View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

892

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Tuesday, June 1.51 1954.

The Board met in

the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Szymczak
Mills
Robertson
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Leonard, Director, Division of Bank
Operations
Young, Director, Division of Research
and Statistics
Solomon, Assistant General Counsel
Hostrup, Assistant Director, Division
of Examinations
Youngdahl, Assistant Director, Division
of Research and Statistics
Cherry, Legislative Counsel

Mr. Cherry stated that yesterday he delivered to the office
of the Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee reports
of examination of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks and audits of the
System Open Market Account for the five years ending 1_953, together
with the letter addressed to Chairman Wolcott which had been approved
by the Board at the meeting on June 11, 1954.

He reviewed discus—

sions which he had with Representatives Patman and Oakman and members
of the staff of the Committee when he delivered the reports in the
morning and also at a meeting in the afternoon which was arranged at
Mr. Patmanis suggestion.

Mr. Cherry commented particularly on

Representative Patmants request that the reports be delivered to the




OfZ

6/15/54

—2—

General Accounting Office where representatives of that office
could go over them for the purpose of indicating their views as
to the adequacy of the examinations and audits, stating that he
informed Representative Patman that he could not go beyond the
terms of the letter from Chairman Martin which stated that the
documents were being sent to the Banking and Currency Committee
with the understanding that they may be made available in confi—
dence only to members of Congress and the staff of that Committee.
Mr. Cherry also said that representatives of the General Account—
ing Office were present during the afternoon meeting, apparently
at Mr. Patmants request, and that they indicated a preference for
having a resolution by the House Banking and Currency Committee
requesting the General Accounting Office to review the examination
reports, if such reports were to be delivered to them for review.
There was a discussion of possible actions that might be
taken by the Board in the event such a resolution were adopted by
the House Banking and Currency Committee, and it was agreed that no
action by the Board was called for at this time.
Messrs. Cherry and Hostrup withdrew from the meeting at this
point.
Before this meeting there had been sent to the members of
the Board a memorandum from Mr. Young dated June 11, 1954, regarding
an inquiry he had received from Mr. Stuart A. Rice, Assistant




S94
6/15/54

-3-

Director for Statistical Standards, Office of Statistical Standards, Bureau of the Budget, inquiring as to deficiencies and gaps
in the Federal statistics program.

Mr. Young explained that Mr.

Rice's letter was prompted by a request which he had received from
Congressman Tall°, Chairman of the Statistics Subcommittee of the
Joint Committee on the Economic Report.

Mr. Young also referred to

a draft of reply to Mr. Rice which had been prepared for his signature reading as follows:
In reply to your letter of May l4„ 1954, we believe
that the most important requirement for increasing the
efficiency, reliability, and accuracy of existing statistical series is a firm program of periodic censuses.
The availability of benchmark statistics at relatively
frequent intervals is an indispensable prerequisite to
improved current series. Comprehensive censuses of
manufactures, minerals, business, agriculture, housing
and government should be taken with reasonable frequency
and should be supplemented by intercensal surveys based
on samples. The programs in this field recently recommended by the Intensive Review Committee appear to us to
be appropriate.
A second general requirement, in our view, is a
speed-up in processing of data, so that more timely
figures can be made available for use. Substantial progress has been made recently by some agencies with respect to current monthly statistics, and much more can
be done in this area. More importantly, release of
benchmark data needs to be speeded up. However, improvements in timeliness should not be carried to the point
where the quality of the data is seriously affected.
Some of the more important specific limitations in
existing series and programs--as we see them--are touched
on in the attachment. In a memorandum on the programs of
the Bureau of the Census to the Bureaufs Intensive Review
Committee, dated October 21, 1953, we discussed some of
the important specific limitations in existing series and
programs in greater detail. It is my understanding that
a copy of this memorandum has been made available to the




