The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
1686 A meeting of the Executive Committee of the Federal Reserve 13°srd was held in Washington on Friday, June 8, 1934, at 5:30 p. m. PRESENTS Mr. Black, Governor Mr. Hamlin Mi. Szymozak Mi. Mr. Mr. Mr. The Morrill, Secretary Bethea, Assistant Secretary Carpenter, Assistant Secretary Martin, Assistant to the Governor Committee considered and acted upon the following matters: Letter dated June 7, 1934, from Mr. Sproul, Secretary of the Pederea Reserve Banic of New York, and telegrams dated June 7, 1934, *cm Sargent, Secretary of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Fran- ci8"1 44d June 8, 1934, from Mr. Strater, Secretary of the Federal 14"e Bank of Cleveland, and Mr. Clark, Secretary of the Federal Rellerlre Bank of Atlanta, all advising that, at meetings of the boards Of dir e--°rs on the dates stated, no changes were made in the banks' g schedules of rates of discount and purchase. Without objections noted with approval. Memorandum dated Juno 5, 1934, from Mr. Smead, Chief of the bilrision of Bank Operations, recommending the appointment of Mr. klliem n• Wallace as a file clerk in the division, with salary at the rate of $1,500 per annum, effective June 8, 1934, subject to his Psasing a satisfactory Physical examination, the recommendation was al)Proved by five members of the Board on June 7, 1934. Approved. the lismoorandum dated June 7, 1934, from Mr. Paulger, Chief of Divisi o Of Examinations, recommending the appointment, for a 16E37 f! 6/8/34 period of thirty days, of Miss Beverly Mathews as a stenographer in the D ivision of Examinations, with salary at the rate of $4.50 a day fer each working day, effective as of the date upon which she enters 11P°21tbe performance of her duties. Approved. Memorandum dated June 7, 1904, from Mr. Paulger, Chief of the 1111444°4 of Examinations, recommending that the headquarters of Mr. G. Re „ ' Ilrff, an assistant Federal reserve examiner, be changed from D41148, Texas, to El Paso, Texas, effective June 7, 1904. Approved. 14morandum dated May 28, 1934, from the Committee an Salaries 4" kPelldittIreas or stating that, in accordance with the Board's letter December 2, 1933 (13-934), the Federal reserve banks had submitted at'xtements showing the name and annual salary of each employee on Jan y 1, 1934, together with the salary on January 1 of last year Or the ial salary if hired after January 1, 1933; that these eitateatents have been checked against the personnel classification 11448 °4 file with the Board; and that it is recommended that all Federal reserve bani, except Minneapolis, be advised that the salaries "exPllyees on January 1, 1934, as sham in the lists furnished the 13 4 d, have been noted with approval, and that the Federal Reserve Or kinneapolis be advised that the salaries of employees of the bank 04 January 1, ave eon noted with approval with the excep- or the salaries of four employees, -"ri ik 1i 6/8/34 3alary ran (Form A Salary on Jan. 1 1933 1934 John At Carlander Lysen Perrian Olstad Examiner, Bank Dam. Dept. Manager, Accounting Dept. Eanager, Auditing Dept. Equipment Mechanic, General Service Dept. 3600-%'?4500 $2400 3300- 3600 3500 3300- 3600 3500 Special3000 appvd. 3000 by Board 34200 4000 3800 3100 action on which is being deferred pending the receipt of additional infor mation. The memorandum also stated that in checking the salary 14t3 s ubmitted by the banks against the personnel classification plans °little with the Board, a number of differences were noted of a more Or less technical nature, and that the banks are being asked for exP14114tiens of these differences in the proposed letters attached to the inemorandunis Letters to the chairmen of the various Federal reserve banics, su bmitted by the Comnittee on Salaries and Expenditures with it3Insmorandum, were approved by five members of the Board on June 7, 1934. Approved. Letter to 4rd, to, dated Juno 7, 1934, approved by four members of the r4r. LoClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve 134 nk Of Ralun -Ioz ty, readily; as follows: ecelPt is acknowled-ed of your letter of May 29, t°c'eth 1934, th; ;. t er with its inclosures, stating that you do not find that e °8`rd has ever been requested to approve the appoinLment as azii71-"er of 11i'1. C. W. Trost, whose appointment as assistant exhe honr 1,7" aPProved by the :board on Novamber 22, 1022, but that , 1 01304:lad the status of an examiner and has signed examination thie. t? 43 such for a number of years. You ask the approval at tt4o a-me itirof the appointment of Liz. Trost as an examiner, and reTaest the approval of the appointment as assistant examIL? t L- Donovan, an employee of the bank who had preen approved by the Board to assist in e7Aminations of G/8/34 -4- "member banks . "The Federal Reserve Board approves the appointment of Lr. Trost as examiner and Li.. H. E. Donovan as assistant examiner in the Federal reserve agent's department of your bank, salary rates of ; , respectively. e3,096 and annum, 02,556 per It ls requested, however, that in the future, proposed promoOns to examiner of any assistant examiner or appointments as e_xaminer or assistant examiner on a permanent basis of any perL6on.who had previously been designated as such on a temporary aslE be submitted to the Federal Reserve Board before becoming effective." Approved. Letter to the board of directors of "The Citizens Bank of 1,:adicoe ladison, Chic, stating that, subject to the conditions preaeribe. • cl 14 the letter, the Loard approves the bank's application for flOcri Lip ln the Federal Reserve System and for the appropriate amount se steel_ . 111 the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Approved. Lettes. , A Gazed June 6, 1934, approved by five meirbers of the to ijr "ood, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank St. Le,. ' 418 1 reading as follows: The Ln Y?u have inquired whether the report of examination of _ her la ouisville Trust Company, Louisville, Kentucky, as of c o (11ce`j, 1933, made by an examiner for the Federal Deposit Insurion ,t1t t: a L;nd on the basis of which the bank's applies.-ebruo in the Federal Reserve System was approved peder -rY 19, 1934, can serve as a basis for certification to the - Deposit Insurance Corporation. cont .in view of the circumstances in this case and the comments th lnie(..1 in your letter of January 12, 1934, regarding the thro_, er°11"ecs 1 of the examination, the Board is of the opinion ly-;4110 1 report of exmmination as of October 6, 1933 may properIlicur Ve at3 the basis for certification to the Federal Deposit to 14:Ise Corporation prior to July 1, 1934, in case you desire s Your r ecomxtendation on the basis of such report." t V Approved. ) (1 6/8/34 -5Telegram dated June 7, 1934, approved by five members of the Board., to Mr. ewton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Balik of San Francisco, reading as follows: "Re Sargent's wire June 1, 1934 advising that State SecuritY bank, Brigham, Utah, has not reduced the par value of its stock from a00,000 to .,:,50,000, board's letter of May 28, 1934 ,1vas based upon the certified statement of the cashier of the lTnk I that its books showed a reduction of .;;50,000 in capital ' .st ock in connection with the issuance of a like amount of capi,E1.t1 debentures. Board confirms Sargent's views that the quesl.u 0n of removing common capital impairment by reduction or 'sessment is a separate one from that of correctly reporting :EIrtpital accounts in statements of condition. Board feels, how' r that even when correctly reported capital inpairments 1.1(3111d be adjusted as soon as practicable." Approved. Letter to "The National aster County Bank of Kingston", New York, readinw as follows: i"The Federal Reserve Board approvos your application for I llssion to act, when not in contravention of State or local as trustee, executor, administrator, registrar of stocks ! nd4, guardian of estaOf At tes, assignee, receiver, committee wh.-s idates of lunatics, or in Lily other fiduciary capacity in colch State bk5, trust companies or other corporations which 14: int° competition with national banks are permitted to act r the laws of the State of New York, the exercise of all right1 . 7 1 0 11gect to the provisions of the Federal ReAct :lartl: r„ lations of the Federal Reserve Loard. powe inis letter will be your authority to exercise fiduciary aut, rs RS set forth above. A formal certificate covering such "Tizatien will be forwarded to you in due course. 4 , 3t,t131° ITI ci feels that, if you are tendered any of the the National Ulster County Bank and Trust 8crutj;°f ston, Kingston, New York, you should carefully - 26 their ' condition and should not accept any of such ,!,17hich, through their assumption, may be detrimental to theat 4.erents of your institution." '0“r;) LO•teti s Approved. Letter to the "South Side National Bank in St. Louis", St. Ltissouri, reading as follows: 1691 6/8/34 -6"The Federal Reserve Board approves your application for Permission to act, when not in contravention of State or local /, as trustee, executor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of estates, assignee, receiver, committee of estates of lunatics, or in any other fiduciary capacity in which State banks, trust companies or other corporations which come into competition with national banks are permitted to act under the laws of the State of Lissouri, the exercise of all uch rights to be subject to the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and the regulations of the Federal Reserve Board. "ihis letter will be your authority to exercise the fiduciary Powers as set forth above. A formal certificate covering such a uthorization will be forwarded to you in due course." Approved. Letter to idr. John Luft, Cashier of The luxedo National Bank, 111xede, Lew York, reading as follows: ,. is refers to the resolution adopted by the Board of_i rectors of The Tuxedo National Bank, signifying the bank's desire ,0 A wnioh havesurrender its right to exercise the trust powers been granted to it by the Federal Reserve Board. "The, Board Tuxed, understands that The Tx uedo liational Bank: i,,,7:' l'ew York, has been discharged or otherwise properly rel e - v eu in accordance with the lm of all of its duties as fidut-111:Y. The Board, therefore, has issued a formal certificate alc3a. ; 1, 1 he luxedo National Bank certifying that it is no longer the .orized to exercise any of the fiduciary powers covered by Thi Prosions of Section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve Act. st e rtificate is inclosed herewith. n thic c your attention Leaned to the fact hat, under the provisions of ,Section 11(k) of the Federal Reser e Ar.4. bY Z1'e-', as amended, when such a certificate has been issued tlhall Pederal Reserve Board to a national bank, such bank (1) fe,s,(hen%Icl:Igbe subject to the provisions of Section 11(k) Reserve .Act or the regulations of the Federal haver've,Beard made pursuant thereto, (2) shall be entitled to th.