View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1738

A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
r13111,Jus held in Washington on Thursday, November 1, 1945, at 10:30

PRESENT: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Ransom, Vice Chairman
McKee
Draper
Evans

Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Connell, General Assistant,
Office of the Secretary
Mr. Morrill, Special Adviser
Mr. Thurston, Assistant to the Chairman
Mr. Leonard, Director of the Division
of Personnel Administration
Mr. Thomas, Director of the Division
of Research and Statistics
Mr. Vest, General Attorney
Mr. Wyatt, General Counsel
Mr. Ransom referred to the appearance of Mr. Snyder, Director
()t the np-p
of War Mobilization and Reconversion, before the subcom—
mittee or
the House Judiciary Committee on October 26, 1945, in connec—
ti"ith

proposed legislation which would extend for a further period

eertain
provisions of the Second War Powers' Act, and stated that he
(111'•

Ran om

) and Mr. Goldenweiser had testified briefly at the hearing

IlLne the
gl
'

reasons for the extension for at least one year of Title IV

or the A_,
under which the Reserve Banks have authority to purchase
(*li,gations directly
from the Treasury. Mr. Ransom also said that
0veral of
the members of the subcommittee had indicated a feeling
th„
,
the
4 Should
recommend permanent legislation instead of an exten—
siO4,

out
111313c)rt

since he did not know at the time whether the Treasury would

--rmanent legislation, he thought it advisable to point out




1739
11/1/45

—2-

to the subcommittee that it might not be possible to have permanent
legislation enacted before December 31, 1945, and that, therefore,
44 "tension at this time would be more desirable.
Following Mr. Snyder's testimony, he asked of Mr. Ransom that
the Board
furnish him with a memorandum of the reasons supporting the
l'squest that
Title IV of the Act be extended for another year so that
the
statement could be incorporated in the report which the subcom,ki-ttee had
requested Mr. Snyder to make. A draft of the letter pre—
1:18.1'eci kr Mr. Ransom in response to this request was presented during
the rileeting.

Chairm

Eccles said that Mr. Snyder had asked for the

Iriews of the Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as to
the d
esirability of extending the exemption of war loan deposit
accolints
from reserve requirements and Federal Deposit Insurance Cor15c)ration a
ssessments as permitted under the Act of April 13, 1943, and
that
41r. Bell
had read to him over the telephone the letters written

13Y t

he Treasury to Mr. Snyder recommending that the exemption and the
tho
id'Y of the Federal Reserve Banks to purchase up to 5 billion
Or Go
irel'arnent securities from the Treasury, be continued until the end
°t 1946, T-11
connection with the matter of direct purchases from the
Trea
-8147, Mr.
Eccles said that the Treasury would like that provision
°r the law to be made permanent and the $5 billion limitation removed,
1311t 0
aiorif r the present considered it advisable to ask only for an exten0f one
year.




1740
11/IA5

-3Mr. Goldenweiser entered the meeting at this point.
During the discussion which followed, it was suggested that

the Board send letters to Mr. Snyder recommending the extension of
Title ...V
T
of the Second War Powers' Act and the exemption of war loan
cielp081t accounts from reserve requirements.
Upon motion by Mr. McKee, it was
voted unanimously to authorize Chairman
Eccles to send two letters to Mr. Snyder
setting forth the reasons for the extension of the two provisions of law until
the end of 1946.
The letters sent by Chairman Eccles
in accordance with this action were as follows:
Letter Regarding Extension of Title IV
"I have been advised by Mr. Ransom of the suggestion
r,7,4-?h You made after your testimony before the Subcommittee
the House Judiciary Committee that we send you a memoof the reasons supporting the request that Title IV
°f the Second
War Powers Act be extended for at least a
Year.
While we may at some later date ask that this authorwhich was sponsored by the Board of Governors and is
%ministered by the Federal Open Market Committee, be placed
to 4 Permanent basis, it may not be appropriate at this time
ke Take such a request. The authority should, however, be
1,
0 13 in force at least during the coming year. I am advised
an Bell that the Treasury has recommended its extension
,,Period of one year.
sell Since Mr. Ransom is preparing to go out of town, I am
an ding You herewith a brief memorandum of reasons for such
ex
tension."
LatlIfijitgarding Exemption of War Loan De osits
por, "In another letter I am writing you regarding the proextension of Title IV of the Second War Powers Act. I
IZerstand from Ronald Ransom's report regarding the hearing
a °re the Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee that
mrstion was raised regarding other war-time legislation
'might be expiring, and therefore I am writing you regardhe Act of April 13
) 1943.




