View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for

To:

Members of the Board

From:

Office of the Secretary

June

2, 1960

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System on the above date.
It is proposed to place in the record of policy actions
required to be kept under the provisions of Section 10 of the
Federal Reserve Act an entry covering the item in this set of
minutes commencing on the page and dealing with the subject
referred to below:
Page

7

Approval of a discount rate of 3-1/2
per cent for the Federal Reserve Banks
of Philadelphia and San Francisco; and
agreement to approve the same rate for
any other Federal Reserve Bank advising
of the establishment of such rate.

Should you have any question with regard to the minutes,
it will be appreciated if you will advise the Secretary's Office.
Otherwise, please initial below. If you were present at the
meeting, your initials will indicate approval of the minutes. If
you were not present, your initials will indicate only that you
have seen the minutes.




Chin. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. King

Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Sysrem
on Thursday, June 2, 1960.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

The Board met in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.

Martin, Chairman
Szymczak
Mills
Robertson
King
Sherman, Secretary
Thomas, Adviser to the Board
Young, Adviser to the Board
Shay, Legislative Counsel
Hackley, General Counsel
Noyes, Director, Division of
Research and Statistics
Mr. Farrell, Director, Division of
Bank Operations
Mr. Solomon, Director, Division of Examinations
Mr. Conkling, Assistant Director, Division of
Bank Operations
Mrs. Semis, Technical Assistant, Office of
the Secretary
Mr. Young, Assistant Counsel
Mr. Veenstra, Technical Assistant, Division
of Bank Operations

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Call report forms for use by State member banks

(Item No. 1).

There had been distributed copies of a letter to the Presidents of all
Federal Reserve Banks transmitting forms for the use of State member
call
banks and their affiliates in submitting reports as of the next
date.

In addition to the information requested on recent calls,

wn
these forms included a supplementary schedule requesting a breakdo
Of time deposits of individuals, partnerships, and corporations, and
and other
information concerning the maximum rates paid on savings
time deposits.

The letter also called for reports of deposits by

branches.
counties from those State member banks that have out-of-county




-2-

6/2/6o

Because of the need for these latter data in connection with applications for mergers or branches or under the Bank Holding Company Act,
reporting banks were to be informed that the information vas being
collected with the understanding that it would be considered public
information for such purposes.

It was pointed out that the Office of

the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation were also requesting the county deposit figures, the rates
of interest paid on time and savings deposits, and the breakdown of
time deposits.
After discussion, the letter was approved unanimously in the
form attached hereto as Item No. 1, with the understanding that it would
be sent when the forms were printed.
Request for report on H. R. 9914 (Item No. 2).

In a letter

dated February 2, 1960, Representative Spence, Chairman of the House
Banking and Currency Committee, had requested a report from the Board
On H. R. 9914, a bill "To provide that no member of the Board of
Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall be the
Comptroller of the Currency or a member of the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System or members of their staff."
A memorandum from the Legal Division dated May 31, 1960, had
been distributed in which it was noted that the Comptroller of the
Currency had been an ex-officio member of the Board of Directors of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation since its organization, that
no specific provision of law authorizes any member of the Board of
the
Governors or its staff to serve on the Corporation's Board, and that




6/2/6o

-3-

present law provides that no member of the Board of the Corporation
shall be an officer or director of any Federal Reserve Bank.

The

memorandum also indicated that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation had submitted to the Budget Bureau a proposed report on the bill
strongly opposing the removal of the Comptroller of the Currency from
the Corporations Board but making no mention of the provision of
the bill concerning the Board of Governors or its staff.

A copy of

the proposed letter from Mr. Wolcott, Chairman of the Corporation,
reporting on the bill was attached to the memorandum.

The General

Counsel's office of the Comptroller of the Currency had informed the
Legal Division that it intended to oppose the bill strongly.
A draft of report to Chairman Spence had been distributed
which would state that, while the Board had no objection to the provision of the bill forbidding members of the Board of Governors and its
staff to serve on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Board,
the provision seemed unnecessary because none of these persons now
serve and it is not contemplated that they will do so.

