View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for November 2, 1960

To:

Members of the Board

From: Office of the Secretary

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard to
the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will advise
the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, please initial below.
If you were present at the meeting, your initials will
indicate approval of the minutes. If you were not present,
your initials will indicate only that you have seen the
minutes.




Chin. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. King

1
Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
Wednesday, November 2, 1960.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

The Board met in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
Mills
Robertson
Shepardson
Sherman, Secretary
Thomas, Adviser to the Board
Young, Adviser to the Board
Shay, Legislative Counsel
Fauver, Assistant to the Board
Hackley, General Counsel
Noyes, Director, Division of
Research and Statistics
Mr. Marget, Director, Division of
International Finance
Mr. Solomon, Director, Division of
Examinations
Mr. Koch, Adviser, Division of Research
and Statistics
Mr. Furth, Associate Adviser, Division of
International Finance
Mr. Sammons, Associate Adviser, Division of
International Finance
Mr. Benner, Assistant Director, Division of
Examinations
Mr. Smith, Assistant Director, Division of
Examinations
Mr. Landry, Assistant to the Secretary
Mr. Young, Assistant Counsel
Mr. Leavitt, Supervisory Review Examiner,
Division of Examinations
Messrs. Katz, Wood, Anderson, Dahl, Gekker,
Maroni, and Reynolds, and Miss Logue of
the Division of International Finance

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Report by Mr. Furth.

Mr. Furth reported on conversations with

bankers and leading economists during his recent visits in Luxembourg,
Austria, West Germany, The Netherlands, and Switzerland.




-2-

11/2/60

At the conclusion of this report Messrs. Thomas, Ralph Young, and
Noyes withdrew, as did all members of the Division of International Finance
who had been present.
North Shore Bank of Miami (Item No. 1).

There had been distributed

under date of November 1, 1960, a memorandum from the Division of Examinations concerning a request from Mr. Stanley Brons, Assistant United States
Attorney in Miami, Florida, for the services of two additional Federal Reserve
examiners and the use of confidential sections of reports of examination of
the North Shore Bank, Miami Beach.

As noted in the memorandum, the Board on

October 24, 1960, approved the request of the Assistant Attorney General,
United States Department of Justice, that an examiner be sent to Miami to
provide information on banking practices in connection with the preparation
Of a case against directors of North Shore Bank which involved criminal
conspiracy charges.

Reference was also made in the memorandum to Board

approval at that time of sending with the examiner, for review by the
United States Attorney, such records as the Federal Reserve Bank of
Atlanta considered pertinent.
Mr. Solomon stated that in compliance with the foregoing arrangements an examiner had been sent by the Atlanta Reserve Bank to Miami to
report on October 31.

On the following day, however, Mr. Brons telephoned

the Division of Examinations to state that he would require the services
of all examiners who had examined the North Shore Bank and to request the
privilege of seeing the confidential sections of all examination reports




of the bank.

Mr. Brons was prepared, if necessary, to subpoena the two

examiners remaining in the employ of the Reserve Bank who had examined
the North Shore Bank.
It was the recommendation of the Division of Examinations, Mr.
Solomon said, that these two examiners be sent to Miami but that the
confidential sections of examination reports not be made available to
the United States Attorney.

This would be in accord with the position

taken by the Comptroller's Office in response to a similar request.

Mr.

Solomon noted that in addition to the question of sending the two examiners and making available the confidential sections of the examination
reports, there was a question as to the use to be made of the open
sections of the examination reports.
Mr. Hackley said that the Legal Division agreed with the recommendations of the Division of Examinations.

He noted that the subpoena

power could be used by the Justice Department to obtain the services of
the examiners.

If at all possible, however, he considered it advisable

to avoid making examination reports available to the United States
Attorney, particularly the confidential sections.
Governor Mills reiterated his position on this issue, which had
been that it was proper for examiners to appear as expert witnesses, but
that their assistance to the Justice Department should be limited to the
giving of technical advice and that Justice should not be permitted to
draw evidence from the examination reports.




He believed that under the

-4-

11/2/6o

Board's Rules of Organization it would be possible to decline to answer
a subpoena; however, should the Board be requested by the courts to make
examination reports available, it apparently would be necessary for the
Board to comply.

Under no circumstances did he feel that it would be

proper to produce for the Department of Justice the reports of examination, which were in his opinion confidential as between the bank
examined and the Federal supervisory authority, and which involved a
confidential relationship between the bank and its customers that he
felt should not be permitted to escape through a court proceeding.
Governor Robertson expressed himself in favor of sending the
two examiners, as requested by the United States Attorney.

He would

not make the confidential sections of examination reports available,
believing that those sections should remain confidential between the
examiner and the supervisory authority.

