View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

90

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Wednesday, January 10, 1951.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

McCabe, Chairman
Evans
Vardaman
Norton
Powell
Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Paderal Reserve System on January 9, 1951; were approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Denmark, 'Vice President of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Atlanta, reading as follows:
"In accordance with the request contained in your
letter of January 4, 1951, the Board approves the designation of the following individuals as special assistant examiners for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta:
Joe Edward Cobb
Travis Wilson."
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. Young, President of the Federal Reserve Bank
Of Chicago, reading as follows:
"Re Diercks' letter January 2 as to whether Matthew
J. Hickey, Jr., President and Director of Hickey & Co.,
would be prohibited by section 32 of the Banking Act of
1933 from serving the Chicago National Bank as a director.
On basis of facts contained in Diercks t letter, and in
line with previous rulings of the Board on this subject,
Board sees no reason to disagree with opinion of Counsel
for your bank that the proposed service would be prohibited."




Approved manimously.

91
1/10/51

-2Letter to Honorable I. W. Duggan, Governor, Farm Credit

Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington 251

ID.

C., reading as follows:
"This is in response to your letter of December 27,
1950, in which you requested the Board's interpretation
as to the application of Regulation X to the following
factual situation:
'An applicant requests a loan of $21000 to pay part
of the cost of completing the construction of a farm
residence started after October 121 1950. The loan is
to be set up for complete repayment within one year from
farm income. However, the Statement of the Borrower
discloses that he has obtained elsewhere $100000 credit
for part of the cost of construction; and the maximum
loan value of the residence, determined pursuant to the
Regulation, is $1115.00.1
"The Board considers that Regulation X does not
apply to the loan of $21000 for construction of the farm
residence since it is short-term construction credit
Wider the provisions of the first sentence of section
5(h) of the regulation."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Honorable Frederick J. Lawton, Director, Bureau

c)f the Budget, Washington 251 D. C., reading as follows:
"The Board of Governors proposes to recommend to
the Congress an amendment to the Assignment of Claims
Act of 1940 for the purpose of removing a serious obstacle to the successful administration of the current
gUaranteed loan program for financing defense contractors authorized by section 301 of the Defense Production
Act of 1950 and the President's Executive Order No. 10161.
"Many banks are unwilling to make loans to defense
Production contractors on the security of assignments of
monies to become due under Government contracts because
of apprehension lest payments received from the Government by the assignee bank may subsequently be recovered
bY the Government on account of other indebtednesses of




1/10/51

_3_

"the contractor to the Government. The proposed amendment is intended to clarify the rights of lending banks
taking such assignments of claims and thereby to encourage maximum participation by private financing institutions in the defense production program. There is enclosed
a draft of the proposed amendment, together with an
explanatory statement.
"This matter has been the subject of discussion
by the Board with representatives of the Department of
Defense and the other guaranteeing agencies involved in
the current guaranteed loan program and also with representatives of the American Bankers Association. Members
Of the Board's staff have also discussed the matter from
time to time with representatives of your Bureau.
"The matter is one of vital importance to the defense
Program and the Board feels strongly that an appropriate
amendment to the Assignment of Claims Act of 1940 is urgently required. Accordingly, we will appreciate being
advised as promptly as possible whether there is any objection on the part of the Bureau of the Budget to the
submission by the Board of this recommendation to the
Congress."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Presidents of all Federal Reserve Banks,

read-

0.8 follows:
"In order that the Federal Reserve Banks may proceed
with the printing of Identification Certificates for the
Regulation X investigators, there is enclosed a text which
has been approved by the Board. In the interest of uniformity it is deemed advisable that the same text be used
by all of the Reserve Banks. However, the seal of the
issuing Bank may or may not be shadow printed on the certificate as desired, and the Board would have no objection to
aPpending to the certificate the photograph of the investigator. Also, the exact size of the certificate is left to
the discretion of the issuing Bank."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Presidents of all Federal Reserve Banks, readLac

as follows:




"One of the more difficult problems in connection
with the enforcement program for Regulation X is the
determination of the compliance of insurance companies
With the Regulation. As you undoubtedly know, insurance
companies are examined by State supervisory agencies
usually not oftener than once every two years and, quite
frequently, examinations may occur only once in 3 to 5
year periods. Hence the supervisory agencies normally
authorized to examine insurance companies may be wnable
to ascertain compliance with Regulation X except at such
infrequent intervals that enforcement is largely nullified.
"It is essential, therefore, that the extent of the
compliance of the insurance companies with Regulation X
be ascertained through the investigational activities of
the Federal Reserve banks, since it seems probable that
ne other reliable measure of the compliance of insurance
companies will be currently available. Some of the Reserve Banks have already made arrangements with State
insurance commissioners for the purpose of investigating
insurance companies. It is necessary in the interest of
adequate enforcement that a uniform policy be observed
in such investigations. As a consequence conferences
have been held with representatives of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, for the purpose of
adopting a policy of investigation which would be mutually
satisfactory.
"The discussions of the subject were held with the
Liaison Committee of the National Association at its MidWinter Conference on December 13th, 19500 in Los Angeles.
The Liaison Committee is empowered to administer the relations between the various zones established by the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners throughout
the country and has agreed to approve the following steps
Of an investigative procedure:
1. When a Reserve bank decides to investigate an insurance company, it should notify (a) the State Commissioner
Of Insurance within whose State the insurance company is
located, and (b) the N.A.I.C. zone chairman whose name
appears on pages 31 and 32 of the enclosed booklet of the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners. The
Purpose of this notification is to obtain the concurrence
of the State Commissioner in the proposed investigation,
and to ascertain current information which he may possess
resulting from a possible recent examination or other




