View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

CAO

S

/4.4t0,0.0

:
M
I 1114es of actions taken by the Boari of Governors of the

nya

°serve System on Tuesday, November 16, 1948.

The Board met

8°arci Room at
3:20 p.m.

PREsFaT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman pro tem.
Szymczak
Draper
Evans
Vardaman
Clayton
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Morrill, Special Adviser
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Vest, General Counsel
Thomas, Director of the Division of
Research and Statistics
Mr. Leonard, Associate Director of the
Division of Bank Operations
Mr. Young, Associate Director of the Di—
vision of Research and Statistics

tizic ci that tilrideisseustated
e
that Chairman McCabe would be delayed and had

A_

:

sion of matters on the docket proceed..

MI%
Claytoa

referred to the applications received from the Bank
fir'q'tea thirs&S.A.
for permission to establish foreign branches in
"
discussed at
earlier meetings of the Board and to the let—
tte
date of September 3, 1948, to Comptroller of the
"king for morr detailed comments relating to the

e

tl)leti
'
e of the
aPPlicatisonubsiBasehenk.otuslodasfbreiagehprptircbaoveledrite.lseH:entsatidoan
alj
'eh other

dividend
est o
pn
o1i

the

dtthhaetgu
a

16


reply

4/16/48
_
r'ecelved fro,
Comptroller Delano under date of September 20, 1948,
stet that it was the opinion of that office that, so fnr as monoNrwas
concerned, the question of foreign branches for the Bank of
involved the same
princiole as domestic branches, the differerieg O
nlY one of d
egree' Mr. Clayton stated that 8 letter was
'I-s()
sent to
Chairm
an Hanl of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
4.11er
dRte of
September 3) 1948) after Chairman Hani. indicated thnt the
Cc`rPoN.tion h.P,c1
an interest
in the opening of additional branches of
111Y
ilisured
bank, but that
no resoonse had been received thus far.
Clayton said that
an additional application from Bank of
k'Irica'
reouesting
t'llteh

permission to establish a branch at Bangkok, Siam,

aPPlicPtion was
'
''''s riw
referred to at the meeting on October 19, 1948,
under
t°
consideration, and that the ouestion had been raised as
l'hether
letters
should be sent to Comptroller Delano and Chairman
4rle"ing f°r their
views with respect to authorization oC the branch.
Mr'
SzYmczak referred
to the letter from Comptroller Delano
'111Q11 41clico.ted that
the application of Bank of America for branches
Gerl'ir4. sh°1'ld not be
approved because their establishment might be
tlIN1i8terit
With the
Proceeding Lnstituted by the Board against Trans`11
ti ?

aP,

CorDoration.
Clayton Act, and he went on to say that
under
the
et
1ters of
both the Comptroller of the Currency and
inquiry
to
t0

kr,s.rlt

belposit
t-

Insur'?-nee Corporation should be written with re-

aPplicatio-a for a branch in Bangkok, Siam, for the purpose
01,141,th
ether
those agencies had any objection to the establishbr
'
e rl°h on
ground s other than that the ouestion of monopoly




11/16/48
_3_
In the
course of an extended discussion of this point, during
lich Messrs.

gestecl

Townsend, Associate General Counsel, and Millard, Director

lpilrision of
Exazinations, entered the meeting, mr. Eccles sugthat
letters be prepared to Comptroller Delano and to Chairman

1141 °I the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation asking specific ques'
48 CO
the desirability of approving the proposed Siam branch
iDllettellse basis
of the
bank's capital structure, its loan and dividend poi'allci its
foreign branch operating record to date, that a conferetice
e ll*Einged With ;,ir. Delano for the purpose of ascertaining to
'
/the,t e 4,
x4eht his
office will assist in developing the facts in the profile

ag8111st Tr
ansamerica Corporation, that a letter be written to

fiO4. el'al Reserve
Bank of San Francisco asking whether the recoramenda141 its
i h
letter of
blke
September 302 19a, for approval of the Siam
tlz,rdial.1()111c1 be
changed by developments since that time, that the
Rtesearch D
ivision be requested to prepare a memorandum with
48Peet
DoElm brztt
° ec°11°11lic and other prospects in the area in which the proCh
l'Iould
tqtted p
operate, and that all of this information be sub.Lor
Consideration
at a future meeting of the Board.
Upon,
motion by Mr. Szymczak, Mr. Ec"'est suggestion was approved unanimously.

Ref
cikt

ci
erence was then made to the letter received from the Presi-

NeQt t
liNtt
se

4t. t()

194i,

'ate Of November 6, 1948, asking for the Board's views with
1116terit'l for the
State of the Union message, the Economic
the
...egislative program, and to the outline of questions

4ber
e

IS

of the Board with a memorandum dated November 10,

celltlection, Mr. Eccles asked mr. Thomas to report on




11/1648
-4-

the

leeting which he attended yesterday afternoon, November 15, at the
l'ilreala of
the Budget
concerning the legislative program.
Mr. Thomas
stated that the discussion at the Bureau of the Buddealt principally with details of legislation that might

ue

Proposed and
not with policy questions, that when the question of
credit controls
sraised he stated that the Board had not reached a
deeision as
to Spec
ificlegislation that would be recommended but that
411
lotig run
matter the System needed additional controls if it was
the
J°11 aPparently
expected of it, and that it probably would be
lieeessarY to
do som
ext spring toward extending the temporary
E'41,04cy
provisions
ethingn
passed at the special session of Congress in AuWits
respect to

'ePort,

bank reserves and consumer credit controls.

