View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on Tuesday, June 212 1955. The Board met in the
Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Vardaman
Mills
Shepardson
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Board
Thurston, Assistant to the
of
ion
Divis
tor,
Leonard, Direc
Bank Operations
Vest, General Counsel
Sloan, Director, Division of
Examinations
tor,
Johnson, Controller, and Direc
tion
istra
Admin
nnel
Perso
Division of
el
Couns
e
lativ
Cherry, Legis

consideration was
At the meeting of the Board on June 16, 19550
of the Federal Regl:ven to drafts of letters to Mr. Alexander, Chairman
of the Conference of
serve Bank of St. Louis, and to Mr. Young, Chairman
related to
Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks, the first of which
which expressed the
certain entertainment expenses and the second of
with the Presidents at
41rdt3 desire to discuss this general subject
Presidents f Conference. Revised
the time of the current meeting of the
at the June 16
drafts had been prepared in the light of comments made
the members of the Board along
Meeting and copies thereof had been sent to
with a draft of letter to the Chairmen of all Federal Reserve Banks




6/21/55

-2-

which would transmit a copy of the letter to President Young and state
that the Board expected to review with the Presidents the matters referred to therein.
At the conclusion of a discussion,
unanimous approval was given to letters
as follows, each for the signature of
Chairman Martin:
Louis
Mr. Alexander
)Chairman, Federal Reserve Bank of St.
to expendiThe Board's examiners have called attention
baseball tickets
tures incurred by your Bank for theatre and
of
in connection with the joint meetings in 1953 and 1954
the directors of youriUnk and its branches.
which the Board
This has raised again the problem with
6). "While
dealt in its letter of January 161 19)45 (S-82
strongly
the amount involved was not large, the Board feels
should be
that it falls into a class of expenditure that
avoided in the future.
uar.
To ,
Young, Chairman
Banks

Federal Reserve
Conference of Presidents of the

to lay down
The Board recognizes that it is difficult
appropriate and
hard and fast rules to distinguish between
continues to feel
Inappropriate expenditures. The Board
expenditures
that decisions on certain Federal Reserve Bank
forth in its
Should be guided by the general principles set
principles recogletter of January 16, 1945 (S-826). These
relationship
nize that Federal Reserve Banks have a special rations,
corpo
d
to the Government. Unlike privately-owne
the Congress to
Federal"Reserve Banks were established by
Bank expendive
Reser
Perform essential public functions.
viewed in the same
tures, as of course you know, cannot be
prises.
light as those undertaken by private enter
as stated at
oint,
viewp
The Board is strongly of the
' Conference, that
meetings of the Chairmen's and Presidents
ry responsithe Federal Reserve Banks themselves have prima
eness of expenditures
bility for determining the appropriat
expenditures.
and that they should be prepared to justify
ess
As the Board stated in the 1945 letter, however, Congr
for
lity
nsibi
respo
of
has placed upon the Board a measure




ror-‘47

JLAJOIL)

6/21/55

—

reviewing expenditures of the Federal Reserve Banks.
Attached to the 1.945 letter was a memorandum specifi—
cally referring to certain types of expenditures which could
be incurred without the approval of the Board. The letter
confident
concluded with the statement that the Board was
full recog—
in
tion
discre
that the Banks would exercise their
funds
public
of
ds
stewar
nition of their responsibility as
t
commen
to
ers
examin
and that the Board would rely on its
they
which
itures
in reports of examination on any expend
such
felt should be questioned. The memorandum mentioned
itures
expend
matters as mementos for retiring directors,
for
for welfare and educational work, minor expenditures
retir—
to
gifts
testimonials, recognition of long service,
directly
ing employees, and expenditures for purposes not
related to the conduct of the Banks' affairs.
satisfactorily
The procedures outlined above have worked
has thought
Board
and there have been few occasions when the
the
While
.
itures
expend
it necessary to question specific
lunch—
of
costs
able
Board sees no objection to paying reason
gs of direc—
eons and dinners given in connection with meetin
Federal
the
by
ed
arrang
tors and other appropriate meetings
i—
expend
of
ess
riaten
approp
Reserve Banks, it questions the
the
for
s
ticket
tures for professional entertainment,
theatre and similar outlays.
ents the
At the forthcoming meeting with the Presid
a view
With
again
Board would like to review this subject
t to
respec
with
to reaching a more definite understanding
expenditures of this type.
Chairmen of
A copy of this letter is being sent to the
the respective Federal Reserve Banks.
To the Chairmen of all Federal Reserve Banks
the Presidents
The Board expects to review again with
of the
itures
expend
While they are in Washington certain
letter
tory
xplana
self—e
Federal Reserve Banks. A copy of a
in
ence
Confer
ents
being sent to the Chairman of the Presid
this connection is attached.
consideration was given to three
At the meeting on June l51 1_955,
alternative drafts of a letter to the Comptroller General of the United
Reserve System which the
States relating to the audit of the Federal




