View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

2314
A meeting of the Executive Committee of the Federal
Reserve
13°411 was held
in 'Washington on Tuesday, July 31, 1934, at 11:00
Et. mi.

PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Ur.

Thomas, Chairman of the Executive Committee
Hamlin
James
Szymczak

hr. Lorrill, Secretary
Er. Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
The Committee considered and
acted upon the following matters:
Telogram dated July 28, 1934, approved by two members of the
Boa.rd, to
Governor
Fancher of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland,
r84dialp,' as
follows:
f :Your telegram July 27. Board
approves for your bank, efispre immediately, commitment rate on
industrial advances of
a"tO a/0 per annum, in place of rate of 1/2% to 1% per
annum
pproved by Board on July 9,
1934."
Approved.
Letter dated
July 26, 1934, from Lir. Sproul, Secretary of the
l'etieral

Reserve Bank of New York, and telegram dated
July 27, 1934,
*4", Stevens,
Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago,
both
advising that, at
meetings of the boards of directors on the
dates
stated, no
changes were made in the banks' existing schedules of
111'tec, of
discount and purchase.
Without objection, noted with approval.
Le44.a.anda
dated July 26, 1934, from Ur. Paulger, Chief of the
141113i011

of

Of Lass ci

'UXE31inatiOnS3

recommending that the temporary employment

aire C. Atkins, Miss Helene L. Kearney, and Miss Frederica




'051/34

-2G. Ritter,
as stenographers in the division, be extended for an addi-

tima thirty
days, at the same rates of compensation as their original
641133Vment.

The reconaendations were approved by two members of the

BOard on
July 27, 1934.
Approved.
Telegram dated July 27, 1934, approved by three members of the
Board
• to Mr.
Sargent, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal
70
Resel" Lank of San Francisco, stating that, subject to the conditions
15r"eribed in the
telegram, the Board approves the application of "The
?hoe,:
▪ Savings Bank 6; Trust Company", Phoenix, Arizona, for membershill 4
r -al the
Federal Reserve System and for the appropriate amount of
stock .
111 the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
Approved.
Two telegrams dated July 28, 1934, approved by two members of
the B
to 1.1r. Sargent, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent at the FedReserve

Darik of San Francisco, each stating that, subject to the
co4dit.
lcIns prescribed in the telegram, the Board approves the applica.of
"The Bank of
SP *sh Fork", Spanish Fork, Utah, and "The
Pi
-rst State
Bank of Kellogg", Kellogg, Idaho, respectively, for membership i
11 the Federal Reserve System and for the appropriate amount of
stock i
11 the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
Approved.
TeleCrom dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
:
°4rds to 1:1r. Austin,

Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve

Of
Philadelphia




referring to the application of the "Shamokin

2316
'0i1/34
"Baxikang

-3.-.

and Trust Company", Shamokin, Pennsylvania, for permission to
'with
.
drevrimmediately from membership in the Federal Reserve System,
414 8tating that the Board waives the usual requirement of six months'
Of intention
to withdraw and that, accordingly, upon surrender
Of the Federal
reserve bank stock issued to the Shamokin Banking and
Trust c,„
'
111ParlY, the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia is authorized
cancel such stock
and make a refund thereon.
Approved.
Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
13eard, t0
Bea

Wil iams,f

Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve

uz

ulevelmnd, reading as follows:

"Receipt is acknowledged of Mr. Fletcher's letter of July
.0
9s 1934, which
is in reference to the Board's letter of May 12,
,.4, advising of an extension of tine to July 15, 1936, within
1h36..oh 'The
Marengo Banking Company', Marengo, Ohio, ma - comply
.h.the
provisions of condition of membership numbered 17, which
vorte:ades that the bank shall, within three months from the date
th lts admission, reduce all excessive loans to amounts within
!11111ite prescribed by the laws of the State of Ohio. It is
1,?6e!1, that all of the bank's loans have been reduced to amounts
thln legal limits except the line of C. B. Smith; that the at21;
4n,113t to refinance this loan through the Federal Land Bank has
i,' an yet been successful, although negotiations are still pondp;g3.that the bank's available capital funds are inadequate to
ijmIt the
elimination of the loan through charge off without
r,'°einC a hardship on the institution; and that the bank has
t171quested a further extension of time within which it may reduce
2.8.11 to an amount
within legal limits.
ext
In view of all of the circumstances, the Board grants an
8annIsion of time to September 1, 1934, within which 'The Marengo
me
;
7
1 11g Company' may comply with the provisions of condition of
,
1,4
ere-4-13 numbered 17, and it is requested that you advise the
Ipa33k
accordingly."

1

;.

Approved.

Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
13".rdstmv..._
- 're Peyton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve




231_7
7/31/t4

-.4-

of L
inneapolis, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of July 12, 1934, transrtting the request of the 'State Bank of Belle Plaine', Belle
.18.111e, 1Linnesota, for permission to invest approximately
in
repairs and additions to its banking quarters.
lt
In view of your recommendation and the fact that the inyestment of such an amount does not appear to be unduly large or
improper or otherwise violate the spirit or purpose of condition
TImbered 8 Prescribed in connection with the bank's application
for
membership, the Board interposes no objection to such investmont n an
i: 6,500, and it is requested that
YO advise amount not to exceed ,;;
the bank accordingly.
.
'It is suggested that you acquaint the bank with the Board's
716172 whici are known to your office with respect to making adoate
provision for depreciation in banking quarters owned."
Approved.
Lotter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
Board, to
1,.r. LicClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
Ba'-uk of Ransae City, reading as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of July 18, 1934,

31e1.,yegard to the
activities of the International Trust Company,
Denver,
Colorado, in connection with the purchase and sale of so.
"It does not
appear that such activities are in violation of
the Fede
ral Reserve Act or the Banking Act of 1933 or that it is
0. e"arY for the Board or the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
'ltY t -ake any
action at this time in respect thereto."
Approved.
Letter dated July 28, 1934, approved by two members of the
Board, to
Of

Vialsh, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank
Lalia_,
reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of July 6, 1934, with its
irlo 10
Th..„ ,
sures, regarding your discussions with the managemnt of
Rio Bank and Trust Company, Del Rio, Texas, relative to
th: dItIrge-eff or elimination of estimated losses as sholm in
report ef examiri.tion of the bank as of March 28, 1934.
tvat?-ed losses as classified by your examiner amount to approxiclEt::Y
,24,900, and agree substantially with the total of losses
— 4-i ied by the State examiner in his report of examination as




2318
7/31/34

-5.

of the same date, where
as on the date of examination the bank
had no surplus accou
nt and undivided profits of only l,5OO.
You report that
the State banking department has taken the position that it
will not require the bank to eliminate its losses,
provided it sells at least 50,000 capital deben
tures to the
Finance Corporation. It is understood that the
lec
Reconstr
onstru
uction
ction Finance Corporation has agreed to purchase debentures in that amount. Mr. Evans lette
'
r of June 25, 1934,
to the bank stated that the Federal Reser
ve Board had taken the
Position that a member bank'
s published statements should reflect its true
condition, and that all losses should promptly be
eliminated, and requested the bank, there
fore, to eliminate the
losses estimated
in the report of examination. Mr. Evans further
stated that it would
be satisfactory to the reserve bank for The
'el Rio Bank and
Trust
Company to eliminate the losses by any one
of the
following methods:
1. Throu
gh an assessment upon, or a voluntary contribution
by, the stockholders.
2- Through an outri
ght purchase by the stockholders of the
assets classed as losses.
3. Through a
reduction of capital stock, after the sale of at
least an equal amount of debentures to the Reconstruction
Finance Corporation.
your letter of July 6, 1934, you state that you are of
the ()
Pinion that certain stockholders of the bpnl,are financially
able to
remove the bank's losses through a voluntary contribution,
recommend that they be called upon to do so, but request an
,:eression of the Board's views
as to whether or not you should
.Laisiet
tl upon this course of action.
pi
Capital notes or debentures issued to the Reconstruction
title-nee Corporation are not a reser
ve for losses, but are obliga0248 of the bank subordinated to the
claims of depositors and
sZner
creditors. Such capital notes or debentures are issued in
tores 'where the Reconstruction Finance Corporatio
n cannot extend
,
r_jthrough the purchase of prefe
rred stock. In States where
:4?:erred stock
is issued, a customary procedure is to issue sufso lent preferred stock to provi
de an adequate amount of net
thlruld capital and then provi
de for the elimination of losses
becough a reduction in common stock. It
is not believed that,
pi "se State
laws do not make it possible for the Reconstruction
itrace Corporation to purch
ase preferred stock thus necessitatpol„Ihat capital aid extended by the Reconstruction Finance Cor:
14L'ion be in the form
of capital notes or debentures, the banks
set_hat State should be permitted to carry losse
s in their as4,_thus
reflecting an inflated capital position.
lo_s "The
Board has consistently taken the position that estimated
al;
shold promptly be charged off or otherwise elimi
nated,
coliclithat a bank's published statements shoul
d reflect the true
per,Z-L°n of the bank. If the State banki
ng department does not
-"L" a reduction
in the common capital stock, and if the losses

1




2319
7/31/34

-6-

11

are not
eliminated by purchase, contribution, or assessment,
tIte bank, in order to show a true statement of condition, should
charge off
the estimated losses, and the bank's books mould
ore truly reflect the impairment existing in its capital
stle
tir
c
or.
"In answer to your specific question as to whether you
Should
insist upon the elimination of the losses through a volun"rY contribution, the Board feels that it is proper for you to
1.1,1sist that the
losses be eliminated, but that the method of
limination is a
matter for determination by the directors of
ej_bank, provided the elimination is
accomplished in a satisfactory manner
.
"The principles set forth in this letter are applicable to
other b anks in
similar situations, and in this connection reference is made to
your several letters of July 12, 1934, regarding
7,8-rictas banks miaich have not been required by the State banking
rpartment to charge off estimated losses inasmuch as capital
D_KItcs or debentures
sold to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation
u-re c
onsidered
by
the
State banking department as reserves for
losses.

Zp

6,

"The financial statements inclosed with your letter of July
1934, are
returned herewith."
Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the

130s4,3
tO
Bkrik

Ili-. Curtiss,
Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve

of Boston,

reading as follows:

"

in repReference is made to the Board's letter of March 7, 1933,
Bank ,Ard to the application of The Barnstable County National
Massachusetts, for permission to exereiaa gd-lu
i
=
8;101.1ere..s,
th
The Board has been advised by the
Comptroller's office
tia6 a new report
of examination of The Barnstable County Nae °11
,
1 Bank of Hyannis has just been received, in which
the
xelaner makes
the following comments
regard to application on file for permission to es-lalL a trust department the directors feel that at present
iof minor importance and that it mould be better to devote
all their
time towards getting the bank on a firmer basis betalking on nem- responsibilities.'
ite v In view of the foregoing information the Board will close
to ,
!
10 1?e in this matter. In the event the bank later desires
sholTari
:
l authority to exercise trust powers a new application




Approved.

2320
_7Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
Board, to
"The County National hank at Clearfield", Clearfield, Penntlivania, reading
as follows:
."The Federal Reserve Board has given consideration to your
aPPlleation for permission to exercise fiduciary powers, and
gr nts you authority to act, when not in contravention of State
or local
law, as trustee, executor, administrator, registrar of
socks and
bonds, guardian of estates, assignee, receiver, cornof estates of lunatics, or in any other fiduciary capacity
-Len which State
banks, trust companies or other corporations which
ome into
competition with national banks are permitted to act
Wider the laws
of the State of Pennsylvania, the exercise of all
ell rights to be subject to the provisions of the Federal Reserve
et and the regulations of the Federal Reserve Board.
This letter will be your authority to exercise the fiduciary
granted by the Board. A formal certificate covering such
authorizationt
will be forwarded to you in due course."

Z

Approved.
Letter dated July 26, 1934, approved by three members of the
Board3 4.
tdO the
"National Bank of Monticello", Monticello, Illinois,
l'eadirig as
follows:
a
,,,"The Federal Reserve Board has given consideration to your
t441cation for permission to exercise fiduciary powers, and
allts you authority to act, when not in
contravention of State
estiocal law, as
trustee, executor, administrator, guardian of
allates, and committee of estates of lunatics, the exercise of
'
Re zuch rights to
be subject to the provisions of the Federal
serve
Act and the regulCcions of the Federal Reserve Boord.
por
This letter will be your authority to exercise fiduciary
a4ers granted by the Board. A formal certificate covering such
hortization will be forwarded to you in due course.
t ,
The Board feels that, if you are tendered any of the trusts
e°11' held by
the First National Bank of Monticello, you should
of (leullY scrutinize their condition and should not accept any
'
41.6h trusts which, through their assumption, may be detrimenta,-L to the
interests of your institution."

g

Approved.
Lettor
dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
11(31
'cl, t0
IiicClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve




2321
'051/34
-8of Kansas
City, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letters of June 2 and July
18,
19_04, in regard to the application of 'The Central
National Bank
r Cobus', Columbus, Nebraska, for full fiduciary powers.
"The Board has reviewed the application and the data in connection
therewith, from which it appears that the bank's capital
and.surplus is only equal to approximately 6-1/2 per cent of its
.ZPoeit liabilities and that its surplus is but 10 por
cent of
s caPital as compared with the minimum of 20 per cent which it
:0-1 been the
usual practice of the Board to require of banks
receiving trust powers. ail° it is noted that the applicant
,, r115 le in a highly liquid condition, the Board feels that its
'claPatal structure is inadequate, as compared with the volume
of
and
should
be
materially
strengthened
before
the
bank
15
itlt:d to assume the additional responsibilities of a trust
.r&
"Your letter of July 13, 1934 states that the bank has adYou that no further consideration should be given to its
application in case favorable action thereon is dependent upon
71
increase in the capital at this time. The Board will, therefore,
treat the pending application as being withdrawn by the
'.21311eant bank and will close its file in the matter. Please ad5o the
bank accordingly."
Approved.
Letter dated July 26, 1934, approved by
three members of the
to
ttlid, t• O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading as
fol-

of 4, "In accordance with the recommendation of Acting Comptroller
Currency Await, the Federal Reserve Board approves a rein the common capital stock of 'The First National Bank
to "svalan', 14mnan, Georgia, from 250,000 to ;;125,000, pursuant
Fej
t Plan which provides for the use of the released capital toWith a portion of the bank's undivided profits account in
k3T
,
Ii73. ting unsatisfactory assets in an amount not less than
be_u,000, which assets,
together with assets which have previously
8.
2
,11 charged
off
are
to
be
trusteed for the shareholders, all as
4:"L. forth
in Mr. Analt's letter of July 13, 1934. The Board's
approval
is given with the understanding that the assets selected
4.ur elimination
have the approval of your office."
Approved.
Letter dated July
30, 1931, approved by two members of the




2322
7/31/3
4
Board, to Lir.
O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading as follows:
"In accordance with the recommendation of Acting Comptroller
of the
Currency Await, the Federal Reserve Board approves a relAction in the common capital stock of 'The Citizens National
31841k of Decatur', Decatur, Illinois, from $250,000 to $100,000,
u"uant to a plan which provides that the released capital shall
used to eliminate approximately Q134,000 of unsatisfactory
:lets and to increase the surplus account by approximately
V4°0°00, all as set forth in 1,1r. Amalt's memorandum of July 16,
4934."

t

Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
'LI• to mr.

