a telegram dated November 16 from 1.1r. Newton, Federal
"
0 APok

at San Francisco; the reply reading as follows:

"Ret
T°- -0vember 16. On basis of Board's ruling of November 8
(Tra
eli; 8
: 1905), Board would consider State bank in town of 10,000
e for membership mith 350,000 paid up and unimpaired common
und:,
,
c and 50,000 proceeds of capital debentures sold to R. F. ,C.
4 provisions
Section 304 Act of larch 9, 1933, as amended.'




Approved.

11/28/3,
6
,

-20Reply on November 21, 1333, approved by four members of the
1300.1.,;
-"' “) a letter dated Lovember 14 from jr. Peyton, Federal Reserve
liCont at
Minneapolis; the reply reading as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of :ovember 14, 1933,
!!-Ivlsinc that the 'Peoples State Bank of tlainviewt, Plainview,
L
tinnesota, had increased its capital stock to Q25,000, and ins
cl°sing a certification from the Commissioner of Banks of the
tae of lannesota to that effect.
iherefore, and in accordance with your recommendation, the
board will take no action regarding the termination of the bank's
insmbership in the System by reason of the failure to effect an
.sj.rller increase in the capital stock as required under the conditl°n2 of membership prescribed by the Board and accepted by the
,ank at the time of its admission to membership in the Federal Re,ierve
System."
Approved.
Reply on November 23, 1933, approved by three members of the
1.0 a letter dated November 3 from Er. 1.:cClure, Federal Reserve
,ent at

xansas Laty; the reply reading as follows:

'eccipt is acknowledged of your letter of november 3, 1933
,
t;',;75-sing of certain improvements effected in the condition of
State Bank', Winfield, Kansas, together with advice as to
Other
Plans of the bank's management for making further necessary
`TstmenLs to place the institution in satisfactory condition.
co in
ew of such improvements and the bank's plan for further
lujrections and also in view of your recoinmendation, the Board
be,,1 take no action at this time with respect to the bank's momsh
in the Federal Reserve System.
Owever, it will be appreciated if you will advise the Board,
When
SUch
ormation is available, as to the classification of
securities acquired by the bank in exchange for assets classithod as loss in the amount of %. 60,000, and also if you will keep
,"-rd advised from tie to time of further improvements in the
barikB
ter.,'3 condition in accordanoe with the plan outlined in your let-

Approved.
RePlY on November 27, 1933, approved by six members of the
t
a letter dated November 17 from 1:Ar. Case, Federal Reserve




214
11/28/33

-21-

at Nev, York; the reply reading as follows:
'Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of November 17, 1033,
tr
ansmitting a copy of a letter addressed to you by the Chairman
of the Board of the Bank of the Manhattan Company, with further
reference to the disposition by that bank of its holdings of stock
in the County Trust Company of Mite Plains, ilellf York, and the
9°I'llinc Trust Company and North Side State Bank, both of Corning,
l'em' York, the correspondence indicating that arrangements have been
Completed for the merger of the two last named institutions under
the title of the Corning Trust Company.
"In view of the facts that arrangements have been completed for
the merger
of the Corning Trust Company and the North Side State
31an1 and the
sale of the holdings of the Bank of the Manhattan ComrPanY in the merged institutions and that a date has been determined
1Upon for the actual transfer, the Board in accordance with your
2?Qmmendation will extend to February 1, 1934, the time within
r2-oh the Bank of the Manhattan Company may dispose of its interests
L the
Corning Trust Company and the North Side State Bank.
view also of the information submitted relative to the situin;lt
White Plains and your recommendation, the Board extends
11 April 1, 1934, the time within which the Bank of the Manhattan
Companyc
may dispose of its holdings of stock in the County Trust
Bo'XinY of White Plains. You are requested, however, to keep the
at.
advised, from time to time, as to the procTess of any negotiations for the
sale of such stock."
Approved.
Reply on November 24, 1933, approved by four members of the
130ard
, to a
letter dated September 18 from Er. Case, Federal Reserve
at New
York; the reply reading as follows:
It
Receipt is
acknowledged of your letter of September 18, 1933,
l ont°.
si inc, a report of examination of the 'Montclair Trust Company',
1,33c'air, low Jersey, made as at the close of business May 24,
,
b
for the
purpose of developing further information requested
a4
ss ule Board
relative to the purchase of certain of the assets and
the"tion of the
deposits and borrowed money liabilities, as at
and i'°8° of business March 22, 1933, of the Essex Title Guaranty
mezio rust Company, a nonmember, by the Montclair Trust Company, a
4r institution,
both of Montclair, New Jersey.
actil'rom the
information submitted, it would appear that the transnot result in any material change in the character of the
provis of the Montclair Trust Company or broadening in the functions
tiorl QuslY exercised by it within the meaning of the general conditinder mhich the Montclair Trust Company was admitted to the




tA..d_

11/28/33

-22-

"Federal Reserve System, and in accordance with your recomendatlen the Board will interpose no objection to the transaction, provlded that the agreement and transfer are approved by the Department of Banking and Insurance of the State of I:evr Jersey and that
krie legal phases of the matter meet with the approval of your
C
ounsel."
Approved.
Letter dated November 24, 1933, to Li-. Williams, Federal ReaQrve ACent at Cleveland, approved by four members of the Board, reading
48 follovitt
1,O "Receipt is acknowledged of Mr. Fletcher's letter of October 31,
,43, relative to the proposed merger of the Dollar Savings and
.f11.73t. Company of wheeling, West Virginia (a nonmember bank) with
he
l'iheelinTz Bank and Trust Company of that city (a member bank)
undv the
charter of the latter institution.
The Federal
Reserve Board understands that the proposed merger
:
ill not result in any change in the corporate existence of the
iner bank affecting its status as a member of the Federal Reserve
,4"era; that the proposed transaction will not result in any change
r the gene
ral character of the assets of the Meelinr; Bank and
st
Company or in the scope of the functions exercised by it
1.ra.n the meaning of the general condition under which the instith 1°11 was admitted to the Federal Reserve System; and that after
be
e transaction is completed the assets and liabilities of the memtl,r bank will be substantially of the same character and amounts as
ti,;(1'le set out in
the tentative consolidated statement contained in
14111emor andum of Mr. S. C. Shull, Examiner, forwarded to the Board
tio41r.Pletcher's letter of October 31, 1933, except the elimina0„1s prescribed
herein. On this basis, and pursuant to the rect;:n.etndation of your office, the Board will interpose no objection
vit1,4° Proposed transaction, provided it is consummated in accordance
an agreement of merger which meets with the approval of your
1, and the Banking Department of the State of West Virginia.
Board's consent is given, however, on the condition that
"Therit
sonjcized assets aggregating approximately 2,448,000 and reprebe e lr) the items classified as doubtful and loss in both banks will
ills,-;azinated in the consolidated institution; that the consolidated
will agree to eliminate as soon as possible all loans
Secured
,in whole or in part by its own stock or obtain other adelesecurity for each such loan; and that the member bank will
t
,quire from the Dollar Savings and Trust Company as a result
fuli!le,rnerger any corportLte stocks other than those which might lam,
bo purchased by a national bank under the provisions of the
.,onal Bank Act.

Z




11/28/33

-23-

. "It is also understood that, prior to the merger, representatives of your office will conduct an investigation of the Trust
Department of the Dollar Savings and Trust Company to determine
definitely whether
the general character of its business and its
IllanaZement and operation are such as to be acceptable in the member bank.
"In order that the Board's records may be complete, it will be
appreciated if you will forward to the Board copies of the merger
agreement actually executed by the institution, any amendments to
the charter
of the member bank, and any authorizations of the State
authorities
coveriry; the transaction."
Approved.
Letter dated November 25, 1933, to Lr. Stevens, Federal Reserve
ACerit at Chicago, approved by four members of the Board, reading as
tollows
t
"Reference is made to Ir. Young's letter dated September 2G,
1933, in regard to the transaction whereby the 'Hillsdale Savings
41110 , a member institution, and the First State Savings Bank, a
ITI?Ineler institution, both of Hillsdale, Michigan, and both of
"Ilch were formerly under conservatorship, were merged under the
jel ter of the Hillsdale Savings Bank and under the name of the
2-41sda1e
to reopen State Savings Bank, and the continuing bank was licensed
on September 6, 1933.
th In view of the apparently liquid condition of the institution,
C e
liminaLions effected, and the fact that the merger has been
-1?Preved by the
State Banking Department and the institution pertrtted to reopen, together with the statement by Ir. Young that the
4112aotion did not result in any violation of the member bank's
__;leral condition of membership under which it was admitted to the
Reserve System, the Board will interpose no objection to
.
d;
:
13. merger of
the First State Savings Bank with the Hillsdale SayBank, provided that you ()I.:Lain an opinion from your counsel
the consolidation did not result in any change affecting the
statu5
of the Hillsdale Savings Bank as a member of the Federal Reof Ye System independently of the question of
a possible violation
opi s condit onof membership. Please forward a copy of the
to tt°n rendered by your counsel on this point, giving a reference
tio "e provisions
of the Michigan lam under which the consolidaa„1_1 17as effected, and also furnish the
Board with copies of any
ements covering the consolidation.
"

r

Approved.
Letter dated
november 27, 1933, to Li.. I:ewton, Federal Reserve




11/28/33

-24-

Agent at San
Francisco, approved by five members of the Board, reading
as

follows:
"Reference is made to the absorption of the Peoples First Avenue
Bank and the peoples :korth Seattle Bank, both nonmember banks in
Seattle, c;ashinton, by the 'Peoples Bank and Trust Company',
Seattle, Washington, effective as of Yarch 14, 1933.
"The Board has reviewed the analysis of report of examination of
the Peoples
Bank and Trust Company as or :Lay 24, 1933, information
.11bmitted with your letters dated idarch 31, 1933, and August 21,
and other data inclosed with idr. Sargent's letter dated April
1933, and, in accordance with your recommendation, the Board
IkLil interpose no objection to the transactions, provided that you
an opinion from your counsel that he is satisfied with the
legal.
aspects of the matter and that the absorptions did not result
l
en any chance affecting the status of the Peoples Bank and Trust
1111PanY as a member of the Federal Reserve System independently of
question of possible violation of its conditions of membership.
t,'!ase forward a copy of the opinion rendered by your counsel in
;
11s matter, giving reference to the provisions of Washington laws
Under which the absorptions were effected, and also furnish the
Board with copies
of amendments to the charter of the member bank,
if any.
In
,reviewing the information submitted however, it is noted
the. the
t4 _
Peoples Bank and Trust Company is undercapitalized, parularly in view of the large volume of criticised assets remain4G in the institution, and it is felt that steps should be taken,
as it is practicable to do so, to effect a further eliminae_"._ 1 of substandard loans and securities depreciation, and to
engthen the capital structure."

