View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for November 27, 1964

To:

Members of the Board

From: Office of the Secretary
Attached is a copy of the minutes of the Board of Governors
Of the Federal Reserve System on the above date.
It is proposed to place in the record of policy actions
required to be kept under the provisions of section 10 of the
Federal Reserve Act an entry covering the item in this set of
minutes commencing on the page and dealing with the subject
referred to below:
Page 13

Approval of a discount rate of 4 per cent
for the Federal Reserve Banks of Minneapolis
and Kansas City.

Should you have any question with regard to the minutes,
it will be appreciated if you will advise the Secretary's Office.
Otherwise, please initial below. If you were present at the
meeting, your initials will indicate approval of the minutes. If
ndicate only that you
You were not present, your initials vii
have seen the minutes.
Chairman Martin
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. Mitchell
Gov. Daane

Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System on Friday, November 27, 1964.

The Board met in the Board

Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Mills
Robertson
Shepardson
Mr. Sherman, Secretary
Mr. Broida, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Young, Adviser to the Board and Director,
Division of International Finance
Mr. Molony, Assistant to the Board
Mr. Cardon, Legislative Counsel
Mr. Fauver, Assistant to the Board
Mr. Brill, Director, Division of Research
and Statistics
Mr. Solomon, Director, Division of Examinations
Mr. Holland, Associate Director, Division
of Research and Statistics
Associate Director, Division of
Koch,
Mr.
Research and Statistics
Mr. Partee, Adviser, Division of Research
and Statistics
Mr. Katz, Associate Adviser, Division of
International Finance
Mr. Reynolds, Associate Adviser, Division of
International Finance
Mr. Spencer, General Assistant, Office of
the Secretary
Mr. Axilrod, Chief, Government Finance Section,
Division of Research and Statistics
Chief, Banking Section, Division
Eckert,
Mr.
and Statistics
Research
of
Capital Markets Section,
Chief,
Mr. Keir,
and Statistics
Research
of
Division
Economist,
Division of International
Mr. Baker,
Finance
Mr. Gemmill, Economist, Division of
International Finance
Mr. Furth, Consultant

11/27/64

-2-

Money market review.

Mr. Axilrod reviewed developments

in the Government securities market, illustrating his remarks
by reference to distributed tables that indicated yields on U.S.
Government securities and dealer positions in Treasury coupon
issues.

Mr. Holland then presented certain observations on

the Government securities market, following which Mr. Baker
reported on conditions in foreign exchange markets.
Following discussion based on the review, all members
Of the staff except Messrs. Sherman, Young, Molony, Fauver,
Brill, Solomon, and Spencer withdrew from the meeting and the
following entered the room:
Hackley, General Counsel
Farrell, Director, Division of Bank Operations
Johnson, Director, Division of Personnel Administration
Smith, Assistant Director, Division of Examinations
Egertson, Supervisory Review Examiner, Division of
Examinations
Mr. Hart, Assistant to the Director, Division of Personnel
Administration

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Circulated items.

The following items, copies of which

are attached to these minutes under the respective item numbers
indicated, were approved unanimously:
Item No.
Letter to Chemical Bank New York Trust Company,
Nell' York, New York, approving the establishment
cf a branch at 111-01 Queens Boulevard,
)
Forest Hills.

1

4
11/27/64

-3Item No.

Letter to Girard Trust Bank, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, approving the establishment
Of a branch at 3459 Walnut Street.

2

Letter to Bank of Yazoo City, Yazoo City,
Mississippi, approving the establishment of
a branch in the vicinity of Grand Avenue and
Ninth Street.

3

Letter to The Dollar Savings Bank, Niles, Ohio,
approving the establishment of a branch at
425 Robbins Avenue.

14.

Letter to The Peoples State Bank of Holland,
Holland, Michigan, approving the establishment
Of a branch at 40-42 East 9th Street.

