View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for

To:

July 13, 1960

Members of the Board

From: Office of the Secretary

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
Vith respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question vIth regard to
the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will advise
the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, please initial below.
If You were present at the meeting, your initials will
indicate approval of the minutes. If you were not present,
Your initials will indicate only that you have seen the
minutes.




Chin. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
Gov, Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. King

Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
Wednesday, July 13, 1960.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

The Board met in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Mills
Robertson
Shepardson
Mr. Sherman, Secretary
Mr. Hackley, General Counsel
Mr. Nelson, Assistant Director, Division
of Examinations
Mr. Goodman, Assistant Director, Division of
Examinations
Mrs. Semia, Technical Assistant, Office of the
Secretary
Mr. Hooff, Assistant Counsel

Items circulated to the Board.

The following items, which had

been circulated to the Board and copies of which are attached to these
141111-1tes under the respective item numbers indicated, were approved

Item No.
ItZer to the Valley Bank and Trust Company, Springto
Massachusetts, approving an extension of time
establish a branch at 82 North Elm Street, Westfield.

1

Let

p er to The Chase Manhattan Bank, New York City,
Etp!
37;
°ving the continued operation of its branches at

19E

2

al Street and 43 Exchange Place until December 31,
ter

vi•Apro—,to the Nassau Trust Company, Glen Cove) New York,
:
Averl .ng the establishment of a branch at 97 Forest

3

Letter to
the Bankers Trust Company, New York City,Park
'
l
°ving
the
establishment of a branch at 280-290
e.entle

4




7/13/60

-2Item No.

Letter to the First Bank and Trust Company of South
Bead, South Bend, Indiana, approving the establishment
of a branch in Roseland.

5

Letter to the Commercial State Savings Bank, Greenville,
chigan, approving the establishment of a branch at
best Second Street, Trufant.

6

1.etter to the County Bank of Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz,
.;alifornia, approving the establishment of a branch in
Aptos.

7

,etter to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regardthe application of Home Bank, Compton, California,
r continuation of deposit insurance after withdrawal
°D1 membership in the Federal Reserve System.

8

L:tter to Bank of America, New York City, transmitting
TeP'rts of examination of its Guatemala Branch and
c;.Et Torre Agency, both in Guatemala City, Guatemala, as
f the close of business April 23, 1960.

9

Proposed national bank at McLean
to

Virginia.

A draft of letter

the Comptroller of the Currency had been circulated in regard to an

el)lication to organize a national bank at McLean, Virginia.

The

15r0Posed letter recommended disapproval of the application on the ground
ths.4
here did not appear to be sufficient need for a new bank, in view
°t the fact that two branches of other banks were providing banking
"
Iqces for the immediate area.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

recommended disapproval of the application on the same ground.
Governor Robertson expressed disagreement with the recommendatiomi

for disapproval.

He stated that every factor was favorable, and

he t
hought it was inconsistent to say that there was no need for the




7/13/60

-3-

ProPosed institution and at the same time to say, as did the
report
04 the
application, that the bank could operate profitably.

The

intended management of the proposed bank was good and he did
not
believe that the Board would be
justified in turning down the organWho were willing to risk their investment.
Governor Mills said that he agreed with the view expressed by
Governor Robertson.

He observed that the Board had sometimes dis-

proved branch applications that it considered
premature in order
t° avoid having
a branch pre-et a good location.

In the present

case he thought the Board
would not be justified in recommending dis%31'ov5.1 of an
application by a group of responsible people who were
14111ing
to risk their investments on the prospect that a growing area

'4'ula

continue to grow and would
comfortably support the proposed

inst
itution.
Mr. Nelson stated that the Vienna Trust Company had a branch
14 McLean and the Fairfax County National Bank was in the
process of
°Petilng one.

It was believed that those two offices could handle the

cckiaable business,
in addition to which there were offices of three
other b
anks within four miles of McLean.
In spite of the fact that
va,
.Q estimated that
the proposed bank could obtain 4 million in
P°sit8
within three years, he felt that there was a lack of need
tor ,
because the present offices could take care of the
community.
Governor Robertson reviewed various information that had come
41k that
indicated that substantial expansion could be expected




• '4+,0

7/13/60

-4-

in the McLean area during the next few years, especially because of
the coming
occupation of the Central Intelligence Agency's headnow under construction and the opening of the new airport
at nearby Chantilly.

He thought there was no basis for denying the

°PPortunity to the investors who believed that the expected expansion
Presented a good prospect for a bank, especially since approval of
thei, application would not hurt any other bank.
Mr. Nelson agreed that considerable growth was expected in
the McLean
area and that in the future there would be room for another
bank, but he thought that as of now there was not a real need.

As a

1111Itter of fact, he thought that the opening of the new branch of the
?aill'ax County National Bank would cause a slightly over-banked condition in the immediate future.