4

Approved.
Letter
Itent at
lovm:

dated i- -ovember 24, 1933, to 1;:r. Stevens, Federal Reserve

Chicago, epproved by four members of the Board, reading as fcl-

Hp _ .
1,3 "elpt is acknowledged of Lir. Young's letter of :,ovember 15,
pa4Q, transmitting
a request of the Luscatine Bank and Trust Com:1:118catine, Iowa, for permission to assigi without recourse
a nY
the"e securod by a
first real estate farm mortgage inasmuch as
rik has been offered a satisfactory cash settlement.
general condition of membership numbered twelve restricts
noter
:'er bank from engaging in the business of issuing or selling
debi:L_Icnds, mortgages, certificates or other evidences of insion'ness representing real estate loans except with the pernisof the Federal Reserve Board, and it seems clear that the bank

4Z




1-IA8/33

-25-

should not be considered as engaging in the business of selling
notes or other evidences of indebtedness secured by real estate
mortgages by reason of the transaction referred to above. Thereftore, permissior of the board is not necessary to consummate the
ransaction.
It is suggested that you advise the bank accordingly
aLid that the Board 1011 interpose no objection to the transaction."
Approved.
Reply on November 22, 1933, approved by five members of the
130ard, _
to letters dated October 16 and November 3 from hr. i!eviton,
Federal Reserve Agent at Atlanta; the reply reading as follows:
aeceipt is acknowledged of your letter of October lcd, 1933,
,
closure, advising that 'The Pascagoula National Bank of Noss
liOdin3J Moss
Point, Lississippi, has been continuously deficient
itS required reserves for more than six months. Receipt is acowledged, also, of your subsequent letter dated November 3, 1933,
dtinclosurec, in regard to such reserve deficiencies.
is noted that the bank's delinquency has been called to the
ention of its officers and directors and that steps have been
'
'
co en to correct the situation. In the circumstances, and in ac„rdarIce with your recommendation, the Board will take no action
at
time regarding the bank's continuous reserve deficiencies,
Other
than to forwurd copies of your letters and inclosures to the
teraptroller of
the Currency for his information. However, it will
t4_aPPreciated if you will advise the Board, within a reasonable
as -0 =7:
1 the bank has restored and is maintaining its
re
reserves."

Z

Approved.
Gr4ta

r

Letter dated November 24, 1933, to the "First National Bank in
Grand Forks, north Dakota, approved by four members of

t6
"-eard

readin, as follows:

Federal Reserve Board approves your application for pernisZZ_t° act, when not in contravention of State or local law, as
'executor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds,
D.111;,;?°
of estates, assignee, receiver, committee of estates of
truaticc, or in any other fiduciary capacity in which State banks,
1; 111Paries or other corporations which come into competition
.st , national
banks are permitted to act under the laws of the
jelelZe of Eorth
Dakota, the exercise of all such rights to be subt° the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and the regula" er the
Federal Reserve Board.

4




219
11/28/33
"This letter will be your authority to exercise the fiduciary
Powers as set forth above. A formal certificate covering such
authorization will be forwarded to you in due course."
Approved.
Letter dated :iovember 21, 1933, to Lir. 1:AcClure, Federal Reserve
ACent at Kansas
City, approved by five members of the Board, reading as
fel1owts:
"Reference is made to the application of the 'National Bank of
Tulsa,, Tulsa,
Oklahoma, for full fiduciary powers, which has
been held in abeyance awaiting a report of examination of the apPlirnt bank made as of August 31, 1033.
'he application has been considered again in the light of the
new report of examination, and, in view of the large amount of
criticized assets shown therein, the aggregate of items classified
as doubtful
and losses exceeding the amount of the bank's surplus
1?d
common capital by approximately 869,000, the criticisms made
ty the examiner of the present management and of the officers and
trust
committee selected for the proposed trust department, and
t'Le Unfavorable circumstances surrounding the activities of the
ust departments in the preceding institutions, the Board feels
u",t it should not grant fiduciary powers to the applicant bank
IlL11 certain changes and corrections have been effected.
"Consideration
has been given to the circumstances surrounding
ire or 7
,ahization of this inIstitution, the important position held
it in the banking and commercial activities of Tulsa and the
f't:rCe territory
tributary thereto, the desirability of assuring as
as Possible its successful operation, and the value of fiduciary
Powers to the bank in achieving that end. Consideration has
been given to the fact that the Reconstruction Finance Corporathrouch its large investment in preferred stock, is the bank's
m:ritY stockholder and therefore is vitally concerned that the
and"nent shall operate the bank on a sound and conservative basis
Le interested in seeing that such changes are made in
t- "3r the directorate or the official staff as may become necessary
et.ttain that end.
of;
in this connection the Board notes the statements in your letter
bazieyember 13, 1933, that your Executive Committee feels that the
being conservatively managed at this time, that the conditien
the b°f its assets should improve steadily, that the management of
e*nd its directors now appreciate fully the importance of
!xdequate
and careful attention to all bank business, and that
if th;
Dank should be granted permission to exercise trust powers
the
cenduct of its
eislre
trust department would not be subject to criti-

J

f




"20
11/28/33

-27-

ftin vievrof all the circumstances, the Board is prepared to
a?Prove the application of the National Bank of Tulsa for full
flauciary powers when it has been advised that action has been
taken to the satisfaction of yourself, your Executive Committee,
the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and the Comptroller of
the Currency,
as follows:
"1. That the bank has obtained an experienced and competent
trust officer not previously connected with the L;xchange Trust
C°mPfuly, the Exchange National Bank, or the Exchange Uational
Company of Tulsa.
'2. That a trust coliandttee has been selected composed only
of the directors who bre most capable and experienced in trust
matters, particularly in trust investments.
"3. ahat the bank has retained competent legal counsel experienced in trust matters.
4. That the existing vacancies on the board of directors
have been filled by experienced and competent individuals.
5. 'what adequate attention is being given on the part of the
directors and officers to placing in satisfactory condition the
laf;ge volume of criticized loans.
G. That all amounts classified as losses by the national bank
examiner in his report as of August 31, 1933, have been charged
Off or otherwise eliminated from the assets of the bank.
.
11hen satisfactory assurances covering these matters have been
cl°e
l
ved by the Board, it will grant the application for full fidutrnr. P°17ers, with the understanding that to the extent that any
ro:J''8 are taken over from the Exchange Trust Company and Exchange
b lc"nal Bank they will be confined to those which have been approved
Y the national bank examiner."
Approved.
Letter dated November 25, 1933, to hr. G. W. Bowen, President

Or

"The

by

`4-

-,dewart National Bank of Livonia", Livonia' NEW York, approved
three
tiembers of the Board, reading as follows:
-

pl.:Reference
is made to the resolution adopted by the Board of
it400tors of your
the bank's desire to surrender
bank
right to exercise the trust powers which ha
have been granted to
t by
the Federal Reserve Board.
cur The Board was advised by the office of the Comptroller of the
reneY in a letter dated August 30, 1933, that The Stewart Latic)nal Bank
of Livonia, Livonia, New York, had at that time been
(lisohar
or
ged
of „1,otherwise properly relieved in accordance with law
'
tru1 of its duties as fiduciary, with the exception of a single
Tic'in favor of the heirs of the
Philips Ross Estate.
'
Board has flow received
from the Comptroller of the Currency a




221
11/28/33

-28-

"letter under date of November 6, 1933, inclosing a certified copy
ct a certificate executed by the Clerk of the Surrogate's Court of
14
,Iv1ngston County, New York, certifying that The Stewart -143.tional
Lank of Livonia, Livonia, New York, now stands discharged and released of all liabilities as executor under the above named trust.
the circumstances, the Board understands that The Stewart NaBank of Livonia has been discharged or otherwise properly
?'elleved in accordance with law of all its duties as fiduciary, and
?.t has,
therefore, issued a formal certificate to your bank certifythat it is no longer authorized to exercise any of the fiduciary
13°vIers granted by the provisions of Section 11(k) of the Federal Reerr Act. This certificate is inclosed herewith.
In this connection, your attention is called to the fact that,
under the provisions of Section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve Act
amended, -when such a certificate has been issued by the Federal
4eserve Board to a national bank, such bank (1) shall no longer be
Oeet to the provisions of Section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve
4,t or the regulations of the Federal Reserve Board made pursuant
.vreto (2) shall be entitled to have returned to it any securities
4,11ch it may have deposited with the State or similar authorities
the
protection of private or court trusts, and (3) shall not
!-Kercise any of
the powers granted by Section 11(k) of the Federal
ieserve Act except with the permission of the Federal Reserve Board."

r

Approved.
Reply on Ilovember 23, 1933, approved by three members of the
13()Eir,ci

ot

to a memorandum dated November 7 from Lir. O'Connor, Comptroller
t-le Currency; the
reply reading as follows:
/3 "In accordance with your recoimnendation, the Federal Reserve
iirrd approves a reduction in the common capital stock of 'The
A e Eational Bank of Brockton', Brockton, nassachusetts, from
500,o00 to
[',100,000, pursuant to a plan of rehabilitation which
11"Dvide5
that the bank's capital shall be increased by the sale at
cZr °f C=0,000 par value class 'A' preferred stock to the Reconaction Finance Corporation and the sale at par of 200,000 par
preferred stock to present stockholders and others;
aridue class
aTs also that the funds released by the reduction in cornrnoll, p4;ncl
stock in the amount of ,;400,000, together with funds
pr the amount of193,000 from the bank's surplus and undivided
eints, shall be used, if the bank has not already done so, to
arici1P-Lnate estimated losses in the amount of approximately :7O,229
4p1, dePreeiation in securities in the lower grades in the amount of
ci1222,800, as classified in the report of examination
Of 1e
411a J
o bank made by a national bank examiner as of August 19, 1933,
establish a reserve for losses and depreciation in the amount

Z




222
11/28/33

-29-

"of c300,000, all as set forth in your memorandum dated November
7, 1953."
Approved.
Letter dated November 27, 1933, to LI-. O'Connor, Comptroller of
the C
urrency, approved by six merbers of the Board, reading as follows:
"In accordance with your recommendation, the Federal Reserve
Board approves a reduction in the common capital stock
of 'The
Irockton lational Bank', Brockton, :..assachusetts, from
00,000 to
20,000, pursuant to a plan of rehabilitation which provides that
the bank's
capital shall be increased by the sale at par of
5n,
par value Class A preferred stock to the Reconstruction
1'3-nonce
Corporation and the sale locally at par of :00,000 par
Class B preferred stock, and that the funds released by the
reduction in
common capital stock, together with :,300,000 from the
allk's surplus account and approximately Y10,000 from undivided
Profits and reserves, shall be used
to eliminate, if the bank has
t already done so, estimated losses and depreciation in securitetltbtheh a
grades aggregating approximately ;.550,000, and
special reserve of y300,000 against doubtful assets
„,oct depreciation in securities
in the higher grades, all as set
4 rth in
your memorandum of November 8, 1933."

j

Approved.
the

Letter dated November 27, 1933, to Ni'. O'Connor, Comptroller
of
Curr
encY, approved by six members of the Board, reading as follow's:
Bo In accordance with your recommendation the Federal
Reserve
,
tpc
.L.rd approves a reduction in the common capital stock of the
8t
National Bank of Bar Harbor', Bar harbor, Llaine, from
,000
r
P- to 50,000, pursuant to a plan of rehabilitation which
cles that the
bank's capital shall be increased by the sale at
Par
,200,000 par value preferre stock to the Reconstruction
d
in—fee Corporation
and that the funds released by the reduction
prj?Inmon capital
stock, together with ',J50,000 from undivided
tio4rilts, shall
be used to eliminate an equal amount of depreciaDietio in securities
of the lower grades, all as set forth in your
randuri
of November 14, 1933."