O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading as fol-

ic:vs 3

"In accordance with Acting Comptroller Amalt"s recommenda• °112 the Federal Reserve Board approves a reduction in the
T°I
fl°n capital stock of 'The First National Bank in Tonkamat,
1,f','4aual Oklahoma, from $35,000 to Q25,000, pursuant to a plan
;"4ch provides that the bank's capital shall be increased by the
p:'111 °2 , 20,000 Class 'A' preferred stock to the Reconstruction
.21ance Corporation and f,;17,500 Class 'B' preferred stock locally,
that the released capital shall be used to eliminate a cor:813onding amount of unsatisfactory assets, all as set forth in
411alt's
memorandum of July 18, 1934.
H.
In considering the plan under which the proposed reduction
is t0 be
effected it was noted that the aggregate amount of de13creciation unprovided for will seriously impair the bank's common
tPital, even after giving consideration to the fact that securi_Y values have improved since the date of examination, and that
1faddition there will remain substantial amounts of assets clasled as slow or doubtful by your examiner. It was noted also
that
ta
at the
management of the subject bank was regarded as unsatisthet°rY by your examiner. It is assumed, homever, that you have
toT conditions in mind and that whenever it becomes feasible
prac
`L.oui
:
(
0)
.b/(
0)yill obtain such further corrections as may be

q

4

Approved.
Telegram dated July 28, 1934, approved by two members of the
}3eard t
' 14r. Newton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve




2323
7/31/34
1C of

-10Atlanta, reading as follows:

"Rotel July 26, 1934 regarding United Realty Company and
Nashville Trust Company voting permits. In view of facts set
'erth in
your telegram of July 26, 1934, the Board's ANCIGAR
telegrams
of July 25, 1934 are hereby amended to exclude paragraPh '2' of section ICI."
Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by three members of the
13°Ell‘c13 t° lir• Case, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank
Of liew
York, reading as follows:
A
"There is inclosed herewith a copy of a letter from
irthur Watson, 55 West 42nd Street, New York, New York, requestcertain,_
information with respect to a proposed application
'°? the Tropical City Ice Company, Inc. for a loan under the proof section 13b of the Federal Reserve Act.
You will note that the Tropical City Ice Company, Inc.,
iTle or ganized under the laws of the State of New York operates
8 Plant at Ponce, Puerto Rico. Section 13b authorizes a Federal
reserve bank to make loans thereunder only to 'an established
.tdlistrial or comnereial business located in its district'; and
c 13, therefore, the view of the Federal Reserve Board that no
fl?11 loans may be made by a Federal reserve bank to businesses
Lollfot located in
any Federal reserve district, but located outside
c. the continental United States. Accordingly, it will be appreprted if you will ascertain -whether the Tropical City Ice Comcr nY'.Inc., is a business not located in any Federal reserve
1,1strict
and, if such is the case, it is requested that you advise
Watson that a loan may not be made to that company under the
,
erIns of section 13b. If after consideration of this matter with
ur counsel you are in doubt as to whether the Tropical City Ice
4,anY, Inc. is a business located in any Federal reserve distoT and you feel that the case is one upon which it is advisable
wil
'
'
I a„7 an expression from the Federal Reserve Board, the Board
ce glad to consider the question if you will submit all per,'nent information together with an opinion of the counsel for
Your
batk with respect thereto."

e

Approved.
Letter dated July 28, 1934, approved by two members of the
d, to
Lr. Logan, Deputy Governor and General Counsel of the FedOx'q
Reserve Bank
of New York, reading as follows:




2324
7/31/34
-11Receipt is acknowledged of your telegram of July 26, 1934,
!.(Ivising that the Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New
.10rk have
authorized and requested you as General Counsel of the
00.11k to consult
with Honorable Newton D. Baker concerning certain
legal questions in
connection with the agreement proposed by the
Secretary of
the Treasury with the bank regarding payments which
the S
ecretary is authorized to make to the bank under Section
t3b of the
Federal Reserve Act; that you have been in correspondence with Lr.
Baker and he was in New York and conferred with
you and
with certain of your directors and other officers, and
4.,at, in view of the Board's letter of February 15, 1926 (X-4531),
"Lie Federal Reserve Bank of New York will request the
Board's approval of the
payment of la.. Baker's fee should it exceed 0.,000.
this connection, your attention is invited to the fact that
the Board
in its letter of February 15, 1926, requested that,
4before
employing a special attorney whose services are likely to
1J,117°178 an expenditure by the Federal reserve bank in excess of
:
'
,1 °°0
: the matter be submitted to the Federal Reserve Board with
r°Tlest that the Board approve of the payment of compensation
vc hlm up to a
stated amount."
Approved.
Telegram dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
13card, to
lir. Viood, Federal Reserve A7ent at the
Federal Reserve Bank
(:)1
'St.
Louis, reading as follows:
1144 "Your wire July 26. Referring your
first question which is
4.,,erstood to relate to transaction in which financing institulon advances
at least 20 per cent of working capital and Federal
:rserve Bank
the remainder as contemplated by first proviso of
vo :
l agraPh b of section 13b, there is in
Board's opinion no legal
sVection to Federal Reserve Bank
selling to such financing intritlItien obligation evidencing amount reserve bank has advanced
-013ylded such sale is
without recourse to reserve bank on such
Imak gatien. Also no legal objection to Federal Reserve Bank then
a commitment to discount or purchase entire amount of the
celZillal loan from financing institution at a
later date provided,
20 „e
,c)ur
"
, financing institution obligates itself for at least
ycj
ier cent of any loss thereon as required by law. Referring
:second question, no legal objection to Federal Reserve Bank
cf '111g without recourse to
financing institution entire amount
or nllgation discounted for
or purchased from such institution
co 'du Federal Reserve Bank then
making a commitment again to discbl!
i °r Purchase such obligation provided financing
an
institution
reo ?Ates itself for at least 20 per cent of any loss thereon
as
Peered by law. Advisability of any such action on part of
eral
Reserve Bank is question for consideration of directors




2325
-12ft

and officers of your bank."
Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of tho

13°ard, to
ivir. Thomas R. Dwyer, President of The First National Bank
Bald
Trust Company
of Rochester, New York, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of July 11, 1934, inclosing a
!
()PY of a Demand served upon your bank by Lr. Lartin 11011, Trustee in
Banla-uptcy of the Long and Shafer Company, Inc., demanding
t you treat an account standing in his name as Trustee in
trruptcy as an interest-bearing savings account. You state
that it is your understanding that the funds in such account are
_ e proceeds of
the liquidation of L:eng and Shafer Company, Inc.,
;nd that
it does not appear to you that the funds in question are
0.
,
114;
1_8 accumulated for bona fide thrift purposes within the meaning
l'he definition of savings deposits contained in Section V(a)
of the
Z Federal Reserve Board's Regulation Q.
From the information which you have submitted, it does not
appear
that the deposit in question consists of funds accumulated
bona
fide thrift purposes, and, if not, it may not properly
be
,c
classified
lassified as a savings deposit for the purpose of paying intfest
v
thereon. However, the Board believes that the question
Alther deposits may be considered funds accumulated for bona
th,,,e thrift purposes so as to constitute savings deposits within
eel
;meaning of the regulation is one upon which no general rule
lun„'? Prescribed and that each case must necessarily be determined
-" the basis of its particular facts. The Board also feels that
as to whether deposits may be regarded as funds accumula'Eni°118
ze
?u, for bona fide thrift purposes should be considered by the
l,cer banks in
the exercise of their best judgment and in the
iet of the provisions of the law and the regulation and that
tni,
wculd not be Tiracticable for the Federal Reserve Board to under0,76 to determine such questions as they may arise in individual
e:!ses with member banks when deposits are offered to them. Howtgr, the Board has
set forth in the inclosed statement some of
ter c
onsiderations which it feels may possibly enter into a dede Ill-illation of the question whether deposits constitute savings
tj
csits within the msning of Regulation Q. It is hoped that
y;;!! general statements set forth therein may be of assistance to
classifying the deposits in question.
co
, In the event you have not already done so, you may wish to
de"elder suggesting
to Lr. L:oll the possibility of converting the
qt(
)
11?it in question into a time deposit as defined in Regulation
sps,,tch is payable more than thirty days after date or with re-' to which thirty days' notice in writing of intended with-

r




2326

7/31/34

-13-

It A

uraws.ls is required. If this were done, of course, interest
might be paid on the deposit in accordance with the
provisions
of the
regulation."
Approved.
Letter dated July 26, 1934, approved by three members of the
- +
-0 rar. Austin, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
13exit

Of Ph
iladelphia, reading as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of July 6, 1934,
!Irl°13ing a copy of an opinion by your counsel to the effect that
Payment by the First National Bank of Birdsboro, Pennsylvania,
of the premium
on a surety bond furnished to secure a deposit payOn demand made with that bank by the directors of a school
.1strict would constitute a payment of interest on such deposits
!-_11. violation
of the provisions of section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act
which prohibits the payment of interest by a member
culank, directly or indirectly, on any
deposit which is payable on
teTalld. This opinion was rendered in response to a request conin the Board's letter of March 22, 1934, with which was
1,-4-Losed a copy of a letter from the First National Bank, Birdsboro,0,
ennsylvania, dated February 19, 1934.
Re
Upon the basis of the information submitted, the Federal
b serve Board finds no reason to differ with the opinion expressed
counsel for your bank with respect to the matter; and, accordit will be appreciated if you will advise the member bilk
co,r?Ply to its inquiry on the subject in accordance with his
ha"elusions. In this connection, it is assumed that your counsel
dee given or will give consideration to the question whether these
02"its may be deposits of public funds made by or on behalf of
• Y State,
county, school district or other subdivision or munic,,
P,
e'lltY with respect to which payment of interest is required
;;T: State law and, therefore, excepted from the prohibition of
one,
1°11 19 of the Federal Reserve Act upon the payment of interest
ueposits payable on demand."

T

Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
13°41sci' CO LI.. Austin,
Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
441C
of Phil
adelphia, reading as follows:
refers to your letter of June 28, 1934, in regard to
er the
a national bank of savings accounts
solicitation
In violation of
the provisions of the Board's regulations. It




2327
7.4'34
2-8 assumed that you refer to the Board's Regulation Q, relating
O tITI
Payment of interest on deposits.
The Board understands that the bank in question has engageda firm of solicitor's whose representatives make a house to
nouse
canvass of prospective depositors, explain the services of
the -ank to
such persons, and attempt to induce such persons to
urchase an electric clock or other article for the price of
n
"•v0. The representatives provide each such purchaser with a
card instructing him to go to the bark
and open a savings account,
411(13 if the balance in any such account which may be opened is
'lop or more one
year from the date of its opening, the bank credl-cs to such
account an amount equivalent to the purchase price
Paid by the
depositor to the solicitor for the article. In addi'Ion to such credit, the
bank also pays interest on the account
at the
regular rate.
t. "Although the Federal Reserve Board feels that
the solicita1°11 of accounts by a member bank in the manner described is an
111.1desirable practice and that such buying of business should be
."Jscouraged, it does not appear that such practice is in viola_1°11 of the provisions of section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act
or of the
Board's regulations relating to the payment of interest
On
deposits. Since the donation made by the bank is a fixed
r
;unt
and does not vary with or bear a substantially direct relatIs n to the amount of the depositor's balance, it is
believed
111T-t the
solicitation of accounts in the manner described does
I°.t involve an indirect
payment of interest within the prohibition
of sal
•d
section 19 or of the Board's Regulation q."
Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
to LIr.
O. L. McDonough, Cashier of The National Bank of Clays11'14
'ClaYsville, Pennsylvania,
reading as follows:
of the Your letter of June 8, 1934, addressed to the Comptroller
Currency, regarding the renewal of matured certificates
of
deNsit
has been referred to the Federal Reserve Board for rePly.

eu , It is understood that in view of the fact that many of the
claZL'eMers of
your bank are unable to get into town on the exact
to'
e
i_ Of the maturities of their certificates of
deposit, you wish
del3'e advised whether
you may lawfully renew a certificate of
sit prior
to its maturity, dating the now certificate as of
the
thatdate of maturity of the original certificate. It is noted
are YoU state that all certificates presented after
maturity
041,rnelwad as of the date presented, and that interest is paid
co the date of maturity of the
original certificate.
uPon the basis of the information submitted it appears that




2328
7/31/34
-15the
e practice which you suggest involves merely the making of a
Ifau contract of deposit with respect to the funds in question which
Is to take effect
on the date of maturity of the original certificate and that no
part of the funds evidenced by the original cerTricate is withdrawn until the maturity of the renewal certificate.
til?re is no provision of law which would preclude the adoption of
18 procedure and the Federal Reserve Board has no objection
t
hereto."
Approved.
Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by_two members of the

481rd, to Lr.
George R. Craig, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, reading as
foliol‘mt

"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of July 5, 1934, in
i.
eth You state that the regulations of a national bank which
TPP'Y to savings deposits provide, among other things, that 'The
:".1-st interest which has been credited to the account may be
Althdrawn
at any time without notice, upon presentation of the
PRSS book'
, and that, 'If interest is not withdrawn, it will be
dited to the account and compounded, regardless of whether or
yoL. the Pass book shall have been presented for entry therein'.
,u request to be advised whether the payment of interest on the
e
s_art of a
savings account which represents interest credited on
account at the expiration of the last preceding interest
Period
yeriod is lawful.
es
, "If the part of the savings account which represents interof
'
Pxlieviously credited on the account conforms to the definition
ti a savings deposit' which is contained in the Board's Regulab °11 q3 interest may lawfully be paid thereon, even though the
021k PernitS the withdrawal of such part of the account on demand.
1111
,svisver, one of the essential attributes of a 'savings deposit'
J-cluithat the
'depositor is required, or may at any time be rethe bank to give notice in writing of an intended
not less than 30 days before a withdrawal is made'.
of 71ew of that requirement, the payment of interest on a portion
subai. savinCs deposit for any period during which such portion is
1111,7eet to Payment on demand COMBS within the prohibition of the
against the payment of interest on any deposit payable on

n

n

"APPlying such principles to the instant case, it does not
s4eTear that a depositor is required to give, or that the bank reIlot.78 till) right to require, notice of intended withdrawal of
reb:ess than 30 days in respect to the part of the account which
rj:esents the last interest credited thereto, and if the amount
wiTsenting the last interest credited to the account may be
drawn on demand, the payment of interest thereon for the
a
„




2329
VW34

-16-

'period during which it is so subject to repayment would constitutea payment of interest on a 'deposit payable on demand' and
would be unlawful."
Approved.