1741
11/1/45

-4-

"This Act provided that deposits in member banks payable to the United States and arising solely as the result
of
subscriptions for United States Government securities
commonly known as war-loan deposits) shaJ1 not be included
J-n deposits against which reserve balances must be maintained
by member
banks with Federal Reserve Banks. The same Act
also provided in effect that such war-loan deposits in banks
Whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation should not be subject to the ordinary assessments against deposits. These exempting provisions, however, will expire six months after the cessation of hostilities as determined by proclamation of the President or conCurrent
understand that the
Fp' corpresolution of the Congress. I
oration has advised you of its wishes regarding the
ecmtinuance of the exemption as to insurance assessments.
"We feel that the exemption of war-loan deposits from
reserve requirements should be continued until the end of
1946, and Dan Bell has informed me that the Treasury de_
sires such an extension. If this exemption should be ter-inated suddenly while Treasury balances continue to be
large, the
imposition of reserve requirements upon them
Would
4
cause considerable disturbance to member banks of
'
ci"e Federal Reserve System and would likely result in the
:Ping on the market of substantial amounts of Government
ti curitiss in order to enable member banks to meet the additonal
reserve requirements necessitated by their war-loan
Consequently, the Board of Governors feels that
itP"its.
sndwould be desirable to allow a definite period, until the
of 1946, within which Treasury balances may return to
Ore
nearly normal proportions, so that member banks will
4.7 In better position to meet the reserve requirements upon
n
Prior to this meeting there had been circulated among the

bera

men—

°f the
Board a letter dated October 15, 1945, from Mr. Prochnow,
ting
oecretary
of the Federal Advisory Council, requesting a list of
topics
:hich the Board wished the Council to discuss at its next meet.,

ilovember 3.8-19, 1945It was agreed unanimously that the
Secretary should send a telegram to Mr.




1742

11/1/45

-5Prochnow suggesting the following topic for
consideration by the Council:

"There is increasing discussion of the cost of Government debt with special reference to the part of the debt
held by banks. What is your opinion as to how best to meet
the issues
that may be raised?"
Reference was then made to a memorandum dated October 19, 1945,
fr°111Mr. Leonard, Director of the Division of Personnel Administration,
to which was attached a letter from Mr. Williams, President of the FedealReserve Bank of Philadelphia, addressed to Mr. Szymczak, under date

or
October 18, 1945, in which it was stated that the Bank proposed to
44tiate rather
promptly a thoroughgoing study of job classifications
arid
salarY rates at the Bank and for that purpose to employ, in a con-

121-tarit capacity,
Mr. C. Canby Balderston, who had prepared the report
°II

executive development in the Federal Reserve Banks and who was now

4 ClaSs 0

director of the Philadelphia Bank.

The memorandum (which

discussed
the questions raised by the proposal) and letter had been circulated to the
members of the Board before this meeting.
Mr. Draper questioned the propriety of a director of a Federal
Bank being employed on a retainer basis for any purpose.
Mr. Leonard stated that Mr. Svmczak, who was unable to be
131'eaent at this
meeting because of an engagement in New York City, had
4zIted .
nIm to say to
the Board that, although he considered it inappro141ate for a
director of a Reserve Bank to accept such an assignment,
he
l'ecognized Mr. Balderston's particular qualifications as




a possible

1743
11/1/45

-6-

haBie for an exception in this case, but that if it were the decision

edb the

majori,
uy of the Board that such an arrangement should not be

'
lade he
would concur in that view.
In the discussion which ensued, all of the members present
cillesti°ned the propriety of the proposed arrangement with Mr. Balderston
and Concurred
in the suggestion that Mr. Williams be advised that the
revie
of the personnel classification plans of the Reserve Banks
inir°11recl problems that should be considered on a System basis and
that the Board would take up with the Banks promptly the question of
the
Pr
ocedure to be followed.
In accordance with this decision, Mr.
Leonard was requested to prepare a draft
of letter to President Williams for con—
sideration by the Board and to make a rec—
ommendation as to the procedure to be fol—
lowed by the Reserve Banks and the Board
in reviewing the existing classification
plans and developing plans which would be
In the direction of greater uniformity at
all Federal Reserve Banks.
At this point Mr. Leonard left the room, and Messrs. Robinson

a4d

ard, Economists
in the Division of Research and Statistics,

Joil ,
leq the

meeting

There was then presented a memorandum dated October 22,
1945,

trora
reacitt

• Thomas,
Director of the Division of Research and Statistics,

e a8

follows:

tiar "On March 21, 1944 the Board authorized an expendi—
e of between 5,000 and $15,000 for an exploratory




