View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

134
A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
8Yetea was
held in Washington on Wednesday, January 30, 1946, at
2:15 P.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Ransom, Vice Chairman
Szywczak
McKee
Draper
Evans

Mr. Hammond, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Connell, General Assistant,
Office of the Secretary
Mr. Morrill, Special Adviser
Mr. Thurston, Assistant to the Chairman
The action stated with respect to each of the matters hereiluLtUr referred to was taken by the Board:
The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Governors of the
!ecleral

Reserve System held on January 29, 1946, were approved unani-

racitie4.

Memorandum dated January 25, 1946, from Mr. Bethea, Director
Of the Di 50
of Administrative Services, recommending that Miss
PlcY Anone
Read be appointed as a stenographer in that Division on
tern
P°rarY basis for an indefinite period, with salary at the rate
cif 42,100 per
annum, effective as of the date upon which she enters
111)°11 the performance of her duties after having passed the usual
151;Ir8
ie41 examination and subject to a satisfactory check of her refThe memorandum stated that Miss Read was a member of the
Service Retirement System, and it was contemplated that she
continue as
a member of that System.




Approved unanimously.

135

1/30/46

-2Memorandum dated January 24, 1946, from Mr. Paulger, Direc-

tor of the Division of Examinations, recommending that the salary
of Charles H. Bartz,
an Assistant Federal Reserve Examiner, be increased from
$3,970 to $4,080 per annum, and that his title be
chanvsA
,A to Federal Reserve Examiner, both effective February 10,
1946.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated January 29, 1946, from Mr. Thomas, Director
°f the

Division of Research and Statistics, submitting the resignati0
11 of M. Ruth F. Gould, a clerk in that Division, and recommendthat the resignation be accepted effective as of the close of
bl/stness February 15, 1946, and that a lump sum payment be made for
the m.—
'nual leave remnining to her credit at that time.
The resignation was accepted as
recommended.
Memorandum dated January 29, 1946, from Mr. Bethea, Director
°t the D

ion of Administrative Services, submitting the resigna-

ti°11Mrs. Rae M. Brooks, a telephone operator in that Division,
and recommending
that the resignation be accepted effective as of

the close of business February 8, 1946, and that a lump sum payment,
be made
time

for any accrued annual leave remaining to her credit at that

The resignation was accepted as
recommeaded.




1_36
1/30/46

-3Letter to Mr. Peyton, President of the Federal Reserve Bank

clf Minneapolis,
reading as follows:
"The Board of Governors approves the reappointments of Messrs. S. V. Wood, John M. Bush, C. 0. Follett,
and A. L. Miller as members of the Industrial Advisory
Committee for the Ninth Federal Reserve District to serve
for terms of one year each, beginning March 1, 1946, in
accordance
with the action taken by the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, as rePorted in your letter of January 21, 1946."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Sheehan, Chief Examiner of the Federal Reserve
Bar*

of New York, reading as follows:

"Reference is made to your letter of January 22,
,
19462 submitting for the consideration of the Board of
Governors the proposal of the Bank of Passaic and Trust
!
4 1/1Pany, Passaic, New Jersey, to increase its investment
441 bank premises to approximately $305,000 through expenditure of about $237,000 for the purpose of acquiring,
!
xPanding and improving the property now occupied by the
head office of the institution.
"In view of your recommendation, the Board will interpose no objection to the additional investment as proPosed, provided the actual investment is kept as close
s may be practicable to the estimate submitted and shall
not, in any
event, bring the total of the trust company's
investment in banking premises to an amount in excess of
its capital."
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. Volberg, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
Bank of
San Francisco, reading as follows:
Relet January 22. In view of your recommendation
maard approves establishment and operation of a branch in
Pay California by American Trust Company, San Francisco,
2

