View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for May 2Q, 1959.

To:

Members of the Board

From:

Office of the Secretary

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard
to the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will
advise the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, if you
were present at the meeting, please initial in
column A below to indicate that you approve the
minutes. If you were not present, please initial
In column B below to indicate that you have seen
the minutes.
A
Chin. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. King




Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
on Wednesday, May 20 1959.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

The Board met in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.

Balderston, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
Mills
Robertson
Shepardson
King
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Discount rates.

Sherman, Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Farrell, Director, Division of Bank Operations
Solomon, Assistant General Counsel
Hexter, Assistant General Counsel
Hostrup, Assistant Director, Division of
Examinations
Nelson, Assistant Director, Division of
Examinations
Goodman, Assistant Director, Division of
Examinations
Benner, Assistant Director, Division of
Examinations
Hill, Assistant to the Secretary

The establishment without change by the Federal

Reserve Banks of Boston and Atlanta on May 18, 1959, of the rates on
discounts and advances in their existing schedules was approved
unanimously, with the understanding that appropriate advice would

be sent to those Banks.
Items circulated to the Board.

The following items, which

had been circulated to the Board, with appropriate supporting information, and copies of which are attached to these minutes under the
respective item numbers indicated, were approved unanimously:




It

5/20/59

-2Item No.

Letter to The First National City Bank of New York,
New York City, approving the establishment of a
branch in Guayaquil, Ecuador. (For transmittal
through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York)

1

Letter to the Catskill National Bank and Trust
Company, Catskill, New York, approving its supplemental application for fiduciary powers. (For transmittal through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York)

2

Letter to The County Trust Company, White Plains, New
York, approving the relocation of its branch at 333
South Fulton Avenue, Mount Vernon, to South Columbus
Avenue and Colonial Place. (For transmittal through
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York)

3

Letter to the Millburn-Short Hills Bank, Millburn, New
Jersey, granting an extension of time within which to
accomplish membership in the System. (For transmittal
through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York)

4

Letter to The Dulaney National Bank of Marshall, Marshall,
Illinois, approving its application for fiduciary powers.
(For transmittal through the Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago)

5

Prior tax certification with respect to The Kemper
Investment Company, Kansas City, Missouri. (For transmittal to the Company through the Federal Reserve Bank of
Kansas City, and with a duplicate original to the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue)

6

Letter to the First National Bank of Jonesboro, Jonesboro,

7

Arkansas, regarding its surrender of the authority to
exercise fiduciary powers. (For transmittal through the
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis)
Letter to the Hereford State Bank, Hereford, Texas, waiving
GiX months' notice of withdrawal from membership in the
Federal Reserve System. (For transmittal through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas)




8

9

5/20/59

-3Item No.

Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas regarding
the applicability of section 32 of the Banking Act of
1933 to the service of Mr. Henry E. Dahlberg as a
director of the Southern Arizona Bank and Trust Company,
Tucson, Arizona. (With a copy to the Federal Reserve
Bank of Kansas City in view of a related case that had
arisen in that District)

9

Messrs. Nelson, Goodman, and Benner then withdrew from the
meeting.
Services for member banks

(Item No. 10).

There had been

distributed to the Board a draft of reply to a letter from Mr. Mitchell,
Chairman of the Board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, dated
May

1, 1959, requesting the Board's consideration of a resolution

adopted by the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Atlanta which urged the management of the Bank to (1) study the
feasibility of an increase in armored car service with a view to
serving eventually practically the entire membership of the Sixth
Federal Reserve District and (2) investigate the cost of supplying
the member banks with wrapped coin and determine whether this service
could be furnished without charge or, if necessary, at a nominal cost.
This resolution had been initiated by a Special Committee on Member
Bank Services composed of directors of the Sixth District, appointed
to make a study of possibilities of broadening the services rendered
by the Federal Reserve Bank to its member banks.