The draft letter

would also state that the Board questioned the desirability of removing
the Comptroller of the Currency from the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Board because that Board as presently constituted promotes
full coordination and cooperation on matters within the purview of the
Corporation that affect both State chartered banks and national banks.

An alternative draft of letter was also distributed which did not
Include any comment on the provision of the bill concerning the Comptroller of the Currency.




20!)
-4-

6/2/60

Governor Robertson said that he did not think the Comptroller
of the Currency should serve on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Board for the reason that time did not permit the adequate discharge
of the duties of both positions.

So far as the present report was

concerned, he believed that the Board should make no comment with respect
to this provision of the bill.
In response to an inquiry by Chairman Martin, Mr. Shay stated
that the bill was sponsored by the National Association of Supervisors
of State Banks.
Governor Szymczak expressed the view that it was not necessary
to prohibit members of the Board of Governors and its staff from serving
on the Corporation's Board.

It was pointed out that none of them has

ever served on that Board, and the Federal Reserve Act requires members
Of the Board of Governors to devote their full time to their service as such.

Governor Mills stated that the Board was not being asked to
express a philosophy as to whether the Comptroller of the Currency could
afford the time to serve on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Board.

Since the bill was the proposal of the State bank supervisors,

whose reasoning was that the Comptroller's interest and influence on
the Corporation's Board was prejudicial to the dual banking system, he
thought that failure to comment on the provision of the bill regarding
the Comptroller would be tantamount to an indication that the Board of
Governors was in accord with the position of the State bank supervisors.




6/2/60

-5-

It seemed to Governor Mills that as a Federal regulatory agency the
Board of Governors should align itself with the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation and with the position the Comptroller himself
presumably would take.
Mr. Hackley noted that the Board had recommended in 1935
that the Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of the Treasury
no longer serve as ex-officio members of the Federal Reserve Board.
The proposal in this bill would be of a somewhat similar nature.

How-

ever, there might be good reason for retaining the Comptroller on the
Federal Deposit Insurance Board, and if the Board of Governors thought
that to be the case, it might wish to say so in the report.
Messrs. Molony and Fauver, Assistants to the Board, entered the
room during the foregoing discussion.
Governor Robertson said that the same question had come up
early in 1957 at hearings on a tentative draft of the Financial Institutions Act.

One of the proposals under consideration was that the

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation be headed by a single administrator,
"ho would have the assistance of an advisory board that would include
the Chairman of the Board of Governors or his designee.

Governor Robertson

had testified that the Board of Governors questioned the desirability of
such Federal Reserve representation on the proposed advisory board.

He

had declined to speak for the Board on the desirability of making the
Federal Deposit Insurance Board a one-man operation, because the Board
Of Governors had not considered that question, but had expressed his




6/2/6o

-6-

personal view that he did not think that the Comptroller of the
Currency ought to be a member of the Corporation *s Board.

He also

had stated that, in his opinion, in the bank supervisory field the
Ideal arrangement would be to have a board make the rules and
regulations so that these would reflect a variety of points of view.
That board, however, should have nothing to do with carrying out
the laws so far as bank supervision was concerned, and the insurance
and supervisory functions would be handled by agencies headed by
single administrators.
position

Governor Robertson said that his present

in considering the current proposal to remove the Comptroller

Of the Currency from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Board,
was that he would like to see all participation by other supervisory
agencies removed from the Corporations Board.

However, it seemed to

him that the Board of Governors should not express an opinion because
it was not in a position to know the inner workings or problems of
the deposit insurance function.
Governor mills expressed a preference for staying close to the
proposed letter.

He liked Chairman Wolcott's reasoning as expressed

in the proposed report on the bill by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation.

The service of the Comptroller provides a connecting

link between the national and State banking systems that helps to maintain harmony and mutual understanding.