Board
111013.d,

Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
4.
1.1r. Wallace, Counsel for the Federal Reserve Bank of Richreading as follows:

This refers to your letter of June 5, 1934, addressed to
Board's General Counsel, inclosing a copy of a letter written
by
uy you to the First
rational Bank of Holly Hill, South Carolina,
:14ith respect
to the payment of interest on deposits of funds held
by the county treasurers of South Carolina as sinking funds for
various school districts.
"It is noted that you have advised the member bank that the
(11)13(3
in question could not be treated as savings deposits but
that they
might be accepted either as time deposits, open accounts,
.7 as time certificates of deposit, and that, if so accepted, interest might
be paid on such deposits at a rate not exceeding 3%.
as provided in Regulation Q. You also advised the bank that, in
Y°11r °Pinion, the payment of interest on such funds is required
under the 1
w of South Carolina and that, therefore, such funds
,
11,11):.Y be accepted
as demand deposits and that interest may lawfully
0
1 Paid
thereon. It is understood, however, that you -wish to be
trised of the Board's view with respect to the question whether
to ,PaYment of interest is required under State law with respect
wITI funds in question.
It appears that Section 5365 of the Code of Laws of South
"
f°1ina for 1932, which you cite in your letter to the bank, re.cgtres the treasurers of the counties in which the school districts
O the are situated to deposit all money in their hands belonging
co
,
sinking funds of the various school districts in their
of—,;ties in some saving institution or bank approved by the Board
ustees of the school district 'at the best rate of interest
that
dir call 130 obtained * * * and the said treasurers shall, at the
ection of the Board of Trustees, change the place of deposit
shZ1Y times Provided, that in making such deposit preference
or
given to a bank, or banks, located within the township
derecnultY, in which such school district is situate.' It is u11rel8t°°d that there is no other provision in the State statutes
srXinC to the payment of interest on such funds. After considQuo ::°11 of this question on the assumption that the deposits in
130a8':ion consist of public funds of the school districts, the
yourVinds no reason to differ from the conclusion reached by
seb flat the
payment of interest on deposits of sinking funds of
'4°01 districts in South Carolina is required under the law of




2330

v31/34

-17-

"that State, and
that, therefore, interest may laufully be paid
bY c.t member bank on such deposits, even though the deposits
are
Payable on demand."
Approved.
Letter dated July 28, 1934, approved by two members of
the
Board.,
to hr.
O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading as foliolm:
Jul I.:This refers to
the memorandum from Li.
. . F. G. Amalt, dated
Y .L6, 1934, in regard to
whether a certain deposit in the
iOfl
National Bank of liarquette, Yichigan, may properly be clas3J-fled as a 'savings deposit' within
the meaning of Regulation Q.
.
"Prom the facts submitted it mould appear that the deposit
question consists of funds of a business enterprise which are
teMP0rarily idle and that such deposit comes within the principle
et forth
in the second sentence of the fifth paragraph of the
2!
I d's letter to the Comptroller
F
under date of April 28, 1934,
relative to
the administration of the requirements of Regulation
in respect
to savings deposits. However, there may be other
;
j !kets mtich are
unknomn to the Board and mhich mould justify a
12.fferent conclusion, and the Board feels
that the information
submitted is not adequate to enable
it to determine the question
at th
is tine.
as "The question whether such deposit may be properly
classified
f1,2,
1 savings deposit is a doubtful one, and, consequently, if the
4:"us mere
deposited as a savings account in good faith and not
an attempt to
evade the prohibition of the statute against the
,
41
,_ent of interest on deposits
payable on demand, the Board will
Object to
the payment of interest on such account until such
ell
"as the Bank may be
notified that the deposit may not be so
illas.?ified. It is assumed, of
course, that the deposit complies
to 114 respects
with the requirements of Regulation Q applicable
consrings deposits, with the possible exception that it may not
s't of funds accumulated for bona fide thrift
purposes.
,,
Inasmuch as an examiner ordinarily has an
Of
intimate
knowledge
e situations
existing in his particular jurisdiction, it is
felt
quenjhat he is usually in a better
position to pass upon close
tlons of this kind, which depend
upon a full understanding of
411
be i he facts of
the case, than the Federal Reserve Board would
faetil acting upon a brief and perhaps inadequate statement of
v.v.:* Accordingly, it mould seem desirable that
the examiners
careful consideration to auestions which may arise in the
oxf banks as to whether funds are accumulated for bona
ezd t,"rlft Purposes, in the light of the Board's Regulation Q
ref "e Principles stated in the Board's
letter of April 28, 1934,
erred to ab ove .It

T




Approved.

2331
7/31/3.1

-18Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the

Board, to

Await, Deputy Comptroller of the Currency, reading as

follows:
,
This refers to your memorandum of July 23, 1954, in regard
tO
whether certain deposits made by The Northwestern Loan and
Trurit Company
in the Brown National Bank of Kenosha, Viisconsin,
1
1 1 Properly classified as 'time deposits, open accounts'.
,
Although the exact meaning of the written contract evidencliag such deposits is not entirely clear, it appears that the
'
8 reclilent is in the form of a continuing contract covering domade from time to time, from -which withdrawals are perTitted from time to time. It is
understood that it is the in:frit of the
agreement
that
no
deposit
made under such agreement
flay be
withdrawn prior to the expiration of a period of thirty
daYs from the date
the deposit is made; that in the event withj7141 is not made of a particular deposit at the end of the
b
day period from the date of such deposit, such funds shall
e considered as having been redeposited for another thirty day
Period, and likewise redeposited for each and every thirty day
period thereafter until
withdrawal is made; and that no deposit
lay
be withdrawn except at the expiration of a period of thirty
Ye
'
ttor multiples thereof, after the date of such deposit.
If the foregoing interpretation of the agreement is proper,
' lc the vievre the Board that deposits withdrawable only at
timetimas and under the conditions stated may be classified as
:le
deposits on which interest may be paid in accordance with
th!tProvisions of the Board's Regulation ;. however, it is felt
may be advisable to revise the agreement so as to clarify
-Lntent and indicate clearly that deposits made thereunder
, subject to withdrawal at the times and under the conditions
e taated.”
Approved.
Letter

dated July 26, 1934, approved by three members of the
13°41.d, to
1.-x. Austin,
of the Federal Reserve Bank of PhilaclelPhia,

reading as follows:
llows:

1),,ur letter of Juno 23, 1934, to Mr. Hamlin with reference
t° the
the ,,'°ardi s letter X-7848a, dated April 4, 1934, regarding
J-icY to be followed with respect to the charge-off or
'
ef
nation of depreciation in securities as shown in the reports
ere
!
xamination of State member banks has been carefully considu
the Board.
the charge-offs outlined in the Board's letter are




OgI4'19
'
,J./tic/15,w

7Aa/3

-19_
,

E,reater than have been prescribed as a rule for national banks
In current
operation and by some State 13anki.1g Departments,
Particularly the Pennsylvania Banking Department, they are the
same as those Prescrib
ed for the admission of State banks to men1)er 14
and they are not greater than those frequently prescribed
?..n connection with the reorganization, rehabilitation,
or reopening
of,national banks or in connection with the conversion of
°tate banks into national banks. In fact, in many of these
°aces the Comptroller of the Currency requires the elimination
of
practically all criticized items. The Board feels that the
1)
3elleY set forth in its letter is sound and that, while it mould
e desirable for all banks, member and non-member, to be subject
to the
sarre requirements regarding charge-off or elimination of
?t?..mated losses and depreciation, the Board's primary responsi-111tY is for State member banks and that it is fair to prescribe
1?r them
the same standards prescribed for State banks for admis810n to membership
in the system. This point has been the subject
.euf certain correspo
ndence in the past in which the Board has taken
position that whenever possible it will endeavor to bring
/yl nobservance of similar
standards by existing members.
mi
flol?Itar.irc
out
that
Policy,
example, in connection with
for
votlng
.
permits to holding company affiliates the Board ordinarily
Prescribes
as a condition that the subsidiary banks shall make
.13 !fge-02fs corresponding to those required for admission of State
cLal to
the system.
a, /It is recognized th.At in some cases the Federal reserve
aloInts will meet special situations which will require diplomacy
tact and that it may not be practicable in all cases to obt 111 full compliance with the Board's policy outlined in the
letter X-7848a. lor these reasons the letter did not
Proscribe
b() that the standards outlined must be met in all cases
deviation, but stated rather a general policy which it
!
8 desired shall
be followed as far as possible. It is hoped,
'
cZertheless,
that the various Federal reserve agents will use
haerY effort, diplomatically, tactfully, and yet earnestly, to
why° the
State member banks in their districts follow this policy
iiieh is believed to be sound and which will result in thepub11,,shed statements of conditions of the banks reflecting more
nearly
the true condition of their assets."

t

;M

Approved.
1304rd,

Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
te

aoxton, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Rich-

'141d,
reading as
fol1ow-52
"The
oard has reviewed the report of examination of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond made as at the close of business




2333
v31/34

-20-

"April 28, 1934, copies of which were left with you and Governor
Seay.
"On page 12 of the report the examiner calls attention to a
circular sent by the Reserve Bank on harch 5, 1934, to all member
?anics in the district advising them that your Executive Comrittee
had decided
that it would be desirable to have future borromings
from the Reserve Bank made in the form of the member banks' own
II°tes secured by eligible paper and requesting that member
banks
nake their
future borrowings in that form rather than in the form
re
discounted notes. It will be appreciated if you will advise
e Board with respect to the present requirements regarding the
lUse of
member banks' collateral notes and as to the reaction of
"le member
banks to the Reserve Bank's circular of March 5, 1934.
tt,
After the report mid this letter have received the considation
of the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank, the
Board
would appreciate advice from you as to what action has been
'd-4en or mill be taken
on the various matters discussed."

.0,f

Approved.
Letter dated July 30, 1964, approved by two members of
the
j3c4ard to 1_
'0
"Jonnor, Comptroller of the Currency, reading as followe I

It
4eCeipt is acknowledged of your letter
of July 9, 1934,
etner with the correspondence attached thereto, in regard to
tihe
Taestion whether a national bank may lawfully make charges
11
,
1 exce.ss of the limit fixed in the first paragraph of section
'
0
- of the
Federal Reserve Act for collecting checks drawn on
lat-oFt-town banks.
In a letter under date of February 12, 1927, the Federal
Reserve
board expressed the view that 'national banks have the
• Vt to make reasonable charges not to exceed 10g per hundred
011J-J.ars or
a fraction thereof for the collection or payment of
lactrks, the only
limitation being that no such charge shall be
in ,. 1"ainst a Federal reserve bank'. Subsequently, in a case
tic:''Ich it appeared that certain member banks were in the practhe;
.- °f makin,°...: charges in excess of 10 per a00 or fraction
de * e°f for cashing out-of-town
checks when presented by nonsX1litor s, the
Board ruled that 'Under the express terms of
13 of the Federal Reserve
Act, a member bank may not in
thLne.4.r flake a charge in excess of 10 per i100 or fraction.
•
based on the total of checks and drafts presented at any
pod 1711e, for the collection or payment of checks', and that 'the
•
make
eral Reserve Board is not authorized to permit member
banksto
chargeS in excess of that amount'.
ule_
that t3
in such rulin7s, it is the view of the Board
law limits the amount of charges which may be made by a
tO

4




2334
7/2a/34

-21-

Motional bank for the collection of checks drawn on other banks.
inver, when checks handled for collection are drawn on non-par
,
a4k8, any exchange charge which may be made by the drawee bank
4er the .
Payment of a check need not be included when computing
the charge
which may be made by the collecting bank under the
r
P
e:Ins
of law to which reference has been made, since such an
charge
rnnot properly be considered a charge made by the
c
ollectin

r

Approved.
Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
ii°e'rd
'to the Attorney General of the United States, reading as fol-

t . "There is inclosed herewith an excerpt from a letter received
1O Federal
Reserve Board from the Assistant Federal Reserve
cit at
tho Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, which raises
_l question whether a person authorized to engage in the business
vi
receiving deposits, but not now engaged in accepting any deP
l its, is required by section 21(a) (2) of the Banking Act of
to submit to periodic examination and to make and publish
vcrio ic
reports of condition.
t.
it is the view of the Federal Reserve Board that said seca (
(3/1 21()
‘2) does not embrace a person who has not been engaged,
June 16, 1934, 'in the business of receiving deposits subject
totc!
sl
cateueek or to repayment upon presentation of a passbook, certifi,1_ -° of deposit, or other evidence of debt, or upon request of the
,
,
,
:positori, even though such person was engaged in such business
.)
:111.0br to
° that
date. Consequently, the Board feels that the fact
that
is authorized to engage in such a business is not
„,'lcient to bring such person within the scope of the provisions
el 4.1:zssion, and that the person who is the subject of this
who is not presently engaged in the business of remai lring
dePosits
is not required to submit to examination and to
tind
Publish reports of condition.
liar:Dyer, since an expression of opinion by the Board would
not
youjTevent a prosecution for violation of such provisions if
above"ePartment should take a view contrary to that expressed
yo„Ire2 it will be appreciated if you will advise the Board whether
e\oncur in its construction of the provisions of said section
(a
st )(2), and whether it is necessary for Spiridion Furcich of
ptleon, Pennsylvania, to submit to examination and to make and
flat 18h Periodic reports of condition so lon7 as such person does
(2)j;ceept deposits of the kind referred to in said section 21(a)

r




Approved.

