View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

191
A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Was

held in Washington on Friday, January 24, 1936, at 5:30 p. m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Thomas, Vice Chairman (latter part of meeting)
Hamlin
Miller
Szymczak
O'Connor (first part of meeting)

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Morrill, Secretary
Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Clayton, Assistant to the Chairman
Thurston, Special Assistant to the Chairman
Wyatt, General Counsel

Chairman Eccles presented a recommendation submitted by the Chief
of the Board's Division of Security Loans that the Board
increase from
45% to 55%
the highest margin requirements prescribed in Regulation "T"
relating to
the extension and maintenance of credit by brokers, dealers,
and members of national securities
exchanges, for the following reasons:
The advance in stock prices, which began last March
and continued until the middle of November, has been regamed during recent weeks, and during the last few days stock
prices have risen to a new high level distinctly above that
reached last November, about even with the level of the
middle of 1931, and above the level of 1926. At the same
time the volume of trading has increased again to about
3,000,000 shares per day.
The volume of credit extended to customers by member
firms of the New York Stock Exchange who carry margin accounts,
Which began to increase about the middle of 1935, has increased
since that time by about t215,000,000, or approximately 20 percent. At the same time the borrowings of these firms at banks
have increased by about $150,000,000. Bank loans on securities
to borrowers other than brokers, after declining to last
September, have subsequently shown a slight increase.
There recently has been an increase in the amount of
brokers' borrowings at banks and of customers from brokers, and
these increases have lasted for several months and have continued until the present time. On the basis of past experience it
would seem that a further advance in securities prices would be




192
1/24/36

-2-

likely to be accompanied by a further growth in the use of
credit in the stock market.
While the amount of borrowing at this time is low as
compared with some past years and much of the trading at this
time is on a cash basis, the amount of borrowing is at about
the level from which the great increase that accompanied the
stock market boom commenced. The restraining influence of any
increase in margin requirements in order to be effective must
be applied before an unhealthy development of credit in the
stock market gets under way.
It was pointed out that the specific action recommended would
Change the figure of 55% in the present margin formula contained in Regulation "T" to 45%; that the principal effect would be to increase the
amount of margin required on about three-fifths of the active stocks
from 45% of their market value to 55%; that it tould raise the upper
limit of the "anti-pyramiding zone" from 182% of the lowest market price
to 222% of the lowest market price, thus restoring some stocks (representing about 15% of the trading) to that zone; and that margin requirements on securities which have risen by less than 82% of their official
lows would not be increased.
Reference was made to the continued existence of e large volume
Of excess reserves of member banks, amounting to over t3,000,000,000 at
the present time, and to the potential danger of credit expansion grold,ing out of the availability of these unused funds which may be drawn upon
in part to finance operations in the securities markets.

It was pointed

out that the Board had been entrusted with the specific power under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prevent the excessive use of credit
for the purchase or carrying of securities and that action that would
diminish the general supply of credit might result in a tendency to retard




193
1/24/56

-5-

recovery, which is as yet far from complete.

Chairman Eccles stated

that, in view of the situation as a whole, he felt that the action recommended should be taken by the Board immediately.
A discussion of the recommendation followed, during which it
aPPeared that the members of the Board were in agreement that, in view
of all the circumstances, the proposed action was desirable.
Mr. Tyclit called attention to the fact that, under section 7(a)
Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Board's regulation governing
the extension of credit by brokers, dealers and members of national
securities exchanges must be "for the purpose of preventing the excessive
use of credit" and that, under section 8(b), the Board is authorized
to Prescribe higher margin requirements than those set forth in section
7(a) of the Act only when the Board deems it "necessary or appropriate
to prevent the excessive use of credit to finance transactions in securities".