1_744
11/1/45

-7-

tI

survey of individual ownership of currency, deposits, war
bonds and other liquid funds to be undertaken by the Division of Program Surveys of the Department of Agriculture.
At that time
it was decided 'that when the results of the
exPloratory surveys were available the Board would consider
the matter
further and determine whether it should authorize Payment of costs necessary to complete the surveys on
a nationwide
basis.' The results of this preliminary survey
Were transmit
ted to the Board about two months ago and an
rticie
summarizing then was published in the Federal Re—
Serve
Bulletin for September 1945.
"Notwithstanding the limited scope of the exploratory
.11
4.r1reiY, the results obtained have been in great demand;
is
generally agreed among experts in the field that the
methods employed provided dependable results. In view of
the great
importance of the subject at this time, there is
',Ted for a broader survey. Accordingly, it is recommended
1, ,t the
Board authorize a further survey along the lines
vutlined below at a cost not to exceed $60,000.
ers "During the present transition period between a war
:
°n0MY and normal peacetime operations, information re:
rding assets is of special importance, as the possibilities
for inflation are now more real and imminent than
m"eY have been
heretofore. Other agencies of the Govern-71t$ Particularly the Bureau of the Census and the Bureau
r
or
cs, are planning to seek appropriations
om con._Statisti
gress for nationwide surveys of income and consumer
7,enditures
, but none of these projects can be expected
:
ri ep forward for at least a year.
In this interval, the
„21 for better data as to the holders of liquid assets
•-.411ta
tic,,“zax attitudes towards the assets they hold is par—
on e'Zit:
..rE
ilitcal... The Interdepartmental Subcommittee
Expenditures and Savings, which reports to
the Do—_,
vea -Ltuget Bureau, has officially recognized the positive
re,,us of the survey already sponsored by the Board and has
f,'Izmended that it be extended. We have also had a request
the staff of
the O. W. M. R. that we obtain additional
-"I rmation
on this subject.
locatiWhile the survey gave disappointing results as to
fact °11 of currency in circulation, indicating that satis"
tain
information on this aspect can probably not be obit did yield useful information as to holdings of
attiy, assets and unexpectedly significant data on people's
pron'ludes toward the use of their liquid assets. A large
4411ti°n, for example, indicate an intention to hold

t




1745
11/1/45

-8-

"their assets as security against future economic or personal difficulties, even if this involves purchasing consumer durable goods on the instalment plan. Further care1111 questioning along these lines could probably obtain
8°me quantitative information on the extent to which people
intend to draw upon their liquid assets in order to make
various types of expenditures during the next year, which
1OU1d In turn shed light on
a major potential source of
By emphasizing questions where results were
foound to be fruitful and
eliminating questions found to
n.7 less important, I feel that the proposed survey could
give 118 not
only more accurate national estimates of liquid
asset ownership but also improved
and extended information
n people's
intentions regarding such assets.
"It is agreed among the technicians that the survey
TIZ:di be extended to cover approximately 3,000 persons
in about 30 to 40 different urban, village and
1211r41 areas, spread over the whole country. The cost of
:overage at this level would be in the range of $50,000
tt') $60,000.
Actual interviewing would start not later
at2. next January and preliminary results could be expected early in March. The
results of this survey, tote'a r with the shape of economic developments, would deWhether there should be a recommendation for furdert:rveYs of this sort and whether they should be unen by the Reserve System or by some other agency
Of
Government."
0 4e k•obe

During the discussion, reference was made to a letter dated

biliza
:
i23, 1945, from Mr. Snyder, Director of the Office of War Molined .