5/2o/59
Mr. Farrell commented that Mr. Mitchell's letter reflected
awareness of the Board s recent request that the Presidents' Conference
review the basis for computing the costs of the coin wrapping operation
with a view to securing reimbursement of substantially the costs
involved for those Banks desiring to provide the service.

With

respect to armored car service, Mr. Farrell said a case could be
made for its extension in view of the poor mail service to many points
in the Atlanta District.
During the discussion which followed, the suggestion was made
that the letter be phrased in such a manner as to point out clearly
that supplying member banks with currency and coin without charge was
an appropriate and essential function of the Reserve Banks, whereas
in the Board's view coin wrapping was not in the same category.
In connection with the possible extension of armored car
service, attention was called to a tentative strike of armored car
drivers in the Pittsburgh area and question was raised as to the
advisability of abandoning United States mail service and extending
armored car service in view of the possibility of interruptions of
service.

The suggestion was made that the letter contain no impli-

cation that the Board was urging the use of armored cars, particularly
since absndonment of the use of registered mail might mean that this
service would not be available if a future need for it should arise.




5/20/59
In response to a question as to whether any Reserve Bank had
made a study of the desirability of owning and operating its own
armored cars as an alternative to contracting with a private company,
Mr. Farrell said he was not aware of any study regarding possible use
Of Bank-owned trucks except in a Reserve Bank city but that he would
look into the matter.
With respect to the possibility of a strike in the Pittsburgh
area, it was suggested that a similar strike may have occurred elsewhere and that the Pittsburgh Branch might find helpful the experience
of the Reserve Bank concerned. It was brought out during this
discussion that arrangements reportedly had been made for certain
Pittsburgh companies to pick up funds to meet payrolls at the Branch
their own trucks if armored car service used by member banks should
be affected by a strike.

Question was raised whether such a practice

was advisable, and it was understood that the Division of Bank
OPsrations would discuss the matter with the management of the
Pittsburgh Branch.
The letter to Mr. Mitchell then was approved unanimously in a
form reflecting the suggestions agreed upon at this meeting.

A copy

of the letter sent pursuant to this action is attached as Item No. 10.
Mr. Smith, Assistant Director, Division of Examinations, entered
the room during the foregoing discussion.




5/20/59

-6Safekeeping practices of Federal Reserve Banks.

In its letter

of September 19, 1957, the Board requested the Presidents' Conference
to review the entire subject of safekeeping facilities.

The Subcommittee

on Cash, Leased Wire, and Sundry Operations subsequently submitted a
report on the matter, which was accepted by the Presidents' Conference
at its February 1958 meeting and was discussed with the Board at that
time.

On December 8, 1958, the Board addressed a letter to Mr. Erickson,

Chairman of the Presidents' Conference, in which it was (1) noted that
the acceptance by the Presidents of the Subcommittee report mentioned
above represented basically a reaffirmation of decisions reached upon
earlier occasions by the Presidents' Conference and the Board, and
(2) suggested that a current statement of general policy be agreed
upon along lines which were set forth in that letter.

When this

statement was considered by the Presidents at a special session on
January 6, 1959, some of the Presidents suggested that certain changes
might be desirable in the light of present circumstances, and it was
then agreed that any additions to or deletions from the proposed
statement should be submitted to the Committee on Miscellaneous
Operations.

A modified statement was presented to the Conference

On March 23, 1959, incorporating practically all the suggestions
submitted by the several Reserve Banks so that in effect it recognized

the various safekeeping practices which were currently deemed desirable




5/20/59
by the Reserve Banks.

During the joint meeting of the Board and the

Presidents on March 24,

1959,

the modified statement of general policy

vas reviewed and the Presidents were advised that the Board would give
consideration to the proposed statement and inform the Conference of
its views.
Under date of May 13, 1959, there had been distributed to the
Board a memorandum from the Division of Bank Operations containing a
comparative analysis of the modified statement and the statement
Proposed. by the Board.

Submitted with the memorandum were alternative

draft letters to the Presidents of all Federal Reserve Banks (1)
accepting the proposed policy statement and (2) setting forth a brief
statement of broad policy.
In commenting on the modified statement proposed by the
Presidents' Conference, Mr. Farrell said that the policy was less
restrictive than might appear to be the case due to the insertion
Of various catch-all phrases.