895
6/15/54

-4-

Office of Statistical Standards.
Because of limitations of time, the attached summary
of our views regarding statistical needs in specific areas
is confined to programs which have recently come under our
review. The remarks are also confined to major needs and
do not include miscellaneous gaps -which are currently re—
ceiving the attention of the compiling organizations, nor
a number of subjects now under review by committees organ—
ized by the Bureau of the Budget in their continuing pro—
gram for improving government statistics.
Mr. Young went on to say that Mr. Rice had indicated that his
reply to Mr. Tallels inquiry mould be in the form of a letter to which
would be appended copies of letters of comment he received from the
various Government departments and agencies to which he had addressed
letters inquiring as to deficiencies in the Federal statistics program.
During a discussion of the proposed reply, Governor Mills
Rice
stated that he felt it entirely appropriate to furnish Mr.
d by Mr.
with the comments suggested in the draft of letter presente
concurred
Young and all of the members of the Board who were present
in this view.
Thereupon, the proposed letter
to Mr. Rice was approved unanimously.
Mr. Sloan, Director, Division of Examinations, entered the
room at this point.
Before this meeting there had been sent to the members of
s of The Hartford—
the Board a draft of letter to the Board of Director
Connecticut Trust Company, Hartford, Connecticut, reading as follows:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Bostonl the Board of Governors of the




8°6
6/15/54

-5-

Federal Reserve System approves the establishment of
a branch at 803 Main Street, Hartford, Connecticut in
connection with a proposed merger of your institution
with Phoenix State Bank and Trust Company, Hartford,
Connecticut. It is understood that the title of the
merged institution will be The Connecticut Bank and
Trust Company. This approval is given provided (a)
the merger is effected as proposed, (b) the branch
is established within six months from the date of
this letter and (c) establishment of the branch is
formally approved by the appropriate State authorities.
Governor Robertson stated that he had not had an opportunity
to read the proposed letter to The Hartford-Connecticut Trust Company
or the memorandum from the Division of Examinations dated June

4,

1954, regarding the proposed merger and approval by the Board of the
establishment of a branch by the merged institution in the location
formerly occupied by the head office of Phoenix State Bank and Trust
Company. However, in view of a telephone call from President
Erickson of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston this morning stating
that the directors of the two banks concerned were meeting at eleven
o'clock this morning for the purpose of considering the terms of the
proposed merger, he would have no objection to discussing the matter
at this meeting.
Mr. Sloan then reviewed the terms of the proposed merger
along the lines of the memorandum from the Division of Examinations
dated June

4, 1954. He stated that the capital stock and surplus

of the merged institution would be at least equal to the aggregate
capital stock and the aggregate surplus of the two banks involved




897
-6-

6/15/54

in the merger, that the existing branches of the two merging banks
would continue as branches of the merged institution, and that the
question presented for Board approval was the establishment of a
branch in the quarters formerly occupied as a head office by Phoenix
State Bank and Trust Company.

Mr. Sloan also stated, in response

to an inquiry from Governor Robertson, that it did not appear that
the proposed merger would conflict with the anti-trust laws, and
that the Connecticut Banking Commission had informally approved the
proposed merger subject to completion of plans and agreements and
approval by shareholders of each bank.
At the conclusion of the discussion, unanimous approval was-given to
the letter set forth above addressed
to the Board of Directors, The HartfordConnecticut Trust Company, Hartford,
Connecticut, with the understanding
that it would be transmitted through
the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
Mr. Sloan withdrew from the meeting at this point.
Before this meeting there had been circulated among the members
of the Board a memorandum from Mr. Solomon dated June 9, 1954, transmitting a proposed set of answers to a questionnaire received from
the Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government (Hoover Commission) regarding the Boardts administrative procedures. During a discussion of the memorandum a minor change in
wording was suggested on page 41.




898
6/15/54

-7Following discussion, unanimous approval was given to the
transmission of the proposed answers to Mr. John B. Hollister,
Executive Director of the Commission.
There followed a general discussion of possible changes that

might be made in reserve requirements of member banks, at the conclusion of which it was understood that further consideration would
be given to the matter at an early meeting of the Board.
The meeting then adjourned.

During the day the following

additional actions were taken by the Board with all of the members
except Governors Evans and Vardaman present:
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on June 11, 1954, were approved unanimously.
Minutes of the action taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on June 14, 1954, were approved and the action
recorded therein was ratified unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. Wysor, Deputy Chairman, Federal Reserve Bank
of Richmond, reading as follows:
The Board of Governors approves the payment of salary
to Mr. James M. Slay as Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond for the period July 5, 1954, through
December 31, 1954, at the rate of $14,000 per annum, which
is the rate fixed by the Executive Committee with the concurrence of a majority of your Board of Directors as indicated in your letter of June 9, 1954.
The Board further approves the payment of salary to
K. Brantley Watson as Personnel Consultant at the rate of
$15,000 per annum for a period of five weeks following
entrance upon duty of Mr. Slay.