He pointed out that many of the people

ho live in the McLean area work in Washington and have banking connections there.
Mr. Hooff noted that the proposed letter to the Comptroller of
the a

urrency would recommend that the application be denied on the

.4)It'°1111ds that there was not sufficient need for another bank at this
time
• He stated that, from the legal standpoint, a "lack of need"
t(Ix' a' bank did not constitute a satisfactory basis for denial of an
el°Plication when all other factors were favorable.
Governor Shepardson said that, with great expansion expected
14 the t
erritory, he did not see why the organizers who saw an




Oil
26
7/13/60

-5-

°PPortunity in that growth should be denied
a chance to take advantage
°f the situati
on under the circumstances that appeared to exist.
Governor Balderston stated his belief that an important point
that if the proposed bank were established, a wider choice
of banking
facilities would be available.
It was understood that, in accordance with customary practice,
the Federal Reserve Bank
of Richmond would be notified that the Board
ves considering recommending
approval of the application, so that the
Reserve Bank
might have an opportunity to submit such further comments
48 it might desire in support of its unfavorable recommendation.
Proposed merger in Reading and Mount Penn, Pennsylvania.

The

Feaeral

Deposit Insurance Corporation had requested a report by the
13eard 04 the
competitive factors involved in the proposed merger of
Mt.
Pena Trust Company
, Mount Penn, Pennsylvania, into and with Berks
CcAlrity
Trust Company, Reading, Pennsylvania. A suggested report had
been di
stributed to the members of the Board with a memorandum from the
'Division of
Examinations dated July 1, 1960.
Mr. Nelson stated that Berks County Trust Company, the largest

batik in
Reading, now has about 35 per cent of the deposits of all banks
ill -the county and 22 per cent of the offices. If the merger took place,
it vouia have
per
cent of the deposits and 24 per cent of the offices.
39
Irll'elation to banks
in Reading only, its deposit holdings would be




7/13/60

-6-

increased approximately from

46 per cent to 51 per cent. There would

be a definite lessening of competition because the merger would remove
°Ile bank entirely, but there would be competition remaining in the area.
The

Division of Examinations did not feel that the merger would result

in a material trend toward monopoly.
Governor Robertson stated that the anticipated results of the
111"ger in the city of Reading were more significant than those in the
e°114tY as a whole.

He pointed out that the Berks County Trust Company

ras1 already correspondent for all of the 13 banks in the county and
that With the merger it would hold 51 per cent of the deposits in the
eitY. He then suggested certain changes in the wording of the conclusion of the
proposed report.
Mr. Hackley stated that the bank merger law apparently contemplated that reports on competitive factors would take into account not
°1115r banks but also competition with savings and loan associations.

He

4°ted that there were five relatively large associations in the area.
Mr. Nelson indicated that while savings and loan competition
1148 act by.
--ought out in the conclusion, it was mentioned in the body of
the
report.
After a discussion of changes in the wording of the conclusion,
the re
1/°rt was approved for transmission to the Federal Deposit Insurance
e°1"Pcrati
--on. The conclusion in the report as approved read as follows:
The proposed merger would obviously diminish competition
beeause it
would result in the elimination of one competing
tin
-ancial institution. It would increase the resources of the




7/13/60

-7-

largest bank in the area and provide it with another office
to enhance its already strong competitive position.
Governor Mills cautioned against placing too much reliance on
Pereentages
of deposits and offices in considering reports on cappetittve factors involved in mergers.

He believed that if all the cases

the Board had considered were reviewed, a comparison of percentages
444 reveal a number of inconsistencies in decisions.
Mr. Rackley commented that in the past the use of percentages
14 Connection with measuring banking concentration had been emphasized
48 being

_
nly
a screening device or an indication, and that percentages

811°104 not be given conclusive weight.
Governor Robertson expressed the view that percentages were
n
eeded to paint the picture, but of course they should never be used
Ete the

only basis for a conclusion.
Governor Mills inquired about the prospective volume of merger

ettses coming before the Board.

He indicated that some of them would

1:ll'es'ulliably require attendance by as many Board members as possible,
thieh alight be difficult in the coming weeks.

He noted that the American

tatlk"had recently reported figures on cases that had been decided by
he thliee supervisory agencies, among which the Board was notable for
its absence.

Mr. Nelson reviewed the status and volume of pending cases, and
R.„,—
'''-LeY observed that when the merger law was passed the Office of




2 OA
7/13/60

-8-

the Comptroller of the Currency already had a number of applications
Psending, which the Board did not.
Visit by Mr. Stoddard and Mr. Alley.
that

P14-

Chairman Martin stated

Haward J. Stoddard, President of Michigan National Bank,

elld Mr. James B. Alley, attorney for the bank, had visited his office
'
144 12, 1960, to discuss the rates of interest payable on time and
savings deposits under the Board's Regulation Q.

