View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

0•17'

A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Systern

was held in Washington on Tuesday, July 13, 1937, at 10:45 a. r.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman (Part of meeting)
Ransom, Vice Chairman
Broderick
McKee
Davis

Mr. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Clayton, Assistant to the Chairman
Mr. Thurston, Special Assistant to the
Chairman
Mr. Wyatt, General Counsel
Mr. Paulger, Chief of the Division of
Examinations
Mr. Goldenweiser, Director of the Division
of Research and Statistics
Mr. Smead, Chief of the Division of Bank
Operations
Mr. Dreibelbis, Assistant General Counsel
Mr. Leonard, Assistant Chief of the Division
of Examinations
Mr. Ransom submitted for consideration the following statement
Of Procedure which
he had discussed with individual members of the Board
Prior to this meeting:
"The Board shall meet regularly on Tuesday and Friday
Of each week.
The forenoon of these two days shall be devoted first to matters on the regular docket, which shall be
taken up in order and disposed of or laid upon the table.
Any member of the Board or the staff, who has a matter to
came before the Board for consideration at these meetings,
will notify the Secretary's office not later than noon the
Preceding day and the Secretary's office shall prepare the
docket from these notices and shall circulate it not later
than three o'clock on the same day. Matters may not be put
Upon the docket later than noon on Monday and Thursday. Matters for consideration at Board meetings shall, wherever possible, be circulated to all members of the Board before being
considered at meetings. After the regular docket has been
disposed of, other subjects not on the docket may be considered for Board action.




952
7/13/37

-2-

"Wherever any member of the Board has a matter for Board
consideration, which is placed upon the docket, in order to
conserve the time of the Board members, it is suggested that
the member shall be prepared to submit at the time the matter
is reached on the docket a resolution covering his recommendations on this specific matter. Should the member not be prepared to make a specific recommendation at the time, be shall
then be prepared to present the reasons both for and against
the proposal that is to be considered.
"The Board may meet in an informal executive session on
Tuesday and Friday afternoons at two thirty o'clock. The
question of whether or not to so meet shall be decided before
the adjournment of the morning meeting. At executive sessions
allY matter may be considered, end there shall be no formal
docket for these meetings and no final action shall be taken
at these meetings nor any minutes kept of the discussions unless the Secretary of the Board is requested to attend and
record all proceedings.
"The Board shall be subject to call at any time at the
request of any member of the Board."
Upon motion by Mr. Broderick the
foregoing procedure was approved unanimously.
Mr. Ransom referred to an amendment proposed by Senator Herring
to S. 2344, Trust Indenture Act of 1937, which would substitute for the
bill as
introduced by Senator Barkley an amendment to subsection 11(k)
of the
Federal Reserve Act adding to the subsection three new paragraphs
d.
the

placing additional responsibilities on the Board in connection with
exercise of trust powers by national banks with respect particularly

to trust indentures.

The proposed amendment had been circulated among

the members of
the Board with a memorandum dated July 7, 1937, from Mr.
Re""°m-

Mr. Ransom stated that it did not appear from conversations

which he had had recently with interested parties that the amendment referred to or
any other amendment to S. 2344 which would place the reellonsibility for
the administration of the legislation with the Board




953
7/13/37

-3-

rather than with the Securities and Exchange Commission was being given
serious consideration and that it did not appear that any action need
be taken by
the Board with respect to the amendment proposed by Senator
Herring.

The other members of the Board concurred in the opinion ex-

pressed by Mr. Ransom.
Reference was made to a letter addressed to Chairman Eccles
under date of July 2, 1937, by Senator Smith, Chairman of the Commit-

tee on
Agriculture and Forestry, transmitting a copy of bill S. 1990
(Thomas bill) relating to the control of commodity prices through the
r
egulation of the value of the dollar and requesting that, if possible,
a report be
submitted on the bill prior to hearings on the proposed
legislation which will be held in the near future.