_5_

1/10/51

"sources of information. It is also desirable not
to conflict with any arrangements for examinations
about which he may have made a decision.
2. It was agreed that the State Commissioner should
be given the opportunity to have one of his examiners
accompany the investigators for the Reserve Bank. '
3. A copy of the investigation report after completion should be forwarded to the State Commissioner.
"It will be noted, if reference is made to
Pages 31 and 32 of the enclosed booklet, that the
entire United States is divided into so-called N.A.I.C.
zones and that each zone comprises a nuMber of states.
Each of the states comprising a zone elects a zone
chairman and the Liaison Committee of the Association
expressed the conviction that it was important from the
Standpoint of its own administration that the zone
chairman be notified prior to the start of an
investigation.
"W. Ellery Alley, Commissioner of Insurance, of the
State of Connecticut, who is President of the N.A.I.C.
has given assurances of full cooperation of the National
Association with the enforcement program. In his address
to the Conference, which included 600 representatives of
insurance companies, he stated that he had previously
attended a meeting at the Federal Reserve Building in
Washington for the discussion of Regulation X and the
enforcement program, and informed the Conference of Insurance Commissioners that the Board of Governors should
have the wholehearted cooperation of the Insurance Commissioners in the enforcement of Regulation X.
"It is quite probable that the above suggested program will not conflict with previous arrangements made
by Federal Reserve banks with Insurance Commissioners.
However, the Board would like the Federal Reserve banks
to comment on this program, and if there are suggestions
for a different procedure, would appreciate receiving them.
"In addition to the copy of the N.A.I.C. booklet,
there is also enclosed a copy of an address made to the
Conference on Regulation X."
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to the Presidents of all Federal Reserve Banks, reading as
follows:




Vio/51

-6-

"One of the Federal Reserve Banks brought to our
attention a request received by it from the National
Retail Credit Association that the latter be permitted
to form a small committee of members in that district
to act as liaison for the association in discussing
matters relating to Regulation W with the Reserve
Bank. We checked with two of the other Reserve Banks
and found that they have received similar requests
and it is assumed that these have been directed to
all Reserve Banks. For your information the consensus
is that this should be discouraged, among other reasons, because those with whom it was discussed were of
the opinion that creation of such a committee would
remove the close personal relationship enjoyed with
individual members of the association and more important that if the Reserve Banks were to agree to
such an arrangement many of the national organizations
may make similar requests."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. McConnell, Vice President of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, reading as follows:
"This refers to Mr. Stotesbery's letter of
December 8, 1950, addressed to you, requesting advice
aS to whether anything in the plan proposed by Bank
Shares Incorporated for the issuance of employees'
fund certificates and corporate notes would be objectionable on the part of the Federal Reserve authorities.
"The Board understaras that national bank examiners
have called attention to violations of section 22(e) of
the Federal Reserve Act by certain subsidiary national
banks of Bank Shares Incorporated through the payment
interest on savings deposits of ,their employees
than is paid the general public. In lieu of these deposits and to encourage thrift among the banks' employees,
the holding company proposes to issue employees' fund
certificates and corporate notes. This would appear to
correct the violation of section 22 but might result in
the violation of section 21 of the Banking Act of 1933,
nich, among other things, prohibits the receipt of
Qeposits by non-banking corporations.
"As the Board has repeatedly stated, the provisions
of section 21 are penal in nature, and an expression of




1/10/51

-7-

"opinion by the Board on questions which may arise under
this statute or which are affected by its provisions
would afford no protection from prosecution if the
Department of Justice upon consideration of the matter
should take the position that a corporation had violated
the statute and should feel it necessary to prosecute
for such violation. (See F.R.L.S #7560 and 0562.)
"Although it would be inappropriate for the Board
to express an opinion as to whether the issuance of
these certificates and notes to employees of the subsidiary banks would violate section 21 of the Banking
Act of 1933, if a subsequent report of examination of
the holding company affiliate indicated the issuance
of certificates or notes under these circumstances,
the Board would consider it a dereliction of duty not
to report the matter to the Attorney General as a possible violation.
"It will be appreciated if you will advise
Mr. Stotesbery accordingly."
Approved unanimously.
Telegram to Mr. Slade, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
Of San Francisco, reading as follows:
"Reurlet January 6 regarding practice of certain
member banks in amending agreements as to time deposit
accounts now subject to withdrawal upon 30 days' notice
and bearing interest at 1 per cent to provide for 90
days' notice of withdrawal and interest at 1-114 per
cent. Since such amendment makes deposits subject to
more severe restriction as to withdrawal and does not
result in payment to depositor, Board feels that
Practice does not constitute payment before maturity
In violation of Regulation
Q and that interest may
ProPerly be paid from date of amendment at rate permitted by Supplement to Regulation Q for deposits
Payable upon written notice of less than 6 months
and not less than 90 days."




Approved linerimously.

9'47

1/10/51
Telegram to Mr. Swan, Assistant Vice President of the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, reading as follows:
"Reurtel December 11, 1950, and O'Kane's
letter of January 4, inquiring whether outstanding street assessment bond with unpaid balance of
$1,100 to be paid annually over a period of 10
years is to be included in 'bona fide sale price'
under section 2(j) of Regulation X, and also whether
it is to be considered as a 'credit outstanding'
for purpose of section 4(a). The answer is yes in
both instances, thus permitting extension of credit
in amount of $11,075."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Laming, Vice President and Cashier of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, reading as follows
"Reference is made to your letter of December
28, 190, with which you submitted budget figures
making provision for estimated expenses incident
to activities under Regulations V and X at your
head office and branches for the year 1951. ApproPriate notations with regard thereto are being
made in the Board's records."




Approved unanimously.

Allow

/

arash

011„
4112
A'
4""A
Secr -1

a