5

Letter to Citizens Trust and Savings Bank,
South Haven, Michigan, approving the establishment of a branch in the York Hotel Building,
262 Center Street, provided that operations
are discontinued upon completion of the
remodeling program for the bank's main office.

6

Letter to Wells Fargo Bank, San Francisco,
California, approving the establishment of a
branch at 851 Burlway Road, Burlingame.

7

Letter to United California Bank, Los Angeles,
California, approving an extension of time to
establish a branch on State Street between
La Cumbre Road and San Roque Road near Santa
Barbara.

8

Letter to First Bank and Trust Company of South
Bend, South Bend, Indiana, approving an
investment in bank premises.

9

Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
aPProving a revision of the officers' salary
structure.

10

11/27/64
With respect to Item No. 10, Governor Shepardson noted
that the revision of the officers' salary structure at the New
York Reserve Bank had been discussed by President Hayes and First
Vice President Treiber with the Board's Committee on Organization,
Compensation, and Building Plans, and the revision was in accord
with that discussion.
Report on competitive factors (Muncie-Yorktown, Indiana).
A report to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on the
competitive factors involved in the proposed merger of Industrial

Trust & Savings Bank, Muncie, Indiana, and Yorktown State Bank,
Yorktown, Indiana, was approved unanimously for transmittal to the
Corporation.

The conclusion read as follows:

The proposed merger of Industrial Trust & Savings
Bank, Muncie, Indiana, and Yorktown State Bank,
Yorktown, Indiana, would not have adverse effects
on competition.
Report on competitive factors (Owenton-Monterey, Kentucky).
There had been distributed a draft of report to the Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation on the competitive factors involved in
the proposed acquisition of assets and assumption of liability
to pay deposits of The First State Bank, Monterey, Kentucky, by
Peoples Bank & Trust Company, Owenton, Kentucky.
Discussion of the draft report touched upon the possible
competitive implications of certain recent transactions involving

'

11/27/64

-5-

the acquisition of controlling interest of Farmers Bank and First
National Bank, both of which were located in Owenton.
The report was then approved unanimously for transmittal
to the Corporation, the conclusion reading as follows:
Acquisition of the stock of First State Bank,
Monterey, by individuals who are officers and
directors of Peoples Bank and Trust Company,
Owenton, has principally eliminated whatever
competition may have existed between the two
banks. Moreover, potential for competition is
limited by the size of First State Bank and its
location in Monterey, a small rural town with
little prospect for growth. The overall effect
of the proposed transaction on competition would
not be adverse.
Mr. Egertson then withdrew from the meeting.
Maximum interest rates on deposits (Item No. 11).

There

had been distributed a memorandum from Mr. Hackley dated November 25,
1964, attached to which was a draft statement of interpretations
Intended to answer certain questions in connection with changes
in the maximum permissible rates of interest that member banks
maY Pay on time and savings deposits under the revision of the
Supplement to the Board's Regulation Q, Payment of Interest on
DePosits, that became effective November 24, 1964.

It was

'
l ecommended that the proposed interpretations be issued in the form
a press release and subsequently published in the Federal
Register and the Federal Reserve Bulletin.

-6-

11 27/64

Mr. Hackley, in comments supplementing the information
presented in his memorandum, said that the proposed statement of
interpretations had been discussed with the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation; however, it was understood that the CarPoration would not in this instance issue a similar statement.
Following discussion during which a number of changes in
the draft were agreed upon, the Board approved the statement
Of interpretations and its issuance today in the form of a press
release.

It was understood that the statement would be published

la the Bulletin and the Federal Register.

A copy in the form

transmitted to the Federal Register is attached as Item No. 11.
Messrs. Young, Fauver, and Brill then withdrew from the
Ifleeting.
Appointment of Chief Examiner at San Francisco (Items 12 and 13).