4

Approved.
ot the

Letter dated
November 20, 1933, to 1.:r. O'Connor, Camptroller
eurr
"cY, approved by four members
of the Board, replying to his




22L)
-30memorandum of
October 24 recomending approval by the Board of a reduction in the
capital stock of "The National hank and Trust Company of
Port
Jervis", Port Jervis, New York, from ;)195,000 to $130,000. The
reply stated
that the Board approves the proposed reduction under the
Plan submitte
d, subject to the conditions set forth in the reply. The
rebi
stated also that, in considering the plan under -which the reduccapital stock is to be effected, it was noted that no provisicn
was
,
for the elimination of depreciation in securities below the
tour
highest grades amounting to 44,967; that, in addition, there will
Iseillain in the
bank depreciation in securities of the four highest grades
41°I.Iliting to :;31,519, doubtful items aggregating .69,749, slum items
61‘4(luntillg to ,:?290,667, and a heavy investment in bank premises; and
that i4_
iS assumed
that the Comptroller has these undesirable features
itt Mind and
will require further corrections to be made in the conditicn
of the
bank whenever it becomes feasible
to do so.
Approved.
Reply on llovember 23, 1933, approved by three members of the
bou.rd
'to a memoramdum dated loveml;er 11 from Mr. O'Connor, Comptroller
of, the

L,urre
neY; the reply reading as follows:
Bo "In accordance with your recommendation, the Federal Reserve
1
d approves a reduction in the comnon capital stock of the,
yoalayette Lational
Bank of Brooklyn in Law York', Brooklyn, hew.
tLIV;' from a,450,000 to 500,000, pursuant to a plan of rehabillprovides that the bank's capital shall be increased
LZ
lpiZ-.:hat par of ;'g00,000 par value preferred stock to the
°,nstruction
Filvince Corporation; and provides also that the
IZI3 r
eleased by the reduction in common capital stock shall be
preccl.to.eliminate estimated losses aggregating /148,673.07 and dedefil,:,,tslon in lower grade securities of W.18,694.28, to absorb
a
-4-L, in
undivided profits account amounting to ,t136,586.33 and




11/28/33
-31"to establish a special reserve for depreciation and losses in
:the amount of .200,000, all as set forth in your memorandum of
november 11, 1933."
Approved.
Reply on November 23, 1933, approved by five members of the
13°ard, to a
letter dated November 10 from Lr. Newton, Federal Reserve
Agent at
Atlanta tho reply readin,:; as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of November 10, 1933,
advising of the proposed reduction in the common capital stock of
the'Savannah Bank and Trust Company of Savannah', Savannah,
Georgia,
from V700,000 to ,,
1 350,000, and the sale of '350,000 of
eaPital notes to -uhe Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and rec"
( ending that the reduction in common capital stock and the sale
°I te.pital notes be approved.
e * Since it appears from the information submitted that the
el.,11re amount of the reduction in common capital is to be used to
j.
flinate objectionable assets from the bank, and will effect a
improvement in its condition, and since the Board's coneent.to the
reduction in capital is not required by law, or the
...,(311ditions of membership applicable to the bank, the Board offers
:
4!
1 ?b Jection to the reduction in capital in the amount indicated,
c _ 1,0 the issuance of capital notes, with the understanding, of
::
.11ree, that your counsel has considered the case and is satisfied
:; to its
legal aspects, that such reduction in the common capital
11°°?z and the sale of capital notes will not result in any change
b, tile corporate existence of the bank which will affect its menin the Federal Reserve System, and that the transaction
he..”
aPProval of the Superintendent of Banks for the State of
Georgis

1

Approved.
or

Letter daLed November 21, 1933, to Er. O'Connor, Comptroller
the

CrA,ur

lOwz2

- --10Y, approved by four members of the Board, readinc; as fol-

rec

441:erence is made to your memorandum of November 15, 1933,
1141enain approval of a reduction in the conuaon capital stock
Of Z17,
14,01,C 'Lincoln
National Bank and Trust Company of Fort -i':ayne
with 4Vfle, Indiana, from 4,250,000 to U00,000, in accordance
Roe, Plan of 1ehabi1itatioT1 which provides for the salo to the
-netruction Finance Corporation of ,:/700,000 par value preferred




t3t)
Ow,ofve

11/28/33

-32-

n
QL,ock
at per and provides also for the use of the released capital funds, together with .c100,000 of funds made available by the
sale of doubtful assets to certain directors and ,93,785.49 from
the bank's surplus and undivided profits, in eliminating substandard
”sets and depreciation aggregating 4943,785.49, all as set forth
In Your memorandum dated November 150 1933.
In accordance with your recommendation and the plan submitted
.
111 connection therewith, the Federal Reserve Board approves the reduction in cammon capital stock."

Approved.
Letter dated November 27, 1933, to Lir. O'Connor, Comptroller
Of the
Currency,
approved by six members of the Board, reading as follerWs:

-L11 accordance with the recommendation of Acting Comptroller
the Federal Reserve Board approves a reduction in the common
Oat
stock of 'The Citizens National Bank of Chicago Heights',
ricago Heights, Illinois, from :,200,000 to '50,000, pursuant to
..,Plan of rehabilitation which provides that the bank's capital
;
11411 be increased by the sale at par of c)50,000 par value pretrod stock to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and that
bee fUnds released by the reduction in common capital stock shall
Inaturd to eliminate substandard assets in the amount of approxi:4
, 51 0.17,000 and to establish a surplus fund in the amount of
.),(), all as set forth in lir. Awalt's memorandum of November 21,
1933.
v

Approved.
Letter dated Eovember 27, 1933, to Mr. O'Connor, Comptroller
Of the c

urrencY, approved by six members of the Board, reading as fol101rt
z

”Ref
°1111,1e)1,14erence is made to your memorandum of November 15, 1933, rec1 Th
aPproval of a reduction in the common capital stock of
,a0e Pir6t
National Bank of Antioch', Antioch, Illinois, from
*() to 40,000, in accordance with a plan of rehabilitation
,
Ilihic :
tio-'Provides for the sale to the .-econstruction Finance Corporafor
0O0 par value preferred stock at par, and provides also
eziou 20 use of the released funds, together with funds in the
°f
.5,000 to be made available by voluntary
ontrlt)taPproximately
acgr, in eliminating substandard assets and depreciation
m
d4m egatillg aPproximately 45,000, all as set forth in your meoranilovember
15, 1933.




11/28/33
"In accordance with your recommendation and the plan submitted
in connection therewith, the Federal Reserve Board approves the reduction in common capital stock."
Approved.
Letter dated November 21, 1933, to Mr. O'Connor, Comptroller of
thee
urrency, approved by four members of the Board, replying to his
Illem°randum of October 31 recommending approval by the Board of a reduction A
44 the comon capital stock of "The Fremont County National Bank
Of canon City",
Canon City, Colorado, from 4100,000 to $50,000.

The

reP1Y stated that the Board approves the proposed reduction under the
Plan
submitted, subject to the conditions set forth in the reply. The
rspl-,
4 "ated also that, in considering the plan under which the reduction 4

'
11. the bank's common capital stock is to be effected, the Board
has noted
,
tha'13after
the application of funds, in amount of 450,000
relelleed by the

capital reduction and $10,000 taken from the reserve

Itee°114t, to the
elimination of estimated losses, substandard assets,
4nd depr
eciation in securities, there will remain in the bank a material

kount
4

of

criticized assets and securities depreciation in addition to

heaw

the
6
',PSS

Investment in banking house and furniture and fixtures in which
nati°nal bank Oxaxriiner estimates depreciation of approximately
and that the Board
has assumed that the Comptroller has these

44desirable

features in mind and that he will require further correc-

ti°113 to be
made in the condition of the bank whenever it becomes feasisolo to
do so.
Approved.
Letter dated
November 27, 1933, to Hr. O'Connor, Comptroller of
the CurrelacIr
V, approved by six members of the Board, reading as follows:




11/28/33
"In accordance with your recommendation, the Federal Reserve
Board approves a reduction in the common capital stock of 'The
City National Lank of Atchison', Atchison, Kansas, from ,100,000
t° "°,0000 pursuant to a plan of rehabilitation which provides
at the bank's capital shall be increased by the sale at par of
02000 par value preferred stock to the Reconstruction Finance
'
L orporation,
and that the funds released by the reduction in corn'non
capital stock shall be used to eliminate substandard assets in
'he amount of approximately ,;35,000 and to increase the surplus
frcount by
approximately ‘,;15,060, all as set forth in your memorandum of
November 13, 1933."
Approved.
Letter dated i‘ovember 27, 1933, to Mr. O'Connor, Comptroller
Currency, approved by five members of the 3oard, reading as fol-

It "In accordance with your recommendation, the Federal Reserve
uctrd approves a reduction in the common capital stock of 'The
niori I
Tational rank of Wichita', Achita, Kansas, from 2.00,000
t° v100,000, pursuant to a plan of rehabilitation ullich provides
61
)
.
1 t the bank's capital shall be increased by the sale at par of
000 par value
preferred stock to the Reconstruction Finance
°r ation, and that the funds released by the reduction in conalpital stock shall be used to eliminate substandard assets
sur ,
cle
preciation in the amount of )96,000, and to increase the
me 94
'11s account in the amount of )4,O00, all as set forth in your
Inor alldum
of November 13, 1933."

0

Approved.
Letter dated
Eovember 27, 1933, to
lowzt

r. O'Connor, Comptroller

durrency, approved by six members of the Board, reading as fol-

"Refer
recomlne °nee is made to your memorandum of November 13, 1933,
11iflg approval of
ct
. a rock
:
a reduction in the common cap
, 250
'The
onn4Yominz National Bank of Casper', Casper, Wyoming, from
.1rh
it
oenci ;;ot
7.01a225,000, in accordance with a plan of rehabilitation
for the sale to the Reconstruction Finance Corporaalse
_ 25,000 par value preferred stock at par, and provides
starld "r "he U20 of the released capital funds in eliminatinf; sub4rd azsets and depreciation.
ac ",
cckuance with your recommendation and the plan submitted




228
11/28/33
-353.11 connection therewith, the Federal Reserve Board approves the
reduction in common capital stock."
Approved.
Letter dated November 24, 1933, to Lir. O'Connor, Comptroller
°I' the

Currency, approved by four members of the Board, reading as

e°110ws:
"In accordance with the recommendation of Acting Comptroller
Amat, the Federal Reserve Board approves a reduction in the com:
,11 ,1(Ini capital stock of vlhe First National Bank of Fort Worth', Fort
, Texas, from 1.,100,000 to :750,000, pursuant to a plan of
reh
abilitation which provides that the bank's capital shall be in!
l'eased by the sale at par of ::;750,000 par value preferred stock
to the
Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and that the funds reteased by the reduction in common capital stock shall be
used,
,.otf,ether with 250,000 from the bank's surplus and approximately
%:63,277 from the bank's undivided profits, to eliminate substandard
,!?ts and securities depreciation in the amount of approximately
,nu6,'-77, all as set forth in LI-. Awalt's memorandum of November
1933."

Approved.
of

Letter dated November 27, 1933, to :dr. O'Connor, Comptroller
urrenoy, approved by six members of the Board, reading as fol-

accordance with the recommendation of Acting Comptroller
the Federal Reserve Board approves a reduction in the comon
capital stock of ''.1he First National hank of San Marcos', San
hall:?0,s, Texas,
from c:160,000 to 430,00O3 pursuant to a plan of re:dilatation mhich provides that the bank's capital shall beincreased
toe
tileased by the
sale at par of 40,000 par value preferred stock
oconstruction Finance Corporation, and that the funds reloe
f„-,°" by the reduction in common capital stock, together with
t;"Qs from
the sale of 1.2,000 of eliminated assets to the director8e,for
cash, shall be used to eliminate substandard assets and
?"tablish a surplus account of :,;12,000, all as set forth in Lr.
memorandum of November 17, 1933."
‘raj..t,

Approved.
Letter dated
November 27, 1933, to




r. O'Connor, Comptroller of

11/28/33

-36the currency,
approved by six members of the Board, reading as follows:
It

accordancemm
with your recommendation, the Federal Reserve
J,eard approves a reduction in the common capital stock of 'The
14erchants and Planters National Bank of Sherman', Sherman, Texas,
f?"om
500,000 to .400,000, pursuant to a plan of rehabilitation
wnich provides that the bank's capital shall be increased by the
sale at par of :,;400,000 par value preferred stock to the Reconstruction
Finance Corporation, and that the funds released by the
uction in corrrnon capital stock shall be used to eliminate subandard assets,
all as set forth in your memorandum dated November
16, 1933."

