View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

A meeting of the Federal Reserve Board was held in Washington
on Thursday,
March 21, 1935, at 11:30 a. m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Governor
Thomas, Vice Governor
Hamlin
Miller
James
Szymczak

Mr. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
The minutes of the meeting of the Federal Reserve Board held
on March
14, 1935, were approved.
The Board then acted upon the following matters:
Telegrams dated March 20, 1935, from Mr. Austin, Chairman of
the Federal
Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, and Mr. Wood, Chairman of
the Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis, both advising that, at meetings
of the boards of directo
rs on that date, no changes were made in the
bankst
existing schedules of rates of discount and purchase.
Without objection, noted with approval.
Telegram to Mr. Curtiss, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank
Or

b

JJoston, reading as
follows:
"Your telegram March 20. Board approves for your bank
roll
-owing schedule of rates
on industrial advances effective
‘
lclaroh 22: Advances direct to industrial or commercial conrns 5i% to 6% per annum. Advances to financing institutions,
on portion for which institution is obligated and 3..% on
zemaining portion. Commitments to make advances i% to 1% per
Board notes with approval from your telegram that board
Of
directors of your benk, at its meeting on March 20, made no
Changes,
0
in your existing schedule of rates of discount and pur"ase other than establishment of rates referred to above."

j




Approved.

719
/2l/35
Memorandum dated March 18, 1955, from Mr. Goldenweiser,
krector of the Division of Research and Statistics, recommending that
Miss Lois A. Crim, who has
been employed temporarily as a stenographer
in that division since July 26, 1934, be given a
permanent status,
with no change
in her present salary at the rate of $1,440 per annum,
effective as of
the date upon which she passes a satisfactory physical
exa
mination.
Approved.
Memorandum dated March 16, 1935, from Mr. Goldenweiser,
1)ircetor of the Division of Research and
Statistics, stating that Mrs.
Ruth H. Porter has tendered her resiRnation as an employee in that
(47181-(3n, and recommending that, in view of her long service, she be
granted thirty days'
leave of absence with pay, and that her resigna—
tion be
accepted effective as of April 3, 1935.
Approved.
Memorandum dated March 19, 1935, from Mr. Morrill, reading as
tollows:

"Following the approval by the Board in 1933 of the
deposit of its funds with the Federal Reserve Bank of
.1 1chmond an arrangement was
made with the Federal Reserve
Bank of Cleveland for audits of the Board's accounts four
',I-race each year with irregular intervals by Mr. F. V.
174yson, Auditor of the Cleveland bank. The Board rein—
the bank for the traveling expenses of the auditors,
,
13-!-11e an allowance for each auditor of $5.00 per diem in
4-.,
11c11 of subsistence and $5.00 as additional compensation
each day spent in Washington. It is believed that Mr.
7aYeon'5 audits have been most thorough and constructive
arid all of his reports have been brought to the attention
of the
board.




718
3/21/35

-3-

"The arrangement with the Cleveland bank was for a
period of two years and will expire on June 30, 1935. While
it was thought, when the original arrangement was made, that
some system of rotation could be worked out under which
auditors of other Federal reserve banks which are relatively
near to Washington might be used, this is not considered
Practicable at the present time. However, it is understood
that the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland is willing to continue the present arrangement, and it is suggested that this
be authorized for another year. 'Mr. Smead has discussed this
subject informally with Mr. Walden of Richmond and Governor
Fleming of Cleveland and they indicated their concurrence
With this recommendation.
. "A memorandum dated March 16, 1935, from the Board's
Fiscal Agent, outlining briefly the procedure followed in
handling and checking the Board's accounts, is attached."
Approved.
Letter to Mr. Case, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, reading as follows:
"Under date of August 16, 1934, you were advised that
the Board approved the appointment of Mr. W. F. Sheehan
as
Chief Examiner and head of the force of examiners in the
field, with salary at the rate of Al2,000 per annum. This
Position was not provided for in the bank's personnel classification plan and a revised page covering the position was
later requested by the Division of Bank Operations. Advice
was Subsequently received over the telephone that
Mr. Sheehan's
.1,3°sItion was considered as 'official' and for this reason the
Boa
had not been furnished with a revised Form A page covering the position.
"It is noted that Mr. Sheehan's name is shown in the list
Of
officers for 1935 recently submitted by your bank and your
attention is directed
to the fact that the position of 'Chief
has not heretofore been regarded as an 'official'
=tron:
v. "In its letter X-3532 of October 5, 1922, the Board adlsed the Federal Reserve banks of the titles which, for comParativespurposes, it would regard as designating official
and this list has with one or two exceptions, been
11-2
,ll0wed
since that date. The exceptions are the positions of
m-!?nomistl and 'General Statistician' at your bank and certain
'
° 1fications in the titles of 'Auditor' and 'Counsel' such as