There had been circulated a memorandum from the Division of Personnel
Administration dated November 12, 1964, recommending approval of
the payment of salary to Mr. H. B. Jamison as Chief Examiner of
the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco at the rate of $14,000
Per annum, effective December 1, 1964.
tixed by the Bank's Board of Directors.

The salary rate was that
Attached to the memorandum

/*/4s a draft of letter to the San Francisco Reserve Bank that would
reflect the Board's approval.

•
ik,;k 4t

11/27/64

-7-

Mr. Johnson said that the appointment of Mr. Jamison as
Chief Examiner was of more importance than was usually the case,
because in this instance it was likely that he would be appointed
Vice President in charge of bank examinations upon the retirement
Of Vice President Galvin; Mr. Galvin was scheduled for retirement
at the end of February 1965.
In supplemental comment, Mr. Solomon remarked that the
matter of Mr. Jamison's appointment had been discussed with President
Swan.

It was felt that Mr. Jamison was qualified to move into the

Chief Examiner position and, ultimately, into the position of Vice
President in charge of the examination function.
In the discussion that followed, it was understood that the
Board would not wish to commit itself at this juncture to the
aPpointment of Mr. Jamison as the officer in charge of the examination function at the Bank. This sentiment was recognized as
not being a personal reflection upon Mr. Jamison's qualifications
btlt of the Board's desire to maintain high standards in the quality
Of supervision in the Bank Examinations Departments at the
various Federal Reserve Banks and, in this connection, to strengthen

the examination function at the San Francisco Bank. It was felt
that the Bank should review every aspect of the matter before filling
the vacancy caused by Mr. Calvin's retirement.

11/27/64

-8-

There was general agreement with a suggestion made
by Chairman Martin that the draft of letter to the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco should be revised to reflect the Board's
views on this matter.
Mr. Jamison's appointment as Chief Examiner at the salary
rate fixed by the Bank's Board of Directors, effective December 1,

1964, was then approved unanimously. In connection with this action,
it was understood that the Bank would be advised that the Board
was prepared to approve the retention of the services of Vice
President Galvin for one year beyond normal retirement, until
March 1, 1966, if requested by the Bank.
A copy of the letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of San
Prancisco, in the form transmitted, is attached as Item No. 12.
Secretary's Note: In a letter dated
December 2, 1964, the Reserve Bank
requested the retention of the services
of Vice President Galvin. Accordingly,
a reply (copy attached as Item No. 13)
was sent on December 9, 1964, informing
the Bank of the Board's approval.
Mr. Hart then withdrew from the meeting.
Form of examination report.

At the conclusion of a discussion

at the Board meeting on July 29, 1964, there was a consensus favoring
the use of a proposed new form of report of examination of the
?ederal Reserve Banks on a trial basis.

The principal effect of

the proposed report was to replace the rather full scale reports

11/27/64

-9-

formerly prepared for each Reserve Bank branch with a brief
letter report and to also curtail the contents of the material in
the main section of the report.

In addition, the summarizing

memorandum to the Board was to be replaced by a simple note, to
be circulated with the report, indicating certain pages that might
deserve special attention.
There had been circulated to the Board the reports of
examination of the Federal Reserve Banks of Cleveland and Minneapolis as of July 20, 1964, and August 17, 1964, respectively.
Both reports had been prepared in a manner that was to reflect
the understanding at the meeting on July 29 of how such reports
were to be presented.

The two reports of examination were listed

on the agenda for discussion at today's meeting.
Governor Mills, commenting upon the examination reports,
indicated that he felt they tended to be too abbreviated in content,
failing to provide sufficient information to acquaint the members
of the Board fully with the internal position of the Banks examined.
In his opinion, the exclusions from the reports were greater than
Ilas desirable.

Also, the reports had not indicated areas where the

sampling technique was employed in substitution of verification
Procedures heretofore used.

Furthermore, the reports seemed to

imPlY acceptance of the various expenditures on the part of the
Reserve Banks by indicating that there were no expenditures not

11/27/64

-10-

covered by the Board's approval.

