View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

201
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Tuesday, November 242 1953. The Board
met in the Board Room at 10:20 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Szymczak
Evans
Vardaman
Robertson
Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Leonard, Director, Division of
Bank Operations
Mr. Vest, General Counsel
Mr. Hackley, Assistant General Counsel

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

There was presented a request that Mr. Allen, Director, Division of Personnel Administration, be authorized to travel to Kansas
City, Missouri, and St. Louis, Missouri, during the period December 24, 1953, to review the work of the personnel departments of the Federal
Reserve Banks of Kansas City and St. Louis.
Approved unanimously.
Prior to this meeting there had been circulated among the members of the Board a memorandum dated November 4, 1953, from Mr. Horbett,
Assistant Director, Division of Bank Operations, concerning the triennial
designation of central reserve and reserve cities, effective March 1, 1954,
pursuant to the rule adopted by the Board on December 19, 1947. Governor
Robertson and other members of the Board had requested that the matter be
discussed at a meeting, and subsequently there had been sent to the members




-2-

11/24/53

of the Board for further review copies of Mr. Horbett's memorandum
and related papers, including a draft of letter to the Federal Reserve
Banks, together with copies of the entry from the record of policy
actions in the Board's 1947 Annual Report discussing the adoption of
the present formula for the classification of central reserve and reserve cities.
At the request of the Board, Mr. Leonard reviewed the development and adoption of the formula and actions taken thereunder in 1948
and 1951. Mr. Leonard's comments were followed by a discussion of the
operation of the formula and the desirability of requiring that all
member banks (exclusive of banks in outlying sections authorized to
carry reduced reserves) must join in a request that a reserve city designation be continued when it would otherwise be terminated under the
formula.
At the conclusion of the discussion, unanimous approval was
given to a letter to the Presidents
of all Federal Reserve Banks in the
following form:
This refers to the rule prescribing standards of classification of reserve cities and providing for a triennial designation of such cities, adopted by the Board on December 19,
1947. The rule appears on pages 86-87 of the Board's 1947
Annual Report.
As a basis of the action which the Board will take under
the rule effective March 1, 1954, the enclosed table has been
prepared showing total deposits, total demand deposits, and
interbank demand deposits of member banks in reserve cities
other than Federal Reserve Bank and Branch cities, and in nonreserve cities with a large volume of interbank demand deposits,




21
11/24/53

-3-

s. The
together with two interbank demand deposit ratio
er 10,
figures of deposits are averages of call dates Octob
ses,
purpo
e
1951 to June 30, 1953, inclusive. For comparativ
the
for
interbank demand deposits ratios are also shown
period December 312 1948 to June 302 1950.
ional reAs you will observe from the table, no addit
ve city desigserve cities will be designated, and the reser
will be continued,
nation of each of the following nine cities
in the city
effective March 1, 19542 only if all member banks
ict of such city
distr
ing
outly
an
in
(exclusive of any member bank
reduced reserves)
permitted by the Board of Governors to maintain
ded under the
request continuation of the designation as provi
s:
citie
ve
reser
rule for classification of
St. Joseph, Missouri
Lincoln, Nebraska
Topeka, Kansas
Sioux City, Iowa
Pueblo, Colorado
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Dubuque, Iowa
Kansas City, Kansas
Toledo, Ohio
member bank
Please advise each member bank (exclusive of any
cities
above
the
of
any
in
ves)
permitted to carry reduced reser
rule,
the
in
ded
provi
As
tion.
in your District as to the situa
should
n
natio
desig
city
ve
reser
the
a request for continuation of
of the bankts
be accompanied by a certified copy of a resolution
received by
be
and
st
reque
board of directors authorizing such
1954.
15,
ary
Febru
than
the Federal Reserve Bank not later
Board as
the
to
rd
forwa
will
It will be appreciated if you
from
Bank
your
by
ved
recei
promptly as convenient all requests
s.
statu
city
ve
reser
the
of
the member banks for continuance
their
t
permi
to
late
too
Should any such requests be received
1954, it is
being forwarded to reach the Board by February 16,
receipt of
the
of
wire
by
requested that you advise the Board
such requests.
in your disIn response to appropriate inquiries you may,
regarding the
n
herei
ined
conta
cretion, give out the information
indicated redesignations and terminations.
from the meetMessrs. Leonard, Vest, and Hackley then withdrew
ing.
to action
Reference was made to the practice instituted pursuant
tion cards are sent
of the Board on September 270 1951, whereby identifica
dents and
each year to Federal Reserve Bank and branch directors, Presi




