View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for

To:

July 12,

1957

Members of the Board

From: Office of the Secretary
Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard
to the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will
advise the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, if you
were present at the meeting, please initial in column A below to indicate that you approve the minutes.
If you were not present, please initial in column B
below to indicate that you have seen the minutes.

Chm. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
.1 Gov. Vardaman

X

Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov, Balderston
Gov. Shepardson

/ Withdrew from




etlr

at point indicated in mi

194.
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on Friday, July 12, 1957.

The Board met in the

Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mt.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
Vardaman 27./
Mills
Robertson
Shepardson
Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Hackley, General Counsel
Masters, Director, Division of
Examinations
Mr. Hostrup, Assistant Director,
Division of Examinations
Mr. Hooff, Assistant Counsel

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Items circulated to the Board. The following items, which
484 been circulated to the members of the Board and copies of 'which
ere attached to these minutes under the respective item numbers
indicated, were approved unanimously:
Item No.
Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
"roving the temporary retention in active service
'
five employees beyond normal retirement dates.
Letter to Carlen Realty Company, Tarpon Springs,
Pio
e„fida, regarding the company's status as a holding
-"TanY affiliate.
to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta regarding
1Ttterpreceding
item.

Y

With
—drew




from meeting at point indicated in minutes.

1

2

3

1948
7/12/57

-2Item No.

Letter to the Internal Revenue Service inquiring
'Whether there would be any Objection on the part
Of the Service to the proposed deletion of a
,Pecified footnote to section 10(c) of Regulation F.
tWith the understanding that the letter would be sent
after the subject had been discussed with the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency)

4

Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
concerning the application of section 4(c) of Regulation T, relating to special cash accounts. (With
the understanding that copies would be sent to the
Presidents of all Federal Reserve Banks)

5

Letter to Bank of America, New York, New York, approving
the purchase of shares of Societe Anonyme Immdbiliere
and a change in the location of the bank's Paris branch.
For transmittal through the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York)

6

Discount rates.

There were presented telegrams proposed to

be sent to the following Federal Reserve Banks approving the establishMeat without change by those Banks on the dates indicated of the rates
(If discount and purchase in their existing schedules:
San Francisco
New York
Cleveland
Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St. Louis
Kansas City
Dallas

July
July
July
July
July
July
July
July
July

10
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11

The telegrams were approved unanimously.
Mr. Hooff then withdrew from the meting and Mr. Thomas,
e°nc)mic Adviser to the Board, entered the room.




7/12/57
Salt Lake City Branch building program

(Item No. 7).

In a

telegram dated July 11, 1957, President Mangels of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco advised that the directors of the Bank
had voted to approve the installation of additional piling at an
estimated cost of *7,500 to permit the construction of additional
vault facilities in the new Salt Lake City branch building.

Mr.

Mangels' telegram also stated that when estimates became available,
consideration could be given to the desirability of proceeding with
construction of another vault, depending on the need for additional
racilities for emergency storage of currency.

In any event, the

Proposed expenditure for piling at this time would be good insurance
exid would effect considerable savings if the vault were needed later.
In a memorandum dated July 11, 1957, which had been distributed to
the members of the Board along with copies of Mr. Mangels' telegram,
Leonard explained that the proposal to install additional piling
resulted from discussions arising out of the suggestion that Salt
Lake City would be a desirable location for the storage of emergency
811PPlies of currency as part of the defense planning program.

A

ProPosed telegram to President Mangels which would state that the

BOA,,A

approved the installation of the additional piling was submitted

With the memorandum.
Following a brief discussion, unanimous approval was given to
the proposed telegram to President Mangels.
to these minutes as Item No. 7.




A copy thereof is attached

7/12/57

-4111Xtension of time for filing Hearing Examiner's report (Item

trat..a.

In a memorandum dated July 9, 1957, Mr. Arthur Leff, Hearing

Examiner on the applications of General Contract Corporation, St. Louis,
Missouri, for determinations pursynnt to section 4(c)(6) of the Bank
Holding Company Act, requested, for reasons stated, that the time within
which he might file his report be extended from July 16, 1957, to
September 15, 1957.

Copies of Mr. Left's memorandum had been sent to

the members of the Board with a memorandum from the Legal Division
dated July 10, 1957, which expressed the view that the Hearing Examiner's
request was reasonable, particularly because the case presented important

and novel questions under the pertinent statutory provisions. Submitted
vith the Legal Division's memorandum was a draft of Order which might
be issued by the Board.
Pursuant to the Legal Division's recommendation, the Board

'=Izes.znal unanimously

the issuance of an Order extending until September

15, 1957, the time for filing of the Hearing Examiner's report, with

the understanding that copies of the Order would be sent to the Hearing
Xe-miner, General Contract Corporation, and other appropriate parties.

A coPY of the Order is attached to these minutes as Item No, 8.
Application of Hamilton National Associates, Inc., for general
4'5.1 1:11L2e
.Imit (Item No. 92. There had been distributed to the members

°I' the

Board copies of a memorandum from the Division of Examinations

thated July 9, 1957, discussing the application of Hamilton National
Associates, Inc., Chattanooga, Tennessee, for a general voting permit




1951
-5-

7/12/57

Covering its stock in eleven subsidiary banks.

A supplemental memo-

randum snalyzed the application in the light of the factors required
to be considered by the Board pursuant to section 5144 of the Revised
Statutes of the United States.