2335

7/31/34
-22Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by three members of
the
Board, to
.
Lr. liewton, Federal Reserve Agent at the
Federal Reserve
Bank

0f Atlanta, readin

as follows:

"ieference is made to
your letter of July 3, 19,4, concernin
g -ae scope of examinttions to be made of
private banks or
bankers
under the provisions of Section 21 of the Banking Act
1933. You state that in many instances private bankers who
-ave expressed a preference to
be examined by the Federal Reserve Bank are engaged in other agricultural,
mercantile, or
Tanufacturing
activities, and that, while they probably attempt
O
segregate the asscts pertaining to their banking operations,
fl.e) lam of
the State of Georgia are such that, in case of inSolvency, all assets would be pooled for the benefit of all
.ejeditors, and the depositors, therefore, would have no lien on
so-called banking assets. In
the circumstances, you request
0.113truetions as to whether the
examinations should cover all
t!!Gts and liabilities of the private
banker, or only those per" ning to the banking
operations.
he Board is advised that the laws
of the State of iiew York
r
eequire every private banker to
invest in the business permanent
ol
ftPital in stipulated amounts, and provide for
the segregation
capital and of deposits received and the assets acquired
thr8uch
804.0ugh the
investment of such funds, and, further, that the asof
'
s so acquired will be first available
to satisfy the claims
cutdePositors. Similar laws are said to be in force in Connectiz
erch perhaps, other States. Where such laws exist, it would
s,tat
the examinations required under the provisions of
balTibr?en 21 of the Banking Act
of 1933 should be confined to the
operations
of
the
private
banker, whether or not he has
prrr aLss
et,s and liabilities. Where the banking assets of the
a4 Ilate banker, however, are available to
satisfy the claims of
dj, and all creditors, and in the
event of insolvency unsecured
torsitors would be on an equal footing with
other general credias,a1 it muld appear that, in addition to an examination of the
oz.r's and liabilities arising from the
banking operations, the
ttj_na.tion should include such investigation of other assets
u li
abilities as is necessary to determine the true condition
°f the bank.
the Board's letter of June 26, 1934 (X-7936) it was
stated
port- that inasmuch as, under the terms of Section 21, all re°f condition are to be made and Published at the same times
;manner
nn
and with like effect and penalties as are
Yr1°.1%e(71T law in respect of national banking associations
tio
,
etinC business in the same locality, such reports of condiTaav'In all cases, and without regard to the authority -which
/11824
'
the examinations referred to in Section 21, should be




4->c1.1
t_it 111

7/31/34

made to the Comptroller of the Currency and published in the
same manner as reports of condition of national banks. In the
ci
rcumstances, it is within the power of the Comptroller of the
Currency to prescribe the form of such reports. Presumably, the
Purpose of examinations under the terms of the section is to dothe true condition of the bank, verify the accuracy of
such reports of
condition as may be made, and disclose any irregularities that
may be subject to penalty. Therefore, the
matter has been discussed with the office of the Comptroller of
the
Currency to ascertain the Comptroller's requirements with
respect to the form of the report of condition by private bankers,
and with a view to the adoption of reasonably uniform procedure
in the
examinations conducted by the Comptroller of the Currency
alla the examiners for the Federal Reserve banks under the terms
Of Section 21.
In connection with the call for reports of condition as of
JI-Inc 30, 1934, the Comptroller forwarded to private bankers the
.
13
;-1'.'4 form (Form 2130 - Call Ko. 340) that was forwarded to na;',-°nal banks. This form includes the items 'Other assets' and
Other liabilities'
and provides for the itemization of such assets-,
and liabilities under schedules '12 and
which are not a
statement to be published. It is probable that a
Parteeorfo-tf;heinstructions will be forwarded to private bankers by
al41!.Comptroller at the time of the next call for reports of cona"len, advisine; them that they should list under the item 'Other
038ets t all assets other than those pertaining directly to banking
ra ions, and under the item 'Other liabilities' all liabilities
Other
than those pertaining directly to bankdng operations. Some
'si°73. may also be made to provide for a statement of the outaid,,..4
fox,' 17prth of partners in cases involving partnership. The form
co reports of condition is revised from time to time, and, of
rou se, the Comptroller may find it necessary or desirable to
ofIrlso the general form or to prepare a special form for reports
plinte baalkers in connection with future calls.
Comptroller of the Currency concurs in the Board's opiniOn that
examinvtions under the terms of Section 21, where doareZ
on the same footing as other general creditors,
t Iljd include an examination of the assets and liabilities perai,"-kng to the banking operations of the private banker in the
')a.Me
manner and to the samc extent as if an examination were bemade of a national bank or a State member bank, and that the
ner should conduct such further investigations or examinat
as may be necessary to satisfy himself as to the accuracy
of
cot:Y statements made with respect to other assets and the
otale n.?" of the values represented thereby, or the extent of
iabilities of the private banker.
S stated, the Comptroller of the Currency may find it
co,
IJ Elr'd or desirable to prescribe special forms for reports of
may tion of private bankers, and, likewise, future experience
Indicate the necessity for more detailed and exhaustive

Z

I\

-23-




2337
7/31/3z1
-24,
e-40-minations. In any event, all
examinations under Section 21
() the BankiLg Act of 1933 should be conducted with the fact in
1d that the
interests of depositors are inextricably intermingle with those of all
other creditors v;herever such interests
are not
specifically segregated by law."
Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
k)ard, to 1,4.. h.
ward, Cashier of the 1;ational hank of Flint,
Plitt, Lichigan,
reading as follows:
th
ihis refers to your letters of June 1 and June 27, 1934,
reGarding the
necessity of depositing in the trust department of
Your bank
securities approved by the Federal Reserve Board to seec, re a certain savings
deposit in such bank. You state that
_rter such
deposit vas made the depositor requested the trust
cateiyartment to act as agent for him in the handling of certain
t fairs, but that the trust department has no authority except
Ite bt as agent solely under the instructions of the principal.
t,
Section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve Act provides in part
'*
* Funds deposited or held in trust by the bank awaitinvestment
shall be carried in a separate account end shall
flot be
used by the bank in the conduct of its business unless it
:
• 111 first set aside in the trust department United States bonds
se Other
securities approved by the Federal Reserve Board.' Subti etical 1:)) of Section
of the Federal Reserve Board's RegulationI') provides that funds received or held in the
trust departe• nt
Of a national bank awaiting investment or distribution may
be deposited
in the commercial department or savings department
the Lank
to the credit of the trust department, provided the
first delivers to the trust department certain kinds of securif;
as collateral.
the B t will be noted that these provisions of the Act and of
vest °Erd's regulation apply only to trust funds 'awaiting in
jaent or distribution'. It is understood that the funds hold
s department of your bank were deposited therein
tzia:o1;setsoanielg appointment of the trust department as agent for
the lepositor, and, if the agreement between the depositor and
be .trust
department provides that such funds shall continue to
0t1111117ested in the savings department until the
depositor directs
eL t
e?
r iss, it would appear that such funds should not be regarded
nieali
:
- tist funds awaiting investment or distribution within the
Act lng of the provisions of Section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve
r
qUired of the Board's Regulation F and that your bank is not retrust '° deposit United States bonds or other securities in its
department to secure such funds.




2338
7/31/34

-25-

"Your statement that the bank holds in its possession the
Pass book evidencing the deposit referred to raises the question
Whether the retention by the borOr of the pass book comes within
.he scope of the inclosed ruling by the Board in Which the view
le expressed that a deposit in respect to which the pass book
or other
form of receipt is retained by a berk or by an officer,
"Ployee, or agent thereof, rather than by the depositor, does
not comply with
the requirements of Regulation Q in respect to
88"."nge deposits. However, the information which you have sub.
1b-Itted is not sufficient to enable the Board definitely to de;lane the question at this time. Consequently, if you desire
tIlf Board to consider mhether the retention of the pass book in
a: Situation to which you refer is permissible under the law
nd the
Board's regulations, it is requested that you furnish
e 13c)ard with copies of all documents evidencing the agreement
between the
bank and the depositor, and submit such other inferas may be pertinent to the inquiry. If so desired, names
amounts may be omitted from copies of any documents furnished
60 the
Board."
Approved.
Letter dated July 26, 1934, approved by three members of the
Boaxla
to lir.
Wood, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank
Or

St. 41ais, reading as follows:
heference is made to your letter of July 17, 1934, regardexaminations of State member banks in connection with the
leicluired certification to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporacr,". and requesting authorization to make such examinations
`'ra%cing October 1, 1934.
octet The Board feels that reports of examination made as of
er 1, 1934, or subsequent thereto, may properly be used as
%basis for certification in connection with applications of
poe:
!
;e member banks for the purchase of stock in the Federal Decos
'
t Insurance Corporation prior to July 1, 1935, provided, of
betIrs°, such reports indicate that a thorough examination has
1 made and fairly represent the condition of the banks at the
IV of certification. Before making final recommendations with
liZrd to certification, therefore, it will be expected that you
ar -L review the reports of any examinations made prior to Janu'1935, for the purpose of determining whether, since the
daLl
or ii°f examination, there has been any change in the condition
doub2° bank which mould render the question of certification
In case of doubt, either as to whether the condition
of
cori7, bank as reflected in the report of examination warrants
liication to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or
vale,t'ller there has been any subsequent change in the condition of
/ig

t4.!1




2339
7/31/ 4„
-2611,
the bank which would raise a ouestion as to whether the assets
?F the bank
are adequate to enable it to meet all of its
ties to
depositors and other creditors, another examination
ShOUld be made to serve as a basis for the required certification.
It is assumed that the program of examinations will be so
arranged that
wherever possible examinations of banks dependent
uPon seasonal liquidation will be made subsequen
t to the liquidation period."
Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by three members of the
Board, +,
-" idr. Peyton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
Bank of
Linneapoli
s, reading as follows:
,
heference is made to your letter of July 12, 1934, inclos, copies of
a farm which it is proposed that your examiners
will
ash all officers of State member banks to sign, while exare in progress, for the purpose of developing, inferba'ion with reference to loans to executive officers
of member
iianks subject to
the provisions of Section 22(g) of the Federal
erve Act. You request connent with regard to the form itself
Your Policy in requestin that
the form be completed.
g
,,
is
It
assumed that the form is not expected to develop all
Of
banc
,
'
-° information needed in connection with loans by a member
of 't° its own executive officers, but to disclose the existence
ti such loans
which may be made the subject of further investigab °" Use of the form should also facilitate the determination
LYour examiners whether loans to the executive officers by
a_aer banks
have been duly reported to the chairman of the board
equired by Section 22(g), and with these statements available
other informati
on as may COM to your attention through extl;unation of other banks or other official sources may be checked,
be s reduoin the amount of correspondence that otherwise might
required.
It is evident that the first
an
of such statements filed by
icer may contain information that would not be necessary in
the:tee-Lion with subsequent statements. Therefore, it is suggested
forms be used, one for the initial statement, and the
other
re
forsubsequ
ent statements. The inclosed copies have been
od in accordance with this suggestion.
are self-explanatory, except that inasmuch
a
zott ullicer may have created and extinguished indebtedness to
22 (el: or nonmember banks since the effective date of Section
edtt;
'
,'') and may, in the future, create and extinguish such indebtriellt-S from time to time between the dates on which such statethe s (Ire filed, the additional information to be developed in
added column, 'Date Paid', would be pertinent.

Zi

4

r




2340
7/31/34

-27n It

is believed that a form such as you suggest could properbe used and would be helpful in developing the information
equired in determining whether the provisions of Section 22(g)
have been
observed".

ly

Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
13°ard, to
Mr. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
13
Ll* of Chicago,
reading as follows:
, "On June 12, 1934, you were advised by telegram that per'WOre being issued to certain individuals under Section 32
If the Banking Act
of 1933 to serve the Harris Trust and Savings
and The H.
Harris Company, both of Chicago, Illinois.
:
ISuch permits mere made effective until June 16, 1934, it being
erstood that, on or before that date, The N. 14. Harris Company
would_be in
liquidation.
The information which has been received shows that the
17Pita1ization of the company has already been reduced to the
4.°111inal amount of $1000, and indicates that the number of direc'
.bT1
:8 has been reduced to three, all of whom are directors of
Harris Trust and Savings Bank. The information also shows
that,vi
in addition to the liauidating dividend of $1,500,000
thich was paid out of the assets of the company in January of
.
t 8,Year, a further liquidating dividend of 41,500,000 was con0V4Plated on or about July 1, 1934, and that, after the payment
such dividend, the company will have assets which will probabalresProduce between $200,000 and $400,000, but which the company
ires to liquidate slowly in order to avoid sacrificing their
be "In order that the Board's files may be complete, it will
Ra aPPreciated if you will advise the Board whether The N. W.
rris Company has been placed in liquidation as contemplated."
Approved.
Nara,

Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the

to Lr. George S. Hovey, President of The Inter-State National
Bozic,,
44:11Sas City, Missouri, reading as follows:
let„ "The Federal Reserve Board acknowledges receipt of your
of July 20, 1934 regarding the application of Er. R.
oiv!Y Tinsman for a permit under Section 32 of the Banking Act
433 to serve as a director of The Inter-State National Bank
—4 as an officer of Prescott, Wright, Snider Company, both of




2341
7/W5A

-28-

xiansas City, idssouri.
1 You refer to the Board's letter of July 18, 1034, and
state that you will now understand
Tinsman may be reelected
;;Th4.of your Board unless you hear from the Board to the
As was pointed out in the Board's letter, if 1:r.
11 8
n man has ceased to be an officer and a director of the Prescott, iright,
Snider Company and his relationship to the company
ls not in a managerial capacity, Lii.
Tinsman may be reelected
a member
f=oard without his relationship to the two intitution
s:
-within the Provisions of Section 32. On the
Other hand, if
hr. Tinsman is still acting as director or offIcer of the
i'rescott, Tfright, Snider Company or is serving that
eallTany in a managerial capacity, his service as a director of
ur bank comes within the
scope of Section 32 and a permit will
necessary.
since
the Board has not been informed as
However,
to such
steps as L. Tinsman may have taken to bring his rela1°nshilD to your bank and the .croscott, Yiright, Snider Company
11"0 c
ompliance with the requirements of the law., the Board is
unab10, to
make any ruling in the matter.
You also state that you understand if Lr. Tinsman remains
a director
of your bank you will not be permitted to make adileements to the Prescott, V.right, Shider
Company based on
ocks and bonds
as collateral. You apparently refer to the
:
31trt of the Board's letter in vhich your attention VIVX invited
TiOn the provisions of Section 8A of the Clayton Antitrust Act.
al.reference
to that section was made in connection with such
i..
rve,lvities,
if any, of the Prescott,Wright, Snider Company and
the
letter, activities of your bank. As was pointed out in the
t; the Prescott, fright, Snider Company makes loans
Secured
stock or bond collateral in connection with margin
ceunts or otherwise, service by Lr. Tinsman as a director, oficor
or employee of that company and as a
director of your bank
„ 1 corm within the prohibitions of Section SA, even though the
4.1°17isions of Section 32 no longer apply to his relationship to
IpaZttwo institutions. It is suggested that you discuss this
toa;!rt with the Federal Reserve Agent,
the Federal Reserve
s
5 local representative, at the Federal Reserve Bank of
--)8- City."

r

r
1

Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
13°ard/ to
Hoxton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
411k of
IZichmond, stating that the Board has given consideration to
the f°110wing
application for a permit under the Clayton Act, and
that
ilpon the
basis of the information before it, feels that the




2342
7/31/34
-29Of the permit applied for would be incompatible with the public

interest.

