View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System on Friday, May 18, 1951.
'rY at 9:40
libre

The Board met in the Special

a.m.

PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Eccles
Szymczak
Norton
Powell
Carpenter) Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Murff, Assistant Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Thomas, Economic Adviser to the Board
Leonard, Director, Division of Bank Operations
Vest, General Counsel
Young, Director, Division of Research and
Statistics
Mr. Wayne: Acting Director, Division of
Examinations
Mr. Noyes, Director, Division of Selective
Credit Regulation
Mr. Sloan, Assistant Director, Division of
Examinations

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Before this meeting there had been submitted a memorandum covering
to
"ce to be
discussed at a joint meeting of the Board and the Presidents of
the 1,
'ederal
Reserve Banks to be held today at 10:30 o'clock. The Board
c°4414tered. vli__
e topics listed, and it was agreed that the views of the
11c)111d be stated substantially as recorded in the minutes of the joint

Mr.
111
letter

Norton presented a memorandum dated May 17, 1951 stating that
dated May 16 the Housing and Home Finance Administrator advised




5/18/51
tli° 88

-2a result of a survey made by the Housing and Home Finance Agency

it had been determined that an urgent need existed for 250 housing units
to be located within reasonable commuting distance of Fort Leonard Wood,
4) Missouri that the Defense Production Administration had certified
the a
rea as a defense area for the purposes of special assistance, that
the AA_
ttwainistrator had concluded that the area should be designated as a
604

area for the purpose of special action to assist in the production

"
4

or lie

cessarY housing, and that the Administrator recommended that if
het
(riation of the area was concurred in by the Board the schedule of
credit terms under Regulation
t44t

X,

Real Estate Credit, be the same as

11
011.

a-,--0ved for Atomic Energy Commission installations in South Carolina,
-4) and Idaho.

The memorandum also stated that Mr. Norton concurred

th
8

re
commendation.
Thereupon, upon motion by Mr.
Norton, unanimous approval was given to
a letter to Mr. Foley, Housing and Home
Finance Administrator, as follows:

is ,"In response to your letter of May 161 19)1, this
0 advise you that the Board of Governors concurs in
'
aesignation of the Fort Leonard Wood Area, Rolla,
credit
te -s°1111, as an area for application of special
Estate
Real
X,
Regulation
linder
section 6 (P) of
Orlelms
for purposes of defense construction. Your
10‘ter states
that there is a need for 250 units to be
:
Iated Within reasonable commuting distance of Fort
Le
previous
'
d 1400d. It is our understanding, based on
15-6'er68.tion5 with representatives of your Agency, that
,its
141
are to be held for rental only, and the re,
4184
retZ'llg 100 units are to be offered for sale. Purchase and
--81 of the entire 250 units will be controlled by the




5/18/>1

—3—

commander of the post through the issuance of affidavits of
e
ligibil!ty.
"In accordance with your suggestion, the relaxation o/
terms prescribed by Regulation X will be identical with that
Previously announced for the Atomic Energy Commission Installations in South Carolina, Kentucky, and Idaho."
t this point all of the members of the staff with the exception
°f111°"rs. Carpenter, Sherman, Murff, and Kenyon withdrew and the action
sta.te,
Lk with reci-ect to each of the matters hereinafter referred to was
take by
the Board:
MinUte0 of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal

11E.
ve aystem on May 17, 1951, were approved unanimously.
Telegrams to the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston, New York,
°11-)hia)tianta, Chicago,and St. Louis stating that the Board
qProly
the establishment without change by the Federal Reserve Banks
"
'
eIlt4 and St. Louis on May 16, by the Federal Reserve Banks of New
3ork,
hiladelphia,and Chicago on May 17, and by the Federal Reserve

4nd of

11°"ten
istin

tolzy, of the rotes of discount and purchase in their

s
chedules.
Approved unanimously.

Me.
morand= dated Muy 10, 1951, from Mr. Bethea, Director of the
ision _
Qf Administrative Services, recommending the appointment of
MI.
Valeri.,
V. Fatna as a charwoman in that Division on a temporary
'

blv

aie

for
Der
Nm-

a Period of two months, with basic salary at the rate of -,21120

'effective as of the date upon which she enters upon the perOf her dutien after having passed the usual physical examination,
2lbe t to the
completion of a satisfactory employment investigation.




Approved unanimously.

