View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Friday, May 71 1954. The Board met in the
Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Szymczak
Evans

Vardaman
Mills
Robertson
Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Horbett, Assistant Director, Division of
Bank Operations
Mr. Solomon, Assistant General Counsel
Mr. Daniels, Chief, Reserve Bank Operations
Section, Division of Bank Operations

There were presented telegrams to the Federal- Reserve Banks of
New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis,
Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, and San Francisco stating that the
Board approves the establishment without change by the Federal Reserve
Bank of St. Louis on May 3, by the Federal Reserve Banks of

Richmond,

Kansas City, and San Francisco on May, and by the Federal Reserve Banks

or New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Atlanta, Chicago, Minneapolis, and
Dallas on May

6, 1954, of the rates of discount and purchase in their

existing schedules.
Approved unanimously.
There vas also presented a memorandum from Mr. Young, Director,
Division of Research and Statistics, dated May 51 19541 recommending that
in response to an invitation extended by Mr. Earhart, President of the




s'e

5/7/54

-2-

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, the Board authorize Mr. Louis
Weiner, Chief, National Income, Moneyflows, and Labor Section of the
Division of Research and Statistics, to attend and participate in a
Business Outlook Conference scheduled by that Bank to be held in San
Francisco on May 17, 1954.
Approved unanimously.
Before this meeting there had been circulated among the members
of the Board a draft of letter to Mr. Fulton, President, Federal Reserve
Bank of Cleveland, reading as follows:
The Board will interpose no objection to the expenditure of approximately $150,000 for the alterations
to the Cincinnati Branch building and in the space to be
leased in the adjoining Commerce Garage for the purpose
of providing a security court for the Branch, all in
accordance with the program approved by the Directors of
the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and as outlined in
your letter of April 9, 1954. This represents an increase
of $50,000 in the expenditure authorized in the Board's
letter of December 4, 1953.
The Board likewise will interpose no objection to the
execution of the contract with Hillsmith and Co. for the
necessary work, at a cost of approximately $134,397, as
recommended by the Directors. It is understood that, because of the status of one of the owners of the property,
approval of the court must be obtained before the lease
may be executed. It is also understood that the Bank's
action with respect to the contract will be dependent upon
obtaining the lease. In view of the uncertainty as to the
time of court action upon the lease, it is assumed that
appropriate steps will be taken to protect the Bank's interest in case there may be a decline in building costs before the lease is signed.
It is understood also that you expect to forward the
proposed lease to the Board for review before it is submitted to the court for approval.




Approved unanimously.

5/7/54

-3Governor Vardaman referred to the discussion at the meeting of

the Board on April 2, 1954, at which time he reported that Mr. Boothe,
Administrator, Office of Defense Loans, had suffered another heart attack.
He stated that Mr. Boothe's condition was such that he would not be able
to return to the office for some time and he raised the question whether
some adjustment should be made in compensation for Mr. Connell, Acting
Administrator for Defense Loans.
Chairman Martin suggested that in view of the uncertainty

re-

garding Mr. Boothe's return to the office, Mr. Connell should serve as
Acting Administrator for at least two months before consideration is
,given to any'adjustment in his compensation.
Governor Vardaman commented that by the end of that time there
probably would be more definite information regarding Mr. Boothe's return
to the office and also regarding the volume of defense loans, and that
the Board might then be in a better position to determine whether the
present arrangements for handling the work should be continued or whether
some change should be made.
The meeting then adjourned. During the day the following additional actions were taken by the Board with all of the members present:
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on

May 6, 1954, were approved unanimously.

Memorandum dated May 5, 1954, from Mr. Young, Director, Division
of Research and Statistics, recommending that the resignation of Marilyn
Rishell, Clerk-Typist in that Division, be accepted, effective May 13, 1954.




Approved unanimously.

5/7/54
Letter to Mr. Powell, President, Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis, reading as follows:
In accordance with the requests contained in your
letters of April 281 1954, the Board of Governors approves the appointments of Leander George Tonseger and
William James Kilroy as Examiners, and Robert F. Farrell,
Harold K. Swanson and Reynold Wilbur Anderson as Assistant Examiners for the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
It is noted that Mr. Swanson is indebted to the
First Robbinsdale State Bank, Robbinsdale, Minnesota,
and Mr. Anderson to the Richfield State Bank, Richfield,
Minnesota, both nonmember banks. It is assumed that
they will not be authorized to participate in any examinations of the banks to which they are indebted.
With reference to the mortgage indebtedness of Mr.
Tonsager to Ebenezer Home Society, Minneapolis, of Mr.
Anderson to Minnesota Federal Savings and Loan Association,
Minneapolis, and of Mr. Swanson to First Robbinsdale State
Bank, a nonmember bank, Robbinsdale, Minnesota, it will be
appreciated if you will furnish the essential details regarding such indebtedness as requested in the Board's
letter S-178 of August 25, 1939 (FRis #9181).
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Millard, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco, reading as follows:
Reference is made to your letter of April 27, 1954,
recommending an extension of twelve months be granted the
First State Bank of Salina, Selina, Utah, within which to
establish a branch at Panguitch, Utah. The establishment
of the branch was approved by the Board on May 27, 1953,
provided among other things, that it be established within
one year.
From the information submitted it appears that a
definite locationfbr the branch has not been selected, plans
for a building have not been prepared and a date for opening
of the branch is very uncertain. Under ordinary circumstances the Board would feel that the time originally granted




