View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

51

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Tuesday, January 11, 1949.

The Board

Met in the Board Room at 10:35 a.m.

PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

McCabe, Chairman
Eccles
Szymczak
Draper
Evans
Vardaman
Clayton
Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Morrill, Special Adviser
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Thomas, Director of the Division of
Research and Statistics
Mr. Vest, General Counsel
Mr. Townsend, Solicitor

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Chairman McCabe stated that on Friday afternoon, January

7,

there was received from the Bureau of the Budget a request for a
report on a
draft of bill "To Establish a Comprehensive and Coordinated Stabilization Policy and for Other Purposes", that a reply
was Prepared for his signature on Saturday, January

8, based on

ecti°ne already taken by the Board, and that, in view of the ur6encY of the request, the reply was sent to the Budget Bureau on
that day.

The reply, a copy of which was sent to each member of

the Board yesterday, read as follows:
"This refers to your letter of January 7, 1949,
In which you request an expression of views regarding
the draft of bill, enclosed with your letter, 'To establish a comprehensive and coordinated stabilization




1/11/49

-2-

"'program, and for other purposes'. The bill, which is
entitled 'Stabilization Act of 1949', contains eight
proposed titles, the last of which relates to consumer
credit and bank reserves.
"In its letter to the Director of the Bureau of
the Budget dated November 30, 1948, the Board stated
that the subject of bank reserves was being given
thorough consideration with a view to the formulation
Of a recommendation at a later date when economic
trends could be evaluated more accurately. The Board
also stated that it expected to propose that the authority over consumer instalment credit be extended
or made permanent by appropriate legislation formulated in the light of experience under the existing
legislation with a view to the introduction of a
bill during the early part of the next session of
Congress. Since writing that letter, the Board has
given considerable thought to the problem of the most
appropriate time at which legislation on these subjects
might be introduced and has come to the conclusion that
it is desirable that such legislation should be introduced, not as a part of a comprehensive bill, but later
as separate legislation.
"In conformity with the principle of decentralization on which the Federal Reserve System was established,
it is the policy of the Board to obtain the views of the
twelve Federal Reserve Banks on important proposals affecting the System. In pursuance of this policy, the
Board has submitted to the Presidents of the Federal
Reserve Banks tentative drafts of bills on bank reserves
and consumer credit which its staff has prepared in the
light of the study given these subjects and in accordance with the President's Economic Report. The Board
has not yet received the comments of the Reserve Banks.
"In the Board's judgment, there is not the same
urgency for the presentation to Congress of bills with
respect to bank reserves and consumer credit as exists
With respect to the other titles of the proposed Stabilization Act of 1949. The Board now has authority
to increase reserve requirements of member banks and
to regulate consumer credit. This authority, which
was enacted August 16, 1948, will not expire until
June 30, 1949.
"In view of these circumstances, we believe it is
important from the standpoint of obtaining favorable




1/11/49

-3--

"Congressional action to have as much experience under
existing authority as possible before determining finally upon the specific details of legislation to carry
into effect the recommendations in the President's
Economic Report on these subjects. This would be in
accord with the understanding which was had at a recent
meeting of the committee of which Mr. Nourse is chairman.
"I have no comments to offer at this time with respect to other titles of the proposed Stabilization Act
of 1949. I appreciate the opportunity which you have
afforded me to comment on the proposed bill and also
the opportunity for members of our staff to participate
Iii the discussions which have been held at the offices
of the Council of Economic Advisers with regard to the
Proposed, legislation. When our drafts of bills regarding bank reserves and consumer credit have been completed, we will, of course, transmit them to the Budget
Bureau."
All of the members of the Board indicated the letter was
sat
isfactory to them and that they were willing to approve it.
Chairman McCabe also said that yesterday he sent a copy
Of the letter to Dr. Nourse, Chairman of the committee coordinating
Material
for the President's legislative program, and that Dr.
Iklurse, in a telephone conversation, confirmed the understanding
t a

.rig,
of the Nourse committee that legislation on consumer
meet1

credit and reserve requirements would be excluded from any omnibus
bill.

Dr. Nourse also stated, Chairman McCabe said, that his of-

fice had received a call from Mt. Murphy at the White House on
'IsidaY, January

7, asking that all of the legislation for the

esident's program be 4 nc1uded in the bill, but that he (Dr.
'
i'l
11°111.8e) would discuss the matter with Secretary of Agriculture




1/11/49

-4-

Brannan, who was coordinating the bills and testimony on the legislative program for the President, and remind him of the agreement regarding the exclusion of the Board's proposals from an
omnibus bill.

Chairman McCabe added that Dr. Nourse was in com-

Plete agreement with the manner in which the -legislation on reserve

requirements and consumer credit was being handled by the

Board and, had agreed to call back after his conversation with
Secretary Brannan.

Chairman McCabe stated that, in view of the

agreement of the Nourse committee, he also informed Secretary
SnYder of these developments and sent him a copy of the letter
Of January 8.
Question was raised as to what the position of the Board
/1°uld be in the event of a request that the omnibus bill include
legislative proposals with respect to consumer credit controls
atd

reserve requirements, and it was agreed that in such case a

Illeetimg of the Board should be called to consider the matter
further.
Chairman McCabe wide the further statement that the Chairmen of the
Banking and Currency Committees were coming to luncheon
°A different days this week, when it was hoped the question of legOn these two matters could be discussed with them.