719
3/P1/35

-4-

"3eneral Auditor' and 'General Counsel'.
"Before deciding whether to classify the position of
Chief Examiner as an 'official' position, the Board feels
that it should obtain the viers of all Federal Reserve
banks on the ouestion of whether any changes should be
made in the list of titles which, for comparative purooscs,
have previously been regarded as designating official nositions. Accordingly, a copy of the inclosed letter has been
sent to each other Federal Reserve bank and it will be appreciated if you will also advise the Board of any changes
Which in the opinion of your directors should be made in
the list of titles contained in the Board's letter of
October 5, 1922, together with their reasons for such
changes."
Approved, together with a letter to the
Chairmen of the other Federal reserve banks,
reading as follows:
"In the Board's letter X-3532 of October 5, 1922, a
copy of - hich is attached, the Board advised the Federal
Reserve banks of the titles which, for comparative purposes,
it would regard
as designating official positions and this
list has, with one or two exceptions, been followed since
that date. The exceptions are the positions of 'Economist'
and 'General
Statistician' at one of the Reserve banks and
certain modifications in the titles of 'Auditor' and 'Counsel'
such as 'General Auditor' and 'General Counsel'.
"Recently, the Board was informally advised that the
directors
of one of the Federal Reserve banks feel that the
Position of 'Chief Examiner' ;n the Federal Reserve Agent's
department should also be classed as an official position.
"The Board appreciates the fact that the activities of
cidiMlyReserve banks have changed materially since 1922,
j
e
in the Federal Reserve Agent's department, and
consecuently It mc,y be desirable to revise the list of titles
which) for comparative purposes, have previously been regarded
as
desifmating official positions. Accordingly, it will be
appreciated if you
will advise the Board of any changes which
112 the opinion of
your directors should be made in the list
.?Ir titles
contained in the Board's letter of October 5, 1922,
-L°gether with their reasons for such changes."

t

Letter dated March 20, 1935, aryoroved by five members of the




Sailer, Deputy Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of

3/21/35

-5-

'Jew York, reading as follows:
"Mr. James has brought to the attention of the Board
your letter to him of .arch 15, requesting approval in
Principle of the practice followed by your bank since 1921
of extending the annual leave of employees under certain
conditions specified in your letter beyond the regular
vacation which -ould custolarily be granted by your bank.
"It appears that, during the recent examination of
your bank, Federal Reserve Examiner Drinnen called to your
attention certain cases which apparently came within the
purview of the Board's letter dated December 51 1932 (X-73)3),
-which requires that advance approval be obtained from the
Board. It appears also that such absences have arisen through
the policy of your bank of permitting employees to take additional leave in order to attend Citizens Military Training
Camps or National Guard Camps and of excusing employees with
full pay for not to exceed one week at the time of their
marriage. It appears further that in the case of absences
to attend earns not in excess of tvlo weeks' additional leave
has been granted to any emloyee.
"The Federal Reserve Board interposes no objection to
the policy followed by your bank in this connection, and will
not require that its advance approval be obtained in cases of
the kind described in your letter."
Approved.
Memorandum dated ?larch 14, 19351 from the Committee on Salaries
arld
ExPenditures, submitting a letter dated March 6 from Governor
Hamilton of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, advising that the
ehang" in the personnel classification plan of the ban': recommended in
1)ePut.7 Governor Helm',; letter of January 71 have been reconsidered in

the

light of
the Board's letter of January 51 19351 and requesting ap-

Droval

q7 the Board of certain changes now proposed to be made in the

Perso
nnel classification plan of the head office and its Denver branch.
The c
°rnmittee recommended, for the reasons stated in the memorandum,
that
such changes be approved with the exception of the title for the




