View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

411

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Thursday, March 13, 1952. The Board met
in executive session in the Board Room at 10:00 a m
..
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Szymczak
Evans
Mills
Robertson

At the conclusion of the executive session Mr. Carpenter,

Seereta,
and

Mr. Allen, Director of the Division of Personnel Adminis-

trat;_
4.un, were called into the meeting.
Consideration was given to a memorandum dated March b, 1952
the

Division of Personnel Administration in which it was stated

that
Robert N. Manatt, Assistant Federal Reserve Examiner, had
beela
called into the military service and that, since he had worked
the Board
for less than a year, he would be entitled under the
8°azdts
established policy to payment of something less than one month's
or

4417.

that
to

The memorandum recommended, for the reasons stated therein,
the B__ r
oa d approve the payment to Ir. Manatt of an amount equal

filll rionth
is salary, or $281j.lÔ.
After discussion, the recommendation was
approved unanimously with the understanding that
the Board would review its policy of giving
benefits to employees which other Government
departments and agencies are not authorized to
Provide, and that for the use of the Board in
that connection Mr. Allen would prepare a statement of special employee benefits that have
been approved by the Board.




3/13/52

-2Reference was then made to a memorandum dated March 41 1952

the Personnel Committee, recommending the appointment of Mr.
eclela Puckett, Dean of the College of Business Administration of the
UlltliersitY of Denver, as a Class C Director of the Federal Reserve
Ballac of Kansas City for the unexpired portion of the term ending
ilecember 31, 1953, to succeed Mr. Robert L. Mehornay, if it were ascertained that
Mr. Puckett would accept the appointment if tendered.

The

'1014orandum also recommended that Mr. Puckett be appointed Deputy Chair49110f the Bank for the remaining portion of the year 1952. The memo4111141 4.urther recommended that Mr. Aksel Nielson, President of the

Title

Guaranty Company of Denver, be appointed a Director of the Denver
Branms
for the unexpired portion of the two-year term ending December 31,
1953
1 60 succeed Mr. Puckett, if it were ascertained that Mr. Nielson
would
acceP'. the appointment if tendered.
The recommendations of the
Personnel Committee were approved
unanimously.
Before this meeting there had been distributed among the members
°t the Board a
memorandum dated February 21, 1952 from a staff committee
81thl11itting a plan for the creation of a centralized messenger servtee 4

the Division of Administrative Services to serve the Board's
Ntte
The proposed arrangement, adoption of which was recommended by
the
acnnel Conirnittee in a memorandum dated February 27, 1952,
'
el




M3/52

_3_

Contemplated that it would take effect as soon as the Division of
istrative Services, in cooperation with other divisions of the
8t4ff, was able to work out the details, and that at that time the
f°11."ing transfers of employees would be made:
Proposed Transfer of Following Messengers
to Division of Administrative Services
Name

gatrard L. Hargett
11041

H. Hanley
Venclq O.
Jeffries
./11111es Harvie Newton
Qamie Reed
4sse D.
Smith
A. Bates
aui Edward Hardy
.„1,1-:Lliam H. Drake

a.00ert Piper
?
1)ales V.
,."4-0-184a E. Carey
Pinn
".•

Thalley

Title
Messenger
Messenger
Messenger
Messenger
Messenger
Clerk—Messenger
Messenger
Messenger
Messenger
Messenger
Messenger
Messenger
Messenger

LLa
3,032
2,792
3,032
3,032

3,350
2,632
2,952
3,032
3,032
2,792
3,032
2,712

Present Division
Legal
Legal
Research & Statistics
Research & Statistics
Research & Statistics
Research & Statistics
International Finance
International Finance
Examinations
Examinations
Bank Operations
Bank Operations
Selective Credit Regulation

. Proposed Transfers Within
Division of Administrative Services

kr

-es 11. Norris
D. Rogers

Operator, Duplicating Devices
Messenger, Board Room
44Eua
Page
4
IlrarY ltertae
Page
O
Hughes
Page
be'absorbed
in Board's staff as vacancies occur

wotad
sotto

$3,660
3)230
2,500
2,500
2,500

In the discussion of the proposed plan it was stated that it
need close supervision at least in the initial stage, that while

adiustments in the centralized messenger force might be necessary




3/13/52
in

the light of experience and it would take some time to make the

lie/reYstem work with full efficiency, there was reason to believe that
it could be made to work satisfactorily with a savings in manpower.
The creation of the centralized messenger
force in the Division of Administrative Services and the transfer of employees, as above
set forth, were approved unanimously to become
effective as soon as the necessary details
could be worked out by the Division of Administrative Services. In taking this action it
was understood that such changes would be made
in the arrangement as were shown by experience
to be desirable.
Thereupon, Mr. Allen withdrew from the meeting and the followmembers of the staff entered the room:
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Mr.
Mi.

ketbe

Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Leonard, Director, Division of
Bank Operations
Vest, General Counsel
Young, Director, Division of
Research and Statistics
Youngdahl, Chief, Government Finance
Section, Division of Research and
Statistics
Leach, Economist, Division of Research
and Statistics

Thomas presented a report of developments in the Government

ties market and recent changes in loans and deposits of reporting
11 banks, which was followed by a brief discussion.