C41-1-111an McCabe
entered the meeting at the close of Mr. Thomas'

There f
ArA
°110wed a brief discussion of material that should be
-PaN in
l'esPonse to the
President's letter but no conclusions were
alld,
because of the lateness of the hour, it was agreed that
:
111 7
11:
i rtItIOrl Of
the matter would be continued at a meeting at 10:30
cirlesc141 ni°/•riing,
November 17, 1948'
At
'41‘
this
point Messrs.
Riefler, Vest, Thomas, MillPrd, Leonard,
ND
:
.11cillic31411send
withdrew from
the action stated with
hereinafterand
the meeting
et to
tot,z,cit
each of
the matters
referred to was taken by the

b

qeeerior

es of
actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Fed-

-on




November 15, 1943, were approved unanimously.

-5Letter to Mr.
Sheehan, Chief Examiner of the Federal Reserve

Ilk of New
York, readi
ng as follows:

1948 "Reference is made to your letter of November 5,
138., submitting the
recuest of The Marine Trust Com4.2f Buffalo,
Buffalo,
New York, for permission to
aulish a
branch in the Town of Tonawanda, New York.
allthorities
"It is noted that approval of the appropriate State
zenci
has been obtained and in view of your recomh
zeritati°r1, the Board
of Governors approves the establis
yand oPeration of a
branch in the Town of Tonawanda,
falo c'm
rk P bY The Marine Trust Company of Buffalo, Bufwith' "aw York,
provided such branch is established
4.°118 Year of the date of this letter. It is
s'Agod that
counsel for the Reserve Bank has retalter,
ed4ancl is satisfied as to the legality of all steps
the '4z) establish
the branch which are complete with
(3reg°ing approval of the Board."
Approved unanimously.

of

Letter to Mr.
Diercks, Vice President of the Federal Reserve

Chicago, reading
as follows:
1948 "11,eference
is made to your letter of Novembed
rs8,
that
''rora
which the Board of Governors understan
tl
1:111riP11 exPect
to examine jointly or independently
,eral. L:
IMS all State
Fed
amember banks in the Seventhdy
y13,--erve District,
Harris
Trust
except
the
an
requesc, Chioa--,
Go Illinois, and notes that you
t, at
utitPilertotssion. to forego an examination of n
hi
alter January
1, 1949.
tAll4t ex112
1 1aw of the information submitted,
Savingsan
it appears
Atrtrip,—.41,
-Lnation of the
Harris Trust and
lloaa,,i° 4-948
would be impracticable. Therefore, the
t
not
:4 rent
require
the
examined
during
that
be
it
----kend
ihar
year
but
it
that
the
is
assumed
n
°11 will be
exalTlined early in the year 1949.
Approved unanimously.

tett
0

Mr,

411at or Me




Davis, Assistant Vice President of the Federal

York, reading as follows:

11/16/48
—0—

c
"This refers to
your letter of November 4 regarding
6jertain tr
ansactions at Bergen Trust Company, Jersey City,
IC jerseY, Which appear to have been violations of
egqation us
lir D It is understood that in a letter dated July 7, 1948,
ti, i 4 eter T
kixehati,_ • Byrne, Regional Administrator, Securities and
leli,ce u
ommission, informed you that the records of the
ti 4.3rit Stock
Exchange in connection witn an investigac
:
of the
activities of a member firm disclosed that a
zerabstclerable volizne of
security purchases effected by a
nan,
e,
r firm for
certain customers appear to have been
which
fiiild
;e bY Bergen
'
Trust
Company under circumstances
-keatted
.1.
Possible violations of Regulation U.
Ineniberl_
▪ aeriluch as Bergen
Trust Company is an insured nontxamm
• "
talc) You referred the matter to the Supervising
f
appro—ell
, of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation or
NovezTlr"tate investigation. You received a letter dated
ttg Ex„
eTh
,
r 1$ 1948, from Mr. Neil G. Greens/des, Supervisvisin -"4-rier,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, adt1
l rn
g,Tht11,
18t an investigation has revealed that a substanualrin
'
el' of
ny
tioa II 1946 andloans were made by Bergen Trust Company
1947 in an apparent disregard of RegulaPre , ) that the
loans had been handled personally by
J148''c9
lent Dwy
e,,er of Bergen Trust Company who died on,19
4°) that the present management of Bergen Trust
"estigit+7" fully
cooperative in the conduct of the inl'ith Re vic'n and
has indicated an intention to comply
ai.t the rat,U,
that no loans presently outstanding
an
'4•011 of 2st Company
appear to have been made in violacpIt the i,71,e'
l egulation, and that in future examinations
'
(*Porat—
is6itution by the Federal Deposit Insurance
claia?,
°11 ?xaminers careful note will be made as to
-ce
nu,,, 141th the
provisions of Regulation U. ‘
e 07er date
Of November 31 1948, you advised ,Ir.
lort
the cir
cumstances disclosed by the investigar°Nard
eAsia
,,,
ed to him a copy of the letter
requested him to advise you promptly
fom
opt
'
llr.of
'`°lEttio
,
-'
4 11 the future which appear to involve possible
y
b
11.,
111/1°f
RegUlatiOn U.
t
ti.4e•ti./. t '''Ae absence