Accordingly, he suggested that in

lieu of such a detailed statement, the Board might wish to consider
a broad general statement which he thought would have the same practical
effect as the statement adopted by the Presidents.
During the discussion that followed, some opinion was expressed
in favor of the issuance of a general statement such as proposed by
the Division of Bank Operations, thus leaving a broad scope of administrative discretion to the Banks.




A second view was that the policy

5/2o/59
statement should be more detailed and that to leave the interpretation
Of a broad policy to the discretion of the individual Banks would result
U1 a variation in practices.

In time, it was suggested, practices would

tend to gravitate to the level of the most liberal Bank.

It was also

Pointed out that under a broad policy examiners might lack adequate
criteria for evaluating safekeeping practices in the Reserve Banks.
Question was raised as to the validity of the vault adequacy
test for reserve city banks and whether the policy statement should
not restrict the holding of securities for reserve city banks to
"limited periods."

It was pointed out that both the vault adequacy

test and the time limitation were originslly included to permit the
holding of securities of a reserve city bank temporarily in need of
vault space.
The suggestion then was me that a letter to the Reserve
Banks be drafted which would contain a policy statement to the effect
that the Banks would hold securities in safekeeping only when such
h°1ding5 contributed to the efficient and economical operations of
the Banks or were otherwise in the public interest and were consistent
vith the purposes of the System.

This general statement would be

sUPPlemented by examples of types of holdings that would or would
not be consistent with such a policy, with the examples drawn from
out
standing letters to the Reserve Banks.
After further discussion, it was agreed that a letter along
sUch lines would be prepared for the Board's consideration.




5/20/59
Messrs. Hexter, Hostrup, and Smith then withdrew from the
meeting and Messrs. Thomas, Economic Adviser to the Board, and Shay)
Legislative Counsel, entered the room.
Letter to Congressman Kilburn (Item No. 11).

Governor

Balderston related to the Board that a telephone request had been
received from the office of Congressman Kilburn of New York for
comment regarding a letter dated May 19, 1959, that Congressman
Patman addressed to members of the House Committee on Banking and
Currency in connection with H.R. 5237, a bill "to amend member bank
reserve requirements".

In the letter, Mr. Patman stated that the

Federal Reserve in effect, was saying that it wanted to transfer
about *15 billion of Government bonds to the commercial banks
because they needed the profits from them and that he would ask
the Committee
to conduct further hearings on the bill.

Mr. Kilburn

wished to make a statement tomorrow at the committee meeting and
was desirous of receiving the Board's comments.
Mr. Thomas distributed to the members of the Board a draft
°f reply to Congressman Kilburn and a memorandum proposed to be
enclosed.

The memorandum was similar in form to one previously

PrePared by members of the staff at the request of Congressman
Hiestand of
California and dealt with the principal points made
by Congressman Patman at the hearings before Subcommittee No. 2
'
legarding H.R. 5237.




•;`97
5/20/59

-10Following a discussion, during which a suggestion was made

for a change in the draft of letter to Congressman Kilburn, the Board

iitTknanT1 unanimously a letter in the form attached as Item

No. 11, with

the understanding that copies of the letter and memorandum would be sent
to Chairman Spence of the House Banking and Currency Committee and
Chairman Brown of Subcommittee No. 2, House Bnnking and Currency
Committee.

The meeting then adjourned.




Secretary's Note: Pursuant to the recommendation
contained in a memorandum dated May 12, 1959, from
Mr. Kelleher, Director, Division of Administrative
Services, Governor Shepardson, acting on behalf of
the Board, today granted permission to Wilbert L.
Stephens, Laborer in that Division, to continue
part-time outside employment as a parkin attendant
for the Doggett Parking Company.

Seretary

4

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 1
5/20/59

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE HOARD

May 20, 1959.