The letter also requested the agent to communicate to

the a
pplicant the Board's position in the matter, and to advise the
130ard
promptly as to whether the applicant desires to submit any addi'4°1341 data, and,
if not, as to -what steps he proposes to take in order
t° e°41PlY with the provisions of the Clayton Act.
Lr. Tacker G.
Loundes, for permission to serve at the
a director and
officer of The Second National Bank
±and, Cumberland,
Laryland, as a director and officer
kiumberland Savings hank, Cumberland, Liaryland, and as
officer of The Lomndes Savings and Trust Company,
ieSt
Virginia.

same time
of Cumberof the
a director
Clarksburg,

Approved.
Letter dated July 28, 1934, approved by two members of the
Board, t
an applicant for a permit under the Clayton Act, advising
Of

aPProval of his
application as follows:
L7'
-Is Jones, for permission to servo at the sare time as a
rc!_ir
or and officer
of The First Lational Bank of Dalton, Dalton,
" ooteorgia,
and as a director of the Cohutta Banking Company, Chatsworth, Georgia
.
Approved, together with a letter, also dated
July 28, 1934, and approved by
two members of the
Board, to Lir. e-1.4ton, Federal Reserve Agent at the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, reading as follows:
Per"There is inclosed for your files a copy of the Clayton Act
to init issued by the Board to Lir. L. Id. Jones, Dalton, Georgia,
Laj
erve at the same time as director and officer of The First
Baritnal tank of Dalton, Dalton, and as director of The Cohutta
C°mPany, Chatsworth, both of Georgia.
fro
4/1 considering the application of Lir. Jones, it was noted
th
examination report of The First National Bank of Dalton
that
,a69 -Loans to
officers, directors and their interests amounted to
debt:!;?0
'
Some of which were scheduled as slow or loss. The in1934:'"ess of Lir. Jones to the national bank as at April 16,
The 0-mounted to13,529.70, of which amount 0,375 was secured.
examiner stated the unsecured portion was purely a moral risk,




2343
7/31/34
-30in view of the fact that the estimated worthof Er. Jones was
Only C;2,500 and his annual salary was only 0.,785. This heavy
and u
nsatisfactory line is, of course, also a matter for criticism of the
management of the national bank. The examiner of the
State , ank reported
that bank to be in a weakened condition, with
ai sound capital of
only :12,(.,00. It Was also noted that lir.
les attended only three of the fifteen directors' meetings of
ae State bank during the past year.
It appears that the banks regard hr. Jones' experience as
"
Linable, especially in connection with real estate and credits
1.1 the communities served by the banks; that his counsel and adare needed and sought by the banks; that he is held in high
, steem _
by the banks' customers; and that you knuu of no reason
hts
service would be other than helpful to the banks.
In the circumstances, the Board felt that it would be preferable to
grant this permit in order to avoid any unnecessary misunderstanding by the communities which might
prove detrimental to
tl
i le best interests of the banks, but it suggests that you endeavor,
fl
cooPeration with the chief national bank examiner of your di:3tict, to
bring about the necessary corrections of the matters
to above. The Board also desiros that when you ssubmit
your
iyeu
p r.recommendations as a result of your annual review of this
anr"You report fully as to the progress made in bringing about
1mProvement in these matters."

7

130€1.rd

Letter dated July 28, 1934, approved by twp members of the

t° an applicant for a permit under the Clayton Act, advising
"aPPr
°val of his application as follows:
dir "' C, Liartin, for permission to serve at the same time as a
ector and
officer of The First National Bank of Dalton, Dalton,
aeorpi
as a director and officer of The Bank of Dalton, Dalton,
and as a director of The Bank of La Fayette, 1,c1 Fayette,
'/eorgia.
Approved, together with a letter, also dated July
1934, and approved by two members of the Board, to
Newton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
ank of Atlanta, reading as follows:
r
Inere is inclosed for your files a copy of the Clayton Act
Pteorlilit issued by the Board to Lir. 1, C. :artin, Dalton, Georgia,
444
1erve at the same time as director and officer of The First
Of Dn
T1 Bank of Dalton, Dalton, director and officer of The Bank
pal I'"on, Dalton, and as director of The Bank of La Fayette, La
Je bte, all
of Georgia.
In considering Lir. Liartin's application it was noted that




2344
7/31/34
-316n- two Dalton banks which he is serving are in active competition for practically all classes of business, :r. 1,1artin being
president of both institutions, and that there is one other
bh8
ank in the community, a nonmember State bank. The examination
report of the national
bank as at April 16, 1934, showed officers,
directors and their interests to be indebted to the bank to the
extent of A.69,000 as compared to a capital structure of ;„)146,000
after the
elimination of depreciation in securities, doubtful asSet5 and
ses. Of these borrowings, Li-. Lartin owed the bank
Personaiiy;14,342.75 and his interests owed it y77,551, of which
,
'
2 3"16 was scheduled as slow and ,/7,742 as loss. lie also owed
T he1. ..,Bank
of Dalton personally ;
f r1,626.95, and his interests owed
li7
a „ 16,029.b2, of .which :,;10,724.52 was scheduled as slow. It
i4-vears that the criticized loans were those of the Cherokee LAnu,G_urinS Company and the Dalton Property Company and that La-.
/ raej
'
ln was
1;ar
these companies. It was also
of
cted that president of both of
L. '.,artin had attended only three directors' meetings
th° La Payette bank during the last two years. In granting
the
a,',Permit the Board took into consideration the fact that the
10431J-cant had been prominent in the affairs of the two Dalton
tanLs, and had been connected with banking interests in La Fayette,
or
YE)ars; that his services were said to have resulted in no rerletion of credit or lessening of competition; that your confer!
Inoe with the applicant on Larch 7, 1934, developed the inforabazlon that the
applicant intended to consolidate the twc Dalton
2114a within the succeeding twelve months, and that the steady
Ice
oopery in
collateral values supporting the loans of his interests
uldn ultimately
result in no loss to the banks.
elle In the circumstances, the Board felt that it would be prefer,,to grant the permit in order to avoid any unnecessary misunder'
thesarlding by the communities which night prove detrimental to
cent interests
of the banks but it suggests that you endeavor,
cl,c1:0?Peration with the chief national bank examiner of your
bee riot, to bring about a correction of the matters which have
vihen criticized
by the examiners. The Board also desires that
reirli You mabmit your recommendations as a result of your annual
bri,n of this permit you report fully as to the progress made in
-60-ng about an improvement in these matters."
Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
Board, to
Of approv

111. aPplicant for a permit under the Clayton Act, advising

al cr hi

application as follows:

a ,;.rrank" 00dy, for Permission to serve at the same time as
of L
re
l et°r of the Birmingham branch of the Federal Reserve Bank
Of TL-anta, Birminrham, Alabama, and as a director and officer
"e Pirst lAational Bank of Tuskaloosa, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.




APProved, together with a letter, also dated

2345
7/31/34
-32July 30, 1934, and approved by two membe
rs of the
Eoard, to La.. ewton, Federal Reserve Agent at the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, reading as follows:
"There is inclosod for your files a copy of the G1ay'6
on Act
permit
issued by the Board to Lx. Frank I.'. Iloody of Tuscaloosa,
labama, to serve as director and officer of The First
National
!:,41.nk of Tuska
loosa
Tusca
,
loosa
,
and
direc
as
tor
of
Birmi
the
ngham
Eranc
Alabalfed
m
eral Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Birmingham, both of

t

"1n consi
dering hr. Moody's application it was noLed that
th0
national bank examiner considered that The First Rational
it,nk of
Tuskaloosa was still in an unsatisfactory condition,
i ter eliminating estimated losses and making certain adjustments
i C onnection with
its recapitalization with the assistance of
O
Reconstruction Finance Corporatio
n; that the examiner stated
management needed to be reorganized or strengthened;
_flat the
directors were 'reasonably strong' but President Moody
zully doni
nated all phases of the bank's operations; that it was
rill' °Pinion the appli
cant could not be held wholly responsible
for the
of
the
bank as his domination of the detail
r
:
rations
was done in a spirit of helpfulness and viith a feeling
17.1j
esponsibility
to the bank, and that the condition of the bank
-inlprove as busin
ess conditions improve.
1fl the
circumstances, the Board felt that it would be
P'oforable to grant the
permit in order to avoid any unnecessary
tollderstanding
by the community which night prove detrimental
he
yo
,
best interests of the Tuscaloosa bank, but it suggests that
0,' endeavor, in coope
ration with the chief national bank examiner
J,.-)rour
district, to bring about a strengthening of the management
?- correction
of the conditions -which have given rise to the
criticisms. The Board also desires that when you subth,_Your recommenda
tions as a result of your annual review of
tlitpermit you repor fully
t
as to the progress made in bringing
TusealZi
a-mEa
r7
l ynt in the management and condition of the

Z
j

Letter dated
July 26, 1934, approved by three members of the
Board, to
bctilk 01, CI
:. Stevens,

Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve

1"Zo, reading as follows:
to tHReceipt is acknowledged of your letter of July 16 in regard
ser e Clayton Act permit granted
to 1,r. James T. lacLillan to ,.
reo;" as a director of the Iiational Bank
of Detroit and as a aiha,, 7
1 ,0f the Detroit Savings Bank, Detroit, Michigan. The Board
tr;
n:ed with interest the correspond
ence of which copies were
--Ilatted with your letter and in view of the situation descr
ibed




2346
7/31/34

-3311.
in that
correspondence and your recommendation the Board is
to continue in effect until the January election of dif*,ectors of these banks the permit granted to Mr. hichdllan.
s will avoid the necessity of his
resigning as a director of
m.le of the two
banks and the situation can be met, it would seem,
ut any unnecessary embarrassment by an arrangement by which
successor will be
elected by one of the banks at its January
oleo+.
-10n- Please advise Llr. KcEillan and the banks to this effect."

:itho

Approved.
Letters dated July 27, 1934, approved by three members of the
Board
to
aPplicants for permits under the Clayton Act, advising of
aPProval
of their
applications as follows:
Ir- a r
Batman, for permission to serve'at the same time as
Ltidirector and
officer of The First National Bank of Bloomington,
.720mington, Indiana, and as a director and officer of the Citi'
48 Loan & Trust
Company, Bloomington, Indiana.
14r. Hays
H.
t!:0l director Buskirk, for permission to serve at the same time as
and officer of The First National Bank of Bloomington,
T-0mington3 Indiana, and as a director of the Citizens Loan &
ru8t Company, Bloomington, Indiana.
Jul APproved, together with a letter, also dated
Y 27, 1934, and approved by three members of the
..uoard, to Ir. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, reading as follows:
pe,. 4L0re are inclosed for your files a copy of the Clayton Act
It
'
aTlt issued by
the Board to Lr. Ira C. Batman, Bloomington,
covering his services as director and officer of The
Of gational Bank of Bloomington, and as director and officer
to
Citizens Loan and Trust Company, and of the permit issued
vien
Hays H. Buskirk, Bloomington, Indiana, covering his serBC4.as director nna
officer of The First National Bank of
paliv()rallgton and as director of The Citizens Loan and Trust Comoth of
Bloomington, Indiana.
perti+F°r your confidential information in connection with these
sf_ the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation report of
'
exami
1934i021
Of The Citizens Loan and Trust Company as of lamh
25,
eecu,
:Q4, showed doubtful assets and estimated losses, including
diirrtAies depreciation, considerably in excess of surplus, unwas i3-6 Profits and reserves. The report indicated that the bank
that :tng dominated to the fullest extent by the cashier, and
"
El InanageMent was considered unsatisfactory inasmuch as the




2347
v31/34

-34-

'I
burden vras believed to be too heavy for him. The examiner recommended
that a capable man be obtained to assist in the management of the
institution.
"Although both banks have recently strengthened their capital
structures by the
sale of preferred stock and/or debentures to
Re construction
Finance Corporation and to local interests,
eY are still not free of criticized assets as indicated by current e
xamination reports. The management of the national bank
4PPears to rest
almost entirely with Vice President and Cashier
StUll.

r

"In view of these facts the Board feels that further efforts
iaiould be
made to remove the causes of the criticisms and suggests
at You
endeavor, in cooperation with the appropriate supervisory
uthorities to bring about a strengthening of the management and a
improvement of the condition of the banks involved. The
desires also that when you submit your recommendations as a
result
tosll t of your annual review of these permits you report fully as
the progress made in bringing about an improvement in these
m
atters."

