View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1020
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Thursday, July 8, 1954.

The Board met in

the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Vardaman
Mills
Robertson
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Vest, General Counsel
Marget, Director, Division of
International Finance
Sloan, Director, Division of Examinations
Noyes, Assistant Director, Division of
Research and Statistics
Tamagna, Chief, Financial Operations and
Policy Section, Division of International
Finance
Olson, Economist, Division of International
Finance

Chairman Martin read the following draft of letter to the
Secretary of State which had been
prepared for his signature pursuant
to the understandin
g at the meeting of the Board yesterday:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
has just approved the granting of a loan or loans on gold
not to exceed eighty million dollars in the aggregate by
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to the Banco do Brasil
as fiscal agent of the United States of Brazil. In approving this loan, the Board of Governors and the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York have expressly stipulated that
the loan should not be extended beyond an initial period
of ninety days.
This express stipulation with respect to the firm
ninety-day limit is based upon a considered appraisal of
the current and prospective payments position of Brazil.




1021
7/8/54

-2-

I have felt it desirable to call this matter to your personal attention in order to make clear that the decision
against renewal of the loan at the end of the ninety-day
Period will not be modified in the absence of very clear
evidence of a marked improvement in the payments position
of Brazil. The circumstances surrounding the application
for the loan and its consideration have been discussed
with Mr. Rollin S. Atwood of the staff of your Department.
I should be very glad to receive any comments which
YOU may wish to make with respect to this matter.
Chairman Martin stated, in this connection, that he had read
the proposed letter
to Mr. Sproul, President of the Federal Reserve
8ank of New York, who was agreeable to its transmittal.
There was further discussion of the matter during which Mr.
Marget stated that, as mentioned in the draft of letter, a
member of
the Board's
staff had discussed the request of Banco do Brasil with a
rePresentative of
the State Department who indicated that the DepartMent Would favor
the making of the loan for a three-month period.
At the conclusion of the
discussion, unanimous approval
was given to the letter from
Chairman Martin to the Secretary
of State in the form set forth
above, together with a telegram
to Mr. Davis, Assistant Vice
President of the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, reading as follows:
Your wire July 1. During meeting of Board at which
Messrs. Sproul and Rouse were present Board approved
granting of loan or loans by your Bank to the Banco do
Brasil as fiscal agent of the United States of Brazil
not to exceed $80 million in the aggregate on the following terms and conditions and with the clear understan
ding
that the loan or loans will not be renewed or extended
beyond the initial three-months period and that if any
request for further extension of the loan should be received, such request will not be considered unless there
is very clear evidence of marked improvement in
Brazilian
payments position:




7/8/54

-3-

(A) Each such loan shall be secured by the
pledge of gold bars held in your vaults of such value
that the principal amount thereof outstanding at any
time shall not exceed 98 per cent of the value of
such gold bars.
(B) Each such loan to mature not later than
three months after receipt by you of satisfactory
documentation which it is anticipated should be received before the end of August.
(C) Each such loan shall bear interest at the
discount rate of your Bank in effect on the date on
Which such loan is made.
As indicated in (B) of the above terms, it is
understood that prior to any advance of funds, you
shall require certain documentation through diplomatic channels, including affirmation by the Brazilian Government of the right of Banco do Brasil to
Pledge gold on behalf of the Government.
It is also understood that the usual participation will be offered to the other Federal Reserve
Banks.
This action was taken with
the understanding that Mr. Marget
would call Mr. Davis on the telephone and suggest to him that the
New York Bank's advice to Banco
do Brasil regarding the granting
of the accommodation be phrased
in terms that it was for a threemonth period, with no mention of
possible renewal beyond the initial
period.
Mr. Riefler stated that Mr. McCabe, former Chairman of the
130ar

called him on the telephone yesterday to discuss the Eisenh
ower

ellowship Program and to introduce Mr. Park, Direct
or of the Program,
lih0 wished to call at the Board' office tomorr
s
s
ow and would like to
°Iptain an expression of cooper
ation on the part of the Federal Reserve
System.
Mr. Riefler said that it had been arranged to have
about




1023
7/8/54

-4-

twelve foreigners visit the United States on fellowships for one year
each and that the directors of the program wanted to have six or seven
Americans go abroad for a year's study or for other work which was
appropriate to the needs of the respective individuals.

