View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Pederai Miniltes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Reserve s.yetem on
Tuesday, November 23 1948. The Board
wae Board
Room
PRESEUT
: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr,
Mr.
Mr,

at 10:30
"inMcCabe, Chairman
Eccles
Szymczak
Draper
Evans
Vardaman
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr,
Mr,
Mr.
Mr*
Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Morrill, Special Adviser
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Smead„ Director of the Division of
Bank Operations
Thomas, Director of the Division of
Research and Statistics
Vest, General Counsel
Young, Associate Director of the Di—
vision of Research and Statistics
Leonard, Associate Director of the
Division of Bank Operations
Horbett, Assistant Director of the
Division of Bank Operations

Reference was
made to a memorandum from Mr. Smead prepared
14141'
date of
101)1}
November 222 1948, pursuant to the discussion at the
'''
keetg
of the
Board and the Presidents of the Federal Reserve
ri
October 5,
1948/ concerning the proposal contained in the
letter or
Ilit
ootober 22, 1947, to the Presidents of all Federal
300t , '44its that
member banks having a daily average of more than
4
tteks
payable in the territory of another Federal Reserve




11/2348
...,)...
klIk Or branch
be reauired either to route such items direct or sort
kd
list them
separately• The memorandum stated that the number of
deposit
4414
ing with Federal Reserve Banks a daily average of more
the41300 cash
items payable in the territory of another Federal Re—
eBankor
branch declined from 60 in August 1947 to 38
in June
1k3)that
assurances had been received from several of the 38 banks
tIle
wleYliould b
egin sending direct in the near future, and that most
of the
81111.t..
r7aining cases
involved items payable in States which were
21 pet14"11.

Federal Reserve districts, particularly in the Chi—
Pecieral Reserve
kart,
Reserve Dist
The memorandum recommended that the
tleetizie:ncur in
the action of the Conference of Presidents at its
°'

°n

October 1,
?Nid
1948, in approving a recommendation from the
exIts'
Ns t
Conference's Committee on Operations that the Bonrd's pro—
4not
,,z.zii ite
effectuated, with the understanding (1) that the Fed—
would continue their efforts to get member banks
dire
lite
ct in all
cases where the volume
that the
e'srktheectFederal Reserve Banks at least
once ay
)ear for
warrants;(2
i:h
respect
to the failure of manber banks to route direct
'i they
had a.
t t,..
daily average of more than 300 items payable in the
Of another
Federal Reserve Bank or branch; and (3) that
%Ilt:4 IleXt reports
were received, the Board would again review the
n Qt11311 Igith
aDit
respect to
in
member
I ttt
t
el:te".
There
lao:::::
to
i::::cdh:adw:oo:h:
titi

-

the Federal Reserve
Banks outlining the procedure proposed
Ilbcrve
recommendati°n.




11/23/48
—3_
There was
'Eccles
81101alti

a discussion of the memorandum, in the course of

suggested that the question whether member banks

getle direct-send
should not be left optional with them, but that
itshe
:
al rule

requiring such procedure eventually should be estab-

'and that individual exceptions be made in any instance in
ered that it would be undesirable to require a bank to
coy. "
LuPly. a
e 8180 suggested that the Federal Reserve Banks be reCIlle te
to report at
progress being
intervals of approximately three months as to
cash

made in getting the remaining banks to direct—

ite„, and
that they be informed that the Board would ex-

th
'
It Idthi„
'11*t41
'there
t‘4

Year the Reserve Banks should be able to determine
__
wel-e any
cases in which exceptions should be made to

Pr°Pcsal.
UPon motion by Mr. Draper, Mr.
14cles t suggestions were approved
1Tan .mously,
1
with the understanding
'
,flat Mr.
Smend would revise the
raft letter to the Presidents of
the
Federal Reserve Banks along the
1Illes indicated in the discussion.

