View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

978
A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
SYstem was held in Washington on Friday, June 28, 1946, at 10:30 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Szymczak
Draper
Evans

Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Hammond, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Morrill, Special Adviser
Mr. Thurston, Assistant to the Chairman
Mr. Paulger, Director of the Division
of Examinations
Mr. Vest, General Counsel
Mr. Thomas, Director of the Division of
Research and Statistics
Mr. Leonard, Director of the Division of
Personnel Administration
Mr. Bethea, Director of the Division of
Administrative Services
As stated in the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Gover4°1's of the Federal Reserve System held on June 27, 1946, Mr. Vardaman
Was absent on official business.
Chairman Eccles stated that Mr. Ransom probably would be away
Washington during the month of July and that he planned to be
absent for most of the next two weeks. In these circumstances, he suggested that the Board elect a member to act as Chairman pro tern whenthe Chairman was absent during that time.
Accordingly, Mr. Szymczak was
elected to serve as Chairman pro tern
in the absence of the Chairman during
the two weeks' period.
There were then presented telegrams to Messrs. Treiber and

kair, Secretaries




of the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and

979
6/28/46

-2-

Cleveland, Mr. Leach, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond,
11r. Dillard, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Mr.
Stewart, Secretary of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Mr. Peyton,
President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Mr. Woolley, Vice
President and Cashier of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Mr.
Gilbert, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, and Mr.
Mange's, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,
stating that the Board approves the establishment without change by the
Federal Reserve Banks of St. Louis and Kansas City on June 22, by the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on June 25, and by the Federal
4serve Banks of New York, Cleveland, Richmond, Chicago, St. Louis,
eapolis, and Dallas, on June 27, 1946, of the rates of discount and
Pu rchase in their existing schedules.
Approved unanimously.
There was a discussion of the material to be included in the
statement being prepared for submission to the National Labor Relations
13°ard in support of the position that the National Labor Relations Act
Was not applicable to the Federal Reserve Banks, and Mr. Vest raised

the question whether the matter should be taken up with the Treasury
th the thought that the Secretary or Under Secretary of the Treasury
W°111d want to express to the Labor Relations Board the views of that
clePartment as to the importance of the fiscal agency operations concilleted by the Federal Reserve Banks and to concur in the position of

the

Board of Governors that the Federal Reserve Banks were not subject




980
—3—

6/28/46

to the National Labor Relations Act.
This question was discussed, and it
was agreed unanimously that a draft of
statement on the matter should be prepared for informal submission to Secretary
Snyder with a copy to Mr. Bartelt, Fiscal
Assistant Secretary, and that Chairman
Eccles would call Mr. Snyder on the telephone this afternoon and tell him that the
statement would be sent over early next
week and that he (Chairman Eccles) or in
his absence Mr. Szymczak would like to
discuss the matter with the Secretary as
early as possible.
In connection with the above matter, Chairman Eccles stated
that, in

accordance with the action taken at the meeting of the Board

°4 June 25, 1946, he conferred on June 26 with Mr. Hutchings, International President of the Office Employes International Union, with
l'espect to the efforts of the union to be designated as the bargaining
agent for the employees of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and had
8tated that, for the reasons which would be included in the statement
to be submitted to the National Labor Relations Board, the Board of
Governors was of the opinion that the National Labor Relations Act did
lic3t apply to the Federal Reserve Banks.

He also said that because of

the meeting of the Board of Governors with the executive committee of
the Federal Advisory Council there was not sufficient time to complete
the conference and that he was to see Mr. Hutchings again.
Before this meeting each member of the Board present was fur- a
copy of a memorandum dated June 26, 1946, from the Personnel
C°18naittee with respect to the action to be taken to increase salaries




981
6/28/46

of

-4
-

employees of the Board in conformity with the Federal Employees' Pay

Act of 1946 which was to become effective on July 1, 1946.