With respect to the open

sections of examination reports, he felt they should be made available
and that the Board should not require that a subpoena be issued to do
SO.

It was Governor Robertson's view that it was a part of the Board's

responsibility as a government agency to cooperate with the chief law
enforcement agency.

In making the reports available, he would inform

the United States Attorney that they were confidential and were not
to be used in evidence except with respect to the specific charge
before the court.

He went on to say that during the 19301s, when

there were many prosecutions of the type involved in the present case,




-5-

11/2/60

there was no release of the confidential sections of examination reports.
However, portions of the open sections had been used with respect to
specific transactions.

On such occasions the judge often examined the

reports in chambers, thereby obviating the need for introducing the
reports in evidence.
After other members of the Board had indicated that they were
inclined to agree with Governor Robertsonts suggestion, Governor Mills
said that he would wish to have the record show his dissent to making
the examination reports available on this basis.

To clarify his views,

he believed that if an examiner were put on the stand it would be proper
for him to give testimony as to the function of the examiner and the
scope of his responsibilities as they would apply generally to the
examination of banks.

He should not, however, testify as to the par-

ticulars of a case except if he was subject to a subpoena that was
being enforced by a Federal court.
In replying to a question from the Chairman as to precedent
in such cases, Mr. Solomon said that from time to time requests had
been received for examiners to testify in connection with defalcations,
robberies, and similar charges, usually for the purpose of identifying
Specific facts such as serial numbers of currency and the like.

He

could not recall any instances in which a Federal Reserve examiner had
worked closely with the Department of Justice in the preparation of a
case although he understood that examiners of the Federal Deposit




-6-

11/2/6o

Insurance Corporation frequently did so, presumably because the Corporation was more frequently involved in defalcations or other irregularities
in banks.
Mr. Benner commented that he could recall no similar case in which
the System had made examiners available to the Department of Justice.

He

also noted that the confidential sections of certain of the reports of
examination of North Shore Bank contained comments, such as comments on
an officer of the bank, that it would seem undesirable to make public.
In the subsequent discussion it was brought out that part of the
case against North Shore Bank revolved around the fact that the bank had
lent funds to companies controlled by directors which were technically
affiliates of the bank.

However, the bank had denied in writing that

such affiliations existed when asked this question by examiners of the
Atlanta Reserve Bank.

Therefore, these affiliations had not been listed

in the reports of examination.
After considerable discussion of the extent to which the examiners
of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta might testify in this case, during
-which there was general agreement that under no circumstances should the
content of the confidential sections of examination reports be reviewed
or used as a basis for comment by the examiners, Chairman Martin suggested
that the Board authorize two examiners of the Atlanta Reserve Bank to go
to Miami for the purpose of assisting the Assistant United States Attorney
along the lines discussed at this meeting; that is, they could cooperate




-7-

11/2/60

as experts in supplying information revealed in the open section of the
reports of examinations of North Shore Bank but they should not provide
information based on the confidential sections of the reports.

He sug-

gested that the examiners should be briefed on the extent to which they
should comment and that since the Assistant United States Attorney had
indicated that their services would be needed for only about one day
they could be asked to keep the Board informed of any further developments, such as a request after reaching Miami that they provide
information beyond the facts that could be obtained from the open
section of the examination reports.
Governor Mills' views as stated during the meeting having been
noted, there was agreement that the Assistant United States Attorney in
Miami should be advised that the two examiners would go to Miami and that
the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta should be informed of the conditions
under which the examiners were to be sent and of the extent to which they
were authorized to make available information from the reports of examination.
Secretaryta Note: Later in the day a telegram
was sent to Mr. Sheffer, Chief Examiner, Federal
Reserve Bank of Atlanta, in the form of attached
Item No. 1.
Messrs. Benner and Walter Young then withdrew from the meeting.
Application to organize a national bank at Delcambre, Louisiana
(Item No. 2).




There had been circulated under date of October 17, 1960,

-8-

11/2/60

a memorandum from the Division of Examinations submitting a draft of
letter to the Comptroller of the Currency recommending unfavorably with
respect to an application to organize a national bank at Delcambre,
Louisiana.

A similar recommendation had been made by the Federal

Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

When the file was in circulation, Governor

Robertson indicated that he had a question concerning the recommendation.
Governor Robertson referred to the location and population of
the community of Delcambre and pointed out that, unlike neighboring
communities, it had no banking facilities.

He also noted that the

proposed directors of the national bank were among the most influential
businessmen in the town and were in a good financial position.
In discussion, during which the situation was reviewed in more
detail, it was brought out that although branch banking is permissible
under Louisiana law, none of the nearby banks had sought to establish
a branch in Delcambre.