on and
Reconversion, urging that the expanded survey as out-

ln *. Thomas memorandum be made.
It was
pointed out that when this matter was discussed by the
°41'cl on Mar
th 21, 1944, an expenditure of between $5,000
and $15,000

authoriz
ed for the pilot or exploratory surveys,
upon the under4t4Ilding that
when the results of the preliminary surveys were avail4ble, the
Board would consider the matter further and determine
whether




1746
11/1/45
it

-9-

should authorize the payment of the costs necessary to pursue the

8111.1reys

on a nation-wide basis.
Upon motion by Mr. Evans, it was voted
unanimously to authorize Mr. Thomas to work
out the necessary details for the proposed
survey with the Department of Agriculture
With the understanding that when the plans
were completed they would be submitted to
the Board for final approval.
At this point
Messrs. Thomas, Vest, Wyatt, Goldenweiser,

Robi
nscm. and Villard withdrew from the meeting.
after

The actions stated
with respect to each of the matters hereinreferred to
was then taken by the Board:
The minutes of
the meeting of the Board of Governors of the

Peciet'al Reserve
System held on October 31, 1945/ were approved unani111°1181,Y.
Memorandum dated
October 26, 1945, from Mr. Bethea, Director
°I' the n4
--Lvision of
Administrative Services, submitting the resignation
"°11ald A.
Hurst (who was ordered to report for duty in the Armed
814"41eee on
October 25, 1945) as a clerk in that Division, and recomniellcliAg that
the resignation be accepted effective as of the close of
C)et(lber 24
'1945, and that payment be made to Mr. Hurst of one month's
salarY (one-twelfth of his annual salary) in accordance with
-Le 11°11cY
adopted by the Board on June 16, 1943, with respect to the
1)111tellt °I' military benefits to temporary
indefinite employees who
ellter

tullitarY service.




Approved unanimously.

1747
11/1/45

—10—
Memorandum dated October 29, 1945, from Mr. Paulger, Director

°f the Division of
Examinations, recommending that Louis t. Zidek, who
hasbeen on military leave, be reinstated in his position as Assistant
ectel'al Reserve
Examiner in that Division, with salary at the rate of
42
'
98o Per annum, effective as of the date upon which he enters upon
the Per
formance of his duties after having passed the usual physical
exam
lnation.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated October 31,
1945, from Mr. Bethea, Director
t)f the n
'Avision of Adn,jnistratjve Services, recommending that Mrs.
48ePhirie Boswell be
appointed as a charwoman in that Division on a
teith,
"
rarY basis for a
period of not to exceed two months, with salary
at the rate
of $1,440 per annum, effective as of the date upon which
6he
enters upon
the performance of her duties after having passed the
Pkrsical examination.

The memorandum stated that it was not

contemplated that Mrs. Boswell would become a
member of the Board's
Isetitternent system.
Approved unanimously.
1/6411t or

Letter to Mr. Evans, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
Dallas, reading as follows:

yo_ "In accordance
with the recommendation contained in
'letter of October 25, 1945 the Board of Governors
Avl'.4
de to
et stateJanuary 15, 1946, the time within which the
Bank of Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas,
tr- accomplish
membership."

:1!




Approved unanimously.

1748
11/1/45

-11Letter to the Presidents of 831 the Federal Reserve Banks read-

ing as
follows:
"At the joint meeting on October 18, 1945, of the
Presidents' Conference with the Board of Governors, as
YOU will recall, some questions arose regarding the present margin
rules in Regulations T and U, and the Board
!
...geed at that time to send to all the Presidents a claritYlng statement concerning these rules. Such a statement
18 enclosed."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. L. M. Sales, Sales Furniture Company, Louisville,
ICentucky,
reading as follows:
19, Me very much appreciate your letter of October 18,
45, giving your thoughts about the future of consumer
credit regulation.
"A number of people feel, like you, that the Government should have power to regulate consumer credit, as a
14,rmanent part of a program to promote economic stability.
thhers
'as you know, take a different view, frequently on
i_e general
ground that economic controls are likely to
'
"
1 1!'erfere with the attainment of full production under a
Private enterprise system.
"The Board has taken no position on the question of
Permanent authority. Its present authority continues during
ma th
-s national emergency declared by the President on
, 1941. This emergency period has no specific tendate but will end upon a declaration by the Presim4!6. Congress, of course, can take action either to terthe authority or to adopt permanent legislation.
'In
order to carry out the purposes which Regulation
N wa,
signed
to accomplish, the Board is of the opinion
the;
de
- the
regulation, modified from time to time as required
4changing
conditions, should remain in effect until the
g0 '0f inflation has diminished, that is, until consumers'
come on the market in sufficient supply to meet deView of the low production during the war of
m0
,
!
4 for which credit is used, this time should be some
-'118 in the future."