T

Approved.
Letter dated November 27, 1933, to Er. O'Connor, Comptroller
Of

the

Currency, approved by six members of the Board, reading as fol-

1.01p,m 1

"Reference is made to your memorandum of November 10, 1333 recct?ndini,; approval of a reduction in the common capital stock of
,''"0 First National Bank of Floydada', Floydada, Texas, from
'50 oon to
4_
.e25,000, in accordance with a plan of rehabilitation
•th
jlen provides for the sale to the Reconstruction Finance Corporafl°n
cif .125,000 par value preferred stock at par and provides also
for the
use of the released capital funds, together with approxitttelY
til.,030 from the bank's undivided profits, in eliminating
(e0
tandard assets and depreciation aggregating approximately
1933.30, all as set forth in your memorandum dated Lovember 10,

ii

-Ln. accordance with your recommendation and the plan submitted
4
41:4 co
nnection therewith, the Federal Reserve Board approves the
eduction in common capital stock."
Approved.
Letter dated Lovember 22, 1933, to Er. O'Connor, Cometroller
"the

Currency, approved by five members of the Board, replying to

4411tter of
iiovember 9 recommending approval by the Board of a rethe common capital stock of "The First National Bank of
Nra.
ler", Parlier,
California, from 75,000 to 50,000. The reply
8t,lt
ed that the
board approves the proposed reduction under the plan




4,1

4-13
Aft,tJ1LJ

11/28/33
tibmitted, subject to the conditions set forth in the reply.
Approved.
Letter dated November 27, 1933, to Yr. O'Connor, Comptroller
Of the Currency, approved by six members of the Board, reading as folleWs t
13 "In accordance with your recommendation, the Federal Reserve
approves a reduction in the common capital stock of the
rescenta-Canada National Bank at Lontrose', Lontrose, California,
%=,000 to 25,000, pursuant to a plan of4rehabilitation
Ithich provides that the bank's capital shall be increased by the
”le at par of
25,000 par value preferred stock to the Reconstrucen Finance Corporation, and that the funds released by the reducal°n in common capital stock shall be used to eliminate substandard
!
ii,3ets in the amount of 018,911.40 and to establish a surplus fund
he
amounj-1; of c6,000, all as set forth in your memorandum of
14°vember 11, 1933."

Z

t

Approved.

the

Letter dated November 21, 1933, to lir. O'Connor, Comptroller of
CurrencY, approved by four members of the Board, reading as follows:
11,
-)11 October 19, 1933, the Federal Reserve Board ;rote to you
ng the reduction in common capital stock of the 'Continental
„
111.°18 National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago', Illinois,
suant to a plan outlined in your memorandum to the Board dated
tx,"Ther 16, 1933. One of -the conditions under which the BatIrd's
'Pr°val vitas given was as follows:
t 'That prior to the time when such reduction is effected, the
pank's capital shall be increased by the sale for cash to the
"econstruction Finance Corporation of :•50,000,000 par value of
pireferred stock at par'.
The iloard understands however, that the preferred stock is be1ZILoffered pro rata to the present shareholders of the National
chas_i:or subscription, and that only the balance which is not pur'''cl bY them will be purchased by the Reconstruction Finance CorPeration

Z

T- .

,
11_,."1. the circumstances, the condition of the Board's
`"*.ecl above, is modified to read as follows:
That, concurrently with such reduction in common
:
86
. 0ck, the bank's capital shall be increased by the
cash of
0,000,000 par value of preferred stock at




Approved.

approval,
capital
sale for
par'."

231
11/28/33
-38Telegram dated hol)ember 25, 1933, to 1,1r. Newton, Federal Re(1.1Jre Agent at
Atlanta, approved by four members of the Board, reading
as
follows:
"Board approves application of St. Charles Bank and Trust Corn131Y, Norco, Louisiana, for original stock to be issued in
name
of St. Charles
National Bank of Norco, effective if and when
authorized
by Comptroller of the Currency to commence business.
. Board reouests that revised application be obtained and sub111tted
substantially in form of one inclosed with your letter of
"'ember 21, except that in first line of last paragraph of first
lt ? 'St. Charles National Bank' be chanLed to read 'St. Charles
and arust Company', that signature to application be that
.6t. Charles Bank and Trust Company' rather than 'St. Charles
41.tlenal Bank' and that seal of State institution rather than seal
of national
bank be affixed."

1
t

Approved.
Telegram dated November 20, 1933, to Mr. Stevens, Federal Reeerve

4

ent at Chicago, approved by four members of the
Board, reading
follolv;s:
card approves amended application First National Bank of Hampton H
a,
ampton, Iowa, for Federal reserve bank stock, and revokes
vPr°17a1 7,ranted i.ovember 8 of previous application."
Approved.
Letter dated November 23, 1933, to Mr. Peyton, Federal Reserve
'1/4ent at
Mi
nneapolis, approved by three members of the Board, stating
that
El
Preliminary examination of the application for a voting permit
11114"
authority of section 5144 of the Revised Statutes, as amended,
riaea
Y First
bank Stock Corporation, lanneapolis, Minnesota, indicates
that 4.,
wie
application should be supplemented as set forth in the letter.
Approved.
Tel
°graphic reply on November 24, 1933, approved by three merr
Of the u
oard, to a telegram dated November 23 from La.. Calkins,




.5)41

11/2v33
-39rlovernor of
the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, referring to
the B°ard's telegram of November 23 to all Federal reserve agents
CRIc
'ting a message from the President of the United States under date
Of
-uvember 22, 1933, requestin7 the cooperation of all banks in the
eountrY in cashin- pay checks received by employees of the civil works
administration. (-overnor Calkins' telegram stated that it is assumed
that
it is not contemplated that the Federal reserve banks will cash
the cv,
'Leeks referred
to for payees and that such warrants will be aceePted (3nlY in accordance with Treasury circular 176 when properly endor ea 1,
uY banks. The
reply read as follow:
of "Your wire
November 23. Treasury checks received by employees
ion,fle civil works administration should be handled by Reserve
-s'"':8 in same manner as other Treasury checks."
Approved.
Reply on November 20, 1933, approved by five members of the
to
letters dated September 28 and November 3 from Mr. Case, Fed-

oral .0
'
Lee"ve Agent at New York; the reply reading as follows:

"leeA.
4 -1Pu is acknowledged of your letter of September 28, 1933,
'ncl; a copy of a letter received by you from the ManufacturO'5 ?c4
Tr
19
ust Company, Now York, 1.-.ow York, under date of September 25,
Tr '' together with a copy of a brief prepared by counsel for the
ofILItC°11PanY, relating to the necessity for publishing reports
ceioertain
corporations as affiliates of the Trust Company. Rewit„!t 18 also ackalowledged of your letter of November 3, 1933,
a '" r eference to
the subject of your earlier letter and inclosing
'Copy
°f a letter from the Trust Company dated October 30, 1933.
ra, Jae letters from
the Trust Company and the brief submitted
ril?e the
question whether the Huron Holding Corporation is an af13ah lte within the statutory definition of Section 2(b) of the
r(;.; 11k,7 Act of 1933.
It is explained that this corporation was
oala °
r,d at the time
of the merger of Chatham Phenix National Bank
linutrust Company and
lanufacturers Trust Company in order to
zlate certain doubtful assets for the benefit of the then
'floldersof the memergingnr banks. ahe brief points out that




rib

233
11/28/33

-40-

"nether the shares of its stock nor outstanding receipts for its
deposited shares are 'tied' to shares of stock of the Yianufacturers Trust
Company and that the majority stockholders of the Huron
Holding Corporation may no longer be majority stockholders of the
Trust Comoany. If the argument is correctly understood, the only
reason which is given for holding that the Huron Holding Corporation does not fall within the language of the definition is that
the registered
holders of a majority of the shares of the lb:emufacturers Trust Company may not control, directly or indirectly,
the Huron
Holding Corporation, inasmuch as certificates of stock
and receipts
for stock may have been transferred without a corresponding transfer on the books of record, so that the persons owning the 'beneficial' interest in the stock are not necessarily the
Persom mho appear as the owners of record. The situation mould
em to be not different from that which arises in the usual case.
nt iS always necessary to determine whether as a question of fact,
-11 organization falls within one or more of the categories enumerZ ed in the statutory definition. The possibility or probability
.nat stock certificates have been transferred without correspond.221e; transfers
of record may increase the difficulty of determining
'
4.?e question of fact, but the question remains and it is a quesn which the Federal Reserve board is not able and should not be
ailed upon to determine in the first instence.
171-th the possible exception of the Huron holding Corporation,
it:
4
J lete
ir
eiri.tood that all of' the companies named in the letter and
are admitted to be affiliates within the language of
,_!,statutory definition, although, for various reasons, it is contended that they
are not the kinds of affiliates intended to be incial,
l d within the scope of the definition, or that, because of peICar circumstances, the publication of their reports is either
th,ecessary or mould prove to be misleading. The reasons urged for
pa-'11. conclusion
follow three lines of thought and divide the com105
nerned into that nunber of groups. In the first group are
?O
Panies each
iti
of mhich is a subsidiary of a corporation which is
1.4idfEtsaftlf.liate of the Manufacturers Trust Company. It is
1
report will be published for the intermediate corporaporationt, makingit unnecessary to publish the reports of that cor- subsidiaries. The second main group of corporations
consi
tns of companies, which like the C. P. • Realty Corporation
for
Gotham National Bank Building, Inc., appear to exist only
locts e purpose of liquidating real estate, or which represent
co4:'which have been defaultod
or charged off. Certain of the
1„1ies in this group are referred to as 'nominee' corporations.
both :
to thkefroxtare
subdivided into those companies which are indebted
cklice of
. Company and those which are not, although the signifithis distinctio ,, is not explained.
Aot"'
o"iltie definition of an 'affiliate' in Section 2(b) of the Banking
Pedern,19
,
33 is applicable to those provisions of Section 9 of the
Reserve Act which require a member bank to publish the

r




234
11/28/33
tt
reports of its affiliates. Section 9 goes further and specifically provides that, for the purposes of the paragraph containing
this requirement, the tern 'affiliate' shall include holding comPE‘nY affiliates as well as other affiliates. The purpose for
wlijoh a corporation was organized or is existing has no place in
tne definition.
There is no provision that the reports of a certaln corporation which is an affiliate within the language of the
tatutory definition need not be published because the corporation
•ls merely
a nominee company, or because it represents a charged°ff loan, or because it is the subsidiary of an affiliate as to
'
lAllch a report will be published. The law does not raise an ex?ePtlon due to peculiar circumstances of any such character and
it does
not vest the Federal Reserve Board with the duty or privilege of so
doing.
It is suggested in the brief that, inasmuch as the Act prolades a
specific penalty for failure to make reports and does not
pi escribe a
penalty for failure to publish them, such omission in,cL
, eatcs that the Federal reserve authorities have a substantial
9.scretion in
deciding whether or not a given report should be pubbIshed. The argurent, however, is suggestive as to what might have
enidone rather than convincing as to the proper construction of
e
r l_am.
as enacted, and it is the opinion of the Board that with
oefsPect to companies which are affiliates when tested by the letter
e_ the statutory definition, the Board has no discretion to raise
'
eetions to the mandatory and inclusive provisions requiring the
Pub
l:lcation of reports.
a, :the third
of the three groups of organizations referred to
Ii°°03 includes only one of the companies named in the brief, the
17,17 Lrokerage Company, Inc. with respect to this company it is
nad

1

4

ILa
It,this nufacturers on June 30 owned the entire capital stock of
corporation, but since that date has sold it.'
pa,48 is suggested by the statement quoted, Harvey Brokerage ComTr-1;:
Y . Inc., has ceased to be an affiliate of the Manufacturers
wol" C°111Pany within the letter of the statutory definition, there
pall'd seem to be no
reason compelling the Manufacturers Trust Gemto Publish reports of the Brokerage Company which are compiled
to ,
°12, a* date subsequent to the date upon which the Company ceased
;;;',euPY the status of an affiliate of the Trust Company.
ter 41°I. Your convenience in transmitting the substance of this lethere L0 the
Lanufacturers Trust Company, a carbon copy is sent you
It should be pointed out to the Trust Company that, as
expi
arid aye suggested in your letter of September 23, 1933, statements
.riatory of the actual relationship between the Trust Company
affiliates may be included in the reports which are pubin order
Order to avoid those misleading statements and suggest0
putlielNhj
:ch the Trust Company regards as a probable result of
the




Approved.