The Board's

counsel had held in the past that in view of Section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act the provisions of such pay acts were not believed to be
legally applicable to the Board, but as a matter of policy it had been
the practice of the Board to follow them closely. The memorandum
l'eeommended that salaries of the Board's employees be increased in con—
formity with the provisions of the Pay Act by 14 per cent or $250 in
each case, whichever was the greater, except that no salary would be
itcreased above the rate of $10,000 per annum or above the maximum of
the applicable salary scale as increased to conform to the Pay Act. If
this recommendation were approved the 21 employees in the following
er°uPs would not receive any increase or would receive an increase of
lees than 14 per cent:
(1)

Employees whose present salaries were in excess
of the new maximum salaries for their positions
and who would receive no increase:
Present
Salary

New Maximum
for Grade

$5,810

$4,902.00

Clerk—Stenographer-Legal

3,640

3,397.20

Secretary--R & S

3,640

3,397.20

F.R. Examiner--Exams.

8,225

6,862.80*

Clerk—Stenographer-Legal

3,420

3,397.20

Title and
Division
C. S.
DYer, Sara A.

Ilicks,

L. C.

11°e11, J.

C.

Stone, A. H.

Asst. F.R. Examiner-Exams.

* If the position were classified.




982
6/28/46

5(2)

Assistant Federal Reserve Examiners obtained for
temporary oeriods from Federal Reserve Banks who
would receive no increase:

Name

Present
Salary

Title

Robinson, D.
C.

Asst. F.R. Examiner$4,190

Schumacher, V. P.

Asst. F.R. Examiner

5,000*

New Maximum
for Grade
$4,525.80
3,773.40

* The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago reimburses the Board for
$2,000 of this salary.

(3)

Name
---.....

Employees who would receive increases in the
amount shown below (to the new maximums of their
positions) but less than 14 per cent of their
present salaries:
Increase to new max.
Present New max. Amount % of presTitle and
ent salary
Salary for grade
Division

Paber, Philip D. Laborer—Adm.
Services

$1,800 42,020.00 4220.00

12.2

Gardner, William Chauffeur—Adm.
1,920
Services

2,168.28 248.28

12.9

11°I'leY, Michael Laborer—Adm.
Services

1,800

2,020.00 220.00

12.2

Cook--Adm.
Services

1,920

2,168.28 248.28

12.9

M. Under Clerk-Bank Ops.

1,920

2,168.28 248.28

12.9

Jesse D. Messenger--R & S 1,920

2,168.28 248.28

12.9

Messenger-R &S

2,020

2,168.28 148.28

7.3

F.R. Examiner-5,390
Exams.

5,905.20 515.20

9.5

Asst. to Di-rector--R & S

5,905.20 515.20

9.5

Emma
Skitm
Carl

Carter
A.

Beverly

George E.

Le

,e4, Marie
tutler




5,390

983
6/28/46

-6-

Title and
Division

Name
Moore, A. A.

Reeves
D.

Dorothy

Supr.,Settlement
& Currency Section--Bank Ops.$4,300

Iilek, J. J.

4,525.80 $225.80

5.2

Sec. to Mr.Young
3,310

3,397.20

87.20

2.6

3,090

3,397.20

307.20

9.9

Opr.,Duplicating
Devices--Adm.
1,960
Services

2,168.28 208.28

10.6

Supply Clerk-Adm. Services

2,394.00

228.00

10.5

S
tewart, Phyllis Sec. to Mr.
E.
Nelson--Adm,
Services
T
ruehart, Lynwood

Increase to new max.
Present New max. Amount % of present salary
Salary for grade

2,166

The recommendation of the Personnel Committee also contemplated:
1.

That the increases will apply to:
(a) The salary as of June 30, 1946, plus any individual
increase approved prior to July 1, 1946, to become
effective as of that date; and
(b) The salary of any employee whose appointment was
approved prior to July 1, 1946, but which does not
become effective before that date.

2.

That in conformity with the Pay Act specifically increasing the rates of employees in Civil Service grades CPC-9
and 10, the salaries of the Board's two mechanics coming
within the comparable grade, Messrs. Lindamood and
Glotfelty, shall be increased U220 each, i.e., to $3,530
and $3,420, respectively, and that the 14 per cent increase shall apply to the salaries as so adjusted.

3.

That the salary of the substitute maid, Amy French, be
increased from $5.55 to $6.50 per day.

4.