5/18/51

-4-

Letter to Mr. Bryan, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Atlanta,
reading as follows:
"The Board of Governors approves the payment of
salary to Mr. Melvin McIlwain as an officer of the
Birmingham Branch with the title of Assistant Cashier
at the rate of $6,000 per annum for the period June 1,
1951) through May 31, 1952. According to your letter
(3f May 11, 1951, this is the rate which has been apProved by your Board of Directors."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. DeMoss, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank
bal

4-Les, reading as follows:
"Reurtel May 14, 1951, concerning application of
Regulation W to $1,600 loan for moving owner's house to
!different lot and for doing other necessary work in
;()11.4ection therewith, including sewer arid water connections.
211 Point out that removal of house is required because
coudemnation proceedings covering original location of
house
"As you indicnte X-27 treats similar transactions as
construction' under Regulation X if they involve an
°11.11t in excess of $2,500. The transaction in question,
Reliever) would be subject to the Group D requirements of
„g4lation W as residential repairs, alterations, or im1Zove1ients to an existing structure and would not qualify
'
1 exemption under section 7(h)(1) of the regulation.'

Z

Approved unanimously.
je

Letter to the U. S. Appliance Company, 77 Main Street, South R:rer,
reading as follows:

to 4:This refers to your letter of May 9, 1951, pertaining
01.1,'Lle effects of Regulation W on instalment sales of
thesell°1d appliances. It is suggested in your letter that
to regulation be changed to allow trade-ins on such sales
C1/11t against the down payment requirement as is permitted
by ZI,
regulation for instalment sales of automobiles.




5/18/51
"Present trade-in rules under the regulation have
been in effect since Regulation W was first issued by
the Board in 1941. For reasons that have seemed to be
e°111De11ing, the approach to the regulation of automobile
instalment credit has been and is different from the
aPProach in the appliance and furniture areas.
"In administering the regulation the Board makes
everY practicable effort, consistent with the purposes
of the regulation, to avoid disturbing established
competitive relationships between sellers of the different
regulated articles. To some extent all of the listed
articles compete with each other for a share of the condisposable income. A major relaxation for one
!_rcpul) of regulated articles would tend to create imporcant inequities unless there was also such an equivalent
relaxation for competing articles. This would amount to
!general relaxation that would tend to nullify the effecOkreness of the regulation.
The consumer credit regulation must be restrictive,
course, if it is to accomplish its major purpose of
ielPing to restrain general inflationary forces by curbconsumer instalment credit. While the Board does not
:"..sh to be excessively restrictive in the case of individual
cles or industries, nevertheless in carrying out its
atsPonsibilities under the Defense Production Act it must
the same time consider the necessity of curbing the
oft}ationary effect of instalment credit in the interests
,
country as a whole in this period of national emerPserleY.
"Although the Board recognizes that there has been a
rol;!eral softening in the markets for consumer durable goods
zlevi°14ing the heavy buying wave of last December and January,
co ertheless,
in the light of general economic and credit
th itions, the suggested relaxation of the regulation at
tat,' time does not appear to be in the interest of the
kiloal defense program.
probl The Board is continuing to study the particular
eills of the appliance dealers including those that
kiRh;
the
rei-tii arise from the present down payment provisions of
this
in
coh,ation, and we are glad to have your view
-m'sction.”




Approved unanimously.

*

5118/51

-6Letter to the Honorable

iliiam i. Knowland, United States Senate,

6.81112agton, D. C., reading as follows:
"Thank you for referring to the Board of Governors
Mr, Lovick B. Pearce's letter of March 26 concerning res
trictions on real estate credit. As you knov, the rewere authorized by Congress in the Defense
Production Act of 1950 for the purpose of combating inflation and conserving materials. In order to achieve these
°I)jectives it has been necessary to place restrictions
°4 the financing of houses built by individuals for their
1,!4 use as well as houses built for sale to others. Both
ffie beefl important elements in the increased production
;JI
and the regulation is equally restrictive in
both
cases
housing,
"The regulation requires that a certain proportion
cg' the cost of a new house be met from the buyer's own
: 11.rce5. Unfortunately, this requirement makes it diffifor seine persons to buy a new house,
: Or impossiblem
1;'
"' if this were not the case, the regulation would not
ut achieving its
objective.
buil "It is our view that individuals who are buying or
rpl ding more expensive houses should be required to make
i',:ftively larger down payments than thoue buying or buildsMaller and less expensive houses. In Mr. Pearce's
lic ance, based on the facts he stated, the regulation
require a down payment of approximately $12,500.
Th--d
e
th. regulation, however, would allow all or any part of
e amount to be met from the proceeds of the sale of
thl8
i4 securities which Mx. Pearce mentions, or from borrowa life insurance policy.
"Mr. Pearce mentions a clipping from the Wall Street
vo.17.1-411 which, in his mind at least, gives 'relief to the
Thil°116 organizations that are doing so much building'.
ceil liPPing was not attached to the letter when we reSee 4 it/ but it apparently referred to the addition of
;'°4 5(g) to the regulation. That amendment was equally
..
i "`eable to individuals and large companies building multiek„" residential and nonresidential construction. It was
to provide relief where substantial commitments or
lkings had been made before the imposition of credit
co0,;
:
Qls mad there was an inability to obtain credit to
fin
bo;;Ilcu the construction on the basis contemplated by the
°I
'ler and lender prior to the imposition of the controls,