The persons

chosen to receive the fellowships would be of the highest caliber
available and preferably would be around

4o years of age. The employer

in the United States would continue to pay the employee's salary during
the year spent abroad, but the fellowship would cover all other expenses,
Which might in some cases include expenses of wives and families.

Mr.

Riefler said that the directors of the program would like very much to
have one of the fellowships go to some person within the Federal Reserve
System and that they would like to know whether the Board would agree
in principle.
In response to questions by members of the Board, Mr. Riefler
said he understood that the fellowships would be available to persons
in Private industry ana, inasmuch as only six or seven fellowships were
e nvisaged, he assumed that there would not be much Governmental representation.

He also said that he understood the Eisenhower Fellowship

Program would select the recipients of the awards, but that he would
have to
make further inquiry as to the exact method by which the choices
vould be made.
The matter was discussed and the members of the Board present
indicated that in principle they saw no reason why the Federal Reserve
5 stern should not cooperate in the program.




However, Governor Mills

7/8/54

-5-

pointed out that certain practical problems might be involved in
making available a suitable person from within the System.

With re-

gard to the situation at the Board, he noted that two members of the
staff of the Division of Research and Statistics already had been
granted awards which would involve extended absences from their
regular duties.
At the conclusion of the
discussion, it was understood
that Mr. Riefler would advise
Mr. Park that the Board had
agreed in principle to cooperation in the program on the part
of the Federal Reserve System,
recognizing that there might be
practical limitations on the extent of such cooperation.
Governor Mills referred to a letter addressed to him under
date of July 1, 1954, by Mr. Powell, President of the Federal Reserve
sank of
Minneapolis, discussing informally the plan of that Bank to
advance Mr. Franklin L. Parsons, Associate Director of Research, to
the

Position of Director of Research.

Mr. Powell's letter, written

in confirmation of his conversation with Governor Mills during the
'Meeting of the Presidents' Conference in June, stated that it was the
intention
of the Minneapolis Bank to take this action at the next directors' meeting, which would be held on Friday, July

9.

In reviewing the situation with respect to research personnel
at the
Minneapolis Bank, Governor Mills brought out that Mr. Parsons,




7/8/51+

-6-

a specialist in agricultural economics, enjoyed a good reputation in
that field and appeared to be a capable administrator.

Therefore, it

waS his view that the Board should interpose no objection to Mr.
Parsons' appointment as Director of Research.

At the same time, Gov-

ernor Mills considered it advisable to bring to President Powell's
attention the importance of strengthening the Bank's research staff,
Particularly in the area of monetary economics.

These thoughts were

embodied in a draft of reply to President Powell which Governor Mills
had prepared and which he read at this meeting.
At the request of Governor Mills, Mr. Noyes commented further
with regard to the research staff of the Minneapolis Bank and confirmea
Governor Mills' views to the effect that as a whole it was somewhat
weak in
comparison with the research staffs at other Federal Reserve
Banks.
At the conclusion of the
discussion, unanimous approval was
given to a letter from Governor
Mills to President Powell in the
following form:
Your favor of July l, in which you report your intention to make Mr. Franklin L. Parsons Director of Research of the Minneapolis Bank, has been discussed with
the Board and this letter represents its thinking. As
You know from experience and from your conversations here
at the time of the Presidents' Conference, the Board
Shares your wish that the research divisions of the Federal Reserve Banks be staffed with the best professional
talent that can be recruited. Mr. Parsons is highly regarded in his field and is considered a capable administrator. The Board is agreeable to his appointment as
Director of Research.




1026
7/8/514.

-7-

In view, however, of the number of senior economists
who have been lost to the System, the Board is somewhat
concerned about the problem of their replacement with
persons of comparable experience and intellectual attainments, especially in the field of money and banking. We
feel strongly that if the Federal Reserve System is to
retain the respect and confidence of both academic economists and leaders in the banking and financial community,
its principal research officers should include the best
trained minds in the country in the field of monetary
economics. Furthermore, as the economists at the Federal
Reserve Banks contribute through their various duties to
the formulation of System policy, this is of special importance.
Generally speaking, it is the Board's feeling that
either the officer in charge of research or his senior associate should be a man of outstanding qualifications and
reputation in that field. We sense from your letter that
the staffing plans you have in mind credit this viewpoint
and that every opportunity will be taken to develop your
research organization along lines that will insure its
most effective contribution to your Bank and the Federal
Reserve System.
The exchange of views initiated by your letter is
welcomed.
Messrs. Thurston and Noyes then withdrew from the meeting.
Prior to this meeting there had been circulated to the available
rrletlbers of the Board alternative drafts of letters relating to the request of the Grosse Pointe Bank, Grosse Pointe, Michigan, for permission
to

establish a branch at 630 St. Clair Avenue in Grosse Pointe.