There were dis-

tributed among the members of the Board copies of a draft of a reply
to

Senator Smith's letter which had been prepared by Mr. Goldenweiser

and Mr. Upham of the Treasury Department.
At this point Chairman Eccles joined the meeting.
During a discussion of the draft of reply Mr. Davis suggested
that the
Board endeavor to agree upon a general statement of principles
which would be applicable to the major questions involved in various
bills before Congress having as their objective currency or price stabilization, with a view to using such a statement in replying to the
l'equeet received from
Senator Smith and any similar requests.




At the conclusion of the discussion
Mr. Goldenweiser was requested to draft
such a statement, copies of which would

954
7/13/37

-4be furnished to the members of the Board
for study prior to consideration at a meeting to be held at 10:30 a. m. on Thursday,
July 15, 1937.
Chairman Eccles referred to the conferences which had been held

from time to time by Mr. Morrill with Mr.
W. G. Distler, Vice President
of the George
A. Fuller Company, regarding the progress being made on
the 4uard's
D's
new building.

He referred to the fact that under the con-

tract the
building was to have been available on June 1, 1937, but that
it had
became more and more evident as time went on that there would be
a co
nsiderable delay in completion, and that there was no certainty as
to a
date when it would be ready for occupancy.
stances,

In view of these circum-

Chairman Eccles said that, after discussing the situation with

Messrs. Ransom and McKee together with Messrs. Morrill and Clayton, he
11(1 called Mr. Lou R. Crandall, President of the George A. Fuller CornOn the telephone on the afternoon of July 9 and had advised him
that s
atisfactory progress was not being made, that the promises as to
dates of campletion which had been made by Mr. Distler had not been fulfilled

that it appeared that the company was evidently not employing a

silfrioient number of men and was not doing any overtime work, and that
the
delay was resulting in considerable expense and inconvenience to the
"
111 rd.

Mr. Crandall replied, Chairman Eccles said, that -while he was

lee7ing for Europe the next day, he would take the matter up immediately
and leave it
in good hands and gave assurance that any necessary actiOn
*
)
111d be
taken.

Chairman Eccles stated that on the morning of July 10

Mr. Distler
called on him and discussed the matter, that additional work




955
7/13/37
i8

now being done, and that Mr. Distler had renewed his promise to make

the building
available for occupancy by July 26.

Chairman Eccles added

that Mr.
Distler and he had agreed to make a joint inspection of the
building on the afternoon of July 15 to determine the progress and status
Of the work
and, if possible, the date upon which it will be made available.

Mr. Morrill added that in the conversation with Mr. Distler at-

tention was called to the fact that Mr. Morrill was under instructions
from the
Board to withhold a sufficient amount from the voucher for work
done

In

June to make up the full 10% provided for under the terms of the

contIllet, and that it was understood that the Board would give further
consideration
to this payment after the inspection which was to be made
oa Thursday
afternoon July 15, 1937.
Mr. Morrill said that this morning, July 13, Mr. Distler had
ed the question whether the staff in the offices in the Shoreham
building would be moved on July 23 or 24 as Mr. Distler contended that
the

necessary space could be made ready by that time.

Mr. Morrill stated

that he
told Mr. Distler that he felt that the answer to that question
h°uld be deferred
until after Thursday of this week and that Mr. Distler
a8reed.

All of the members of the Board concurred in the suggestion that

It would be
undesirable to occupy any portion of the building until the
elitire building is made available and that arrangements should be made
to move all of the offices of the Board on the weekend following the
date on
which the entire building is ready for occupancy.
Chairman Eccles then advised the members of the Board of a con17ersati0n which he had had
on July 9, 1937, with Senator Radcliffe of




956
7/13/37

-6-

Maryland with respect to the proposed plan of the Union Trust Company
Of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for liquidation of the City Certificates
Corporation.
Benjamin H.

Senator Radcliffe stated, Chairman Eccles said, that Mr.

