View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
N[eral Reserve System on Thursday, November 1, 1951.

The Board met

in the Board Room at 10:30 a.m.
Chairnien
Mr. Sz:;.Tmczr.k..
horton
Lr. rowell
Mr. Carpenter, Secretary.
Mr. Vest, General Counsel
Mr. Allen, Director, Division of
Personnel Administration
The Secretary stated that in accordance with the action tPAen
1)7 the

Board on July ly, 1951, a Eroup life insurance contract had been

Ileeotlated wIth the Connecticut General Life Insurance Company covering
the „
`411Ployees of the federal Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors)
411(i that
the draft of contract was sent to the l'ederal Reserve Banks
the
no At s letter of October 16, 19')1. e also said that the Insurance
N'exttient
, xeouted
of the State of Illinois, where the application would be e
ct4141'le contract delivered, had su3rTsted certain minor chanes in the corltlet Ilhich had been incorporated, that Mr. Youn6, President of the federal
tie erve
13,01k of Chicaco, had advised that he had received from the .:!ederal
11%,11,.
U1ks and the Board of Trustees of the Retirement System authorizat1
°'1 or the execution of the application on their respective behalfs, and
1414 if the Board of
Governors was prepared to authorize the Bank to execute
t11. 4
Dlication on behalf of the Board, Mr. You

would sien the aunlication

l'c4' the T)°licY in ChicaEo today with the understandin6 that the contract




111V51
140104 become effective as of 12:01 a.m. on November 1.
Mr. Szymczak stated that he and Mr. Norton had participated in
the negotiation of the contract and had reviewed the changes proposed by
the Insurance Department of Illinois and recommended to the Board that
the a/tended contract be approved.

He added that the proposed contract

he.dbeen cleared with the Salary Stabilization and Wage Stabilization
4ards.

Mr. Szymczak pointed out that the maximum amount of insurance

14i()/id-ed by the contract for any one employee would be limited to $20,000
411c1 that) while under'the law the Connecticut General Life Insurance Corncould not guarantee the amount of the net premium cost of the contract,
the c
cmpetitive bid submitted by the Company was based on the present diviormula which would not be changed without a compelling reason.
It was also stated that the bid of the Connecticut General was the
1°'"rest s
ubmitted by any of the insurance companies invited to bid and that

the
0

0111Illon
•
had been expressed by the firm of Towers, Perrin, Forster and
of Philadelphia, who had served as consultants in the negotiation

f tale
contract, that as a practical matter any reputable company would

be
loath to deviate from the net premium estimates which had been subkittecia

Upon motion by Mr. Norton the proposed
contract was approved and unanimous approval
was given to the following telegram to Mr.
Young, President of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Chicago:




1)-7,1

95!.4

-3-

11/1/51

"With reference to the Board's letter of October 26,
1951, relating to the proposed contract for group life
insurance for Federal Reserve System employees, your Bank
is hereby authorized to execute the application for such
group life insurance on behalf of the Board of Governors."
In connection with the above matter
unanimous approval was also given to an increase in the appropriate classification of
the Board's budget for 1951 by an amount
equal to the first annual premium covering
employees of the Board under the group insurance policy.
IA this point all of the members of the staff with the exception
14.1% Carpenter withdrew, and the action stated with respect to each of
th° Matters hereinafter referred to was taken by the Board:
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Ileserve
System on October 31, 1951, were approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated October 30, 1951, from Mr. Williams, Assistant

ir'eete.r, Division of Research and Statistics, recommending that the
l'e8igliation of Donald Fort, Economist in that Division, be accepted to
be
.ective, in accordance with his request, at the close of business
(3";°13er 31, 1051.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated October 30, 1951, from Mr. V4i1liams, Assistant
bite
,
et°r, Division of Research and Statistics, recommending that
theiOfl
of Alfred H. Conrad, Economist in that Division, be accepted

t°13 "fective, in accordance with his request, at the close of business




471"

-4-

11/1/51
October 28, 1951.

Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated October 29, 1951, from Mr. Powell, recommending
44 increase in the basic salary of Miss Helen B. 'Wolcott, Secretary
to Mr. Powell, from $5,200 to

5,500 per annum, effective November 11,

1951.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated October 29, 1951, from Mr. Williams, Assistant
1)4ector, Division of Research and Statistics, recommending an increase
illthe basic
salary of Mrs. Elizabeth B. Sette, Economist in that Divisic)
4) from '5,685 to $5,810 per annum, effective November 11, 1951.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated October 30, 1951, from Mr. Bethea, Director,
D1'11810/1 of Administrative Services, recommending an increase in the
bEtG 4
salary of Arthur S. Myers, Operating Engineer in that Division,

(4. ,
Y3,035 to $3,735

per annum, effective November 11, 1951.
Approved unanimously.

