View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Was held in Washington on Saturday, July 10, 1943, at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Ransom, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
McKee

Mr. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Clayton, Assistant to the Chairman
Mr. Thurston, Special Assistant to the
Chairman
Mr. Goldenweiser, Director of the Division of Research and Statistics
Mr. Dreibelbis, General Attorney
Mr. Wyatt, General Counsel
Mr. Thomas, Assistant Director of the
Division of Research and Statistics
Messrs. Piser and Kennedy, Chief and
Assistant Chief, respectively, of
the Government Securities Section,
Division of Research and Statistics
There was presented a memorandum dated July 7, 1943, from Mr.
Go
ldenweiser recommending, for the reasons stated therein, that the Board
approve the following letter to the Presidents of all the Federal Reserve

"The Board has approved the proposal to make further
surveys of the ownership of demand deposits from such member
banks as agree voluntarily to provide this information. Results of the recent survey have been summarized in a statement prepared by the Board for public distribution. The
scope and nature of the proposed surveys are in accordance
With plans worked out by representatives of the Board, the
Federal Reserve Banks, and others as set forth in a report
of meetings of subcommittees on the subject dated June 2.
The plans are as follows:
(1) The next report should be obtained as of
the end of July -- a bank may report as of any
single day near the month-end or give weekly or
monthly averages as may best suit its convenience.




1032
7/10/43

-2"(2) A group of banks should be asked to report such information regularly on a semiannual
basis at the end of July and January. It is not
necessary that reporting banks be identical for
each date, although it is desirable that roughly
the same group or an expanding group report.
While the sample of very large banks reporting
in the March 31 survey was excellent, any others
willing to report should be added and it is especially desirable to obtain reports from more
banks with demand deposits of individuals, partnerships, and corporations of less than
50,000,000 each.
(3) The form of the report should be the
same for all banks with respect to classification of accounts, or if any variation is
adopted by a Reserve Bank, it should obtain at
least the information called for on the proposed
form. Classification of accounts will be only
slightly different from that used in the previous
survey: manufacturing ahd mining concerns are to
be shown in two groups covering (a) metals and
products and (b) all other products; construction
is to be included in all other nonfinancial businesses; and some relatively unimportant subgroups
under financial businesses are eliminated.
(4) It is desirable for purposes of estimating the distribution of all deposits that reporting
banks classify all accounts down to $10,000, but
in order to avoid placing too heavy, a burden on
large banks some variation from this limit may be
permitted:
Banks having over $500,000,000 of
demand deposits of individuals, partnerships, and corporations should be requested to classify accounts down to at
least $100,000.
Banks with such deposits of between
$100,000,000 and $500,000,000 should classify accounts down to at least $25,000.
All other banks should classify deposits down to at least $10,000.
All banks classifying accounts under $100,000
should give separate data for accounts of over
$100,000 and for those of between the minimum used
and $100,000. Experience with the first survey
shows that such segregation is essential for purposes of analysis and interpretation and adds virtually nothing to the work involved in reporting
the data.




7/10/43

-3-

"(5) A special survey should be made at
this time as to the ownership of deposits at
a group of smaller banks which need not be
requested to report regularly. Surveys of
these banks will be requested at less fre—
quent intervals than those of the larger
banks. This survey should have the follow—
ing special features:
The survey should cover mostly
banks with demand deposits of less
than $51000,000 each.
Reports should be obtained from
enough member banks to make up a sam—
ple of between 5 and 10 per cent of
all member and nonmember banks in that
size group in each district. The sample should be selected so as to be rep—
resentative of various localities and
various economic characteristics of the
district.
These banks should be asked to
classify all demand accounts of indi—
viduals, partnerships, and corporations
of over $3,000 each.
The classification of depositors
will differ slightly from that used for
the other group of banks, in that no de—
tail on financial businesses and less de—
tail on nonfinancial businesses will be
asked and that farmers' accounts will be
separated from other nersonal accounts
in so far as is feasible.
"Because of the omission of data requested in the previous
survey regarding size breakdown of small deposits and also of
information for previous dates, future regular surveys should
Involve much less work on the part of reporting banks than the
Previous one. It is hoped also that you will be able to in—
form the banks well enough in advance so that they may be pre—
pared to provide the information promptly. With the knowledge
that future reports of some sort will be requested, banks will
be in a position to keep their records so as to provide the in—
formation with greater ease.
"Copies of proposed forms to be used and of instructions to
accompany them are attached. It is expected that each Reserve
Bank All prepare its own report forms and instructions, con—
forming to those attached except where special district prac—
tices require changes. Uniform practice is desirable because
of the necessity for obtaining uniform results. It has been
suggested that, if feasible, the classification instructions