One of

the drafts would state that after considering all available information
the Board of Governors concurred in the favorable recommendation of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and therefore approved the establishment
°f the branch, subject to the provisions (a) that the branch be established
Igithin one year, and (b) that plans presently under way to increase the




7/8/54

-8-

bank's capital structure by

$337,500 through the sale of additional

common stock be consummated on or before December 31, 1954.

The

Other draft, prepared in the form of a letter to Mr. Diercks, Vice
President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, reflected the views
Of Governor Robertson and read as follows:
Reference is made to your letter of June 2, 1954,
submitting the request of the Grosse Pointe Bank, Grosse
Pointe, Michigan, for permission to establish a branch
at 630 St. Clair Avenue in Grosse Pointe, Michigan.
In considering the request, the Board of Governors
has given due consideration to the bank's stated desire
to relieve congestion in its main office, but notes that
the branch now in process of being established at 93
Kercheval Avenue in Grosse Pointe Farms is only eighttenths of a mile from the proposed location at 630 St.
Clair Avenue. It would appear that the opening of this
branch would relieve some of the pressure on present
facilities. Consideration has also been given to the
statement that another purpose in proposing the new branch
is to enable the bank to maintain its competitive position
in the area. However, it appears that the bank actually
has no competition in the area.
The Board is in agreement with the statement contained
in your memorandum of June 2, 1954, that the soundness of
establishing three offices in such close proximity is
questionable, and it is not inclined to approve the bank's
request at this time.
Perhaps at a later date, after there has been an opPortunity to observe the results of the operation of the
branch presently being established and its effect upon
the main office congestion, the matter may be again reviewed, if the bank so desires at that time.
Governor Robertson stated reasons why he favored the approach
86t forth in the above draft of letter, drawing upon information contained in a memorandum from the Division of Examinations dated June 15,
1954

and information submitted to the Board with Mr. Diercks' letter of

June 2, 1954.




1028
7/8/54

-9At the conclusion of a
discussion based upon Governor
Robertson's comments, unanimous
approval was given to a letter
to Mr. Diercks in the form set
forth above.
Prior to this meeting there had been circulated to the available

members of the Board a memorandum from Mr. Sloan dated June 29, 1954,
discussing a proposal of The Pennsylvania Company for Banking and Trusts,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, submitted through the Federal Reserve Bank
of Philadelphia, under which the proportion of the risk assumed by the
Bank's wholly-owned affiliate, Colonial Surety Company, on automobile
insurance would be increased from 10 per cent to 20 per cent.

The memo-

randum referred, among other things, to the fact that in late 1950 the
Federal Reserve Bank

of Philadelphia advised the Board that the Colonial

Surety Company had commenced the issuance of fire, theft, and collision
insurance on
automobiles on April 1, 1950, the insurance written being
confined to vehicles financed by the bank and 90 per cent of the risk
being reinsured by the Indemnity Insurance Company of North America.
After consideration of the matter, the Board advised the Reserve Bank
°r1. March

7, 1951, that although it had a well-established policy against

Permitting member banks to engage in the insurance business, except as
Elgent, and although it did not look with favor on the practice of member
banks engaging in business indirectly through an affiliate which the
bank woUld
not be permitted to engage in directly, the Board would not
require the affiliate to terminate its activities in this case since it




1029
7/8/54

-10-

appeared that liability on the part of the bank was extremely remote
and that the risk to the affiliate was not disproportionate to the
amount of its capital structure.