It must be remembered, he said,

that the State bank supervisors had proposed one or two other measures.




2053
6/2/6o

-7-

One, as he recalled, would eliminate the requirement that a State
member bank ask Federal Reserve approval in establishing a branch,
leaving that decision solely with the State supervisory authorities
and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Governors Szymczak and King suggested certain changes in the
wording of the letter to Chairman Spence, and Chairman Martin asked
Mr. Shay what likelihood there was that the bill would be considered
at this session of the Congress.

Mr. Shay replied that although some

pressure was reportedly being exerted, there seemed little likelihood
On the other hand, the House Banking and

Of active consideration.

Currency Committee usually asks for reports on bills only when they
are specifically desired.
After further discussion, the letter to Representative Spence
was approved in the form attached as Item No. 2, Governor Robertson
dissenting for the reasons he had stated.
Money supply.

Mr. Noyes reported that preliminary estimates

Indicated that the money supply had declined in May, possibly by as
much as a billion dollars, and this report was followed by a brief
discussion of the matter.
The meeting then recessed and reconvened in the Board Room at
12:08 p.m. with the same members of the Board and Messrs. Sherman
and Molony in attendance.
Discount rates.

Chairman Martin stated that a telegram had

been received from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia advising




2,0!)
-8-

6/2/6o

g had
that the directors of that Bank at their meeting this mornin
established a discount rate of 3-1/2 per cent (rather than

4 per cent)

l
on discounts and advances under sections 13 and 13a of the Federa
Board of
Reserve Act, subject to review and determination by the
Governors.

The directors had also established a rate of

4 per cent

ng
on advances under section 10(b), and other rates in the Bank's existi
schedule without change.

After discussion it was agreed unanimously

Reserve
to approve the rates fixed by the directors of the Federal
Bank of Philadelphia, effective June

3, 1960, with the understanding

this afternoon
that a press release in the usual form would be issued
at 4:00 p.m., E.D.T., that all Federal Reserve Banks and branches
and that a notice
would be advised of the Board's action by telegram,
would be published in the Federal Register.
be received
It was also agreed unanimously that if advice should
e Bank had acted
later that the directors of any other Federal Reserv
rates consistent
to establish a discount rate of 3-1/2 per cent and other
enter approval of
with this pattern, the Secretary was authorized to
be followed similar
those actions in the minutes and procedures would
to those authorized in the case of the Philadelphia Bank.




Secretary's Note: Subsequent to the meeting,
a telegram was received advising that the
directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco had established a rate of 3-1/2
per cent on discounts and advances under
sections 13 and 13a, a rate of 4 per cent
on advances under section 10(b), and a rate

205‘
-9-

6/2/60

of 4-1/2 per cent on advances to individuals,
partnerships, or corporations other than
member banks under the last paragraph of
section 13. Accordingly, the San Francisco
Bank was advised of Board approval of these
rates, effective June 3, 1960. Notice of
this action was included in the press release
issued at 4:oo p.m. and in the telegram sent
to all Federal Reserve Banks and branches,
and arrangements were made for publication
of a notice in the Federal Register.

The meeting then adjourned.




Secreary

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 1
6/2/60

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

June

3, 1960.

Dear Sir:
The indicated number of copies of the following forms are being
forwarded to your Bank under separate cover for use of State member banks
and their affiliates in submitting reports as of the next call date. A
co-- of each form is attached.
Number of
Conies
Form F.R. 105 (Call No. 156), Report of conditions of
State member banks.
Form F.R. 105e (Revised November 1955), Publisher's
copy of report of condition of State member banks.
Form F.R. 105e-1 (Revised November 1955), Publisher's
copy of report of condition of State member banks.
Form F.R. 105e-2 (Revised November 1955), Publisher's
copy supplement.
Form F.R. 105fa (Revised May 1960), Schedule FA - Supplementary data on time deposits of individuals,
partnerships, and corporations and maximum interest
rates paid on savings and other time deposits.
Form F.R. 220 (Revised March 1952), Report of affiliate
or holding company affiliate.
Form F.R. 220a (Revised March 1952), Publisher's copy
of report of affiliate or holding company affiliate.
With the exception of form F.R. 105fa, all of the forms are the
same as those used on March 15, 1960.




