View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

CCI OD i•my

J(T3

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Thursday, July 1, 1954.
PRESENT:

Mr. Vardaman, Acting Chairman
Mr. Mills
Mr. Robertson
Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary

Memoranda from appropriate individuals concerned recommending personnel actions as follows:
APpointment, effective upon the
date of assuming duties
Name and title
Rebie A. Windsor,
Elevator Operator

Division

Type of appointment

Administrative
Services

Basic annual salary

Temporary
(six months)

*2,560

§.1.11Ery increases, effective July 4, 1954
Name and title

Division
Office of the Secretam

Rannah W. Nielsen,
File Clerk

Basic annual salary
To
From

$3,190

$3,270

4,830

4,955

3,030

3,110

7,240

7,440

International Finance
Margaret R.
Garber,
Statistical Assistant
Examinations
Jean Callovini,
Stenographer
J. F. Clark,
Federal_ Reserve Examiner




7/1/54

-2-

§..1-2.12y increases, effective July

4
)1954, (continued)

Name and title

Division

Basic annual salary
From
To

Administrative Services
Ruth M. Flowers,
Charwoman
William H. Gardner,
Chauffeur
William Hyde,
Sergeant
Oda R. Johnson,
Clerk-Stenographer
Hiram J. Roush,
Guard
Howard W. Stull,
Chauffeur

2,420

$2,490

3,230

3,310

3,600

3,680

3,415

3,495

2,990

3,070

3,310

3,390

.§..L122.17_211322ment incident to intra-divisional transfer
Thomas G. Cook, Division of Administrative Services. Adjustment
la basic annual salary from 53,454 to $3,310, effective July 1, 1954,
incident to his intra-divisional transfer from the position of Assistant
Foreman of Laborers to the position of Guard, effective the same date.
Leavs without pay
Shirley S. Corbin, Elevator Operator, Division of Administrative
Services. From June 15, 1954, through December 31, 1954.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated June 24, 1954, from the Division of 1- ersonne1
Administration recommending that Gardner L. Boothe, II, Administrator,
Office of Defense Loans, be granted an advance of 26 days' sick leave
beginning July 2, 1954, in accordance with the Board's Leave Regulations; that upon the expiration of the advanced sick leave on
August 10, Mr. Boothe be placed on annual leave until the end of
August; and that consideration be given at that time to whether he




989
7/1/54

-3-

should make application for disability retirement or should continue
to be carried on annual leave.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Wiltse, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank
Of New York, reading as follows:
In accordance with the request contained in your
letter of June 23, 1954, the Board of Governors approves
the designation of the following as special assistant
examiners for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York:
David H. Hopton
Henry 0. Robinson
Theodore J. T. Short
Walter R. Welliver
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Armistead, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank
of Richmond, reading as follows:
This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of
June 23, 1954, requesting that the Board of Governors
approve the designation of Truett Evans Allen as a
Special assistant examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank
Of Richmond.
It is noted that Mr. Allen is indebted to the Bank
of Commerce and Trusts, Richmond, Virginia, (a State
member bank) in the amount of $200, which is being curtailed by monthly instalments and will be paid in full
by February 1, 1955.
The Board approves the designation of Truett Evans
Allen as a special assistant examiner for the Federal
Reserve Bank of Richmond with the understanding that he
will not participate in any examination of the Bank of
Commerce and Trusts, Richmond, Virginia, until his indebtedness to the bank has been liquidated or otherwise
eliminated.




Approved unanimously.

990
_14._

7/1/54

Letter to Mr. Earhart, President, Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco, reading as follows:
Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of June 25,
1954, advising that the Board of Directors of your Bank
has concluded that the Bank should assume its own risks
of loss from fire and allied causes, and consequently
voted to discontinue purchased insurance coverage against
such risks.
You advise that it is the intention to have such change
become effective at the end of the year, the termination
date of the existing policies.
The Board of Governors has no objection to the discontinuance of the Purchase of insurance covering fire and
allied risks, in accordance with the action taken by the
Board of Directors of your Bank.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Walter Kennedy, President, Alabama Bankers Association, 1004 First National Bank Building, Montgomery, AlabqmP, reading
as follows:
In your letter of June 231 1954, you state that the
reduction in reserve requirements of member banks authorized
by the Board of Governors on June 211 1954 is not uniform as
between central reserve city banks, reserve city banks, and
country banks, and you inquire as to the reasons for the
different amounts of the reduction as well as the reasons
for differences in effective dates.
A copy of the Board's statement for the press regarding
this action is enclosed. You will note that the reduction
on time deposits was one percentage point at all member banks.
This reduction was effective at country banks on June 161
the beginning of the semi-monthly reserve computation period
for such banks; while it was effective at central reserve and
reserve city banks on June 24, the beginning of the weekly reserve computation period for such banks.
With respect to net demand deposits, the amount of the
reduction in terms of percentage points of reserve requirements was the same--one percentage point--at reserve city banks
and at country banks, and the effective dates were the beginning




991
7/1/54

-5-

of the respective reserve computation periods beginning
nearest the end of July. An additional reduction of one
percentage point was authorized for central reserve city
banks effective June 24. It is assumed that it is this
additional percentage point reduction and its earlier effective date that prompts your letter, since otherwise the
reductions were the same in terms of percentage points for
the various classes of banks, and the effective dates were
those nearest the beginning of the reserve computation
periods for the respective banks affected.
As you are aware, the law requires that banks be
classed according to whether they are in "central reserve
city", "reserve city", or "other" locations. The law also
provides for basic differentials in the reserve requirements
of the three classes of cities, relatively larger reserves
being specified for banks in central reserve and reserve
cities. In adjusting reserve requirements, the Board considers the effects of various amounts of change in terms of
the quantity of reserves to be released, as well as the
relative position of banks in the various groups of cities
into which they are classed according to the law. In addition, some weight mustbe given to the relative equities inthat
volved and to the proportionate changes in requirements
detime
on
point
will result. For example, one percentage
is at
posits is proportionately much more where the level
deposits
demand
6 per cent than one percentage point on net
y,
where the level is at 13 or 19 or 22 per cent. Similarl
the
level
where
one percentage point on net demand deposits
is 13 per cent is substantially more proportionately than
reone percentage point on net demand deposits where the
actual
the
quirement is 22 per cent. As an illustration,
required
reduction in the aggregate dollar amount of reserves
banks
under
country
against net demand and time deposits of
the
while
cent,
the reduction announced June 21 is 9.6 per
of
reserves
amount
actual reduction in the aggregate dollar
at central rerequired against net demand and time deposits
serve city banks is 9.4 per cent.
the Board must
In arriving at any decision of this sort
on the basis
decision
weigh the various factors and make its
and credit
monetary
of
of what seems most appropriate in terms
also
must
attempt
policy as well as in terms of equity. It
to make the effective dates of changes coincide to the extent
practicable with the times when more or less reserves are
likely to be appropriate in terms of pressures in the money
market or demand for credit at banks located away from the
Principal money markets.




992
7/1/54

-6-

It is hoped that this letter will provide at least a
partial answer to the questions raised by your inquiry.
Perhaps it should be added that there is no precise mathematical way of determining the most suitable level of reserve requirements within the limits permitted by existing
law, and a measure of judgment must be used by the Board
in determining what changes seem appropriate at any given
time. Should you wish to discuss this general question
further, please feel free to talk with Mr. Bryan, President
of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, to whom a copy of
your letter as well as of this response is being mailed.




Approved unanimously.