On the basis of this analysis, it

Igas the recommendation of the Division that the general voting permit
be granted.
After Mr. Hostrup had commented in response to certain questions
raised by Governor Balderston, the Board voted unanimously in favor of
issuance of the requested general voting permit.
Seat

A copy of the telegram

to the Federal Reserve Agent at Atlanta pursuant to this action

is attached to these minutes as Item No. 9.
At this point Messrs. Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman, and
Cc/nkling, Assistant Director, Division of Bank Operations, entered the
room.
Response to questions raised by Congressman Patman (Item No.

lal.

At the meeting of the Board on July 10, 1957, preliminary con-

sideration was given to the response that should be made to certain
Itlestions concerning the operations of the Federal Reserve System that
/gere raised by Congressman Patman in a letter to Chairman Martin dated
J41,, 8,

1957.

Pursuant to the understanding at that time, the staff

Ilaa. compiled proposed answers to the respective questions to the extent




7/12/57

-6-

that time and the available information permitted.

The suggested

answers had been distributed to the members of the Board before
this meeting, along with a draft of transmittal letter to Congressman
Patman.
The proposed replies were reviewed by the Board in detail,
certain suggestions were made for changes therein, and the phrasing
or the transmittal letter also was changed slightly.
During the discussion Governor Vardaman withdrew from the
illeeting. Before leaving, however, he indicated that he was satisfied
Lth the proposed replies, subject to their being revised to the extent
agreed upon at this meeting.
At the conclusion of the discussion, the replies to the re8Pective questions, revised in the light of the comments made at
this meeting, were approved unanimously for transmittal to Congressman
Patman early Monday morning. The letter of transmittal was approved
in the form attached to these minutes as Item No. 10.
pata on local government bond sales (Item No. 11).

There

been sent to the members of the Board copies of a memorandum dated
a4-101

"4-1.,

1957, from Mr. Riefler, Mr. Koch, Assistant Director, Division

Research and Statistics) and Miss Stockwell, Economist in that
sion, submitting a draft of letter to the Presidents of all Federal

ReBerve Banks which would request certain information on interest costs
44(1 credit ratings of small bond issues of municipal and other local




1953
7/12/57

-7s old during the first quarter of

1957. This would

supplement the Boardls earlier inquiry of February

15, 1957, made

in connection with its report on S. 775, a bill to encourage member
h4nk investment in State and local government obligations through
the medium of specialized investment companies. It was stated that
the data
proposed to be requested would be useful in connection with
P°esible Congressional inquiries, and also in arriving at a judgment
with regard to the effect of monetary restraint on the small municipality.
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the memorandum, it

.u.a191. unanimously

to request the Federal Reserve Banks to supply

the information in question.

A copy of the letter sent to the Banks

Pursuant to this action is attached hereto as Item No._11.
Mr. Conkling then withdrew from the meeting.
Survey of Consumer Finances. In a memorandum dated July 10,
195,7
1, copies of which had been sent to the members of the Board,
14e8"e. Robinson, Adviser, and Williams, Assistant Director, Division
t Research and Statistics, recommended that the staff be authorized
to enter into a contract at this time with the Survey Research Center
or

the University of Michigan for continuation in 1958 of the Survey

°t Consumer Finances. The proposed budget provision for this work was
4163,000, $13,000 higher than in 1957, and the amount would be incorP°1"sted in the regular budget of the Division of Research and Statistics.

Ihe

memorandum pointed out that since 1951 the annual budget for the




I9,
7/12/57

-8-

Survey had been held at $150,000, and actual outlays had been within
a few thousand dollars of that figure, despite rising salaries and
Other costs.

However, two recent cost of living increases granted

by the University had further affected the Research Center's costs
Etna the proposed increase in the contract cost for the 1958 Survey
uas considered to be warranted.

As in the past, the contract amount

Would be a maximum figure, with actual disbursements to be based on
the submission of certified vouchers of direct and indirect costs.
Governor Shepardson stated that he had discussed the matter
with representatives of the Division of Research and Statistics and
the Controller's Office, that the Board's staff had for some years
been resisting an increase in the contract figure, and that the number
°I' interviews in the Survey had been reduced to what appeared to be a
illinimum consistent with appropriate sampling techniques.

These steps

having been taken, it seemed to him that the proposed increase in the
contract amount was justifiable in the light of the Survey Research
Center's increased costs.
Governor Balderston then made a statement in which he said
that

while he would have no objection to authorizing a continuation

Of the Survey of Consumer Finances in 1958, he felt that upon the
l'eturn of
Mr. Young, Director of the Division of Research and Statistics,
th°11ght should be given to the possibility of turning the Survey over
tO

'he sponsorship of some private organization such as the Ford Foun-

t1°11. He observed that although the Survey, a unique pioneering




7/12/57
effort, was expensive for the System to conduct, criticisms had been
made by the special committee which looked into the matter at the
Board's request in connection with the Talle Subcommittee studies relating to Government statistics.