1.034
7/10/43
"be printed on the back of the report form in order to facilitate easy reference; if there is additional space, the other
instructions might also be included there. It is expected,
however, that each Reserve Bank will want to prepare its own
letter of transmittal to any banks which are not again personally visited in connection with the survey.
"Member banks will generally be interested in the results
of the past survey and, if you wish, sufficient copies of the
Board's recent published statement will be supplied to you for
distribution in your district. If you prefer to prepare your
own statement, you may find useful the Board's published statement and also the confidential memorandum discussing the significance of the figures prepared for internal distribution.
You may also wish to mention that the Board of Trustees of the
Banking Research Fund of the Association of Reserve City
Bankers has expressed great interest in the results and the
view that the study should be given cordial endorsement and
support and have also indicated a willingness to recommend to
individual members of their Association that they cooperate in
the survey.
"Consideration has been given to a proposal that a standard system of classification be recommended to banks for classifying their deposit accounts. Since such a classification,
however, should be of relatively permanent nature and will be
useful also for other purposes, more careful consideration of
the subject and consultation with others interested in it are
desirable before recommending any uniform code. Steps are being taken to cooperate with representatives of commercial banks,
banking supervisory agencies, the National Bureau of Economic
Research and other appropriate groups in working out such a code
and recommending its adoption. To avoid possible confusion in
case a different system is later recommended, no mention of the
standard code should be made in material submitted to the banks
at the time of the next survey, although it is expected that
the classifications used on the proposed forms will fit into any
standard code likely to be adopted later. Reporting banks might
find it useful to code their accounts with an appropriate number
or symbol and may use for this purpose the numbers given on the
schedule used in the survey, which could later be easily converted to the standard code basis.
"For purposes of analysis of data it is necessary for the
Board's Research Division to have copies of individual returns.
It would be appreciated if you would send copies as soon as
Possible after you have received then from the reporting banks.
We should also like to have copies of any compilations or analyses that you may prepare of results obtained in your district.
Future correspondence on this subject may be addressed to
Loodlief Thomas, Assistant Director, Division of Research and
Statistics."




1035
7/10/43
Mr. McKee questioned whether it would not be better to make
the next survey as of September 30, and Mr. Goldenweiser stated that
the information would be extremely valuable in connection with the
September war loan drive and that the end of July was the latest date
as of which the survey could be made and the results be made available
in time for use in connection with the drive.
Mr. Thomas stated that it was proposed to have the deposit
surveys made as of the end of January and July of each year which would
avoid an additional burden on the banks at the time they were preparing
the December 31 and June 30 call reports.
At the conclusion of the discussion,
Mr. McKee moved that the letter to the
Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks be
approved as set forth above.
This motion was put by the chair and
carried unanimously.
Ur. Szymczak referred to the actions taken by the Board on
May 29 and
June 17, 1943, in agreeing to cooperate with the State DePartment in the preparation of the financial sections of an economic
handbook for use in connection with the Peace Conferences that would be
held following the war, and stated that consideration had been given to
several people who

might be considered for temporary employment by the

Heard to take charge of this work.

He also said that it was thought

that Mr. Upgren, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,
Would be the best selection from among those whose services might be available, that Mr. Upgren had indicated to Mr. Goldenweiser that he would be
1111/ing to undertake the task if agreeable to Mr. Peyton, President of




1036
-6-the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, and to the Board, and that it
was felt that before any further steps were taken the matter should be
considered by the Board.
There was unanimous agreement that, in
view of the important work that the heads of
the research departments at the Federal Reserve Banks were being called upon to do at
the present time, particularly in connection
with the regional research program, they
should not be called away from the Banks to
do special jobs such as the one under consideration which would require an absence
of perhaps a year.
Mr. Szymczak stated that the search for a satisfactory individ-

ual to have immediate charge of the work would be continued, and in
that connection there was a discussion of persons who might be considered.
Mr. Thurston referred to the Board's letter of June 18, 1943,
to the Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks transmitting copies of
the pamphlet prepared by the Office of War Information under the title
"Information Program on Economic Stabilization to Keep Down the Cost
c't Living" and asking that the Banks advise the number of copies which
theY desired to have for distribution in the respective Federal Reserve
districts.