appi
114a




5/18/51

-7-

ahd compliance with the regulation would cause a clear and
substantial financial hardship. A similar provision applicable to persons building residential property was made in
the regulation when first issued last October.
"We hope this will help to explain the Board's position
oh the matter. If we can be of further assistance, please
do not hesitate to call upon us."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the honorable Burnet R. Maybank, Chairman, Committee
'ang and Currency, United States Senate, Washington, D. C., prepared
1.1

t to action taken by the Board on April 23, 19)1, reading as follows:

j
"This is in response to Mr. McMurray's letter of
teztlarY 25, 1951, requesting a report on S. )15, a bill
o (mend the Reconstruction Finance Corporation Act.
s. "The principal changes which would be effected by
)
1
)include the substitution of a single administrator
(governor) for the five-man board of directors (This has
orr.!adY been accomplished by Reorganization Plan No. 1
951, Prepared in accordance with the Reorganization
Act
1919.); use of appropriated funds rather than funds
Ix
;of 1949.);
e24rewed directly from the Treasury; the Corporation to
eaIablich bz interest rate on its loans calculated to pay
exPenses as well as to provide an adequate reserve fer
10::es; and the maintenance of records and a system or reth
"
.e s which will Insure proper accounting controls and keep
th Congress adequately informed as to operations. Under
is
be
bill, as under existing law, the Corporation would
.11t
1118';orized to make loans in four main categories: (a) to
(olness enterprises, (b) to banks and insurance companies,
Lict_ ?,TItlic agencies owl (d) catastrophe loans.
report is confined to that portion of the bill
Which
relates to the lending functions of the RFC. The
a
rc1
aer telieves that any credit necessary for the national
1\Zise or other purposes should be made available to the
/4 Jet extent possible through private credit channels.
kay. e exceptional cases in which Government assistance
e required, guarantees of loans made by private institu'
tiorl
%/az :,are more desirable than direct Government loans. This
'e
Al basis of the V-lonn program which was so successful




24

5/18/51

-8-

"during World War II and which has been reinstated during
the present emergency. If the powers of the RFC to make
direct loans are to be continued, they should be in such
form as to require that loans may be made only in the exceptional cases in which credit is not available from
other sources including the V-loan program. The RFC was
established in 1932 as an emergency organization and the
Board feels that the Corporation should continue to be
es
sentially so regarded.
"In recent months the Government has found it neces!arY to adopt various measures in order to control dangerous
flflationary pressures in our economy and to conserve mavital to national defense. In the face of these
norts, therefore, it is difficult to perceive why the
vernment should be making direct loans to business exPt as authorized by the Defense Production Act of 1950.
,, "The Bureau of the Budget has advised that it has no
"oiection to the submission of this report."

r

Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Roger W. Jones, Assistant Director, Legislative
tier
uce, Bureau of
the Budget, Washington, D. C., reading as follows:
"This is in response to your communication of April 19,
1951
,
8
requesting an expression of the Board's views with reto a draft proposal of the Department of Agriculture
to° further amend the Farm Credit Act of 1933 with respect
00 coMmissions on debentures sold by the Central Bunk for
°P%atives, and for other purposes.'
r;osallIILthe
e
explanatory letter accompanying the draft proDepartment of Agriculture states that the limited
,2°se of the bill is to grant permission to national
b1.4
,s and State member banks to accept commissions in con4e
0
4
e() 41°11 with the sale of debentures of the Central Bank for
to°Peratives and that the draft is not designed generally
t8414cempt Central Bank debentures from the requirements of
Ta 5136 of the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 24).
000 The letter further states that the Central Bank for
thel
!
r"ives is in an unfavorable position with respect to
Fea:e•rketing of its securities as compared with that of the
land banks and Federal intermediate credit banks
e the latter are exempt from the requirements of Section 5136
'