6/21/55

-4-

General Accounting Office had been requested to make by the Chairman of
the House Committee on Government Operations. The first two drafts had
been amended on the basis of discussion at that meeting and copies of all
three drafts had been sent to the members of the Board. The first two
drafts, marked A and B, respectively, took the same general position, i.e.,
that the Board could not lawfully acquiesce in such an audit in the ab—
draft A the rea—
senoe of an express directive from the Congress, but in
sons for that conclusion were spelled out in more detail. The third draft,
which was marked draft

Cp

Szymczak, ex—
and stated the views of Governor

the absence of
Pressed doubt whether the proposed audit should be made in
an express directive from the Congress but stated that, notwithstanding
fullest extent possible
those doubts, the Board wished to cooperate to the
and would make available to the General Accounting Office the reports of
and 1954 and
examination of the Federal Reserve Banks for the years 1953
same years in the
the reports of audit of the Board's accounts for the
ler General
hoPe that a review of those reports would enable the Comptrol
to comply satisfactorily with the request which had been made of him.
Ir. Vest, who was
In response to a question by Chairman Martin,
the fact that
iholined to favor draft C, stated that he was influenced by
the other two drafts put the arguments almost exclusively on the basis of
that even in the
legal considerations, whereas it was his understanding
that there were fundamental
absence of such considerations, the Board felt
l'easons why such an audit should not be made. He pointed out that if a




1065
6/21/55

-5-

Position were taken along the lines stated in drafts A and B, the Committee on Government Operations might subpoena the Board and the Federal
Reserve Banks. In the circumstances, he felt there was something to be
said for a more conciliatory approach.
Chairman Martin, who favored a position such as that taken in draft
A) stated that he did so because he felt that the point had been reached
Where it was not possible to temporize any further with principle.

He re-

ferred to the cooperation extended by the Board last year in making reports
cf examination and audit of the System available to the House Banking and
Currency Committee and indicated that in his opinion it would now be to
the Boardts advantage to seek a hearing before the Committee on Government
°Aerations in order to present the reasons why it was felt that an audit
Of the System such as proposed should not be conducted. To bring the matter
to the stage of a hearing, he pointed out, it was necessary to cite the
legal arguments as to why the conclusion had been reached that the Board
could not lawfully acquiesce in the proposed audit.

He felt, however, that

the Points made by Mr. Vest deserved consideration and that they might be
Inet by some expansion of draft A.
During further discussion which ensued, it developed that all of
the members of the Board who were present favored the position taken in
dr'afts A and B and that all except Governor Balderston preferred the
1°nger exposition contained in draft A. A number of changes were then suggested which would modify draft A in various respects, including changes




1766
6/21/55

-6-

designed to take into account the views expressed by Governor Balderston
and Mr. Vest. There was agreement that the letter should indicate specif—
ically that the Board would welcome an opportunity for a hearing.
Chairman Martin then stated that a letter should be sent to the
Comptroller General tomorrow, but that before the letter was transmitted
it would be necessary to clear it with the Federal Open Market Committee
at the Committee's meeting tomorrow morning. He suggested, therefore,
that Mr. Thurston and Mr. Vest be requested to revise draft A in the light
of the various comments made at this meeting and that copies of the revised
draft be sent to each member of the Board so that there would be an oppor—
tunity for any further suggestions before the meeting of the Federal Open
Market Committee.
There was unanimous agreement
with the procedure suggested by
Chairman Martin.
group with which
Chairman Martin stated that the investment banker
the Treasury meets on Government financing had requested another meeting
with the Board, the suggestion having been made that the visit be at ll:45
a'In. on June 28, 3_9551 following a meeting of the group with representatives
Of the Treasury.




There was some discussion of the
g
advantages and disadvantages in accedin
con—
the
to requests of this kind, at
clusion of which it was agreed unani—
the
mously to extend an invitation to
the
at
group to meet with the Board
time suggested.

106
6/21/55

-7Governor Mills referred to the agreement at the meeting of the

Board on May 18, 1955, to have a meeting late this month with the chair—
men of the respective consultant groups engaged in the studies being made
for the Congressional Subcommittee on Economic Statistics (WIT headed by
Representative Bolling) and stated that such a meeting had been arranged
te ntatively for 10:00 a.m. on June 27, 1955.
There was unanimous agreement that
the meeting should be held at the time
suggested.
Governor Balderston stated that he had extended an invitation to
Exter, Vice President of the New York Reserve Bank, to meet with the
Board on the morning of Thursday, June 30, 1955, to comment on his recent
tll-P to Europe.
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System on June 20, 19552 were approved unanimously.
The meeting then adjourned.