„5
11128/33

-42-

Telegraphic reply on November 21, 1933, approved by five mombers of

the Board, to a telegram dated November 16 from Er. Neuton,

Federal
Reserve Agent at San Francisco; the reply reading as follows:
. "Retel November 16. Limited voting permit mailed First SecurltY Uorporation of Ogden on November 17 and corporation notified
bY telegram. Board reluctant to issue limited permits because of
duPlication of work and delay resulting therefrom as well as
other reasons. In this case, however, Board will consider application in connection with Utah banks as application for limited
Permit as requested your telegram but cannot give application
even when so considered immediate attention due to many other
urgent cases awaiting consideration.”
Approved.
Telegraphic reply on November 23, 1933, approved by three
tlerabers of the
Board, to a telegram dated November 18 from Er. Newton,
Pectoral

Reserve Agent at San Francisco, stating that Mr. T. A. Work

individually owns control of the First National Bank, Pacific Grove,
ealifc)rnia, the
Hollister National Bank, Hollister, California, and
the
First
National Bank, Monterey, California; that both the Hollister
bank
arid the
Pacific Grove bank have voted for Class B directors of the
Federal
Reserve Bank of San Francisco; and that advice is requested as
to
whether the
reserve Lank is correct in its interpretation that, in
l'iet7 of
the
provisions of section 4 of the Federal Reserve Act, Yr.
743rk will
be
construed as a holding company affiliate and therefore
()111Y °no of
the member banks may participate in the nomination or elect. 11 Of di
rectors of the Federal reserve bank. The reply read as folIowa:

"In bsence of pertinent facts not revealed in your telegram
Novo
18, Board is of opinion that T. A. Work individually is
riot rtel,L,er
vuote
corporation, business trust, association, or other




"36
11/22/33
-43.imilar organization Unquote and therefore not a holding company
affiliate as that term is defined in section 2(o) Banking Act of
1933 and that designation by him of member bank to participate in
nomination or election of Reserve bank directors is therefore unneeessary.ft

Approved.
Reply on November 24, 1933, approved by five members of the
Eloar,a, -co a

letter dated November 21 from Nr. Downs, Assistant Federal

Reser70 Agent
at New York; the reply reading as follows:
"In compliance
boar 21,
lIew York1933, the
City, an
which it may
file

with the recommendation in your letter of NovemBoard grants to the Manufacturers Trust Company,
extension of time to December 1, 1933, within
the reports of its affiliates."
Approved.

Reply on November 24, 1933, approved by four members of the
board
'to a letter dated October 10 from Lir. A. II. Marble, President
or Ihe c"ock
Growers hational hank, Cheyenne, ayoming; the reply readas follows
I
,IolAr letter of
October 10, 1933, addressed to the Comptroller
the
has Loon referred to the Federal Reserve board
Currency,
4or repl
y.
„,4

Lat7From your letter, the hoard understands that the Stock Growers
st l
e,
)
ic nal Company is a securities company and an affiliate of The
Growers Lational Bank, and that you are under the impression
bj
. hrowe
Banking Act of 1933 requires the bank to dispose of this
"17 'January 1st next'. You anticipate that the bank will
bc'3111e
to find a
purchaser for the business by that date, and
You de
be
to
whether the affiliation may be lawfully
advised
cotc
'
lecire
il;,
Z
efIe
January 1, 1934, provided that the company refrains
f1:80/1:111tr
any new business after such date and is liquidated
0n as
practicable thereafter.
elearliZievi of your reference to 'January 1st next', it is not
that "mat Provisions of law you have in mind, but it is assumed
of 10Kour
inquiry has reference to Section 20 of the Banking Act
16, 19 , 17hich provides in effect that, after one year from June
scrib
no member bank shall be affiliated in any manner deatione
'
in Section 2(b) of that Act with 'any corporation, associ'business trust or other similar organization engaged

4




237
11/28/33
-44II
'Principally in the issue, flotation, underwriting, public sale
or distribution at wholesale or retail or through syndicate participation of stocks, bonds, debentures, or other securities.' Although section 20 clearly requires each member bank to divorce
anY affiliate which may be engaged in the business of a securities
comPany on or after one year from June 16, 1933, it is the opinion
of the
Board that the provisions of that section do not require a
member bank to divorce an affiliate which shall have been engaged
in the business of a securities company prior to June 16, 1934,
unless such organization is actually engaged in such business on
that date or
thereafter engages in any such business. Accordingly,
it would
seem that it will not be unlawful under Section 20 of the
Act for The Stock Growers rational Bank to continue its affiliation
ith the
Stock Growers National Company from and after June 16,
134
9.p, provided that the latter company is not engaged in any kind
;
:
),busilless described in section 20 on that date, and that it does
ok,"thereafter engage in any such business.
n this connection, however, your
attention is directed to
rctlon 5139 of
the Revised Statutes, which provides that, after
cs ,1e year from
!
June 16, 1935, no certificate representing the stock
a_ anY nwtional banking association shall represent the stock of
Oh
corporatior (with exceptions not here pertinent), nor
the
ownership, sale or transfer of any certificate representStock of any such association be conditioned in any manner
reatsoover upon the ownership, sale or
transfer of a certificate
baaesenting the stock of any other corporation, except a member
such
°I.
' course, The Stock Growers Lational Bank must comply with
o
_provisions of Section 5139.
Act Your
attention is also directed to Section 32 of the Banking
a
1933,
and for your information there is inclosed herewith
copY of
deal
the Board's Regulation R, relative to relationships with
ers in securities under that section."
Approved.
Reply on
November 20, 1933, approved by five members of the
Board, to
letters dated September 13 and Lovember 1 from flr. Norris,
Gcverzor of
the Federal
Reserve IstInk of Philadelphia; the reply read11). 413 f°11.oym t
tt14_ 40ference
is made to your letters of September 13, 1933, and
11,4:raber
-'
-1
933,
trenrve
requesting an interpretation of the Federal
Loard's Regulation Q. I regret exceedingly that the exan 2
e
f ressure of other
matters of urgent importance has prevented
--"
der co
ill
nsideration by the Board of the questions presented
Your
letter of the former date.




"38
11/28/33

-45-

"You refer to the Board three questions submitted to you by
11, Valli= T. Gest, Chairman of the Board of the FidelityPhiladelphia Trust Company
and Chairman of the Clearing House ,
Committee of
the Philadelphia Clearing House. Mr. Gest requests
to be
advised, in the first place, whether the printed notice
contained in the
passbook issued by the Fidelity-Philadelphia
/rust Company in connection with its Savings Department complies
with Section
V(a)(2) of Regulation Q. Such notice provides that
deposits and interest thereon will be paid after thirty days'
uritten notice but that the Savings Department may, in its discretion, waive this requirement of notice and make payment upon
n?tice of twoweeks or less. The Board is of the opinion that,
since notice in
writing of not less than thirty days nay be required before withdrawal, the fact that withdrawals may
be allowed
upon notice of less than thirty days does not prevent the deposit
.s1bOect to such withdrawal
from being a 'savings deposit' within
he
Illeanin of the definition contained in Regulation Q. It
Should be
noted, however, that the Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust
eonT
allY must comply with the provisions of Section 19 of the Fedai- Reserve Act that no member bank shall waive any requirement
s 1.1etiee before payment of any savings deposit except as to all
1?-;1111Ss deposits having the same requirement, and that it must
'14:emise comply with the provisions of Section VI
of Regulation Q
on t;this
subject.
It is asked, in the second place, whether loans may be made
;II the
assignment of the whole or part of a savings fund account.
(3
4,ctflote 10 to Section VI(d) of Regulation Q prohibits the making
,
a.loan to the owner
of a savings deposit for the purpose of
w31./
11g any of the requirements of that section. A loan may be
"ln the prohibition contained
in this footnote irrespective of
T:et,her it is
secured by an assignment of the savings deposit it0
, or by other collateral
or by no collateral at all, provided
ofel
2 lean is in fact made for the purpose of evading the provision
itsL-he
regulation. Each case must be determined on the basis of
ett.eval particular circumstances. The fact that a loan is secured
co
,
lrelY or in part by an assignment of a savings deposit may, of
1711;
;
1 seseonstitute a circumstance to be considered
in determining
tiela
,
her the loan Was made for the purpose of evading the requireSection VI of the regulation.
ruln (lth respect to Id.. Gest's third question, it is noted that a
any cf the Philadelphia Clearing House authorizes the waiver of
dia.
; equired
notice of withdrawal on accounts subject to thirty
tin
:rInotice,
or more, and armits the withdrawal of unmatured
provided the rate of interest on such withdrawals
doe,a Period of
at least thirty days prior to such withdrawals
than Ilc) exceed the rate applicable to deposits payable on less
418,virithirty d
ays' notice. Even thou ll notice of withdrawal of
/le
os deposits is not required by a member bank, it is only
eel3sarY that the interest paid thereon shall not exceed the

J




239
11/28/33
-46'
maximum rate prescribed by Section V(c) of Regulation Q, provided the provisions of Section VI of the regulation, already
120ted, are fully
complied with. Your attention is called to the
ract, however, that Section IV of the regulation prohibits the
1.3ayment in any case of time deposits (as distinguished from 'sav1
21gs deposits') before their maturity. It is suggested, therefore, that the
reference to the withdrawal of unmatured time dePosits be eliminated from the rule in question."
lipproved.
Reply on Lovember 20, 1933, approved by five members of the
oard, to a
letter dated June 28 fram
John - J.0 Sanders, Treasurer
of the Cl
inchfield Railroad Company, Erwin, Tennessee; the reply readas
follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of June 28, 1933, addressed
to the
Comptroller of the Currency and referred to the Federal Rer79 Board for reply. The Board regrets that due to the pressure
;-;.Litother natters of an urgent nature, it has not had an opportuYvt° Cive earlier consideration to your inquiry.
2
°u inquire whether the payment of interest on deposits of
ti;;Z2 of your company in national banks under contracts, providing
stb, such banks will pay interest on daily balances, is pornisy_ le
subsequent to the enactment of the Glass-Steagall bill.
11.state that the contracts do not provide for any certain term
l'hich payment of interest shall be made, but the intention
they should apply to all daily balances thereafter main`'EJaled.
48 "Under the
provisions of jection 19 of the Federal Reserve Act
batrended by section 11 (b) of the Banking Act of 1933, a member
IllaY not pay interest on a deposit payable on demand except
"
cordance with a contract entered into in good faith prior to
jull
qui;2,6
'1933 and in force on that date; and a member bank is retO eliminate from any such contract any provisions for the
zill
oTent of interest on deposits payable on demand as soon as posoer4.0.consistently with its contractual obligations. Deposits of
butlln kinds are exeepted from the provisions
of law in questions
woiadePosits of the kind which are the subject of your inquiry
aPpear to come within any of the exceptions mentioned in
the
i statute.

n

4

uch as you did not submit copies of the contracts referred
to la.ib
tioll °ye, the Federal Reserve Board is unable to answer your quests a 8Pe oifically; and although your letter does not so state, it
able81.1med that the deposits to which you refer are deposits pay°11 demand. In deciding whether a valid and binding contract




240
11/28/33

-47-

"for the payment of interest exists, the determinative factor
18 whether the bank in question is under a legal obligation to
Pay interest on deposits in accordance with the terms of a bona
fide agreement in force on June 16, 1_33. Accordingly, if the
Igreement to pay interest on any such deposit was entered into
11:1 good faith and was in force on such date and is the valid and
binding obligation of the bank in question, interest may be paid
on such deposit in accordance with the terms of the agreement.
On the other
hand, if the agreement in respect to the payment of
interest on
such deposit is not a valid and binding contract, or
14 it is subject to cancellation or modification at the option
of the bank or without liability on the part of the bank, the
men
member
bank may not continue to pay interest on such deposit
11111 11 is payable on demand.
In this connection, it is quite likely that the contracts to
'
lleh you refer, in that they do not provide for any certain
term during
which payment of interest on daily balances shall be
1.:”.e, are subject to cancellation or modification by the banks
Iuhout
excepted
by the liability and are, therefore, of a character not
statute. If this is the case, it became the duty of such
national banks as soon as possible after June 16, 1933, to take
ern.action as was necessary to terminate the contracts or to
111114Rte any provisions for the payment of interest on deposits
Y?.1010 on demand. No interest may be paid by such banks on dejt which
have been received under the contracts and which are
1:c!.,fab1e on demand for
any period after the eVfective date of modification
of the contracts."