That recommendation will be submitted later with respect
to the salary of the substitute nurse in view of questions currently under consideration with respect to the
classification of nurses.




984
6/28/46
5. That in the case of one charwoman, Mrs. Boyd, who at her
request is working a 7-hour day instead of an 8-hour day,
her salary will continue to be computed on the present
basis of 7/8 of the full time salary, which basic salary
would now be increased to conform with the Pay Act.

6. That the increases shall not be considered as applying to
the fees paid to the three consultants, Drs. Goldenweiser,
Hansen, and Haberler.

The memorandum contained the further statement that the Personnel Committee intended to give further consideration as a personnel matter to

the cases of the five employees who would be receiving salaries in exCess

of the new maximums for their respective grades.
The recommendation of the Personnel
Committee was approved unanimously.
At this point Messrs. Wilkes and Sloan, Federal Reserve Exam-

iners, entered the room and Mr. Bethea withdrew.
Mr. Paulger stated that sometime ago applications were received
fl'om the Seattle Trust & Savings Bank, Seattle, Washington, for permissic3n to establish branches at Burien City and between 180th and 185th
Streets on Aurora Avenue outside the city limits of Seattle, Washington,

and that President Clerk of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,
Who Was concerned about the increase in the number of banking offices
gt national banks in relation to State banks in the district, had suggested that the Federal bank supervisory agencies in Washington issue
instructions to their respective representatives in the Twelfth Federal
Reserve District on the policy to be followed in the future with respect




985

6/28/46

-8--

to the chartering of new banks and the opening of additional branches.
Mr. Paulger said that he had discussed the matter with Mr. Sailor,
Chief of the Division of Examinations of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, and Mr. Folger, Chief National Bank Examiner for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, who agreed that the representatives of the three supervisory agencies should confer with each
Other and the State Bank Supervisor in the case of each new application
and should then send their recommendations to Washington, but that this
Procedure had not been satisfactory to Mr. Clerk, and that apparently
What he desired was a directive from the three Federal agencies to
their respective representatives in the District to confer in each
instance and determine whether the new banking office should be a new
tational bank, a new State bank, or a branch of a national bank or
State bank, as the case might be.
Mr. Paulger went on to say that the Office of the Comptroller
°f the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation were not
to issue such instructions and that it was not believed that
811°11 an arrangement would be satisfactory.

He added that, although

there had been a long exchange of correspondence with Mr. Clerk about
the matter, Mr. Clerk had insisted on some such arrangement being made.
P°11awing receipt from Mr. Clerk, Mr. Paulger said, of a letter dated
j/ine 21, 1946, with further reference to the two branches of the




986
6/28/46

-9-

Seattle Trust & Savings Bank, he took the matter up with Messrs. Sailor
and Polger again and wired Mr. Clerk stating that the two offices saw
no objection to the establishment of the two branches and asking for
his recommendation, and that Mr. Clerk had replied by wire as follows:
"Are we to assume that the three Federal agencies have
agreed upon a procedure wherein future applications for
branches of national bank, of State member bank, or of nonmember insured bank, or applications for charters for new
national banks andewlications for insurance for new State
banks will be subject in each instance to joint consideration of the three Federal agencies and bank commissioner of
the State affected and that Comptroller and Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation have so advised field representative
and instructed them to cooperate?"
Mr. Paulger made the further statement that the matter had been
discussed with Mr. Vardaman before he left the city and that he favored
aPProving the applications of the Seattle Trust & Savings Bank for the
establishment of the two new branches in accordance with our usual
elastom in handling such matters.
The members of the Board were in agreement that the arrangement
Proposed by Mr. Clerk was not a satisfactory one, that it would not be
Possible for the three Federal bank supervisory agencies in Washington
to adopt a policy such as Mr. Clerk had suggested, and that each
11313lication should be considered as it was received on the basis of the
facts involved and considered in the light of the recommendations of
the State Bank Supervisor and the local representatives of the three