[e-curned to it any securities which it may have deposited Private LtDte or similar authorities for the protection of Power? or court cept trusts, and (3) shall not exorcise any of the covered by Section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve Act exwith the Permission of the Federal Reserve Board." IJ Approved. l'etter to Lr. alliams, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal 1602 6/8/34 -7Reserve Bank of Cleveland, rending as folloIrs: "This refers to your letter of October 19, 1933, requesting advice whether a national bank in the State of Pennsylvania, which had received permission from the Federal Reserve Board to exercise in that trust powers prior to the passage of new legislation State requiring an increased capital and surplus for a competing State institution, is compelled to meet the require' s of the State law in order that it may continue to exercise such powers. In this connection, it is understood that Sections ' 101 and 413 of the Pennsylvania Bnrking and Building Loan Code of 1033, which bee effective as of July 1, 1033, provide for Z;tisl111111-1111capital and surplus for organizing State banks and companies in excess of previous requirements and that Secticns 402 and 414 require State banks and trust companies incorporated prior to July 1, 1933, to increase their capital and surplets by one of several methods described therein. 8 lexnatril Or to September 26, 1918, the effective date of an ii to Section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve Act, the Federe- Reserve Loard was authorized To grant by special permit to national banks applying therefor, when not in contravention of State or local law, the r o t eolyet as trustee, executor, administrator, or registrar dand bonds under such rules and regulations as the sa S0 id may prescribe'. add ,n() enftt : cy T17p26, 1918, Section 11(k) was amended so as to rovision: no permit shall be issued to any national banking assoon having a capital and surplus less than the capital :nu surplus required by State law of State Banks, trust comv Tes, and corporatiolis exercising such powers'. The Board has heretofore taken the position that the reZtement contained in the amendment of September 26, 1918, and 0110, per is applicable only at the time of the granting of not r-"to a national bank to exercise trust powers and does a aa4guire a subsequent increase in the capital and surplus of u, powetr t °nal bank which has been granted permission to exercise /latiela " r 'the Board, therefore, has consistently ruled that 1916 h-: , - uanks which prior to the amendment of September 26, lest; t' a tt 4 been granted trust powers with a capital and surplus .ell a i ctt'13su:zpital and surplus required of State institutions powers are not required to increase their capiirinti j_tlrplus to the amount required by the State law of State BoEl.rd°:11'ns exercisinc trust powers. For the same reasons, the °Pin'on that a national bank which has been Cratted8:11 the p s- powers under the provisions of Section 11(k) of ederal Re grEttti, serve Act as amended, and which at the time of the th4t 4'6 of the Permit had the capital and surplus required by et, not required to increase its capital and surplus 4T 6/8/34 -8"because of a chane in the State law which requires State inexercising trust powers to increase their capital and surplus. Accordingly, the Board is of the opinion that the chalage in the law of the State of Pennsylvania referred to above does not affect the validity of the continued exercise of trust P°v'ers by a national bank in that State which previously had received apermit from the Board, and that such a national bank is -1c)t required to increase its capital and surplus to comply with , Provisions of the State law. In this connection, however, understood that the Attorney General of the State of taken the position that a national bank in that StLate at exercising fiduciary powers must increase its capital and urPlus to the same extent and in the same manner as is required case of State institutions exercising similar powers and " possible, therefore, that any national banks involved may Ifr,fer, to comply with the requirements of the State authorities her than to stand upon what the Board believes to be their gal rights and to run the risk of possible court action brought 0Y the State authorities." l T approved. Letter to Lr. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading 4 follows: 111- aer ' 11 accordance with yur recommendation, the FederalReB°ard approves a reduction in the common capital stock of leo Laconia Lational Lcconia, hampshire, from C tarik:,)00 to v50,000, pursuant to a plan which provides that the to: 13. caPital cha,7 sold to shall be increased by •50,000 of preferred stock local interests, and that the released capital be used to eliminate a corresponding amount of the least, desirable of june2,amt4s."in the bank, all as set forth in your meroranoum .pproved. Lotq. ,er to hir. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading f(alows: n, a tioll, .."'n ccordance with Acting Comptroller Await's recoTendacorm, 110 Feral -04 Reserve Board aproves a reduction in the Ltliacet -u-Pltal Stock 044 of 'The Citizens National Bank of Lancaster', ster TI 1,4 2 -..aw York, from AC)0,000 to A50,000, pursuant to a by h Provides the sal that the bank's capital shall be increased Sale o p fi -- '*420,000 of preferred stock to the Reconstruction 'Lee C orporation and/or others, and that the released capital, •ed Ile, 6/8/3,1 "tosether rith the bank's surplus, undivided profits and apPlicable reserves, shall be used to eliminate substandard assets, and to reduce the book value of lower Grade investment securities, all as set forth in Lr. Awalt's memorandum of .1:.ay 25 1934. Ihis action supersedes that previously taken in this matter as set forth in the hoard's letters dated January 16, 1933, and January 9, 1934. 'In considering the plan under which the reduction in comfl(311 capital is to be effected it has been noted that no provision n1Rde for the elimination of securities depreciation amountin:; aPproximately 65,700, which, if considered as a loss, oates a material capital impairment. It is also noted that r e examiner severely criticizes the bank's management and dietorate. It is assumed, however, that you have these condi; )ns in mind and that -whenever it is feasible to do so you vall obtain such further corrections as may be practicable." j j Approved. Letter to Lr. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading 4 '8 f 01101MS: 1_ "In accordance with the recommendation of Acting Comptrolaer of the Currency Await, the Federal Reserve Board approves tired uction in the common capital stock of 'The Peoples Naa1 Bank of Brooklyn in Lew York', 1,-ew York, New York, from ,.2.50,000, pursuant to a plan which provides that theoa,ctiitIsp:c:Pold tal shall be increased by c';300,000 of preferred to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and soota:-,Lc released capital shall be used to eliminate a corretio _E amount of ,1 all substandard assets and securities depreciaof may 291a79::t .uforth in Acting Comptroller Awalt's memorancum 4 Approved. Letter to L. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading "f01301,1 11 1. tion, .Je6111 ccordance with Actinf; Comptroller Aralt's r?commendacornmo , Federal Reserve Board approves a reduction in the caPital stock of a pi lerl'Ir "PD 'The First National Bank of Weatherly', an ' enniVivania, from ,;125,000 to S31,250, pursuant to by ;4-ii"-Lch provides that the bank's capital shall be increased of a Premi Drere--Ilm of Preferred stock to be sold to local interests at 46,875, and that the released capital, premium on rred 'cck and a portion of the bank's surplus and/or 1695 6/8/34 -10- undivided profits accounts shall be used to eliminate estimated 1"ses, doubtful assets and securities depreciation, all as set forth in Ia.. Awalt's letter of 1.]ay 26, 1934. t In this connection, it is understood that the common capial stock will not be reduced until the authorized issue of proerred stock is actually paid in and that the preferred stock ° be sold at a premium is to be retirable at its par value ather than at the price at which sold." Approved. Letter dated June 7, 1934, approved by five members of the 130ard 'to 1./‘.. O'Connor, uomptroller of the Currency, reading as fol1011,rz "In accordance with your recommendation, the Federal heLear d approves a reduction in the common capital stock of he First National Bank of Greenville', Greenville, PennsylTnia, from .125,000 to .31,250, pursuant to a plan which proies that the bank's capital shall be increased by the sale of i62'500 preferred stock to the Reconstruction Finance Corporaa °II and/or others, and that the released capital, tor,ether with „T°2cimately a80,000 from the bank's surplus, undivided profits assetsreserves, shall be used to eliminate or reduce substandard and securities depreciation, all as set forth in your 4)randum of Lay 2, 1934. "In consider 4 hlAOfl the plan der which the reduction in conp under ltal Is to bo effected, it has been noted that your ass ,ricIr recards the manaL;ement as weak and incompetent. It is uhe'x'llned, however, that you have this condition in mind :.,nd that a& ever it is feasible to do so, you will require such changes Illay be practicable." c nnection with the above letter the Board gave eonsiderato a memorandum dated June 4, 1954, from , r. Cherry, Assistant C1511nsel, callinP attention to the fact that the bank has been authorizod to exercise trust powers but stating that it is believed the 'oard would be justified in approving the reduction, notwithstanding 1;4 t4ct that the adjusted capital will be below the amount required l'or the oranization of a State institution with trust powers, and .Trie : ZT the bealk 7,111 have no surplus 316S6 6/8/34 -11Letter approved. Letter to IZr. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading f011ows 3 "In accordance with Acting Comptroller Analt's recommendation, the Federal Reserve Board approves a reduction in the .?0M1an capital stock of 'The Conumnity National Bank of Flush4-17-g1, Flushing, Ohio, from U0,000 to tie'35,000, pursuant to a lita Which provides that at the bank's capital shall be increased 4 n5,000 of preferred stock to be sold to the Reconstruction xe.nanee Corporation and/Or others, and that the released capital _heal be used to eliminate a corresponding mount of the least easirable assets in the bank, all as set forth in Mr. Anult's nlemorsziduz of May 24, 1934.H t Approved. Letter dated June 7, 1934, approved by five members of the 813"'cl, t^ - 4r. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading as follefts accordance with Acting Comptroller of the Currency , 1 71alt s rec ommendation, the Federal Reserve Board approves a 0 ; auctl". in the Common capital stock of 'The Home National Bank au utton', Sutton, Nest Virginia, from '0,000 to $30,000, puri aSt ! l te a Uplan which provides that the bank's capital shall be 00 liel- eased bY 0.00,000 of preferred stock to be sold to the Rererlistruction Finance Corporation and/Or others, and that the 64sed capital shall be used to eliminate a corresponding , E000011111t of un satisfactorw assets, all as set forth in 1.1r. Await s letter of May 24, 1934. Approved. Letter to Mr. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading ke fellowt: tiots 4.n. e0112„, theaccordance with Acting Comptroller Awalt's recomnendaFederal Reserve Board approves a reduction in the eapital stock of 'The First National Bank of Milledge, Milledgeville, Georgia, from 05,000 to 37,500, puriller„to a Plan which provides that the bank's capital shall be —"ed by the sale of 37,500 of preferred stock to the 8144 6M4 -12- Hu .Reconstruction Finance Corporation and that the released capital, together with a portion of the bank's surplus and/or undivided profits accounts shall be used to eliminate unsatisfactory assets in the amount of approximately 46,300, all as set forth in Mr. Awalt's letter of May 29, 1934." Approved. Letter to Ir. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading 618 f°1101its "In accordance with Acting Comptroller Await's recomrlenda' 10n, the Federal Reserve Board approves a reduction in the ,0211mon capital stock of the 'First National Bank of Pelham', Georgia, from $40,000 to $25,000, pursuant to a plan 1:111ch provides that the bank's capital shall be increased by 0 of preferred stock to be sold to the Reconstruction C Corporation, orporation and that the released capital shall be a used to eliminate approximately $10,000 of substandard assets ?stablish a reserve of 5,000 for losses and other contineles, all as set forth in Mr. Amalt's letter of I:ay 26, 4-a04." Approved. Letter to Er. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading c). fellows: a with the recomnendation of Acting Gomptro ' 1th 10_" Await,ccordance the Federal Reserve Board approves a reduction in Trent° ”rnmen capital stock of 'The Trenton National Bank', .issouri, whi from c . 100,000 to $50,000, pursuant to a plan h b oprovides that the bank's shall be increased by or preferred stock to becapital that° sold to local interests, and he released capital shall be used charge off or reduce aa i— Illin;;Jsfacto set fortn , . assets and/or establish a contingent fun, all in Lir. Awalt's memorandum of Lay 24, 1934.' Approved. Letter to 14:r. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading % 1 1 ti0..4, accordance with Acting Comptroller Awalt's rem lenda' 16 Federal Reserve Board approves a reduction in the S8 6/8/3,1 common capital stock of 'The First National Bank of Buhl', Buhl, a from A5,000 to :;.20,000, pursuant to a plan which ninrwsa" provides that the bank's capital shall be increased by 1 0,000 of 3 preferred stock to be sold to the Reconstruction -0.1nance Corporation and/or others, and that the released capital shall be used to eliminate unsatisfactory assets, as set fertn in Li. Awalt's memorandum of hay 25, 1934." Approved. Letter to :„r. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading as followE: . "Receiot is acknowledged of your letter of June 1, 1934, 11. regard to the proposed reduction in capital of 'The First A.a-cienal Bank of LOME! Linda', Lora Linda, California, which was 4PPrord by the Board January 23, 1934. 'You advise that the bank now desires to reduce its capital .4.5'°00 and sell a like amount of preferred stock to the Reconruction Finance Corporation instead of effecting a reduction increase in capital af 25,000 each, as originally contem13 !.ted. It is noted that the plan now proposed will permit the :.,-L2.ndnation of all items classed as worse than slow by your ex. '`w4a-111er in the laLest report of examination, and all depreciation 133. securities. it In accordance with your recommendation, the Board amends e,s,Previeus approval to provide for a reduction in the common att?Ital of the applicant bank from 50,000 to 335,000 and the cole A5,000 of preferred stock to the Reconstruction Finance thrPeratten, with the understanding that the other provisions of c)riinal plan remain unchanged." Approved. Two erea telegrams to jr. Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Fed- Reserve Bank of New York, stating that the Board has given con- Ilideration to the applications of the "Atlas Corporation", Jersey City, :r °- uereY, and the "Pacific Eastern Corporation", New York, 1,011/ York, t°r 'v-otit{); permits under the authority of section 5144 of the Revised tiAtes of the United States, as amended, entitling such organizatt, ' 114 to vote the stock which they (win or control in the "American C Pany", San Francisco, California, and has authorized the 16(20 6/8/34 -14issuance of limited permits to the applicants for the following purPoses/ "At any time prior to August 1, 1934, to act upon a proPosal or proposals to create, issue and sell to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation preferred stock of such trust company having a par value of seven million, five hundred thousand d°11Ars (S7,500,000), to reduce the common stock of such trust company from ten million dollars (0.0,000,000) to seven million, five hundred thousand dollars ($7,500,000) and to make such Amendments to the certificate of incorporation or articles of association and/Or by-laws of said trust company and to take such other action as shall be necessary to effect such purposes, !"(Ivided that such proposal or proposals shall be in accordance Iiflth a plan or plans which shnll be satisfactory to the Federal le?erve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and auich shall have been approved by the appropriate supervisory including, with respect to the reduction of common th F C: =3 y . Reserve Board; also to elect directors of and to conduct such other matters of a routine _ ture as are ordinarily acted upon at the annual meetings of 110.11 trust company.” The, ' L elegrAlas authorized the agent to have prepared by counsel for the Federal reserve bank, and to issue to the Atlas Corporation and the Pacific Eastern Corp oration, limited voting permits in accordance 17itil the telegneLMS, The telegrams also requested that, upon the issulco to —o a pplicants of the limited voting permits above authorized, tha elent wire the Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank °I' 44 Francisco to that effect. Approved. tXl CO : nection with the above there NUS presented a telegram t° evIton 4z1 ,irealcisc o. Federal Reserve AJ;ent at the Federal Reserve Bank of EIPPlioation of stating that the Board has 7,iven consideration to the the " American Company", San Francisco, California, ()Is 4 Ir°til Permit unaer the authority of section 5144 of the Revised 17(10 6/8/34 -15S tErtutes of Idle United States: as amended, entitling such organization to vote tho stock which it owns or controls in the "American Trust CompanY", San Francisco: California, and has autnorized the '811ance of a limited permit to the applicant, subject to the following condition: hereb:iihatprior to the issuance of the limited voting permit authorized, you shall be advised by the Federal Reserve AGent u a- -ew York that pursuant to Board's AliCIGAR telegrams of ; 701? date herewith he has issued to Atlas Corporation and _ aelfle Eastern Corporation limited voting permits respectively authorIzed by such telegrams." and for the following purposes: hn t?sailt any time prior to August 1, 1934, to act upon a proproposals to create, issue and sell to the ReconstruchlOn Fance in Corporation preferred stock of such trust company 41711.11:67 a Par value of seven million, five hundred thousand cf-,:ars (Q7,500,000), to reduce the common stock of such trust ,r"PanY from ten million dollars (10,000,000) to seven million, 'Ive hundred thousand dollars (7,500,000) and to make such a_elldments to the certificate of incorporation or articles of 8142!°ciation and/or by-law% of said trust company and to take ,en other vrovided thaction as shall be necessary to effect such purposes, at such proposal or dth a proposals shall be in accordance Plan or plans which shall be satisfactory to the Federal 14:111svel ent at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and attl, - suall have been approved by the appropriate supervisory the?rities, includinP-, with respect to the reduction of common ellol atoeiK: Federal Reserve Board; also to elect directors of routitruz;t c°mPany and to conduct such other matters of a n.7, nature as are ordinarily acted upon at ,he annual meet-6 0- such trust company." c "Cram autfIOrized the agent to have prepared by counsel for the ?ed"al re8er "bank- and to issue to the American Company, a limited lic)till{)' Permit in a ccordance with the telegram• The telegram also regitle8ted that, upon the issuance of the limited voting permit above a41th°rited, the agent, addition vdser to the usual notification to the 111kIrd) 4dViSe the Feder:: Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank a 0/34 -16- nem York or such issuance in order that his records may be camPlete. Approved, together with a letter to Mr. Newton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, reading as follows: Reference is made to Assistant Federal Reserve Agent Sart;ent's letter of February 9, 1934, recommending favorably the Proposed reduction in common capital stock of the 'American 7USt Companyt, San Francisco, California, from :)10,000,000 to Z11 7 52°,000, Pursuant ' pursuant to a plan which provides for the sale to Finance Corporation of ,;.7,500,000 pax value preferred stock and provides also that the released capital , 2,4500,000, to ether with c6,000,000 of the surplus fund, be "sed for the elimination of substandard assets and establishing reserves. In accordance with your recomrendation, the Board approves tcheowritediuonetsion in common capital stock subject to the following 1, That prior to the time when such reduction in capital is effected the bank's capital shall be increased by the sale at par of 0,500,000 par value preferred stock to the Roc onstruction Finttlice Corporation, and, without reducing the aggregate amount of its capital stock and surplus below 419 ,000,000, such banir shall charge off or otherwise eliminate, if it has not already done so, losses of 7$216,555 on loans and other assets as shown in the rePort of an examination made by an examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank of an Francisco as of October 24, 1933, and all other depreciation on stocks, defaulted bonds and °II securities other than those in the four highest grades as classified by a recognized investment service organization n gradingregularly engaged in the business of rating or securities. exte ) 012 are requested to advise the Board as to the nature and " 1 or the eliminations made by the bank." 1 lsgram dated June 7, 1934, approved by five members of the 13(3ard, to mr. Peyton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve ilk of Linneapolis, stating that the Board has given consideration to th 6 aPPlication of the "First Bank Stock Corporation", lanneapolis, nota, for a votino. permit under the authority of section 5144 of .1.. 0 6/8/34 Reiriried -17Statutes of the United States, as amended, entitling such c)rgallization to vpte the stock which it owns or controls in "The Nati0 rial Bank of Jamestown", Jamestown, North Dakota, and has authorized the issuance of a limited permit to the applicant for the following Pul'Posesz "At any time prior to August 1, 1934, to act upon a proor proposals to create, issue and sell to the Reconstruction Fillance Corporation preferred stock of such bank having a par 7 balue , of fifty thousand dollars (50,000) and to reduce the tan-h- s common stock from one hundred thousand dollars (0100,000) fifty thousand dollars (50,000) and to make such amendments o the bank i s articles of association and to take such other acOr°n as shall be necessary to effect such purposes; such proposal ProPosals to be in accordance with a plan or plans which shall r been approved by the appropriate supervisory authorities and vjhtch sha.11 be satisfactory to the Federal Reserve Agent at the Fe°O Feder Reserve Bank of idinneapolis." The cslegram also authorized the agent to have prepared by counsel for the , rederal reserve bank, and to issue to the First Bank Stock Corporaticri, a . 12-Thited voting permit in accordance with the telegram. Approved, together with a letter, also dated June 7, 19:34, and approved by five members or the Board, to L. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading as follows: Res8"In accordance with Lir. Await's recommendation, the Federal reduction in the common capital stock Jamestown', Jamestovn, North Dakota, 50,0u0, pursuant to a planwhich provides that stoci,a1.41 .k s eaPital shall be increased by '4,50,000 of preferred the 'e be sold to the 1,:econstruction Finance Corpora-bion, that orSe` '-otuit 'relea A4 capital shall be used to eliminate a corresponding &lad uns'atisfactory assets or to set up reserves therefor, that 05,00o the Pirst Bank Stock Corporation shall contribute t° atlePrient the undivided profits account, all as set forth 11111 • Awalt's memora.ndum of May 22, 1934. 3./12-La 11 connection, the Board feels that where, as in this funds are a.vo.ilable, it would be preferable if losae--°11 were made for the elimination of at least all estimated 8 ttncl cle preciaidon in securities in the lower grades, rather of ,1:n ve BOar d approves a , r0 National Bank of tlernb $1 ', 00000 to r) c 4 6/8/34 -18"than to carry such unsatisfactory assets in the bank, even thou7h offset by reserves, unless such rc.servcs are specifically allo?,ted to and deducted from the respective accounts in all published statemonts of condition. It is assumed, however, that Your office will require such charge-offs as may be found desirable and practicable when the adjustments are consummated." Letter to Er. Williams, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal 48erve Bank of Cleveland, readinir, as follows: "rihis is in reply to Lir. Fletcher's letter of Lay 15, 1934, tal t FraTraph of which he asks whether the Board agrees his ( 1) 11/cixythat the Puritan aater Company of Pittsburgh, be an affiliate of Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust p°111PanYs a member bank, also situated in Pittsburgh. It appears om letters, copies of which were forwarded by hr. Fletcher, (7 .; (1110 ) per cent of the stock of the Puritan Water Company is the First National Bank at Pittsburgh and that 27,247 l ò'u"es of stock of the First National Bank at Pittsburgh are n" by the Peoples -Pittsbh -Pittsburgh Trust Company an 'in its own right' 71 1 2236 shares are held by it in a fiduciary capacity. It is ttso understood that the last election of directors of the Naeral Bank was held in January, 1934, et which election a total '5,,970 shares were voted. Ilhe Board is entirely in accord with the opinion expressed Pletcher's letters that the fact that certain shares which are orl,held in a fiduciary capacity are not registered in the name earirPlesPittsburgh Trust Company, as trustee, does not neces'Y mean that they are not controlled by that company. It ttha° aP,Tees that the only way in which to determine whether such 41 aro controlled by the 'rust Company is to obtain additionoth' e °1Mation as to the terms of the deeds of trust, wills, or which they are held, with particular mMti : a to the Of in which it is determined how the shares fa, I°ok are to be voted and to the manner in which they are in VOted. j tt ?IIr 4elao rte r tyavoid misunderstanding in other cases and to in which the Board interprets the statutory tiollTion of an affiliate it is advisable to discuss an addiis cal minor point even at the risk of explaining a natter Witich Ititte' aeadY , clear to you. It seems from the correspondence subMr- Fletcher's letter that both he and the Trust :trust .Z...21ssume that the affiliation in question exists if the sharn 144..Ni controls more than 50 per centum of the number ef dire4 - , f the Hat ional Bank voted at the preceding election of to doZc °f tho Bank. In the particLlar case there is no reason su„trc that this is so, but under the definition the important '°11 is whether the Trust Company controls, directly or rraj 1_704 6/8/34 -19- it • 4„ 1 ," 11 rectlY, more than 50 per centum of the number of shares of Viater Company which were voted for the election of directors of the Water , ompany at the preceding election, end to decide thi8 it is necessarv to determine not whether the Trust Company (311trol5 more than 50 per centum of the number of shares of the ' etoted for the election of its directors at the preceding on, but whether the Trust Company controls the Bank. The distinction is of significance in very few cases but it would be itiportant if we were to imagine That the ?coples-Pittsburgh Trust ComPany controls 28,000 shares of the Bank which mould be 111°re than .an 50 per centum of the number of shares voted at the 4st of the Bank's directors but loss than 50 per centum of the total number of shares outstanding and that a competing .- 11-12t company owns 31,000 shares of the stock of the Bank -which per cent, of the total number of shares outstanding. f;v-aese facts the Trust Company would be a holding company af,;,'-iate of the Lank because it would fall within one of the "i':!),?ific categories of the definition of a holding company afn ate in section 2(c) of the Banking Act of 1933. It is ;-,-?eable, however, that control .34 'the Bank would be in the com' e iaZ tTust company and not in the Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust ComIf Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Company did not control the 1707 . ' it 'would not indirectly control any of the stock of the aff% C°mPanY with the result taat the -liater Company would be an Of ?"-iate of the Bank and of the competing trust company but not: -che, Pe°Ples-Pittsbur,;h Trust Company. the l it is not clear to the Board that die statement made in 7, 1c to the last paragraph of Lr. Fletcheri s letter of Yay hater, in correct. It is there suggested that the Puritan pan Company is an affiliate of Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust ComburYBecause „ it 1,Z1.1 which is is a subsidiary of First National Bank nt 2ittsan affiliate of Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Company i:;;I t':ln the statutory definition by reason of the procence of 00171,ric'eking directors on the boards of the Bank and the Trust thelnY' Under •the definition of an affiliate in section 2(b) Company if thur ..a is an affiliate of the Trust Company ''atr ° major?. tilL Company controls in any manner the election of a that ' t 3t i Y of the directors of the Y.ater Company. It is cle clear, of eer,,pre le sence on the board of directors of the 1;ationa1 Bank rnay directors of the Trust Company is an element whch be doen 411113°rtant in decidin,whether or not the Trust Company seerize) tcercise such control but the statement made by Lir. Pletcher becau,2 indicate that the affiliation necessarily results solely the Boardof the community of directors and it is the opinion of that no such interpretetion is justified in the light °f the Pcscibl,P!elfic language of the statutory definition. It is uhnt the Board has misconstrued Kr. Fletcher's statelettoll-st,is recognized, of course,hr. Fletcher closes that co LY stating that he expresses no final opinion upon En. 1705 6/8/34 -20- "the point but Trust company. merely calls the latter to the attention of the "Prom information available to the Board it appears that !he Dormont Savins and Trust Company, Dormont, i'ennsylvania, a r,tate member bank, is a subsidiary of the Peoples-Pittsburgh Just Compan y. If the Puritan nater Company is indirectly conro .11ed by the Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Company, which awns a D.lajority of the stock of the Dormont Savings and Trust Company, 2 1. aa affiliate of the latter under the terms of section and should be so reported by Dormont Savings and Trust mPany in response to future calls." Approved. Telegram to Lr. Williams, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reser__ vt$ ballk of Cleveland, reading as follows: F. "Referring hr. Fletcher's wire June 4 iNARRATEDLY The alr2t LLtional Bank of Stockport, Chio, 18 shares, June 6', on telegram was deferred pending receipt of formal appliCation i; as number of shares of Federal Reserve stock applied for ttuicated insufficient capital for organization of a new national riloll1 and as Oranization Divis4 on of Comptroller's office had no tice of proposed organization of such bank. It now appears or-c this is not a newly organized bank but proposed reopening be : 1111/1k whose Federal Reserve bank stock was canceled Septem wn ;29, 1933, on application of receiver and that subject bank lleensed by Secretary of Treasury to resume business on June bi ut l're understand Comptroller's office has not been notified 1.11er that bank has been returned to board of directors. Pircit ;3Tc)ard approves issue of 16 shares of stock in name of The Aatiohal Bank of Stockport, Stockport, Ohio, effective if the bank is ,! he %01( 1r authorized by Comptroller of Currenc', to ut for business." t Approved. 14erils:Tandum dated June 5, 1934, from glaite Smead, Chief of the 1°11 °f l''arlk Operations, stating that, in view of the fact that 111111211. °f t1Pit6-1 notes slid elltIk ' ee ill the Cr State member banks have issued preferred stock or debentures, it is necessary to make a number of 501W1flual report of earnings and dividends, form 107, thIlt it may reflect the amount of such capital funds 17CP: 6/8/34 -21- (314ctandins, the anount set aside for the retirement thereof, and the elaelalt or dividends end/or interest paid thereon, and recommending that the form be revised as indicated on the copy attached to the MB/noreaTiqM. The memorandum stated also that it is understood that the office of the Comptroller of the Currency has made similar changes Info rm 2129 used by national banks in reporting earnings and dividends. Thn -recommendation was approved by five members of the Board on June 7, 1934, Approved. Letter dated June 6, 1934, approved by five members of the 4t)r (' t 14r. Crane, Deputy Governor ' of the Federal Reserve Bank of 4°17 York readans as follows: -Ln accordance with the request contained in your letter of -ixY 31, 1934, the Federal Reserve Board approves the action of Ys°11.r d irectors in authorizing the officers of the Federal Re8.11k of Now York to open and maintain an account on the ee°4 of the bank in the name of the Banco de Eexico and to carry operations in this market for that bank along substantially tee same general lines and subject to substantially the same Eterras and oaaditions as for other foreign central banks having °01-Ints. with you. relat : /t, is noted that the action of your directors restricts the 4-0n.0 to be established with the Banco de Lexie° to the opena ono-way account and it will be appreciated if you will 0 the the Board for its records a copy of your letter to de Lexie°, setting forth the terms and conditions upon WhICh n , account with that institution will be opened and maintamed d.tionso t. co t,ether with a copy of the bank's acceptance of the n I Your letter states that, if the opening of the account is z- oved 41)1,,r, , Your bank will offer a participation in the account the 0ther to pro,7e Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board apzerve%the Participation in the account by any of the Federal redreor,e-anks which may desire to do so, and letters are being adt°daY to the chairmen of the banks advising them accord- fel%n Approved. 17C7 6/8/34 -22Letter to Ea.. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, reading as follows: "Receipt is acknouledged of your letter of L'ay 22, 1934, ..11ggesting a conference of the trust examiners for the various rederal reserve bsnks and asking whether the Board would appr°ve of your calling such a conference. It is noted that the other Federal Reserve Agents concur in the opinion that such a conference would be desirable. "The Board believes that such a conference mould be helpin coordinating the work of the trust e:mminers and in de ,eveloping satisfactory procedure for the examination of trust uePartments, but suggests that the conference be held sometime t!le first part of 6eptember in order that the newly appointed trt examiners may have an opportunity of obtaining a somewhat '!roader background of actual experience as a basis for the dis:ns. It is suggested, also, that consideration be given advisability of having the conference attended by the u:.stant Federal Reserve Agents in charge of examinirr; work, as 1 as by the trust examiners. It is believed that in the cirlv ances it would be desirable to hold the conference in a shlngton. tel,_"In order that the conference may be most. helpful, it is pet-Leved that careful consideraion should be given to the prevara.tion of the program, which should then be submitted to the thulsozan: and the Board well in advance of the meetin7, ,those attending the conference to come fully prepared for the discussions." F4 Lpproved. Letter 1301a, to the dated June 6, 1934, approved by five members of the Covernors of all Federal reserve banks, reading as fol- "The report of the comnittee on the function of custodies ceireder hi Reserve banlo dated March 11, 1927, which Was retajed and approved by the May 1927 Governors' Conference conthe f-ol -awing question and recommendation: zeeuri 4. Should Federal reserve banks receive for safekeeping show, ,ties wIlich are the property of member banks, and, if so, 941Y distinction be made as to the location of the member bek* cit ; that is, should the same service be rendered to both cI country banks The Federal reserve banks are all rendering a safekeeping service to their member banks and it is doubtful if the 1708 6/8/34 -23"banks could avoid the rendering of this service to at least a limited e:Ktent, even if they desired to do so. For instance, the banks necessarily hold large amounts of securities as collateral to loans. The loans are paid off and the securities generally are permitted to remain with the reserve bank as a matter of convenience and in anticipation of the need for further borrowing. Securities so held, even though originally pledged as collaberal, are held in safekeeping and it would be very difficult, if not quite impossible, to avoid the holding of securities in such cases. In addition, a large number of bank have lodged with their Federal reserve banks for safekeeping all or a substantial part of their security holdings. In some districts the reserve banks are already holding a majority of all of the securities owned by the country member banks within the districts. This represents a service of very great value to the country menber bank and, incidentally , to the public interest generally, for the reason that the majority of country banks do not have vaults of proper strength for the safeguarding of their property. Your committee believes that the value of this service to the member banks is far beyond its comparatively small cost to the Federal Reserve System and that it is a service vhich is incident to the maintenance of the reserve actit Itcount. recommends, therefore, that the Federvl reserve banks receive for safekeeping securities which are the property of their country member banks. As to whether or not this servic e should be rendered to both city and country banks, it is the view of the committee that in general the policy should be to limit the safekeeping of securities to member banks outside of reserve and branch cities, but that the reserv banks should e e;:ercise discretion in the case of banks which do not have ade quate vault protection of their awn, regardless of uR location'. jes to the Board's letter B-905 o July 12, 1933, rehe Pi gardilic,et Reserve extent and cost of the service rendered by Federal zeeurit4banks to member banks and others in the safekeeping of the `-, 'el3 indicate that Reserv banks severa are e follow not l ing for soarlirmi ttee's recamnendation as quoted above but are accepting 4re th ?k°ePing all securities tendered by member banks, which cated rr Property , without regard to thether the banks are lotReserve bank or branch city or outside such cities. "The 1 Reserve hoard is in accord with the abovequoted g0 Of ti "ttee recommendation to the Governors' Conference and there), le °Pinion that the Federal Reserve banks should be guided 'Ys Th0 board recognizes, however, that at times it may be 6/8/34 -24"to the interest of the Federal Reserve banks to hold in safekeeping (or in 'collateral account' although not actually Pledged as security for borrowings or deposits), for member banks located in Federal Reserve bank and branch cities, United States Government securities which are the exclusive property of such member banks, particularly when the securities are being used from time to time as collateral to borrowings from the Federal Reserve banks, and interposes no objections to Federal Reserve banks rendering member banks this service. It feels, howr,ex-, that this service should not be rendered by the Federal .Leserve banks for local member banks with adequate vault facilisu?es except for limited periods and to the extent that it contributes to the efficient and economical operation of the Reserve banks. r It is noted from the replies to the Board's letter of July 1933, that some of the Reserve banks are holding in custody member banks securities pledged by such banks as collateral .0 loans ?s of theobtained by them from their correspondents. The Board opinion that this service should not be rendered except inemergency cases. It is also noted that at some of the Re: erve banks securities are being hold in safekeeping for the c°unt of various receivers of closed banks. In this connecthe Board feels that, while there is no objection to retain4g the securities held in safekeepin,; at the time of suspension member bank until the receiver has had an opportunity to ' 7 other 11e arrangements, nedeposits w of securities should not e accepted. roe. "The Board recognizes that there may be valid and persuasive ke 8?lic why the Reserve banks should wish to receive for safe,071nr securities pledged by a member bank to secure public de',.ente and that an anendment of the Federal Reserve Act is desirable in order that the Reserve banks may be pa Bot;!-,fleally authorized to do so. Please, therefore, advise the the of Your views as to the desirability of an amendment of colua ' aw in this respect and furnish any suggestions vinich you or or cc!!! for Your bank desire to make with respect to the scope ..Lent of such amendment. 1etter1 84mrrAry statement (B-916) of the replies to the 3card's °f July 12, is inclosed for your information." j 4proved. Letter dated June 6, 1934, approved by five members of the 130a-rd, to 14r. C urtiss, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, re4dilql as follows: "he Board has reviewed the report of examination of the 1710 6/8/34 -25"Federal Reserve Bank of Boston as of April 14, 1931, copies of which were left with you end Governor Young. it has been reported that because of the inadequate number °f employees in the Auditing Department and the volume of work handled in the Gollection and Transit Departments, it has not been possible, mitilout seriously interfering with the operations of the departments, to carry out the recommendation made at the time of the previous examination (October 7, 1933) that audits eh departments be enlarged in scope so as to include a con-c!roluon incoming nail for a period of time subsequent to the date or the audits. The Board feels that if possible audits of the Collection and Transit Departments should be made periodically .,long the lines recommended by the examiner. Since, however, for the reasons stated, you do not feel that audits of the Colion and Transit Departments of your bank can be made in such 111811110r, alternative plans should be worked out which would rein equally thoroush audits of the departments. It has been repoted that some such plans were under consideration, and the 11rd would be interested in learning what plans have been adopted. It h as been observed (pa;e 47) that securities are being el in safekeeping for the account of receivers of various 130 : 87;(1 l'anks, and it will be appreciated if you will advise the u as to the nature of such safekeeping accounts. In this COnn,s-a. to 't-vzlon, the Board feels that, -4hile there is no objection a_retaining the securities held in safekeeping at the time of of a member bank until the receiver has had an opaho ---,Ay to make other arrangements, new deposits of securities uld not Le accepted. , Joard notes that the question of effecting corrections c)f matters criticized in connection with the examinations of 0 member banks was discussed with you by its examiner and is ' .3arl.lb ed to learn that definite action will be taken by your clothe merit Promptly to effect corrictions of matters criticized in tioj eEc)rts of examination of State member banks if such correc' n"ave not been obtained by the State supervisory authorities. ertiti After the report and this letter have received the considthe 211 of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank, beela °ttrd would appreciate advice from you as to villat action has or will be taken on the matters discussed." Approved. Letter 131.rd, to dated June 6, 1934, approved by five members of the ood, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank or readin{; as foliows: J1_711 6/8/3.1 -26"This refers to a letter dated April 4, 1934, to the Federal Rese rve Board from Lr. James H. Grover, President of St. Louis Union Trust Company, it. Loui s, Missouri, a copy of which Ms forwarded to the Board with a letter dated May 4, 1934, from ' • C. M. Stewart, Assistant Fede ral Reserve Agent at St. Louis. Grover states in his letter that it has now been determined that St. Louis Union Trust Company is not a 'holding company affiliate' of the Firs t National Bank in A. Louis within the meaning of the defi nition in Section 2(c) of the Banking Act of 1933, since at the last election of directors of the First ilational Bank, the St. Louis -union Trust Company 'did not vote 50,:, of the shares of stock voted at that election, even includin allcf g its own stock and stock that was voted in various capacisuch as trustee, or agent, or attorney-in-fact, * * * • "The Board does not have at hand sufficie nt information to enable it to determine whether or not St. Louis Union Trust Corn"Y is ncoa a holdinL, company affiliate of the First National ' : t - and it is clear that the facts set fort h in Mr. Grover's lotter are not sufficiently comp lete to permit a determination. In ic/cidinG whether a corporation is a holding company affiliate it , 3 , necessary to ascertain the extent of its ownership cr control 0' the stock of a subsidiary member bank and the existence of such ownership or control is to be determin ed from facts as they exist at the time of the determinatio n, not from the facts which existed at the c time of the last election of directors. As Lir. vot °17 ,..r does not state whe-Li er St. Louis Union Trust Company all of the stoc k whic at the time of the election it h 'ed or or controlled and also fails to disclose any changes of i: 4T'shiP or control which have taken place since such time, it J-Er ssible to determine whet • her his conclusion is correct. . 1:1t la inco hout mcaninr to indicate that Mr. Grover's conclusi on _, 0 _ rrect, the Board is of the opinion that the foregoin 1 ul 17a_ lo d be g brought to Mr. Grover's attention in orde that r there f? no /rdsunde rstanding as to the possibility that the Board filip.tnd 'that the Trus t Company is still a holding company afof and that a voting permit may be necessary if the stock vot9,1° national bank whic h it awns or controls is to be validly fy In this conn ection it is deemed advisable that you satisYourself conci on the question and forward to the Board your awn stocklTsi°48 and the reasons therefor . In determinin; whether oontr rld by the Trust Gompany in a fiduciary relationship is Yclxr by it within the moaning of the statutor defi y nition, 19z4, ..