Mr. Thurston stated that the appropriation for the Office of

War Information for the current fiscal year had been substantially reduced and that informal inquiry had been made by that Office whether
the Board would be willing to pay for printing the pamphlets to be
distributed through the Federal Reserve Banks.




The members of the Board present were
in unanimous agreement that, in the circumstances, the Board would not be justified in
assuming such an expense, and it was understood that Mr. Thurston would inform the

1037
7/10/43

-7Office of War Information by telephone
of the Board's conclusion.
At this point Messrs. Thurston, Goldenweiser, Dreibelbis,

WYatt, Thomas, Piser, and Kennedy withdrew from the meeting, and the
action stated with respect to each of the matters hereinafter referred
to was then
taken by the Board:
The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System held on July 9, 1943, were approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated July 7, 1943, from Mr. Morrill, recommending,
for the reasons stated in the memorandum, that William A. Kline, who
was granted a leave of absence for military duty on November 24, 1942,
and temporarily reinstated by the Board on January 23, 1943, following
Which he resumed active duty from March 2 until about April 17, 1943,
be reinstated again as printing clerk in the Correspondence and Pub—
lications Section of the Secretary's Office for a period of not to exceed
90 days,

with basic salary at the rate of $2,600 per annum, and that he

l'asume his regular status in the Federal Reserve retirement system dur—
ing the period of his temporary employment without being required to
take the usual physical examination.
Approved unanimously, effective as
of the date upon which Mr. Kline reports
for duty.
Memorandum dated July 7, 1943, from Mr. Goldenweiser, Director.
°I* the Division of Research and Statistics, submitting the resignation
Harvey S. Perloff as an Associate Economist on a temporary basis in
that Division, to become effective as of the close of business on




1038
7/10/43

'1y 22, 1943, and recommending that the resignation be accepted as of
that date.
The resignation was accepted.
Letter to the Civil Service Commission, reading as follows:
"As you know, employees of the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System and of the Federal Reserve Banks
are included in the Retirement System of the Federal Reserve
Banks which was established March 1, 1994. Consideration is
now being given to making available to employees of the Board
of Governors an alternative retirement plan which would provide benefits more nearly equivalent to those provided under
the Civil Service Retirement System. The alternative plan
would, however, be an integral part of the Retirement System
of the Federal Reserve Banks and would operate within its
framework. Present employees of the Board of Governors who
are members of the Retirement System of the Federal Reserve
Banks would be given the option of remaining subject to the
normal provisions of the System or of accepting the provisions of the new plan.
"One of the provisions of the new plan would require
that all new employees of the Board of Governors, i.e., all
those entering the Board's employ after the effective date
of the plan, be members of the Retirement System of the Federal Reserve Banks and, unless they are already members of
the Retirement System by reason of previous service with the
Board or a Federal Reserve Bank, participants in the new plan.
This provision would affect not only new employees of the
Board who have had no previous Government service but also
new employees who prior to their connection with the Board
have been members of the Civil Service Retirement System.
Upon entering the Board's employ it would be necessary for
them to discontinue membership in the Civil Service Retirement System and become members of the Federal Reserve Retirement System.
"The above proposal was discussed informally some months
ago between representatives of the Commission and of the
Board, and as a result it is our understanding that such a
Provision of the new plan would be in no way inconsistent with
the provisions of the law relating to the Civil Service Retirement System. However, before the new plan is put into effect,
the Board will be pleased to have a confirmation from you that
there is no objection to the provision regarding new employees
as above indicated."




Approved unanimously.

1039
7/10/43
Telegram to Mr. Olson, Assistant Vice President of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago, reading as follows:
"Re tel July 9. Board agrees with your view that under
Regulation 0 member bank would be precluded from participating
in Regulation V loan in excess of $2,500 to be made to a
Partnership in which one of its executive officers has a majority interest."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. F. J. Bailey, Assistant Director of Legislative
Reference, Bureau
of the Budget, reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of July 2, 1943, addressed
to Chairman Eccles, enclosing a copy of the Navy Department's
Proposed report to Honorable Carl T. Durham of the House Committee on Military Affairs with respect to H.R. 3022, and requesting an expression of views with respect thereto.
"It is our understanding that it is the objective of
H.R. 3022 to provide funds to contractors and subcontractors,
by the methods set forth in the bill, in connection with the
termination of war contracts and in amounts not exceeding the
amounts owing under such terminated contracts, but that it is
not the purpose of the bill to provide methods of financing
the normal peacetime needs of business and industry. In this
connection the proposed letter from the Navy Department indicates that contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers would
be enabled, following the termination of their contracts, to
secure sufficient funds 'within the amounts owing under their
contracts to permit them speedily to convert to other operations'.
"Under the procedure which is used in connection with
operations under Executive Order 9112 of March 26, 1942 and
Regulation V of the Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve
Banks are utilized as fiscal agents of the United States in
effecting guarantees and loans on behalf of the War Department, Navy Department, and Maritime Commission. It is understood that a similar procedure is contemplated in effecting
the guarantees and loans which would be authorized by the
bill. It is believed desirable that this contemplated procedure be expressly reflected in the bill. This might be
accomplished by the addition of a provision reading substantially as follows: 'Any Federal Reserve Bank is authorized,
subject to such regulations as may be prescribed by the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, to act as