I21
3/21/35
Position of "General Clerk" in the auditinr, department and the description of work
for the position of "assistant shipping teller" in the currencY and coin department, and with the suggestion to the bank that the
title for the Position of "General Clerk" be changed to "Supervisor",
and that the description of the duties of position of "Assistant ShipPing Teller" be chan7ed so as to more accurately reflect the euties of
such position.
Approved.
Letter to Governor Hamilton of the Federal Reserve Dank of
1Cansas city, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of February 25 requesting
information as to whether the Federal Reserve bank, instead of
Purchasing an additional annuity as authorized in the Board's
letter, X-90511 of December 26, 1954, may make direct contributions to a retired employee providing the total of such contributions is not in excess of the cost of the maximum additional
annuity authorized.
"Special direct contributions such as you describe would
represent in effect a life annuity of not to exceed a fixed
amount for apy one year or in the aggregate, payable to such
extent as the Federal Reserve bank might from time to time
consider desirable. It is not believed that benefits payable
t° retired employees should be subject to variation from time
to time at
the discretion of the Federal Reserve bank. There
cl°es not appear to be any advantage in the direct payment of
annuities in lieu of the Purchase of such annuities from the
Retirement System unless direct payment be confined to cases
ivthere the life expectancy of the annuitant was thought to be
-Less than normal. Such a selection of risks, if successfully
,
111ade, would, of course, be detrimental to the Retirement
°Ystem•
"If the Federal Reserve ban': desires to grant r. Greenhagen a
,
life annuity rather than a cash refund annuity, it may
so under the authority granted in the Board's letter X-9051,
°I December 26, 19FA, and it is understood that the cost of a
-Life annuity of 174.7 would be in the neighborhood of ''1,2001

-a




7°2
V21/35

-7-

"as compared with about 1,000 for a cash refund annuity of
like amount. In this connection it is understood that the
regular retirement allowance of 2.25.36 to which 1/r. Greenhagen is entitled includes an annuity of ;q2.24 provided by
ills own voluntary contributions. If so, the maximum cash
refund retirement allowance that could be granted Mr. Greenhagen under the authority given by the Board's December 26
letter would be 4412.24, rather than 'MOO as indicated in
Your letter."
Approved.
Letter to the board of directors of "The First State Bank of
Ton
ganoxie", Tonanoxie, Kansas, stating that, subject to the conditi°ns prescribed in the letter, the Board approves the bank's application for membership in the Federal Reserve System and for the appropriate amount of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
Approved.
Letter to the board of directors of the "McDonald. State Bank",
lIcrtll Platte, Nebraska, stating that, subject to the conditions prein the letter, the Board approves the bank's application for
membership

in the Federal Reserve System and for the appropriate amount

or stook
in the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
Approved.
Letter to Mr. Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve 13
ank of New York, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to 7.:r. Eillistin's letter of March 11,
E'transmitting therequest of the 'Union Trust Company of
Endicott, New York, for permission to retain in its
%sets 25 shares each of the stock of the Bankers Trust Company,
Y°rk, and the National City Bank, New York, which were pur,
uaseA by
the bank in February 193F, at a cost of 2,895.02 in




723
3/21/35

-8-

"apparent violation of membership condition numbered 3, which
reads as follows:
'Except after applying for and receiving the per—
mission of the Federal Reserve Board, you shall not
acquire an interest in any other bank or trust company
through the purchase of stock in such other bank or
trust company.'
"It is noted that the bank has stated that the additional
Shares which it has acquired and which it now requests permis—
sion to retain were purchased 'for the purpose of bettering
our Investment Account in these stocks.'
"The Board, as you know, feels that stocks are not suit—
able for the investment of funds of member banks, but, in view
of the small amount involved, will interpose no objection to
the retention by the Union Trust Company of Endicott, for the
time being, of the 25 shares each of the stock of the Bankers
Trust Company, New York, and the National City Bank, New York,
which were acquired in February 1933, and it is requested that
You advise the bank accordingly. It is requested also that you
remind the bank of the fact that under the provisions of Sec—
tion 9 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended by Section 5 (c)
of the Banking Act of 1933, approved June 16, 1933, State mem—
ber banks may not legally purchase stock of other corporations
after that date, except in the limited classes of cases in
Which national banks may lawfully do so."
Approved.
Letter dated March 20, 1935, approved by four members of the
to Mr. Austin, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
88-nk of

Philadelphia, reading as follows:

"This refers to your letter of March 6, 1935, and to the
Previous correspondence and discussions with representatives
,
iof The Real Estate—Land Title and Trust Company, Philadelphia,
t-ennsylvania, with regard to the proposed plan of transferring
the title
business of the trust company to a new corporation
to be
organized for that purpose.
in 1."It is understood that the trust company was incorporated
-Lu85 as a title insurance company and subsequently acquired
banking
and fiduciary powers. The trust company has stated
lat it wishes
to make such adjustments as may be necessary to
Take it eligible for admission to the Federal Reserve System,
including particularly the segregation of its title business