726
5/7/54

-5-

for the establishment of the branch was sufficient. However, it is realized that illness has intervened and the
Board extends to the end of the year 1954 the time within
which the branch may be established under the conditions
prescribed in its letter of May 27, 1953.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury Department,
Washington, D. C., (Attention:

Mr. G. W. Garwood, Deputy Ccmptroller

of the Currency) reading as follows:

Reference is made to a letter from your office dated
March 26, 1954, enclosing photostatic copies of an application to organize a national bank at Prescott, Arkansas,
and requesting a recommendation as to whether or not the
application should be approved.
Information contained in a report of investigation of
the application made by an examiner for the Federal Reserve
Bank of St. Louis indicates generally favorable findings
with respect to the factors usually considered in connection
with such proposals. Accordingly, the Board of Governors
recommends approval of the application.
The Board's Division of Examinations will be glad to
discuss any aspects of this case with representatives of
your office, if you so desire.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Presidents of all Federal Reserve Banks reading
as follows:
In referring to a Federal Reserve Bank for appropriate
reply a letter recently received from a national bank which
indicated that the Board had expressed the view that the expense of printing of names on checkbooks for customers must
be charged to the customers, the Board said:
"The Board has issued no interpretation to the
effect that an expense of this kind must be charged
to a bank's customers or that absorption of such expense is an indirect payment of interest in violation




727
5/7/54

-6of Regulation Q. On the contrary, in a letter
to the Federal Reserve Bank of
dated December 30, 1943, with respect to a case
in which the expense incurred by a national bank
in printing checkbooks averaged three or four
dollars with respect to each customer, the Board
stated:
"'The absorption of the expense of
specially printing check books for a
customer does not result in any payment
to the customer or credit to his account
which increases the amount of his deposit balance. * * * Moreover, under the
facts here stated, it is believed that
the absorption of the expense in question
cannot properly be considered as "compensation for the use of the funds constituting the deposit".
"Accordingly, it is the view of the
Board that the absorption by the First
National Bank of
of the expense of specially printing check books
for its customers in the circumstances
indicated in Mr.
's letter would
not involve a payment of interest on demand deposits in violation of the Board's
Regulation Q. It is possible, of course,
that there may be other cases in which
the absorption of an expense of this kind
would constitute a payment of interest because of the particular facts involved."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Leach, President, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond,

reading as follows:
In the interest of strengthening internal control, the
Board's public accountants, Arthur Andersen & Co., recommend
that payrolls be paid from an imprest payroll bank account.
Accordingly, effective May 12, 1954, the Board's next pay day,
you are authorized and requested to open an account on your
books to be known as "Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System - Payrol? Fund", and to transfer to that account
from the Board's existing General Fund account, such sums as




728
5/7/54

-7-

will be authorized from time to time by the medium of a
check drawn on the latter account.
These checks will
be drawn in the following manner:
Pay to the order of
"Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond for credit
to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System - Payroll Fund".
All checks drawn on the Payroll Fund account, will
be signed by those persons authorized in the Board's
letter of August 6, 1953, to sign and countersign checks
drawn on the General Fund account, specimens of whose
signatures you now have on file at the Bank.
Checks to be charged to the Payroll Fund account
established on your books will be the "primrose" color
now being used for payroll disbursements. In order to
establish a cutoff date it will be appreciated if you
will begin charging payroll checks to the Payroll Fund
account effective Wednesday morning May 12, 1954. On
receipt by us of your statement for Tuesday, May 11,
1954, we will determine the total amount of payroll
checks outstanding as of the close of business on that
day and immediately forward our draft to transfer this
amount from the General Fund account. All "blue-gray"
color checks now being used will continue to be charged
to the General Fund account.
Incidentally, about the first of the year 1955,
when our present supply of paper payroll checks is exhausted, it is contemplated that a card check for
salary payments will be adopted. This type of check
would be of a color that would further distinguish it
from checks drawn on the General Fund account as well as
make it possible to prepare statements mechanically
when volume warrants.
It is contemplated that separate daily statements of
the two accounts will be submitted to the Board. However,
if for any day there are no transactions in either of the
accounts there would, of course, appear to be no reason
for the forwarding of a statement of that particular
account.




Approved unanimously.