1040
-10—

7/10/43

"'fiscal agent of the United States for the purposes of this
Act.' It is felt that a suggestion to this effect should be
included in making any report to Congress with respect to
this bill.
"It is the view of the Board of Governors that a bill of
this kind would be helpful in meeting the problems of war contractors and subcontractors arising out of the termination of
their contracts and, subject to the qualifications above indicated, the Board of Governors sees no objection to the
transmission of the proposed letter from the Navy Department
to Representative Durham. The enclosure with your letter is
returned herewith."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. J. R. McCravey, Chairman of the Board of the Bank
of

Forest, Forest, Mississippi, reading as follows:
"Your letter of June 2nd has been read with interest by
the members of the Board. Two questions are involved.
"First, you refer to the desirability of forcing all
banks to clear at Dar all checks drawn upon them. The Board
favors nationwide par clearance. The existing Federal statutes, however, require only that no exchange charges be made
on checks presented for payment by a Federal Reserve Bank.
The statutes permit member and nonmember clearing banks to
make charges on all other checks not 'to exceed ten cents
per $100 or fraction thereof, based on the total of checks
and drafts presented at any one time', and other banks are
not subject to any Federal law on this subject at all. Hence,
in the absence of legislation, the last mentioned banks may
impose such charges as they deem advisable. In this connection you may be interested to know that the State of Iowa has
recently enacted a law requiring banks organized under the
laws of that State to clear at par checks drawn upon them.
In the circumstances, therefore, you will see that, however
much the Board may favor nationwide Dar clearance, the final
determination of the question is one for appropriate legislative bodies.
"Your second question is best stated by quoting from your
letter as follows:
'Our City correspondents have organized from
coast to coast and gotten out what they are pleased
to call a schedule that runs something like this:
they allow the country banker 1-1/2% on his daily
balance, this is prohibited by law, and then they
have a list of service charges covering every entry made on our account with them, if the interest




104i
7/10/43

-11-

"'on our balance is more than the service charges
they do not credit us with the overage, but if
service charges are more than the interest they
debit us with the difference.'
'Toil mention, in this connection, the prohibition against
the payment of interest upon demand deposits. This prohibition
applies to all member banks of the Federal Reserve System and
to all banks insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Regulations implementing the statutes have been issued
by the Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and
both regulations define the term 'interest' in the following
language:
'Within this regulation, any payment to or for
the account of any depositor as compensation for the
use of funds constituting a deposit shall be considered interest.'
"The effect of inserting this language in the regulations
was merely to declare existing law and to restate a principle
already established as a matter of general law. This was
jointly announced when the language became a part of both regulations. Nevertheless, wide differences of opinion seem to
exist among bankers and officials as to whether some of the
Practices engaged in by some banks fall within the general
Principle restated in the regulations. Because the matter is
thus governed by general law rather than special rules issued
under rule-making authority, the Board would be interested,
if by chance you have consulted your attorney, to know his
Opinion as to whether the practice you describe would be held
to be the payment of interest under the general law of Mississippi. Likewise, it would be helpful to the Board, in its
continuing study of this and related questions, to have copies
Of any of the 'schedules' which may have come to your attention and which can be readily furnished."
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated July 8, 1943, from Mr. Morrill, submitting
an

expense voucher prepared by Mr. Wingfield, Assistant General Attorney,

in the amount of $407, for reimbursement of expenses (including per diem
in lieu of subsistence for the neriod June 1 to July 1, 1943, inclusive,
'and actual necessary expenses of $159 in excess of the per diem allowance)
illeurred by him while his services were loaned to the Federal Reserve




1042
7/10/43

-12-

of Dallas, and recommending that the payment of the voucher be
aPproved.
Approved unanimously.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

a

Secretary.

APp




Chairman.