While he recognized that differences

Of opinion could be genuine whether an expenditure fell within the
scope of having Board approval, he believed there were probably
expenditures that warranted comment.

It was his feeling that such

expenditures should be submitted to the Board for review.
In a general discussion that followed Governor Mills'
remarks, Mr. Solomon noted that in the case of certain Reserve Bank
activities use of the sampling technique had replaced verification
during an examination.

The use of such sampling techniques had

been in line with recommendations made by Haskins & Sells, which
recommendations had been approved by the Board.

However, sampling

Ilas not used with respect to determining the propriety of a Reserve
Bank's expenditures.

Each expense was reviewed for propriety.

If

there was any question, the expenditure was brought before the Board
or entered in the report of examination.
Mr. Solomon then went on to describe a recent meeting that
he had attended with representatives of Haskins & Sells.

While

that firm had not submitted its report, Mr. Solomon believed that
it would favor the current form of examination report.
There followed further discussion with respect to the form
c)f examination reports as represented by the Cleveland and Minneapolis reports.

At the conclusion of this discussion, there was

.mext with a suggestion by Chairman Martin that the matter of

11/27/64

-11-

the form of examination reports should be considered further at a
time when all members of the Board were present.
Examinations of Cleveland and Minneapolis Reserve Banks.
Following the foregoing discussion, Mr. Smith summarized the information
presented in the reports of examination of the Federal Reserve Banks
Of Cleveland and Minneapolis made by the Board's examining staff
as of July 20, 1964, and August 17, 1964, respectively, both of
which had been circulated to the Board.
It appeared that the examinations had not disclosed any
matters that were regarded as calling for action by the Board.
Mr. Johnson then withdrew from the meeting.
Ratification of telegram to Kansas City regarding certain
litigation (Item No. 14).

Mr. Sherman presented for ratification

a telegram that had been sent, following a discussion with
Governor Shepardson, on the afternoon of November 25, 1964, to
Mr- Floyd J. Mathews, Assistant Cashier and Assistant Federal
Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

The

telegram authorized Mr. Mathews to ccmply with a subpoena served
On him calling for the production of all books and documents
reflecting receipt and issue of certain Federal Reserve notes in
c onnection with litigation involving the United States of America
v- William Merle Canaday in the United States District Court for

the Western District of Missouri. Also included in the telegram

11/27/64
Was

-12-

authorization for Mr. Mathews to testify regarding the books

and documents produced if he was required to do so.
The sending of the telegram, a copy of which is attached
as Item No. 14, was ratified by unanimous vote.
Bank of Powhatan (Item No. 15).

Mr. O'Connell referred to

the Board's action on November 12, 1964, pursuant to which a
telegram had been sent to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
authorizing access by an Assistant United States Attorney to the
Open section of certain reports of examination and other data
relating to Bank of Powhatan, Powhatan, Virginia.

The request by

the United States Attorney for access to the examination reports
was in connection with criminal action

pending in the U.S. District

Court for the Eastern District of Virginia entitled United States
v. James Lovelace Tribble.

The defendant, a former executive

vice president of the bank, was charged with wrongful and unauthorized
use of the bank's funds and with making an unauthorized extension
Of credit.
Mr. O'Connell stated that in a letter dated November 24,
1964/ Vice President and General Counsel Welford S. Farmer of
the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond advised that subpoenas had
been served at the request of the United States Attorney calling
tor testimony on December 1, 1964, by Vice President John L. Nosker,

-13-

11/27/64

Examining Officer Chester D. Porter, Jr., and Examiner John M.
Beducian in connection with the aforementioned litigation.

It

Was understood that the testimony that it was anticipated would
be required would probably relate to the contents of certain
records of Bank of Powhatan, including reports of examination of
the bank prepared by the Reserve Bank examiners, dated November 18,
1961, may

7, 1962, June 3, 1963, and August 7, 1963. The pro-

duction of such reports and related materials by officials of Bank
Of Powhatan was understood to have been ordered by the District
Court Judge.
A draft of letter had been prepared that would reflect
Board authorization for Messrs. Nosker, Porter, and Beducian to
aPpear in the District Court in response to the subpoenas issued
and to give such testimony as might be required.