205r;'
-2--

Supplementary Schedule FA. This schedule has been added in
order to obtain from all insured commercial banks, a breakdown of time
deposits of individuals, partnerships, and corporations, item 14 on the
report of condition. The present Schedule FA is similar to that collected with the June 23, 1958 and June 6, 1957 calls except for the
additional request for maximum rates paid on savings and other time
deposits. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation are requesting similar information from
national and insured nonmember commercial banks, respectively. This
interest rate information has not been collected previously at a single
date from all insured commercial banks.
The purpose of the proposed supplementary schedule is to
Obtain current information on the maximum rates paid by banks on savings
and time deposits for use in considering the need for changes in the
regulations governing maximum rates that may be paid on these deposits
and on the types of deposits included in the regularly reported item and
holders of these deposits.
Deposits by Counties. Continuing the program for collecting
branch statistics biennially, it is requested that reports of deposits
by counties be obtained from those State member banks that have out-ofcounty branches. As in the past, this information will be used to tabulate data to be published in the pamphlet, "Distribution of Bank Deposits
by Counties and Standard Metropolitan Areas", which was last collected
and published as of June 23, 1958.
Deposits by counties of individual banks have not previously
been made public except as necessarily disclosed in giving aggregate
figures for each county. However, this year, in view of the need for
usable data regarding the distribution of deposits among different banks
within each county, with respect to applications for mergers or branches
or under the Bank Holding Company Act, reporting banks should be informed
that this information is being collected with the understanding that it
will be considered public information for such purposes.
These reports should be as of the same date as the call for
reports of condition and should include the following:
1.

Demand deposits of individuals, partnerships, and corporations. (Total should agree with item 13 of the report of
condition.)

2.

Time deposits of individuals, partnerships, and corporations. (Total should agree with item 14 of the report of
condition.)




205,
-33.

Other deposits. (Total should agree with items 15, 16, 17,
and 18 of the report of condition.)

The banks should estimate data for counties in which they have
branches that accept deposits but do not maintain separate records.
Figures for each branch may be furnished, arranged by counties, in lieu
of county totals but only county totals will be used in any necessary
Public disclosure.
The reports received from the respondent banks should be
checked for reasonableness and to assure that the totals by counties are
in agreement with the corresponding items on the reports of condition,
and should then be forwarded to the Board. Reasonable extensions of
time may be granted the member banks to prepare these reports.
Similar reports are being collected from national banks by the
Comptroller of the Currency and from nonmember banks by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation; these data will also be considered public
information for use with respect to applications for mergers or branches
Or under the Bank Holding Company Act. The Bureau of the Budget has
approved collection of these data under Budget Bureau No. 55-R182.4.
Very trul

Merritt She
Secretar
Enclosures

X THE PRESIDENTS OF ALL FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS




IC4

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF' THE

Item No. 2
6/2/60

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

June 2, 1960.

The Honorable Brent Spence,
Chairman,
Committee on Banking and Currency,
House of Representatives,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Mr. Chairman:
This is in response to your request of February 2,
report on the bill, H.R. 9914, "To provide that
a
1960, for
the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit
of
no member
tion shall be the Comptroller of the Currency
Corpora
Insurance
or a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System or members of their staff."
The Board has no objection to the provision forbidding members of the Board of Governors and its staff from
serving on the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. However, the Board questions the desirability of removing the Comptroller of the Currency from the
FDIC Board for the reason that the FDIC Board as constituted
under present law promotes coordination and cooperation on
matters within the purview of the FDIC which affect both State
chartered banks and national banks.




Sincerely yours,
•

61/ 11.)

oc:

Wm. McC. Martin, Jr.