He stated that the purpose of section 7 was not to regulate the

Prices of securities or the volume of trading on the exchanges, but only

to prevent the excessive use of credit for the purchase or carrying of
securities;
that, before increasing margin requirements, the Board should
make a finding that such action is "necessary or appropriate to prevent
the excessive use of credit to finance transactions in securities"; and

that the record should contain a sufficient statement of facts to furnish
l'easonable support for such a finding.
Chairman Eccles referred to the increase of $215,000,000 in the
amount of credit extended to customers by member firms of the
Stock

New York

x
Exchangechange
who carry margin accounts, the increase of g150,000,000




194
1/24/36

-4-

in the borrowings of these firms from banks, and the fact that this
trend is continuing at the present time, and expressed the opinion that
the Board was amply justified in increzIsing margin requirements in
order to prevent such use of credit from becoming excessive.
Mr. Sgymczak raised the question when the proposed increase
Should be made effective.

Mr. Parry was called into the meeting and the

question was discussed. It was agreed that tlose affected by the increase in margin requirements would have ample notice if the increase
were made effective February 1 and an immediate announcement thereof
were made by the Board.
Mr. Sgymczak moved that, for the reasons set
forth above, the Board approve and adopt an amendment to Regulation "T" and supplement thereto as
set forth below, both to become effective February
1, 1936, as necessary and appropriate to prevent the
excessive use of credit to finance transactions in
securities:
"Amendment No. 7

of Regulation T - Effective February 1. 1936.

"Subsections (a), (b) and (c) of section 3 of Regulation
are hereby amended to read as follows:
"(a) General Rule. - No creditor shall make any
initial extension of credit to any customer on any
registered security (other than an exempted security)
for the purpose of purchasing or carrying any security,
in an amount thich causes the total credit extended on
such registered security to exceed the maximum loan
value of such registered security. Except as specifically
provided elsewhere in this regulation, the maximum loan
value of a registered security (other than an exempted
security) shall be the maximum loan value which the Board
Of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall prescribe
as of general application under this regulation from time
to time in supplements to this regulation, which will be
issued in advance of the date upon which such maximum loan
value becomes effective.




195
1/24/36

-5Extension of credit to other members, brokers
and dealers. "In a special account recorded separately, any creditor may
extend credit on any registered security to any other member, broker or dealer in an amount not greater than the
maximum loan value of such security, which (except in the
case of an exempted security) shall be such special maximum
loan value as the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System shall prescribe for the purposes of this subsection
(b) from time to time in supplements to this regulation,
which will be issued in advance of the date on which such
maximum loan value becomes effective: Provided, That (1)
such other member, broker, or dealer is subject to the
provisions of this regulation or has places of business
only in foreign countries, (2) such credit is extended or
maintained solely for the purpose of enabling such member,
broker, or dealer to carry accounts for his customers other
than his partners, and (3) any credit extended or maintained
by such creditor to or for such other member, broker or
dealer for the purpose of purchasing or carrying securities
for his own account or for the account of his firm or any of
his partners shall not be included in such special account
and shall be subject to the other provisions of this section.
"(b)

"(c)

Extension of credit to distributors, syndicates, etc. "In a special account recorded separately, any creditor may
extend credit on any registered security to the persons and
for the purposes specified below in an amount not greater
than the maximum loan value of such security, which (except
in the case of an exempted security) shall be such special
maximum loan value as the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System shall prescribe for the purposes of this subsection (c) from time to time in supplements to this regulation, which will be issued in advance of the date upon which
such maximum loan value becomes effective: Provided, That
such credit is extended:
(1) To any dealer, for the purpose of financing the
distribution of an issue of securities at wholesale or retail;
or
(2) To any group, joint account or syndicate, for the
purpose of underwriting or distributing an issue of securities."
"SUPPLEMENT TO REGULATION T
ISSUED BY THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Effective February 1, 1936.
Maximum loan values of registered securities (other than
exempted securities) for purposes of Regulation T.