17, 1941:hell

presented a memorandum from Mr. Vest dated November

Stating tha
t the
l ed the
Economic Cooperation Administration had
Tr.easury that it desired to establish a procedure where4e tact"
:,
ltles of
441It
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, as Fiscal

°f* th

'tta dr
Iqt1

tirlited States, would be utilized in the payment of
°fl the Economic Cooperation Administration by partici-

01111Ltrtes, and
that in response to a letter from the Treasury




4 0:
11/2348
-4-

the
Federal

Reserve Bank of New York had suggested that, in view or

the k'ssibility
that the arrangement might deprive commercial banks
°tbusiness which
they
currently performing for the Economic Coweropti
Administration in making payments under letters of credit,
the services
the Reserve
Bank would perform be limited to paying
4aftsdrawn in
the United States to the order of domestic suppliers.
Mr.
Vardaman stated that he had requested that the memorandum
h
circulated 1Ong
the members of the Board prior to consideration
4t
4

teeting

because it appeared to him that this was another in-

qkee

Which a

Government agency was proposing to encroach on

1)1‘111qe
bUsiness, that
he was opposed to such encroachment, and that
qr°/1glY
favorPd the
suggestion made by the New York Bank that its
4riiice8 be
limited in such a
way as to avoid as much as possible
4titiori
with
commercial banks.
I/1 a
sto
discussion of the matter, Mr. Vardaman said that he under-

11

40

h
that
e

Was called for by the Board at this time, but

l'ranted the
record to show his objection to any arrangement
//c11-1d en
croach on
the proper activities of commercial banks.
Rel'erence
was then made to a memorandum from Mr. Leonard dated
41141„ 5,
a.r1,44e
l94,
With respect to a suggestion by Mr. Vardaman that
aillts be
made
whereby representatives of Reserve Banks, on a
"ive basts
)
representatives of the DiviParticipate
with
(1 84111t Operations in the field surveys which the Division makes




1
11/2348
-5(Itvari°u3 °Perations of Reserve Banks. The memorandum stated that
t1113r°Posal
should be adopted if satisfactory arrangements could be
(1.cle
with
the
Reserve Banks and it suggested that the matter be taken
iliformally with
the Chairman of the Presidents' Conference's Corn,
tte
011
Operations to determine whether such arrangements could be

:
Mr Vardaman stated that he felt such arrangements would be
berlefieta
Ittlid 47I to the Reserve Banks in that representatives from one Bank
eNt:,

oPPortunity to
get the benefit of observations of op—
in other Reserve Banks.
Sinead stated
that he concurred in the suggestion.
Following a discussion, upon
motion by Mr. Vardaman,, h pro—
cedure proposed in the memorandum
was approved unanimously.

iler°re this me,
.ti11p. there had been sent to each member of the
vttl reac°Pli of
a
Memorandum dated November 9/ 1948, from Mr. Smead
IlesPeeet to
larger additions to the contingent reserves of Fed—
194, 1*'4'sr
BarIke which
was discussed at the meeting on October 27,
The rtiA,,
ti,4
-aorandtun
a
stated that, in view of present market condi—
ailci
ti) t4
the Policy
of the Federal Reserve System with respect
9Port of
the Government bond market, it would not seem un—
NItt

f°1* the Federal
Reserve Banks to build up promptly their
Nilaxa
re8erve5 to
a Point equal to the premium account, that
°4 Cl°"I'llmrant securities held by the Federal Reserve




11/23/4
8
—0—

kits on

November 3/ 1948, amounted to $83,863,0001 that ,9t the end

(If 1948

reserves for
contingencies (assuming $15 million would be
added to
such
reserves from the last Quarter earnings of this year)
'c'tlicitotaa
$58
million, and that if additions to contingent reserves
l'tere
continued at the
rate of $15 million a quarter the total of
811ch
reserves at
the end of June 1949 would exceed the present pre1111111 On
securities.
ditions
Stead.