These criticisms pointed to the

need for changes which would make the Survey more effective but which
vould also involve additionAl expense. Therefore, he suggested that
the year ahead be devoted to studying ways and means of placing the
Survey on the soundest possible basis, looking toward its eventual
financing by some other interested organization.
Governor Balderston's comments having been noted, Chairman
Martin suggested that the staff be authorized to enter into a contract
for the 1958 Survey on the basis recommended, with the understanding
that this represented no commitment on the part of the Board to continue
the Surveys after 1958 and that before the middle of next year the staff
'would explore all aspects of the matter.
The procedure suggested by Chairman Martin was approved unani-

During the foregoing discussion Mr. Robinson, Adviser, Division
Of Research and Statistics, was called into the meeting.
System for mechanization of check processing (Item No. 12).
In a memorandum dated July 10, 1957, which had been distributed to

the members of the Board, Messrs. Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
IC°ch, Assistant Director, Division of Research and Statistics, and




19,513
-10-

7/12/57

Eckert, Chief of the Banking Section in that Division, recommended
that the Board send a letter to the Technical Committee on Mechanization
Of Check Handling of the American Bankers Association inviting the
Committee's attention to the desirability of incorporating a coding
sYstem for identification of type of depositor in the automated check
handling procedures being developed by the Committee.

The memorandum

stated that provision for such coding would minimize the cost and the
reporting burden on respondent banks in supplying information such as
that obtained in the annual deposit ownership survey and would also
mean that needed information, such as data on debits by ownership
gl'°uP, might be obtained in the not too distant future.

The owner-

ship coding problem had been discussed informally by members of the
Board's staff with members of the Committee, and it was understood
that a communication from the Board would be desirable as a basis for
Placing the matter on the Committee's agenda.

The memorandum also

noted that interest had been expressed by the Bureau of the Budget
in

the coding problem.
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the memorandum,

114antmous approval was given to the letter to the Chairman of the
Technical Committee of which a copy is attached hereto as Item No.12.
Arrangements for Otto Bremer Company hearing
At the
meeting of the Board on July

3,

(Item No. 13).

1957, the staff was authorized

t° make arrangements for the hearing required under the Bank Holding
C°mPanY Act with respect to a request by Otto Bremer Comparv, St. Paul,




7/12/57

-11-

Minnesota, for a determination under section 4(c)(6) of the Act.
In a memorandum dated July 11, 1957, which had been distributed
to the members of the Board, Mr. Hackley reported that arrangements
had been made for the detail of Mr. Arthur Leff to the Board as
Hearing Examiner for an additional period of six months beginning
August 1) 1957, that Mr. Leff therefore would be able to preside
at the Otto Bremer Company hearing, that Mr. Sigurd Ueland, Vice
President and Counsel of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,
had agreed to serve as Board Counsel in connection with the hearing,
and that Mr. G. W. Lamphere) Assistant General Counsel for the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, had agreed to assist Mr. Ueland.
After consultation, it appeared that it would be convenient for
ell parties to begin the hearing at the Minneapolis Reserve Bank
°4 August 20, 1957.

Accordingly, there was submitted a draft of

Order for Hearing which might be issued by the Board.
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in Mr. Hackley's
temorandum, unanimous approval was given to the Order, of which a
COPY is
attached hereto as Item No. 13, with the understanding
the.t copies would be sent to Otto Bremer Company and other approPriate parties and that the Order would be published in the Federal
Register.

The meeting then adjourned.




1958
7/12/57

-12Secretary's Note: Pursuant to recommendations
contained in memoranda from appropriate individuals concerned, Governor Shepardson approved
on behalf of the Board on July 11, 1957, the
following items affecting the Board's staff:

Transfer and salary increase
Nyart S. Sharigan, from the position of Clerk-Stenographer in the
Division of Bank Operations to the position of Secretary in the Division
of International Finance, with an increase in basic annual salary from
Y3,925 to $4,075, effective the date she assumes her new duties.
.§.:214111:7 increases, effective July 14, 1957

llama and title

Division

Basic annual salary
From
To

Office of the Secretary
$4,890

$5,065

3194C

4,075

3,415
6,820

3,500
7,035

Patricia C. Fitmaurice, Clerk
3,175
IlancY S. Martino, Economist5,440

3,260
5,575

Doreen Dippre, Secretary
Legal
EUgene C. Harrison, Clerk
Research and Statistics
Eleanor J. Pratt, Clerk
Relmut F. Wendel, Economist

International Finance

Bank Operations
4Yart S. Sharigan Clerk-Stenographer
thleen Edwards,
'
Clerk-Stenographer




3,755

3,840

3,415

3,500

1959

7/12/57

-13-

Salary increases, effective July 14, 1957 (continued)

Name and title

Division

Basic annual salary
To
From

Examinations
Jerome T. Kelley, Senior Federal Reserve Examiner

$10,535

$10,750

Administrative Services
Robert H. Craft, Operator, Tabulating Equipment
3,755 3,840
4,930
Donald B. Fitzhugh, Tabulation PlEtnner
5//AO
4,350
4,525
Rerbert E. Haney, Operator, Tabulating Equipment
7)465
Davis H. Wilson, Chief, Machine Tabulation and
7,785
Telegraph Section




1960
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 1
7/12/57

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 12,

1957

Mr. Frederick L. Deming, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,
Minneapolis 2, Minnesota.
near Mr. Deming:
In view of the circumstances outlined in your letter of
hne 26, 1957, to Mr. Sprecher concerning the extension of retirement
d4tes for five of your employees, the Board of Governors approves the
retehtion in service and the payment of salary to the following
persons throucth the dates indicated:
Name
James A. McDonald
Gregg Wilson
James P. Clark
Emma A. Engen
Edward A. Daly
the
fh

Extended Through
October 21, 1957
October 23, 1957
November 3, 1957
December 29, 1957
December 30, 1957

It is understood that if the benefits from the changes in
p
,Letirement System become effective prior to any of these dates,
se retentions will extend only to such prior date.




Very truly yours,

(Signed) S. R. Carpenter

S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
0,010,44,4.