2fl
-4-

11/24/53

are
other officers of Federal Reserve Banks and branches whose names
ary
listed in the Federal Reserve Bulletin, and the members and secret
of the Federal Advisory Council.

Question was raised as to whether

there was justification for continuing the practice.
Following a discussion of the matter, during which various
be taken
views were expressed, Chairman Martin suggested that no action
Presidents of
at this time but that the comments of the Chairmen and
of the
the Federal Reserve Banks be obtained during the conferences
two groups in December.
Chairman Martin's suggestion
was approved unanimously.
The Board then went into executive session, after which the Secretary
was informed by the Chairman that during the session unanimous approval WAS
given to the following letter to Mr.
Parten, Chairman of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas, which had been prepared
for Chairman Martin's signature in accordance with suggestions made in the
course of informal discussions at
earlier meetings of members of the
Board:
ce,
This will refer to our conversations and corresponden
the
to
t
respec
with
13th,
er
Novemb
of
especially your letter
of Dallas.
selection of a President of the Federal Reserve Bank
a
of
Federal
ent
Presid
a
of
tment
appoin
As you know, the
e prostatut
the
since
ty,
sibili
Reserve Bank is a &Al respon
ors
of
Direct
Board
the
by
vides that he shall be appointed
rethe
is
It
ors.
Govern
with the approval of the Board of
poss
of
canvas
full
a
make
sponsibility of the Directors to
ble
availa
ied
man
qualif
best
sible appointees and to select the
five
of
a
term
for
is
tment
for the appointment. The appoin
years, and because of the importance of the position, the approval of the Board of Governors cannot be lightly given.




20f

11/24/53

-5-

Whenever the Board feels that a person proposed for apns
pointment as President does not have the qualificatio
to
rove.
disapp
necessary for the position, it is its duty
When Mr. Gilbert was reappointed President in 1951,
e
the Board indicated that it would be willing to approv
tandunders
clear
the reappointment of Mr. Gentry with the
and that
ing that he would resign when Mr. Gilbert retired,
Vice
the question whether Mr. Gentry was continued as First
wanted
President would depend on whether the new President
him in that office. You later informed the Board that Mr.
Gentry was entirely willing to resign as First Vice Presias
dent, to take effect with the retirement of Mr. Gilbert,
Presithe
he (Mr. Gentry) took the commendable position that
the
dent of a Federal Reserve Bank should have a voice in
not want
selection of the First Vice President and he would
to the
to serve in that capacity if he were not acceptable
President.
While we appreciate very much the service which Mr.
ue
Gentry has given the System over many years, MB contin
e
provid
to
ied
qualif
not
is
he
to be of the opinion that
e
Bank
Reserv
l
Federa
the
enable
the leadership necessary to
l
of Dallas to take its proper place as part of the centra
ore,
theref
that,
and
States
banking system of the United
apin the best interests of the Federal Reserve System his
ed.
be
approv
not
pointment to the presidency should
There have been rumors that two or more members of the
Board of Governors seek appointment as President of the
Dallas Bank. These rumors are utterly false. Each member
of the Board has stated that he is not interested in the
were
job and would decline to accept the appointment if it
tendered to him.
of
Your letter indicates the possibility that members
ors
Govern
of
Board
the
with
your Board might wish to meet
in Washington. We would welcome such a meeting in order
apthat each of us - all members of the same team - might
views.
tive
respec
our
preciate more fully the basis of
The meeting then adjourned.