987
6/28/46

-10-

Federal agencies.
At the conclusion of the discussion,
the following letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco with respect
to the establishment by the Seattle Trust
& Savings Bank of the two branches was approved unanimously and Mr. Vardaman was to
be requested, upon his return from New
York, to talk to Mr. Clerk over the telephone for the purpose of working out the
matter of procedure on the basis of the
views expressed by the Board at this meeting:
"Reference is made to your letter of April 13, 1946, and
subsequent correspondence regarding the request of the Seattle
Trust and Savings Bank, Seattle, Washington, for approval of
the establishment of branches at Burien City, Washington, and
between 180th and 185th Streets on Aurora Avenue, outside the
City limits of Seattle.
"While no recommendation has been submitted by the Reserve Bank the Board of Governors has noted the condition and
management of the applying bank, the approval of the State
Superintendent of Banks and the favorable recommendation of
the examiner for the Reserve Bank who investigated the matter.
It is also advised that the Comptroller of the Currency and
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will interpose no
objection to the establishment of the branches as proposed.
In the circumstances, the Board approves the establishment and
Operation of branches in Burien City, Washington, and between
180th and 185th Streets on Aurora Avenue, outside the City of
Seattle, by the Seattle Trust and Savings Bank, Seattle,
Washington, with the understanding that Counsel for the Reserve Bank will review and satisfy himself as to the legality
of all steps taken to establish the branches."
In accordance with the action taken at the meeting of the Board
°4 May 7, 1946, additional information had been obtained in connection
with the application of the Bank of America National Trust & Savings
Association of San Francisco to establish branches at Manila,
Philippine Islands, and Shanghai, China, as follows:




988
6/28/46

-11-

"(1) A letter dated June 5 had been received from High
Commissioner McNutt which contained a comprehensive review
of the banking needs of the Philippines and a recommendation
for approval of the application to establish a branch at
Manila.
"(2) While the State Department had not formally replied to the Board's letter asking for an expression of its
views, a draft of a proposed reply has been cleared informally by representatives of the Department which would
state that the establishment of direct banking relations
between the West Coast and China and the Philippines would
appear likely to further the commerce of the United States
and that the Department perceived no objection to the
approval of the applications.
"(3) Examiner Goodman's memorandum of May 13 expressed
the view that the establishment of the proposed Manila
branch should be helpful to the Philippines and the commerce
of the United States.
"(4) The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco had
transmitted with a letter dated May 18 additional data of a
satisfactory nature from Bank of America in support of its
applications to establish the two branches.
"(5) Chairman Martin and Vice Chairman Gaston of the
Export-Import Bank had expressed the opinion informally that
the opening of the branches should receive positive encouramient."
Mr. Paulger also reported that he had telephoned Deputy Comptroller of the Currency Upham informing him that the Board had asked
for and obtained the information referred to above relating to the
establishment of the proposed branches, and that Mr. Upham voiced no
O bjection to a favorable consideration of the applications and stated
that he would inform the Comptroller of the Currency of the substance
(311 the conversation.
Chairman Eccles stated that this matter had been discussed by




989
6/28/46

-12-

same of the members of the Board at luncheon on June 26 at which time
Mr. Vardaman stated that, on the basis of the additional information
that had been obtained, if the other members of the Board favored

approval of the applications he would join in such approval.
The applications were discussed in
the light of the experience of other
American banks with foreign branches,
after which, upon motion by Mr. Szymczak,
the following orders were adopted by
unanimous vote, with the understanding
that they would be sent to the Federal
Reserve Bank of San Francisco for delivery to Bank of America National Trust
& Savings Association, and that the
Comptroller of the Currency would be advised by letter of the Board's action:
"ORDER
June 28, 1946
"IiiiREREAS Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, San Francisco, California, has made application to
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, pursuant to the provisions of section 25 of the Federal Reserve
Act, for permission to establish a branch at Manila, Commonwealth of the Philippines; and
"WHEREAS it appears that the said bank may properly be
authorized to establish a branch at Manila, Commonwealth of
the Philippines;
"NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, San Francisco, California, be and it hereby is authorized to establish a branch
at Manila, Commonwealth of the Philippines, upon the condition that unless the branch hereby authorized is actually
established and opened for business on or before July 1, 1947,
and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
advised in writing that the branch has been so established
and opened for business, all rights hereby granted as to such
branch shall be deemed to have been abandoned and the authority hereby granted as to it shall automatically terminate;
but, if the branch shall have been established and opened for
business on or before said date and the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System shall have been so advised in
writing, the said bank may operate and maintain the same subject to the provisions of section 25 of the Federal Reserve Act."