11

196
1/24/36

-6-

"Pursuant to the provisions of section 7 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and section 3 of its Regulation T, as amended,
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System hereby prescribes the following maximum loan values of registered securities
(other than exempted securities) for the purposes of Regulation T:
(1) General rule.-Except as provided in paragranhs
(2) and (3) of this supplement, the maximum loan value
of a registered security (other than an exempted security)
shall be whichever is the higher of:
(A) 45 percent of the current market value of
the security; or
(B) 100 percent of the lowest market value of
the security computed at the lowest market price
therefor during the period of 36 calendar months
immediately prior to the first day of the current
month, but not more than 75 percent of the current
market value: Provided, That until July 1, 1936,
for the purpose of this regulation, the lowest
price at which a security has sold on or after July
1, 1933, but prior to the first day of the current
month, shall be considered as the lowest market
price of such security during the preceding 36
calendar months; and Provided, That the lowest
market price which could be used under the provisions
of this regulation during any calender month may be
used during the first 7 calendar days of the
succeeding calendar month.
(2) Extension of credit to other members, brokers and
dealers.The maximum loan value of a registered security (Other than
an exempted security) in a special account with another
member, broker or dealer, which special account complies with
subsection (b) of section 3 of Regulation T, as amended,
shall be 80 percent of the current market value of the
security.
(3) Extension of credit to distributors
dicates etc.The maximum loan value of a registered security other than
an exempted security) in a special account with a distributor,
Syndicate, etc., which special account complies tith subsection (c) of section 3 of Regulation T, as emended, shall be
80 percent of the current market value of the security."
Carried unanimously, and Messrs. Thurston and
Parry were authorized to prepare a statement for the
press, to be released immediately, with regard to
the Board's action.




197
1/24/36

-7At this point Messrs. Thurston and Parry left the room and Mr.

Smead, Chief of the Division of Bank Operations, joined the
meeting.
Reference was made to memoranda dated January 17 and 18, 1936,
from Mr. James containing recommendations
as to the action to be taken by
the Board on the salaries fixed by the Federal reserve banks

for officers

of the banks during 1936 (except the Federal
Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
from which advice of action with regard to officers' salaries had not
been received when the memoranda were prepared). The memorand
a, which had
been circulated among the members of the Board, pointed out that the Federal Reserve Banks of Philadel
phia, Richmond, St. Louis, and Dallas
Proposed to make no changes in the salaries of officers, that the Federal
Reserve Banks of Boston, New York,
Cleveland, Atlanta, Chicago, Kansas
CitY, and San Francisco had proposed increases in salaries of officers
,
end that the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta had approved decreases in the
salaries of five officers.

It was stated that advice of the officers'

salaries fixed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis during 1936 had
been
received in the Board's offices today, and that increases in salaries
were proposed for certain officers of that bank.
Chairman Eccles stated thct he felt that some of the increases
Proposed, particularly
at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, were not
accord with the position taken by the Board in its letters of January
'
5 1935, and November 22, 1935; that some of the salaries now being paid
were
out of line; and that the only way the Board could satisfactorily
discharge its responsibility in connection with
the approval of salaries




198
1/24/56

-8-

at the Federal reserve banks would be for it to establish a classification of official positions in the banks which would determine the salary
to be paid for
each position without reference to the person occupying
a Particular position. He stated that his suggestion would be that no
action be taken on the increases at this time, and that the matter be
Presented to the new Board with a view to reaching a. decision with regard
to the classification of official positions at the banks.
During the ensuing discussion Mr. Szymczak referred to the procedure established by the Board in 1934 which contemplated that proposed
Changes in salaries of officers of each of the Federal reserve banks
would be submitted informally to the Board's committee for the district
Prior to consideration by the Board of the formal recommendations, and
stated that he felt the Board would not be in a position to act
intelligently on the salaries fixed for officers of the bank until the
%embers had visited the Federal reserve banks and had become acquainted
rith the officers and the character and quality of their work.
Mr. Thomas joined the meeting during Mr. Szymczak's statement.
Mr. O'Connor suggested that there should be prepared for the
c°nsideration of the new Board a memorandum setting forth the position
°f the present Board with regard to salaries of officers at the Federal
reserve banks.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Mr.
Miller outlined briefly the contents of a letter
which he felt should be sent to the chairmen of
all Federal reserve banks with regard to salaries
of officers of the banks, and moved that Mr. Smead
be requested to prepare such a letter.