The First National City Bank of New York,
55 Wall Street,
New York, New York.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
New York,
authorizes The First National City Bank of New York,
New York, pursuant to the provisions of Section 25 of the
Ecuador,
Federal Reserve Act, to establish a branch in Guayaquil,
and to operate and maintain such branch subject to the probranch
visions of such Section, upon condition that, unless the
before
or
on
business
for
opened
is actually established and
June 1, 1960, all rights granted hereby shall be deemed to have
been abandoned and the authority hereby granted shall automatically terminate on such date.
Please advise the Board of Governors in writing, through
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, when the branch is estabthe
lished and opened for business, furnishing information as to
will
change
no
that
d
understoo
is
It
branch.
exact location of the
be made in the location of the branch after establishment without
the prior approval of the Board of Governors.




Very truly yours,

(Signed) Kenneth A. Kenyon
Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.

J •

•

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

44tatt044
Off Cop 400

OF THE

6

Item No. 2
5/20/59

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

,Lttse.
NI****

May 201 1959.

Board of Directors,
Catskill National Bank End
Trust Company,
Catskill, New York.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
SYstem has given consideration to your supplemental apPlication for fiduciary powers, and, in addition to the
authority heretofore granted to act as trustee, executor,
administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of
estates, assignee, receiver, and comittee of estates of
lunatics, grants you authority to act, when not in contravention of State or local law, in any other fiduciary capacity in which State banks, trust companies, or other
corporations which come into competition with national
banks are permitted to act under the laws of the State
of New York. The exercise of all such powers shall be
subject to the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and
the regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System.
A formal certificate indicating the fiduciary
Powers that Catskill National Bank and Trust Company is
now authorized to exercise will be forwarded to you in
due course.




Very truly yours,

(Signed) Kenneth A. Kenyon
Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
et+
6;ttp,

OF THE

Item No. 3

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

5/20/59

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

PASI.

May 201 1959.

Board of Directors,
The County Trust, Company,
White Plains, New York.
Gentlenen:
PusiLant to your request submitted through the
Federal Res( rve Bank of New York, the I;oard of Governors of
tie Federal Reserve Systela approves tho relocation of the
branch presently located at 333 South Fulton Avenue, Nount
New York, to a new location in the vicinity of the
intersection of South Columbus Avenue and Colonial Place,
ount Vernon, Now York. This approval is given provicleC the
branch is entablished at the new location within one yonr from
the date of thin letter.

yernon,




Very truly yours,

(Signed) Kenneth A. Kenyon
Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 4
5/20/59

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

ADDRESS orriciAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARO

1, V 20, 1959.

Board of Directors,
Millburn-Short Hills Bank,
Millburn, New Jersey.
Gentlemen:
In accordance with a request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Board of Governors extends to August 24, 1959, the time within which MillburnShort Hills Bank, Millburn, New Jersey, may accomplish admisslon to membership in the Federal Reserve System, as outlined
in the Board's letter of November 25, 1958.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Kenneth A. Kenyon
Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

Item No. 5

5/20/59

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

May 20, 1959.

Board of Directors,
The Dulaney National Bank
Of Marshall,
Marshall, Illinois.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
has given comie.eration to your application for fiduciary powers
and grants you authority to act, when not in contravention of
State or local law, as trustee, executor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of estates, assignee, receiver, committee of estates of lunatics, or in any other fiduci417 capacity in which State banks, trust companies, or other
"rPorations which come into competition with national banks
are permitted to act under the laws of the State of Illinois,
the exercise of all such rights to be subject to the provisions
Of Section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation F of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
A formal certificate indicating the fiduciary powers
that Tho Dulaney National Bank of Marshall is now authorized to
exercise will be forwarded to you in due course.