They had emphasized

the Problem of competi
tion from savings and loan associations and had
131'°11ght a number of advertisements by such associations,
some of which
vere Clearly of an undesirable nature.

Mr. Stoddard had indicated

that during the months since he had first approached the Board about
an
increase in
the maximum interest rate, share accounts in savings
411°' 1°an associations had risen while time deposit
s in banks had decreased.

lie

als° spoke of contentions by banks that savings
and loan associations
were
vriting mortgages up to par and using the proceeds to pay dividends.
—48.n
Martin was of the view that if the charges were correct, the
situat4
-Lon was a bad one. He went on to say that he thought
Mr. Stoddard

va,

Qorrect in saying that people were more rate conscio
us now than

theY

had been a
few years ago, and he expressed his own belief that the
1111311Q had a
right to some benefit from higher interest rates. Some

01' the
ti

13°ints Mr. Stoddard had made were valid, and some concern
ed competi-

conditions that the Board had no way of relieving.

Chairman Martin

el" that he had
assured his visitors that the Board was continuing its




2605

7/13/60

-9-

study of the interest rate problem, and he was reporting their visit
for the information of the Board.
Absorption of exchange charges.

The Board ruled in 1943 that

absorption of exchange charges on checks drawn on out-of-town banks
constituted payment of interest on deposits in violation of Regulation Q.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation took the opposite view, with
the result that there was no restriction in its regulations on absorpti°4 of exchange charges by nonmember insured banks.

Many of those

/58114, therefore, continued to be nonpar banks.
In 1944 the Board ruled that if the actual cost of charging
back exchange was greater than the amount of the exchange itself, absorptl°4 "would not be considered a payment of interest and thus would not
'violate Regulation Q. In 1945 the Board ruled that absorption of
e4ch8nge in any amount up to $2 a month for each customer would be
e°4sidered trivial and would be disregarded.

At the same time, however,

the Board emphasized that, if any bank engaged in the practice of
1180
Iting exchange charges in larger amounts, it would be presumed
t44t the law had been violated.

Stood

Apparently, this ruling was not under-

by all banks to qualify the 1944 ruling.
Governor Robertson referred to discussion by the Board a few

ttl°11tha ago of the practices of banks in Little Rock and elsewhere in
l‘cUti
-ag checks in such a way as to have exchange charges absorbed.
Net,
was done by sending checks to (for example) Republic National Bank




f;

7/13/60

-10-

0f Dallas, Texas, which in turn sent them on to a nonmember bank in
Alexandria, Louisiana, which absorbs the exchange charges in consideration for large deposits of the Republic National.
Governor Robertson stated that a serious competitive problem
1/as developing which he thought the Board should deal with promptly
14 order to avoid a rapid increase in the practice of directly or
indirectly absorbing exchange charges in violation of Board rulings.
The Problem had been accentuated and rendered acute within the last
week or two, especially in the Eighth District, but it also involved
benks in the Sixth, Eleventh, and Tenth Districts.

Governor Robertson

l'elt that the Board was soon going to face a situation in which it
lgolad either have to make a vigorous effort to curb the practice or
ednlit that its rule was unenforceable and take steps to reverse
evious positions in order to enable member banks to absorb exchange
harges the same as nonmember insured banks - otherwise the member
8'114 which conscientiously endeavor to comply with the Board's regulatic)
,
L'e would be put in a competitively disadvantageous position vis-a-vis
those member banks which disregard the Board's ruling.
Mr. Hackley stated that when the Republic National Bank of
1)Etllas had started the practice some months ago, the matter had been
erL UP with the Comptroller of
the Currency, who found that the bank
Vas n
°t violating the regulation because it claimed that the expense
Of ell

arging back the exchange was greater than the amount absorbed.




•••

7/13/60
Governor Robertson reiterated his view that the Board would
soon be faced with the necessity of deciding between reversing its positi°a, in fairness to member banks, or finding ways to enforce it.

He

thouht it would be unfortunate to have to reverse the ruling, because
)111.1ch progress had been made in the last ten years in reducing the number
°r nonpar banks.

He described arrangements he proposed to make looking

tau
—arc" a meeting to be held at one of the Federal Reserve Banks in
144t0a the Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of the four
aistricts he mentioned And the Chief National Bank Examiners in
those districts would participate.

The purpose of the meeting would

be to explore ways in which the Board's ruling could be enforced.
Chairman Martin remarked that the program suggested by Governor
Roberts

appeared to be a good one, and, after brief discussion, the

toard
unanimously approved the holding of a meeting such as Governor
Rc'bertson, had outlined.

The meeting then adjourned.