Bo




137
1/30/46

-4-

"California, in connection with proposed purchase of assets and assumption of deposit liabilities of Napa Bank
of Commerce, with the understanding that counsel for Reserve Bank will review and satisfy himself as to the legality of all steps taken to effect the absorption and
establish
the branch."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Strothman, Assistant Counsel of the Federal Reerve Bank of
Minneapolis, reading as follows:
"In your letter of January 24, 1946, you refer to
the following
sentence in the Board's announcement of 100
Per cent margin requirements:
'Rules incorporated in both regulations in
July of 1945 will now require that whenever
securities held as collateral are sold, the
proceeds must be used to reduce or retire the
customer's indebtedness.'
thai. "You then ask about a case in which it is understood
.a loan subject to section 1 of Regulation U has bond
?°11ateral with 'maximum loan value ... as determined by
1.Ilr bank
in good faith' at least equal to the amount of
the lo
addition, the loan is secured by certain
steo:sa.n.
"It is understood that you wish to know whether proceeds of the sale of collateral must be applied toward reducing the loan. It is understood further that you wish
;
(11 know whether the answer would be the same if the sale
as of bonds rather than of stocks.
"Section 1 does not prohibit transactions if the
aximum loan value equals or exceeds the amount of the
after the transaction is completed. This was intended
to
eZabe implied in the Board's announcement, although the
I,
Point is covered only in the text of the Regulation
etself

T

4, "With respect to the second part of your question,
answer would be the same whether the collateral sold
71.8 stocks or bonds.
In other words, until the total maxloan value, appropriately computed, equals or exceeds
n? amount of the loan, the proceeds of the sale of any
collateral must be applied to reduce the loan."




Approved unanimously.

138

1/30/46

—5Letter to Mr. J. P. Yoder, Vice President and Secretary of the

004sumer Banking Institute, Washington, D. C., reading as follows:
"This refers to your letter of January 18 in which
You ask for comments on the application of RegulationW
to two cases
reported by Mr. Harry B. Weaver, President
of The Davenport Morris Plan Company, Davenport, Iowa,
in his letter to you dated January 16.
"Each of these two examples, as stated by Mr. Weaver,
turns upon the provisions of the regulation dealing with
extensions of
credit to be used to make a down payment on
a listed article. Mr. Weaver is correct in his understanding that such an extension of credit is prohibited by the
regulation. This restriction is established in section
11(b) and (c), in combination with other pertinent provisions of the regulation.
"If we rightly understand his letter, Mr. Weaver does
not, question
the need for continuation of Regulation W as
a part of the Government's anti-inflation program. In his
words, he is more concerned with 'the need for special proto grant "relief" to the many who now require as61stance in the post-war period.' In this connection his
examples of the effect of Regulation W refer to a returned
serviceman and to a man who had been unemployed for two
1?nths as a result of 'reconversion.' It is clear that
the
provisions of the regulation were not the primary cause
°,'
1 the difficulties of these two individuals to which Ur.
r
vreaver refers, since these difficulties were really the
esult of the war and its after effects.
"The basic problem in these cases, if they may be
.viewed as
typical, is the problem of readjustment from a
a
peacetime
economy. RegulationW is designed to
helpt°
all individuals, including veterans and the unemployed,
a° make this readjustment by doing its part in holding back
" inflation which would add seriously to the readjustment
Problems.
"It is very doubtful whether it would be possible to
ax the provisions for the benefit of veterans without
itrpardizing whatever restraint the regulation has on ina ati°n in general. Veterans and their families will form
a verY large part of the population. Almost everyone has
:
:
viceman among his relatives and the serviceman could
ID re
:
rn.
(
1 11
liqegrIs
1reterans. In consequence, any concession for
d go a long way, possibly all the way, in

T




139

1/30/46

-6

I!
nullifying the regulation. Feeling as we do that inflation presents a serious danger to all of us, and particularly
to the
veterans and former war workers who must depend upon
peacetime pay, we cannot believe that it would be well to
break down even a part of the program which is just barely
holding back
the tide of price rises. Vie think that all in
all
:
, the regulation, together with the other measures, will
bring. about a fairer distribution of the limited supply
flows
vailable at prices the veterans can afford.
"We have been much concerned about the problems of
the Veterans,gwho
are inevitably finding difficulties in
themselves in civilian life and in creating
homes
Fundamentally, the solution to the veterans' difficulties, and to those of other people needing to be re!
stablished, can only come with large-scale production.
;in the meantime, veterans have as much interest as, permore than, the general public in the program to hold
back inflationary price rises. Furthermore, they will
suffer serious losses if they are encouraged by liberal
redlt terms to load up with wartime merchandise and saddle
themselves with debts they cannot repay. Our conclusion
so far has
been that veterans as a group would be hurt
rather than helped by a special concession under Regulation
'We are glad to have this opportunity of expressing
our views."




hin

Approved unanimously.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Assistant Secretary.

Chairman.