- 44 1,
0

Item No. 2

OF THE

,
,%9•10'Qop,*4,

7/12/57

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

14Z;
,
tva4t

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 12, 1957
Mr. A. L. Ellis, President,
Carlen Realty Company,
Tarpon Springs, Florida.
Dear Mr. Ellis:
This refers to the request contained in your letter of
May 20, 1957, submitted through the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta,
!:or a determination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
,ystem as to the future status of Carlen Realty Company, Tarpon Springs,
'Iorida, as a holding company affiliate.
From the information submitted, the Board understands that
Carl
-en Realty Company is principally engaged in the business of
acquiring developing, remodeling and constructing buildings and other;!'se improving real estate for investment, income and profit from sales;
that Carlen Realty Company owns 16,250 of the 20,000 outstanding shares
Of stock
of First National Bank in Tarpon Springs, Tarpon Springs,
-orida, and 3,200
of the 5,000 outstanding shares of stock of Central
aldwin Bank, Robertsdale, Alabama; that Carlen Realty Company plans
to
distribute to its stockholders all or substantially all of the stock
ofIch it owns of Central Baldwin Bank; and that after this distribution
tock is accomplished, Carlen Realty Company will not, directly or
.1
1rectly, own or control any stock of any other banking institutions,
manage or control any banking institution other than First National
ank in Tarpon Springs.

W

7

In view of these facts, the Board has determined that Carlen
Company, after it distributes all or substantially all of the
ek which it owns of Central Baldwin Bank, will not be engaged,
mar
neetlY or indirectly, as a business in holding the stock of, or
4.11ing or controlling banks, banking associations, savings banks
or '
rust companies within the meaning of section 2(c) of the Banking
Act
'
de„,„„Of 1933; and, accordingly, Carlen Realty Company will not be
t6"ed to be a holding company affiliate for any purposes other
11;
4/1 those of section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act and will not
the
eci a v9ting permit from the Board of Governors in order to vote
stock of First National Bank of Tarpon Springs.
Rea1.4.

r




HOARD

Mr. A. L. Ellis

or

GOVERNORS

or

THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

-2-

If, however, the facts should at any time differ from
those set out above to an extent which would indicate that Carlen
Reaty Company might be deemed to be so engaged, this matter should
again be submitted to the Board. The Board reserves the right to
rescind this determination and make a further determination of this
matter on the basis of the then existing facts.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

1962

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 3
7/12/57

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 12, 1957

Mr. J. E. Denmark, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta,
Atlanta 3, Georgia.
Dear Mr. Denmark:
This refers to your letter of May 31, 1957, relating to
the holding company affiliate status of Carlen Realty Company, Tarpon
Springs, Florida.
There is enclosed for transmittal, a letter of this date
addressed to Mr. A. L. Ellis, President of Carlen Realty Company,
advising him of the action taken by the Board with respect to this
Matter. A copy of the letter is also enclosed for your files.
Mr. Ellis' letter of May 20, 1957, indicates that Carlen
Company intends to dispose of its stock in Central Baldwin
Bank
Diank by a distribution that would be entitled to the tax advantages
.Provided by sections 1101-1103 of the Internal Revenue Code, and it
i3 s noted that the Company wishes to expedite the proposed distribu.1. Presumably the Company is aware that the tax benefits are
vallable only if the Board makes the necessary certifications before
812,e distribution takes place. In any event, the Company's attention
wruld be directed to section 5(c) of Federal Reserve Regulation Y,
ich Provides that applications for tax certifications shall be filed
not
c less than 60 days in advance of the proposed distribution. The
should also be informed that certification as to "qualified
bank
:
114 holding corporation" status, under section 1103(b) of the Code,
the ascertainment of certain factual matters; and since this
'flay be
complex and time-consuming, the Company may wish to file its
:application
for tax certification with your Bank as soon as plans for
the d
istribution become definite.

Z

Very truly yours,
igned)

Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.
11-1e1oeures




1964
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No.

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

4

7/12,67

WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

Honorable Russell C. Harrington,
Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service,
12th and Constitution Avenue, N. W.,
Washington 25, D. C.
Nar Mr. Harrington:
Section 584 of the Internal Revenue Code exempts common
rust funds from Federal income taxation. The term "common trust
.tund" is defined to mean a fund maintained by a bank
(1) exclusively for the collective investment of funds held
by the bank in fiduciary capacities, and

(2) "in conformity with the rules and regulations, prevailing
from time to time, of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System pertaining to the collective
investment of trust funds by national banks."
After section 584 was enacted in 1936, the Board of Governors
con
suited the Bureau of Internal Revenue in 1937 before issuing rules
.1L2d regulations on this subject, which were (and still are) embodied
-" section 17 of Federal Reserve Regulation F (12 C.F.R. 206.17).
As you know, section 584 was enacted chiefly for the
Purn
Pose of eliminating a tax burden on collective investment of

aller trusts, resulting from the holding in Brooklyn Trust Company
Zilljg1
1.212.212..1111E (C.C.A. 2, 1936), 80 Fed. 2d 865, that collective

by "'orient of the funds of a number of individual trusts administered
taxa bank gives rise to an "association" that is subject to income
ation as a corporation.
In 1954 the Board of Governors was informed by a national
that
it
pens
desired to invest collectively funds of a number of
or Tlon and profit-sharing trusts administered by it. Section 10(c)
'egulation F then prohibited collective investment of trust funds
aexcePt as permitted in section 17." However, section 17 prescribes
TruZu2000 maximum on the investment of any one trust in a Common
Fund maintained in accordance with that section, and consegilentiv
or 4„. -.vestment in such a Common Trust Fund would not take care
'"4a situation, since it was desired to invest collectively funds