Memorandum dated October 30, 1951, from Mr. Marget, Director,
1 is

"of International Finance, recommending an increase in the
1)4 .0
salary of Miss Eleanor M. Ballinger, Research Assistant in that
from $3,190 to $3,410 per annum, effective November 11, 1951.




Approved unanimously.

11/1/51
Letter to Mr. Milton Rosen, Commissioner of Public l'orks,
Department of Public Works, St. Paul, Minnesota, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of October 17, 1951
concerning the application of Regulation 1,4 to garbage
incinerators. In this connection, you indicate that
individually owned domestic incinerators offer a solution to the garbage and trash disposal problem that has
arisen in the City of St. Paul because of the growing
inadequacy in the number of farmers collecting garbage
Under the present licensing system. You point out In
addition that while a number of such incinerators are
being installed in compliance with the prevailing terms
Of the regulation, a much greater number must be installed
lf an adequate system of garbage disposal is to be maintained.
"By an interpretation published at page 1310 of the
1950 Federal Reserve Bulletin, and at page 6630 of 15
Federal Register, October 3, 1950, the Board took the
Position that garbage incinerators were covered by the
regulation as residential repairs, alterations, or imProvements and, therefore, were subject to the applicable down payment or maximum loan value, monthly payment
arid maximum maturity provisions of the regulation. The
Present required down payment is 10 per cent (maximum
loan value 90 per cent), and the maximum maturity is 36
months. However, you referred to section 7(m) of the
regulation as possibly affording an exemption in the
circumstance described in your letter.
"As you indicated, the exemption contained in sectio
n ((m) applies, in certain limited cases, to the
.1.118ta11ation of sewerage and necessary related facilities
_ilicluding plumbing and plumbing fixtures). However, by
the specific language of that section, it does not apply
1,11.1ess the particular installation is 'required in order
comply with a statute, ordinance, or regulation of
to
United States, a State or political subdivision
, lereof t. The 1949 ordinance referred to in your letter
?Pears merely to specify the intervals for garbage colAection. If, in a given case, the ordinance constituted
'i. requirement, there would remain the question whether
4e particular installation so required otherwise satisfied
"ction 7(0.




9,c4

11/1/51

-6-

"In specifying the terms applicable to home
modernization and repair, an important consideration
Was the necessitous nature of some such work. The low
down payment of ten per cent, together with the extended maturity of 36 months, reflect an effort by the
Board to acuommedate such cases in a manner consistent
with the purposes of the regulation and statute. In
other areas covered by the regulation, a substantially
higher down Payment is required, and the maximum maturity
is only half as long.
"The Board is not unmindful of the difficulties that
appear to have arisen in your city, and the matter has
received its sympathetic consideration. However, on the
"basis of the facts and circumstances as presented in your
letter, it does not appear that the present reulation
affords an applicable exemption of the kind suggested.
however, if there are other or additional aspects of this
matter which you desire to call to our attention, we will
be glad to reconsider the matter in that light."
Approved unanimously, with a
copy to Mr. Strothman, Vice President
of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
Letter to Mr. William H. Fletcher, First Vice President of the
?ecier
al Reserve
Bank of Cleveland, reading as follows:'
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of October
22 1
/ 951, regarding the case of Best Radio Shop, Cleve-` 11(1, Ohio, which was referred to the Board because of
a-aeged violations of Regulation W.
You state that, pursuant to a request by Mr. Towns
i encl, your Bank endeavored to obtain customer statements
connection with the alleged violations, but that your
irlvestigators did not obtain any evidence of willful viov tions although they attempted interviews in connection
reth almost half of the transactions of which you have a
zae
,
c)rd. Moreover, a reinvestigation which was recently
to'! of this registrant's place of business with respect
o - ransactions subsequent to your disciplinary conference
0 disclosed no violations of the regulation. In the




nA/51

-7-

"circumstances you recommend that no proceedings against
this registrant be instituted at this time.
"The Board agrees with your recommendation."
Approved unanimously.
Notice for publication in the federal Register, prepared in
Eteckprdance with the action of the Board on October 30, 19)1, reading as
folaows:
"Regulation W - Consumer Credit - issued by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to section
601 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, regulates instalment credit, including such credit in connection
with the purchase of certain articles listed in Part 1 of secOn 9 (the Supplement to the regulation). Among these articles
are 'utomobiles' as listed in Item I, Group A, Part 1 of such
section 9.
"The Board is considering whether or not it uould be
Practicable and otherwise az)oropriate to exclude from Item 1,
?r°uPA, Part 1 or section 9 (the Supplement to the regulaion) older model used automobiles.
"To aid in the consideration of this matter, the Board
14111 be glad to receive from interested persons any relevant
el(Planations, data, or other information. Any such material
Mould be submitted in writing to be received by the Board
not later than November 15, 1951."




Approved unanimously.