View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

162

A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Systelil Was held in Washington on Saturday, January 30, 1943, at 11:00 a.m.
PRESENT: Mr. Szymczak
Mr. Draper
Mr. Evans
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Morrill, Secretary
Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Clayton, Assistant to the Chairman

The action stated with respect to each of the matters hereinter referred
to was taken by the Board:
Telegram to Mr. Hitt, First Vice President of the Federal Reserve
Bank

of St. Louis, reading as follows:
"Retel Board approves designation of Arthur M. Markham,
as special assistant examiner."
Approved unanimously.

Letter to the board of directors of the "First State Bank of
Gra
Yslake", Grayslake, Illinois, stating that, subject to conditions of
illeniber'ship numbered 1 to 3 contained in the Board's Regulation H, the
11(3e4"4 aPproves the bank's application for membership in the Federal ReSe
e

System and for the appropriate amount of stock in the Federal Re-

Serve Bank

of Chicago.
Approved unanimously, together with a
letter to Mr. Young, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, reading as
follows:
"The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
aPproves the application of the 'First State Bank of Grayslake!, Grayslake, Illinois, for membership in the Federal




163
1/30/43

-2-

"Reserve System, subject to the conditions prescribed in
the enclosed letter which you
are requested to forward to
the Board of Directors of the institution.
Two copies of
si.ich letter are also enclosed, one of which is for
your
files and the other of which you are requested to forward
to the Auditor of Public Account
s for the State of Illinois
for his information.
"Since the amount of estimated losses shown in the rePort of examination for membership is relatively small,
the
usual condition of membership requiring elimination of
losses has not been prescribed. It is assumed, however,
that Proper provision for losses will be made as a matter
Of sound banking practic
e.
"It has been noted that you have been assured that
steps will be taken to secure the collective judgment of
the
directorate or duly appointed committees of directors
in
the prior conside
ration of loans and investments."
Letter to Mr. Hays, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank
cif Cleveland,
reading as follows:
Me have read and considered with care your letter of
January 9, 1943, in which you discuss the proposal that instalment sales scheduled to pay out within a short period
such as forty days be exempt from the down-payment requirelasnts of Regulation W. This is a matter which, as you know,
has troubled us for some time for reasons which you have
mentioned in your letter. Our consideration of the problem
has led us to the tentative conclusion that, for the present
at least, we should not change
the regulation in the manner
that You suggest
. This does not preclude future action to
that effect, and
is based principally on the view that the
arguments for and against
such an amendment are rather
evenly balanced and that in these circumstances the presumption is in favor of retaining the status puo.
"You will be interested in some of the arguments that
have been made against the change. In the first place, the
exemption would result in the removal of a certain amount of
restraint.
How much would be difficult to say, but it is
certainly true
that some of the fields in which the present
requirement applies restrai
nt are fields in which merchants
s
cnnot
switch customers to true charge accounts without con..derable
b1, evendifficulty. Secondly, the exemption would tend to
more than it is blurred already, the distinction
instalment credit and charge-account credit. There
Is undoubtedly an
area where the two overlap, or seem to do
so, but our efforts hithert
o have been in the direction of
separating them rather than bringing them closer together,




164
1/30/43

-3-

Hang the reasons for continuing to do so seem on balance to
be at least a little better. In the third place, such an exemPtion would be a very distinct encouragement to 'no-downPayment advertising, which is a thing we should like to minimize as much as possible. Fourthly, there is a difficult
Problem in deciding just what provisions should be applicable
to short-term instalment credits of this kind if they are exempt from the down payment. Clearly it would not be possible
to apply all the other regular instalment provisions, since
mlany of these are predicated on considerably longer maturitles. If the short-term instalment accounts were not only
exempted from down payments but were treated in other respects in the same manner as charge accounts there would
Probably be operating and investigating difficulties.
"We appreciate your point that there is a real hand.capon the investigators when they are trying to make a
distinction between a charge sale and an instalment sale in
this field. It must be recognized that it would probably
be.difficult in many cases to prove to the satisfaction of
a Jury that the sale is of the one type or the other, but we
wonder if the evidence is not usually sufficient to make it
Possible for the investigator, by informal means, to get the
Registrant into line. In talking with several men at other
Federal Reserve Banks we have received the impression that
thls problem has been bothering them but that it has not
b?en so acute as they had at first supposed and that it is
nelding to persuasion. It cannot be denied that with the
best of enforcement there will continue to be some avoidance
through this channel, but we doubt that there will be so
much as to make a great deal of difference.
"You will understand that this letter is not intended
tO foreclose discussion, but only to indicate that we should
like to flay the matter on the tablet for the present."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. John B. Blandford, Jr., Administrator of the
National Housing Agency, reading as follows:
"This is in reply to your letter of January 29, 1943,
?oncerning a proposed change in the procedure for the desnation of remodeling and rehabilitation projects as 'defense housing for purposes of section 8(e) of the Board's
Regulation V.