724
3/21/35

-9-

"in such manner as to terminate the transaction of this kind
of business by the trust company. Accordingly, the trust
company has asked the Board whether it would be considered
eligible for membership in the System if it should transfer
its title business, with adequate capital, to a new corporation which would be wholly owned by the trust company. The
Plan contemplates that the trust company, itself, would not
write any title insurance policies after the transfer of its
title business to the new corporation, which would reinsure
the trust company against loss on any outstanding policies.
The Board understands that the new corporation would conduct
°nlY a title business. The Board also understands that the
trust company feels that it would not be feasible to divorce
its title business entirely from the trust company
at this
time in view of the interest which the Reconstruction Finance
Corporation has in all of the assets
of the trust company
through its ownership of preferred stock in the institution.
"You state that you believe the proposed plan is sound
and that, if upon examination you find that the
condition of
the trust company is otherwise satisfacto
ry, you will be glad
to recommend it
for membership in the Federal Reserve System.
The Board of
Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia has recommended that the plan of segregating the title
business from the banking and trust business of The Real
Estate-Land Title and
Trust Company by the formation of a new
companY with title powers and the holding of stock of such
c°mParAY by the trust company be approved on the understanding
that the approval is limited to
the single step, and is appli.Fable to any
corporation in the same position and is not to
ae taken as an
agreement to approve any future application
I°r membership which would have to be determined upon the facts
then presented.
"The Board has given careful consideration to the matter
andyou
are requested to advise The Real Estate-Land Title and
.111st Company that on the basis of the facts described above,
the trust company is in an otherwise satisfactory condition,
it will
not be considered as ineligible or unacceptable for
Tembership in the Federal Reserve System if at the time of
,PPlication for membership it lawfully owns the stock of a
corporation which reinsures the trust company against
s on outstanding policies and engages solely in the title
surance
business. However, please also advise the trust
!
f mPan7 that the Board as a general policy does not look with
:
1 117
d?r on the practice of a member bank engaging in business
,
t IrectlY through a subsidiary which the bank is not permitted
'
engage in directly. If the trust company is admitted to

r




725
3/21/35

-10-

"membership, therefore, it is believed that it should dispose
of the stock in the proposed title company when
its relations
With the Reconstruction Finance Corporation so permit and the
distribution of the stock or other plan of disposal is justified by the capital position of the trust company.
It will
be expected that the bank, if admitt
ed to membership, will
use its best efforts to meet the Board's views
in the matter.
"You will understand that the Board's views on this matter are applicable only to the questi
on of the possible admission of the trust company to membership in the Federa
l Reserve
System and the Board has not attempted to pass upon what amendments to the State law, if any, should be enacted in order to
enable The Real Estate-Land Title and Trust Company to put the
Plan into effect nor to determine what position should be taken
on this question by the State authorities. You
are requested
to make the Board's position
on this point entirely clear to
the trust company.
"It is also understood, of course, that the opinion expressed in this letter refers only to the general plan as proposed, and that in all other respects the Board's action upon
an application for membership, if submitted, will be depend
ent
Upon the circumstances existing
at that time."
Approved.
Letter to Mr. Fletcher, Acting Federal Reserve Agent at the
l'ederal

Reserve Bank of Cleveland, reading as follows:

"Reference is made to Mr. Evans' letter of March 9, 1935,
With which was
inclosed copy of a resolution adopted by the
di rectors
of 'The Brewster Banking Company', Brewster, Ohio,
Whose application
for membership in the Federal Reserve System
!
ae approved by the Board on January 1P, 1935, subjec
t to cerconditions, to the effect that the bank would take no
action at this time toward accomp
lishing its membership.
Com "Accordingly, the application of The Brewster Banking
a Pa4Y for membership will be considered as having been with:
:
1 1M. The papers comprising the application will be retain
ed
'- a part of the permanent files of
the Board."
Approved.
Letter to Mr. Fletcher, Acting Federal Reserve Agent
at the
Pede
'
141 Reserve
Dank of Cleveland, reading as follows:




726
3/21/35

-11-

"Reference is made to Mr. Evans' letter of March 9,
1935, transmitting the request of 'The Ashland Bank and
Savings Company', Ashland, Ohio, for permission to invest
an amount not to exceed $40,000 in a building to be used
as banking quarters.
"In view of the recommendation of your office and the
fact that the investment of such an amount does not appear
to be unduly large or improper or otherwise violate the
Spirit or purpose of condition numbered 8, prescribed in
connection with the bank's application for membership, the
Board interposes no objection to such investment in an
amount not to exceed 40,000 and it is requested that you
advise the bank accordingly.
"It is suggested that you acquaint the bank with the
Board's views, which are known to your office, with respect
to making adequate provision for depreciation in banking
quarters owned."
Approved.
Letter to Mr. Wood, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal
Reserve Bank of
St. Louis, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of January 25, 1935,
regarding certain apparent violations of the conditions of
membership referred to in the report of examination of 'The
Louisville
Trust Company', Louisville, Kentucky, as of
October 6, 1934. It has been noted that, in view of the
in
terpretation given in the Board's letter of December 21,
19341 the
examination did not disclose a violation of conof membership numbered 7 and that the violation of
condition
numbered 22 has since been corrected through the
sale of its own
stock held indirectly by the bank.
"The examiner reported that, in apparent violation of
condition
of membership numbered 17, the trust department
of the bank had purchased $4,800 Louisville Trust Company
c
ollateral trust notes. The examiner stated that this
re presented the reinvestment of a liquidating dividend paid
the issue and was made to keep intact the original invest,Yt
el to provide for an annuity under a contract entered into
prior to the admission of the bank
to membership. You state
that the
apparent violation would seem to be an inconsequen-