However, this

authorization would not include production by the witnesses of any
documents from the Reserve Bank's files.
The letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was
4.P.P.E2y2s1 unanimously in the form attached as Item No. 15.
L.
The meeting then adjourned.
Secretary's Notes: Telegrams were received
today from the Federal Reserve Banks of
Minneapolis and Kansas City stating that
the directors of those Banks had established, subject to review and determination
by the Board of Governors, a rate of 4 per
cent (rather than 3-1/2 per cent) on

11/27/64

-14discounts for and advances to member banks
under sections 13 and 13a of the Federal Reserve
Act; a rate of 4-1/2 per cent (rather than
4 per cent) on advances under section 10(b);
and a rate of 5 per cent (rather than 4 per cent
at the Minneapolis Bank and 4-1/2 per cent at
the Kansas City Bank) on advances to individuals, partnerships, and corporations other
than member banks under the last paragraph
of section 13. Pursuant to the authorization
given at the meeting on November 23, 1964,
the Secretary informed the Banks by telegram
of the Board's approval of the rates established by their directors, effective November 30,
1964. A press statement was issued at 4:00 p.m.
EST, all Reserve Banks and branches were notified by telegram, and arrangements were made
for publication of a notice in the Federal
Register.
Governor Shepardson today approved on behalf
of the Board a telegram to the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York (attached Item No. 16) approving the designation of Robert Meyer as
special assistant examiner.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 1

OF THE

11/27/64

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE SOAR()

November 27, 1964.

Board of Directors,
Chemical Bank New York Trust Company,
New York, New York.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System approves the establishment by
Chemical Bank New York Trust Company, New York,
New York, of a branch at 111-01 Queens Boulevard,
Forest Hills, Borough of Queens, New York, provided the branch is established within one year
from the date of this letter.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke
Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.
(The letter to the Reserve Bank stated that the
Board also had approved a six-month extension
of the period allowed to establish the branch;
and that if an extension should be requested,
the procedure prescribed in the Board's letter
of November 9, 1962 (S-1846), should be followed.)

ht)
Item No. 2
11/27/64

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, O. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November

Board of Directors,
Girard Trust Bank,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System approves the establishment by
Girard Trust Bank, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
of a branch at 3459 Walnut Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, provided the branch is established
within six months from the date of this letter.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke

Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.
(The letter to the Reserve Bank stated that the
Board also had approved a six-month extension
branch;
of the period allowed to establish the
requested,
be
and that if an extension Should
the procedure prescribed in the Board's letter
of November 9, 1962 (S-1846), should be followed.)

27, 1964.

flUGS
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No.

OF THE

11/27/64

3

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November 27, 1964.

Board of Directors,
Bank of Yazoo City,
Yazoo City, Mississippi.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System approves the establishment by Bank
of Yazoo City, Yazoo City, Mississippi, of a branch
in the vicinity of the intersection of Grand Avenue
and Ninth Street, Yazoo City, Mississippi, provided
the branch is established within one year from the
date of this letter.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke
Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.
(The letter to the Reserve Bank stated that the
Board also had approved a six-month extension
of the period allowed to establish the branch;
and that if an extension should be requested,
the procedure prescribed in the Board's letter
of November 9, 1962 (s-1846), should be followed.)

Item No. 4

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

11/27/64

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November 27, 1964.

Board of Directors,
The Dollar Savings Bank,
Niles, Ohio.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System approves the establishment by
The Dollar Savings Bank, Niles, Ohio of a branch
at 425 Robbins Avenue, Niles, Ohio, provided
the branch is established within one year from
the date of this letter.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke
Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.