2

Approved.
Reply on I;ovember 20, 193, approved by five members of the
1c)41.d, to a
letter dated October 25 from Mr. I. R. Alter, Executive
Vies
-President of the First ilational Bank, Grand Isla:id, ::ebraska; the
readinz as follows:
dr_ le ererence
is made to your letter dated October 25, 1933, adto the Comptroller of the Currency, which has been rered
to the Federal Reserve Board for reply. You state that
pa
tent of a time certificate of deposit, dated June, 1933, is4114 ,by your bank, payable to the depositor or to the survivor,
'eft with your bank to protect funeral expenses, has been reLle t
the e`4 oy the survivor for the purpose of securing funds to meet
funeral expenses of the depositor. Although your inquiry is
;„sPeeifio, it is assumed that payment of such certificate has
T requested prior to the date of its maturity.
Section 19
of the Federal Reserve Act, as =ended, provides

Z̀

t




241_
11/28/33

-48o.
In part that no member bank shall pay any time deposit before
iLs maturity. The language of the statute is explicit and does
not authorizethe Board to make an exception for any purpose.
t. .in connection with the making of a loan against a time Ger,
lfleat,e of deposit by a member bank, your attention is invited
u? the footnote on page G of the Board's Regulation Q, which prolades as follows;
'The making of a loan to the owner of a time deposit in a
menber bank by such bank, or by any other bank, person, partnership or corporation in accordance with any agreement,
arrangement or understanding with such bank, for the purpose
of evading any prohibition of Sec. IV above, will, to the
extent of such loan, be deemed to be a payment of such deposit
ln violation of such prohibition; and, in any case in which a
?Tear' is made to the owner of a time deposit in a member bank
0Y such bank or in accordance with any agreement, arrangement
or understandint- with such bank, the member bank must be pref
Pared to show clearly that it was made in good faith and not
,,or the purpose of evading any such prohibition'.
A eoPY of Regulation Q is inelosed for your information."
Approved.
l ePly on November 24, 1933, approved by five merdeers of the

4ctrd,

-0 a letter
dated November 15 from Mr. A. D. Shackelford, ExecIltiye v.
lee President of the National Bank of Wilson, North Carolina;
the
'Ply reading
as follows:
in "
eference is made to your letter dated November 15, 1933,
whether your bank would be permitted to anticipate pay'
de
of certain certificates of deposit which were issued to the
BallrisltOrs in settlement of their claims against the First National
eel:.nd the Wilson Trust and Savings Bank. You state that the
it .11 loate5 in question become due on January 15, 1934, and that
peals the intention of your bank, if permission is granted by the
'
1 111 ReserveB
Board, to pay such
' certificates on November 15,
1933.
'11,eotion

19 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, provides
1(/
. member bank shall pay any time deposit before
11.1.b!::ttuzno
The language of the statute is specific and does
Ac. authorize
the Board to make any exception for any purpose.
not(TdillGlY, the certificates of deposit to which you refer may
be Paid
prior to the date of their maturity."
Approved.
Reply on November 27, 1933, approved by six members of the




11/28/33

49

d, to a letter dated November 22 from :Jr. Downs, Assistant Federal- Reserve Agent at New York; the reply reading as follows:
, "In compliance with the recommendation you make in your leter of
I:ovember 22, the Central hanover Bank and Trust Company,
i2e17 York City is hereby (-)ranted an extension of time to :ovember
48 mithin which to submit the report of its deposits on Schedule
'Qt ."

Approved.
Letter dated November 21, 1933, to the Federal reserve agents
at all

Federal reserve banks, approved by four members of the Board,

reltdinz as
follows:
oection IV(e) of Regulation R, dealing with the provisions
Z71. 17eetion 32 of the Banking Act of 1933, one of the factors which
be considered in determining whether the issuance of a permit
'1-41 te compatible with the public interest is stated as follows:
'Ilether the proposed relationship will have any undesirable
effect upon the member bank's financial condition, its credit
or
or its policies in dealing mith its
ti nahere appears to be some likelihood that, in answering quest.° 8 411Mbered I and 4 on Fern' 99c, sufficient detail will not be
,ven to p nor.
,It the Board to determine whether or not the business
of the
, dealer in securities customarily includes the undemriting,
tr°tation and distribution of securities or participations in such
thtetinactions, and whether the customary business dealings between
17144.1!lember bank and the dealer involve securities in the underflotation or distribution of which the dealer has been
pi;ele,ted. It is, accordingly, requested that, in submitting ape4tlone to the hoard involving Section 32, you advise the Eoard
re,
these matters in each case."
Approved.
Telegram dated November 23, 1933, to the Federal reserve agents
RI: (Ill Federal
reserve banks, approved by four members of the Board,
ac fofl
"Ixl co nnection
zerve
with applications of directors of Federal r?-.
proh.l oanks or branches for permission to serve other banks within
3-jit1ons of
Section BA of Clayton Act it is not necessary for




243
11/28/33
fl,
zederal reserve bank or branch to submit statement on Form 94a;
but Federal reserve agent should submit information as to the
extent to which other banks covered by application have used
credit facilities of Federal reserve banks, as to applicant's
record of attendance at directors' meetings, whether he has
served as member of executive, discount or other committee of
Foederal reserve bank or branch and whether he is regarded in
er respects as a desirable director of Federal reserve bank or
b
ranch."
Approved.
Letter dted :lovember 23, 1933, to £r. Williams, Federal Reserve Agent
at Cleveland, approved by three members of the Board,
reacling as
follows:
,c,,:Reference is
made to Mr. Fletcher's letter of Lovember 13,
regarding the services of three directors of branches of
T(?Ilr bank who are serving at the same time as directors of na.ti(Tal banks and State banks.
in view of the fact that a Federal reserve bank is a bank
A
or
-zed or operatins under the laws of the United States', the
:
0:
a director of a Federal reserve bank, or of one of its
m'
01
;
1:
17i
a director of any corporation coming v4ithin the pro11Ditions of
Section CA, will be prohibited after January 1, 1934,
by the n
rr°vizions of Section 8A unless permit has been issued
nrins such service.
is, Az you are of course aware, the Board is not authorized to
permiL covering the service of more than three banking
ItstitutiQns comin - within the Prohibitions of the Clayton Act.
ar"noted that two of the directors referred to in your letter
13
. 1117.1t,; more than three institutions which apparently cone
prohibitions of the Clayton Act; and it will, accordnecessary for such directors to cease to serve all but
three
Re
such institutions. In this connection see Section V(a) of
gul4tion L."
Approved.
En

Reply on November 23, 1933, approved by five members of the
a letter
dated November 16 from Lir. Sterling 1emll of

qUire,

ariders

Re

Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio, counsel for the Federal

Bank of
Cleveland; the reply reading as follows:




)
44
11/28/33

-51-

"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of November 16, 1933,
to Lir• ilYatt, in which you state that your office, at the request
of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, has prepared an opinion
holding that Section SA of the Clayton Act does not prohibit one
the directors of that bank from serving at the some time as a
director of a Pennsylvania building and loan association which
°ooasionally makes loans to its own shareholders, secured by its
°I'm stock. You state that your opinion was based upon the Board's
let er of
September 11, 1933 (X-7584).
Before transmittin; your opinion to the Federal Reserve Bank,
ye ask to
be advised whether the Board's letter' of November 10,
7677), should be regarded as qualifying or overruling the
(1
e%sion contained in the Board's letter of September 11, 1933.
,., It is of course possible tat
a
in enacting Section BA Congress
fz:lo not have
in mind loans by a manufacturing corporation to its
vimPl
,?Yees, secured by its own stock; but it does not seem that the
vrilut.; of the Sectioa is such as to leave room for a construction
ich vould exclude such loans. The stock of the manufacturing
,corporation is evidently stock of precisely the kind referred to
1 - t he phrase 'stock or bond collateral'.
10 °11. the other hand, it appears that the stock of a building and
acall association is issued merely as a part of the plan for the
:
0 1114.1,11ation of the funds of members under which such associations
tf
a-race. The loan on the stock is, therefore, merely a part of
Ete!,Plall Pursuant to which the stock itself is issued and the transfel'.104, therefore,
appears to be of a different kind from that
to in Section BA.
,,ardlhe letter
of September 11, 1033, should therefore not be re" "as altered by the letter of November 10, 1933."
Approved.
Reply on November 27,
1933, approved by six members of the
13°ard, to a
letter dated november 16 from 1,:r. hoxton, Federal Reserve
at 1Z1.

ond; the reply reading as follows:
lifter
vihich erence
is made to your letter of November 16, 1933, in
oisTissot(1!It7;t one of the Class A directors of your bank
another bank has sumested that he should not
ForIl
rluired to fill out and submit an application on the Board's
tu
for a permit under the Clayton Act to serve the two in1 , tionG.

t

appier°ful considerfttion has been given to the matter and it
8 that, since the Act places upon the Board the responsibility 0,
c01134.determining whether or not the issuance of a permit will be
shoia2-1)1e with the public interest, the filing of an application
'I be required
in cases of the kind to which you refer. It




"45
11/28/33
-52"doos not appear to be necessary, however, in connection with an
aPplication involving the service of a director of a Federal ReServe Bank or branch to include a statement of the Federal Reserve Bank or branch on Form 94a, and, in this connection, reference is made to
the Board's telegram of November 23, 1933, Trans.
Lo. 1
915."
Approved.
Telegraphic

reply on November 20, 1933, approved by five mem-

bers
ofthe Board, to a telegram dated November 13 from Jr. Robert S.
1)arker,
counsel for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, with regard
to the
question ac to whether the Board can grant permits to serve as
a director of a
national bank and at the same time as a director of a
L:crris plan bank
or similar institution making loans on stock or bond

e°11aterca. The reply read as follows:
"Your .
tut.
wire 13. Section 8A of Clayton Act applies to any instiialarri making loans on stock or bond collateral but, in the few
or &noes in which question has been presented, :,:orris Plan banks
under laws of particular States have heretofore been con;
ed tbarik.2, within meanin of Section 8, and in such cases perh°°uld be issued. Board has not ruled generally on question
!
e 7 all Morris Plan banks are 'banks' within meaning of Sec0. With regard to 'installment stock', Board is without sufa °lent informaUon to state definitely whether situation would be
bng°us to loans made by building and loan associations secured
s"
r own stock, but if transaction is essentially similar,
am° Principle& might be applied."
Approved.
ReplY 011 November 23, 1933, approved by four members of the
t° a
lettor dated November 13 from Lr. 1\ewton, Federal Reserve
/t ellt at 4
tlanta; the reply reading as follows:
re, “ucelpt

is acknowledged of your letter of November 13, 1933,
r4rding the service of Li-. E. i4. Lane of Jacksonville as a diof tr andAr officer of three naLional banks and as a director
You --e Jacksonville branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
Ilre correct in concludins that the Board is authorized to is4 Permit coverinr the service of not more than three banking




‘-.14
11/28/33
-53o.
institutions and that, therefore, if Mr. Lane continues to serve
!s a director of the Jacksonville branch, he cannot be authorized
!do serve at the same time as a director or officer of more than
tao national
banks. In this connection, see Section V(a) of Regulation L."
,Ipproved.
Reply on November 24, 1933, approved by four members of the
B°ard, to a
letter dated November 17 from Yr. F. M. Farris, Executive
Vice
-President of the Third National Bank, Nashville, Tennessee; the
reply

reading as follows:

"1 have received your letter of November 17, 1933, regarding
"he question whether I]r. C. A. Craig and Mr. C. R. Clements, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Executive Vice-President, re:Peetively, of the National Life and Accident Insurance Company,
'
sll,eentinue as directors of your bank after January 1, 1931.
L. gihen you
were in Washington, you stated that the National
cif° and Accident Insurance Company occasionally makes loans seed
by stock or bond collateral. In the circumstances, the sore.of these
gentlemen would come within the prohibitions of
jectl°n 8A of the Clayton Act, and the question which you raise
,therefore, whether
the Federal Reserve Board is authorized
1 Issue permits
coverinr, the services in question. This matter
S under
consideration when you were in Eashin:ton, but the Board
ths 11°1v reached the conclusion that the provisions of Section 8 of
oriT Clayton Act which authorize the Board to issue permits refer
boj,,to b ankinginstitutions of certain classes, and that the
1s, accordil,gly, without authority to issue permits invo1vr61at1 onships between naLional banks and non-banking orc;aniza,
tiuo
t40-e yhich come within the prohibitions of Section 8A. Of course,
res
e is true with respect to relationships between Federal
pra
:
Iiive banks and non-bankinr, organizations which come within the
01,- ;:g1.t114f Section 8A since Federal reserve banks are 'organized
under the lam of the United States'.
e1
,1f3 You know, Section 8A refers to any corporation which 'shall
nlai,
1c)ans of the kind described; and that section, therefore,
doc;,
4 e'4 not
refer to the business which may have been transacted by
in the past, but refers only to the business transacted
after January
1, 1934, the effective date of the section.
dire°f°re, the prohibitions of Section 8A are inapplicable to a
or eTr of a national bank who shall serve as a director, officer,
of a
aeclI
which, in the past, has made loans
by*stock corporation
make
or bond collateral, if such corporation shall
40 loans of
such character after January 1, 1934. However, if

Z
,Z

Z

The:T;T




247
11/28/33

ft

the corporation shall make such loans after January 1, 1934,
Section 8A will forbid the service of a director, officer, or emPloyee of a
national bank or of a Federal reserve bank as a director, officer, or employee of such a corporation; and, if the
?orporation is not a banking corporation, the Board is not authorized to
issue a permit covering such service."
Approved.
Reply on November 27, 1933, approved by six members of the
t° a letter dated November 18 from Mr. Newton, Federal Reserve
AZent at
'Jan Francisco; the reply reading as follows:
ft,
iteference is made to your letter of bovember 18, 1933, regard11:1G the
applicability of Section 8A of the Clayton Act to the serd.2 of /Ir. Andrew -elch as a director of your bank and as Presi_:" of V:elch
Company. In view of the fact that 1.e1ch & Company
es loans secured by stock or bond collateral, you conclude that
oe.?ti°n BA is applicable to his service and that the Board is 'Athol
"
, authority to grant him a permit. As is shown by Section V(a)
1„..110Gulation L, this conclusion is correct, with the result that
'1"0111. Welch will
nut be authorized to serve as a director of your
and as President of aelch (v.:, Company after January 1, 1934,
if
Company shall make loans secured by stock or bond collate41ch
ral after
that date."

r

Approved.
Rnni
-z--y on November 20, 1933, approved by five members of the
Board
tn
3

a

letter dated September 7 from Mr. Newton E. Anderson, Los

Ca
lifornia; the reply reading as follows:
ft v
Ge J-eur letter of September 7, 1933, addressed to the Attorney
the United States has been referred to the Federal Re-'
serve B
Board for reply. You request to be advised whether a Fedoral
b al reserve
bank note is an obligation only of the Federal reserve
issuing such note or whether it is also an obligation for
thcch the Treasury of the United States would be responsible in
n eye
. nt that the Federal reserve bank could not respond.
Act Illth respect to such notes, Section 13 of the Federal Reserve
amended provides in part as follows:
Upon the deposit -with the Treasurer of the United States,
(a)
of any direct obligations of the United States or (b) of
:
1 !=s, drafts, bills of exchange, or bankers' acceptances
a
-- 112
under the provisions of this Act, any Federal reserve




.4 :I)4

11/28/33

-55-

bank making such deposit in the manner prescribed by the
Secretary of the Treasury shall be entitled to receive from
the Comptroller of the Currency circulating notes in blank,
duly registered and countersigned. ;4hen such circulating
!otes are issued against the security of obligations of the
United States, the amount of such circulating notes shall be
equal to the face value of the direct obligations of the United
6tates so
deposited as security; and, when issued against the
security of notes, drafts, bills of exchange and bankers' acceptances acquired under the provisions of this Act, the amount
thereof shall be equal to not more than 90 per cent of the esvalue of such notes, drafts, bills of exchange and
bankers' acceptances so deposited as security. Such notes
Slall be the obligations of the Federal reserve bank procuring
"irie same, shall be in form prescribed by the Secretary of the
,
P?asurY, shall be receivable at par in all parts of the
uluted States for the same purposes as are national bank notes,
azd shall be redeemable in lawful money of the United States
Oh
presentation at the United States Treasury or at the bank
cf issue.'
sm "It is the policy of the Federal Reserve Board not to express
ariePinlon upon any question of law unless such question has
n or is likely to arise in a particular case. In the circumtinces, therefore, the Board does not feel that it is in a posih
express itself with reference to your question. It is
s40d, however,
that the above quoted excerpt from the Federal ReAct may furnish the information which you desire."
Approved.
ReplY on November 23, 1933, approved by five members of the
13c3ard' t° a letter dated November 13 from Lir. L. S. Whetstone, Tacoma,
'ItLv,hirictorl,

requesting to be advised whether he is doing anything wrong

tlakinc s
tatements over the radio that postal savinF,s deposits are
thkn
4_ .17

deposits in banks and building and loan associations.

read as

The

follows:

,
dre,Ilecelpt is acknowledged of your letter of Lovember
13 adre
'
30d to 'U. S. Federal Reserve Bank', Washington, L). C., in
%.
;
/ c1 t° statements made by you in radio broadcasts.
whi:
1
1 8 it does not appear that the determination of the questions
eo c'L you ask
regarding these statements is 'within the authority
tElk,(5fred upon the Federal Reserve Board by law, it cannot under- ") express any opinion regarding them."




Approved.

Q

249
11/28/33
-56-Reply on Lovemter 27, 1933, approved by six members of the
to a letter dated November 23 from Er. Williams, Federal hoServs

Agent at Cleveland; the reply reading as follows:

"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of hovember 23, 1933,
d its inclosures, in regard to an advertisement published by
pe Peoples Savings Bank Company, Delta, Ohio, a member bank, reecting
1, 1934. the insurance of its deposit accounts beginning January

n

r

"rihe Board is thoroughly in accord with your method of dealwith situations of this kind as indicated by your letter of
nvember 21 to the President of the institution. In this connecon, however, it is noted that reference is made in your letter
fik)veraber 21 to 'subsection (v) of section 12B of the Banking
s,
,
; of 1933', whereas it appears that you intended to refer to
,use
of section 12B of the Federal Reserve Act.
19_"IhEtnis
(v)
inclosed copy of a regulation dated November 22,
'
53, issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation with
respect to
'bank advertising' which you may find helpful in dealwith this subject."

l
L

Approved.
Letter dated November 27, 1933, to honorable W. A. Julian,
Treasurer of
the United States, approved by six members of the Board,
re4dinc as
follows:
4:41 response to your recent request, the Federal Reserve Board
,
v 6 taken up with the Federal Reserve banks the question as to
xther they
- would be willing to undertake the holdingin custody
binde which are pledged as security for postal savings deposits
3;1/41:
replies indicate that they are willing to undertake this
arlovice, althou]h there is a considerable diversity of opinion
pris.the several banks as to just what this service should cornthi 'use Board, however, understands from hr. Smead, who discussed
Pecl (1"Gtion with you recently, that you would like to have the
aseeral Reserve banks hold in custody, for their member banks only,
allerties of the United States Government and coupon bonds isser,
states, and that you have no objection to the Federal Reexp ve oanks
reserving the right to obtain reimbursement of their
11t,r;
IT
:
I min this connection from such member banks as elect to
Perform this service. If you will be good enough to
tZlse the
Board in this respect and furnish it with a tentative
of c
ustodianship agreement, the Board will be glad to submit




,250
11/28/33

-57,
suea agreement to the Federal Reserve banks for any conuaents and
8uggesti0n5
they may wish to make."
Approved.
Letter dated November 14, 1933, to La. Harrison, Governor of

the

Federal Reserve Bank of New York, prepared by Governor Black and
11.11
'1"".er in accordance with the action taken at the meeting of the

21°11rd on November
7, 1933, approved by six members of the Board, and
rellding as
follows:
"The Board has considered your letter of October 19th in which
aceptingYOUsk
for
an expression of the views of the Board with respect
1.to your
accepting the post which the statutes of the Bank for InRernational Settlements reserve for the Governor of the Federal
Bank of New York on the Board of Directors of the Bank
for
Ior I
nternational Settlements.
"The Board has carefully considered this matter
in view of its
Coneral
conduct
supervisor
respect
the
to
and operaduties
with
y
tion of
Federal Reserve Banks, and especially in vievrof the replaced upon the Board under sub-section (g) of sectrans4 of the
Federal Reserve Act relating to relationships and
actions with foreign banks and bankers.
c__,The Board has reached the conclusion that you should not ac1,7%-pe appointment which
has been offered you by Mr. Fraser,
_,e;3--ent of the Bank for International Settlements, and begs to
vi
that at the present time it would not be willing to grant
1.)ermi ssion
for such step made necessary by the sub-section of
section 14
cited."
Approved.
Carter

Reply to a letter dated November 23, 1933, from Honorable
Glass, 'United States Senator; the reply reading as follows:

havo your letter of Hovember 23rd acknowledging mine of
th"°4Dor 21st concerning your inquiry, through Mr. Hamlin, as to
oi,ej_?1Tlission from the recent issue of the Federal Reserve Bulletin
review of business conditions of the country.
LY letter to
you of November 21st was intended to be a full
lir specific
reply to your inquiry as transmitted to the Board by
The Board is very glad to answer your further inas contained in your present letter.