r




I27
-12"tial matter and probably unavoidable. In the circumstances,
therefore, no action will be taken regarding the matter.
"Condition of membershin numbered 20 reads in part as
follows:
tFlich bank shall not directly or indirectly, through
ally device whatever, engage in the business of dealing in
real estate either for its orn account or as agent for
o+hers or of acting as agent for others in the renting of
real estate..../
"The examiner reports that 'although the real estate department of the bank is Primarily engaged in handling the real
estate owned by the bank or taken as security to mortgages or
held in various trust estates, the department
also acts as
agent for various individuals in the collecting of rents on a
commission basis. He also states that no new outside business
is taken and that the department is handling only each business
as it handled at the time of admission to membership and that
the management feels that the intent of the condition has not
been violated. In reply to your letter regarding the ratter,
the president
of the bank stated that the present income from
the rental business
is only 2,700 a year and that it is
necessary to maintain a rental organization to handle the
real estate which the bank manages in order to protect its
loans and assets and to handle certain real estate of trust
estates. The president also stated that the elimination of
the small
amount of this rental business would not reduce the
,77erhead in the real estate department and has asked that the
flic be permitted to retain present business. In transmitting
tne letter of the president of the bank, you recommend that
,he Board
amend condition of membership numbered 20 in order
uo permit the bank to continue to handle the rental accounts
which it had at the time or admission to membership.
"Condition of membership numbered 20 as prescribed was
not intended
to restrict the bank in handling its own real
lelstate or in such management of other properties as may be
4?cessary to protect its loans or in such real estate activi'les as are incidental to the exercise of its trust functions.
"In view of the information submitted, the Board will not
reg,,
n
rd the continuation of the rental accounts held by the
bank
Eiltorthe time advice
was received of approval of its application
membership
as constituting a violation of condition numbered
0.1,
Approved.
Letter to




r. O'Connor, Conntrolier of the Currency, reading

728
3/21/35

-13-

as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your memorandum of March 1,
1935, with reference to the proposed capital readjustment of
?The First National Bank of Wayne?, Wayne, Nebraska, Thich
was approved by the Board January 8, 1934, in accordance with
a plan which provided for a reduction in the common capital
stock from $75,000 to $25,000, the sale of $25,000 of preferred stock to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and
the use of the released capital, together with a voluntary
and unconditional contribution of at least $25,0001 to
eliminate a like amount of substandard assets.
"You advise that a communication received from Chief
Examiner Wright indicates that the $25,000 cash contribution
heretofore contemplated is impossible and it is understood
that in lieu thereof Mr. J. T. Bressler, Sr., Chairman of
the Board of Directors of the bank, has already executed,
and the bank accepted, a note and mortgage in the amount of
$15,323 in favor of the bank, and that loans in an equal
amount have been removed. It is noted that use of the
$50,000 released capital will enable the bank to eliminate
all doubtful assets, losses, and bond depreciation remaining
in the bank as shown by the report of examination as of FebrIlarY 21, 1955. Male the giving of the note to the bank by
Mr. Bressler may possibly involve a technical violation of
section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act, it appears that Mr.
?ressler is a very aged man, that he occupies no other position than Chairman of the Board of Directors, and is very
inactive in the affairs of the bank. Furthermore, it appears
that the obligation to the bank was incurred solely for its
benefit and that the transaction is not within the intent of
a lle statute. Accordingly, the Board will raise no objection
to the
transaction in question.
In accordance with your recommendation, the Board amends
its Previous approval to provide for the acceptance of the se?ilred note for $15,000 described in your memorandum, in lieu
I the cash contributi
on of $25,000 previously proposed, and
° Provide also that all assets eliminated by the use of the
?"'leased capital shall remain the property of the bank, with
e understanding that the other provisions of the plan as
inall7 approved remain unchanged; all as set forth in
Jour
suPplemental memorandum of March 1, 1955."

Z

r

Approved.
Letter to Mr. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading

Et8 follows.