BOARD

OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Honorable Russell C. Harrington

196'5

-2-

Of individual pension trusts in amounts far in excess of the $100,000
Illaxinum. Also, it was not practical to comply with other detailed
requirements of section 17.
After consideration of the problem, the Board in 1955
allended section 10(c) of Regulation F so that it now not only permits
national banks to invest collectively in accordance with section 17,
but also provides that
"funds of a trust which forms part of a pension, profitsharing, or stock bonus plan of an employer for the
exclusive benefit of his employees or their beneficiaries
and which is exempt from Federal income taxes under the
Internal Revenue Code may be invested collectively with
funds of other such pension, profit-sharing, or stock bonus
Plan trusts if such collective investment is specifically
authorized by the instrument creating the trust or by court
order."
Copies of Regulation F, as amended, are enclosed.
After this proposed amendment to section 10(c) had been
Pklblicized bnt before its adoption, the Board learned that some banks
Ir;e4,garded it as constituting "rules and regulations . . . of the Board
Governors . . . pertaining to the collective investment of trust
14,11ds by national banks" within the purview of section 584. The Board
i:s under the impression that section 584 contemplated only collective
i,41estment of smaller trusts in accordance with relatively detailed
pe1ec and regulations. Since the proposed collective investment of
tv,nsion trusts did not fall within this category, the Board assumed
f2t such a collective fund would not constitute a "common trust
"d" within section 584. Accordingly, in order to avoid what the
thought might be a misunderstanding of the effect of the amendthe following footnote was added to section 10(c) of Regulation P:

4

-ection 584 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 provides
that a common trust fund maintained in conformity with rules
and regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve system 'pertaining to the collective investment of
trust funds by national banks' and meeting certain other
riequirements shall not be subject to Federal income taxation.
The rules and regulations of the Board of Governors for the
oses of section 584 are contained solely in section 17 of
regulation; and the permission contained in exception
(11) of section 10(c) is not intended to confer exemption from
Federal income taxation under section 584."

Pt7s




BOARD

OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

4110rable Russell C. Harrington

_3_

The Internal Revenue Service in 1955 ruled that when pension
were invested collectively, in specified circumstances, "the
,T7r°443 trust will . . . constitute a qualified trust under section 401(a)
the 1954 Code and will be exempt from tax under section 501(a) of
that
Code." Rev. Rul. 56-267, C.B. 1956-1, p. 206. Consequently, for
ane°me tax purposes the question of the applicability of section 584
IParently became immaterial, in such cases, However, it is understood
t at the applicability of section 584 to collective investment of pension
inirli,
sts Pursuant to section 10(c) of Regulation F is important in deterto1.4ng. whether certain transactions by such collective funds are subject
se the documentary stamp tax imposed by section 4301 of the Code, since
cPi°n 4303 exempts from that tax "the issue of shares or certificates
ab 4 common trust fund, as defined in section 584." Apparently the
"_quoted
footnote to section 10(c), particularly the last sentence
re°f, constitutes an impediment to a ruling by the Internal Revenue
ss;
sec ce that collective funds of pension trusts, as permitted by
-on 10(c), are "common trust funds" within the meaning of section
5a4"
ta,and therefore are within the exemption from documentary stamp
'es that is provided by section 4303.
tnasts

J

The Board of Governors is considering the deletion of the
hece -quoted footnote from Regulation F, since that footnote is not
,
8sary to the effectiveness of the Regulation from the point of
vie
rid- of the Board's supervisory responsibilities with respect to
ti:V-arY activities of national banks. However, the deletion of
adirl:&00tnote probably would be interpreted by banks and their tax
as indicating that collective funds of pension trusts that
NV with section 10(c) constitute "common trust funds" within the
Iew of section 584 of the Code. Accordingly, the Board would
app;
the "tate being informed whether there would be any objection on
134rt of the Internal Revenue Service to the proposed deletion.

above

Very truly yours,

S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.
Zneic
EtUres




BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

4
al

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
A*

Item No.
7/12/57

5

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE

44k

a

TO THE BOARD

'7,,A1 IMO ttri
44o***

July 12, 1957

Mr. H. F. Slade, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,
San Francisco 20, California.
Dear Mr. Slade:
This is in further reference to your letter of June 12,
1957, concerning whether purchases of securities by certain municiPal employees' retirement or pension systems on the basis of arrange:
1l ent5 for delayed delivery and payment, might properly be effected
OY a creditor subject to Regulation T in a special cash account
Wider section 4(c) of the regulation.
It appears that in a typical case the supervisors of the
retirement system meet only once or twice each month, at which times
aecisions are made to purchase any securities wished to be acquired
for.the system. Although the securities are available for prompt
,
ellvery by the broker-dealer firm selected to effect the system's
PI:Irchase, it is arranged in advance with the firm that the system
Will not accept delivery and pay for the securities before some
te more than seven business days after the date on which the
securities are purchased. Apparently, such an arrangement is
oc casioned_
by the monthly or semimonthly meetings of the system's
:
upervisors. It is indicated that a retirement system of this kind
aY he supervised by officials who administer it as an incidental
Partof their regular duties, and that meetings requiring joint
tpc.,'1°n by two or more supervisors may be necessary under the sys-w s rules and procedures to authorize issuance of checks in
Parent for the securities purchased. It is indicated also that
the
Purchases do not involve exempted securities, securities of
the kind
covered by section 4(c)(3) of the regulation, or any shipof securities as describbed in section 4(c)(4)
The regulation provides that a creditor subject thereto
not effect for a customer a purchase in a special cash account
i
l ter section 4(c) unless the use of the account meets the limitaca_a of section 4(a) and the purchase constitutes a "bona fide
ofn transaction,
' which complies with the eligibility requirements
be!
ecti°n 4(c)(1)(A). One such requirement is that the purchase
'
lade "in reliance upon an agreement accepted by the creditor