(The letter to the Reserve Bank stated that the
Board also had approved a six-month extension
of the period Olowed to establish the branch;
and that if an extension should be requested,
the procedure prescribed in the Board's letter
of November 9, 1962 (S-1846), Should be followed.)

)
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No.

OF THE

11/27/64

5

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551

4• •
'

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

RESt
• •. .•

November 27, 1964

Board of Directors,
The Peoples State Bank of Holland,
Holland, Michigan.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System approves the establishment by The Peoples State Bank of Holland,
Holland, Michigan, of a branch at 40-42 East
9th Street, Holland, Michigan, provided the
branch is established within one year from
the date of this letter.
Very truly yours,

(Signed) Karl E. Bakke
Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.
(The letter to the Reserve Bank stated that the
Board also had approved a six-month extension
of the period allowed to establish the branch;
and that if an extension should be requested,
the procedure prescribed in the Board's letter
of November 9, 1962 (s-1846), should be followed.)

40.11
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No.

OF THE

11/27/64

6

...•...

p0V Col;•

td? ..

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

4•
1
/
'
4'
RESOL •
•. ,•

November 27, 1964.

Board of Directors,
Citizens Trust and Savings Bank,
South Haven, Michigan.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
approves the establishment by Citizens Trust and Savings Bank,
South Haven, Michigan, of a branch in the York Hotel Building,
262 Center Street, South Haven, Michigan, provided the branch
is established within six months from the date of this letter
and provided further that branch operations at 262 Center
Street are discontinued upon completion of the remodeling
program for Citizens Trust and Savings Bank's main office.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke
Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.
the
(The letter to the Reserve Bank stated that
Board also had approved a six-month extension
of the period allowed to establish the branch;
and that if an extension should be requested,
the procedure prescribed in the Board's letter
of November 9, 1962 (S-1846), should be followed.)

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No.

OF THE

7

11/27/64

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November 27, 1964.

Board of Directors,
Wells Fargo Bank,
San Francisco, California.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System approves the establishment by
Wells Fargo Bank, San Francisco, California, of
a branch at 851 Burlway Road, Burlingame, San
Mateo County, California, provided the branch is
established within one year from the date of this
letter.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke
Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.
(The letter to the Reserve Bank stated that the
Board also had approved a six-month extension
of the period allowed to establish the branch;
and that if an extension should be requested,
the procedure prescribed in the Board's letter
of November 9, 1962 (S-1846), should be followed.)

I 11473
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No.

OF THE

11/27/64

8

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November 27, 1964.

Board of Directors,
United California Bank,
Los Angeles, California.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System extends to June 22, 1965, the time within which
United California Bank may establish a branch on State
Street between La Cumbre Road and San Roque Road in an
unincorporated area adjacent to and west of the city of
Santa Barbara, California.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke
Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No.

OF THE

11/27/64

9

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November 27, 1964.

Board of Directors,
First Bank and Trust Company of
South Bend,
South Bend, Indiana.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System approves, under the provisions of
Section 214 of the Federal Reserve Act, a direct
and indirect investment of not to exceed $636,000
in bank premises by First Bank and Trust Company
of South Bend, South Bend, Indiana, for the
remodeling of the bank's main office.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke

Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secreta Y•

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 10
11/27/64

OF THE

0l GQ.

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE HOARD

November 27, 1964.

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
Mr. Alfred Hayes, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
New York, New York 10045.
Dear Mr. Hayes:
The Board of Governors has approved, effective
immediately, the following minimum and maximum ranges for
the respective officer salary groups at the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, as requested in your letter of November 5,
1964.
Group

Minimum

Maximum

A
B
C
D
E

$26,000
22,500
19,000
16,500
14,500

$37,500
32,000
28,500
24,750
21,000

It is noted that Salary Group F has been eliminated.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