Z

Letters dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
13°1/rcl
'to LT.
Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
41111z of
Chicago, referring to the following applications for permits
141d" the Clayton Act, and stating, in each case, that, upon the basis
cle the 4
4-nformation before it, the Board feels that the issuance of the
Perzit
applied for
would be incompatible with the public interest.
i]cteh
letter
also requested the agent to communicate to the applicant
B
oardt s
position in the matter, and to advise the Board promptly
113 t° -whether

the applicant desires to submit any additional data, and,

it llot, as to
1,Jhat steps he proposes to take in order to comply with
the provisions
Of the Clayton Act.
us Babcock, for permission to serve at the same time as
conzi-ficer and director of The Wood County National Bank of lasdireIT Rapids, lasconsin Rapids, iiisconsin, as an officer nnd
-oor of the 1:e1oosa State Lank, Nekoosa, Wisconsin, and as
a4 °fricer and
director of the Farmers & ILerchants Bank, Rudolph,
seonsin.
1,1r. L„
,

C. Wittig, for permission to serve at the sane time as a




2348

v31/34

-35-

director and officer of The Wood County National Bank of Wisconln Rapids, Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and as a director of
the Vesper
-Arpin State Bank, Vesper, Wisconsin.
Approved.
Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
130ard, t,
'
an applicant for a permit under the Clayton Act, advising
c):e4PPreva1

of his application as follows:

John L. Alexander, for permission to serve at the same time
a director and officer of The Wood County National Bank of
ilsconsin Rapids, Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and as a director
alid officer of
the Nekoosa State Bank, Nekoosa, wisconsin.
Approved, together with a letter, also dated
,
J111,Y 30, 1934, and approved by two members of the
?oard, to Li-. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the
vederal Reserve Bank of Chicago, reading as follows:
:There is inclosed for your files a copy of the Clayton Act
rriat issued by
John E. Alexander of Port Edthe Board to
ards, Viisconsin, to serve as director and officer of The Wood
c°
01111 Y Lational Bank of Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin Rapids, Yds-,1141n, and director and officer of Nekoosa State Bank, Nekoosa,
"18consin.
"In considering las. Alexander's application it was noted
that
zi
his loan of v13,000 at the national bank was criticised as
eni°71 'tad his loan of %?7,239.33 at the State bank MS included
as.°11(i; loans especially mentioned. Loans by the national bank
oreCating approximately ,,e82,000 to the Nekoosa Edwards Paper
1711
of which the applicant is the general manager, were
ered to be an undue concentration of credit although the
3.114111111ner stated that
this company should experience no difficulty
Iretinc these obligations. It was also noted that a loan of
palY86s62 by the State bank to the National Carbonic Lachine Comlos'in Inhich the applicant is interested, was classified as a

rj

Luc applicant, his family and interests, however, made
largo'
re
contributions to the national bank in order that it might
alaurne business following the banking holiday. The applicant is
re,0 reported
to have a large net worth, appears to be highly
thel.dcd and is the representative of the largest industry in
th_Le crilmunity. In view of these circumstances, the Board felt
it would
be preferable to grant the permit.
'fle beard desires that when you submit your recommendations
"a
full result of your annual review of this permit, you report
Y"to tho current status of the borrowings of ILI-. Alexander




2349

/
1
21/34

-36-

his interests at the national bank, and whether such borrow"gs constitute an abuse of the credit facilities of the bank."
Letter dated July 30, 1931, approved by two members of the
Board, to
an applicant for a permit under the Clayton It, advising
qaPproval of his application as follows:
14r. -"O. Steel, for permission to serve at the same time as a
director and officer of The First National Bank of Eldon, Eldon,
as a director and officer of The First National BRnk of
Centerville.,_, Centerville, Iowa, and as a director and officer of
the Iowa
Trust & Savings Bank, Centerville, Iowa.
Approved, together with a letter, also dated
July 30, 1931, and approved by two members of the
Board, to Lir. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, reading as follows:
nr
by theihere is inclosed a copy of the Clayton Act permi.c, issued
Board to L. w. 0. Steel, Centerville, IOWA, covering his
ices as director and officer of The First National Dank of
B °11, Eldon, Iowa, director and oiTicer of The First National
4,!Lit' of Centerville, Centerville, Iowa, and as director and of.tlcerof
u
the Iowa Trust & Savings Bmik, Centerville, Iowa.
In the consideration of br. Steel's application it was
ed that the
examination report of The First National Bank of
a4don shcved that the management was weak and the condition was
Tigigravated by lack of attention on the part of the directors.
LaZ.national bank examiner in his remarks concerning The First
sert.Bank of Centerville states that a period of future ob111,_"'"'lon will be required to determine whether the present
iza6eraent is capable of carrying on the capable and efficient
IC;31211ont which that bank enjoyed in the past.
the ,
t;The Board suggests that you endeavor, in cooperation with
alef Lational Bank Examiner of your district to bring about
a Stren
.
g lienlng
of the management and fuller cooperation of the
yodirectors in
both national banks and also suggests that, when
ofut1
73.nlit Your recorrmiendation as a result of your annual review
Permit, you report fully as to the progress made in
c.-4/Ig about an improvement in the manac.ement."

V

r

Bottra,

Letter dated July
27, 1934, approved by three members of the

41.11k 0::

PGYton, Federal Reserve A,7ent at the Federal Reserve

411noapoli3, reading as follows:
Reference is made to your letter of July 12, 1931, with




2350
7/31/34

-37-

was inclosed a letter dated July 11, 1936, from Mr. R.
Barron of idinot, North Dakota, relative to the Clayton Act apPlication of La... Barron for permission to serve as director and
cfficer of First National Bank in Janet, idnot, and as director
Of First
State Bank, Burlington, North Dakota.
"The Board has given consideration to the matters set forth
in Ix. Barron's letter of July 11, 1934, addressed to you, but
!till feels that
the issuance of the permit applied for would be
3.1.1conTatib1e with the public interest. You are requested to adse the applicant accordingly.
It is noted that Mr. Barron states that it is his intention
to re,.
:gn
-i
as a director of the First State Bank of Burlington.
lie7n
Barron has broucht his relationships into conformity
.'1741 tIle provisions of the Clayton Act, please advise the Board
ln order that its
records in this case may be complete."
Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1034, approved by two members of the
13°Erd, t
rl.
o --•

13atic

p

eyton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve

of lanneapolis,
reading as follows;

ihere are inclosed the Clayton Act permit, and copies
,Gre°17,
'
)
'
issued by the Board to Mr. Louis G. Kaufman, Yarquette,
44j.eir;
pir :Pln, covering his service as director and officer of The
Iqvtional Bank and Trust Company of Marquette, Marquette,
"lCan, and of The Marquette County Savings Bank, Marquette,
achigan.
11In analyzing Lx. Kaufman's application, it was noted that,
1111 aI,n17er to question 12 on form 94, the applicant stated that,
a,/1c'uition to his services with the two banks covered by his
)
.lication, he is a director of General Motors Corporation,
exrit, 1,iehigan, Empire State, Incorporated, New York, N. Y.,
Chicago & Erie Railroad, Cleveland, Ohio. In answer to
11,7stion 13 on form 94, the applicant stated that the two banks
e 1"-ns on stock or bond collateral, and that 'So far as I
kn'
'none of the other organizations listed above makes loans
,,4
1 viclual s, associLtions, partnerships or corporations secur2
it
'Y stock or bond collateral.' In View of this statement,
thrlc not clear whether the services of the applicant with the
the
" Oil banking, organizations referred to above come within
11;ohibitions of Section 8A of the Clayton Act.
In this connection, reference is made to the Board's letter
tr 8 of November 10, 1933 (K-7677) and December 19, 1933 (X-7721
17hich it will be noted that if any non-banking organization
.
with
ich Mr. Kaufman is connected occasionally makes loans seuY stock or bond collateral, other than to its own subsidi-4
'his service at the save time as a director of such

4




7/31/34
_or
ganization and as a director, officer, or employee of a national bank is prohibited by Section SA, and the Board is without
authority
to issue a permit in such a case. Accordinly, it is
equested that,
before releasing the inclosed permit, you ascertain
definitely whether Ia.. Kaufman's services with any of the
1(311-banking organizations listed in his application come within
the
prohibitions of Section SA. If it is determined that none
Of the non-banking organizations makes loans on stock or bond
?ellateral within the contemplation of Section SA, you are authorized to
release the inclosed permit to :1*. Kaufman, at the
kme time forwarding copies thereof to the banks involved.
Please advise the Board of your disposition of this matter,
in order
that its records nay be complete."
Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
c)13-rd,
"r• Peyton, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve

Bank
°f Li
nneapolis, reading as follows:
'here are inclosed the Clayton Act permit and copies there.c
tr issu•ed by the
L. Rubin, Bismarck, Korth Dakota,
Board to
erve es director and officer of The First National Bank of
on, arid as director of The Dakota National Bank 6.; Trust Comr'"Y of Bismarck, both in Korth Dakota.
ItIn. the consideration of Lr. Rubin's application it was
I cted (item 12 - F.R.B. Form 94, dated December 13, 1933) that
Pe Ms serving as president of the First Kational
Investment Cornto1Y: Ashley, South Dakota, the business of which was described
e
'investments'.
thethe Board does not have detailed information regarding
character of
the business conducted by this company, it ape
oZrs Possible that the provisions of Section 32 of the Banking
ren cf 1933 aro applicable in this case. Therefore, the Board
t411.7cts that you make such investigation as is necessary to deof
ne the status of 14r. Rubin with respect to the provisions
'
L Getion
32.
11seoti_lfr you find to your satisfaction that the provisions of
to t un 62 are not applicable to Lr. Rubin, you are authorized
r4nsnit the Clayton Act permit to the applicant and copies
'
r0V to the banks concerned.
14411 If You find that Lr. Rubin's service with the above named
seci!; an(1. investment company COMBS within the provisions of
Of ,(311 32, you are requested to inform him of the requirements
tionit section and as to the procedure in making formal applioafac "
- pr a Section 32 permit. If upon consideration of all the
t_ 's involved, with the advice of your counsel, you are unable
u determine to your satisfaction the applicability of Section

l




2352
7/31/34

-39-

la this case, the Board, upon receipt of full information,
yill be glad to
rule upon the matter. In any event, the delivery
°f the Clayton Act permit should not be made until it has been
determined that Er. Rubin's service with the above named company
t
alascl haniz does not come within the provisions of Section 32 or
r-4t his service with such institutions has been brought into conwith the requirements of that section.
Please inform the Board of the action taken in this matter."
Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
13°ard s to lir.
13kalk

McClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve

of Kansas City,
reading as follows:
04, ."There are inclosed the Clayton Act permit, and copies thereIssued by the Board to Walter J. Aycock, El Reno, Oklahoma,
lng his
services at The Citizens National Bank of El Reno,
,?er4Re
f_orno, Oklahoma, and the Piedmont State Bank, Piedmont, Oklan m.
✓
"In analyzing Mr. Aycock's application it was noted that the
.eport
of examination of The Citizens National Bank of El Reno
April 14, 1934 contained a statement of condition of the
ns Finance and Investment Company, El Reno, Oklahoma, as
rah
✓22 PRA 31, 1934 showing loans and discounts amounting to
'-.J= out of total assets of $23,316. Er. Aycock was listed
•
'vice president and a director of the company. The report
did not
se
indicate if the loans and discounts included any loans
Laegred by stock or bond collateral. The application, dated
'1934, stated that the applicant was not a director, offiY 18
Renos or employee of any firm or corporation other than the El
__
and Piedmont banks. Before releasing Mr. Aycock's permit,
requested to satisfy yourself that he has severed his
co4t.licial connection with the Citizens Finance and Investment
O' 1133anY, provided that this company makes loans secured by stock
Of 211d collateral. Please advise the Board of your disposition
matter in order that its records may be complete.
According to the same report of examination, Er. C. A. Vose
4 a director
of the Citizens Finance and Investment Company.
uj
erinit was issued to Er. Vose on November 9, 1931 by the Board
i,:(er authority of Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act coverhis services at the First National Bank and Trust Company
.11
mc) °Iclahota City, Oklahoma, The Citizens National Bank of El
4eno.
010.4 0klah
°ma, and the American National Bank of Fort Towson,
8.13111.°ln
" Unless it is determined in connection with Er. Aycock's
1101 ication
that the Citizens Finance and Investment Company does
114ke loans secured by stock or bond collateral, please ascer4 inform the Board if Er. Vose has severed his official
3a"

.4




2353

v31/34

-40-

Uc
onnection with this company."
'Is Clayton Act
permit referred to authorized Lr. Aycock to serve at
the 86tMe tine

as a director and officer of The Citizens 'I'ational Bank

Of El Reno, El Reno, Oklahoma, and as a director of the riedmont
81L-te Bank,
piedmont, Oklahoma.
Approved.
Letter dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
Bo
ard, to
.
LcClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
Baalk of
Aansas City, reading as follows:
"There are inclosed the Clayton Act permit; and copies there3Of issued
by the Board to L. E. C. Love, Chandler, Oklahoma,
verinE his
service as director and officer of The First 1:ational
Of Chandler,
Chandler, Oklahoma, and director of The First
'
-d"nal Bank of Stroud, Stroud, Oklahoma, for trprsmittal by
You
files. 1,:r. Love and the two banks, together with a copy for your

r

to th In approving this application, consideration has been given
the af satement of the applicant that he has kept in touch with
off. fall's of the Stroud bank through contacts with the active
po leers and by careful inspection of the bank's examination reIt has been noted, however, that he has attended only 6
i'reetorel meetings
of a total of 33 held by the Stroud bank dur1Z the Past two years. The Board feels that a director should
sj?
satisfactory record of discharging the duties and respon0 ullities of his
office by participating in the management and
irat10/11; of the bank through attendance at directors' meetings.
ci;
11 transnitting to La.. Love his copy of this permit, it is deViheleid that you inform him of the Board's views in this matter.
rev-4-2roll submit your recommendations as a result of your annual
ao --4.-w of this
permit, the Board requests that you report fully
1934."
Love's attendance at directors' meetings during
Approved.
Lotter dated July 27, 1034,
approved by three members of the
13(3krd, to Lir.
LeClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
Betro,
Of

4

"sas City, reading as follows:
"hore are
inclosed copies of the Clayton Act permit issued




2354

v31/34

-41ft,
LIY• the Board to La-. F. G. Whipple to serve The First 1,ational
of Lawrence, iansas, and The First Savings Bank, Laurence,
Kansas.
"Confidentially, information obtained from the files of the
Comptroller of the
Currency indicates that 1,1r. F. C. Whipple
aPparently has committed a number of violations of Section 22()
of the
Federal Reserve Act by overdrawing his account in The First
l'atienal Bank of Lawrence, and that the alleged violations were
reported to the
Attorney General of the United States.
.Che Board feels that, in all cases where there have been
!iolations of the law, even though of a technical nature and not
flrivolving large amounts, definite information should be obtained
,n11 the proper authorities regarding the disposition which was
of such cases before permits under the provisions of the
Act are issued. You are requested, therefore, to ascertain the
status of charges against Li-. F. C. -Clippie, and in the
svent
the cases have been duly considered and closed without pro4?euti0n, you are authorized to release the inclosed permit to
applic
x_c,t_n and to foruard copies thereof to the banks involved,
aa
u time furnishing the Board complete information with
rle;
,,
:oard to the disposition of these matters in order that its
'tleord$15, may
be complete.
„„
4hen you submit your recommendations, as a result of your
aal review
of this permit, the Board requests that you report
pr41Y as to whether La-. F. C. Vihipple has further violated any
°visions of the law by overdrawing his account or otherwise."

iV

the

Clayton Act
permit referred to authorized hr. Mipple to serve at

the

time as a director and officer of The First National Bank of

La471'exice,

Lav.Tenee, Hansas, and as a director and officer of The First

8"ings Bank,
Lawrence, Kansas.
Approved.
Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
n
v r
3

t0

Lank at lc

1.