Approved unanimously.

899
-8-

6/15/54

Letter to Mr. Wiltse, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank
of New York, reading as follows:
This refers to your letter of May 282 1954 and the
enclosed copies of the letter from your bank to Mr. Donald M. Liddell, Jr., dated April 271 1954 and Mr. Liddell's
reply dated May 19, 1954 regarding the applicability of
section 32 to Mr. Liddell's services as director of The
National State Bank of Elizabeth and as director of
Templeton & Liddell Fund, Inc.
As was pointed out in the Board's letter of May 21,
1953, the question was then thought to be a close one.
When your letter of March 26, 1954 was received the matter was reviewed and very carefully considered by the
Board, and, for the reasons stated in its letter of April
19, 1954 and summarized in your bank's letter of April
272 1954 to Mr. Liddell, the Board concluded that the
statute was applicable.
The Board, as you know, is not given discretion by
the statute to issue permits in individual cases. The
statute applies to interlocking relationships with corporations "primarily engaged" in underwTiting„ selling
exand distributing securities, and the Board may make
the
of
review
Upon
ceptions by general regulations only.
192
May
of
letter
's
information contained in Mr. Liddell
19542 the Board does not believe that it should change
the view expressed in its letter of April 19, 1954.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to The Second National Bank of Cooperstown, Cooperstown,
New York, reading as follows:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has given consideration to your supplemental application for fiduciary powers, and, in addition to the
authority heretofore granted to act as trustee, executor,
administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of
estates, assignee, receiver, and committee of estates of
lunatics, grants you authority to act, when not in contravention of State or local law, in any other fiduciary
capacity in which State banks, trust companies, or other
corporations which come into competition with national




900
6/15/54
banks are permitted to act under the laws of the State
of New York. The exercise of all such powers shall
be subject to the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act
and the regulations of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
A formal certificate indicating the fiduciary
powers which The Second National Bank of Cooperstown
is now authorized to exercise will be forwarded to you
in due course.
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York.
Letter to the Board of Directors, Lincoln Rochester Trust
Company, Rochester, New York, reading as follows:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Board of Governors approves the establishment of a branch by
Lincoln Rochester Trust Company, Rochester, New York,
at 101 Eastway Plaza, 1950 Empire Boulevard, in an
unincorporated area of the Town of Penfield, Monroe
County, New York, provided the branch is established
within one year from the date of this letter.
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York.
Letter to the Board of Directors, Peoples Union Bank,
McKeesport, Pennsylvania, reading as follows:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approves the
establishment of a branch at 3515 Walnut Street,
McKeesport, Pennsylvania, by Peoples Union Bank,
McKeesport, Pennsylvania, provided formal approval is
obtained from the State authorities, and the branch
is established within one year of the date of this
letter.




Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

901
6/15/54

-10Letter to Kenosha National Bank, Kenosha, Wisconsin, read-

ing as follows:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System has given consideration to your application for
fiduciary powers and grants you authority to act,
when not in contravention of State or local law, as
trustee, executor, administrator, registrar of stocks
and bonds, guardian of estates, assignee, receiver,
committee of estates of lunatics, or in any other
fiduciary capacity in which State banks, trust companies or other corporations which come into competition with national banks are permitted to act under
the laws of the State of Wisconsin, the exercise of
all such rights to be subject to the provisions of
the Federal Reserve Act and the regulations of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
A formal certificate indicating the fiduciary
powers which the Kenosha National Bank is now
authorized to exercise will be forwarded to you in
due course.
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago.
Letter to Mr. Peterson, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank
of St. Louis, reading as follows:
This refers to your letter of May 28, 1954, by
which you transmitted the request of the Saitz City
Bank, Svitz City, Indiana, for permission under the
provisions of its condition of membership numbered 1
to act as registrar for the stock of the Switz City
Central School Building Corporation. It is noted that
it is not the desire of the member bank to exercise
general trust poNers and that the authority requested
is solely to permit the bank to continue administration
of this specific account.
Folloaing consideration of the information submitted and in view of your favorable recommendation,
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. System
grants the applicant permission, under the provisions