On March

3, 1952, in response to a

request from the member bank, the Board interposed no objection to a
slight extension of the insurance operations of the Colonial Surety
Company, but again stated that it questioned seriously the propriety
Of a member bank's engaging, directly or indirectly, in the insurance
business.
Mr. Sloan's memorandum also referred to a discussion which
Governor Robertson and members of the Board's staff had on June 24,
1954, with Mr. William F. Kelly, Executive Vice President of The Pennsylvania Company for Banking and Trusts, at which time Governor Robertson stated the Board's policy, but advised that the matter would be
submitted for consideration by the Board and said that if it appeared
that the Board was not favorably inclined toward the proposal, Mr.
William F. Kurtz, Chairman of the Board of the member bank, would be
n°tified and given an opportunity to make such further representations
as he might wish.
While the recommendation of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia was that the current proposal be given favorable consideration,
it

Was

the recommendation of the Division of Examinations that the pro-

P°sal not be approved.

Accordingly, there was attached to Mr. Sloan's

MeMorandum a draft of letter to the Reserve Bank to that effect.

The

Memorandum suggested, however, that the letter not be forwarded until




1030
7/8/54

-11-

Mr. Kurtz had had an opportunity to make further representations after
receiving informal advice of the Board's tentative position.
Following a statement by Governor Robertson that he concurred
in the recommendation of the Division of Examinations, the other
members of the Board indicated
that they agreed with his position.
It was understood, therefore, that
Governor Robertson would call Mr.
Kurtz on the telephone, advise him
informally that it did not appear
that the proposal would be approved,
and inquire whether he wished to
visit the Board's offices for a
further discussion of the matter.
Secretary's Note: Subsequently,
Governor Robertson advised that
he had discussed the matter with
Mr. Kurtz by telephone, and that on
the basis of the discussion Mr.
Kurtz stated that The Pennsylvania
Company for Banking and Trusts would
withdraw its request and would so
notify the Board through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
At this point Governor Mills withdrew from the meeting to keep
another appointment.

Mr. Sloan also withdrew from the meeting at this

Point.
Chairman Martin referred to the discussion at the meeting of
the Board on June 17, 1954, regarding a letter dated June 10 in which
Mr— Albert M. Cole, Housing and Home Finance Administrator, invited
htn1 to attend a meeting on June 18 to discuss the voluntary home mortgage credit program which would be authorized by the housing bill now
lending in the Congress.
'




At that time Mr. Riefler was authorized to

7/8/74

-12-

attend the June 18 meeting as the Board's representative, with the
understanding that he would make no statement which would in any way
commit the Board with respect to the voluntary program.
Chairman Martin stated that last week a committee from the
Mortgage Bankers Association called upon him and presented reasons
why it would be difficult for the regional subcommittees which were
to be established under the voluntary program to operate effectively
in some areas unless the Federal Reserve Banks would provide facilities
for meetings at the Reserve Banks.

Chairman Martin said that he gave

the group no encouragement, but told them he would bring the matter
to the
attention of the Board.

He also stated that Mr. Cole had in-

dicated that he would like to call upon him this afternoon, presumably
for the purpose of discussing possible cooperation by the Federal Reserve System in the administration of the voluntary program.
The matter was discussed and, although it was the general view
or the members of the Board present that it would be preferable for
the Federal Reserve System not to become actively involved in the voluntary home mortgage credit program in any way, no definite conclusions
were reached.
Reference was made to a letter addressed to Chairman Martin
Under date of July 2, 1954, by Mr. Glenwood J. Sherrard, Assistant Director for Stabilization, Office of Defense Mobilization, in which Mr.
Sherrard invited the Board to participate in an inter-agency meeting
called for the purpose of establishing an Inter-Agency Stabilization




_4

7/8/54

-13-

Committee, the functions of which would be to discuss problems of
stabilization which might arise under different emergency contingencies,
to receive and make recommendations with respect to particular
programs,
and to serve as a means of communicating developments in this field
to
interested department heads.
Following a discussion,
the following reply from Chairman
Martin to Mr. Sherrard was approved unanimously:
This letter is in response to yours of July 2,
1954, relating to the establishment of a special inter-agency committee to serve as a focal point for
contact with ODM on stabilization problems.
Governor Robertson will attend the meeting on
July 14 and will represent the Board of Governors on
matters in which the Board is interested.
The meeting then adjourned. During the day the following additional actions were taken by the Board with all of the members except
Governors Szymczak and Evans present:
Memorandum dated July 2, 1954, from Mr. Marget, Director,
1D1vision
of International Finance, recommending that the resignation
01' Edward
Ames, Economist in that Division, be accepted effective
August 28, 1954.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Wiltse, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, reading as follows:
In accordance with the request contained In your
letter of July 1, 1954, the Board of Governors approves
the designation of the following as special assistant




1033

7/8/54

-14-

examiners for the Federal
Richard
Charles
Richard
Fred B.