990
6/28/46

-13"ORDER
June 28, 1946

"WHEREAS Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, San Francisco, California, has made application
to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, pursuant to the provisions of section 25 of the Federal Reserve
Act, for permission to establish a branch at Shanghai, China;
and
"WHEREAS it appears that the said bank may properly be
authorized to establish a branch at Shanghai, China;
"NOW, THERLF0hE IT IS ORDERED that Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, San Francisco, California, be and it hereby is authorized to establish a branch
at Shanghai, China, upon the condition that unless the branch
hereby authorized is actually established and opened for business on or before July 1, 1947, and the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System advised in writing that the branch
has been so established and opened for business, all rights
hereby granted as to such branch shall be deemed to have been
abandoned and the authority hereby granted as to it shall
automatically terminate; but, if the branch shall have been
established and opened for business on or before said date
and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
shall have been so advised in vxiting, the said bank may
Operate and maintain the same subject to the provisions of
section 25 of the Federal Reserve Act."
Messrs. Paulger, Leonard, Wilkes, and Sloan withdrew from the
Meeting at this point.
Unanimous approval was then given
to the following telegrams to Mr. Knoke,
Vice President of the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York:
"In compliance with the request in your telegram of June 27
the Board approves the opening and maintenance of an account on your books for and in the name of the Banco de
Guatemala subject to the usual terms and conditions upon
Which you maintain accounts for foreign central banks. It
is understood that you will in due course offer participation in this account to the other Federal Reserve Banks."
"In compliance with the request in your telegram of June 27
the Board approves the opening and maintenance of an account on your books for the Bank of Siam subject to the




991
6/28/46

-14-

Usual terms and conditions upon which you maintain accounts
for foreign central banks. It is understood that you will
offer participation in this account to the other Federal Reserve Banks."

"

Chairman Eccles stated that, in accordance with the understanding at the meetings of the Board on February 1 and June 18, 1946, he
told Mr. Leland, when he was in Washington on the latter date, of the
views of the Board with respect to his continuing as Chairman and Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and stated
that the Board did not plan to redesignate him as Chairman and Federal
Reserve Agent after the expiration of his present designation on
December 31,
1946.

He also said that he advised Mr. Leland that the

Board had come to the conclusion that, inasmuch as men in his position
in the academic field should have complete freedom to express views
which might be in conflict with the views of the System, members of
faculties of universities should not be designated as Chairmen and
Pederal Reserve Agents at the Federal Reserve Banks, particularly when
their specialty was the field of money and banking or fiscal and
financial matters, as there was too much opportunity for conflict between

their academic activities and their positions at the Federal

Reserve Banks.

He added that Mr. Leland did not say what he proposed

to do or whether he would resign as Class C director and Chairman and
Federal Reserve Agent.
Chairman Eccles then referred to the action taken at the meeting of the Board on June 18, 1946, in connection with the blanket




992
6/28/46

-15-

participation agreement program of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and stated that he had discussed the matter with Mr. Snyder who
said that he was opposed to the Corporation's program, but that it was
the least undesirable of the available alternatives, and that it was
expected that the activity would shortly be substantially curtailed.
Chairman Eccles also mentioned that Mr. Bernstein, Acting
Chief of the Research Division of the International Monetary Fund, had
called to say that the Fund planned to have about one-third of its
staff consist of American citizens, that it was hoped that these
individuals could be the very best qualified individuals available,
and that the Fund would like to employ Messrs. Gardner and Triffin and
Miss Bourneuf from the Board's Division of Research and Statistics and
Possibly three others from the staff of the Board and the Federal Reserve Banks.

Chairman Eccles said he told Mr. Bernstein why it would

be preferable for the Fund to look to the State and Treasury Departments
for personnel, as those departments had had large numbers of people
engaged in war work that was being terminated, whereas the Board had a
small staff which it should retain in view of the important responsibilities of the National Advisory Council of which the Chairman of the
131°ard of Governors was a member.
Mr. Thomas said that he and Mr. Knapp, Assistant Director of
the Division of Research and Statistics, had been discussing the matter
a.nd that it was felt that the Board might feel obligated to let Miss
804rneuf go to the staff of the Fund.