In the course of the discussion, a majority of

the Board members indicated that they would go along with the recommendation of the Reserve Bank in the absence of stronger evidence that
a bank was needed in Delcambre.

Accordingly, the letter to the Comptroller

of the Currency recommending unfavorably on the application was approved,
Governors Balderston and Robertson dissenting.

A copy of the letter is

attached as Item No. 2.
Mr. Leavitt then withdrew from the meeting.




,rf

11/2/60

-9St. Joseph Agency (Item No. 3).

Distribution had been made of a

memorandum from the Legal Division dated November 1, 1960, concerning
arrangements for a hearing on the application of St. Joseph Agency, Inc.,
South Bend, Indiana, for a determination under section 4(0(6) of the
Bank Holding Company Act with respect to its subsidiary, St. Joseph
Insurance Agency, Inc.

Attached to the memorandum was a draft of notice

of request and order for hearing thereon.

The hearing was set for

November 21, 1960, at the offices of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
and was to be conducted by Hearing Examiner Edward H. McMahan, whose
services had been arranged.

Mr. Gordon W. Lamphere, Assistant General

Counsel of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, was to be designated
as Board Counsel, in association with Mr. Paul C. Hodge, General Counsel
Of the Chicago Bank.
Without objection, the Notice of Request and Order for Hearing
Thereon was approved unanimously.

A copy is attached as Item No.

3.

Mr. Landry then withdrew from the meeting.
Report of examination—Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

Mr. Smith

commented on the examination of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago made
as of June 10, 1960, the report on which had completed circulation to the
members of the Board.

On the basis of his comments, it was agreed that

there were no matters disclosed by the examination which required action
on the part of the Board.
The meeting then adjourned.




11/2/60




-10Secretary's Notes: Governor Shepardson today
approved on behalf of the Board a letter to
the Director of the Graduate School, United
States Department of Agriculture, confirming
detailed arrangements for a thirty-two hour
training course in Technical Writing for
members of the Board's staff and authorizing
a contract fee of 31,200 to cover the total
cost of the program. (A letter was sent to
the Director of the Graduate School under
date of September 26, 1960, regarding tentative arrangements for the course, approval
of which is entered in the minutes of September 23.)
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in
a memorandum dated November 1, 1960, from
Mr. Fauver, Assistant to the Board, Governor
Shepardson today approved on behalf of the
Board a visit by a group of participants in
the Economic Development Institute sponsored
by the International Bank for Reconstruction
and Development on December 7, 1960, for a
program which would include luncheon in the
staff dining room.
Governor Shepardson also approved today on
behalf of the Board letters to the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York (attached Items 4
and 5)approving the appointment of Walter H.
Ludlum, Harry I. Stevens, Jr., and Matthew
T. Fitzpatrick as assistant examiners.
Upon consideration of a memorandum dated
November 2, 1960, from Mr. Sammons, Associate
Adviser, Division of International Finance,
Governor Shepardson authorized on behalf of
the Board a representation allowance not to
exceed $500 in connection with attendance of
certain members of the Board's staff at the
Sixth Meeting of Central Bank Technicians of
the American Continent to be held in Guatemala
from November 14 to November 25, 1960, such
attendance having been authorized by the Board
on March 3, 1960.

Secretary

TELEGRAM

Item No. 1
11/2/60

LEASED WIRE SERVICE

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON

November 2, 1960.

SHEFFER - ATLANTA

Board telegraphed Stanley Brons, Assistant United States Attorney,
Miami, Florida, today as follows:

"Answering your request, Board

approves sending to your office Examiners R. A. Sanders and J. L.
Hardin for questioning.

These men are engaged in important bank

examinations; hence, it is expected that your promise they would
be needed for about one day only will be observed.

Reserve Bank

Will be notified and will advise you when examiners will arrive.
Board regrets it cannot accede to your request to supply confidential
sections for your perusal."
Assistant Director.
Will arrive.

Telegram was signed by Henry Benner,

Suggest you advise Brons when two examiners

In preparation for questioning, examiners should review

Open sections of examination reports only and make no reference to
confidential sections.




