View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

3

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Monday, March 19, 19')1.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

McCebe, Chairman
Szymczak
Vardaman
Powell
Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on March 16, 1951, were approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated March 14, 1951, from Mr. Young, Director of the
Division of Research and Statistics, recommending increases in the basic
411111-lea salaries of the following employees in that Division, effective
4Pril 1, 1951:

Racz
;08e Cor
nish
''411cY W.
are
Ware

Title
Clerk
Clerk-Typist
Clerk-Typist

Salary Increase
To
From $
$3,V75
2,850
:r3rO
T
2,690
2,610

Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated March 12, 1951, from Mr. Vest, General Counsel,
"
"ine that Miss Sara
A. Dyer, a clerk-stenographer in the Legal
1)131181°A) has submitted her application for retirement at the close of

this morith.

Noted.
Ot phi,

Letter to Mr. Whittier, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank

J-MelPhia,




reading as follows:

3/19/51

-2-

"This refers to your letter of January 11) 1951
enclosing three copies of an agreement covering special
retirement payments to President Williams duly executed
by you and President Williams, and requesting the Board's
approval thereof.
"Following our letter of December 12, 1949, a draft
of an agreement similar to the one enclosed with your
letter was submitted for clearance to the Bureau of
Internal Revenue, and although we have received a
favorable ruling on the question whether the agreement would affect the retirement system, we have not
yet received a ruling on the question as to how the
sums would be taxed to the recipient. Subject to the
Board's receiving a favorable ruling from the Bureau
of Internal Revenue on the pending tax question, the
Board approves the agreement submitted under date of
January 11, 1951. All copies of the agreement) however,
will be retained in the Board's files until we have
received a favorable ruling from the Bureau of
Internal Revenue, at which time we will execute and
return to you two copies of the agreement with Mr.
Williams."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Denmark, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
Of Atlanta, reading as follows:
"In accordance with the request contained in
Your letter of March 13) 1951, the Board approves
the
designation of Mr. T. H. Mobley as a special
examiner
for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Sproul, President of the Federal Reserve Bank
Of Nell
York

reading as follows:

1
, "This refers to Mr. Crosse's letter of March 1,
:61, transmitting a letter dated February 23, 1951,
!
!
1ldressed
to the Board by The Chase National Bank of
the City
of New York) describing plans to open a
p;t°Ifice of its Stuttgart, Germany, branch in the
.4ax-Kaserne In Ludwigsburg Germany.
,




3/19/51

-3-

"It is noted that the military authorities in
Germany have requested the establishment of such SubOffice to provide facilities for the United States
military and civilian personnel in the Flak-Kaserne
in Ludwigsburg, Germany; that such Sub -Office will be
merely a subsidiary operation of the Stuttgart Branch
to discharge its functions to the personnel served;
that the only transactions at the Sub-Office will
relate to accounts which are already on the books of
the Stuttgart Branch; that no accounts will be carried
and no loans made at such Sub-Office) and deposits
received there will be only for regular delivery to
the Stuttgart Branch; and the principal activity at
such Sub-Office will be the encashment of checks
and like instruments. As stated in Mr. Crosse's
letter, the proposal appears to be similar to two
Sub-Offices previously established in Germany by
The Chase National Bank, to which the Board interposed
no objection.
"Without indicating any opinion as to whether the
establishment of the Sub-Office referred to above constitutes the establishment of a branch requiring the
Board's permission, the Board will interpose no .
Objection at this time to the establishment and operaof the Sub-Office. If, however, it should appear
that such Sub-Office is to be a permanent office or
its operations should be extended beyond those stated
in the letter of The Chase National Bank of February 23,
1951, the Board would wish to give the matter further
consideration.
"It is suggested that your Bank advise The Chase
National Bank of
the Board's views in this matter and
l'equest The Chase National Bank to keep you informed
vith regard to the operations of the Sub -Office."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Diereks, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
144.4k
°f Chicago, reading as follows:
1
"Reference is made to your letter of February 2E,
N951, submitting the application of the State Bank of
fltPanee, Nappanee, Indiana, for permission to exercise
"IleiarY powers.




3/19/51
"In view of the Reserve Bank's recommendation
and the information submitted, the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System grants the applicant
Permission, under the provisions of its condition of
membership numbered 1, to exercise the fiduciary
Powers now or hereafter authorized under the terms
Of its charter and the laws of the State of Indiana.
"You are requested to advise the State Bank
of Nappanee, Nappanee, Indiana, of the Board's
action."
Approved unanimously.
Letter for the signature of the Chairman, to Honorable John
Sparkman/ Chairman, Select Committee on Small Business, United States
Se/late,

Washington, D. C., reading as follows:

"With your letter of March 10 you enclosed a copy
Of a petition referred to your Committee by Senator
James 0. Eastland and signed by citizens of Jackson,
Mississippi, requesting some relief from the provision
Of Regulation W -- Consumer Credit prohibitin
g the
acceptance of a trade-in as part or all of the required down payment in connection with the instalment
sale of appliances. The petition describes the proas unfair because the regulation permits a
trade-in
to be used as part or all of a down payment
14 connection with the instalment sale of automobiles.
"As you know the present requirements of the
'
l egulation in this respect have not been changed since
Itpe regulation of consumer credit was first promulgated
j_ the Board in 1941. For reasons that have seemed to
he Board to be compelling, the approach to the regula0/1 of automobile instalment credit has been and is
`afferent from the approach in the appliance and furniture
area
"In the case of automobiles the regulation depends
to
i„ a greater extent on the maximum maturity requirement
its restrictive effect than it does in the case of
nher consumer durable goods. This is regarded as a
e realistic approach because traditionally the large
ori?ritY of automobile sales involves the trading-in
he purchaser's old automobile; in many cases the

Z




119

3/19/51

-5-

"value assigned to this trade-in represents as much
as 50 per cent of the price of the new automobile
being purchased. In the case of appliances and other
listed articles the regulation has depended on its
down payment requirement for the greater part of its
restrictive effect. This approach also seems to be
the realistic one because the large majority of
appliances and furniture sales is made without
trade-ins; in the minority where trade-ins are involved the value assigned to them is very often a
token allowance. You will appreciate that in many
cases the trade-in allowance in connection with an
aPpliance sale is in fact a trade discount and
adopting the automobile trade-in ruling for all
appliances would tend to nullify the down payment
requirement of the regulation in the appliance field.
"The petition implies that the present requirements
Of Regulation W are likely to force 'Neill Bros....
a small independent appliance dealer' out of business.
Although the Board is very much interested that the
Provisions of Regulation W not be unduly restrictive
in individual cases it must also consider that the
regulation must strongly curb instalment credit as
a whole if it is to accomplish its purpose of helping
to restrain the serious inflationary forces in the
Present emergency period. The present terms of the
regulation are, of course, far from a prohibition of
instalment
credit.
"In this connection and as a matter of interest
there is enclosed a copy of a letter dated November 2
7,
3r:9501 on this same subject sent by the Board to another
oenator. The Board's staff is following closely the
effect of Regulation W not only on instalment credit
?utstanding
but on dealers and purchasers subject to
Its provisions.
"We are glad to have received the views of the
Jacir
Mississipp
i
i, citizens and I appreciate your
liteTeT-t n referring the petition to us."
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated March 13, 1951, from Mr. Sherman, Assistant
'
4 of the Board, recommending the destruction by incineration

the 48
.terial listed on an attachment to the




Approved unanimous