199
1/24/36

-9Carried unanimously.
Mr. Miller also moved that the present
Board recommend to the new Board that it
appoint a committee to study the organization
of each Federal reserve bank, with particular
reference to the salaries paid to the senior
officers.
Carried unanimously.
Messrs. O'Connor and Smeed withdrew from the meeting at this

Point.
Reference was then made to a list of items proposed to be placed
in the policy record required to be kept by the Board under the provisions of the last paragraph of Section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act,
on which questions had been raised as to whether they should be included
in the record.

Each of the items was revieved briefly by Mr. Morrill.

Mr. Eccles referred to the decision previously reached by the Board
that the record should include only matters of an important nature 'which
affect the public interest, and Mr. Miller stated that in a recent conversation with Senator Glass the latter had confirmed the understanding
that it was the intention of Congress that only such matters should be
Placed in the record.
It was agreed unanimously that the following matters should be eliminated from the policy
record:
Classification of member banks for purpose of electing Class
A and B directors.
Holding company affiliate and affiliate relationships of
member banks of which both Northwest Bancorporation and the
Reconstruction Finance Corporation own stock.




200
1/24A6

-10-

Resolution making provision for the handling of Clayton
Act applications pending before the Board at the time of
the enactment of the Banking Act of 1935.
Filing of an application with the Torks Progress Administration for the allotment of funds to enable the Board to
sponsor a sample study of the distribution and activity of
deposits for the period from January, 1928 to June, 1931,
inclusive.
Question whether bank should apply for additional Federal
reserve bank stock on basis of par value of its stock and
of surplus as shown by its books, or whether such book
surplus should be ignored in making application for
additional stock.
Waiver of compliance by State member banks in Maryland
with condition of membership requiring deposit of securities to secure trust funds deposited in commercial department.
Reply to the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago with regard to
the desirability of an active campaign for applications for
membership from State banks.
Appointment of Mr. J. David Stern as D Class C director at
the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Matter of granting indefinite extension of effective date
for compliance by Fall River Trust Company, Fall River,
Massachusetts, with the provisions of condition of membership requiring bank to remove from its banking quarters the
offices of a cooperative bank now located therein.
Entry with regard to calling meeting of Federal Open Market
Committee.
• Question whether "agency accounts" in the foreign Department
of the Industrial Trust Company, Providence, Rhode Island,
are deposits within the meaning of Section 19 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Letter to Mr. Hofmann on question whether bank may make a
loan to a depositor on the security of his time certificate
of deposit.
Letter to Mr. Curtiss regarding absorption of charges for
examinations of State member banks.




201
1/24/36

-11--

Question of appointment of officers of the Federal reserve
banks to serve after December 31, 1935.
It was also agreed unanimously that the
following matters should be included in the
policy record and that the entry with regard
to the eligibility for membership in the Federal Reserve System of State banks having outstanding certificates representing waived
deposits should be entered in the record under
date of November 8, 1935, the date upon which
the question of policy involved was discussed:
Salaries of officers and employees of the Federal reserve
banks for 1936.
Adoption of Regulations "I", IlDu and "Q".
Exchange by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago of maturing
Treasury notes for a corresponding amount of a new issue.
Question of policy considered in connection with the grant
of trust powers to the Decatur County National Bank of
Greensburg, Indiana.
During the consideration of this matter Mr. Wyatt was called
out of the
meeting.
Chairman Eccles stated that he had received a letter dated
januarY 20, 1936, from Mr. Crowley, Chairman of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, advising that a thorough study and consideration
of the definition of "interest" as contained in subsection l(f) of the
13(3ard l 5 Regulation "Q" had led the Corporation to the conclusion that
to

4

-Lnclude the same provision in its regulation with regard to the

PaYMent of interest by insured nonmember banks would very adversely affect
t°0 many small insured banks, and that, while it was realized that
hal*monious regulations by the Board and the Corporation were most desirable, it appeared that in this particular instance facts and conwere such that the Corporation could not cooperate with the




202
1/24/36

-12-

Board to the extent desired.