5/18/51

-9-

are lt'ewicc rot subject to the requirements of the
'Investment Securities Regulation' promulg?ted by the
Comptroller of the Currency.
"The absence of a similar exemption for debentures
Of the Central Bank fcr Cooperatives has been construed
as Prohibiting national and State member hanks from ace_ePting such commissions with respect to Central Bank de,?satures purchased for the account of customers. Consequently,
order to have the assistance and cooperation of national
rilkE and State member banks, the Department of A6riculture
asires that before the next offering of Central Bank dothis group of institutions be permitted to accept
co
mmissions on such purchases.
"While the Board would have no objection to an amend;rat which would accomplish this limited purpose, it is
s!lieved that the language of the draft may well be conas going much further than intended -- possibly
,, far as to remove all the limitations and restrictions
action .5136.
1
In this connection it is suggested that
ataver language is finally decided upon might more appropri4,!e1Y be in the form of an amendment to that section rather
'
41/111 to the Farm Credit Act of 1933."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Charles A. Quattlebaum, Library of Congress Annex
4g, W
ashington, D. C., reading as follows:

se

"With reference to the questionnaire which you recently
/011z,! t° Mr. Bethea concerning a study for the use of the
cei.7e Committee on Education and Labor with regard to edup'
o c)nal projects and activities and to our subsequent telerotilla conversation concerning it, this letter is to inform
glin,,,tilat the Board of Governors does not have specific pro"s of educational activities of the type covered by your
41.8eVeral activities at the Board, however, are directed
tow :
tr" educational objectives in the broad sense of prokotw rig understanding by the public of the functions of money
scredit
Th;
and of the Federal Reserve System in our economy.
e activities center around the publications of the Board
theiX distribution. In some publications, such as the




5h8/51

-10-

monthly Federal Reserve Bulletin and the monthly Federal
1121trve Charts on Bank Credit Mone Rates and Business,
il:Iformation on and analyses of the business and credit
sltuation which have been prepared to enable the Board to
f
tulfill its statutory responsibilities are made available
° the public in order to promote a wider understanding
e'r money and credit developments and of the System's credit
Policies. a list of the Board's publications appears on
es 478-79 of the Bulletin for April, a copy of which is
'
11closed
"In other publications, such as The Federal Reserve
-- Its Purposes and Functions and Bankine, Stvlies,
?,4 effort is made to provide explanatory material on the
.Vderal Reserve and commercial banking system for the
allsinessman, the banker, the labor leader, and the stu,,,ent. These publications are also a by-product of the
4_egular work of the System's staff, but they are made
t°7ailable in special form for distribution to interested
Persons.
"Educational activities are also directly affected
bY the
Board's policy in distributing its publications.
Publications, especially the book on the System and
Lints
of Bulletin articles, are available without charge.
e
co raries of educational institutions are furnished free
Re.Pies of all publications upon request. In some Federal
oriserve districts certain publications have been provided
te
oemplimentary basis to the college and university
?rs of money and banking.
On occasions the Board has cooperated with individual
pea
et!
ral Reserve Banks in conducting short seminar sessions
Banks and the Board, through which college and univerto
teachers of money and banking are given an opportunity
ecome more familiar with the economic and financial
th'ecrMation developed, or in process of development, by
ob8e8Ystemi s research staff and also an opportunity to
or +rare and discuss first hand the functions and operations
eas"Lie Federal Reserve Banks and the Board. These seminars
lio?Dhave the indirect objective of broadening the pubnien,' understanding of the economy's monetary and credit
re,„"These various activities are integrated with the
ellrr duties and assignments of the staff of the Board
Banks, and as a consequence no special budget is




-71"7
AL,
/'
1

-11ft

maintained or could be maintained to cever them. All
exPenses of the Reserve Banks are covered by the income
earned by their operations, and the expenses of the Board
of Governors, which has statutory supervisory responsibility
with respect to the Banks, are assessed against the Banks
alad carried by them as expenses. No funds appropriated by
the Congress are involved in defraying any of the expenses
C)f the Federal Reserve System.
'Still another form of educational activity which may
11°t fall in the categories for which you are seeking infor1114,111tion is the preparation of films with respect to the Federal
'eserve System. The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
0
.er°Pared a film covering certain aspects of the operations
,1
'a Federal Reserve Bank designed for use particularly
44 high school classes, and the Board paid half the cost
c)f tile film or somewhrt less than *10,000. Distribution
()
1 f the film is handled entirely by the Foderal Reserve
cank of Minneapolis. The Board also paid a portion of the
11(3
r1st of preparing a film on the Federal Reserve System by
vicYcloPaedia Britannica Films, Inc., and assisted in reOfJ
the script for the film. This was a project of
reeYeloPaedia Britannical Inc. for which they assumed full
st81°40ibility, including distribution within the United
tori'es and foreign countries. The contribution by.the
.t1,!rcl of $17,750 was to assist in defraying a portion of
oF i
al 'out of pocket' costs of the actual filming
th, project.
am :The Board provides for reimbursement of the tuition
its Incidental expenses incurred by a limited number of
Gr..staff for attendance at the two-week course at the
tC School of Banking given at Rutgers University
ir the auspices of the American Bankers Association
c.nd it grants the necessary leave to the indivi-i for whom reimbursement is approved.
'We hope this information will be of some use to you
the
Study you are making."

Z




Approved unanimously.

,41111'

0001

Il

11 1 / AA
oecretary.