He also

8844 that last
week he had a conference with Mr. Woollen, President
°r the American Bankers Association, and that while Mr. Woollen




-5indicated that he would oppose the legislation proposed by the Board,
the conference was a very friendly one.
There ensued a discussion of the timing of the introduction
of the legislation on reserve requirements and consumer credit, but
ao decisions were reached.
Mr. Evans stated that yesterday Mr. William F. Kelley, ChairInan of the Consumer Credit Committee of the American Bankers Association

and Mr. Walter B. French, Deputy Manager of the American

Bankers Association, called to discuss the terms of Regulation W,
C°nsumer Instalment Credit, particularly with respect to the possibilitY of lengthening the maturities permitted under the present
regulation.

Mr. Evans said that both Mt. Kelley and Mr. French

felt if any action were to be taken to extend the terms it would
be better to eliminate the maturity requirements entirely rather
t
hcx11 to extend them, since many Registrants would be inclined and
able to retain maturities of 18 months or thereabouts if no maxi141114 were specified, whereas if 24 months were specified as a maximum that would tend to become the minimum.

He also referred to

"her conversations which indicated that, except in certain quarters/ the pressure for relaxing the Regulation was not strong.
Mr. Evans then referred to the informal letter he had
/ritten to General Motors Corporation, Chrysler Corporation, and
'ord Motor
Company under date of December 31, 1948, to which he




1/11/49

-6-

referred at the meeting on January 7, and stated that a reply was
received from B. E. Hutchinson, Chairman of the Finance Committee
of Chrysler Corporation, dated January 5, 1949, in which he reiterated his opposition to instalment credit controls but did not
suggest any changes in Regulation W at this time.
being circulated among the members of the Board.

The letter is
He made the

further statement that he received a telephone call yesterday from
Mr. Albert Bradley, Vice President of General Motors Corporation,
in reSPOnse to the letter to that company and that Mr. Bradley

84
'
4 Possible other representatives were coming to the Board's
°ffices to discuss the matter at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, January
13) 1949.

No response, he said, had been received to the letter

to the
Ford Motor Company.
During the discussion Messrs. Leonard, Director of the
tivision of Bank Operations, and Young, Associate Director of
he

Division of Research and Statistics, entered the meeting.
There was a general discussion of the present economic

sitUation and the relationship of Regulation W to that situation
'
(
l also of the conditions under which action might be taken by
el

the Board to relax the regulation. Mr. Evans stated that the
stElff would continue to study the problem and would be prepared
to mak
e a recommendation for the consideration of the Board at
alkY time.




raL

1/13/1+9

-7At this point Messrs. Riefler, Thomas, Vest, Leonard, Townsend,

and Young withdrew and the action stated with respect to each of the
Matters hereinafter referred to was taken by the Board:
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on January 10, 1949, were approved unaniIllonsly.
Memorandum dated January 10, 1949, from Mr. Bethea, Director
Of the Division of Administrative Services, recommending an increase
in the basic salary of Stanley J. Bloch, Assistant Supervisor, Duplicating and Mail Section in that Division, from $3,978 to $4,103.40
Per annum, effective January 23, 1949.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Caldwell, Federal Reserve Agent at the Federal
Reserve Bank of Kansas City, reading as follows:
"In accordance with the request contained in
Mr. Johns' letter of January 4, 1949, the Board of
Governors approves, effective January 1, 1949, the
the
Payment of salaries to the following members of
indicated:
rates
the
at
staff
Federalqieserve Agent's
Annual
Salary
Title
Nwle
Head Office
Assistant Federal Reserve
Maurice Allendoerfer
$4,236
Agent
Assistant
Federal
Alternate
Xenneth B. Self
5,220
Reserve Agent

a. B. Fisher




Denver Branch
Federal Reserve Agent's
Representative

4,320

1/11/49

-8-

Name
David E. Chase
Lee G. Cox

Title
Oklahoma City Branch
Federal Reserve Agent's
Representative
Federal Reserve Agent's
Representative

Annual
Salary

$4,500
4,500

Omaha Branch
Federal Reserve Agent's
4,320
Representative
Board
the
that
letter
Johns'
Mr.
from
noted
is
"It
of Governors will be advised when the branch boards have
taken final official action with respect to the salaries
tentatively fixed for Messrs. Fisher, Cox, and Streeter."

Earl O. Streeter

Approved unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. DeMoss, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas, reading as follows:
"Reference your letter January 6. Board approves
appointment of Nathaniel Buckley Harwell as examiner
for Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Please advise
effective date."
Approved unnnimously.
Letter to the Presidents of all Federal Reserve Banks readas follows:
"Replies to the letter dated December 29, 1948,
from the Board's Division of Examinations to the officers in charge of examinations at the various Reserve Banks indicate that the dates proposed for holdlug a conference of representatives of the Bank Examination Departments of the Reserve Banks in Washing_
ton, during the week preceding the 1949 Mid-Winter
Trust Conference of the American Bankers Association,
would be satisfactory. Accordingly, the Examiners'
Conference will be held in the Board's offices in
Washington on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, February 2-4, 1949.




1/11/49

-9-

"It has been suggested that, in addition to discussing bank supervisory matters, the conference give
consideration to bank examination problems as well.
With this thought in mind, it is hoped that the Chief
Examiners for all of the Reserve Banks, as well as the
Officers in charge of examinations, will be present and
It will be appreciated
Participate in the discussions.
if you will advise us as to the names of the representatives of your Bank who will attend the conference and
whether you desire us to make hotel reservations.
"The Reserve Banks have been requested to forward
suggestions for the agenda and a copy of the agenda
Will be sent to you when it has been prepared."
Approved unanimously.

APProved:




Chairman.