Chairman Eccles said that the definition

of "interest" as contained in the regulation issued by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation to become effective on February 1, 1936,
does not prohibit the absorption
of exchange or collection charges by
insured nonmember banks as indirect payments of interest, that he felt
that the action to be taken by the Board vith regard to the definition
of "interest" in Regulation "Q" was a matter which should be given
very careful consideration, and that, therefore, he desired to suggest
that the Federal reserve banks be advised that, pending further consideration of the matter by the Board, a date upon which subsection (f)
of section 1 of Regulation
"Q" would become effective had not been fixed,
and that the status of the definition of "interest"
in Regulation "Q"
would remain unchanged for the present.
Mr. Szymczak moved that counsel be requested to prepare for consideration a telegram to all Federal reserve banks in accordance
with Chairman Eccles' suggestion.
Carried unanimously.
Chairman Eccles then brought up for consideration the following
resolution
adopted by the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting
°11 January 21, 1936, copies of which had been sent to the members of the
Board following the adjournment of the meeting of the Federal Open
Market Committee:
"The Committee has considered the preliminary memorandum and has reviewed the credit situation. It is the
sense of the Committee that, so far as business, credit,
and banking conditions are concerned, there is nothing in
the present situation to prompt the Committee to change




203
1/24/36

-13-

"its views as expressed in its resolution adopted on
December 18th, which the Committee respectfully renews.
"The Committee recognizes that the risks of action
are somewhat increased by the present budgetary situation,
but it recognizes also that the longer action is delayed,
the greater are the dangers resulting from the combination
of inordinately large excess reserves and an unbalanced
budgetary position, and the greater will be the difficulty
of taking remedial action.
"Vierinp the situation as e whole, the Committee
strongly believes that action looking toward a substantial
reduction in excess reserves should be taken as soon as
this may be feasible, in the judgment of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, having in mind the
advantages of a coordinated program of recovery."
The resolution was discussed and it was
the unanimous agreement of the members present
that the resolution called for no action by the
Board at this time, but that a letter to the
Chairman of the Federal Open Market Committee
should be prepared in accordance with suggestions
made during the discussion.
Consideration was given to a memorandum dated December 2, 1935,
from counsel,
expressing the opinion, based on the reasons stated in
the memorandum, that the Continental Nationa
l Bank and Trust Company
of Chicago, Illinois, should be require
d to maintain reserves against
so-called uninvested trust
funds.

The memorandum, together with a

draft of letter to the
Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal Reserve Bank
Of Chicago which stated that it was the
opinion of the Board that the
maintenance of reserve
s by the Continental National Bank and Trust
CompanY against the uninvested trust funds was required both by section
19 of the Federal Reserve Act and the provisions of the Board's
Regulation "D", had been circulated among the members of the Board, and Mr.
Thomas had attached a memorandum to the file stating that he did not
agree with the ruling proposed in the
letter.




204
1/24/36

-14After a brief discussion during which other
members expressed agreement with ?Ir. Thomas'
position, counsel was requested to prepare, for
consideration, a letter to the Federal reserve
agent advising that the maintenance of reserves
by the bank against the trust funds referred to
is not required.
On this action Mr. Szymczak voted "no".
The minutes of the meetings of the Board of Governors of the

Federal Reserve System held on November 30, December 3, 4, 9, 10, 11,
12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21: 23, 24, 27, 28, 30, 31 (two meetings), 1935,
and January 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 1:3, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, and 21,
1936, were approved unanimously.
The minutes of the meetings of the Executive Committee of the

t

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System held on December 5,
7, 13, 1935, and January 7, 1936, were approved and the actions recorded
therein were ratified unanimously.
The minutes of the meetings of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System with the Federal Open Market Committee held on
December 17 and 18, 1935, were approved unanimously.
Consideration was then given to each of the matters hereinafter
referred to and the action stated with respect thereto was taken by the
Board:
Telegrams to Mr. Fry, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent at the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, stating that the Board approves the
est
ablishment without change by the bank on January 23, 1936, of the
rates of
discount and purchase in its existing schedule.




