View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Friday, June 22, 1951.
PRESENT:

Mr. Martin, Chairman
Mr. Szymczak
Mr. Norton
Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary

Telegrams to the Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Philadelphia,
Chicago, St. Louis,Ard San Francisco stating that the Board approves the
establishment without change by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
cni June 19, by the Federal Reserve Bonk of St. Louis on June 20, and by

the Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Philadelphia,and Chicago on June 21,
Of

the rates of discount and purchase in their existing schedules.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated June 200 1951, from Mr. Bethea, Director of the

1)ivi5ion of Administrative Services, recommending an increase in the
bEtsie salary of George J. Russell, jr., Operator (Mimeograph) in that
DiNTisi°n, from $2,120 to $2,252 per annum, effective June 24, 1951.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated June 21, 1951, from Mr. Boothe, Assistant
bl*I'ector of the Division of Selective Credit Regulation, recommending
that the resignation of Miss Georgiana Benjamin, Clerk-Typist in that
tir143104, be accepted to be effective as of the close of business
trU/le 3.44 1951.




Approved unanimously.

6/22/51

-2Memorandum dated June 19, 1951, from Mr. Dembitz, Assistant

Director of the Division of International Finance, stating that Louis
G. Ficks, a Secretary in that Division, had submitted his application
for retirement to become effective July 1, 1951.
Noted.
Letter to Mr. Hill, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bunk
°f Philadelphia, reading as follows:
"In accordance with the request contained in
Your letter of June 20, 1951, the Board approves the
appointment of Joseph M. Case, at present an assistant
examiner, as an examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank
of Philadelphia.
"If the appointment is not made effective July 1,
as planned, please advise us."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Leedy, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of
411sats City, reading as follows:
"In view of the circumstances described in your
letter of June 19, 1951, the Board of Governors approves
the payment of salary to Miss Marjorie Hansen at the
rate of $3,924, per annum, which is $444 in excess of
the maximum established for the position Transcript
Clerk, Accounting Department, the position she now
o
ccupies."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Caldwell, Federal Reserve Agent of the Federal
Rese—
've Bank of Kansas City, reading as follows:




6/221)
1

-3-

.
"In accordance with the request contained in
Mr. Koppang's letter of June 19, 19)1, the Board of
Governors approves, effective July 1, 1971, the paymeat of salaries to the following named members of
the Federal Reserve Agent's staff at the rates indicated:
Name
Title
Federal Reserve Agent's
William R. Young
Representative,
Denver Branch
David E. Chase
Federal Reserve Agent's
Representative
Oklahoma City Branch
William F. Fairley
Federal Reserve Agent's
Representative
Omaha Branch
Earl O. Streeter
Federal Reserve Agent's
Representative
Omaha Branch

Annual Salary
$),326

Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Lunding, Federal Reserve Agent of the Federal
Reserve Bunk of Chicago, reading as follows:
"In accordance with the request contained in Mr.
Meyer's letter of June 19, 1921, the Board of Governors
approves, effective 'Tune 18, 191, the payment of salaries
to the following named members of the Federal Reserve Agent's
staff at the rates indicated:
Annual Salary
Title
Name
Carl Schelling
Assistant Federal Reserve
$61)40
Agent
George H. Schussler
Acting Assistant Federal
4,360
Reserve Agent
Federal
Clarence W. Kolz
Assistant
Alternate
Reserve Agent
Charles J. Scanlon
Alternate Assistant Federal
7,740
Reserve Agent
"In the absence of supporting information, these
salaries are approved on the assumption that they are
'within the salary ranges established for the grades in
14lich the respective positions are classified.




