View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

327
A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
was held in Washington on Friday, March 1, 1946, at 9:30 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Ransom, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
McKee
Draper
Evans

Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Connell, General Assistant,
Office of the Secretary
Mr. Morrill, Special Adviser
Mr. Thurston, Assistant to the Chairman
The action stated with respect to each of the matters hereinreferred to was taken by the Board:
The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federa.
Reserve System held on February 28, 1946, were approved unanimously.
The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Governors of the Fed'
141
-serve System with the Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks
4140
/I February 28, 1946, were approved unanimously.
Today Mr. Ransom received a telephone call from the Clerk of
t4110
,
'se Judiciary Committee inviting him to appear Monday morning,

h4 ,
) 3-946, before a subcommittee to consider a further extension
or
the Second
War Powers Act.

Governor Ransom was unable to go be-

of a
Previous appointment and suggested that the Board request
Vest to
appear before the Committee and to offer for the record

the n

ote

memorandum (with appropriate changes to bring it up to date)

, the l'easons supporting the request that Title IV of the Second War
rwera
Act be extended, as was submitted on behalf of the Board to the
J'Ildtet
ar7 Committee of the Senate when it was considering the same




328
3/1/46

-2—

silbieet in December of last year. The statement referred to by Mr.
Rati
scel was approved by the Board at a meeting on November 1, 1945, and
WaR
- Sent

to Mr. Snyder, Director of the Office of War Mobilization and

Ilec°417ers10n, with a letter of the same date.
The procedure suggested by Mr. Ransom
was approved unanimously.
Telegrams to Messrs. Flanders and McLarin, Presidents of the
?ecier
al Reserve Banks of Boston and Atlanta, respectively, Mr. Strathy,
4r1 St-n
-wart, and Mr. Mangels, Secretaries of the Federal Reserve Banks
or
chill°11d, St. Louis, and San Francisco, respectively, Mr. Powell,
Ptrat v-ice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Mr.
414
ell, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City
—41 Mr- Coleman, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of
11411a
'
s et—lting that the Board approves the establishment without
chatige
by the
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston on February 25, by the
al Reserve Bank of San Francisco on February 26, by the Federal
408e1,11.
e Banks of Atlanta and St. Louis on February 27, and by the Fed—
R
N4,
4

eeerve Banks of Richmond, Minneapolis, Kansas City, and Dallas on

e4'117. 28, 1946, of the rates of discount and purchase in their exist—

Approved unanimously.
Me
morandum dated February 26, 1946, from Mr. Paulger, Director
of' the ry
Iltkh

lvision of Examinations, submitting the resignation of Edwin J.
soti,
'Issistant Federal Reserve Examiner, and recommending that the




311/46

—3—

l'esigaation be accepted
as of the close of business February 17, 1946,
allcithat a lump sum payment be made for the annual leave remaining to
his
credit at that time.
The resignation was accepted as
recommended.
Memorandum dated February 25, 1946, from Mr. Bethea, Director
q the ni
--Lviion of Administrative Services, recommending that the
teblo
l'arY appointment of Mrs. Rose Lee Williams, cafeteria helper in
that t
ivision, be extended for a period of two months without change

he

r present
salary of $1,440 per annum, effective March 1, 1946.
T4 41.
171°randum stated that it is not contemplated that Mrs. Williams
'
c
become a member of the Retirement System during her temporary
allPqntraent.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Congressman Herman P. Eberharter reading as follows:

r4.
ela "This is in reply to your letter of February 6, 1946,
vIng to the Board's Regulation W.
The main contention of this letter, as it seems to
that in present circumstances the regulation of
a;:usumer credit serves no anti-inflationary purpose. We
aoe unable to agree with that contention, feeling as we
rile that President Truman put the matter correctly in his
crseage on the State of the Union, submitted to the Conase88 under date of January 14, 1946, which reads in part
follows:

118
cr2

'Even with maximum encouragement of production,
cannot hope to remove scarcities within a short
iime. The most serious deficiencies will persist
-La the fields of residential housing, building materisa _,
3 and consumers' durable goods. The critical situation makes continued rent control, price




3/1/46

—4—

"Control, and priorities, allocations, and inventory controls absolutely essential. Continued
control of consumer credit will help to reduce,
the ressure on 'rices of durable _oods and will
also •rolon the eriod durin_ which the backlo
demand will be effective.' Italics supplied.
"The logic of this position seems to us to be unassailable. It stands to reason that upward pressure on the
Prices of consumers' durable goods that is now being exerted by excessive demand, in relation to inadequate sup,
1,
24lies, will be lessened by dampening that demand. We do
Ilat see how
anyone can deny that Regulation W is one of
'he measures which help to dampen the demand for consumers'
durable goods and thereby contributes to the Government's
general stabilization program.
th"We are also unable to agree with your statement
at RegulationW has no effect on prices since prices are
c°ntrolled by the Office of Price Administration, nor with
asur contention that the administration of price ceilings
not been influenced by the existence of Regulation W.
Price ceilings are dikes keeping the flood of purchasing
irailter from creating havoc
in the economic system by bidg UP prices, but like all dikes they are strong enough
° stand only in case the pressure of the flood is not too
ra?-t. The part which Regulation W plays in the antiprogram is to keep consumer credit from adding
knclulY to the flood of purchasing power. The OPA, as you
,
1 12:63 is represented on the Consultative Committee with
L:Lch the Board is required to consult in administering
prgulation W, and OPA's own view on the subject is well ex19ed in, a press release issued by that agency on May 7,
44) which reads in part as follows:
'In the present emergency, buying power,
already far in excess of goods available for purchase, should not be increased by the unnecessary
Use of credit. Cash and credit alike are means of
Purchasing goods. An important difference is that
Use of credit greatly increases the amount of goods
a person can buy at any one time, multiplying purchasing power by concentrating future earnings on
Present purchases. It is practically the same
whether the merchant extends the credit to his
customer or the customer borrows cash with which
t° pay. It is clear, therefore, that credit plays
a formidable part in creating the pressures sought