Approved unanimously.

205
1/24/36

-15Letter to the chairmen and governors of all Federal reserve

banks, reading as follows:
"The authority granted by the Federal Reserve Board
to all Federal Reserve banks in its circular of July 26,
1932 (X-7215-a), as amended by its letter of July 8, 1935
(X-9257), to discount eligible notes, drafts and bills of
exchange for individuals, partnerships and corporations,
subject to the provisions of the law, the Board's regulations,
and that circular, 1.1.11 expire at the close of business on
January 31, 1936. The Board has decided to extend such
authorization for an additional six months.
"The Board has revised its circular of July 26, 1932
(X-7215-a), effective February 1, 1936, in order to conform
to a change in the law on this subject made by section 322
of the Banking Act of 1935, and a copy of the circular as
revised is inclosed herewith. You will observe that section
2 of the revised circular contains an authorization by the
Board to all Federal Reserve banks, for a period ending at
the close of business on July 51, 1936, to discount eligible
notes, drafts and bills of exchange for individuals, partnerships and corporations, subject to the provisions of the
law, the Board's regulations and the circular.
"You may if you Irish have the revised circular printed
or mimeographed and give copies thereof to persons making
inquiries regarding this subject, together with copies of
the Board's Regulation A and of any supplemental circular
and any forms which your bank may adopt with the approval
of your counsel."
Approved unanimously. The revised
circular referred to above read as follows:
"The third paragraph of Section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended by the Acts of July 21, 1932, and
August 23, 1935, provides as follows:
'In unusual and exigent circumstances, the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
by the affirmative vote of not less than five members, may authorize any Federal reserve bank, during
ouch periods as the said board may determine, at
rates established in accordance with the provisions
of section 14, subdivision (d), of this Act, to discount for any individual, partnership, or corporrtion,
notes, drafts, and bills of exchange of the kinds
and maturities made eligible for discount for member




206
1/24/36

-16-

"banks under other provisions of this Act when
such notes, drafts, and bills of exchange are indorsed or otherwise secured to the satisfaction
of the Federal reserve bank: Provided, That before discounting any such note, draft, or bill of
exchange for an individual or a partnership or
corporation the Federal reserve bank shall obtain
evidence that such individual, partnership, or
corporation is unable to secure adequate credit
accommodations from other banking institutions.
All such discounts for individuals, partnerships,
or corporations shall be subject to such limitations,
restrictions, end regulations as the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System may prescribe.'
"In view of the fact that the power conferred by this
provision can be exercised only in 'unusual and exigent
circumstances', the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System has not prescribed any formal regulations governing
the exercise of this power; but the requirements of the law
and the procedure which the Board will expect to be followed
are outlined below for the information of the Federal reserve
banks and any individuals, partnerships or corporations that
may contemplate applying to them for discounts.
"1. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.
"It will be observed that, by the express terms of the
law:
"(a) The power conferred upon the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System to authorize Federal reserve banks
to discount eligible paper for individuals, partnerships or
corporEtions may be exercised only:
(1) In unusual and exigent circumstances,
(2) By the affirmative vote of not less than
five members of the Board of Governors, and
(3) For such periods as the Board of Governors
may determine.
"(b) When so authorized, a Federal Reserve Bank may discount for individuals, partnerships or corporations only notes,
drafts and bills of exchange of the kinds and maturities made
eligible for discount for member banks, under other provisions
(Sections 13, 13a, and 24) of the Federal Reserve Act. (Such
Paper must, therefore, comply with the applicable requirements
of the Regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System.)
"(c) Paper discounted for individuals, partnerships or
corporations must be either (1) indorsed or (2) otherwise
secured to the satisfaction of the Federal reserve bank.