Very truly yours,

(Signed) KennethA. Kenyon
Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WAS

Item No. 6

5/20/59

CERTIFICATION

1. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has
been informed by The Kemper Investment Company, Kansas City, Missouri,
that it proposes to distribute to its shareholders on a pro rata basis
the following shares of bank stock:
Number of Shares

Name of Bank
The City National Bank and Trust Company
of Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
The Citizens National Bank of Emporia,
Emporia, Kansas
Grand Avenue Bank of Kansas City,
Kansas City, Missouri
Kemper State Bank,
Boonville, Missouri
Clay County State Bank,
Excelsior Springs, Missouri
The First National Bank of Independence,
Independence, Missouri
The Fourth National Bank in Wichita,
Wichita, Kansas

133,360
11 201i

3,334
4,800

5,976
76,722

2. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1101(b) and section
1103(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, the Board of Governors
(3f the Federal Reserve System hereby certifies that:

(a) The Kemper Investment Company satisfies the requirements of

subsection (b) of section 1103 of the Internal Revenue Code
'
,qualified bank holding corporation,
of 1954 and therefore is a '
as defined in that subsection.

(b) The shares of bank stock enumerated in 1,1” above, are all or

part of the property by reason of which The Kemper Investment
the
Company controls (within the meaning of section 2(a) of
banks.
named
the
1956)
of
Bank Holding Company Act

enum(c) The proposed distribution of the shares of bank stock
policies
the
e
effectuat
to
te
appropria
erated hereinabove is
of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.
of the
Executed in Washington, D. C., pursuant to direction
System.
Reserve
hoard of Governors of the Federal

(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman, Secretary.

(3v.:AL)

Date: may 20,


1959.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
io

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 7
5/20/59

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

T
"
:
e,
rtistt
'ootto**

May 20, 1959.

First National Bank of Jonesboro,
Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Gentlemen:
This refers to the resolution adopted on December 16, 1958,
bY the board of directors of your bank, signifying its desire to sur
Fender the authority to exercise fiduciary powers heretofore granted
03r the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
The Board, understanding that your
or otherwise properly relieved in accordance
ita duties as fiduciary, has issued a formal
that the First National Bank of Jonesboro is
exercise any oC the fiduciary powers covered
section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve Act, as
ioate is enclosed.

bank has been discharged
with the law of all of
certificate to the effect
no longer authorized to
by the provisions of
amended. This certif-

In this connection, your attention is called to the fact
th +
A a., under the provisions of section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve
as amended, when such a certificate has been issued by the Board
'11- Governors of the Federal Reserve System to a national bank, such
2111k (1) shall no longer be subject to the provisions of section 11(k)
vr the regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
5Tutem made pursuant thereto, (2) shall be entitled to have returned
i?).t any securities which it may have deposited with the State authorfor the protection of private or court trusts, and (3) shall not
sroise thereafter any of the powers granted by the Board pursuant to
i"s provisions of section 11(k) without first applying for and obtaine new permit to exercise such powers.

j

Very truly yours,

(Signed) Kenneth A. Kenyon
Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.
41o1osure




BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 8

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

5/20/59

WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

May 20

1959.

kard of Directors,
Rereford State Bank,
Rereford, Texas.
ClentlftMen:

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas has forwarded to the
kard of Governors your letter of April 24, 1959, and the accom1!!!Ying resolution signifying your intention to withdraw from mem7
8 8hiP in the Feeral Reserve System and requesting waiver of the
44c months' notico of such withdrawal.
In a,.;eordance with your request, the Board of Governors
f
I 4-ves the recjiirement of six months' notice of withdrawal. Upon
Da'irvrender to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas of the Federal
72erve Bank stock issued to your institution, such stock will be
7
p celed and appropriate refund will be made thereon. Under the
fwisions of section 10(c) of the Board's Regulation H, your bank
terminate membership in the Federal Reserve System at any time
thin eight months after notice of intention to withdraw from
m
blembership
was given. It is requested that the certificate of
etabership be returned to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.




Very truly yours,

(Signed) Kenneth A. Kenyon

Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
t2f,

-,:*
,,,,.
t
lr

.

,

Item No. 9,

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

5/20/59

WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

"00404

May 20, 1959.