litay




BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Mr. H. F. glade

-2-

[broker-dealer] in good faith" that the customer will "promptly"
!flake full cash payment for the security, if funds sufficient fo
the purpose are not already in the account; and, subject to certain
exceptions, section 4(c)(2) provides that the creditor shall promptly
cancel or liquidate the transaction if payment is not made by the
Cus Wailer within seven business days after the date of purchase. As
indicated in the Board's interpretation at 1940 Federal Reserve
Bulletin 11724 a necessary part of the customer's undertaking pursua9t to section b(c)(1)(A) ia that he "should have the necessary means
01 payment readily available when he purchases a security in the
Pecial cash account. He should expect to pay for it immediately
?r in any event within the period (of not more than a very few days)
alat is as long as is usually required to carry through the ordinary
becurities transaction."
The arrangements for delayed delivery and payment in the
ease under consideration clearly would be inconsistent with the
!
*equirement of section 4(c)(1)(A) that the purchase be made in rethe upon an agreement accepted by the creditor in good faith that
e customer will "promptly" make full cash payment for the security.
i.ccordingly, the transactions would not qualify as a "bona fide cash
31,ransaction!'
and, therefore, could not properly be effected Tra
Peoial cash account, unless a contrary conclusion would be justified
the exception in section 4(c)(5) to which you referred.
Section 4(c)(5) provides that if the creditor, uacting in
°°d faith in accordance with" section 4(c)(1), purchases a security
for
cL customer '
,with the understanding that he is to deliver the
-11.:,urity promptly to the customer, and the full cash payment to be
Promptly by the customer is to be made against such delivery'',
the
;e
creditor may at his option treat the transaction as one to which
t e Period applicable under section 4(c)(2) is not the seven days
erein specified but 35 days after the date of such purchase.
It will be observed that the application of section 4(c)(5)
is s
pecifically conditioned on the creditor acting in good faith in
!ic_cordance with section 4(c)(1). As noted above, the existence of
'4! arrangements for delayed delivery and payment in the present
cos? would prevent this condition from being met, since the customer
4240
:
1 not be regarded as having agreed to make full cash payment
sr_olnptlyn. Furthermore, such arrangements clearly would be incon,Zt?nt with the requirement of section 4(c)(5) that the creditor
-4-lver the security promptly to the customer".




BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

*. H. F. Slade

Section 4(e)(5) was discussed in the Board's published
;
1:
141terpretation, referred to above, which states that "it is not
Purpose of section 4(c)(5) to allow additional time to custotrs., for making payment. The prompt delivery described in section
,(5) is delivery which is to be made as soon as the broker or
)
rir.
can reasonably make it in view of the mechanics of the securi:
files business and the bona fide usages of the trade. The provision
ee!ely recognizes the fact that in certain circumstances it is an
as uablished bona fide practice in the trade to obtain payment
ry
Cainct delivery
tact
the c-ecurity to the customer, and the further
to the customer's
1„.e. .that the mechanics of the trade, unrelated
adlness to pay, may sometimes delay such delivery to the customer."

'C

• reason for the
In this case it appears that the only
is
10 related solely to the customer's readiness to pay and
keen.° way attributable to the mechanics of the securities business.
exception in section
11 -nglY, it is the Board's view that the
the transactions in
permitting
k)) should not be regarded as
account.
cash
tion to be effected in a special

delay

4(4




Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

I

4

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

1
4010**,
Copr*po

r

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

)

Item No. 6
7/12/57

WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL. CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 12, 1957

tr
Russell G. Smith,
4xecutive Vice President,
1,3ank of America,
Wall Street,
Ileu York, New York.
DearlIr. Smith:
In accordance with the request contained in your letter
June 21, 1957, transmitted through the Federal Reserve Bank of
York, as supplemented by your letter of July 3, 1957, the Board
Governors grants its consent to your bank to purchase 9,500 shares
.()00 Francs par value each) of Societe Anonyme immobiliere du 28 Place
:?ndome for the Franc equivalent of approximtely A20,000. These
it is understood, represent the total outstanding capital stock
the company, which was organized under French law for the sole purVs, of acquiring the land and building located at 28 Place Vendome,
41
'
183 Fr- ce.

r

The Board's approval of the proposed purchase is given
vith the
understanding that (1) the activities of the building
I
,TanY
will be restricted to holding the property at 28 Place
ti7zome and (2) Bank of America will be expected to dispose of
pre stock of Societe Anonyme Immobiliere du 28 Place Vendome as
Alic4VtlY as practicable in the event that operations of Societe
Immobiliere du 28 Place Vendome should at any time be
Itee°flsistent with the provisions of Section 25(a) of the Federal
aerve Act or regulations thereunder.