207
1/24/56

-17-

"(d) Before discounting paper for any individual,
partnership or corporation, a Federal reserve bank must
obtain evidence that such individual, partnership or
corporation is unable to secure adequate credit accommodations from other banking institutions.
"(e) Such discounts may be made only at rates established by the Federal reserve banks, subject to review and
determination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
"(f) All discounts for individuals, partnerships or
corporations are subject to such limitations, restrictions,
and regulations as the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System may prescribe.
"2. AUTHORIZATION BY THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS.
"The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
pursuant to the power conferred upon it by the amendment
hereinbefore quoted, hereby authorizes all Federal reserve
banks, for a period ending at the close of business on July
51, 1936, to discount eligible notes, drafts and bills of
exchange for individuals, partnerships and corporations,
subject to the provisions of the law, the Board's regulations,
and this circular.
"5. FOR WHOM PAPER MAY BE DISCOUNTED.
"A Federal reserve bank may discount for individuals,
partnerships or corporations notes) drafts or bills of exchange,
which are the obligations of such individuals, partnerships,
or corporations or which are the obligations of other parties
actually owned by such individuals, partnerships or corporations.
"Within the meaning of this circular, the term 'corporations'
does not include banks.
"4. APPLICATIONS FOR DISCOUNT.
"Each application of an individual, partnership or
corporation for the discount of eligible paper by the Federal
reserve bank must be addressed to the Federal Reserve Bank of
the District in which the principal place of business of the
applicant is located, must be made in writing on a form furnished
for that purpose by the Federal reserve bank and must contain,
or be accompanied by, the following:
"(a) A statement of the circumstances giving rise to the
application and of the purposes for which the proceeds of the
discount are to be used;
"(b) Evidence sufficient to satisfy the Federal reserve
bank as to (1) the legal eligibility of the paper offered for
discount under the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and the




208
1/24/36

-18-

"Regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System and (2) its acceptability from a credit
standpoint;
"(c) A statement of the efforts made by the applicant
to obtain adequate credit accommodations from other banking institutions, including the names and addresses of all
other banking institutions to which applications for such
credit accommodations were made, the dates upon which such
applications were made, whether such applications were
definitely refused and the reasons, if any, given for such
refusal;
"(d) A list showing each bank with which the applicant
has had banking relations, either as a depositor or as a
borrower, during the preceding year, -ith the approximate
date upon which such banking relations commenced and, if
such banking relations have been terminated, the approximate date of their termination;
"(e) Complete credit data regarding the financial
condition of the principal obligors and indorsers, if any,
on the paper offered for discount;
"(f) A list and description of any collateral or other
security offered by the applicant;
"(g) A waiver by the applicant of demand, notice and
protest as to applicant's obligation on all paper discounted
by the Federal reserve bank or held by the Federal reserve
bank as security; and
"(h) An agreement by the applicant, in form satisfactory
to the Federal reserve bank, (1) to furnish additional credit
information to the Federal reserve bank, when requested, (2)
to submit to audits, credit investigations or examinations by
representatives of the Federal reserve bank at the expense of
the applicant, whenever requested by the Federal reserve
bank, and (3) to furnish additional security whenever requested
to do so by the Federal Reserve Bank.
"5. GRANT OR REFUSAL OF APPLICATION.
"Before discounting notes, drafts, or bills of exchange
for any individual, partnership or corporation, the Federal
reserve bank shall ascertain to its satisfaction by such
means as it may deem appropriate:
"(a) That the financial condition and credit standing
of the applicant justify the granting of such credit
accommodations;
"(b) That the paper offered for discount is acceptable
from a credit standpoint and eligible from a legal standpoint;
"(c) That the indorsement or the security offered is
adequate to protect the Federal reserve bank against loss;
"(d) That there is a reasonable need for such credit
accommodations; and