Mr. L. G. Pondrom, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas,
Dallas 2, Texas.
Dear Mr. Pondrom:
Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of April 2, 1959,
and enclosures, relating to the question whether Mr. Henry E.
tahlberg may continue to serve as a director of the Southern
Arizona Bank and Trust Company, TUcson, Arizona, in view of the
Provisions of section 32 of the Banking Act of 1933.
As pointed out in your letter and the comprehensive
memorandum of counsel which you enclosed, the question has been
considered previously, and on the basis of the figures for the
Years prior to 1957, the Board concluded that section 32 was not
ePPlicable. The year 1956 shoved a rather large volume of seci°11 32 business but was regarded as unusual because it included
items which it was thought were not likely to recur. Therefore,
although the question appeared to be a very close one, the Board
stated that business of the kind described in section 32 need not
at that time be regarded as one of the primary activities of
J• A. Hogle & Co.
However, the information submitted with your letter indicates that the total volume of underwriting and distributing has,
contrary to expectations, increased, and the totals have been
19 million for 1956, $8 million for 1957, and over $24 million for
958, the ratio of income from this business to total gross income
being 10.62 per cent, 10.06 per cent, and 11.22 per cent, respectively, for these three years.
The Supreme Court said in Board of Governors v. Agnew,
329 U.S. 441, "If the underwriting business of a firm is substantial,
the .13,
1rm is engaged in the underwriting business in a primary way
• The line between substantial and unsubstantial seems to us
to be
the one indicated by the words 'primarily engaged'."




7
,..

.„ i

Mr. L. G. Pondrom

Your counsel points out that the experience of your Bank
in section 32 matters
has been limited. However, a review of the
eases considered by the Board under this statute shows that
in
cases where the total volume of sectio
n 32 business was large
($10 or $15 million and over), the Board
has held that the firm
1418.8 "primarily engaged" in such business, even though the income
from that source was considerably
less than 10 per cent (or in one
case even less than 5 per cent)
of the total income of the firm.
Conslatently with
the position taken in these cases, it appears that
J. A. Bogle & Co. should be regarde
d as primarily engaged in the
business described in section 32 and that Mr. Dahlberg may no
longer
serve as a director of the member
bank.




Very truly yours,

(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 10
5/20/59

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

May 20, 1959
Mr, Walter
M. Mitchell,
Chairman of the Board,
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta,
Atlanta 3, Georgia.
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
This is in reply to your letter of May 1, 1959 enclosing
,
f
.,or the Board's consideration a resolution adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta pertaining to
8?rvices rendered by the Reserve Bank to its member banks, partic144arlY the wrapping of coin and the extension of armored car service
fl over-the-road shipment of money. It is noted that this resolution
:as initiated by a newly appointed Special Committee on Member Bank
Services composed of directors of the Sixth District which was
appointed to make a study of possibilities of broadening the services
rendered by the Federal Reserve Bank to its member banks.
The Board agrees with your Committee that the Federal Reserve
System should do everything reasonably possible for the member
banks,
ever, thereby making membership in the System more attractive. Howbecause of the quasi-public nature of the Federal Reserve Banks
B d the interest of the Federal Government in their net earnings, the
2ard feels that
the free services which are offered to member banks
Should be
confined
as a general practice to those that may be considered
as a proper function of a central bank.
The resolution adopted by your Directors urges that the
'44gement of the Atlanta Bank pursue diligently the feasibility of
.!'.,reater increase in the armored car service of the Reserve Bank,
:11.th the
view of eventually serving practically the entire membership
se the Sixth Federal Reserve District. Inasmuch as the Federal Rethrvs Banks are the primary source of supply for currency and coin,
the
Board has consistently taken the position that delivery service
t1
,
ne, 1is connection should be furnished all member banks on a basis as
tu
:
r-LY
turn)" equal as may be possible. The means by which this service is
a matter which has been left largely for the individual
serve
Banks to decide in the light of the dictates of prudent

7




BOARD

Mr. Walter

N.

OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Litchell

tanagement. While the Board recognizes that there are advantages in
armored car service, it feels that caution should be used in any program that would rely completely, or to a large degree, on a means of
nipment that is more subject to interruption (for example, by strikes)
'Ilan is the United States mail service. Abandonment of the use of
!'egistered mail might mean that this service would not be available
lf a future need for it should arise.
As its second objective, the resolution requests the Reserve
Bank management to investigate the cost of supplying wrapped coin to
member banks and to determine whether this service can be furnished
without charge, or, if believed necessary, at a nominal cost. The
resolution further suggests that it would be highly desirable for some
IT)ncessions to be made in this respect, particularly to the smaller
2nks. As your letter indicates, the idea of furnishing wrapped coin
ithout charge or at nominal cost is contrary to the position taken
the Board in its letter of February 3, 1959, asking the Conference
Presidents to review the basis for computing the costs of the coinZaPPing operation with a view toward securing reimbursement for subQLantially
the costs involved.

z

There is a substantial difference of opinion as to whether
thep
pop
furnishing
of wrapped coin is a proper function of the Federal
,Leeerve
Banks. In taking the position that this was a matter that
;
1ght be left to the judgment of the management of the individual
m:serve Banks, the Board was partly influenced by the argument that
tl,nY small banks cannot afford modern coin-wrapping equipment and that
ere are economies inherent in a centralized operation. However, the
tr,ard does not believe that these arguments carry persuasive reasons
ti'ir furnishing the service at less than cost. The Board feels that
,,e wrapping of coin is essentially a retail type of operation that
;es beyond the function of the Reserve Banks as the primary source
ti suPply for currency and coin. For these reasons, the Board conei-rples to believe that, while there may be some justification for
r ,
cting economies through the offering of centralized wrapping
a;
ellities, it is inappropriate for the Reserve Banks to provide this
oe at substantially less than cost.
The resolution adopted by the Directors of your Bank also
s that the Board consider a suitable upward adjustment in the
bt
th.,.get of the Atlanta Bank to take care of the proposed extension of
th
'
:
e armored car and coin-wrapping services. It is assumed that, in
eo, light of this letter, no steps will be taken to furnish wrapped
4-11 without charge or at a nominal cost. Any excess expenditures




IMARD OF C3OVERNOR3 or TliE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

lia

r M. Mitchell

1!;ulting from an extension of the armored car service or from adop'
4-on of coin-wrapping service on a cost basis would be matters to be
IStilled in the budget experience report submitted after the end of
'le Year. Accordingly, it would appear that no budget adjustment by
le Board would be necessary in this connection.

t

The Board is grateful for the interest your Directors have
take .
n in these matters and for the opportunity to present its views
L° You




Very truly yours

Merritt S er
Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 11
5/20/59

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF THE VICE CHAIRMAN

May 201

1959.

The Honorable Clarence E. Kilburn,
House of Representatives,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Mr. Kilburn:
In response to your request for comments regarding
Congressman Patman's letter of May 19 addressed to Members of
House Committee on Banking and Currency, I am enclosing a copy
Of a memorandum prepared by members of the Board's staff with
respect to Mr. Patman's statement presented at the hearings before Subcommittee No. 2 regarding H.R. 5237.
Mr. Patman's comments deal primarily with the use by
the Federal Reserve of its powers to vary reserve requirements of
member banks and to increase or decrease through open market operations the supply of reserves available to member banks. The System
already has such powers, which are inherent in its responsibility
to adjust the availability of bank credit and the money supply to
the needs of the economy for the maintenance of growth and stability.
1141. 5237 is primarily designed to remove from the present law some
structural inequities and difficulties of administration and only
incidentally and to a relatively minor extent affects the System's
existing authority to influence the over-all availability of reserves to the banking system.
In my testimony before Subcommittee No. 21 I indicated
clearly the Board's intention to use the additional authority
Fantod by the bill in a manner that would not conflict with the
uroader aims of monetary policy.




Sincerely yours,

(Signed) C. Canby Balderston
C. Canby Balderston,
Vice Chairman.