Z

The Board understands that it is the desire of your bank
to el,
de ange the location of its present Paris Branch from 9 Boulevard
nadeleine to 28 Place Vendome as soon as the building can be
theled to meet the requirements of your Paris Branch. Accordingly,
oard of Governors approves the change in location of your Paris
atrh from its present address to 28 Place Vendome, with the under1.,0 ding that such removal will be accomplished within nine months
1/1 the
date of this letter.




BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

1,r. Russell G. Smith

- 2-

Please advise the Board of Governors in writing, through
the Pederal Reserve Bank of New York, when the branch is noved to
the new location anri cpened for business. It is understood, of
°urse, that the new location approved will not be changed without
:
6he prior approval of the Board of Governors.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
nerritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretnry.

J71

TELEGRAM
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 7
7/12/57

LEASED WIRE SERVICE

WASHINGTON

July 12, 1957

Mengels - San Francisco

Re your wire July 11. Board approves change of plans
t°14 new Salt Lake City Branch for installation of additional
Piling to permit construction of additional vault facilities
either in connection with original construction or at a later date.
It is understood that, before proceeding with the conatruction of the additional vault, the matter will be submitted
to the Board under the usual procedure.




(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
Carpenter.

1_973
Item No.

7/12/57
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE kEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C.

N THE MAIgER OF
THE APPLICATIONS OF
GENERAL CONTRACT CORPORATION
FOR DETERMINATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 4(c)(6) OF BANK HOLDING
COMPANY ACT OF 1956

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING OF
REPORT BY HEARING EXAMINER

Additional time having been requested by the Hearing
Examiner within which to file with the Secretary of the Board his
teport containing his recommended decision and it appearing to the
Board that such request should be granted, it is hereby ORDERED
that the time within which the Hearing Examiner may file such
recommended
decision be, and the same hereby is, extended to and
including
September 15, 1957.
This 12th

day of

July

, 1957.

By order of the Board of Governors.

(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

(SEAL)




8

1974

TELEGRAM
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 9

7/12/57

LEASED WIRE SERVICE

WASHINGTON
July 12, 1957
MITCHELL - ATLANTA
KEBJE
A. Hamilton National Associates, Inc., Chattanooga, Tennessee.
B. The
Calhoun National Bank, Calhoun, Georgia;
The First National Bank of Cartersville, Cartersville, Georgia;
The Commercial National Bank Cedartown, Georgia;
First National Bank in Harriman, Harriman, Tennessee;
The Hamilton National Bank of Johnson City, Johnson City, Tennessee;
The First National Bank of Lenoir City, Lenoir City, Tennessee;
The First National Bank of Loudon, Loudon, Tennessee;
The

Hamilton National Bank of Morristown, Morristown, Tennessee;

The First National Bank of Oneida, Oneida, Tennessee;
The First National Bank of Pikeville, Pikeville, Tennessee;
The First National Bank of South Pittsburg, South Pittsburg, Tennessee.
C.

nor to issuance of general voting permit, authorized herein,
applicant shall execute and deliver to you in duplicate an agreement
in form accompanying Board's letter S-964 (FRLS #7190).

(Signed)

Merritt Sherman

SHERMAN

Ittga
The Board authorizes the issuance of a general voting permit, under
the provisions of section 5144 of the Revised Statutes of the United
States, to the holding company affiliate named below after the letter
"A", entitling such organization to vote the stock which it owns or
controls of the bank(s) named below after the letter "B" at all
meetings of shareholders of such bank(s), subject to the



1975
-2-

condition(s) stated below after the letter "C". The period
within which a permit may be issued pursuant to this
authorization is limited to thirty days from the date of this
telegram unless an extension of time is granted by the Board.
Please proceed in accordance with the instructions contained
in the Board's letter of March 10, 1947, (S-96h).




1976
t,itt v•

r

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 10

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
c'6

".`

7/12/57

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

July 15, 1957.

he Honorable Wright Pathan,
11se of Representatives,
w
ashington 25, D. C.
ear M. Patman:
theThis letter is for the purpose of sending to you before
commencement of the hearings on the Financial Institutions Act
the3hi
answers as we could prepare, in the short time available, to
li ,questions attached to your letter of July 8, 1957. As you
tcl'-; realize, these answers, which are attached, of necessity had
h °e relatively brief and limited to the information readily at
4411.
If, after the hearings, it is your judgment that the
v, wra should be fully developed along the lines suggested in
;;;u:r questions, we shall endeavor to assemble such information as
to,Fan. However, that will take a considerable amount of time
wl here and at the Federal Reserve
Banks.
Sincerely yours,

Wm. McC. Martin, Jr.

trIciosure8




BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 11

7/12/57

WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADOWESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONOENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 12, 1957.

Dear sir:
to su,s
The Board's letter of February 15, 1957, asked the Reserve Banks
urits'lleY developments in financing by State and runicipal governmental
and the resulting information furnished has been helpful. A
Of 19necific check of municipal borrowing costs during the first quarter
is now being made. The Investment Bankers Association has supplied
°f all municipal bond issues of less than „250,000 that were sold
ast,g that quarter. For most of the issues listed, however, information
credit quality
and the cost of borrowing was not available.
80ard,

To assist in the check now being made of borrowing costs the
period
and
ereclit rc)uld
ascertain the borrowing cost
froni quai appreciate having Your Bank
ity for small bond issues in your district during the
°ItaineruarY through 14arch where such information has not already been
Your di', The attached tabulation lists all of the small bond issues in
cost a-sLrict during the three months in question, and the issues for which
Credit quality are available are indicated. Your assistance in
;ztylillzsinf0rmation for the other issues is desired. In cases where
are not made by nationally recognized rating authorities,
11-141. 1 .1e
/ able to obtain roughly comparable information on quality from
Sta '
;",a
, securities underwriters specializing in bonds of a particular
area, some
of which firms may have informal rating systems.
sqes. in Your
Examinations Department may also be helpful in rating
i%es