%:ention is called to the Board's letter date Apri d l 17, 4-7871\ serve ‘ Bank ar,, ell c oat s1: . Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Rent, terminille Board has no objection to deferring the requeste dod if in your opinion either the advisability of utilE future exam ination of the Trust Company or any other 6/8/34 -27It reason justifies the delay." Approved. Letter dated June 6, 1954, approved by five members of the Board, to Senator Fletcher, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency of the United States Senate, reading as follows: c "Receipt is acknowledged of the letter from the Acting lerk of your Committee, dated May 24, 1934, requesting a rePort on S. 3666, entitled 'A Bill to amend section 61 (relating to deposits of bnrkrupt estates) of the Act entitled "An Act establish a uniform system of bankruptcy throughout the United States", approved July 1, 1898'. The bill mould amend s!otion 61 of the Bankruptcy Act so as to authorize depositaries ( t1 3 funds of bankrupt estates to secure the repayment of such almcia bY a pledge of assets, in lieu of a surety bond, and so me to eliminate the requirement in respect to security 'for so , uch ef said deposits as are insured by the Federal Deposit Illeurace Corporation'. 'It does not appear that the matter is one that comes within the the B jurisdiction of the Federal Reserve Board and, acordingly, does not feel that it mould be proper for it to express oPinion in respect to the desirability of such an amendment." Approved. Letter dated June 6, 1934, approved by five members of the Bottrd, to Senator Fletcher, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Cull'ettey or the United States Senate, reading as follows: :Recsipt is acknowledged of your letter of June 1, 1934, in poec " You state that you have introduced as S. 3700 the bill proof by the Board to amend the last two paragraphs of section 19 be ins Federal Reserve Act, and that the 'whole of such bill will Bulkil.corporated in a new bnrk bill to be reintroduced by Senator eY, of Ohio. ft 1408t xte Board appreciates your prompt consideration of its reYour assistance in this matter." Approved. Lotter dated J 6, 1934, approved by five members of the to Lir* R. H. Sparkman, Acting Clerk of the Committee on Banking 171_3 6/8/34 -28and C urrency of the United States Sena te, reading as follows: "Ihis refers to the request containe d in your letter of May 31, 1934, on behalf of the Committee on Banking and Currency of the United States Senate, for a report on S. 3700, entitled 'A Bill To amend section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, and for other purposes'. "Under date of May 29, 1934, the Federal Rese rve Board addressed a letter to the Honorable Luncan U. Fletcher, Chairman of the Committee on Bankinf; and Currency, transmitting a draf t of a Proposed bill to amend the last two paragraphs of said section 19 and reco mmending its enactment; and on May 30 Sena e tor Fletcher intr oduced S. 3700, which is identical with ,he draft of the bill recommended by the Board. The Board favors the enactment of 6. 3700 for the reasons stated in its tiett he er of May 29, and in the circumstances no further report by Board on the bill woul d appear to be necessary." Approved. Bwc Letter to Lx. C. 0. Getter, Cashier of The First National of Lewville, Pennsylvania, reading as follows: "ReeeiPt is acknowled-ed of your letter of May 8, 1934, regard to the payment of certain certificates of deposit %jell You state represent bona fide thrift accounts. he matre 48 been the subject of previous correspondence, and you quest the Board to review its letter of i'ay 7, 1934, (il the in view fact that the form of certificate used by your bank contt.ns that 'if not withdrawn for 6 or more months, i, ?rest at the rate of 3;; per annum will be paid'. Apparently thel Mir impression that the inclusion of such a provision in ,w_. e ertificate is sufficient to constitu te the certificate an oftner form of receipt', as that term is used in the defi nition Boa4,,savings deposit' which is containe d in section V(a) of the ru,s Regulation Q. stated in its letter of May 7, it Board is the view of the that the phra se 'oth er form rece of ipt' , within the meanInustef the requ irem ent Regu of lati on 'sav that Q ings depo sits be is not evidenced by a 'pass book or other form of receipt', tte be interpreted as incl uding a certificate of deposit °Y its term s contemplates that only one deposit will be 11130;7floed thereby and that the entire amou nt will be repaid surrendersurrender of the certificate. The intentio of ton n Regulaof a q is that receipts for savings deposits shall be contracts vhiche"tinuing characte r evidencing deposits the amount of nlaY be increased or decreased from time to time without 1714 6/V34 -29- "the nocessity of surren dering the receipt or issuing another such receipt. The provision which you state is incorporated in each certificate of deposit used by your bank does not indicate that the contra ct set out in the certificate is one of a continuinP; character coverins deposits made from time to time, and the fact that the certificate may have no definite maturity is not determinative of the question whether the certificate is one of the kind contem plated by the Board in the use of the term 'Other form of receiote 'The Board has noted your statement that you do not desire t° issue savings pass books as your customers are familiar with Tid accustomed to using certificates of deposit and because you feel that your customers will be 'dissatisfied in not receiving interest until from the first of the succeeding month on depsits made, say after the 5th of the month in which deposited.' There is no provision in the Federal Reserve Act or in any fegulation prescribed by the Board which requires a member bank ' (;(1 Pay interest on savin,-s deposits received after the 5th day f any month as of a period beginning on or after the first day of the succeeding month, but interest may lawfully be paid on ,_y_dePosit which complies with the definition of a savings de:1-t contained in the Board's Regulation Q at a rate not in 4_,_"8 of that prescribed in such regulation commencin;; with the ate of receipt. self-addressed stamped envelope inclosed with your letter r ls returned herewith." Approved. Letter dated June i, 1934, approved by three members of the Boc,rd.3 t °Li Joseph J. Thorndike, Boston, Massachusetts, readinr, as rou.0,,,ra a .urihe Federal Reserve Board has given consideration to your 4P1?.cation under Section 32 of the Banking Act of 1933 for a r1?-t to serve at the same time as vice president and director fi _tne t‘arren National Bank, Peabody, Massachusetts, and as of-,;ertIof Thorndike & Allen, Boston, Massachusetts. tio It pu;h thatappears from the information contained in your applicathe business of Thoradike 6: Allen is confined to the 011 ase and sale of securities in the open market as brokers ei,_,"e order and for the account of others. The Board has coned that the provisions of Section 32 are not applicable to bri,„11 buniness, and for that reason no permit is necessary to Your service to the two institutions named in your applicaInt° "nformity with the provisions of Section 32. flowever, Section BA of the Clayton Act makes it unlawful W 4 0/34 -30- "for any director, offjeer, or employee of any bank, banking ass ociation, or trust company, organized or operating under the laws of the United States to serve at the same time as a director, officer, or employee of any corporation (other than a mutual savings bank) or as a member of a partnership which makes leans secured by stock or bond collateral, other than to its own sub sidiaries. The Loard is of the opinion that the carrying of raargin accounts involves the making of such loans within the Theaninz of this section; and it appears that the carrying of Illsr gin accounts constitutes a substantial portion of the business of T horndike Allen. t The Federal Reserve Board is authorized by Section 8 of h? Clayton Act to issue permits covering relationships between 1) .t more than three banking institutions which are otherwise proi hited by Section 8 or Section 8A, if such relationships are not reomPatible with the public interest. However, it is not the s practice to issue permits authorizing relationships beZen national banks and institutions carrying margin accounts 8AcalLl e it appears that one of the principal purposes of Section ,e was to terminate such relationships and that the issuance of ;111-ts authorizing such relationships mould be incompatible ;Ile public interest as declared by the Congress. ,141_ In the circumstances, irrespective of whether or not Thorn&: len is a banking institution of a kind referred to in „i _'1°/1 8, it will be necessary for you to discontinue your ser(;;' .rs with one or the other of the institutions named Acter to above in conform with the provisions of Section 8A of the Clayton serl„ I:lease advise the Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Recom ' D ank of Boston of the action which you take in order to P-1.Y with tho law." pp roved. terve Letter to hr. Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal ReBank of New York, reading as follows: appl."The Federal Reserve Board has given consideration to the 1341.1kl'e tion of 1.",r. Lewis G. harriman under Section 32 of the Pr Act of 1933 for a permit to serve at the same time as "Ident and • tuff, director of hanufacturers & Traders Trust Company, 0' ilew York, D' and as president and director of the I. (3,1,111t It Corporation, Buffalo, Lew York. Poret. aPPears that the business of the M. T. Discount Corth4t 1SUch°11 is Purchasinp and selling bankers' acceptances and constitutes its sole business activity. he board tyPO believes that bankers' acceptances are not the Secti°: securities which the Congress had in mind in enacting -11 32 'and, accordingly, that the LI.& T. Discount 171G 6/8/34 -31- II Corporation should not be regarded as engaged primarily in the business of purchasing, selling, or negotiating securities within the scope of that section. Therefore, a permit covering the re lationships described in the above application is not necessary. "Accordingly, unless there are other facts which you believe ,hould be called to the attention of the Board, it is suggested "that you so advise the applicant." Approved. Telegram dated June 6, 1934, approved by three members of the hoaPd, to Lir. Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank Of lkry Yok, reading as follows: 2 ollowing 141-;re received from Calkins, San Francisco: .f erring our wire May 28 Board's reply thirty first. According nevmPaper reports a group of hew York and Los An;:eles National 1111ks together with group of security dealers have successfully ld for eight million state of California bonds. It would apPear that reference in New York Times May 16 to ruli ruling of Board has b een construed to mean that permit to engage in such transi°ns is lch are unnecessary. Unless situation is clarified banks permitted to disregard regulations have advantage over flanks observing them.' Please advise if possible what banks and '0'°!Ilers comprised successful biddinc; group and whether in your llen relationships were such as to reouire permits under Sec32, giving details. It is suggested that, if you have not sul ' aeu.dY done so, you advise member banks in your district of t,,ne° cf Board's ruling contained in X-7001, calling attenrei-,'° necessity for obtaining permits covering correspondent 114a4Lionships with dealers oven in connection with dealing in or siderwl'iting types of securities described in X-7901, and cond" a dvisability of obtaining correction by newspapers of any the ca•tion given by their reports of the Board's ruling, such as ' contained in the Lew York Times for May 18, that a permit 1144 necessary in cases of this kind." P o e Approved, together with a telegram, also dated Juno 8, 1934, and approved by throe members of the Board, to Governor Calkins quoting the above telegram to :.r. Case and stating the Board will be glad to receive any further information Governor Calkins may have regarding the matter. Letter dated June 60 1934, approved by five members of the -32to Mr. Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve 88.1*Of l'ew York, referring to the application of Yr. Emil C. Miller Under section 32 of the Banking Act of 1933 for a permit to serve at the same time as a director of the Bank of Nutley, Nutley, New JerIseY, ma as a member of Fahnestock & Company, New York, New York, and 8tEtti31g. that, in view of the principles stated in the Board's letter Of April 13, 1934 (X-7660), it appears that the firm of Fahnestock 411113"7 should not be regarded as engaged primarily in the business Of Purchasing, selling, or negotiating securities within the meaning crsection 32; that, therefore, a permit covering the relationship deeoribed in the application is not necessary; and that, accordingly, 11111"8 there to are other facts which the agent believes should be called the at tention of the Board, it is suggested that he so advise the 414340a/it. Approved. Boerd, Letter dated June 6, 1934, approved by six members of the -0 Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank lork, reading as follows: -,, "The Federal a Reserve Board has under consideration the apvcati on of Mr. Romell S. Nichols under Section 32 of the 8.411k ciiing Act of 1933 for a permit to serve at the same time as tre c rector of Peoples hank 6: Trust Company of Tiestfield, and as asurer and director of Bankers Title & Mortgage Guaranty °111118137*/ both of Westfield, New Jersey. ,In a letter dated January 8, 1934, from the applicant to it Lillistin, a copy of which is annexed to the application, lit:131)081*s that Bankers Title et; Mortgage Guaranty Company is fiorjer4itted to sell either guaranteed mortgages or guaranteed e ege1Par ticipations, but is engaged at the present time in -7cr ng to reduce its assets to cash in order to pay off its 171E3 6/8/34 -33- "liabilities; that it is not seekinv; any new business nor likely to Sell anything but title insurance; that in the future the company may lend money on mortgages which, in turn, will be sold, ti10 company retaining a percentage of the mortgage interest as a ervice charge, but that there is no immediate prospect of such uusiness. Also, the dealer has submitted a statement which is annexed to the application and which stetes that the business of said Bankers Title Mortgage Guaranty Company does not customarilY include the underwriting, flotation and distribution of saourities or participations in such transactions. "In view' of the above information, the Board believes that the bankers Title Lortgage Guaranty Company is not 'engaged Primarily in the business of purchasing, selling or negotiating securities' within the scope of Section 32. Therefore, a permit coverinE the relationship described in this application is not 8 ; 2 di=1 1,e appreciated if you will advise the applic "If, in the future, the Bankers Title & Mortgage Guaranty .c.T.Pany resuPias the making of loans on mortgages, in accordance rith the "'by thjr. plan outlined by the applicant the relationship covered application may come within the scope of Section 32, defluin on whether the Bankers aitle & Mortgage Guaranty Company 2-110s securities as a part of the plan. In this connection refer' lice is made to the Board's letter of April 13, 1934 (X-7859). also rotod that the appll.cart is director and president , otandard Securities Corporation of T.estfield, New Jerse'y, h:Tield -eirr Jersey, the business of which is described as a the 1 0" mPanY. It appears that said corporation was formed by licant and his wife to hold their respective property; that the stock aPis aimed in equal shares by the applicant, his dol e and the : aPplicant's three children; that the corporation oval not buy or sell securities or other property except for its zerrba.ccount, and then, only for the purpose of chanr;ing an investOther ZIld that since 1929 the corporation has sold no securitdes share Ilan 87 shares of stock in one corporation and twenty-odd tiof another, both of which were sold in open market. lette„, 4 ViM of the foregoing and in the liptht of the Board's &floss '°f becember 22, 1933 (X-7739) it is apparent that the busts notof.`'tandard within the Securities Corporation of Westfield, New Jersey, necessary purview of Secticn 32. Therefore, it is not for 14r. Nichols to file coveri an application under Section 32 ,"&,. his services with the last named corporation and Peoples xrust C ompany of .estfield. I 3 Lpproved. Letter dated June 6, 1934, approved by five members of the to r 4.1's Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve 17 6/8/34 -34- Bealkof Chicago, readins as follows: , "Receipt is acknowledged of Mr. Young's letter dated Yay 2us 1934, regarding the application of Kr. Christian J. Golee under Section 32 of the Banking Act of 1933 for a permit to ” I've at the same time as an officer and director of the Evans1 2n Trust and -javinss Bank, Evanston, Illinois, and as an of-Lleoriond diroctor of Smart C: Golee, Inc., Evanston, Illinois. from the information contained in Mr. Young's a PPeal's lette'rl,t:d from the copies of the notes and the trust deed intherein, that the notes handled by Smart & Golee, Inc., ere not 'securities' within the meaning of Section 32. In this nneotion reference is made to the Board's letter of April 16, 1934 (X-7866). _ Accordinc.,1y, the Board has decided that no permit is re71:tlred under Section 32 in connection with the applicant's seree to the above-rentioned institutions. It will be appreciated You mill so advice Lr. Golee." Approved. Letter to Ur. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Ite erve Ba nkof Chicago, reading as follows: 1034, Iteceipt is acknowledged of Ir. Young's letter of May 22, regarding the application of Robert F. Garrettson for a rillit nder Section 32 of the Banking Act of 1953 to serve as an Officer and director of The Lerchants National Bank and as 1:1 1 °fficer and director of R. F. Garrettson & Company, both of eitY, Indiann. Receipt is also acknowledged of the cztostatic copies of a letter dated May 16, 1934, from Mr. ci litt8on to 111r. Young, a form of mortgage and a form of prinlia llote and interest coupon, all of which were inclosed in lunz's letter. Es 6,21.:°111 an e:(amination of the photostatic copies submitted Cori , -4 '" of the instruments issued by Robert F. Garrettson cip4 ;111Y, in the course of its business, the mortgase and prin.and aPPear to be the usual type of real estate mortgage retllamortization note used in connection with a direct coupon' loan on in thestate- The document rhich is termed 'interest is inter: I_ ern' o a negotiable promissory note for the payment of f: the s on the 1 loan and apparently is customarily attached to riots for the of the corresponding amortization payment. The back thee bears a form of assignment, without recourse, and the notes which are secured thereby. cepari 'resi lY, a realY to place ait is the practice of Robert F. Garrettson! loan and as security therefor to take back estate mortrare , the e debt being evidenced by notes for r 1_720 6/8/34 "the payment of instalments of principal and interest, executed bY the mortgagor to The Ierchants National Bank of Lichian City, Indiana, as trustee. Subsequently, the mortgage and notes are assignadt a purchaser. s letter to you the applicant makes the falloving 'The mortgage notes or bonds that Robert F. Garrettson & Conr Pany dealt in were secured by first mortgages on individual Properties and were not in any sense certificates of particix:..issued in series against pools of mortgages held in tt phe T aPPlicant also states in his answer to question 1:o. 8 on CP-6 E. Form 99a that the dealer is not engaged primarily in the usilIcs of purchasinr, selling, or negotiating securities. , In the light of the foregoing, the board is of the opinion v4.uet he bond and mortgae notes submitl,ed by Mr. Garrettsen are '41°se arisinr; out of the ordinary type of direct loan on real ' ntate and are not 'securities' within the intendment of Section Ecnd should not be classified as 'securities' in determining who_ether an organization engared in dealing in such obligations °Illes,:ilithin the scope of that section. Shouldherefores unless ',here are other facts which you believe be that YOU brought to the attenticn of the Board, it is suggested notify the applicant that the relationships referred to : s 0141e first paragraph of this letter do not come within the Pe of Section 32 of the Banking Act of 1933." Approved. Letter dated June 6, 1934, approved by five members of the 1-$011rd, to 're Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve tkm, Of Chicago, reading as follows: nn,, e m dtate, Federal Reserve Board has received 14r. Young's , letter C, laY 25, 1934, regarding the C D. Knight, applications of C. nr;, and L. S. Stephens under Section 32 of the Actxig Il Bank1933 for permits authorizing them to serve at the as officers and/Or directors of the Lerchants National idllar=:s of the Lerchants National Investment ComIllinois. It is noted that Er. Knight his d thttt Zvere connection as trust officer of the bank, and on', h6 aPPlications of Er. Manning and Er. Stephens are the 4 3111,‘eIS to be "Fro considered. deed i the letters and copies of the notes and the trust haild141,10sed in Lr. Young's letter, it appears that the notes !zee , :Y the Merchants National Investment Company are not Ilrltles, within the meaninf, of Section 32. In this 1721 1 6/6/34 -36ft connection, reference is made to the Beard's letter of April 16, 1934 (X-7866). "The Board therefore agrees with Mr. Young's suggestion that no permits are reouired covering the relationships in clues1o• It 1 be appreciated if you will advise the applicants 000r dixigly." Approved. Letter to hir. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal ,ve Bank of Chicago, reading as follows: 11 The Board has given consideration to 1.1r. Young's letter °f Lay 14, 1934, replying to the Board's letter to you dated ,Pril 25, 1934 regardin the applications under Section 32 of the 1, Banking Act of 1933 of C. Roy cCanna, G. A. Uebele, S. I. PnardY, Fred .1. New, James li. lairphy, George A. Harper, E. C. Oann on 117 .1t,%‘:. L. LcCarthy to serve at the same time the Bank of Burl; Burlin-ton — gage iscon-ir and the Burliirton Loft— dt— Investment Company, Burlington, lisconsin. The Board has .80 examined the photostatic copy of Lisconsin First Mortgage uollateral Irust Bond issued by the Burlington Mortgage Invest4 11 11t Company and the photostatic copies of financial statements comPany for the years 1931, 1932 and 1933 which were el()the incod in Young's letter. W5 "It aPpears that the Burlington Mortgage Investment Company Curedincorrated for the purpose of furnishing investments seci, by first mortgages on local real estate; that the bonds bee issued by the company in denominations of y100 and ,500 each, bn7,?