TITLE 12 - BANKS AND BANKING

Item No. 11
11/27/64

CHAPTER II - FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
SUBCHAX1ER A - BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
[Reg. Q1
PART 217 - PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON DEPOSITS
Maximum Interest Rates
i 217.139

Explanatory statement regarding maximum interest rates
on deyosits.
(a) The following comments are intended to answer certain

questions in connection with changes in the maximum permissible rates
of interest that member banks may pay on time and savings deposits
under the revision of § 217.6 of this Part (Supplement to Regulation Q)
that became effective November 24, 1964.
(b) Time certificates of deposit issued prior to
November 24, 1964, may be amended by a member bank, if desired, to
bear interest up to the new applicable increased maximum rates for
any period subsequent to that date.

For example, a certificate dated

JulY 1, 1964, maturing July 1, 1965, may be amended to bear interest
4 to a rate of 4-1/2 per cent for any period subsequent to November 24,
1964, (As hereafter noted, the rate would be subject to any reimposed by applicable State law.)
(c) While the revised § 217.6, like the section previously
in

effect, fixes a maximum rate of interest that may be paid on any

time deposit having a maturity of less than 90 days, the section
must) of course, be read in connection with the other provisions of

-2-

this Part. A deposit with a maturity of less than 30 days would not
constitute a "time deposit" within the meaning of the provisions of
§ 217.1 and, unless it met the definition of a savings deposit, the
deposit would constitute a demand deposit upon which the payment of
interest would not be permissible.
(d) The new maximum rates are not retroactive.

Consequently,

a savings deposit that has remained on deposit for less than 12 months
Prior to November 24, 1964, may bear interest at a rate up to not more
than 4 per cent for any period beginning with such date but may not
bear interest at a rate in excess of 3-1/2 per cent for any period
Prior to such date, except that, if and when a savings deposit, which
was in the bank prior to November 24, 1964, has remained in the bank
for a full 12-month period, interest may then be adjusted to provide
a yield of not more than 4 per cent from the date of the deposit.
(e) It should be borne in mind that State member banks are
subject also to any provisions of State law or regulations thereunder
that prescribe maximum rates of interest that they may pay on time
and savings deposits, and in some cases State-prescribed rates may
be less than the maximum rates prescribed by the Board.

In addition,

under section 24 of .the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 371), national

banks may not pay interest on time or savings deposits at a rate in
excess of the highest rate authorized by State law to be paid upon
such deposits by State banks or trust companies.

-3-

(f) It should be emphasized that § 217.6 of this Part
Prescribes only maximum rates of interest that member banks may pay
on time and savings deposits.

Member banks are free, of course, to

Pay lower interest rates if they so desire.
(12 U.S.C. 248(i).

Interprets or applies 12 U.S.C. 371b.)

Dated at Washington, D. C., this 27th day of November, 1964.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 12
11/27/64

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, O. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November 27, 1964.

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
Mr. Eliot J. Swan, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,
San Francisco, California.
94120
Dear Mr. Swan:
The Board of Governors approves the payment to
Mr. H. B. Jamison, Chief Examiner, Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco, of salary at the rate of $14,000 per annum,
effective December 1, 1964. The salary rate approved is
that fixed by your Board of Directors, as reported in your
letter of November 6, 1964.
As you know the Board has a special interest in
maintaining high standards in the quality of supervision in
the Bank Examination Departments at the various Federal
Reserve
Banks. While approving the appointment of Mr. Jamison as Chief
Examiner, the Board
does not commit itself to approving his
Promotion to the officer in charge of Bank Examinations upon
the retiremen
t of Mr. Galvin. This is not intended as a per!onal reflection on Mr.
Jamison but merely an indication of the
board's hope that the Bank will review all possibilities very
closely before action is taken
for replacement of Mr. Galvin.
Also, in view of the circumstances outlined in your
lett
,er of November 6, the Board
is prepared to approve the
5e tention of
the services of Vice President Galvin for one year
”Yond normal retirement, until March
1, 1966, if so requested
by your
Bank.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

/O()
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 13
11/27/64

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, O. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

December 9, 1964.