During the day the following ad-

the members present:
ditional actions were taken by the Board with all of
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on November 23, 1953, were approved unanimously.




201(k
-6-

11/24/53

Telegram to Mr. M. Moss Alexander, President, Missouri-Portland
Cement Company, St. Louis, Missouri, prepared pursuant to action taken at

16, 1953, and reading as follows:

the meeting on November

Board of Governors has appointed you Class C director of
the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis for three-year term beginning January 1, 1954, has designated you Chairman and Federal Reserve Agent at the Bank for the year 1954, and has
fixed your compensation as such on uniform basis fixed for
same position at other Federal Reserve Banks, i.e., at same
amount as aggregate of fees payable during same period to
any other director for attendance corresponding to yours
at meetings of board of directors, executive committee, and
other committees of board of directors.
Your acceptance by collect telegram will be appreciated.
The Board will issue later a press statement on appointments of directors at all Federal Reserve Banks and Branches.
It would be appreciated if announcement of your appointment
could be deferred until release of Board statement.
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. Caffey Robertson, President, Caffey Robertson
Company, Memphis, Tennessee, prepared pursuant to action taken at the
meeting on November 16,

1953, and reading as follows:

Board of Governors has appointed you as Class C director
of Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis effective January 1, 1954,
for unexpired portion of term ending December 31, 1955, and
will be pleased to have your acceptance by collect telegram.
As you know, the Board will issue later a press statement
on appointments of directors at all Federal Reserve Banks and
Branches. It would be appreciated if any announcement of your
appointment could be deferred until release of Board 13 statement.
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. Leslie N. Perrin, Director, General Mills, Inc.,
Minneapolis, Minnesota, prepared pursuant to action taken at the meeting




-7-

11/24/53

on November 162 1953, and reading as follows:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has
appointed you Class C director of Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis for three-year term beginning January 1, 1954,
and will be pleased to have your acceptance by collect telegram.
It is understood that you will relinquish all commercial bank affiliations and dispose of any bank stock you
may own in order to qualify as Class C director.
The Board will issue later a press statement on appointments of directors at all Federal Reserve Banks and
Branches. It would be appreciated if any announcement of
your appointment could be deferred until release of Board's
statement.
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. Phillip I. Welk, Vice President, Preston-Shaffer
Milling Company, Walla Walla, Washington, prepared pursuant to action
taken at the meeting on November 20, 1953, and reading as follows:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has
appointed you director of the Portland Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco for two-year term beginning January 1, 1954, and will be pleased to have your
acceptance by collect telegram.
It is understood that you are not a director of a bank
and do not hold public or political office. Should your
situation in these respects change during the tenure of
your appointment, it will be appreciated if you advise
the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
Board will issue later a press statement on appointments of directors at all Federal Reserve Banks and Branches.
Would be appreciated if any announcement of your appointment
could be deferred until release of Board's statement.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Meyer, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago, reading as follows:




11/24/53

-8-

In accordance with the request contained in your
letter of November 13, 1953, the Board of Governors
approves the payment of salaries to Frank Biess and
Wilhelm Lange, Night Janitors, at the rate of $3,877
per annum, which is $367 in excess of the maximum established for the grade in which their jobs are classified.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Peterson, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank
of St. Louis, reading as follows:
This refers to your letter of October 23, 1953,
requesting an interpretation by the Board of the language contained in section 8 of Regulation F that a
committee of directors shall "at least once during
each period of twelve months" make or have made an
audit of the trust department of each national bank.
The specific question is whether this provision
means that such audits must be made at intervals of
not more than twelve months or may be made at least
once during each calendar year.
The language "at least once during each period
of twelve months" also appears in section 6(c) of
Regulation F, relating to the review of trust assets
by trust investment committees, and in section 17(c)(3)
of Regulation F p relating to audits of common trust
funds. It is the Board's opinion that the correct interpretation of this language in each instance is that
not more than twelve months shall elapse without the
required action being taken.




Approved unanimously, with
the understanding that copies of
the letter would be sent to the
Presidents of all Federal Reserve
Banks for their information.