1,cClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve

41344s City, reading as follows:
i ihere are inclosed the Clayton Act permit and copies thereOf
Iled by the Board to hr. J. R. Breed, 7436 Broadway, Kansas
0. "
•
The IT . ..4ouri,
covering his services as director and officer of
pir,4!liversity Lank, Kansas City, Elissouri, and as director of ihe
You 0ilational Bank of hydro, Hydro, Oklahoma, for transmittal by
1,r. Breed and the two tanks, together with a copy for your




v31/34
'In approvinr; this application,
consideration has been given
to.the
statement of The First i:ational Bank of hydro that the apPlleant spends several days at the bank two or three times a year
(1.. which times the bank's
policies and conditions are discussed
Ylth the officers, and also to your statement that the applicant
well and favorably known in hydro
where he formerly lived. It
!
18 been noted, however, that the applicant has not attended any
directors,1_
meetings of the liydro bank during the past two years.
"e Board feels
that a director should have a satisfactory record
Of d
ischarging the duties and responsibilities of his office by
P,
cfticiPating in the management and operations of the bank
through
at directors' meetings and it is with the expectation
that
-cllat the
applicant will improve his attendance that the Board has
alted the permit.
';then transmitting to Lr. Breed his copy of
Pc3rmit, it is desired that you inform him of the Board's
L'el713 in this natter. Iihen you submit your recommendations, as a
th tt of your annual review of this permit, the Board requests
at You
report fully as to L. Breed's attendance at directors'
211°°t1n-gs during 1934."

T

Approved.
Letter dated July 30, 1934, aDproved
by two members of the
B°41'd, to :
LcClure, Federal Reserve 11,;ent at the Federal Reserve
BEtrik
,
°f 4an5a5
City, reading as follows:
"There are inclosed the
original and copies of the Clayton
Permit issued to 14-. Charles F. Coffee
covering, his services
cOrector and officer of The First Rational Bank of Chadron,
-Ofl3
Nebraska, The Sioux National Bank of harrison, Harrison,
!ebraska, and The First National Bank of Hay Springs, Hay
Springs,
-ebrEtaka.
ACt

1-

is noted from 1,,r. Coffee's application that, in addition
o 11
t4,
di,
service on the above named banks, he is also serving as
all'aeotor of
the First National Bnnk of Gordon, Gordon, i;ebraska,
tio that he stated that he
intended to resign from such institu-

then:, however, the records of the
Board and the Comptroller of

fro ulnIrrneY do not indicate that hr. Coffee has as yet resigned
:
411 1 -110 bank and in view of the fact that the Board is without
_
tt, issue a permit covering more than three banking inYOU are requested to withhold delivery of the inclosed
4,4con Act
permit to Er. Coffee until you are satisfied that he
of rilletually
severed his connection with the First National Bank
to ./Ornl,d
,
In which event you are authorized to deliver the permit
the e a pplicant, at the same time transmitting copies thereof to
LInks
involved.
Please advise the Board of your action in this matter."




Approved.

2356
7/31/34..

--43Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
uo

McClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve

Bank

of Xansas City, reading as follows:
"There are inclosed copies of the Clayton Act permit issued
Robert S. Gast, Thatcher Building, Pueblo, Colorado, covering his service as director and officer of The First National
Dank of Florence, Colorado, and director of The American National
!
,n1c of Alamosa, Colorado, for transmittal by you to Lr. Gast and
46 tr banks, together uith a copy for your files.
In approving this application, consideration has been given
to
Your statement that the applicant is familiar with the affairs
of the banks
through frequent contacts with their officers and a
!bstantial stockholder although it has been noted that he has
attended
only 4 of the 28 directors' meetings held during the past
-cwo
rears at Florence and 3 of the 26 meetings held during that
period
a
at Alamosa. The Board feels that a director should have a
f
record of discharging the duties and responsibilities
of
or .
11-8 office by participating in the management and operations
bank through attendance at directors meetings. Uhen trans'tang to Lx'. Gast his copy of this permit, it is desired that
!?!-I inform him of the Board's views in this natter. lilhen you subYour recommendations, as a result of your annual review of
t,
of18Pert,
the Board requests that you report fully as to Er.
" a attendance at directors' meetings during 1934."

t
V

Approved.
Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
Board, to
Lr. McClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve
Ba* of
4ansas City, reading as follows:
It
There are inclosed Clayton Act permit and copies thereof
iSSI14,1
by the Board to Mr. E. A. Hanes, to serve as director and
np,
(
-1;-Lioer of The First National Bank of Ottawa, Ottawa, Kansas and
difiector
of the Lane State Bank, Lane, Kansaspir 4_ Information obtained from the examination report of The
1934, indicates
that National Bank of Ottawa as at January 24,
li.2 ?'r e E. A. Hanes has probably violated Section 5208 of the
by certifying a check when the drawer did not have sufeIent funds on deposit to cover, and that the alleged violation
was r
ported to the Attorney General of the United States.
-701,4 Ihe Board feels that, in connection with applications inreported violations of the law, definite information
-114d be obtained regarding the disposition which was made of




2357
7/31/34

-44-

O

such eases before permits under the provisions of the Clayton
Act are
issued. You are requested, therefore, to ascertain the
status of the charges against 1,1r. E. A. Hanes, if any, and in
the event the
case has been duly considered and closed without
Prosecution, you are authorized to release the inclosed permit
to Lr,
B. A. Hanes and to forward copies thereof to the banks
involved,
at the same time furnishing the Board complete inferion with respect to the disposition of this matter, in order
that its
records may be complete. The Board also desires that,
'
clEca you submit your recommendation as a result of your annual
review of this permit, you report fully as to whether Ur. Hanes
'las further
violated any provisions of the law."

T

Approved.
Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the
Bo d
-3

to lir. McClure, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve

13Walcof
to the

Kansas City, stating that the Board has given consideration

following application for a permit under the Clayton Act, and

uPen. the basis of
the infarmation before it, feels that the isstlance of
the Permit applied for would be incompatible with the public
"
c
The letter also requested the agent to communicate to the
4P14earit the
Board's position in the matter, and to advise the Board
Proztptly as
to whether the applicant desires to submit any additional
°Etta.
'11114, if not, as to it steps he proposes to take in order to
ceralay
with the
provisions of the Clayton Act.
/
f' P. G. Wulf, for permission to serve at the same time as
director and officer of the Humboldt National Bank, Humboldt,
p;Tsas, and as a director and officer of The State Bank of Garden
41 in, Garden
Plain, Kansas.
Approvod, together with the following letter
to be
transmitted to Lr. O'Connor, Comptroller of
,he Currency, if and when advice is received from
!
4
'
'McClure, that hr. Milf has severed his connection with the State Bank of Garden Plain, Kansas:

p

"The Board has recently had under consideration the Clayton




2358
7
/31/34

-45Act

application of jr. U. F. G. Wulf, Humboldt, Kansas, for persame time as director and officer of the
National Bank, Humboldt, Kansas, and as director and officer of the
State Bank of Garden Plain, Garden Plain, Kansas, and
Upon
the basis of the information before it, did not grant the
.1!PPlication.
The Board has been advised that Er. Wulf has severed
"ls connection with the State Bank of
Garden Plain. The Board's
ieltion upon this application was based largely upon the nature of
tl,.! use which the applicant has made of the credit facilities of
t',1 Humboldt
National Bank and the criticisms of operating prac.
1ces and policies of such bank as shown in the current report of
r'x.darlination. In this connection, there is inclosed for your conBlontial
a copy of a memorandum prepared in the
-rus Division of Examinations covering this case.
"The Board's action on this case is called to your attention
yj
elY for your information in connection with any consideration
st i Your office might give to whether proceedings should be in1,,?;6uted under the
provisions of Section 30 of the Banking Act of
03, with
respect to Er. Wulf."

V-385-on to serve at the
,111.11boldt

Z

Letters dated July 26, 1934, approved by
members of the
ii°41'cl, to
aPPlicants for permits under the Clayton Act, advising of apPrOval

Of their applications as follows:
kr. Gan

u

Buclman, for permission to serve at the same time as
4Arector of The Commercial National Bank of Charles City, Charles
13.,Y1 I°Iva, and as a director of the Commercial Trust and Savings
Charles City, Iowa.
c.
x. Dinkel, for permission to serve at the same time as a dir
Of The Commercial National Bank of Charles City, Charles
401.1 Iowa, and as a director of the Commercial Trust and Savings
Charles City, Iowa.
4. ,
1' Hauser, for permission to serve at the same time
as z.4.:
7
rector
ch vr and officer of The Commercial
National Bank of Charles
T4:41
," CitY, IOVJR, and as a director and officer of the Colamercial
and Savings Bank, Charles City, Iona.
kr. j
lie .
oht, for permission to serve at the same time as a director
cha 8:ad officer
of The Commercial Eational Bank of Charles City,
Tru:!
"City, Iowa, and as a director and officer of the Commercial
-' and Savings Bank, Charles City, lova.
Gen
If. Johnson, for permission to serve at the sane time as a
Citir-'.°1* of The Commercial National Bank of Charles City, Charles
"
'
0wa, and as a director of the Commercial Trust and Savings
s Charlea City,
Iowa.




2359
7/31/34
-4614r. Carl
C. Magdsick, for permission to serve at the same time as
a.
director and officer of The Commercial National Bank of Charles
',„'itY$ Charles City,
Iowa, and as a director and officer of the
vommercial Trust and Savings Bank, Charles City, Iowa.
Ralph P. Waller, for permission to serve at the same time as a
of The Commercial National Bank of Charles City, Charles
ect°r
Y,
Iowa, and as a director of the Commercial Trust and Savings
'Dank, Charles
City, Iowa.

t

Approved, together with a letter, also dated
July 26, 1934, and approved by three members of the
Board, to Mr. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, reading as follows:
°There are
inclosed for your files copies of the Clayton Act
rrilite issued by the Board to Messrs. Carl C. Magdsick, A. M.
atIaleT., J. Hecht, C. F. Dinkel, Geo. H. Buckman, Ralph P. Waller
06.'0" W. Johnson covering their services as directors and/or
of The Commercial National Bank of Charles City and Corntlerleers
rust and Savings Bank, both of Charles City, Iowa.
In
re2ort ofconsidering these applications, it was noted that the
examination of the national bark as of June 4, 1934,
Pd loans to Messrs. Magdsick,
Hauser, Buckman, and hecht
terr their
interests as subject to criticism. It was further
be Id that the
national bank examiner reported the management to
ng in aggressiveness and initiative and suggested that,
w of the substantial increase in slow paper and the failure
!Past to perform on promises made for correction, monthly
reiri,
appa-4's be required over the signatures of the directors. It also
theTns,,,that the above named directors have been associated with
roof
for many years, that the banks operate under the same
illeti Zau for all practical purposes apparently are regarded as one
feet- ution$
and that the management has expressed a desire to efTeonsolidation of the two banks.
be t'
11 view of these circumstances, the Board felt that it would
der;
'
Itsferable to grant these permits in order to avoid any misun14ding by the community- which might prove detrimental to the
beet!
J.nterests
of the banks, but it suggests that in cooperation
1
Z
the D
istrict Chief National Bank Examiner, you endeavor to
the
ab°ut a correction of those matters -which were the cause of
;Iiner's criticisms.
2111al 1,:r1 You submit your recommendation as a result of your anas to:
1 617 of these permits, you are requested to report fully
liallser -"e current status of the borrowings of Messrs. Magdsick,
t Buckmn, and Hecht and as to the action, if any, which has
been. '
81°311 to strengthen the management of the national bank."

Z

Zn

r

Lettr
8 8




dated July 26, 1934, approved by three members of the

2360
/
1
21/34

-47-

Board, to

aPplicants for permits under the Clayton Act, advising of

4PProval of their
applications as follows:
lir. L. L.
Trussell, for permission to serve at the same time as
T. director
of The First National Bank of Fordyce, Fordyce,
..srkansas, and as a director and officer of the Fordyce Bank &
Trust
Company, Fordyce, Arkansas.
Julius A. Coller, for permission to serve at the same time
;Lacoltector and officer of The First National Bank of Shakopee,
$ Minnesota, and as a director and officer of the First
Utate Bank,
hew Market, Minnesota.
11?'. J. H.
Moore, for permission to serve at the same time as a
director and officer of The First National Bank of Shakopee,
akoPee
Market,lannesota, and as a director of the First State Bank,
iw' hinnesota.