With respect to the question whether such ad-

should be
placed in the surplus accounts of the Reserve Banks
°f

being

44ted that

4

carried as reserves for contingencies, the memorandum

further increase in surplus would necessitate reducing

Ill'419° Per
cent
t4t if that ratiothe portion of net earnings payable to the Treasury,
b1e

were reduced it would no doubt occasion considere°111naeht in
the financial
press, and that for the present it would
4" best t„
t110
continue the practice of adding such amounts as are
tight
desirable to
reserves.
contingent
1114' Eccles stated that at the meeting with the Presldents on
°t(lber 5,
1948,
there
waS a strong feeling in favor of increasing

t,h11/1tthheld by the
Federal Reserve Banks before making the
v%ellt
to

the

that he felt the reserve should be brought
TreasurY1
exIount of
the premium on Government securities as quickly
le, that the
premium on securities purchased by the System
14r.gelY from
the fact that the Treasury was unwilling to
cihe
the

short-term rate to
advance as it should do in a period of

emLrld

for

credit which caused the intermediate issues to sell




1N4
—74t

a

higher

premium, and that as long as the System was under obli—

ga'ti011 to Purchase such issues it should be in a position to offset
tile
Preziums
paid. He suggested, therefore, that there be withheld
tr°tReserve Bank
earnings during the last quarter of 1948 an amount
silf"cient to bring
contingent reserves to the amount of premiums
41 Reserve SYs tem
holdIngs of Government bonds and that the reserve

be tl‘1148terred to
10trin. _ 0
58.
There Was
eNrs

surplus unless there was a valid reason for not

a discussion of Mr. Eccles' proposals, in the

e °fWhich

it was
suggested that the matter be discussed with
Prew,e
4-Q nts
at their
1941,
joint meeting with the Board on December 1,

the

(1141ag

which the Board would again consider the matter.
This suggestion was approved
unanimoui
i.

Mr.
Vardaman referredto a memorandum dated October 19,
1948,
various

44a1

aspects

Reserve

Bank of
st.

the

9) 1948.

of

action

the

official personnel problem at the

Louis

prepared by Mr. Morrill in accord—

taken at the meeting of the Board on September

Copies of
the memorandum were sent to each member of the
at of
October 25, 1948.
Mr,
vardaman.
the
stated that there had been numerous discussions
officer
personnel of the St. Louis Bank at meetings of the
e'v r'
the
past
two
that Mr. Morrill's memorandum had
b'.4Npareci.
years'
as a
result of a suggestion which he (Mr. Vardaman)




, 4 A
11/2348
-8-de) and
the

that he felt
that action taken by the Board in calling to

attention of the
Chairman of the St. Louis Bank the need for
s°1714g the
problems With respect to the officer personnel would
strengthen the
hands of the Chairman and President of the Bank in
bt'illgitig about
changes which they had recognized were needed.
14 this
connection Chairman McCabe stated that although he
had
talked
with Mr.
to
Davis, President of the St. Louis Bank, pursuant
the
on June 25, 1948, he had not been
able touncierstanding at the
meeting
talk
with
Chairnan DearmcInt but had written him asking that
e
was in
Washingt
on at
of the forthcoming Chairmen's
the
time
eclireretce he
take such
he
time as might be necessary for discussion of
etitire
officer
personnel at the Bank.
Following a
discussion, it was
agreed unanimously that Chairman
McCabe should discuss the matter
with Mr.
Dearmont when he was in
'1,1!.shingt0n at the time of the next
'14irmen's Conference. In taking
this action, it was understood that
Cha-irman
McCabe would use his judgment as to
whether a copy of Mr.
14°111111's memorandum should be fur,
11811ed to Mr. Dearmont before or at
he
time of the discussion.
8efort s
meeting a copy of a memorandum from Mr. Thomas
NOV
elzbet.
t1Q1,
2
te.zea
'1948) entLtled "Considerations Regarding Further
La P.
A, --8ervp ,Lequirements" was sent to each member of the
LL
Eccles,
Nviel,red
suggestion the Secretary read the memorandum,
the
.
utisic economic situation and outlined prospective




4/23/48
-94'"°Pments
-4ring the remainder of this year, during the first two
or three
weeks of
January 1949, and during the period from then unthe end of
the fiscal year.