Brewster, Jr., Chairman of the Executive Committee of the

bank) had asked that arrangements be made for him to meet with the Board
tc3r a further discussion
of the matter.
had

Chairman Eccles stated that he

advised Senator Radcliffe that the Board had spent considerable time

on the
proposal and that if Mr. Brewster desired to pursue it further
he should take
it up with Mr. McKee as the member of the Board having
primerY

supervision of such matters.

Senator Radcliffe stated, Chairman

Eccles said, that he did not differ with the position taken by the Board
with respect to the proposed plan of liquidation and that he had recommended to the
parties concerned that before proceeding further the consent of the holders of certificates of beneficial interest and stockholders of the
bank to the plan be obtained.
During Chairman Eccles' statement Mr. Wingfield, Assistant General
Counsel, joined the
meeting.
It was stated that the extension of time granted at the meeting
Of the
Board on June 30, 1937, to Mr. T. 0. Morton, President and Director Of the Taylor National Bank, Campbellsville, Kentucky, to file a
biler in connection with his citation by the Board under section 30 of
the B"king Act of 1933 to show cause why he should not be removed as
director and
officer of the bank expired yesterday and that, therefore,
6111 of the
information to be considered by the Board in reaching a de1ii the matter
was now before it.




Copies of a memorandum prepared

957
7/13/37

-7-

by*. Dreibelbis under date of July 9, 1937, containing a summary of
the charges
made and of the evidence offered by representatives of the
Comptroller of
the Currency at the hearing in St. Louis on June 7, 1937,
had been
sent to the members of the Board on July 12.
It was agreed that the matter should be
taken up for consideration at the meeting on
Thursday, July 15, 1937.
At this point Chairman Eccles withdrew from the meeting and Mr.
Vest, Assistant General Counsel, entered the
room.
There was presented a draft of a letter to the French American
Banking Corporation, New York, New York, referring to the Board's letter to
the Corporation under date of March 12, 1937, and stating that
Pursuant to the
request contained in the Corporation's letter of June 9
the Board was
amending the agreement of June 25, 1919, as amended, between the
Corporation and the Board, to provide that the Corporation
shall maintain against
all deposits received in the United States a reserve of not less than 13%.

The letter had been circulated among the

Members of the
Board and Mr. Broderick had suggested that, inasmuch as
the p_
vurPoration was a competitor of all large banks in New York for
French

deposits, and as, in his opinion, there was no reason why it

should have
an advantage over member banks with respect to reserve requirements, he would
like to have the letter considered at a meeting of
the Board.
During the ensuing discussion it was pointed out that, in
l'e8PcInse to the Board's letter of March 12, the French American Banking
e°rPoration, under date of March 16, had advised that it did not desire




958
7/13/37
to request
a change in the agreement but might subsequently discuss
the matter
with the Board, and under date of Stine 9 had requested that
the amendment
to the agreement referred to in the Board's letter of
March 12, 1937,
be made.
At the conclusion of the discussion,
Mr. Broderick moved that counsel be requested
to prepare a letter to the French American
Banking Corporation advising that the Board
had reconsidered the matter and was of the
Opinion that the agreement should not be
changed and that the Corporation should continue to maintain reserves in the same amount
as are required by law to be maintained by
member banks located in central reserve
cities.
Carried unanimously.
Mr. Broderick then moved that counsel
also be requested to prepare an amendment
to the existing agreement with the First of
Boston International Corporation, Boston,
Massachusetts, and an amendment to Regulation K, Banking Corporations Authorized to
do Foreign Banking Business under the Terms
of Section 25(a) of the Federal Reserve Act,
(which would apply to The Chase Bank, New
York, New York, the only corporation organized under the provisions of section
25(a) of the Federal Reserve Act now in
operation), which would substitute for the
present requirement, that reserves of 13%
be maintained on deposits received in the
United States, a requirement that the respective corporations maintain reserves
in the same amount as are required by law
to be maintained by member banks located
in central reserve cities.
Carried unanimously.
There was then presented a draft of letter to Mr. Logan, Vice