729
3/21./35

-14-

"In accordance with your recommendation, the Federal Reserve Board approves a reduction in the common capital stock
of 'The First National Bank of Johnstone, Johnstown, Colorado,
from $50,000 to $25,000, in accordance 7ith a plan which provides that the released capital shall be used to eliminate
substandard assets in the amount of $20,0001 which are to
remain the property of the bank, and to increase the bank's
surplus account in the amount of 15,0001 all as set forth in
your memorandum of March 11, 1935.
"It is noted that the bank's capital was increased on
February 3, 1934, through the sale of $25,000 of preferred
stock to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and that the
plan of capital reduction does not contemplate any further
increase in the bank's capital at the present tine."
Approved.
Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury, reading as follows:
"In connection with a possible amendment to existing
statutes which would enable the Federal Reserve Board to obtain heat for
its new building from the Central Heating Plant,
4!1- ouestion has arisen as to what organization should be author'zed to furnish the heat. It is the Board's understandi
ng as
the result of
informal conversations with a representative of
Your department that jurisdiction of the Central Heating Plant
has been turned over to the National Park Service and that the
U
oie
alt=lgPark Service is the body charged with the duty of
the Plant and furnishing heat therefrom. It will be
5.Ippreciated if you will advise the Board whether this underStanding is correct."
Approved.
Letter to Mr. Strater, Secretary of the Federal Reserve Bank of
'Land, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of March 9 advising that
board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
its meeting on March 8 voted to authorize an expenditure of
/1?t to
exceed $50,000 for air-conditioning the third and eighth
tloors of the Federal reserve bank building and requesting advice
61.s to the
attttude of the Federal Reserve Board on the subject.
"The Federal Reserve Board will interpose no objection to




730
3/21/35

—15—

”an
expenditure of not to exceed l',50,000 for air—conditioning
the third and eighth floors of the Cleveland bank building,
and requests that if and when a contract is let for this
project advice be furnished the Board as to the contract price."
Approved.
Telegram dated !,arch POI 1935, approved by four members of the
Board) to Governor Calkins of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Fran—
cisco, reading as follows:
"Referring your March 12 wire, after discussing question
of committee to review procedure regarding destruction of old
records with Mr. Peyton, it is suggested thatcommittee con—
sisting of P operating men, two counsel, and one or two from
Agents' Departments be appointed. If you concur, please
notify Board of names of committee members appointed by you
and Board will suggest to Mr. Stevens, Chairman of Agents'
Conference, that he designate representatives of Agents'
Departments to serve on committee."
Approved.
Letter to Mr. Gidney, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent at the
Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of January 15, 1935, in which
You advise that the Banking Department of the State of New
York has requested you to make available to it copies of the
Federal Reserve Board's interpretations of section 19 of the
Federal Reserve Act as amended by section 11(b) of the Banking
!1-ot of 1953 and
rulings under that section and Regulation G.
YOU inclose a list
of a number of the Board's letters and tele—
gl'ams relating to this subject which you think would be of
interest to the Banking Department and state that if the Board
aloproves you will forward copies thereof to the Superintendent
of Banks of the State of New York.
"The Board has reviewed the schedule of letters which you
have submitted, and offers no objection to your furnishing to
the Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York the letters
referred to in the list which is inclosed herewith. This list,
You will
observe, omits a number of letters included in your
Schedule, the
substance of which has been published in the Federal




_ 731
3/21/35

-16-

Bulletin or is covered in other rulings contained
in the list. It also omits certain letters, the furnishing
Of which to the Banking Department at this time it is believed would serve no useful purpose. It is understood, in
accordance with your letter, that there will be deleted from
the copies of letters furnished to the Banking Department all
references to the X numbers of such letters, all names,
Whether of individuals or institutions, and in some instances
a sentence or paragraph of application only in the particular
case to which the letter relates, and further that you will
advise the Superintendent of Banks that the letters furnished
are for his confidential use and that in such use as is made
of the material therein contained no reference should be made
to the Federal Reserve Board or to the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York.
"The '-'ederal Reserve Board also has no objection to your
furnishing to the Superintendent of Banks of the State of New
York copies of X letters hereafter issued by the Federal Reserve Beard relating to the provisions of law or regulations
on the subject of the payment of interest on deposits by
member banks, in cases in which it appears that the subject
matter is of general interest to member banks and is not of a
confidential character. In all such cases it is understood
that deletions will be made from the letters as above mentioned, and that you will advise the Superintendent of Banks
that the material is for his confidential use and that in
ilsing the material furnished no reference is to be made to
rederal Reserve Board or to the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York."
Approved.
Letter to Mr. L. R. Collins, Cashier of The First National
13411k, Marietta, Georgia, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter dated March 6, 1935 regarding
the question whether The First National Bank, Marietta, Georgia
should pay interest to the estate of a savings depositor or to
the two sons of the deceased depositor after a transfer of part
of the father's savings account to the sons' savings accounts.
"It appears from your letter that a depositor of the bank
aving a savings account of approximately $10,000 died leaving
0 his two
sons $Z1250 each. You state that the sons also had
j eccunts in the bank and that the $3,n50 left to each son was
'
ransferred from the deceased father's account to the sons'
accounts.