Reserve Bank of New York:
J. Collins
S. Fleet
A. Lillquist
Whittemore

Approved unanimously.
Letters to Mr. Young, Chairman, Conference of Presidents of
the Federal Reserve Banks, c/o Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, reading
as follows:
This refers to the action taken by the Conference
of Presidents at its meeting on June 21-22, 1954, approving amendments to the Loss Sharing Agreement of the
Federal Reserve Banks, as recommended by the Insurance
Committee in its report of May 7, 1954, revising the
"Whereas" clauses and revising section 1(A) of Exhibit
A to the Agreement so as to include shipments of currency
and coin to and from member banks in Alaska and Hawaii.
The Board has approved these amendments to the Loss
Sharing Agreement. In this connection, the Board has received from the Chairman of the Insurance Committee a
Proposed revision of the Loss Sharing Agreement, a copy
of which is enclosed herewith, which would include these
amendments as well as the amendment adopted effective
April 17, 1952, with respect to war risk losses; and a
revision of the Agreement in this form is acceptable to
the Board.
It is understood that you will furnish copies of the
revised Agreement to the Federal Reserve Banks for execution and that each Reserve Bank will then forward a
duly executed counterpart original of the revised Agreement to the Board. When executed counterparts have been
received from all Federal Reserve Banks, the Board will
so notify the Reserve Banks by wire and, as provided in
Section XIV of the Agreement, the revised Agreement will
become effective as of the date of such notice.

At its meeting on March 1, 1954, the Presidents' Conference approved a recommendation by the Committee on Miscellaneous Operations that each Federal Reserve Bank review its present currency and coin services to member and
nonmember banks in order to determine if more uniformity
in such services should be achieved.




Ls i.

7/8/54

-15-

The Board is of the opinion that this is an important
matter. It is recognized, of course, that—because of differences in available transportation facilities, in the
geographical concentration of banks, and in other factors-there are certain situations where complete similarity of
services would be impracticable. On the other hand, it
would seem that in some instances the existing variations
would be hard to defend on a System basis.
The Board would appreciate it if you would initiate
the designation of an appropriate committee, or subcommittee, of the Presidents' Conference which would assemble
information showing (a) the full extent of the variations
among the Reserve Banks with respect to currency and coin
services; (b) the local situations or other reasons for
Practices which vary significantly from those of other
Banks; and (c) the objections--if any--to changes in the
direction of greater similarity. The Board would urge
that the committee complete this task as promptly as convenient with the thought that on the basis of the information developed the committee could recommend guiding
Principles which all Federal Reserve Banks might follow
in connection with their currency and coin services.
Although the committee of which Governor Robertson
is Chairman contemplates taking no action on this matter
Pending the completion of the proposed study, he will be
glad to confer with the proposed new committee at any time
that it might wish.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Home Loan Bank Board, First Street and Indiana
Avenue, Washington, D. C., reading as follows:
Recently two examples of advertising media issued
by Savings and Loan Associations have been brought to the
attention of the Board of Governors.
A pamphlet issued by the Second Federal Savings and
Loan Association of Cleveland, Ohio, contains a heading
in bold type on page 12: "Member of a Reserve Banking
System".
A small address and memorandum booklet issued by the
Hancock Savings and Loan Co., Findlay, Ohio, bears on
its face the caption: "Members of The Federal Banking
System".




?I8
It is clear that the use of the words "reserve
banking system" and "Federal banking system" will result in misunderstanding since they will convey the
impression that the institutions issuing statements
containing these terms are members of the Federal Reserve System. The Board of Governors questions the
advisability of advertising of this kind and would
appreciate the views of the Home Loan Bank Board as
to whether any steps can be taken to bring about the
discontinuance of statements of this nature.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated July 2, 1954, from the Division of Personnel
Administration recommending) for reasons stated, that the Board take
no action to prevent the continuation under the Board Plan of the Retirement
System of the Federal Reserve Banks of the benefits provided
for retired Civil Service employees by Senate Bill 2968, 82d Congress,
frOra July 1 1954, through June 301 1955.




Approved unanimously.

.41610.
Secretary