9C)2
-11of its condition of membership numbered 1, to act as
registrar in the specific instance above described
with the understanding that it will not acquire any
other fiduciary business without first obtaining permission of the Board. Please advise the member bank
accordingly.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to The First National Bank in Blytheville, Blytheville,
Arkansas, reading as follows:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System has given consideration to your supplemental
application for fiduciary powers and grants you
authority to act, when not in contravention of State
or local law, as trustee, executor, administrator,
s,
registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of estate
cs,
lunati
of
assignee, receiver, committee of estates
banks,
State
or in any other fiduciary capacity in which
into
trust companies or other corporations which come
act
to
ted
competition with national banks are permit
ic
specif
The
under the laws of the State of Arkansas.
e
truste
as
authorization granted on May 7, 1952, to act
and
bonds
in connection with Public Housing Authority
the
as registrar of such bonds is now contained in
exerThe
general fiduciary powers herein authorized.
provisions
cise of these powers shall be subject to the
of the
of the Federal Reserve Act and the regulations
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
ary
A formal certificate indicating the fiduci
is
ville
powers which The First National Bank in Blythe
you
to
now authorized to exercise will be forwarded
in due course.
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
e
l
Letter to Mr. Pondrom, Vice President, Federa Reserv Bank
of Dallas, reading as follows:
28, 1954,
Reference is made to your letter of May
McAllen,
Bank,
State
n
McAlle
of
submitting the application
.
powers
ary
fiduci
se
exerci
Texas, for permission to




9"1
-12-

6/15/54

Following consideration of the information submitted by you in this connection and in view of your
favorable recommendation, the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System grants the applicant permission, under the provisions of its condition of
membership numbered 1, to exercise the fiduciary
powers now or hereafter authorized under the terms
of its charter and the laxs of the State of Texas.
You are requested to advise the McAllen State
Bank, McAllen, Texas, of the Board's action.
Approved unanimously.
of
Letter to Mr. Harris, Chairman, Federal Reserve Bank
Atlanta, reading as follows:
al
At the completion of the examination of the Feder
Reserve Bank of Atlanta, made as of February 19, 19542
examby the Board's examiners, a copy of the report of
the
of
that
and
n
ination was left for your informatio
Bryan.
directors. A copy also was left for President
t has
repor
the
that
e
The Board will appreciate advic
tors.
of
Direc
been considered by the Board
nts
The Board would appreciate having your comme
ding
regar
taken
be
to
with respect to action taken or
recom
of
ct
subje
the several matters which were the
ws:
follo
as
ners,
exami
mendations or suggestions by the
of
Birmingham Branch. Correction of method
reporting deposits and required reserves by
member banks and exercise of greater care by
branch personnel in checking such reports
(page 95).
of
Jacksonville Branch. Closer supervision
loan
operations regarding Treasury tax and
records
accounts to prevent discrepancies in
ct
corre
pertaining to collateral, and to
ent
cilem
tardiness in the submission and recon
es
itari
of the monthly statements of depos
(page 139).
New Orleans Branch. Requirement, and recording,
of official approval of unusual reserve adjustter
ments (page 200); prompt posting of regis
r
for
membe
of purchases and sales of securities
es
banks (page 206); and prevention of deficienci
in collateral securing Treasury tax and loan
accounts (page 209).




904.
6/15/54

-13-

The Board would like to be informed also regarding any
further developments with respect to the missing
Treasury Certificates of Indebtedness amounting to
101,000, and as to the present status of the currency
destruction program.
Any additional comments you may care to offer regarding discussions with respect to the examination,
or as to action taken or to be taken as a result of the
examination, will also be appreciated.
Anprovad unanimously.
Letter to the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury Department, Washington, D. C., (Attention:

Mr. W. M. Taylor, Deputy

Comptroller of the Currency), reading as follows:
Reference is made to a letter from your office
dated April 5, 1954, enclosing photostatic copies of
an application to organize a national bank at Graham,
North Carolina, and requesting a recommendation as to
whether or not the application should be approved.
Based upon information developed in an investigation made by an examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank
of Richmond, it appears that the need of the community
for additional banking facilities is not sufficient to
warrant the establishment of a new bank. Graham and
Burlington, North Carolina, are adjacent and reported to
represent, in effect, one community with ample banking
facilities. The ability of the proposed new bank to
acquire sufficient business to assure profitable operations was considered doubtful and question was raised
as to the experience and competency of the proposed
management. In view of these circumstances, the Board
of Governors does not feel justified in recommending
approval of the application.
The Board's Division of Examinations will be glad
to discuss any aspects of this case with representatives
of your office, if you so desire.




Approved unanimously.