732
3/21/35

-17-

"It is understood that you wish to know whether the
bank will he permitted to pay the two sons interest on the
account from the last interest period of their father's
account, or whether the bank can pay the father's estate
the interest up to the time of transfer and pay the sons
interest from the date of the transfer to their accounts.
"The question presented in your letter appears to be
one which involves an interpretation of the law of Georgia
relating to the administration of estates. Such a question
is not within the jurisdiction of the Federal Reserve Board,
and, accordingly, the Board feels it should not undertake to
express an opinion upon the matter.
"It is suggested that this question be referred to the
bank's counsel in order that his advice may be obtained."
Approved.
Letter to Mr. Clark, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent at the
Iledaral Reserve Bank of Atlanta, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to Mr. Newton's letter of December
17, 1934, and your letter of January 711 1935, relating to
the question whether The American National Bank of Nashville,
Nashville, Tennessee, is a holding company affiliate of The
First National Bank of Smithville, Smithville, Tennessee,
and The First National Bank of Springfield, Springfield,
Tennessee.
. "The Board understands that The First National Bank of
Smlthville has 300 shares of stock outstanding, of which The
American National Bank of Nashville owns 131 shares, and that
at the bank's 1935 annual meeting 282 shares, including those
"fled by The American National Bank of Nashville, were voted.
"The Board also understands that The First National Bank
°f Springfield has 500 shares of stock outstanding, of which
The American National Bank of Nashville owns 221 and possibly
controls an additional 10 shares registered in the name of
c'ne of its officers. It furthr-r understands that at the 1935
'nnual meeting of the bank's stockholders 485 shares, includ—
ing those owned by The American National Bank of Nashville,
were voted.
."The Board does not consider it necessary at this time
give further consideration to the question whether, on the
°asis of the 1934 annual meetings, a voting permit was neces—
s4i7 to authorize The American National Bank of Nashville to




733
3/21/35

-18-

"Vote its stock at the 1935 annual meetings. The Board is
of the opinion that on the basis of the above facts The
American National Bank of Nashville is not now a holding
company affiliate of either The First National Bank of
Smithville or The First National Bank of Springfield even
though the shares of stock owned and voted by it are not
considered in determining the total number of shares voted
at the 1935 annual meetings. You will note that this is
a departure from the Board's previous ruling concern
ing the
meaning of the words 'more than 50 per centum of the number
of shares voted for the election of directo
rs of any one
bank at the preceding election' appearing in section 2(c)(1)
of the Banking Act of 1933.
"It appears that The American National Bank of Nashville
desires that the Board give no further consideration to its
application for a voting permit and, in the absence of further word from you, the file will be closed."
Approved.
Letter to Mr. McAdams, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent at the
Federal Reserve Bank
of Kansas City, reading as follows:
"Consideration has been given to the information contained in your letter of March 9, 1935 regarding the ruestion whether the rclationships of Mr. E. P. Shove
with Shove,
Hager & Co., Inc., are such as to make section
of the
Banking Act of 1933 applicable to him in view of his service
as chairman of the board of directors
of The First National
sank of Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
"It appears from the copy of a letter from Mr. H. M.
Ragle, Secretary and Treasurer of Shove, Hager
& Co., Inc.,
dated March 6, 1935, and the copy of
a letter dated March 6,
1935 from the President of the national bank rhich you inclosed, that the corpora
tion is a comparatively small concern
17/11ch is being operated merely to furnish employm
ent to
several of Mr. Shove's and Mr. Hager's old employees and
which, between the date of its incorporation, August 24, 1934,
and December 31, 1934, receive commiss
d
ions from the purchase
and sale of securities for the account of customers of approximately !t2,300 and profits from transac
tions on its own account
in the
amount or slightly less than $1,000. It further appears
that Mr. Shove
is not an officer or director of the corporation;
t11118
..t he
is not active in the corporation's affairs and is not a
-61°°ritY stockholder in the corporation; and that he spends six
uLonths each year at his home
near Honolulu.