209
1/24/36

-19-

"(e) That the applicant is unable to obtain adequate
credit accommodations from other banking institutions.
"A special effort should be made to determine whether
the banking institution with which the applicant ordinarily
transacts his banking business or any other banking institution to which the applicant ordinarily IvAild have access is
willing to grant such credit accommodations.
"A Federal reserve bank should not discount such paper
unless it appears that the proceeds of such discounts will
be used to finance current business operations and not for
Speculative purposes, for permanent or fixed investments, or
for any other capital purposes. Except with the permission
of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, no
such paper should be discounted if it appears that the proceeds will be used for the purpose of paying off existing
indebtedness to other banking institutions.
"In discounting paper for individuals, partnerships
or corporations, a Federal reserve bank should not make any
commitment to renew or extend such paper or to grant further
or additional discounts.
"6. LIMITATIONS.
"Except with the permission of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, no Federal reserve bank shall
discount for any one individual, partnership or corporation
Paper amounting in the aggregate to more than one per cent
of the paid-in capital stock and surplus of such Federal
reserve bank.
"7. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
"Any Federal reserve bank may prescribe such additional
requirements and procedure respecting discounts hereunder as
it may deem necessary or advisable; provided that such requirements and procedure are consistent with the provisions of the
law, the Board's regulations and the terms of this circular."
Letter to Mr. Fry, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal
Reserve Bank of Richmond, reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of Jaluary 17, 1936,
relative to the Clayton Act permit granted November 30, 1932,
to Mr. Lawrence M. Miller, Baltimore, Maryland, to serve at
the same time as director of The National Marine Bank of
Baltimore and as director of the Colonial Trust Company, both
of Baltimore, Maryland, in which you request advice as to
whether, under the provisions of section 8 of the Clayton Act,
a8 amended, and the Board's revised Regulation LI effective




210
1/24/56

-20--

"January 4, 1936, Mr. Viller may continue to serve ES a
director of The National Marine Bank of Baltimore and
at the same time as director and president of the Colonial
Trust Company.
"It appears that on August 23, 1935, the effective
date of the Banking Act of 1935, Mr. Miller was lawfully
serving as a director of the two institutions under the
authority of the permit granted to him on November 30,
1932, and, accordingly, under the provisions of section
8 of the Clayton Act, as amended, and section 2(c) of
the revised Regulation LI effective January 4, 1936, he
may, if he so desires, continue to serve as a director of
these institutions until February 1, 1939. However, the
provisions of section 2(c) of the revised Regulation L,
effective January 4, 1936, apply only to directors, officers,
or employees of member banks of the Federal Reserve System
or any branch thereof who, on August 23, 1935, were lawfully serving at the same time as private bankers or as
directors, officers, or employees of any other bank, banking
association, savings bank, or trust company and the phrase
'interlocking relationship involving a member bank' as used
in this section refers to the particular interlocking services as director, officer or employee existing on that date
and not to interlocking relationships existing as betreen
institutions. Therefore, since Mr. Miller was not serving
as president of the Colonial Trust Company, Baltimore,
Maryland, on August 23, 1935, the exception set forth in
section 2(c) of the revised Regulation L is not applicable
to such service and, accordingly, he may not serve as
President of the Colonial Trust Company while serving at
the same time as a director of The National Marine Bank
of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, unless such service
would come within some of the other exceptions contained in
section 8, as amended, or the Board's revised Regulation L.
"In this connection, there is inclosed a copy of a
letter dated January 13, 1936, from Mr. Miller, addressed
to the Comptroller of the Currency and referred to the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for reply relative
to his services with these banks. It will be appreciated
if you will make appropriate disposition of the inquiry contained in Mr. Miller's letter of January 13, 1956 to the
Comptroller of the Currency."




Approved unanimously.

211
1/206




-21-

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

sliALO 19
Secretary.

Chairman.