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
Mr. Eliot J. Swan, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,
San Francisco, California 94120.
Dear Mr. Swan:
The Board of Governors approves the retention of the
services of Vice President Galvin for one year beyond normal
retirement until March 1, 1966, as requested in your letter of
December 2, 1964.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

TELEGRAM
LEASED WIRE SERVICE

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON

Item No. 14
11/27/64

November 25, 1964.

Mathews - Kansas City
Re U.S. v. Canaday and your wire of this date, Board authorizes
your compliance with subpoena served on you calling for production
of all books and documents reflecting receipt and issue of
Federal Reserve notes listed as attachment to your Bank's letter
of August 29, 1961, to Attorney Shine.

Authorization herein

includes your testimony if required pertaining to books and
documents produced.

Urge that you state for record that your

been
appearance and testimony are pursuant to subpoena and have
authorized by Board.
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Sherman

1,
411)8 .
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 15
11/27/64

••••

OF THE

k)V LOt„. •
,

k

'/e4,•
0%.

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November 27, 1964.

Mr. W. S. Farmer, Vice President
and General Counsel,
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond,
Richmond, Virginia. 23213
Re:

United States v. James L. Tribble,
Docket No, 7456; U.S.D.C, E.D. Va.

Dear Mr. Farmer:
This refers to your letter dated November 24, 1964,
enclosing copies of subpoenas which have been :-)erved in the
above case, at the request oi the United States Attorney, calling
for testimony on December 1, 1964, in the Uniteu States District
Court by the following members of your Bank's staff: John L.
Nosker, Vice President; Chester D. Porter, Jr., Examining Officer;
and John M. Beducian, Examiner. Through conversations which you
have had with Mr. O'Connell of the Board's staff, it is understood
that the testimony which it is anticipated will be required of
Messrs. Nosker, Porter, and Beducian will relate to the contents
of certain records of the Bank of Powhatan, Powhatan, Virginia,
including reports of examination of the Bank of Powhatan prepared
by examiners for your Bank, dated November 18, 1961, May 7, 1962,
June 3, 1963, and August 7, 1963. The production of these reports
and related materials by officials of the Bank of Powhatan we
understand to have been ordered by District Court Judge John D.
Butzner on November 20, 1964.
The Board authorizes Messrs. Nosker, Porter, and Beducian
to appear in District Court in response to the subpoenas issued and
to give such testimony as may be required. Inasmuch as the subPoenas do not call for the production of documents by the witnesses,
the authorization herein given does not extend to production by
the witnesses of any documents from your Bank's files.
In respect to the testimony that may be given by members
of your Bank's staff, it is understood that you, as General Counsel
ef the Bank, will be permitted to enter a limited appearance before
the Court and, through the Assistant United States Attorney who is

Ili

HOARD

Mr, W. S. Farmer

OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

-2-

prosecuting the case, make known any objection which you may have
to any line of questioning addressed to your Bank's employees. It
is suggested that you endeavor, to the fullest extent possible
under your limited appearance, to have the testimony of your Bank's
employees restricted to matters commented upon in the aforementioned
reports of examination and related materials. It is further
suggested that steps be taken to assure that the trial record reflects the fact that Messrs. Nosker, Porter, and Beducian are
appearing in response to subpoenas issued at the request of the
United States, and that any testimony which is given without objection by you is given under prior authorization of the Board.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

(lOSti
TELEGRAM
LEASED WIRE SERVICE

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON

Item No. 16
11/27/64

November 27, 1964

QUACKENBUSH -- NEW YORK

Reur request today, Board approves designation of Robert Meyer
as special assistant examiner for Federal Reserve Bank of
New York to participate in examination of The Citizens Trust
Company of Schenectady, New York, Schenectady, New York.

(Signed) Elizabeth L. Carmichael
CARMICHAEL