Pe

'Cs Theo. Weiland, for permission to serve at the same time
s
Et18
, a director
and officer of The First National Bank of Shakopee,
ceakopee2
Minnesota, and as a director of the First State Bank,
wLiarket, Minnesota.
Approved.
Board,

Letters dated July 27, 1934, approved by two members of the
t° aPPlicants for permits under the Clayton Act, advising of

v'l of their
applications as follows:
A
Austln L. Adams, for permission to serve at the same time as
adodireo+-or
and officer of The Naugatuck National Bank, Naugatuck,
cr,n4eoticut, and as a director and officer of The Colonial Trust
.111Pany,
Waterbury, Connecticut.
Mr.
• "lfred
red E. Chase, for permission to serve at the same time as
lias_.,4.1cer of The Merchants National Bank of Boston, Boston,
Lynrohusetts, and as a director of The Central National
Bank of
LYnn, Massachusetts.
F. Davis, for permission to serve at the same time as
a. dire
reotor of the Hartford Savings Bank & Trust Company, libite
Ba! Junction, Vermont, as a director of the Claremont National
Claremont, New
Hampshire, and as a director of The Windham
1al
Nat.1°2
Bank of Bellows Falls, Bellows Falls, Vermont.
lir. j
allies F. Dewey, for permission to serve at the same time as




2361
7/31/34
-48a director of
The Wbodstock National Bank, Woodstock, Vermont,
;Itzsc
=
r:tor and officer of the Hartford Savings Bank &
White River Junction, Vermont.
lir. Benjamin Apple, for permission to serve at the same time as
a director
of The First National Bank of Sunbury, Sunbury, Pennlvazia, and as a director and officer of the Freeburg State
"641k, Freeburg, Pennsylvania.

Ijf.

Lewis, for permission to serve at the same time as a
rector of The First
National Bank of Asheboro, Asheboro, North
B
!
9.1.°1ina, and as a director and officer of the Bank of Biscoe,
lscoe, North Carolina,
VI.
* D. Cook, for permission to serve at the Bare time as a
t.a.rector and officer of the First National Bank in Meridian,
Li!ridiAns Mississippi, and as a director and officer of the Bank
vl
Lorton, Lorton, Mississippi.
Lum Anderson, for permission to serve at the same time as a
irector and officer of The First National Bank in Green Forest,
!
/3 een Forest, Arkansas, and as a director of The First National
4/* at
Berryville, Berryville, Arkansas.
,
"Beerse, for permission to serve at the same time as a
(.4*iila-cector aad officer of The First National Bank of
Hastings,
13„!ings, Minnesota, and as a director of the Vermillion State
Q-Lia, V
ermillion, Linnesota.
E
r
dvardS.
co, for permission to serve at the same time as
4 director and
officer
of The First National Bank and Trust ComPany of
Larquette, Marquette, Michigan, and as a director of The
rquet
-ci-te
County Savings Bank, Marquette, Michigan.
uharles L.
Brainerd, for permission to serve at the same time
ma. director and officer.of The First National Bank and Trust
Th;ltb_LY of Marquette, Marquette, Michigan, and as a director of
4uurquette County Savings Bank, Marquet-6, Michigan.

g

%

Ed ra.
a djr'd J. Hudson, for permission to serve at the same time as
poz
;
e"or and officer of The First National Bank and Trust CoinMarquette, Marquette, Michigan, and as a director and ofricer
'
of The Marquette County Savings Bank, Marquette, Michigan.
,
j
recto'hn1i11,
for permission to serve at the same time as a diriso r and officer of tho First National Bank in Garrison, Garof „114 North Dakota, and as a director of The First National Bank
Niarson, Carson, North Dakota.
Ur. c.
L. Frick , for permission to serve at the same time as a




2362

v31/34

-49-

rector and officer of The Farmers National Bank
of Oberlin,
0
erlin, Kansas, and as a director and officer of the
Dresden
State B...Luc, Dresden, Kansas.
Approved.
Letters dated July 27, 1934, approved by three members
of the
hoard, t,
aPplicants for permits under the Clayton Act, advisinc of
4Pr°1ra1 of their
applications as follows:
Lir
Doak Finch, for permission to
serve at the same time as a director of The
First National Bank of Thomasville, Thomasville,
13°1-bh Carolina,
and as a director and officer of the Carolina
,ond Trust
Company, Denton, North Carolina.
Lr. "
G rge D. Finch, for permission to serve at the same time as
director of The First National Bank of Thomasville,
Thomasville,
Orth C
arolina, and as a director of the Carolina Bank and Trust
on1Pany., Denton,
North Carolina.
'I. Garner, for permission to serve at
the same time as an
cer of The
First
National
Bank
of
Thomasville,
Thomasville,
borth C
arolina, and as a director and officer of the Carolina
allk and
Trust Company, Denton, North Carolina.
c
as * harles F.
Phillips, for permission to serve at the same time
vi4 director of The First National
Bank of Thomasville, ThomasLorth Carolina, and as a director and officer of
the
no. Bank and Trust Company,
Denton, North Carolina.
,
2
"Pope, for permission to serve at the same time as an
°f
0-;icer
of The First National
Bank of Thomasville, Thomasville,
Con,
h Carolina, and as a director of the Carolina Bank and Trust
C0pany
Denton, North Carolina.

ri

'11a1ter
-qapp, for permission to serve at the same time as
4
- 04Vieer of The
First National Bank of Thomasville, Thomasville,
COra 4' Car olina,
and as a director of the Carolina Bank and Trust
Paay, Denton,
North Carolina.
Lir. B.
recto," 4they, for permission to serve at the same time as a diand officer of the Security Bank al: Trust Company,
Enid,
of 4 °Ma, and as a director and officer of The First
National Bank
erine3seY, hennessey, Oklahoma.
G. 1,
direct [
i * Athey, for permission to serve at the same time as
or and officer of the Security Bank & Trust Company, /mid,




2363

7/31/34

-50-

Oklahoma,
and as a director and officer of The First National
Balik of Hennessey, Hennessey, Oklahoma.
14 R. G. Athey, for permission
"
to serve at the same time as a
director
and officer of the Security Bank & Trust Company, Enid,
Idahoma: and as a
director and officer of The First National
14011c of Hennessey,
Hennessey, Oklahoma.

?

14 14 AA Basgall, for permission to serve
"
at the same time as
;itTor and officer of The Farmers National Bank
of Victoria,
a: Kansas, and as a director of The First National Bank
Of Hays
City, Hays, Kansas.
Mr. j A
A•
iclireotor lermis, for permission to serve at the same time as a
and officer of The First National Bank of Hays City, Hays,
_!118Rs: and as a director and officer of The
Farmers National Bank
v4
Victoria, Victoria, Kansas.
j0A. Lermis,
for permission to serve at the same time as
lac d
irector of The Farmers National Bank of Victoria,
Victoria,
risas, and as a
director of The First National Bank of Hays
ltr
'}lays: Kansas.

j

1:Ir. George
Docking, for permission to serve at the same time as
Ladirect°r and officer of The First National Bank of Laurence,
inl
:
renees Kansas, and as a director and officer of The First Say'' Lawrence, Kansas.
a ,,'1.A.liam Docking, for permission to serve at the same time as
43'J-rector and
officer of The First National Bank of Laurence,
LaZence, Kansas, and as a director of The First Savings Bank,
-4ence,
Kansas.
n V. Hoover, for permission to serve at the
same time as
'Airector of The First National Bank of Laurence,
Laurence,
4rctirass as a director of The
First Savings Bank, Lawrence, Kansas,
4,
a8 a director and officer of The Kaw Valley State Bank,
„sas.
Eudora,
0.

Mr. ,
dire
• Stewart, for permission to serve at the same tireas a
direct
Qs
of The First National Bank of Lawrence, Laurence, Kansas,
4
d
irector of The First Savings Bank, Lawrence, Kansas, and as
%klrector of The Kaw Valley State Bank, Eudora, Kansas.
Th
4'
3111as Beaslin, for permission to serve at the same time as
11.13;ector and officer of the Ford City State
Bank, Ford City,
and as a director and officer of The Citizens National
°f King City, King City, Eissouri.

4

ji




Cashman, for permission to serve at the same time as a

2364
7/31/34
-51director and officer of the First State Bank, Tishomingo, Oklaas a director and officer of The Bank of Commerce, WetuMka,
unklahama, and as an employee of the National Bank of Tulsa, Tulsa,

Approved.
Letters dated July 28, 1934, approved by two members of the
'Ll7d" to applicants for Permits under the Clayton Act, advising of
aPProval
Of their
applications as follows:
T4r.
-• J. Head, for permission to serve at the same time as a
,..I.rector and officer of The First National Bank of Dalton, Dalton,
,
"rgia, and as a director P.m officer of The Bank of Dalton,
ualton, Georgia.

r

d. "
Martin, for permission to serve at the same time as a
lreotor of The First National Bank of Dalton, Dalton, Georgia,
and as a director of The Bank of Dalton, Dalton, Georgia.
!Sr. Charles
Henderson, for permission to serve at the same time
a director of
the First Farmers and Merchants National Bank
T_ l'roY, Troy, Alabama, and as a director and officer of the
'
0Y Bank and Trust Company, Troy, Alabama.
Approved.
13Oard

Letters dated July 30, 1934, approved by two members of the

'to
Etppr0

applicants for permits under the Clayton Act, advising of

741 of their applications as follows:
di
-kay F. Lynch, for permission to serve at the sane time as a
l'?otor of the First National Bank in
Latrobe, Latrobe, Pennsyl"
1 , and as a director of the First National Bank of Scottdale,
ceLtdale, Pennsylvania.

r

111*. L. T:
dir_
Noland, for permission to serve at the same time as a
lie:toter of The
First National Bank of Newport News, Newport
'Virginia, and as a director and officer of the Citizens
-414111e Jefferson Bank, Newport News, Virginia.
dire "ad A. Cox, for permission to serve at the same time as a
cit otor of
The Hamilton hational Bank of Johnson City, Johnson
To„ Y1 Tennessee, and as a director and officer of the Farmers &
v
—rchants
Bank, Limestone, Tennessee.




2365

V31/34

-52-

Ij**"Ks Hunter, for permission to serve at the sane time as a
director and officer of The Liberty National Bank a:
Trust Company
tt:r1111, Savannah, Georgia, and as a director of The First
ank & Trust Compsmy in Macon, Macon, Georgia.

Z

Stanley A. Clark, for permission to serve at the same time as
,E! director
and officer of The City National Bank of South Bend,
02Uth Bend,
0-cate Bank, Indiana, and as a director and officer of the Galien
Galien, Michigan.
lir. Perry
Davis, for permission to serve at the same time as a
director and officer of The Lafayette National
Bank, Lafayette,
,1clisza, and as a director and officer of the Stockwell State Bank,
tOck11,
Indiana.
14r. -a
TT_
rry Jennings, for permission to serve at the
same time as a
director of The First National Bank of
.1.0wa
Centerville, Centerville,
,
4,,J and as a director of the Iowa Trust & Savings
Bank, Center'4

-"e, Iowa
,

R. Calverley, for permission to serve at the same time as
kAlrector and officer of The Kirk State Bank, Kirk,
Colorado,
-334 as a director and officer'of The First National Bank of Straton, S
tratton, Colorado.

Z

CharIs P. Coffee, Jr., for permission to serve at the same
;
411e as a
director and officer of The First National Bank of Chadn,
Chadron, Nebraska, and as a director of The Sioux National
ank of H
arrison, Harrison, Nebraska.
E
•
A; cil
'
Ain D. Crites, for permission to serve at the sane time as
rector of The First National Bank of Chadron,
Chadron,
and as a director of The Sioux National Bank of Harrison,
-4.ricon, Nebraska.

e

%

aa '
llaanin P. Pitman, for permission to serve at the same time
1,,, 44
director of The First National Bank of Chadron, Chadron,
4
,r
iaska, and as a director of The First National
Bank of Hay
llgs, Hay
Springs, Nebraska.
a di,
Birningham, for permission to serve at the same time as
?e-cor and officer of The First National Bank of
O'Neill,
Ba1;141, Nebraska,
as a director and officer of The First National
Of ;,(3f Atkinson, Atkinson, Nebraska, and as a director and officer
"e Emmet State
Bank, Emmet, Nebraska.

ka aE4nard M.
Gallagher, for permission to serve at the sare time
0111
B

.kurector and officer of The First National Bank of
e111, N
ebraska, as a director and officer of The First National
c)f Atkinson, Atkinson, Nebraska,
and as a director and officer




2366

/
1
21/34
the Emmet State Bank, Emmet, Nebraska.
. Geo. E.
Gano, for permission to serve at the sane time as a
idirector of The First National Bank of Hutchinson, Hutchinson,
Tansae, and as a director and officer of The Fontron Loan and
rust Company, Hutchinson, Kansas.
'J
"B. Sawyer, for permission to serve at the same time as a
;ILIrector of The First National Bank of Hutchinson, Hutchinson,
:
44as, and as a director and officer of The State Bank of
—"lien, Haven, Kansas.
Lr. D
• G. Hansen, for permission to serve at the same time as a
director and officer of The First National Bank of Logan, Logan,
,
ansas, and as a director and officer of The Farmers State Bank,
'4Peed, Kansas.
14r..
eltrIViltrout, for permission to serve at the sane time as
director and
officer of The First National Bank of Logan, Logan,
,,,,11042, and as a director and officer of The First National Bank
"Prairie
View, Prairie View, Kansas.
j

ohn A. Reed, for permission to serve at the
same time as a
i irector
l
and officer of The First National Bank of Kemmerer,
Bnfer,
as a director of the State Bank of Big Piney,
R
*J1leY, Wyoming, and as a director of the State Bank of Pinerinedale, Wyoming.
14r. II „
44Ter P. Napier, for permission to serve at the save time
ta director and officer of The Alamo National
Bank of San
br °1110, San Antonio, Texas, and as a director of the San Antonio
anch of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, San Antonio, Texas.

4%

Approved.
Board,

Letter dated July 30, 1934, approved by three members of the

an applicant for a permit under the Clayton Act, advising
4Proval
-- of his application as follows:
A4 '
418
'Swenson,

for permission to serve at the same time as
rector of The First National Bank of Braham, Braham, Linne:
144;:' as a director and officer of the State

Bank of Lora, Mora,
0,..T
'
l es'eta, and as a director and officer of the First State Bank,
lannesota.
Approved.
Th
ere were then presented the followins applications for




7/31/34
clulAges in
stock of Federal reserve
AP
lications for ORIGINAL Stock:
kstrict No. 3.
tley uxtional Bank of Beord,
df
Bedford,
Tlhe
Pennsylvania
First National
Bank in Bedford,
Bedford, Pennsylvania
411.11

No. 6.
Georgia

District No. 7.
The
Clintonville National Bank,
TheClintonville, IVisconsin
Pontiac National
Bank,
Pontiac, Illinois
District No, 9
iational Bank in Pierre,
Pierre, South
Dakota

Pirst

District No,
11.
Pirst
National Bank in Athens,
Athens, Texas




72
Total
Approved.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Executive Committee.

72
----- 435