V

ii




-5"to be held in check by price ceilings, rationing,
and other factors in the President's program.'
"We have not overlooked thereerences in your letter
to the special problems of individual returning veterans.
The Board is mindful of these special problems, but has
seen as yet
no reason to depart from the view that for the
great mass of returning veterans the vital thing is that
the Government, with the cooperation of the public, should
elleceed in its fight against inflation and the spiraling
coat of living. The proposal that all veterans should be
exempted from the regulation would seem to the Board to be
!
i 104g step in the direction of nullifying the regulation
'50re any such action is justified. A secondary but still
!
lgnificant consideration is that it would not be to the
Interest
of the individual veteran to make it possible for
Z;Illers to load him down with goods at wartime prices under
e lure of easier credit terms.
"As your letter indicates, you are well aware, as we
are Y
that no single measure is adequate to coping with the
115 danger of inflation which confronts the country at
the ,present
Present time. A coordinated set of policies is needed,
appropriate wage-price policies as well as fiscal
monetary measures. It is the earnest desire of the
as well as its legal obligation, to see that concredit regulation is administered in the light of
21e controlling consideration. While this means that in
resent
circumstances consumer credit regulation should be
1931. the
stern side, it means also that as time goes on and
ns°cluotion increases such regulation will sooner or later
be liberalized. It is our belief that the Board
its Consultative Committee will be on the alert to recj
,
tlize when that time has come and to take such action as
"4-1-1 then be in
order."
Approved unanimously.
Letter
Of

phiaa

to Mr. Williams, President of the Federal Reserve Bank

clelPhia, reading as follows:
aries "The Board of Governors approves the payment of salWhich to the following officers at the rates indicated,
are the rates fixed by your Board of Directors, as
Ported in your letter of February 23, 1946.




332
3/1/46

-6-

"For the period March 1, 1946, to April 30, 1947,
inclusive:
W. J. Davis, First Vice President
$17,000
Wm. G. McCreedy, Vice President
12,000
and Secretary
"For the period May 1, 1946, to April 30, 1947,
inclusive:
C. A. Sienkiewicz, Vice President
$16,000"
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Wiltse, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
4111cof Mew
York, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of February 19,
1;946, submitting the request of the Bank of Jamestown,
.
u amestown, New York, for permission to establish a branch
In
Sherman, New York.
"In view of your recommendatilin, the Board of Goverriors approves the establishment and operation of a
1,
u,
r
.
j
in Sherman, New York, by the Bank of Jamestown,
me stown, New York.
It is understood that Counsel for
tr Reserve Bank will review and satisfy himself as to
ue legality of all steps taken to establish the branch."

j

Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Rounds, First Vice President of the Federal Reserve t
exlk of New. York, reading as follows:
to t "In your letter of January 29, 1946, you refer
he
Com,, application for membership submitted by the Trust
,
e-vaxlY of New Jersey, Jersey City, New Jersey, and sugIlost that a discussion be had with representatives of the
130c?netruction Finance Corporation regarding the capital
0081tion of the Trust Company and the possibility of the
pr:?.°r
a
tion accepting a settlement for its holdings of
Butterred stock on the basis of the present value of
en
holdings.
been "A discussion in line with your suggestion has
dew,held, in which Governor McKee participated. It was
awe. -Loped that the management of the Corporation is
or 71,:e of the situation with respect to the Trust Company
"ew Jersey as well as with several other institutions
similar circumstances. However, the experience of the




3:3
3/1/46

-7-

"Corporation has been very good with respect to a
number of situations which, at times, were comparable
t° that of the Trust Company. Because of this fact
and because of the numerous cases in which the same or
fiTilar circumstances exist, the Corporation is not at
°I18 time disposed to enter into any negotiations with
8
4:,view to sale of its holdings of preferred stock of
"le Trust Company at less than the amount of its investZent• n
Approved unanimously.

Letter to the Board of Directors of the "Citizens State Bank,"
4 Bcw, Oklahoma, stating that, subject to conditions of member411,
.
numbered 1 to
3 contained in the Board's Regulation H, the
kart'
approves the bank's application for membership in the Federal

've SYstem and for the appropriate amount of stock in the Federal.
-serve Bank of Dallas.
Approved unanimously for transmission
through the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

ApDrov




Chairman.