165
1/30/43

-4-

"The Board is conscious of the fact that this is a matter of great difficulty and is appreciative of the efforts
You have made to overcome Some of the abuses that appear to
have developed under the old -procedure. The Board has considered the proposed change and has no objection to it.
.
"It is recognized that, in the final analysis, a decision as to whether or not a proposed repair is essential to
continued habitation is a matter of judgment which is being
left to be determined by a party in interest. On the other
!
,
1:
and, it is appreciated that there are serious practical
uilficulties in having every project approved by a GovernTent agency, such as the National Housing Agency, or one of
Its divisions. Under the circumstances, there seems to be
no alternative to a further trial of the 'creditor approval'
method. It is noted that copies of the completed forms,
after approval by the initial Registrant, will be sent to
the nearest office of the National Housing Agency. This
12rocedure will not only help to inject some caution into the
1.ieg1strant8
' practices, but also provide some means of judging whether or not the plan is operating reasonably well.
"As soon as the new order and form have been adopted,
we should like to have 15 copies so that we may send prompt
notice to the Federal Reserve Banks.
"It is assumed that you will distribute copies of the
new order and form widely so that notice of the change of
Procedure will be brought to the attention of contractors
and lending institutions. It has been found that the Federal Reserve Banks receive requests for information on this
subject from time to time, and we should like to have 3,000
c°Ples of the order and form as soon as they are available
SO that we
may send them to the Federal Reserve Banks."
Approved unanimously.

Of

Letter to Mr. Creighton, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank
Bo
ston, reading as follows:
"At the completion of the examination of the Federal Re2erve Bank of Boston, made as of December 1, 1942, by the
!doardls examiners, a copy of the report of examination was
for your information and that of the directors. A copy
was also furnished President Paddock.
Ca1i"The Board wishes your attention to be called specifto the examiners
' comments contained in pages 7-14.
iLone Board
feels that the matters therein referred to should
e given your continued careful consideration, and would




166
1/30/43

_5_

"like to be advised as soon as practicable of action taken
or to be taken by you and your board of directors on these
Very important matters."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Comptroller of the Currency, reading as follows:
"It is respectfully requested that you place an order
With the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, ,supplementing the
order of June 17, 1942, for printing Federal Reserve notes
of the 1934
Series in the amounts and denominations stated
for the following Eederal Reserve Banks:
Number of
Denomi—
Amount
sheets
nations
Boston
49,000,000
150,000
5's
36,000,000
150,000
20's
18,000,000
300,000
Philadelphia
5'8
Cleveland
15,000,000
250,000
5's
24,000,000
200,000
10's
Richmond
18,000,000
300,000
5's
36,000,000
150,000
20/s
Atlanta
36,000,000
300,000
10's
24,000,000
100,000
201s
Chicago
65,400,000
1,090,000
5's
38,400,000
6,400
500's
40,800,000
3,400
1,000's
12,000,000
200
5,000's
12,000,000
100
10,000's
St. Louis
9,540,000
159,000
5's
10,320,000
86,000
10's
9,840,000
41,000
20's
8,400,000
14,000
50's
6,000,000
Minneapolis
50,000
10's
12,000,000
50,000
20's
Kansas City
9,000,000
150,000
5's
12,000,000
100,000
10's
12,000,000
50,000
20's
3,000,000
500's
500
Dallas
4,800,000
80,000
5's
10,800,000
90,000
10'8
7,200,000
30,000
20's
3,600,000"
3,000
100's




Approved unanimously.




Thereupon the meeting adjourned.