Pre"4 ,

oluent and
General Counsel at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,




959
7/13/37

-9-

reading as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of April 30,
1937 requesting the Board's approval of the payment of
$3,506.47 to Davis Polk, Wardwell, Gardner & Reed, Esqs.,
for services and expenses in the case of Finkelstein v. the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York as well as your further
letter of June 23, 1937 addressed to Mr. Walter Wyatt, giving further information with respect to the extent of the
services of the aforesaid attorneys.
"The Board has carefully considered the contents of
both letters and since your bank feels that the services of
these attorneys have been of great value and that their bill
iS reasonable,
you are advised that the Board authorizes the
Payment to them of 0,506.47 as requested."
After discussion of the letter in the
light of a memorandum addressed to the
Board by Mr. Dreibelbis under date of July
2, 1937, Mr. Ransom moved that the letter
be approved.
Carried, Mr. Broderick not voting.
At this point Messrs. Thursto
n, Wyatt, Paulger, Goldenweiser,
'lead,

Dreibelbis, Leonard, Wingfield and Vest left the meeting and

e°nsideration
was then given to each of the matters hereinafter referred
to and the
action stated with respect thereto was taken by the Board:
The minutes of the
meeting of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve
System held on July 12, 1937, were approved unanimously.

Telegram to

Nil%

Sargent, Secretary of the Federal Reserve Bank

Of San Francisco,
stating that the Board approves the establishment
without change by
the bank today of the rates of discount and purchase
in its
existing schedule.




Approved unanimously.

Q

7/13/37

-10Letter to Mr. Drinnen, First Vice President of the Federal Re-

serve Bank of Phila
delphia, reading as follows:
"In accordance with the request contained in your letter of July 9, the Board approves the continuation of the
temporary assignment of Mr. Montford H. Hughes to the position of General Clerk, Fiscal Agency Department, at his
present salary of 0,220 per annum, which is 4;)420 in excess
of the maximum provided in the personnel classification plan
for this position, for a period not to exceed six months
from July 15, 1937.
"
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Young, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank
°f Chicago, reading as follows:
"Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of July 6,
1937, advising that your Executive Commi
ttee has recommended that the leave of absence granted Mr. Carol L. Pitman in order that he might assist the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation be further extended to December
31,
1937, sabject to the approval of the Board of Governors
and the
Retirement System.
"The Board interposes no objection to such an extension, and it is assum
ed that the matter, so far as it affects the Retir
ement System, has been referred to the Retirement Committee."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Honorable Ambrose J. Kennedy, Chairman, Committee
on
Claims,

House of Representatives
, reading as follows:

"This refers to your letter of June
2, 1937, addressed
to Chairman
Eccles, inclosing a copy of the bill, H. R.
6319 'For the
Relief of Banks Business College'.
"As you were advis
ed in our letter of Tune 17th, the
Board did not
have sufficient information on which to base
!reply and,
accordingly, communicated with the Federal Reserve Bank of
Philadelphia regarding the matter. The Board
has now
received from the Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelPhia a
statement with regard to the facts of this matter,
end there
are inclosed copies of the statement and of
two
Xhibits attached
thereto.




frt.
a.