He also stated that it was

993
6/28/46

—16—

expected that the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
would ask for Mr. Dembitz, Economist in the Board's Division of Re—
search and Statistics.
Mr. Szymczak said that Mr. Triffin had been offered a position
on the staff of the International Monetary Fund in charge of exchange
controls and that he would like to accept the offer.
There was discussion of the desirability of giving leave of
absence to any members of the Board's staff who were employed by the
Fund or Bank, and it was the consensus that if any of them left the
Boardts staff it should be on a basis of resignation, which would re—
lieve the Board of any obligation to take them back later in the event
their positions were filled and there was no place on the Board's staff
for them.

No conclusions were reached.

At this point Messrs. Hammond, Vest, and Thomas withdrew from
the meeting, and the action with respect to each of the matters herein—
after referred to was then taken by the Board:
The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Governors of the
l'ederal Reserve System held on June 27, 1946, were approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated June 26, 1946, from Mr. Bethea, Director of
the

Division of Administrative Services, recommending that the appoint—

ment of Mrs. Naomi Robertson, cafeteria helper in that Division, be ex—
tended on a temporary basis for a period of two months, without change
her present salary of $1,440 per annum, effective July 2, 1946,
excePt for such salary increase as may be granted effective July 1 to




994
6/28/46

-17-

conform with the 1946 Pay Act.

The memorandum also stated that it was

not Contemplated that Mrs. Robertson would became a member of the Federal Reserve retirement system during the period of her temporary
employment.
Approved unanimously.
Letter for the signature of Chairman Eccles to Er. Ruml, Chair'
Ilan of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, prepared in accordance with
the action taken at the meeting of the Board on June 4, 1946, and reading
as follows:
"This is to acknowledge your letter of May 16 with further reference to the arrangement under which Dr. Williams
has served as a part-time Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New
The Board does not accept the conclusion reflected in your letter to the effect that the
Board's only legal obligation or authority is confined to
Passing upon the amount of salary which the directors of the
New York Bank propose to pay to an officer.
"Your letter states that the directors of the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York feel 'that a serious matter of
Principle' is involved in this Board's decision not to continue to approve the payment of salary to Dr. Williams, on
the basis of his part-time service as a Vice President. As
the Board has made clear in previous correspondence on this
subject, this decision is based on a fundamental principle,
namely, that in an institution having the public character of the Federal Reserve System, salaried officers of
the Federal Reserve Banks should not have a divided allegiance, partly to the Federal Reserve Banks by which
they are employed and partly to outside institutions or
enterprises. This principle is basic in this matter. The
Board believes that what the directors of the New York Bank
are asserting is not a question of principle but one of
Prerogative. thile the Board does not believe that any useful purpose can be served by undertaking to debate, by letter
or otherwise, such a question of prerogative, the Board
cannot let this challenge go unanswered as a matter of record.
In the Board's opinion, its statutory obligation to approve
the compensation of officers and employees of the Federal Reserve Banks is not, and cannot reasonably be construed as
being, so narrow as to preclude the Board from taking into