Secre

4.061

„4..„„
0.0..
0
,*,:tttmA,p

Item No. 1
7/13/60

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 13, 1960

Board of Directors,
Valley Bank and Trust Company,
Springfield, Massachusetts.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request submitted through
the Federal Re3orve Bank of Boston, the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System extends until
September 1, 1960, the time within which Valley Bank
and Trust Company may establish a branch at 82 North
Elm Street, Westfield, Massachusetts, under the
authorization contained in the Board's letter of
July 31, 1959.




Very tray yours,
(Signed) Kenneth A. Kenyon

Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.

2609
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 2

OF THE

7/13/60

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADDRESS

orriciAt. CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 13, 1960

Board of Directors
The Chase Manhattan Bank,
New York, New York.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Board of Governors
Of the Federal Reserve System approves the continued
Operation by The Chase Manhattan Bank of its branches at
37 Wall Street and 43 Exchange Place, New York, New York,
until December 31, 1960.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Kenneth A. Kenyon
Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.

Item No. 3

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

7/13/60

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 13, 1960

Board of Directors,
Nassau Trust Company,
Glen Cave, New York.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request submitted through
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Board
of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System approves the
establishment of a branch at 97 Forest Avenue, Glen
Cove, Nassau County, New York, by the Nassau Trust
CQn1loany, Glen Cove, New York, provided the branch is
established
within six months from the date of this
letter.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No.

OF THE
*
0
,0

7/13/60

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

0
0
0

ADDRESS

OFFICIAL

CORRESPONDENCE

TO THE BOARD

IINSt
4o44*

July 13, 1960

Board of Directors,
Bankers Trust Company,
New York, New York.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Pederal Reserve Bank of New York, the Board of Governors
!PProves the establishment by Bankers Trust Company, New
'ork, New York, of a branch at 280-290 Park Avenue, Borough
01' Manhattan,
City of New York, New York. This approval is
0-ven provided the branch is established by October 1, 1962.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

Item No. 5

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

7/13/60

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 13, 1960

Board of Directors,
First Bank and Trust Company
Of South Bend,
South Bend, Indiana.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request.submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System approves the establishment
of a branch in the vicinity of the intersection of Cleveland
Road and Dixie Highway North, Roseland, Indiana, provided
the branch is established within six months from the date
of this letter.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

26.1.3

Item No. 6

7/13/60
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADDRESS

OFFICIAL

CORRESPONDENCE

TO THE aDARD

July 13, 1960

Board of Directors,
Commercial State Savings Bank,
Greenville, Michigan.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System approves the establishment
of the branch at 112 W. Second Street, Trufant, Michigan,
bY Commercial State Savings Bank, provided the branch is
established within six months from the
date of this letter.
It is understood that the capital structure of
the bank
will be increased $60l000 through the sale of
a
dditional common stock.




Very truly yours,

(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No.

OF THE

7

7/13/60

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADDREIIS

orriciAL

CORRESPONDENCE

TO THE SOARD

July 13, 1960

Board of Directors,
County Bank of Santa Cruz,
Santa Cruz, California.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System approves the establishment of a
branch in the vicinity of the intersection of Sea Cliff Drive
and Cabrillo Highway, Aptos, California, by County Bank of
Santa Cruz, provided the branch is established within one
Year from the date of this letter.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

Item No. 8

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

0
:,1::404
44,
„000

2615

7/13/60

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
ADDRESS

'0,4wits
"440*

orriciAL

CORRESPONDENCE

TO THE BOARD

July 13, 1960

The Honorable Jesse P. Wolcott,
Chairman,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear. Mr, Wolcott:
Reference is made to your letter of June 28, 1960,
concerning the application of Home Bank, Compton, California,
for continuance of deposit insurance after withdrawal from
the Federal Reserve
System.
,
No corrective programs which the Board believes
!hould be incorporated as conditions to the continuance of
clePosit insurance have been urged upon or agreed to by the
bank




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Kenneth A. Kenyon

Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.

Item No.

9

7/13/60

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

*
a

WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADDRESS orriciAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE *WARD

4t Itat
40,
'0401,*

July 13, 1960

muL
Mr. Jesse
W. Tapp, Chairman of the
Board of Directors,
pank of
41 BroadAmerica,
Street,
New York is, New
York.
Dear Mr. Tapp:
There are enclosed two copies of the report of examina
of the Guatemala Branch and La Torre Agency.
, Guatemala
Cit
Guatemala, of Bank of America made as of April 23, 1960,
examiners for the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve
uystem. The
second copy of the report is for the information
files of the officer in charge of the branch.
After the report has been presented to your directors
Z31
'thAi,
to th
consideration, please advise the Board of Governors as
el
e actions taken or
contemplated with respect to the assets
mf!seitied on page 8 of the report. Any comment you may care to
vith regard to the operations of the
branch and agency as
-441closed by the report will be
appreciated.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.
Mires