of further developments there would
al,
° be not
nk
hingfurther
for the Board or your
,...7 t1/3)01,-(311t the
matter at the present time, but it will
'•'eirl-aleiated if
ou will keep in touch with the Super'tio-n;
xi
arnt1,
1-11ers ofYthe
Federal Deposit Insurance CorplIsSecl-toatiview to
e assuring that special attention
the question of compliance with Regulation
rtltllre
exkminations of the Trust Company."




Approved unanimously.

13/4
11/16/48
-7Letter to Mr.
Les Kelley, Publisher, Kelley Blue Book, 1221
S°11th

Figueroa Street,
Los Angeles 15) California, reading as follows:

1.9.a "This is in reply to your letter dated October
p
Book' requesting that the Board designate the Kelley Blue
for the purposes
of Regulation W in the states of
to-:Tla, Colorado,
Wyoming, and New Mexico, in addition
present designation for Region C.
that In support of your request you take the,
position
Bstl
.„Iverage retail used
car prices in these lour Region
c are aPproximately the same as those in the egio a"8
area, and that the present requirement that the
used
for-i Prices
quoted in Region B appraisal guides be h-trd_
shi eg
w
purposs
purposes in these states occasions
liMiting the maximum credit value to less than
LIL,rds of
the true market prices.
inte
are correct
in yo
your belief that it is not the
44hic4 Regulation W to curtail business or occasion
fleet :P by the use
of appraisal guides which do not re11e
market
d
prices.
On the contrary, we are very
l
a
take nterested in seeing
that the designated guides o
Prevatir,easonably successful effort to estimate the
thet th ig market
prices in the areas they cover, and
1
corisist'r estimating
are
not
i
npolicies
and
methods
"lent with
this objective.
:
Nice
1 will
understand, however, that we would be
,
Po.
rices z
eci
A411°t
, only if designated guides harmfully quoted
--erlally below the market, but also if they
the a Prices
above the market. In the latter event
:111
3
,T
3
8,
11rovision of the regulation would
retl
a i,,s'eu and
guideP
theguide quoting such high prices, if
kqti-ed its
4.ire"ad
designatio ) might gain an unfair comvantage over other guide books.
4t
tle tooks
"It
:
enis to us that the designation of the Kelley
the states of Montana, Colorado, Wyoming,
as well as for Region C, would be incon14
the P
of Regulation WI in that it
tlales1Z0-17:
Z in the designation of retail
Zivientualres
thoa West cor_e market in these states. It appears
ta4,,e
average
normally are higher than
,,,,,ketni+.4ese
ur states. Even though in an abnormal
formal
i'4'ttel-irtc,ion there may be instances in which prices
dtt.'eee st °Est may be comparable with certain prices
tikture.%?111ates) there is no assurance that such a cone°1atinue very long or even for the near




11/1648
-8"In
general, it does not appear practicable market
to adapt
,
e aPPraisal
guide
more
precise
designations
to
T
ti
als unless this is done through designation of
4e
ti414bodks
he
specifically designed for smaller areas than
Present three
Regions. If the present designations
ate srtended
to cover greater areas than these three Re89 as you request
for your guide, there would be a
s
Vrather
than a gain in the precision with which the
Teraisal e
th... broaderstimates applied in individual market areas.
the area covered, the less accurately will
il:testiiiiated prices reflect
not only the differentials
Sup
I:iazsportation charges but also all of the many local
frora
P'Y arid demand
change
factors which cause prices to compared
e
e to time in one market or trading area
t
%lith j
th
in another area.
.ror these
reasons the Board has decided against
Blue g Your
request for the extension of the Kelley
Sitlee (1°1c d
esignation to cover the four additional, states.
ePPreAth
nie Board is interested in having the de.siznted
'
faluPs Es close to the market as possible, howdecision should not be considered as standeclitiV,he
Y of the designation of any future special
1)1Y to
()-4°1 aPpraisal ,
uides particularly designed to ape
P4resent7
f.re four states or to other subdivisions of the
ated ;iree Regions. Before such editions were desIlaturell'°r the
purposes of Regulation W, the Board
arid
Would need
to have assurances that the methods
a°4Ekb eies used Were designed so as to provide reae°er
\r ed.n
'ecurate value estimates for the specific region

;eren

L:




Approved unanimous

Secretary.