(Signed) Merritt Sherman
SHERMAN

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
4.,0***44,0

OF THE

-

Item No. 2
11/2/60

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November 21 1960

Comptroller of the Currency,
Treasury Department,
Washington 251 D. C.
Attention Mr. C. C. Fleming,
Deputy Comptroller of the Currency.
Dear Mr. Comptroller:
Reference is made to your letter of May 241 1960,
enclosing copies of an application to organize a national bank
at Delcambre, Louisiana, and requesting a recommendation as to
whether or not the application should be approved.
A report of investigation of this application made by
an examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta indicates
favorable findings with respect to the proposed capital structure
and the convenience and needs of the community. Prospects for
earnings are not, however, particularly favorable, and the
relatively modest amount of business anticipated does not appear
to justify establishment of a commercial bank in the town at this
time. The management factor is also not considered satisfactory
as there is no one among the proposed officers or on the board of
directors who has had experience in either investments or loans.
Accordingly, the Board of Governors does not feel justified in
recommending approval of the application.
The Boardls Division of Examinations will be glad to
discuss any aspects of this case with representatives of your
office if you so desire.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Elizabeth L. Carmichael
Elizabeth L. Carmichael,
Assistant Secretary.

4 5 ,-)(1
Item No,

3

11/2/60
BOAJD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR DET7RMINATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 4(c)(6) OF
BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1956 AND
ORDER FOR HEARING THEREON

Notice is hereby given that request has been made to the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, pursuant to
section 4(c)(6) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 [12 U.S.C.
1843] and section 5(b) of the Boards Regulation Y [12 CFR 222.5(b))
by St. Joseph Agency, Inc., South Bend, Indiana, a bank holding
company, for a determination by said Board that the activities of
its subsidiary, St. Joseph Insurance Agency, Inc., an Indiana
corporation, are of the kind described in the aforementioned
sections of the Act and the Regulation so as to make it unnecessary
for the prohibitions of section 4 of the Act with respect to
shares in nonbanking organizations to apply in order to carry out
the purposes of the Act.
Inasmuch as section 4(c)(6) of the Bank Holding Company Act
of 1956 requires that any determination pursuant thereto be made
by the Board after due notice and hearing and on the basis of the
record made at such hearing,




4130

-2-

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED That pursuant to section 4(c)(6)
of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and in accordance with
sections 5(b) and 7(a) of the Boardis Regulation Y [12 CFR 222.5(b),
222.7(a)], promulgated under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,
a hearing with respect to this matter be held commencing on
November 21, 1960, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, before a duly selected
hearing officer, such hearing to be conducted in accordance with
the Rules of Practice for Formal Hearings of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System [12 CFR Part 263].

The right is

reserved to the Board or such hearing officer to designate any
Other date or place for such hearing or any part thereof which
may be determined to be necessary or appropriate for the convenience of the parties.

The Board's Rules of Practice for

Formal Hearings provide, in part, that "All such hearings shall be
Private and

shall be attended only by respondents and their

representatives or counsel, representatives of the Board, witnesses,
and other persons having an official interest in the proceedings;
Provided, however, That on the written request of one or more
respondents or counsel for the Board, or on its own motion, the
Board, when not prohibited by law, may permit other persons to
attend or may order the hearing to be public."




4
_3_
Any person desiring to give testimony in this proceeding
Should file with the ]ecretary of the Board, directly or through
the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, on or before November 14, 1960)
a written request containing a statement of the nature of the
petitionerls interest in the proceeding, and a summary of the
matters concerning which said petitioner wishes to give testimony.
Such request will be presented to the designated hearing officer
for his determination. Persons submitting timely requests will
be notified of the hearing officeris decision.
Dated at Washington, D. C., this 2nd day of November, 1960,
By order of the Board of Governors.
(Signed) i:erritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

(AL)




BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 4

11/2/60

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November 2, 1960

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
Mr. H. A. Bilby, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
New York 45, New York.
Dear Mr. Bilbyr
In accordance with the request contained in your
letter of October 27, 1960, the Board approves the appointment of Walter H. Ludlum and Harry I. Stevens, Jr. as
assistant examiners for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Please advise us of the effective dates of the appointments.
It is noted that Mr. Stevens owns 14 shares of
stock of The County Trust Company, White Plains, New York,
a State member bank, and that he plans to dispose of this
stock prior to accepting employment with your Bank. It is
also noted that Mr. Stevens is indebted to The County Trust
Company in the amount of $700, and to National Bank of
Westchester, Uhite Plains, New York, in the amount of $180.
Accordingly, the Board's approval of the appointment of
Mr. Stevens is given with the understanding that he will
not participate in any examination of these banks until his
indebtedness has been liquidated.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Elizabeth L. Carmichael
Elizabeth L. Carmichael,
Assistant Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

Item No. 5

11/2/60

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

November 21 1960

Mr. Howard D. Crosse, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
New York 45, New York.
Dear Mr. Crosse:
In accordance with the request contained in your
letter of October 281 19601 the Board approves the appointment of MatthewT. Fitzpatrick as an assistant examiner
for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Please advise
us of the effective date of the appointment.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Elizabeth L. Carmichael
Elizabeth L. Carmichael,
Assistant Secretary.