3/13152

-5At this point all of the members of the staff with the excep-

tion of Messrs. Carpenter and Sherman withdrew, and the action stated
vith

respect to each of the matters hereinafter referred to was taken

blithe Board:
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
4deral Reserve System on March 12, 1952, were approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated February 15, 1952, from Mr. Young,
Director, Division of Research and Statistics, recommending
that
David L. Grove, Chief, Latin American Section, Division
(ItIllternational Finance, be transferred to the Division of
Research and Statistics as Economist, with no change in his
Preeatt basic salary of $9,800 per annum, effective as of the
Ute
-Pon which he enters upon the performance of his new duties.
Ilesleincrandum also stated that the Division of International Finance

vaa

-greeable to this transfer.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated March 7, 19520 from Mr. Marget, Director,
n of International Finance, recommending the appointment of
4ar1 Houser as Chief, Latin American Section, in that Division,

04
ate

mporary indefinite basis, with basic salary at the rate of
koor
,
Per annum, effective as of the date upon which he enters upon




41c;

3113/52

-6-

the performance of his duties after having passed the usual physical
examination and subject to the completion of a satisfactory employment

investigation.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated March 11, 1952, from Mr. Bethea, Director,

Division of Administrative Services, recommending the appointment
r Shirley S. Corbin as Charwoman in that Division, on a temporary
balls for a period of two months, with basic salary at the rate of
$21420 per
annum, effective as of the date upon which she enters
11P°11 the performance of her duties after having passed the usual
PhOlical examination and subject to the completion of a satisfactory
elliPloyment investigation.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated March 5, 1952, from Mr. Marget, Director,
of International Finance, recommending the appointment of

Ives IR_
'
4roni as Economist in that Division, on a temporary indefilaite
baais, with basic salary at the rate of $7,040 per annum,
etreeti
-ve as of the date upon which he enters upon the performance
duties after having passed the usual physical examination
141ellbiect to the completion of a satisfactory employment
1411atigati0n.




Approved, Mr. Robertson
not voting.

"

3/13/52

-7Letter to Mr. Watson, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank

Of Richmond, reading as follows:
"In the light of the circumstances described in
Your letter of March 11, 1952, the Board of Governors
approves the payment of a special differential, in
addition to base salary, of $480 per annum to the
supervisory personnel of the Night Transit Force and
a special differential, in addition to base salary,
of $360 per annum to all other employees on this force."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Patterson, Vice President and General Counsel,
?eclel'al Reserve Bank of Atlanta, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letters of February 20 and
cps 1952, with respect to the question whether the
rtablishment of a branch by the Metairie Savings
ank & Trust Company, Metairie, Louisiana, about one
lid one-half miles from its present location in
5ferson Parish, a suburban section of New Orleans,
outside the city limits, would affect its eligibility for membership in the Federal Reserve System.
"The answer to your question depends upon an
int
erpretation of section 5155 of the Revised Statutes
Z! the United States as applied to State member banks
section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act. Under this
:4atute a State member bank in Louisiana may not es.11!blish a branch loutside of the city, town, or vil4-ne in which it is situated unless it has a paid-in
Itrid unimpaired capital stock of not less than $500,000.1
:
13 the Metairie Savings Bank&Trust Company has capiZal stock of $252,2251 as shown by its statement of
2ndition of December 31, 1951, it could not qualify
'
cTcler this provision of law if the branch is located
,utside of the city, town, or village in which the bank
4-8 Situated.




411

3/13/52

-8-

"It is understood that the Metairie Savings Bank
gc.Trust Company and the proposed branch will be located
Inthin the same unincorporated area of Jefferson Parish,
and that, from personal inspection, you are of the
opinion that the place of the bank and the place at
which it wishes to establish the branch lie in one and
the same community. This view seems to be supported
by the maps enclosed with your letter. In the light
of this information, the Board is of the opinion that
the $500,000 capital requirement would not be applicable to the establishment of this particular branch
and that, therefore, the establishing of such branch
would not affect the bank's eligibility for member„71111). However, the adequacy of the bank's capital
'las not been considered and would, of course, be
l'eviewed should the bank apply for membership in the
Federal Reserve System.”
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Millard, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank
Of
'all

Francisco, reading as follows:

"This refers to your letter of February 29s
D952, concerning the classification for purposes of
"egulation X.of a loan with respect to a parcel of
r?al property on which there is a residence conelructed before August 3, 1950, and a nonresidential
at
°re building which is new construction under the
regulation. You state that it is your Bank's undertha!
the respective values of the two struc'
11res are approximately equal and that their location
Z11. the property is such that the possibility of separai°n in the case of resale would be remote and unlikely.
"In accordance with the applicable principles
4.
8
44ted in the Board's letter of March 6, 1951, S-1276
735), we agree with you that the entire property
:
0
'
h °11.1d be considered 'real property on which there is
-" construction.? The question is whether subsequent




3/13/52

—9—

"financing with respect to the property should be
treated as (1) residential credit, (2) nonresidential
credit, or (3) a mixed purpose loan.
"IYa perhaps will recall referring a similar
question to the Board with your letter of August 23,
1951. In accordance with the principles stated in the
Board Ts reply of September 11, 1951, subsequent financing
With rcspect to the property should be treated as an
extension of credit for mixed purposes. An appropriate
Portion of the land value should be allocated to each
structure in determining the maximum loan value of each
P°rtion of the mixed purpose credit extension."




Approved unanimously.