6/22/)1

_1_

"With respect to the increase in salary proposed
for Mildred Smith, our records indicate that she is a
stenographer in the Federal Reserve Note Issue Department and, inasmuch as her appointment did not require
the Board's approval, her rate of salary is not subject to the Board's specific approval."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Neely, Federal Reserve Agent of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Atlanta, reading as follows:
"In accordance with the request contained in
Your letter of June 13, 1951, the Board of Governors
approves, effective July 1, 1951, the payment of
salaries to the following named members of the Federal
Reserve Agent's staff at the rates indicated:
Annual Salary
Name
Title
Genevieve M. Barnett
Alternate Assistant
Federal Reserve
$4,524
Agent, Head Office
Federal Reserve
Stuart H. Magee
Agent's Representative,
4,564"
Nashville Branch
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Leach, President of the Federal Reserve Bank
cjf Richmond, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of June 15, 1951,
enclosing the original and two copies of an undated
letter received by your Bank from the International
ilAnk for Reconstruction and Development, setting
forth a proposed a3l'eement between that institution
all
'
( your Bank regarding the storage of microfilm
..,,
14ecord8 of the International Bank at the Federal
"serve Bank of Richmond. The International Bank
has advised us that its letter to your Bank should
have been dated June 12, 1951, and has authorized
tle in writing so to date the original and copies
Of its
letter.




-5-

6/22/51

"You state that it is satisfactory with your Bank
to accept the proposal made by the International Bank
if it meets with the approval of the Board of Governors.
"The Board approver ftcceptance by your Bank of the
proposal made by the International Bank in its letter of
June 12, 1951, under which your Bank will act as agent of
the International Bank, for the purposes stated, pursuant
to section 6 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act of July 31,
1945. The original and one carbon copy of the International
Bank's letter are returned to you herewith. We shall appreciate it if you will advise us of your Bank's acceptance
of the International Bank's proposal."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Glen McDaniel, President, Radio-Television Manufacturers Association, 1317 F Street, N. W., Washington, D. C., reading
as follows:
"Chairman Martin has asked me to acknowledge your
telegram of June 13 on behalf of the Radio-Television
Manufacturers Association and to advise you that the Board
is fully aware of and sympathetic with the situation as
You have outlined it.
"At this time the Board does not feel that the situation, considered in the light of the most reasonable assumptions with respect to overall developments during the coming
months, justifies relaxation of the consumer credit regulation (Regulation W)."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Honorable Eugene D. Millikin, United States Senate,
We,
ington, D. C., reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of May 29, 1951, which
contained an excerpt from a letter from one of your constituents.
The excerpt relates to Regulation W, which
l'egulates the terms of consumer instalment credit.
.L
"Your constituent expresses the view widely discributed by The Philip Lesly Company for the American




6/22/51

-6-

"Finance Conference, that control of consumer credit does
not curb inflation and calls attention to the low ratio
of consumer instalment credit to total disposable income.
The inflationary effect of consumer credit is not determined by its ratio to total disposable income, but by
its rate of expansion, that is, the rate at which new
credit' dollars become locked into the economy. While
consumer disposable income expanded $1.4 billion from
the second quarter to the third quarter of 1950, consumer instalment credit outstanding expanded $1.2 billion.
Thus the expansion of consumer instalment credit added
to the buying power of consumers an amount almost as
great as the total increase in disposable income. Regulation W was adopted to curb this substantial addition to
inflationary pressures by limiting the expansion of consumer purchasing power in the form of credit dollars.
"The statement that Regulation W is discriminatory,
and prevents the wage earners and people of limited income
from obtaining adequate transportation, is open to serious
question. There are millions of good serviceable used
cars now providing adequate transportation which at present prices are within the means of almost everyone. The
regulation has helped rather than penalized the consumer
Of moderate income by bringing demand down to a more sustainable level and by helping to prevent further inflation
in the economy as a whole.
"Consideration has been given on various occasions to
the inclusion of other articles under the regulation. However, items not now listed, such as jewelry, are generally
sold on terms well within the present provisions of the
regulation. To add them at this time would, in the Board's
°Pinion, place an unnecessarily heavy administrative burden
on both the trades involved and on the various Federal Reserve Banks. This question is receiving continuing study,
however, and the Board is prepared to place additional
nticles on the regulated list when such action is in the
erests of the defense program.
"The enclosed memorandum was prepared by the Board's
!
taff for the information of the Chairman and members of
2
1 49 Senate Banking and Currency Committee. You may find
"useful in answering any further questions you may have.
We are appreciative of this opportunity to comment
r Your constituent's letter, and you may be certain that
Points raised by your constituent will be carefully
'
0 sidered in the Board's continuing study of the regulation.0

r

1




6/22/51

-7Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Honorable Edward J. Thye, United States Senate,