r

4




Approved unanimously.

sv 2uTpuaa gssaa2uo0 Jo uuTavaqTri gSUVAH Ifl'



o1..1941a1

us4

nompreun paAoadav
8T1.11.J
2uTuuT29
so ,u
awl oq aoTad 2uTpTTnq agq Jo uoTqTTomap agq
oq uoTqoacqo ou svg pavoga
Tan
11I
66 qv 2UTpItt4
amq aquouA oq squeuaq oq uaAT2 U09(1
SpvaaTu
axeq
sa01
,0
aouTs '5176T 'ez aaqopo Jo aaqqaT anoS oq 2uTaaaJauu '
** 11
:smoTToJ su

Nuug

2uTpvaa cuolsoa
So

aAaasau Tvaapaa am_ Jo uumarego g uoqq2Ta10 *an oq ja4lal

•STsTIOTUTuuUn p9A0JddV
ti.Ze UOTI.3Gs
Jo 2uTuvawm.
uTgqTm ssauTsnq
a
soT4Tan
oes
agq
UT
1)92E2
—Ua STTavm-Tad sT uoTquaodao0 atiq aaqqagm uoTqsanb 91
/1 To
uoTquaapTsuoo aaqqanJ Saussaoau aNvw TIThi
3looqs s41
JO
2uTaaJJo aanqnJ Suv quqq u0Tquaoda00 911'4.o. aua13
pTnogs qT qnq ze uoTqoas Jo maTAand agq uT144Ta uorIpaodap5
egg_ 2uTaq pInom aAoqu paquqs
se
uoTquao
dao0
1.uaultvlsalt
;
0
qaaaqs aquqg Jo uoTqov papuaquT atiq qvgq aapTsuoo 4ou
I

oe

paqTwTT

pavog
O.
*GAP
act -Mu 21.1T-IeJJ0 914 qmil.
fPuTpuuqsqno MOU SOJEW
aavoJetfl.4v44 fstsv
sTgq uo SOJULIS 0004en vioqv anssT TITm 4T
4v1
41.
fsimac
pi
Svc' -ETTA qT qunoure agq
—TATP uTe2 Tv4Tdvo su magq.
irmin
9JOM qou anTuA qassu qv qsaAuTaa oq sq1.12Ta aTcreaajsu

cugliezeT

Svp—oe saapTogaaugs sqT oq anssT tIqTaaaagq uoTqoauu03
puu puapTATp suTv2 TuqTdvo v saapTogaavgs sqT oq
—sip oq sagsTm uoTquaodao0
puvqsaapun osTv
TeM4
uT paqTaosap saTI.TAT40-e
qoy 2uppreg Jo

ç

uoTpos

9144 Jo Sue uT pa2v2ua MOU qT sT IOU 9TES JOJ 31004s svc
Jo Suv 2UTJOJJO JO 2UTTISST UT pa2v2ua mou qou qsnal. wacil
—qsaAuT pua—uado uu sT uoTquaodao0 quamqsaAui qaaaqs 9.1v4s
4'8144 puvqsaapun

se

04

6z

aagoloo aaqqaT anoS auu

:smoTToJ sv 2uTpuea 'uoqsog Jo Nuug

91,14

Jo Tasuno0 quvqsTssv. pus Savqaaoas 'a2aag

aAaasau

reaaNa

oq mva2aTa/

—T—

GIZT

—13—
"This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of Oc—
tober 23 in regard to excess stocks of printed and process
ed
?ports and other documents of which distribution has
hltherto been restricted for reasons of security.
.
wKe do not have any excess copies of such material for
distribut
ion. Accordingly, there appears to be no need for
the
designation of an officer in this organization for the
Poiurpose outlined in your letter. However, if you should
esire any further information, please communi
cate with us
again.n
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated October 30, 1945, from Mr. Paulger, Director
the Division of
inations, recommending that $100 be added to the
1945 bud
--get for that Division to cover postage and expressage.




Approved unanimously.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.