The memorandum also discussed the

4:"°ra.11 increase
in reserve requirements and suggested alterna-ivi
procedures with
respect to the timing of an increase in require411" Buell action
Should be taken.
tliatth Ine°11n ction with a statement contained in the memorandum
tore
:
TreasurY would continue during the remainder of this year
4"ilis at
the rate of $100 million a week while maintaining

t4,381
:
4Ce8 at the
Nt4

Federal Reserve Banks, Mr. Vardaman asked whether

g'estiolck had been
discussed with the Treasury.

Mr. Thomas

°ftl.4e
, tlit
Tr he talked with Mr. Bartelt, Fiscal Assistant Secretary
4tt)lis 78u17) 14110 stated that while no commitment would be made
to,

trle
'the Probabilities were that the Treasury would continue

44 its

balances for
retiring bills during the remainder of this

There was a general discussion of the
memorandum, and it was the consensus that
110 action
with respect to a change in reye
requirements should be taken at this
r'lle, but that the matter should be given
Burtner consideration at a meeting of the
°ard on Friday, December 3, 1948.
Nrin
14 1,e_
g the d
iscussion of the question of a possible increase
44 2eN re .
t1141,
g'
llrements, reference was made to a memorandum dated
19, 19
sent to Chairman McCabe by Mr. Burgess, member of




1969
11/23/48
the

—10—
Federal

Advisory Council from the Second Federal Reserve District,

°11t4tling a
Ike read an proposal for a capital goods committee. The memorandum
d it was
agreed that a copy should be sent to each mem—
the
Board for
consideration.
ClUdrtan McCabe
reported that he had received a call from Mr.
11-8e' Chairman
of the Council of Economic Advisers, in which he had
2tqed
that the
President had asked him to serve as coordinator of
ProPosale am
suggestions in connection with the economic problems
t4ethg
the
GovernmentthEtt he
Mr• Nourse stated, Chairman McCabe said,
%/as
C411ing a
Zo
of a small group tomorrow afternoon to
over
meeting
the Ina
tter and would
like to have him (Chairman McCabe) atttid* Re
added
that
parentl:x:::dmeoevteirn:
44*1'
orleettngs that
wcooun

1N-range
taa
tters.
At
t%44rcl,
11‘t11

this

polic:ou
pI
rd
Isdbe:
:
:
:
roee
in fp
cie
urr
rsi
rto
e::
:
::y—
oblems as distinguished

Point Messrs. Riefler, Smead, Thomas, Vest, Young,

ahd

Horbett
withdrew from the meeting and the action stated
l'eaPeet to
each Of the
matters hereinafter referred to was
the Boc,rd:
14h,
Ute
erve

of actions
taken by the Board of Governors of the Fed-

48tem on
November 22, 1948, were approved unanimously.
Telegrni to
Mr.
Ileae
Purrington, Assistant Vice President of the
rile
Bank of
Chicago, reading as follows:




1970
11/23/
-11HR1
lath. Board authorizes your Bank not to.asIlii
8 Penalty incurred by Merchants National Bank, Chicago,
Now,11,
°18, for
'
111°er 4 anddeficient reserves during periods ending
11."
Approved unanimously.
couli

Memorandum dated November
22, 1948, from Mr. Vest, General

recommending, for the reasons stated in the memorandum,
be
authorized to serve as an advisory member of the Legal
S4e°rIlraittee
of tile presidet
:
e Po
si
t nted by the Chairman of the Insurance
Committee

'Qat

A.

Conference to study the revision of the Loss
ent of the
Federal Reserve Banks.




Approved unanimously.