7/13/37

-11-

"We hope that the inclosed statement will give you the
information which you desire in this connection."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Schaller, Chairman, Leased Wire Committee, reading as
follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of May 25 and to my
reply of May 28, 1937, with respect to a survey of the Washington-Atlanta, Washington-Richmond, Washington-Cleveland,
Washington-Philadelphia, and New York-Boston circuits of the
main lines of the Leased Wire System to determine whether
the adoption of TWX service on these circuits would be advisable.
"The American Telephone and Telegraph Company has submitted a report under date of July 1, 1937, a copy of which
is attached, recommending the installation of TWX equipment
on the first four circuits referred to. In a conversation
With a representative of the company on July 7 he stated
that the study of the New York-Boston circuit had been referred to the New York office of the company and that he would
ask that office
to expedite the recommendation as much as possible.
"If, as a result of these recommendations and the recommendations which it is understood have been or will be submitted to you by the American Telephone and Telegraph Company
With respect to the Chicago-St. Louis, Chicago-Kansas City
and Chicago-San Francisco circuits, the present services
on all main line circuits except Chicago-New York, ChicagoWashington, and
Washington-New York, are changed to TWX installations,
consideration should be given to the question
Whether the delays which may occur in the various offices
While waiting to accumulate sufficient business to justify
a connection
with another office will interfere to any serious
extent with wire transfers of funds and securities and other
rush telegrams. Therefore, the Board suggests that, before
the recommendat
ion of the Leased Wire Committee as to the
ction to be
taken on the recommendations of the Telephone
is submitted, the Committee take the matter up with
l
the
Federal reserve banks and ascertain whether they would
have
ave any objection to such delays or whether they have any
comments or suggestions to make with respect to the proposed
in
stallations.
"The local representative of the Telephone Company has
info
med this office that the company's Chicago representaVe has been advised of the recommendations contained in
the attached
letter and that he will be pleased to discuss
the matter
with you should you care to do so.

Z




:1

962
7/13/37

-12-

"The general use of TWX equipment will afford an opportunity to effect savings in expense by reducing wherever
possible the number of telegrams transmitted over the leased
wires. In view of this situation, it is felt thet the question presented in your telegram of June 28, 1937, with respect to the use of code words in telegrams and the method
of counting words in messages transmitted over the leased
wires should be considered in connection with the determinetlOn of
the question of the general instructions to be issued
by each
Federal reserve bank with respect to communications
sent by the bank over the leased wires, the use of code words
in such communications, the policy to be followed by the bank
witle respect to delaying messages while waiting to accumulate
sufficient business to justify asking for a connection, and
Other related matters which would have as their objective the
Use of the TAX
service in the most economical manner possible
consistent with the purposes of the Leased Wire System. It
is suggested
that this Problem be studied by the Leased lire
Committee and that when a tentative draft of such instructions has been prepared by the Committee it be submitted to
the Federal
reserve banks and the Board for their comments
and suggestions.
"In regard to the basis for counting words in messages
sent over the Leased
Wire System, the Board is agreeable to
the adoption
of the basis recently accepted by the telegraph
companies. Such a procedure, however, would result in a substantial increase in the per-word cost of messages sent over
the Leased Wire System,
including the reimbursable messages
sent for the
account of various Government agencies. In
order to ascertain
as nearly as possible to what extent the
Per word
cost would be increased by counting each complete
number in a telegra
m as one word, this office, prior to the
announcement by
the telegraph companies of the adoption of
the new
basis referred to above, made a count of all messages
?irt from the
Washinfeton office during the month of May on
the old basis
as well as on the basis of counting a complete
number as one
word. On the old basis 504,985 words were sent
by the
Washington office as compared with 247,627 words on
the new
basis or slightly over 49% of the number of words
,n the old
basis. The number of words reported as having
been sent
by the Federal reserve banks was reduced in this
Proportion and the cost per word figured on the changed basis.
Under the
present procedure the cost per word was $.015764906
based on a
total of 1,360,990 words as compared with a perWord cost of
.i.03214932 on the basis of 667,382 words under
1the new method
of counting. While the Der-word cost on the
ls now used by the telegraph companies for counting would
!
reduce the
higher per-word cost substantially, it is believed




963
7/13/37

-13-

"that it would still exceed 2i¢ and if that cost were doubled
to cover the cost
of transmitting reimbursable massages over
the main lines and
a branch line it would undoubtedly be regarded by the Government agencies as excessive. Accordingly,
it is suggested that, before a change is made in the present
method of counting, this question be considered by the Leased
Wire Committee and a recommendation made as to the action to
be taken."




Approved unanimously.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

‹bR4:1-427:4

lect1
737;7:
1:"7
5
7
-.
-1"