-734
3/21/35

-19-

"In the light of the information which has been submitted, it does not appear that Mr. Shove is 'an officer, director,
or manager' of the corporation within the meaning of
section 32
of the Banking Act of 1933. The Comptroller of the
Currency is
being advised of the Board's views as requested in the memorandum
from his office which was referred to in the Board's letter to
you of February 9, 1935."
Approved.
Letter to Mr. Curtiss, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston, readin
g as follows:
"Consideration has been given to the information submitted with your letter of February
14, 1935 in connection with
the possible applicability of sectio
n 32 of the Banking Act of
1933 to the service of Mr. Tilliam A. Hogan
as treasurer of the
Satucket Trust, Brockton, Massachusetts. This question arose
in connection with Mr. Hogan's Clayton Act applic
ation for a
permit to serve as a director of The Brockton Morris Plan
Company and The Brockton National Bank, both of Brockton,
Massach
usetts.
"As you stated in your letter, it appears that the Satuck
et
Trust is a small private investment trust compos
ed oftwenty-nine
members who are at present making monthly payments of
25.0011
and that its
activities consist in investing these monthly contributions and the accumulated income. It appears that the
Shares of the Trust are not sold to the public
and that the
Trust does not engage in underw
riting
distri
,
buting
or dealing
in securi
ties.
"It appears that the officers of the Trust serve
without
Fompensation, and thi_s fact,
as well as the size and nature of
organization l evidently explains the reluctance of Mr. Hogan
compile and furnish the detailed statistical information
!!sually required by the Board in connec
tion with such cases.
r
towever, it appears that gains and losses from the sales of
”curities during the years 1933 and 1934 approximately neu;tralized each other and that there were no
sales of securities
cY the
corporation from its portfolio during the year 1932.
4
, "On the basis of the information which has been submitted,
Board sees no reason to differ with your opinio
n and the inrmal opinion of your counsel that the Trust
is not an organizairn of the kind at which the provisions of section 32 of
the
tnking Act of 1933 were directed. There
would, therefore, appear
„,_) be no objection to your releas
ing to Mr. Hogan the Clayton Act
Permit Thich
was inclosed in the Board's letter to you of December

j




735
3/21/35

-20-

"26, 1934".
Approved.
Letter to Mr. Austin, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank
of Philadelphia, reading as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of March 151
1935, requesting a hearing on behalf of
James E. Gowen
C. Jared Ingersoll
George Stuart Patterson
Albert A. Jackson
in connection with their applications under the provisions
of the Clayton Act for permits to serve the Central-Penn
National Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
and other institutions.
"Please advise the above named applicants that the
Board has granted the reauest and has set Wednesda7, April
3) 1935, at 11 A. M., as the time for the hearing. Please
ask the applicants to advise you in case they will be unable
to attend at this time, and, if so, when they would be able
to attend.
"A copy of this letter is being sent to the Federal
R?serve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for
his information and files."
Approved.
Letters to applicants for Clayton Act permits advising re1813(

ively of the issuance or permits by the Board as follows:
Mr. W. R. McAlpin, to serve at the same time as an officer
of the
Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, New York, New
..,(3rk, and as a director of The Dunbar National Bank of New
-Lori- IT
1936 "ew York, New York, for the period ending Janumr14,
11r, Orestes A. Crowell, to serve at the same time as a director of The First National Bank of Stevens Point, Stevens
c2int, Wisconsin, and as a director and officer of the Portage
ulIntY Bank Almond, Wisconsin, for the period ending January
14) 1936.
Mr* H. C. Edmonds, to serve at the same time as a director




736
M2l/35

-21-

of The Terminal National Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois,
and as a director of the Personal Loan and Savings Bank,
Chicago, Illinois, for the period ending January 14, 1936.
Approved.
There were then presented the following applications for
changes in stock of Federal reserve banks:
A

lications for ADDITIONAL Stock:
l'Utrict No. 9
Stai;-134-17c—RThibbon,
Gibbon, Minnesota
aztriot No. 19
The 7`117
;i-RETTtlal Bank of Everett,
Everett,
Washington
Solano County
Bank,
, Fairfield, California
seirst State
Bank,
Richfield,
Idaho
Cashmere
Valley
Bank,
,
Cashmere, Washington
"Illers and Merchants Bank aC Rockford,
b Rockford,
Washington
a.ank of
Rosalie.,
tosalia, Washington
-Yolcane and
Eastern Trust Company,
SP°kane, Washington

I

Shares

2

2

36
2
2
3
1
9
450
Total

503
505

600

COO

54

54

A
for SURRFNDER of Stock:
o2
2
AU
4he
Marine Midland Trust
Company of New York,
New York, New
York

. Pr•s'j-1.'eE., _. _ti0/18"‘

,Istrict No. 4
Peoples National Bank of Rochester,
Rochester, Pennsylvania
strict No. 10
-e,First National
Bank of Hitchcock,
nitchcock., Oklahoma




Approved.

18
Total

_ 18
672




Thereupon the meeting adjourned.