#.„.4
"51
11/28/33
"In order that you may see how the Bulletin is made up, there
ls inclosed herewith copy of the November issue. The first part
Of the Bulletin contains two principal sections. One of these,
°II Page 679 in the November Bulletin, is entitled 'National SumarY of Business conditions'. The other, page 669, is entitled
Reiew of the Month'
"The National Summary of Business Conditions is a regular
feature of the Bulletin, appearing every month, and is in a
standardized form. It is prepared in cooperation with a cormittee
of Federal
reserve agents and is intended to show, so far as this
ls possible by statistical indices and comparable indicators,
changes
that have taken place in the month covered in the Sumnary
ln.industrial production, emnloyment, construction, distribution,
Prices, foreign exchange, bank credit, and money rates; To repeat,
:
Ileh a National Summary appears in every Bulletin and in substanlaly similar form.
fi The Review of the Month is of a different character. It is
r -exlble, lending itself to the presentation or discussion of the
aos
significant events of the month in the perspective of a longer
erl°d and to an analysis and interpretation of important business,
nank1nG and financial developments. It occasionally contains imi7tEnt Public announcements which are incorporated as a matter of
nlstcrical record or for reference purposes. It has, therefore,
standard form. Vihile it has often contained a survey of business
c
developments from a broader point of view or for a longer
,
'
0
4 .„1 -Led of time
than is deemed appropriate in the National Summary
'
Plsineso Conditions, such surveys are not an invariable or
et,,
- ?rilarY feature of the Review of the Lonth.
the Hovember Bulletin treated as an outstanding development in
° financial field the Administration's position on banking and
linetarY matters as outlined in the address of the Iresident deOr2 on October 22nd, and the proceedings of the Deposit Liquidapr-"Board as announced in its telegram of October 18th, end other
.,!edings of the Deposit Liquidation Board; announcements relative
to°c
Ree°1e
rchase of preferred stock from non-member banks by the
re ,
1sIruction Finance Corporation; certain executive orders and
tion relative to newly mined gold and the action of the
to 7:1Ilictration relative to such Fold; and proceedings with respect
he
purchase of gold in foreign markets.
It was felt that this information was of paramount importance
.6;1 should be
presented in full and in its official form. For
season
the
,
1
review for November consists of quotation of oficj
statements.
off.11:le course taken by the review in I:ovember in presenting only
lal statements was exactly the same as was taken in March of
th
hol:' Year, when the review consisted of a summary of State bank
tt,,ldaYs, the Proclamation of the President of March 6, his mesall e to
Coni;ress of March 9, the emergency bank act of flarch 9,
ci other
Pertinent public documents relating to the banking

T

Z

t

4




252
11/128/33

-59-

emergency. The review for arch contained no editorial discusr. Of business and banking conditions, but that issue of the
"lletin, as every other issue, carried the national summary of
business conditions, which appeared on page 134.
In view of the impression to which you refer that a change
.
ln the form of the review for November was related to a protest
ade by General Johnson about a sentence in the October review,
%sh to state clearly what occurred in that connection.
, On October 26th General Johnson called Dr. Goldenveiser over
uhe.telephone and took exception to the following sentence in the
.°172.evi* of the month in the October Bulletin: 'It (the decline in
Inaustrial activity) has also been marked in industries in -which
?r°oessing taxes and codes have become effective recently', stat14f;; to Dr. Goldenweiser that this was not correct. Dr. Gol6enwel5er called General Johnson's attention to the context of that
Part of the
review of the month and stated that the sentence ob!oted to should be read in connection with the full context, and
the statement
atement to which objection had been taken was true.
Goldenmeiser nor any member of the Board or its staff
sp
ozz other cement or suggestion of any kind from
G:sneliZeJohlrn
theAt the time
of this telephone conversation, on October 26th,
L ovember bulletin was in the hands of the printer and the
eej
'ePhone conversation with General Johnson had no effect on its
ents. Nothing -was taken from it after such telephone conver07,10n and there were added to it only official statements and
)r ofLicial matter which had not been published at the t io the
"'e tin vent to the prinLer. It follows that the omission of the
11r
.1 w from the November Bulletin was in no way related to General
H2°n's protest over the telephone on October 26th.
yon Ihe i)oard
trusts that the above statement will make clear be"314 radventure that the way in which the Kovember issue of the
low..!tPein was prepared was identical with that which has boon folth,;Z' ln past years. There is nothing whatever in connection with
bulletin which marks a departure from the well-established
)1edure of the Board and the Board
desires me to add that no dee is in contemplation."

T

X

BZ

4

1

Approved.
the
0t

Letters dated November 24,
1933, approved by five members of
130ard, to
applicants for permits under the Clayton Act, advising

eq)Proval of
their applications as follows:
a, d,enry
Hornbrook, for pernission to serve at the same time
,trector of lhe Indiana Lational Bank of Indianapolis, Indian1.'41,t1s, Indiana,
and as director of The Union Trust Company of
'1sinaPolis, Indianapolis, Indiana.




“53

)

11A3A6

i

-60La.. Fred G.
Appel, for permission to serve at the same time as
director of The Indiana rational Bank of Indianapolis, Indianap?1i8, Indiana, and as director of The Union Trust Company or
India:_apolis,
Indianapolis., Indiana.
Edgar h.. Evans, for permission to serve at the same time as
uir
.ector of
The Indiana National Bank of Indianapolis, Indianap.
c) 1e, Indiana, and as director of The Union Irust Company of Inclianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana.
John Lallantyne, for permission to servo at the same time as
;0-rector and
officer of the Lanufacturers i- .ational Bank of Detroit,
,etroit,
and as director of the Detroit branch, Federal
Michigan'
41eserve Bank
of Chicago, Detroit, Lachigan.
G.
."rGe J. Schaller, for permission to serve at the same time
,” director
and officer of the Citizens First National Lank,
Lake, Iowa, and as director of the Federal Reserve Bank of
`413-cago, Chicago, Illinois.
Approved.
There were then presented the following applications for origi/lal

stock, or for the
surrender of steck,of Federal reserve banks:
ShLres

or ORIGliaL Stock:
uo. 2.
DTT.7
t
ehl r7a7r Bank, Belmar, New Jersey
National Bank, Branchville, New
Jersey

72
/15

Dictrict 1.o.
Strap_t_ustetval ational Bank in Strausstom,
stown, Pennsylvania
_
'
1;4.4e-l1/4'raus8
11.118
13a
zirik
ivai()ifi
alkes-Barre, Viilkes-Barre,

•

36
3,900

4.
LEIA7,377Z
-Bank in Bryan, Bryan, Ohio
cirjt
Lational Bank of
Caldwell, Ohio
Ohio
Albion,
Penn
!Ylania
Iirl;tt;ellttitotnian.113catilltjAYltreld'

117

3,936

36
54
36
33

hational Bank, Blairsville,
ertlfniasylvania
atonal Bank,
14ercer,Pennsylvaniaja
Grafton,
liational
Bank
LowPennsYlvan
vc)
of
?aitors
1:a-Lional Bank,
Wilmington,
slansylvania




72
66
36
36

369

11/28/33

-61-

ii. strict1j-cations
for ORIGINAL Stock; (Continued)
Di
,.......
No-• 5•
Cecirra71771717Bank at Port Deposit, Port
Deposit, Maryland

Shares

45

45

Listrict No.
7•
CitY
National Bank in Dixon, Dixon, Illinois

75

75

trc1 O
"
First NatICTIZT-Bank of Lount Vernon, Illinois

75

75

1;0. 11.
41/.41 Arintinal Bank, Santa Anna, Texas

36
Total

36
4,653

Ap
'-ications for SURRENDER of Stock:
ZEITict No. 1
Portland, Maine
FirarBank,
?'00Ples-Ticonic National Bank, Viaterville,
4ine
ebster
(Insolvent)
National Bank, .;ebster, Massachusetts
(Insolvent)
pnistrict No.
2.
iational Bank, Orange,
levr Jersey
liquidated
through
conservator)
crst
Lational Bank, Gouverneur, New York
(EeinE liquidated
through conservator)
Dist •
Po 3.
41111t
earl hational Bank, nount Ephraim,
,versey (Insolvent)
It
141tional Bank, Goldsboro, Pennsylvania
\Insolvent)
ripl*."'triet
(Let N
ational B
, Barbourville, Kentucky
liquidated
throuL;h conservator)
Eank of John A. Black,
Barbourville,
Pir4i. li0kY (Being liouidated throu-h conservator)
(;
1 -Rtional
Bank, Portsnouth, Ohio
Pir,t°1-11C l
iouidated through conservator)
(1 '44tional
Bank in Derry, Pennsylvania
Firl,
us olvent)
(Bei
a Bank
4Rtion1
FinleiTva*11e, Pe
Pennsylvania
liew 1,1 11 l
iquidated
conservator)
throw,h
pen°rence
Lational Bank, Lew Florence,
c0;;;%1
.:t
11.
.a
) (fleinr, liouidated through




540
300
132

972

360
180

540

30
42

66
63
540
60

41
30

72

11/2e/33

-62-

4Plications for SURRENDER of Stock: (Continued)
District No. 4. —
1Continued)
Pleasant Unity
National Bank, Pleasant Unity,
Pennsylvania (Insolvent)
5*
Cltizens raTronal
Bank, Gastonia, North Carolina
(Voluntary liquidation; succeeded by The
Citizens rational Bank in Gastonia)
'llsst rational
Bank, Keyser, :1 .est Virginia
(Being liquidated through conservator
)listrict No. 6,
'Ll7c1,rd
National Bank, Hartford, Alabama
pe\2eing liquidated through conservator)
Soto
National Bank, Arcadia, Florida
Fir(!ecrease in surplus)
't national
Bank of Commerce, Tarpon Springs,
Piorida
(Insolv ent)
District No.
7.
First
National Bank & Trust Company of
p
Bloomington, Illinois (Insolvent)
irt*-11enry
National Bank, Henry, Illinois
an
colvent)
liew1/144
National Bank, Newman, Illinois
,.
(Insolvent)
'Irt
National
lInsolvelt) Bank, Ransom, Illinois
Ir”
National Bank, Savanna, Illinois
pi
acing
liquidated through conservator)
”t
co l national Bank, Steward, Illinois
Insolvent)
11,creial
National Bank, Wilmington, Illinois
p

Shares

84

360
72

Viabash National Bank, Wabash,
p. 14cliana
(heinP liquidated through conservator)
- vator)
Nat
conial
Bank,
Exira' I"a
eitlze
ilireclvent)
ns N
ational Bank, hampton, Iowa
(13cing
'irst
liquidated through conservator)
(BeNational Bank, Hawarden, Iowa
pi
l
'4rz3t
iquidated through conservator)
National Bank, Little Rock, Iowa
(I liational Bank, Almont, Michigan
lis°1vent)
(,
Lational Bank, Avoca,
Michigan
\-Llas
olvent)




432

36
11
69

240
60
75
30
90
36

an8Olvent)

41'r.rS

884

60
177
26
120
60
30
19
24

116

'

N'

11/28/33

-63-

cations for SURRENDill of Stock
'
'fjgZIEL..a1_7.
Continued)

(Continued)

Lachigan
(I
nsolvent)
r8t National
Bank, Richn"d' Lachigan
(I
nsolvent)
F.3.1.8t N
ational Bank, Shawano, Wisconsin
(Insolvent)
Pirt
Dardanelle, Arkansas
lI
nsolvent)
National Bank, Columbia, Illinois
Ofoluntary
liquidation; succeeded by
p Pirst
Nationa.1
Bank in Columbia)
ar i
erns
a oliIa
ve
ti
nt
orl Bank, Dahlsren, Illinois

T

Dist •

Shares

18
54
72

18

51
17

86

0

lIat10771—Bank, Lake Linden, Michigan
(Decrease In capital and surplus)
lrst Rational
Bank, Joodhue, Amnesota
F.
(Insolvent)
lit national
Bank, Valier, Montana
In
solvent)
triet Ro. 10.
1;ationa.1 Bank, Boulder, Colorado
4,0(13;3111g liquidated throush conservator)
-7`Aer -National
Bank, Boulder, Colorado
through conservator)
R
Central City, Colorado
(Insolvent)
ubst:7
national Bank, Golden,
olorado
p.

84
21
15

120

102
60
21
60

Bank, La 'zeta, Colorado
uvir.?11

Col.ulty National Bank, Burr Oak,
Kansas
(Voluntary licuidation, absorbed by
Fir 1:hu
'
r Oak State Bank,
nonmember)
'
t ilati°nal Bank,
an
Haviland, Kansas
‘/ITI°11antary liquidation; succeeded
by
ceirCalriland state Bank,
nonmember)
(1.:'1.1 City
National Bank, Central City, Nebraska
\.1.4solvent)

18

42

36
60

pitzt,,,rict No,
11.
i.4,1111.tionirrank, Sylvester, Texas
°11rent)

r




21

399

257
11/28/33

-64-

A l
ications for SURRENDER of Stock: (Continued)
DistrictLo. 11. (Continued)
117117171:7
1Bank of West, West, Texas
(Insolvent)

Shares

57

36

!,:jFI._rict No. 12.
Albany, Oregon
(Insolvent)
a M.
Peterson Bank, Riohfield, Utah
(I
nsolvent)




45
60
Total

105 4,974

Approved.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Secre ary.