In order to minimize the reporting burden, a sample of the bond
rpreInt:i whieh cost and quality information is desired has been selected
or whif
st supplied by the Investment Bankers Association. Theindicated
issues
It is hoped you will be able to furnish information are
TrIclosed list by a check mark to the left of the name of the issuer.
'
o. ou be able readily to obtain information on other issues, that
rIal data
also would be helpful.
t()
It will
be appreciated if the requested information can be sent
Ile Board's
offices by July 31.

Tit
P'•

Inrz
7-NT

OF ALL
BANKS




Very truly
--,..... 116,
gift N32A 1.4.A A
C:1).A/\___AA,
_
,'-Merritt Sh6rman
Assistant SOH,5,4ry.

(
I

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

4n.4.346/ v,01„:,40

e

X

g•4 I

Item No. 12

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

;
41

&11

742/57

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

*

July 12, 1957

Mr. John A. Kley, Chairman,
Technical Committee on Mechanization
Of Check Handling,
Bank Management Commission,
American Bankers Association,
12 East 36th Street,
New York 16, New York.
Dear Mr. Kley:
The Board has been following with much interest the progress
being made by your Committee in developing an optimum system for
st
andardized mechanization of check processing. It is our understanding
that you are now considering the items of information regarding each
check that would be necessary in such a system, and the items to be
Prioted in magnetic ink on the face of the check.
In this connection, the Board willies to invite the attention
of Your Committee to the desirability of making provision in the new
check processing system for identification of type of depositor. By
incorporating into the system a simple standardized set of code numbers
Jaito the depositor, information such as is now reported on the
anntlal deposit ownership survey could be supplied at minimum cost and
inecnvenience to respondent banks.

Moreover, information needed to

"tietY needs of bank management and the public for data on deposit
"ti'ity by ownership group would be readily obtainable.




t

1_979

*. John A. Kloy, Chaiman

-2-

The Board has no specific coding to propose at this time.
Hover, if this suuestion meets with your approval members of our staff
41'0 availnble to assist your Committee in any way they can to develop
itchle coding system.




V3ry truly yours,

(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Shormn,
AcAtant Secretary.

a

1980

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
OTTO BREMER COMPANY
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA

Item No. 13
7/12/57

NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION h(c)(6) OF
BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1956 AND
ORDER FOR HEARING THEREON

Notice is hereby given that request has been made
to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
PlIrsilant to section h(c)(6) of the Bank Holding Company Act
Of 1956 212 U.S.C. 184j7 and section 5(b) of the Board's
Regulation Y 212 CFR 222.5(1317, by Otto Bremer Company, St. Paul,
Minnesota, a bank holding company, for a determination by said
Boa
rd that each of the companies listed below and the activities

ther__„
uol. are of the kind described in those provisions of the Act

and the regulati
on so as to make it unnecessary for the prohibitions
c)f section

4

of the Act with respect to retention of shares in

"nbenking organizations to apply in order to carry out the purposes

°f the Act:
1.
Citizens Agency, Inc.
2.
3. The
Saulpaugh Corporation
4. Western State Agency, Inc.
s. New England Insurance Agency
Drovers Exchange Agency &
6.
7. WiRealty, Inc.
lliston Realty Company
Willmar Investment Company
Inasmuch as section h(c)(6) of the Bank Holding Company
Act Of ,
4.956 requires that any determination pursuant thereto be made
bY thc,
- Board after due notice and hearing and on the basis of the

record

made at such
hearing,



IT IS HEREBY ORDERED That pursuant to section 4(c)(6) of

the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and in accordance with sections
5(b) and 7(a) of the Board's Regulation Y 25-.2 CFR 222.5(b), 222.7(a17,
Promulgated under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, a hearing with
respect to this matter be held commencing on August 20, 1957, at 10
°clock a.m., at the office of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,
73 South Fifth Street, in the City of Minneapolis, State of Minnesota,
before a hearing examiner selected by the Civil Service Commission
Pursuant to Sec. 11 of the Administrative Procedure Act, such hearing
to be conducted in accordance with Rules of Practice for Formal Hearings

°t the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

CFR Part 262.

The Board's Rules of Practice for Formal Hearings provide, in part, that
all such hearings shall be private and shall be attended only by
respondents and their representatives or counsel, representatives of thR
Board) witnesses, and other persons having an official interest in the
Proceedings; Provided, however, That on the written request of one or
more respondents or counsel for the Board, or on its own motion, the
1)(34rd, when not prohibited by law, may permit other persons to attend or
rnsY order the hearing to be public."
Any person desiring to give testimony in this proceeding
Should file with the Secretary of the Board, directly or through the
?ederal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, on or before August 9, 1957, a
written request relative thereto, said request to contain a statement
Of
the reasons for wishing to appear, the nature of the petitioner's




1982

interest in the proceeding, and a summary of the matters concerning
Which said petitioner wishes to give testimony. Such request will be
Presented to the designated hearing examiner for his determination in
the matter at the appropriate time. Persons submitting timely requests
• 411 be notified of the hearing examiner's decision in due course.
By order of the Board of Governors.

(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

July 12, 1957.