Washington, D. C., reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of June 6, 1951, with
which you enclosed a letter from Mr. Paul E. Trueman, of
Quinn Brothers, Willmar, Minnesota, relative to Regulation
W concerning consumer credit.
"One of the major problems involved in administering
a regulation such as this is to make it restrictive enough
so that it will be effective in accomplishing its purpose,
and at the same time keep it from being an excessive burden
on the people who are subject to it. The provisions of the
regulation are constantly under study by the Board with a
view toward keeping them adapted to current economic and
credit conditions.
'While it is frequently stated that the present fifteen
month maximum maturity provision of the regulation makes it
impossible for the man of moderate income to purchase an
automobile, an analysis of the facts does not support such
a contention. Cars, new or used, are available at various
Prices to meet the budgets of practically all workers who
vant or need cars, and these cars cost less than they would
have in the absence of Regulation W. The regulation has
helped rather than penalized the person of moderate or
low income. It helps him where he is most in need of help -in his pocketbook.
"The Board is acutely conscious that current activity
in the automobile markets is substantially below the abnormal peak of last summer which was duplicated to a considerable degree in a second buying wave which hit consumer
markets in mid-winter. The large volume of sales last December
and January occurred despite the fact that the present terms
Of Regulation W were in effect at that time.
"The Board is also aware that inventories of both new
and used cars are above average levels prevailing during
the Postwar period. The long waiting period imposed on
new car purchasers in recent years indicate that inventories
were substantially below the normal prewar levels. Current
..-Ilventories do not appear to be excessive by comparison with
those prewar levels, particularly after taking into account
he high level of sales during the postwar period.




6/22/51

-8-

"The Board is continually studying the effect of
Regulation W in markets for particular regulated articles,
and we appreciate the opportunity of commenting on Mr.
Trueman's letter, which is returned as requested."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Olson, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of June 8, 1951, concerning
the status under Regulation W of instalment sale contracts
written on a 12-month basis to comply with State law, but
involving a balloon payment in the 12th month to be refinanced
for an additional period of three months.
"The principles stated in 321 Regulation W Service
W-97 (19) - are not limited to unclassified instalment
loans, but are applicable to other regulated instalment
Obligations as well. They would apply to an instalment
obligation for the purchase of an automobile or other
listed article.
"while it would be preferable for the 'express agreement' referred to in W-97 (1)) to be in writing, a bona
fide oral agreement would not cause the transaction to be
in violation of the regulation. In any event, however,
a Registrant holding such instalment paper should have in
his records information indicating in good faith that the
transaction in fact complied with the regulation and W-97
(19). As indicated at 806 Regulation W Service - W-70 the Board does not feel that it is practicable to lay
devn specific rules as to evidence in cases such as this.
The responsibility is that of the Registrant to have in
his files evidence to show that the paper he holds subject to Regulation W is in conformity with the regulation."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Honorable John J. Riley, House of Representatives,
liashin€
ton, D. C., reading as follows:




6/221
)
1

-9-

"This refers to your letter of June 6, 19;)1, with
which you enclosed a telegram from Lester W. Allen, Manager,
Boyle Motor Company, of Sumter, South Carolina, relative
to Regulation W concerning consumer credit.
"We feel certain you will agree that it is difficult
to consider Regulation W and its intended purposes apart
from the other monetary and fiscal measures which are
directed at reducing serious inflationary pressures.
The regulation, of course, is designed specifically
to curtail the flow of credit dollars into the spending
stream during the present emergency period when the
production of consumer goods is gradually being restricted.
"While the Board does not wish to be excessively
restrictive in the case of individual articles or industries, In carrying out its responsibilities under the
Defense Production Act it must at the same time consider
the necessity of curbing the inflationary effect of
instalment credit in the interests of the economy as
a whole during this period of national emergency.
"As you know, the Board's primary responsibility
is concerned with preserving the integrity and soundness
of the dollar. Every action it takes must be measured
against the broad background of developments in the
field of money and credit and meet a test indicating
Whether such action would add to the inflationary
Pressures already existent in the economy.
"Today the national income is at an all-time
record level. Unemployment is at its lowest point in
our peacetime history. Defense expenditures, which now
account for less than 10 per cent of total output, are
scheduled to rise sharply and may well account for as
much as twice that percentage within the next twelve
months. Considerable progress has been made in the past
few months in stemming the tide of inflation. However,
the substantial pressures on our economy resulting from
the expanding defense program are still present. At
the Present time the Board feels that in the light of
Potential developments during the coming months, the
situation does not justify relaxation of the regulation.
"We appreciate this opportunity of commenting on
Mr. Allen's telegram."




Approved unanimously.

6/22/21

-10Letter to Mr. E. G. Berry, Financial Secretary, Carpenters

Local Union 1971, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of
America, Temple, Texas, reading as follows:
"Thank you for your letter of June 8, 1951, regarding
the employment situation in the building trades in Temple,
Texas. we appreciate learning of such local conditions
since one of the primary concerns of the Federal Reserve
System is the maintenance of economic stability at a high
level of employment.
"In order to understand the present situation, we
think you should know that real estate credit restrictions,
which were authorized by Congress in the Defense Production
Act of 19)0, are designed to conserve labor and materials
for the national defense program and to aid in combating
inflation by restraining the expansion of real estate credit.
The requirements of the defense effort must be met by a
Partial diversion of manpower and resources from normal
Productive activity. We believe that the volume of defense
work will continue to increase and a much stronger effect
on employment will be felt later this year.
"Last October when this Board's Regulation X, Real Estate
Credit, and similar restrictions of the Federal Housing Administration and Veterans Administration were issued, a volume of
about 8)0,000 housing starts for 1921 was believed to be
aPpropriete. While this would mean a decline of around 4o
Per cent from 1950's record peak of housing construction,
it compares favorably with the other years since the war.
As of the end of May about 4)0,000 dwelling units had been
started in the United States thus far in 1951, which except
for last year, is at a rate in excess of any recent year.
"In addition to the restrictive effect of Regulation X
and its companion FHA and VA restrictions, a factor affecting
tne current situation is that many financing institutions
are fully loaned-up at present. This situation should imProve as lenders work off their backlog of commitments and
receive new savings and funds from pay-offs.
"We hope this answers the questions you raised in your
letter. If we can be of further assistance, please do not
hesitate to call upon us."




Approved unanimously.

6/22b1

-11Letter to Mr. Olson, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank

Of Chicago, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of June 8, 1951 to the
Board concerning the application of section 6(f) of Regulation X to the Wisconsin State veterans program. We agree
that in actual practice the full $3500 second mortgage
probably will be made in most cases. We have no objection,
however, to conventional lenders making loans up to the
maximum permitted by Regulation X and the State making
second mortgages in an amount which brings the total
credit to a level no greater than that allowed under
the F)deral VA program."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Schlaikjer, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank
O:

Boston, reading as follows:
"We acknowledge receipt of your letter of June 13,
1951, regarding the application of the Sutton Realty
Company of Providence, Rhode Island, for exemption
uader section 5(g) of Regulation X. This company did
not submit its request for exemption until May 18, 1951,
long after the expiration date of April 15, 1951.
"We have reviewed the correspondence with the Sutton
Realty Company which you enclosed and concur in your conclusions that no basis for exemption exists in this
Particular case."




Approved unanimously.