°uPens for the payment of interest semi-annually, and are i,11 °40 to c'Zt they bearer at the and of a period not exceeding six years; are issued in series not exceeding $50,000 and are sebY first mortgages on real estate totaling at least the to tile111(3unt. It further appears that the mortgages are allotted Particular series of bonds which they secure and are as1341,u, pr esumably by the mortgage company, to the Bank of trti ton and to lir. Harper, as co trustees,under a deed of executed for that purpose. It appears that the company ele al business other than has been here described. It is are no,_that the bonds are issued principally for sale locally, trRded'ireistered or listed on any exchange and are not actively !9 ste,Z Copiparli "td L c)nd. issued by ,he Burliton ng Mortgage Investment type sTPear to be obligations of that company and are not the -1- bond or t note y a usually riven by a borrower as evidence of bn acaLebtsecured martrage on real property. the mortPaytie„Ilken by the company are held in trust as security for the of the series of bands to which they have been allotted, 1_922 Particular bonds are not directly identified with particular n Tnnlocrrttggaar;gees,ore.d in this respect differ from the usual real estate , "On the basis of the foregoing, the Board bel'eves that the °ends which the Burlington Mortgage Investment Company issues c.ro 'securities' within the purview of Secticn 32, and that the company is 'engaged primarily in the business of purchasing, ?lling, or negotiating' such securities. Therefore it appears ,?at the relationships covered by these applications are of the 43-rldNivihich Section 32 was designed to terminate. Accordingly, it is suggested that you notify the applicants that the Board is unable to find that it would be not inCO mPat With the public interest to issue permits under Sec32 to serve the Bank of Burlington, and the Burlington :pgage Investment Company. It will be appreciated if you mill the Board what steps the applicants intend to take in Or bring the relationships referred to in the first paraPh of this letter into conformiti, with the requirements of that section." Z rerto Approved. Letter dated June 6, 1934, approved by five members of the board, t° Curtiss, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve LEtht. cf Boston, reading as follows: "'this refers to your letter of May 4, 1934, and previous endence relative to the application of Mr. Julius G. Day 2r, a Permit under tie Clayton Act covering his services as dic t'cr of the National Bank, Derby, Connecticut, and the Lew Haven Bank, N.B.A., New Haven, connecticut, and as of the Birmnghalouste 1)erby, Connecticut. It is Your 7 :e nl.e ttcl ei x :t a n a lch 20, 1934, Mrs. Frances .102:b;nfer was appointed to fill the vacancy caused by Mr. s failure to qualify as a director of the Birmingham Eaof 41nk, and that therefore Mr. Day is no longer a director isireh bank. C onsequently, the permit issued to him on Lay 2, the ,Tfor Permission to serve at the sane time as a director of Natirw "Haven Bank, N.E.A., and as director of the Birmingham Bank is no longer necessary. 4 diro iS also noted that you state that Mr. Day was elected held -c'cr of the pew Haven Bank, N.B.A. at its annual meeting that he has never taken the oath of ofYb9ank1934; advised you that they do not intend to have str_ 1Lke the oath of office but hope to appoint two or three directors in connection with a program of rehabilitation; 411,11 1111 his vacancy within the next few months. In this ei T t M/ 1 44 IIc onnection, your attention is invited to Section 5145 of the Revised Statutes, relating to the tenure of office of directors Of national banks, which provides in part that 'The directors shall hold office for one year, and until their successors are elected ard have qualified'. In construing this provision the TruPreme Court of the United States in the case of Bowerman v. uamner, 250 Ti. S. 504, 515, held that in the absence of evidence that a director resigned or refused to qualify when reelected he continued to be a director notwithstanding the fact that he did qualify or take the oath of office. It is observed that Li-. -413-Y was a director of the bank for 18 years immediately precedhis election in January, 1934, and in view of the foregoing is clear that he must be regarded as a director of the New tlaven Bank, N.E.A. until he takes some affirmative action either 0J r(T.ning or refusing to qualify. deficin these circumstances you are requested to ascertain titely whether L.r. Day has resigned or refused to qualify as : dir.ector and if not advise the Board of your reasons for recon,r;u1ng that his Clayton Act application covering his service as Illloriector of the New Haven Bank, N.B.A., and as trustee of the rust Company should not be granted." Approved. Letter dated June 7, 1934, approved by five members of the 13( eL, t an aPPlicant for a permit under the Clayton Act, advising ot aPProval of his application as follows: DeC. Kessler, for permission to serve at the sam time as a direct or of The Alabama National Bank of Montgomery, Montgomery, lalama, and as a director of The Citizens and Peoples ' t41.1-ik of National Pensacola, Pensacola, Florida. lipproved, together with a letter, also dated June 7, 1934, and approved 137 five mem, 1Ders of the Board, to Mr. Newton, Federal leserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, reading as follow: h I nere is rellnit . inclosed for your files a copy of the Clayton Act 3-sued by the 10..., Board to 1Jr. .:i. DeC. Kessler, of Lontgomery, ;Z 1,10:Aaa, to serve as director of The Alabama National Bank of aald rierYA Liontgomery, Alabama, and as director of The Citizens es National Bank of Pensacola, Pensacola, Florida. Iisca1411 considering this application it was noted thattr;1 bokrd 0 , attended only two of the twen4ve -sen meetings o the 1 directors of The Citizens and Peoples l';atienal Bank of 1_72A 6/8/3 -39"Pensacola held during the past two years. In granting the permit the Board took into consideration the fact that the applicant had been a director of both banks for many years, and also that there were no unfavorable factors other than his poor attendance at the directors' meetings of the Pensacola bank. A satisfactory a ttendanc e at directors' meetings is necessary for the proper disharge of directors' duties, and it is with the expectation that Kessler will improve his attendance that the Board has gmnted the permit. In this connection it is suggested that you e4deavor, in cooperation with the Chief National Bank Examiner your district, to bring about the desired result. "The Board also desires that when you submit your reconmendaas a result of your annual review of this permit, you report 1111Y as to the applicant's attendance at directors' aleetings." Letter dated June 7, 1934, approved by five members of the 130arci, to vLIcClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve 14inic Ko 4sas City, readily' as follows: "There are to Lir. inclosed copies of the Clayton Act permit issued co ugh C -:ih iteford coveri covering his service as officer of The of Thmm?rcial National Bank of Kansas City, Kansas, and director G First by National Bank of Osawatomie, Kansas, for transmittal 2 t ° lArs %iteford and the two banks, together with a copy -u, your files. to lin aPproving this application consideration has been given fajour statement that the applicant keeps in touch with the afille,r8 of The Fir st i:ational ate with Ba Bank of Osawatomie by frequent meethis brother who is the activeoffice ,although he has /30,ne d, d only one directors' meeting in the past two years. The re'o'0-2eels, har/ever, that a director should have a satisfactory ficel. of di scharging the duties and responsibilities of his ofb :I_PcIrticipatinp- in the management and operations of the ugh attendance at directors' meetins; and when transt0 that b Boe,rdYou inform hiteford his copy of this permit, it is desired him of the Board's views in this matter. The al reoultso desires that when you submit your recommendation as a to °f Your annual review of this permit you report 194.4 fully as 1,"hiteford's attendance at directors' meetings during .3e.r\re 0" Letter to tank Approved. L:oClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal of Kansas City, reading as follows: ”„ 'here n, ---"e inclosed copies of the Clayton Act permit issued 6/8/34 -40_ to Lr. W. E. Hooker covering his service as director and ofof The Farmers National Bank of .ak City, Oklahoma, and The First State Bank of Camar,,o Oklahoma, for transmittal by you to 4r. Hecker and the two banks, together with a copy for your files. In considering lir. Hooker's application it vs noted that , 1 attended one of the twenty-one directors' meetings of The ilrst State Bank held during the past two years and that you ated that he was irregular in attendance of meetings or The flirst State Bank but confers weekly with his brother, P. S. locker, the managing director. in the circumstances, the Board has granted the permit in order to avoid any unnecessary misunderstanding by the coLnamity ,1ich might prove detrimental to the best interests of the banks. 1,' ,Le Board feels, however, that a director should have a satis,I;Ictory record of discharging the duties and responsibilities of °ffioe by participating in the management and operations of bank through attendance at tank directors' meetings, and, when tlia2smting to hr. Hocker his copy of this permit, it is desired a 'aL, you inform him of the Beard's views in this matter. The _°ard also desires that when you submit your recommendation as a bt _reault of your annual review of this permit you report fully to nr :locker's attendance at directors' moetin;s during 1934' .11 1 71 J.1.:)proved. Letters to applicants for permits under the Clayton Act, adof approval of their applications as follows: ii°mor L. Skeels, for permission to serve at the same time ; 0 a director of The Peoples Lational Lank of Barre, Barre, VerL;0 : 11.t aS a director and officer of tae 1.1ontpe11er 1.ational Bank, 80,11.'43°11er, Vermont, and as a director and officer of the Ludlow 71/k;s Bank and Trust Company, Ludlow, Vermont. 14r. 2d ari a ,Car L. Anderson, for permission to serve at the same time cori uirecter and officer of the Coahona County Bank Trust thePTIY, Clarksdale, Mississippi, as a director and officer of re ank °f Lula, Lula, Lississippi, and as a director of the r;ellnecsoemPhis bran ch of the Federal ReserveBank of St. Louis, Memphis, Lr. R. j ' Mann, for permission 1.o serve at the same time as a cia director and officer of The Clark County :ational Bank of Clark, ta.t ls. ',6°1.1th Dakota, and as a director and officer of The First ,Jank of Brewnton, Brown-Lon, lannosota. vire " for permission to serve at the same time as 1726 6/8/34 -41- !n, officer of The Commercial National Bank of Kansas City, Kansas itY, Kansas, and as a director of The State Bank of Bern, Born, 4ansas. Approved. There were then presented the following applications for 1144 '08 in stock of Federal reserve banks: A l ications fo ORIGINAL Stook: L EItrict la 1,400 04o irst „ Forest and Parmors National Banic of City, Forest City, Pennsylvania rirst National Bank of Williamsburg, Ifilliamsburg, Pennsylvania District 0• 10. e CltY National Bank in David City, D471(1 City, Nebraska Shares 69 36 105 36 Total 36 141 lioation for ADDITIONAL Stock: e First National Bank and Trust Company of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, South Dakota 129 129 Approved. Thereupon the meeting adjourned. fa°111:)11-12 4 -ecretary. vecit