995
6/28/46

-18-

"account not merely the amount of salary but the position and
the terms and conditions pertaining thereto under which it is
Proposed to pay the compensation. Any other construction
would render the duty of approving compensation a mere gesture
and a meaningless procedure.
"To take an extreme case, suppose that the directors and
Chief Executive Officer should conclude that 'the best economic
advice they can get in the best way they can get it' is to
engage on a part-time basis the services of an individual who
18, and intends to continue to be at the same time, a dealer
in Government securities or the manager of the bond portfolio
of an insurance company or of some other private institution.
It would hardly be reasonable to contend that the Board's
duty with reference to the compensation to be paid to such an
Individual should be abridged to the point of disregarding the
manifest impropriety of such a part-time arrangement. If the
Board's obligation were to be construed so narrowly, other
Provisions of the organic act of the Federal Reserve System
would have to be entirely disregarded, particularly the provisions relative to the Board's responsibility for exercising
general supervision over the Federal Reserve Banks, for removal, for cause, of officers of Federal Reserve Banks, and
for making all rules and regulations necessary to enable the
Board effectively to perform its functions. The Board, as the
agency of Congress charged with these responsibilities, must
exercise its best judgment even though it may disagree with
your board of directors. To do otherwise would amount to an
abdication of the Board's explicit statutory responsibilities.
"It seems to the Board unfortunate, to say the least,
that a question of prerogative should be injected into this
case, which should be determined on a reasonable basis either
by having Dr. Williams employed as a full-time officer of the
Bank as the Board has repeatedly suggested or, if that is
Impossible, then to have Dr. Williams retained in a consultative capacity on a per diem basis, under which he would
not serve as an officer of the Bank but could, of course, be
designated as an economic adviser or given some similar
designation that would not lead to confusion or misunderstanding as to his relationship with the Bank and the System.
"The Board cannot accept the opinion expressed in your
letter that any obligation has been created in the case of
Dr. Williams which stands in the way of these alternatives.
The Board's position has been well known both to you and to
the President of the Bank for some time past and the fact
that the situation has not been corrected has been due solely
to the delay on the part of the Bank in presenting to the
Board a satisfactory solution.




996
6/28/46

-19—

"The Board has heretofore deferred final action in the
hope that the Bank would succeed in working out an arrangement along the lines repeatedly stated during the past five
years in communications on this subject. We do not believe
that any useful purpose would be served by a further discussion of the question of policy and principle involved in
the position which the Board has taken.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Wiltse, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of June 26, 1946,
submitting the request of the Manufacturers and Traders
Trust Company, Buffalo, New York, for permission to
establish a branch at Cheektowaga, New York.
"In view of your recommendation, the Board of Governors approves the establishment and operation of a
branch in Cheektowaga, New York, by the Manufacturers
and Traders Trust Company, Buffalo, New York, provided
evidence of the formal approval of the appropriate State
authorities is submitted and with the understanding that
Counsel for the Reserve Bank will review and satisfy himself as to the legality of all steps taken to establish
the branch."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to "Roswell State Bank," Roswell, New Mexico, reading as
f
ollows:
"The Board is glad to learn that you have completed
all arrangements for the admission of your bank to membership in the Federal Reserve System and takes pleasure in
transmitting herewith a formal certificate of your membership.
"It will be appreciated if you will acknowledge receipt of this certificate."
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to the Presidents of all the Federal Reserve Banks,
l'eading as follows:




997
6/28/46

-20-

"Proviso added to section 8(a) of RegulationW by Amendment
No. 20 does not make inapplicable section 12(b) of the
regulation. Consequently, a credit to repair a house and in
addition to install a listed article cannot exceed cost of
repairs plus amount equal to cost of listed article minus
down payment required thereon by the regulation, and instalments in which credit is payable must be sufficiently large
to repay balance of cost of listed article within 12 months.
Cost of listed article would include installation charges
if any."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Gary M. Underhill, Executive Director of the
14)Pris Plan Bankers Association, Washington, D. C., reading as follows:
"Replying to your letter of May 23, 1946, which relates
to Regulation W and reiterates certain questions raised in
Your letter of May 1, 1946 because they were not explicitly
answered in our letter of May 22, 1946, we are still of the
opinion upon which our reply was based that these questions
do not logically arise from the relevant provisions of the
regulation.
"It has been and still is the view of the Board, as you
know, that a blanket exemption of credits to veterans from
the Federal consumer credit regulations would not only be
against the best interests of the whole country but
Particularly against the best interests of the veterans themselves. We fail to see how it is incongruous with this general position for the Board to recognize the essential
difference in the situation created by a special act of
Congress or a law enacted by a State which provides a guarantee for servicemen's loans within certain limitations and
requirements and therefore falls far short of leaving lenders
free to make such loans without control. On this basis, the
regulation is non-discriminatory because Federal and State
government-guaranteed loans receive the same treatment."




Approved unanimously.
Thereupon the .meeting

Secretary.